A Glorious Union or America: the New Sparta



Lincoln has a dilemma. Kearny is the public darling and an effective general, so Lincoln needs him. OTOH, Kearny has joined the likes of McClellan in telling Lincoln how to do his job. If the military does not remain subordinate to the civilian government, then what separates the Union from the banana republics? Kearny has massively overstepped his bounds and must be removed from power for the good of the Republic.

Lincoln has to get rid of Kearny, but he can't - yet.



Things are going the Union's way, but Kearny hasn't shown the overall strategic vision needed to coordinate the whole, like Grant did in OTL. The Confederacy is self-destructing so fast that probably won't make a difference, though.

I agree on strategy. Kearny so far seems like a northern version of Lee. He thinks the war will be won or lost in the east.

Politically I wonder if Kearny has overstepped the mark yet. Lincoln sought his opinion on reconstruction and got it. In brutally frank terms but privately. Lincoln might disagree but Kearny hasn't publicised his views yet as far as I can see. But I think Kearny might be close to tripping up along the lines you suggest. If he starts pushing his agenda with Northern politicians or if his generals start handing out justice, on Kearny's terms, in occupied Virginia, well then I might agree Lincoln will need to give Kearny a shove.
 
I am currently swatting up on the Mexican Adventure and irregular warfare. In the meantime if anyone has any requests please let me know.

I am considering trying my hand at marking up a few maps to make following the battles easier as well.
 
My only request would be to let Geo. Thomas shine.

I haven't quite decided how the dynamic between Hooker, Richardson, Sheridan and Thomas will work yet. I am looking forward to Bull Richardson's first clash with Paddy Cleburne though! I'll have fun writing it though.
 
I am currently swatting up on the Mexican Adventure and irregular warfare. In the meantime if anyone has any requests please let me know.

I am considering trying my hand at marking up a few maps to make following the battles easier as well.
May I suggest making an overall timeline summarizing everything that's taken place to this point? It would make it easier to keep all of what's going on in context. (this would not replace what you are doing just act as a framework to see the overall picture.)

Looking forward too see what your maps look like.
 
Battle of Rappahannock

For those interested in the Battle of the Rappahannock from the very beginning of this TL I attach a map (my first amended map ever!) with the dispositions from the first morning as Pope chases what he believes to be a divided element of the Rebel army towards Culpeper Court House. He is in fact rushing into Lee's trap i.e. posts 7 through 22.

The second part of the battle may follow tomorrow I hope...

Rappahannock Battle Map August 25th Morning-Early Afternoon.jpg
 
Battle of the Rappahannock

Day 2 of the Battle (Posts 25-35). Burnside arrived with Reno's division the previous afternoon to support Von Steinwehr hold off Hill's attack. Lee now plans an attack on both flanks of the compressed Union line. He doesn't know Kearny has come up in the night with Richardson's and Hooker's Divisions. Sickles also arrives in time to save Reynolds. Schurz's and Shenk's Divisions were merged in the night and place under Humphreys the next morning.

Fought to a standstill by Kearny's reinforcements, Lee decides to disengage. Many believe Porter throws away Kearny's "victory" by refusing to aggressive pursue the Rebels...

Rappahannock Battle Map August 26th Morning.jpg
 
Are my stab at battlefield maps useful/helpful/embarrassingly bad? Views and criticism accepted. (I am using my bog standard version of Paint by the way)
 
Chapter Fifty-Six Mosby's Confederacy Part I
Chapter Fifty-Six

Mosby's Confederacy
Part I

From "Ghosts in the Valley" by Dr Guy Burchett
Ohio State 1987


"Following Mosby’s appointment in January 1863 his partisans began by ranging up and down the Valley. These operations were initially hampered by the sheer number of Union troops stationed in the Valley during the winter and spring, which equated with John F. Reynolds tenure as commander of the Dept. of the Valley. With the departure of Reynolds and the bulk of his troops to join Kearny’s Spring Offensive against Richmond, and the appointment of Franz Sigel to head the Dept, the opportunities for Mosby expanded rapidly…

