A Glorious Union or America: the New Sparta

How much was David Hunter's death and the leaking of his letters a moral turn point?
While it may of been more pragmatic choice on Union soldiers to fight to death or else they risk execution, it feels more like the those events help turn the Union Army and the rest of the Union into radical abolitionist while publicly and overtly linking the Confederacy to slavery.

And with the greater number of heroic Union Generals and no string of Union defeats(or death toll), I can see the Union Army gaining a much greater respect and pride. And with Kearny at the helm(along with the lack of OTL defeats as mentioned), Europeans appear to respect the US military far more.

It's a major turning point. A few things change:

  • The press coverage now has a theme - Southern Brutality and Barberism. The execution of a major military and political figure transposed with the negro pioneers who died "with" him, have both linked the two in the minds of the press, and elevated all to matyrs. In that context later events, many of which are similar to events in OTL, are viewed through the prism of Hunter's death - the Baton Rouge murders of surrendered soldiers, the killing of the wounded at the Battle of Liberty, the shooting of their own civilians in Richmond, the sending off to bondage of free Pennsylvanians, the Lawrence Massacre and soon Salisbury and Andersonville. All these will be woven into a narrative that the Southern cause is morally corrupted; is barbaric; that the Northern cause is somehow cleaner, nobler, honorable.
  • The army has been radicalised to a greater extent by the actions of Kearny and of the rebels. Kearny's pioneer companies mean that white Union soldiers have lived and worked beside free negros since late 1862; fought beside them in mixed regiments after the arming of the pioneer companies or beside negro regiments after the formation the USCT. The death of Hunter alongside his pioneers and his now widely published sentiments proclaiming his willingess to be matyred in the cause of abolition have also caused a lot more sympathy for the abolistionist cause and a lot sooner than perhaps occurred in OTL.
Kearny's enthusiasm for Europe and its enthusiasm for him will be a matter of great wonder and concern to the statesmen of Europe and America for some little while after the war...
 
Last edited:
A reasonable map of North Carolina for you to follow...

northcarolinarailroads.gif
 
It's a major turning point. A few things change:

  • The press coverage now has a theme - Southern Brutality and Barberism. The execution of a major military and political figure transposed with the negro pioneers who died "with" him, have both linked the two in the minds of the press, and elevated all to matyrs. In that context later events, many of which are similar to events in OTL, are viewed through the prism of Hunter's death - the Baton Rouge murders of surrendered soldiers, the killing of the wounded at the Battle of Liberty, the shooting of their own civilians in Richmond, the sending off to bondage of free Pennsylvanians, the Lawrence Massacre and soon Salisbury and Andersonville. All these will be woven into a narrative that the Southern cause is morally corrupted; is barbaric; that the Northern cause is somehow cleaner, nobler, honorable.
  • The army has been radicalised to a greater extent by the actions of Kearny and of the rebels. Kearny's pioneer companies mean that white Union soldiers have lived and worked beside free negros since late 1862; fought beside them in mixed regiments after the arming of the pioneer companies or beside negro regiments after the formation the USCT. The death of Hunter alongside his pioneers and his now widely published sentiments proclaiming his willingess to be matyred in the cause of abolition have also caused a lot more sympathy for the abolistionist cause and a lot sooner than perhaps occurred in OTL.
Kearny's enthusiasm for Europe and its enthusiasm for him will be a matter of great wonder and concern to the statesmen of Europe and America for some little while after the war...
Ahh okay, I got some sense of that when you mentioned how the Union army has become radicalized. It reminded me of that cavalry unit that fought to a man as it has a pioneer troop attached and wonder at their motivations.

Is the European papers and public opinion also taken a similar turn?
And considering the opinions of Toombs, could other confederates be having second thoughts?

I thought it was interesting as it more firmly links the confederacy with the institution of slavery
 
Is the European papers and public opinion also taken a similar turn?

And considering the opinions of Toombs, could other confederates be having second thoughts?

I thought it was interesting as it more firmly links the confederacy with the institution of slavery

I would imagine the British papers would now be behind the Union anti-slavery cause. I can only see reactionaries and those interested in breaking up a rival still being wedded to the Rebel cause. The French will be interesting too - doesn't Kearny have the Legion d'honour?

Toombs may be viewed as an extreme case but I wonder what happens if someone like General Bragg is put on trial while the war is still in progress. Panic would set in as the southern leaders' worst nightmares were made manifest.

I was always surprised how nationally a hatred of the south for the war didn't persist or indeed gain much traction at all in OTL.
 
Chapter One Hundred and Four Charleston A Tragedy in Black
Chapter One Hundred and Four

Charleston
A Tragedy in Black


From "The Confederate Economy" by Prof. Michael Pierce
Harvard 1991

"The Southern Bread Riots were events of civil unrest in the Confederacy during 1863 and 1864. The shortages had several causes:​

·foraging armies, both Union and Confederate, who ravaged crops and devoured draft animals;
·the staggering inflation created by the Confederate government’s financial policies. This was exacerbated by forgers (many of them Union paid) flooding the economy with fake bills;
·the drought of 1862 had created a poor harvest that did not yield enough in a time when food was already scarce; and
·the infrastructure in the Confederacy was inadequate for a peacetime economy. After 3 years of war and a policy of constant military use it was beginning to break down.

