Do all boys get married? Does only the oldest get married and the rest go to church or are unmarried?
So the Austrian succession turns into the ITTL Spanish succession war? Now would there still be a pragmatic sanction if there were male Habsburgs from the Spanish branch? Probably one of Carlos' sons would go to Austria when Carlos VI saw that he probably would not have heirs , How do the French And prussian react?
contrary to popular belief, it was only with Friedrich the Great that Prussia became a power to worry about. And that was only because Bavaria was "neutered" after the WotAS for pretty much the rest of the century.How do the French And prussian react?
If the Austrian male line go extinct while Spain is still ruled by an Habsburg male line neither the daughters of Joseph I or Charles VI would have any right to the Austrian inheritance (they could get the officially elective crowns of Bohemia and Hungary but not Austria) but Leopold II would have no reason to get his sons to sign the OTL pactSo the Austrian succession turns into the ITTL Spanish succession war? Now would there still be a pragmatic sanction if there were male Habsburgs from the Spanish branch? Probably one of Carlos' sons would go to Austria when Carlos VI saw that he probably would not have heirs , How do the French And prussian react?
I see, so probably one of Carlos' younger sons would be sent to Austria? He will probably be married to an Austrian princess to also get the Bohemian and Hungarian crowns, right?If the Austrian male line go extinct while Spain is still ruled by an Habsburg male line neither the daughters of Joseph I or Charles VI would have any right to the Austrian inheritance (they could get the officially elective crowns of Bohemia and Hungary but not Austria) but Leopold II would have no reason to get his sons to sign the OTL pact
Inspired by this thread:
Carlos II, King of Spain [1665-1700] (1661-1700) m: 1679 Marie Louise d'Orléans (1662-1689)
Felipe V, King of Spain (b. 1680) m: 1698 Maria Elisabeth of Austria (b.1680)Carlos, Prince de los Asturias (1701-1705)José, Prince de los Asturias (b.1703) m: 1719 Maria Josepha of Austria (b.1699)Isabel Luisa (b.1705) m: 1720 Miguel I, King of Portugal [6] (b.1699)Leopoldo (b.1707)Ana Madalena (b.1708)Maria Enriqueta (b.1709)Juan [1], Governor of the Spanish Netherlands [from 1700] (b.1682) m: 1703 Adelaide of Savoy [4] (b.1691)Anne Marie (b.1706)Stillborn Daughter (1708)Adélaïde Louise (b.1711) m: 1725 Louis, Dauphin de France [7] (b.1709)Charles Amédée (b.1713) m: 1733 Maria Theresia of Austria (b.1716)Jean Joseph (b.1716)Stillborn Daughter (1684)Enrique [2], Viceroy of Naples (b.1685) m: 1702 Livia Odescalchi, Duchess of Bracciano [5] (b.1692)Enrico Clemente (1707-1709)Giovanni Casimiro (b.1709) 1m: 1722 Anne Marie Louise de France [7] (1705-1729); 2m: 1737 Maria Anna of Austria (b.1718)Stillborn Son (1713)Maria Teresa Livia (b.1715)Pedro [3] (1689-1709)[1] named for Juan of Austria who arranged Carlos and Marie Louise's marriage
[2] named for her mom, grandma
[3] named for his godfather, the king of Portugal, husband of his aunt, Anne Marie d'Orléans
[4] daughter of Vittorio Amadeo II, Duke of Savoy and his TTL wife, Anna Maria Luisa de Medici. Maria Elisabeth's sister, the OTL queen of Portugal goes to Paris for the duc de Bourgogne
[5] daughter of Livio Odescalchi, Duke of Bracciano and Teresa Kunigunde Sobieska (her brothers die without issue)
[6] son of Pedro II and Anne Marie d'Orléans
[7] children of TTL Louis XV (OTL duc de Bourgogne) and Maria Anna of Austria
They will likely all marryDo all boys get married? Does only the oldest get married and the rest go to church or are unmarried?
there had been several attempts at reform during Carlos II's reign. The problem with it was usually the reforms were advocated by D. Juan José- which meant that the Queen Regent (and her confessor,) blocked them (with the support of Austria). Juan José was pro-French, but because of the fact that France benefitted from a weaker Spain, Louis XIV never supported him against Mariana. Now...will Louis XIV support his niece's son's attempts at reforms against the Austrian party at court? Depends. Probably internal/minor reforms that can still benefit France by not strengthening Spain "too much". Carlos' son will have to be a prodigy to manage any of this before his grandmother dies in 1696 (when he'd be 16yo at the oldest), but that still leaves nearly 20 years that he'd have to fight against Louis XIV trying to take land from Spain.Not saying it would be impossible for the Haspburgs to reform but they're likely to be slower on doing it given they're already the established dynasty where stuff seems like they're still fine
Britain is not going to accept any French supremacy over the whole of their side of the Channel, and, bearing in mind how Marlborough trashed the French and the French military situation IOTL, I would not hold my breath hoping for a French miracle.If we consider that their kids will survive into adulthood and be able to rule,this will have several consequences down the line.