General Lee hoped to distracted Kearny by threatening the Union position in the Valley. With that in mind John Imboden’s brigade of cavalry was dispatched from South West Virginia to carry out more substantive attacks on Union forces in the southern Shenandoah. Mosby was instructed to rendezvous with Imboden and assist…

Mosby is widely credited with formulating the plan that lured Sir Percy Wyndham’s Division into an ambush at Rockbridge Baths. Believing he had cornered an element of Mosby’s partisans, Wyndham foolishly, given the nature of the ground, ordered a charge by both the brigades of Duffie and di Cesnola…

The tactics of the battlefields of Europe served to little advantage against Southern carbines and shotguns fired from concealment. Wyndham’s men charged into a deadly crossfire of Imboden's troopers and Mosby's partizans…

The phrase “to take a bath” emanates from Wyndham’s defeat at the Rockbridge Baths and is widely used in military and sporting circles to refer to an overconfident force/team that is soundly defeated…

The victory secured Mosby’s reputation and promotion…"

320e522bee3b579d1a0b794988a045cd--action-pictures-civil-war-art.jpg

Two unfortunate Union Prisoners are questioned before Colonel Mosby

From “An Uncivil War” by Dr Guy Burchett
LSU


"Kearny’s decision to move on Richmond from the north and north west meant that he would be reliant on overland supply trains, rather than the sea borne supplies lines that had supported McClellan’s advance up the Peninsula. Those overland supply lines were vulnerable to precisely the kind of attacks in which Mosby’s, now expanded, partisan force specialised. Mosby’s moved out of the Valley into the area of northern Virginia between the District of Columbia and the rear of the Army of the Potomac. Thus was “Mosby’s Confederacy” was born…

Attempts to suppress both Mosby’s organised raids and more general irregular attacks by a handful of diehard rebels in northern Virginia proved extremely difficult for the Union. Mosby’s Confederacy stretched over four separate Departments: the Valley under Sigel, the Middle initially under Wallace and later under Couch, Washington D.C. under Heintzelman, and Kearny’s own theatre of operations…

Kearny reorganised his cavalry sending B.F. Davis’ Division north and taking Wyndham back into the Army of the Potomac. Davis was much better suited to the task. Critical supply trains were well guarded and supported by cavalry. However Davis was no more successful in engaging or capturing Mosby than his predecessor…

One of the more “unpleasant” elements of irregular warfare in the Valley and in Mosby’s Confederacy was the burning of homes in response to “rebel outrages”. Wyndham had unofficially pursued a policy of punishing those he held responsible for supporting partisans or irregulars by burning homes and farms…

hanging_drawing.jpg

Officers like Percy Wyndham, William Stebbins Fish and Hugh Judson Kilpatrick had no qualms about executing suspected bushwhackers and irregulars

Kearny’s Special Order 54 dealt with, among other things, the summary execution of rebel combatants taken under arms behind Union lines out of uniform. Some Union officers in northern Virginia took to the execution of the Order with a will, Hugh Judson Kilpatrick foremost among them...

Although Mosby’s partisans did fight in uniform, many of the irregulars in northern Virginia did not. On more than one occasion Mosby passed through a Virginia town to the spectacle of “hanged irregulars”. It was Mosby’s practice after this to hang “house-burners and Union lynchmen”. The war had taken an ugly turn in northern Virginia…"
 
Last edited:
According to the laws of war at the time of the ACW (and for references review the Lieber code) those not in uniform were not entitled to the protections due uniformed soldiers (whether "behind the lines" or not). Such folks would be more generally known as "Francs-Tireurs" following the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. Although this was long before the first Geneva Conventions, there were accepted norms/laws of war - and the execution of those who fought out of uniform (basically as murderers) was within those norms.