From 1861 to 1863, the price of wheat tripled and butter and milk prices quadrupled. Salt, which at the time was the only practical meat preservative, was very expensive (if available at all) as a result of the Union blockade.

Citizens, mostly women, began to protest the exorbitant price of bread. The protesters believed a negligent government and speculators were to blame. To show their displeasure, many protesters turned to violence. During 1863, in Macon, Atlanta, Augusta and most spectacularly in Richmond, armed mobs attacked stores and warehouses. In North Carolina, mobs had destroyed grocery and dry goods stores.

It was far more profitable for plantation owners to grow cotton and tobacco instead of food. The taxes on clerks, apothecaries and teachers were a mere 2% while taxes on agricultural produce were 10%. This created obvious tensions between differing classes and robbed the farmer of his income and means of providing for his family. Because of this, food crops suffered tremendously through supply and demand.

Food riots were occurring before the arrival of Union troops because the Confederate Army was suffering the same food shortages and was taking food stocks for its own needs. This became a serious problem over the winter of 1863/64. Additionally, as the cost of war for the Confederate government exceeded the tax revenue, legislation was enacted that exacerbated the situation by devaluing the Confederate currency and inflating prices of goods..."

images

Southern women starved as their men fought

From "Resistance from Within" by Lincoln Baines
Buffalo 1973

"In the heartland of secession, Charleston South Carolina, on 18th March [1863] thousands of people, mostly women, broke into shops and began seizing clothing, shoes, food and even jewelry before the Militia arrived to restore order. Pierre Beauregard himself gave a speech about the imminent threat to Charleston from the recently arrived Federal fleet but the mob stayed put. Only when Beauregard threatened to have militiamen fire on the mob did they disperse.

A second night of rioting occurred on 21st March which in the mind of Charlestonians was infinitely more serious as it involved slaves as well as some of the city's poorer white women…

Robert Smalls had been sent to Charleston at the age of 12 to be hired out, with the money earned to be returned to his master, a man called McKee. He held several jobs. He started out in a hotel, then became a lamplighter on the streets of Charleston. His love of the water led him to work on the docks and wharves of Charleston in his teen years.​

He became a stevedore (dockworker), a rigger, a sail maker, and eventually worked his way up to being a wheelman (essentially a pilot, though blacks were not called pilots). He became very knowledgeable of the Charleston harbor…​

Smalls had planned to escape Charleston for some time. An attempt to flee Charleston in the fall of 1861 had failed. In late 1863 Smalls was assigned to steer the CSS Rover, an armed Confederate military transport. On March 21, 1864, the Rover's four white officers decided to spend the night ashore. Smalls had ensured a liberal supply of whisky and all four were apparently drunk as Smalls left them. Although he had not planned to escape during the riot the added confusion following it seemed likely to assist his plan. He proposed taking the CSS Rover with a dozen of the enslaved crewmen and make a run for the Union vessels that formed the newly arrived close blockade.​

220px-Robert_Smalls_-_Brady-Handy.jpg

Robert Smalls in later life

Smalls was dressed in the captain's uniform and had a straw hat similar to that of the white captain. He arrived at the Rover at what was then known as Southern Wharf around 3 a.m. Unfortunately for Smalls one of the ship’s officers was not drunk and had followed Smalls to the wharf. After challenging Smalls a scuffle ensued. The officer, James Trevis, discharged his sidearm at least once killing one of Smalls accomplices. Trevis had been clubbed to the ground as the wharf master and some white crewmen from other vessels arrived on the scene. As a fight broke out between Small’s accomplices and the sailors, at least one man was sent to warn the militia. The garbled nature of that message would have serious consequences. By the time Beauregard was woken at 5am the message he report he received referred to servile insurrection amongst negro slaves on the docks…​

Nerves were taut in Charleston that morning. The previous days’ rioting by hungry slaves had frightened its citizens. The rumors circulating that morning of overnight murders by revolting slaves electrified the city...​

General Beauregard tripled the guard on the government’s slaves [Beauregard had leased many slaves to work on improving Charleston’s defenses]. We know that Smalls eventually escaped the city but one of his accomplices, believed to be Dan Black, was found hiding with relatives and friends in the government’s laborers encampment. His arrest by inexperienced city militia was botched. In the confusion a weapon was discharged. In seconds the militia was discharging volleys into the encampment…​

images

The rioters turned on the city's slaves

For the second time that day Beauregard received a report of servile insurrection and as a result immediately ordered the army to patrol the streets of the city. It was too late. Another riot had begun but this time it was the remaining white male population of the city, with no few uniformed men among its numbers. In the minds of these rioters there was only one way to deal with servile insurrection…​

By the morning of March 22 1863, when a reluctant army and militia finally restored order, it is estimated that somewhere between 500 and 800 slaves, men, women and children, had been killed – either in the militia incident at the Encampment or at the hands of enraged lynch mobs and arsonists bent on defending southern heaths from servile insurrectionists…”
 
Last edited:
And the end draws nigh. Good stuff KI. Amazing that the Confederacy could field armies at all. Have they instituted a censoring of the mail to the men in the field? Things like this could cause some serious concerns about desertion.
 
Back to the War! When do we hear about proposals for Reconstruction? I imagine they are already being discussed.
 
Top