First of all, no war of Spanish Sucession or rather, we're likely to have a war but not one as big as OTL as France would feel cheated out of getting Spain and would go for the throat in getting the Spanish Netherlands and Italy, expect the usual opposition from the surrounding powers(Dutch, the HRE and maybe Britain if James II has been overthrow depending on the time Carlos II dies) and depending on how things go, France will either be partially or fully successfully in their conquests and depending on how it goes, the next generation is likely to continue the intrigues against Spain to further break away at their empire or turn their attention towards the HRE and try and get the left bank of the Rhine.
agreed, but if James II doesn't get deposed (James Francis Edward is stillborn or born a girl) then I don't see them getting involved. James won't ally with Louis (he distrusted the man as a general rule), but he won't necessary get involved in the matter either. In fact, it's suspected that James not getting involved in the 9YW OTL was one of the chief causes of the Glorious RevolutionBritain is not going to accept any French supremacy over the whole of their side of the Channel,
Yeah that is very ASB, especially because such a arrangement just leaves the Netherlands practically alone when the French come in, Spain always needed to keep a large army there and maintain close control specifically because the French were such a constant threat to the region, whereas places like Naples and Milan could afford to be ruled with a less tight hand.I almost want to say- and I suspect this might be borderline ASB at best- but the solution would be to "federalize" the empire while centralizing Spain. itself. Send a brother off to the Low Countries (Felipe IV planned to do this if he had a second son), but remove the raft of restrictions that Madrid generally put in place (usually the restrictions were a confidential letter to the ministers in Brussels to only respect orders from the viceroy which aligned with Madrid's). That way, the brother in the Low Countries would be able to directly respond to the French threat without having to check back with Madrid every time he wanted to put a fire out. It's not an ideal situation, but it would also relieve Madrid of the pressure to constantly have to worry about the Netherlands and France. Of course, Madrid would still keep foreign policy decisions in her own hands, but the Spanish Netherlands would be, for all intents and purposes, an independently functioning entity, rather than some "colony" waiting for Spain to get her house in order
Britain is not going to accept any French supremacy over the whole of their side of the Channel, and, bearing in mind how Marlborough trashed the French and the French military situation IOTL, I would not hold my breath hoping for a French miracle.
This, James might not like it but the French basically prop up his regime and knows they're the major ace he has in case things go south, so he won't do anything to oppose the French, meaning England is left out of the board while France advances. Even assuming a position where William sits on the throne, it will be much harder for them to try and reverse French gains them to keep them contained in their borders, and assuming the French managed to get the Spanish Netherlands, they have a free hand to deal with the Dutch(who they now share a direct border with) and the states on the left side of the Rhine.agreed, but if James II doesn't get deposed (James Francis Edward is stillborn or born a girl) then I don't see them getting involved. James won't ally with Louis (he distrusted the man as a general rule), but he won't necessary get involved in the matter either. In fact, it's suspected that James not getting involved in the 9YW OTL was one of the chief causes of the Glorious Revolution
hardly. Louis XIV was one of the staunchest backers of the opposition against James II's regime. In fact, it was Louis' expulsion of the Huguenots that caused dissent against James to rise. Because where did a lot of those Huguenots go? England. And the Huguenots brought with them the horror stories of Catholic, absolutist dragonnades to inflame the English anti-Catholicism to fever pitchThis, James might not like it but the French basically prop up his regime and knows they're the major ace he has in case things go south,
Even more reason for Louis to support James then. If nothing else, it will get those pesky Huguenots killed and ease a chip in his shoulderhardly. Louis XIV was one of the staunchest backers of the opposition against James II's regime. In fact, it was Louis' expulsion of the Huguenots that caused dissent against James to rise. Because where did a lot of those Huguenots go? England. And the Huguenots brought with them the horror stories of Catholic, absolutist dragonnades to inflame the English anti-Catholicism to fever pitch
What I meant was that the Huguenots going to England was an unforeseen consequence, not a grand evil scheme.Even more reason for Louis to support James then. If nothing else, it will get those pesky Huguenots killed and ease a chip in his shoulder
see, this is where we might differ. Until the Peace of Utrecht, Spain was taking soldiers from their Netherlandish possessions to form regiments in the Spanish army, then dispatching them to serve in Spain/Italy (Walse Brigade/Brigadia de Wallonia that helped Carlos III of Spain capture Naples in the 1730s being just one of them*). Then sending Spanish soldiers to the Netherlands. So the Spanish Netherlands were capable of fielding an army of their own (albeit probably peacetime numbers rather than in the event of a crisis), based on the fact that the Spanish army had something like five or six brigades/regiments filled with Catholic Netherlanders, plus six to eight "Royal Netherlandish" regiments/brigades serving with the Imperial Army.Yeah that is very ASB, especially because such a arrangement just leaves the Netherlands practically alone when the French come in, Spain always needed to keep a large army there and maintain close control specifically because the French were such a constant threat to the region, whereas places like Naples and Milan could afford to be ruled with a less tight hand.