Note that the Confederate actions in executing Hunter, and the execution/enslavement of Negro soldiers (even those who were born free in the north) was most definitely AGAINST the laws of war of the time. And these actions have never been denounced by the CSA government nor the perpetrators punished.

Those soldiers executing irregulars and/or burning crops or buildings of those supporting Mosby et al are in fact carrying out LEGAL orders, and by hanging them in reprisal Mosby makes himself (and his subordinates) liable for court-martial.

IMHO in this time line after the Union wins we are going to see war crimes trials and they will include more than just the commandant of Andersonville. Furthermore this sort of thing can be easily used by US diplomats to further the distance between the CSA and foreign powers and to manipulate public opinion in Europe -"see how uncivilized the slave holders are..."
 
I would imagine young Kilcavalry isn't all that fussy about sorting out the irregulars from the civilians among whom they hide. If Kearny wants to punish the leadership of the South while sparing the commonfolk, he'll need to reign in chaps like Judson Kilpatrick.
 
An imperial law of 1868 gave to the Francs-Tireurs a formal status, but this law was ignored by the Prussians. Since I've not heard about an equivalent during the ACW, I would say that the Francs-tireurs of 1870 were more 'regular' than the partisans of Mosby.
 
Chapter Fifty-Seven Mosby's Confederacy Part II
Chapter Fifty-Seven

Mosby's Confederacy
Part II

From “An Uncivil War” by Dr Guy Burchett
LSU


"It was only after the fall of Richmond that Kearny felt comfortable releasing elements of Buford’s cavalry corps to assist in the suppression of rebel partisans in northern Virginia. Furthermore, with the fall of Richmond, the Armies of the Potomac and the James could again be primarily supplied by sea. This in turn released the cavalry commands of the various Departments to focus on “countering irregular elements north of Richmond” (an extract of Sigel’s orders to Colonel Copeland commanding the cavalry in the northern end of the Department of the Valley)…

Copeland’s small brigade was in the northern end of the Valley, Fish had a scratch brigade (more of a largish regiment) from the Middle Department, B.F. Davis’ and now Pleasanton’s Divisions were assigned to the new Department of Northern Virginia to help “suppress” Mosby…

In recent years historians have re-examined Mosby’s record. Many of the incidents relating to the execution of Union prisoners, sympathizers or negroes that were credited to Mosby are now considered to be the work of local irregulars, deserters and diehards. Nonetheless in the fall of 1863 Union troopers did not discriminate between Mosby’s partisans and the irregulars…

Of all the Union officers prowling around Mosby’s Confederacy Colonel Russell A. Alger of the 5th Michigan Cavalry showed the most talent for capturing partisans and flushing out irregulars. Alger was considered something of a military strategist and an excellent counterbalance to his more dashing brigade commander, George A. Custer…

RussellAlger.jpg

Colonel Russell A. Alger of Michigan

Alger's hatred for Mosby was personal. While Alger served with Copeland in the Valley in early 1863 in another Michigan regiment, a number of his command had been caught burning homes and had been executed by members of Mosby's command as war criminals. Alger never forgot nor forgave what had happened for though Mosby was not present at the time of the events, he had concurred with the actions of his men...

Mosby received intelligence that General George Armstrong Custer was going to spend the night at Fairfax County Courthouse with a minimal guard. Mosby planned a daring raid far inside Union lines to the courthouse in September 1863, to capture the Union officer. Alger wrote in his memoirs that Mosby burst into the bedroom to discover a dozen armed Union troopers and Alger. Mosby indignantly asked what this meant. Alger quickly asked if he had ever heard of "Russell Alger". Mosby replied, "Yes?" "I am Alger," the Union Colonel said "and you are my prisoner. Now be quick and make your peace with God." Thanks to Alger's "misinformation" Mosby and 29 of his men had been captured without firing a shot...

Alger's part in the Mosby legend was not over. Mosby had been captured in uniform, but Alger did not care. Mosby had hung Michigan troopers in uniform for simply carrying out their orders. John Singleton Mosby was hung from a tree outside the Courthouse. If anyone in the Union army considered taking action against Alger for this breach the roar of approval from the Northern press and public opinion made him effectively unassailable. Alger was a hero, particularly in Michigan, who's "sons he has avenged". However Alger's superiors Custer and Pleasanton wholly endorsed Alger's action. Only the Departmental commander, "Uncle" John Sedgewick seemed disturbed at Mosby's fate, but was encouraged by Kearny to "let the matter lie"..."
 
An amazing timeline you have here KI. While the Civil War has never been my strong point I can tell just how detailed and researched this TL is. One of the finest I've seen. Good job!
 
Wonder what Lee's response is going to be about this - he was one who was a strong believer in "playing by the rules". Unless this is dealt with by some sort of agreement by the 2 sides, especially the CSA granting Negro troops "official" status it will get worse...and you'll begin to see hostages taken to ensure good behavior/no irregulars. This will be almost all by Union forces as they take more CSA territory.

The execution of Hunter, and its endorsement by the CSA as well as the mistreatment of Union Negro soldiers has come back to haunt them big time.
 
Hmm, Mosby's command had killed some of my state's native sons? Then he deserves his fate. I assume the troopers that Mosby's men had executed were from the 1st Michigan Cavalry? I think that was the only Michigan unit operating in the Valley earlier in the war OTL. Alger was a governor of Michigan OTL, Should he survive the conflict I imagine he will be here as well. Unless of course some vengeful Confederate assassinates him.
 
Politically I wonder if Kearny has overstepped the mark yet. Lincoln sought his opinion on reconstruction and got it. In brutally frank terms but privately. Lincoln might disagree but Kearny hasn't publicised his views yet as far as I can see. But I think Kearny might be close to tripping up along the lines you suggest. If he starts pushing his agenda with Northern politicians or if his generals start handing out justice, on Kearny's terms, in occupied Virginia, well then I might agree Lincoln will need to give Kearny a shove.
The problem is how will the Army and public react if Lincoln does give Kearny a "shove"? Between Kearny's success and the atrocities committed by the CSA, Kearny will have a LOT of support, especially by Radical Republicans.
Lincoln's best move would be to thank Kearny for his advice then discuss his own views. IMHO Kearny is not a McClellan: he's never shown contempt for the president, he's been very successful against Lee, and he's shown no inclination to undercut the President.
As for Generals handing out punishment....
According to the laws of war at the time of the ACW (and for references review the Lieber code) those not in uniform were not entitled to the protections due uniformed soldiers (whether "behind the lines" or not). Such folks would be more generally known as "Francs-Tireurs" following the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. Although this was long before the first Geneva Conventions, there were accepted norms/laws of war - and the execution of those who fought out of uniform (basically as murderers) was within those norms.

Note that the Confederate actions in executing Hunter, and the execution/enslavement of Negro soldiers (even those who were born free in the north) was most definitely AGAINST the laws of war of the time. And these actions have never been denounced by the CSA government nor the perpetrators punished.

Those soldiers executing irregulars and/or burning crops or buildings of those supporting Mosby et al are in fact carrying out LEGAL orders, and by hanging them in reprisal Mosby makes himself (and his subordinates) liable for court-martial.

IMHO in this time line after the Union wins we are going to see war crimes trials and they will include more than just the commandant of Andersonville. Furthermore this sort of thing can be easily used by US diplomats to further the distance between the CSA and foreign powers and to manipulate public opinion in Europe -"see how uncivilized the slave holders are..."
....as we have seen with Colonel Alger, public and press approval would make punishing such officers all but impossible. As for Judson "KillCavalry", keep in mind that civilians harboring bushwackers are just as guilty as the bushwackers themselves.

By its actions, the CSA have branded themselves a bunch of outlaw reactionary rebels with little international support; under the circumstances, Lincoln's best move would be to temper Northern sentiments to focus on those who either actually committed or endorsed Southern atrocites.
 
Top