The High Round and the Great Lakes
At the center of Tsaibwean political and social life was the High Round, an immense roughstone citadel which went through several periods of expansion, most notably between 910 and 920. Like most of its contemporaries, it was built on a mound consisting of centuries of deposits from prior settlements – attesting to a truly ancient pattern of habitation on the same site. However, it dwarfed its contemporaries – thick walls perhaps eight meters in height and two meters in width at their base.
Containing brick granaries and a large palace capable of sheltering many retainers and servants, the High Round represented a growing trend of wealth consolidation among the cattle-herding Bantu of Tsaibwe. Rich village headsmen grew richer, and began to aggregate additional herds under their control. Almost from the first, the Tsaibwe people had a clear notion of property rights and strict penalties for their violation, and their culture quickly deviated from the broader Bantu civilization. The agricultural package they utilized was fundamentally different, and had more in common with the temperate agriculture of the Watya cape. Cattle herding as well was marginal at best in many parts of the Bantu world, but was of critical importance to the Tsaibwe culture – as emphasized by Tsaibwean epics such as “The Raid of Ganhataundi” and their primordial religion, where carven cattle-totems played a significant role.
The accumulation of cattle as a tangible asset was quickly augmented by the accumulation of other more symbolic forms of wealth – glassware from as far away as Syria, gold jewelry, precious gems, and spices. While small private retainer-armies could be raised with the promise of food, a roof, and some training in arms, ceremonial treasures and cattle began encouraging many to seek the protection of local potentates and allowed the establishment of a quasi-feudal system where local chiefs functioned not merely as traditional arbitrators of justice and inter-clan disputes but now also as petty kings not unlike the “ring-givers” of Anglo-Dansk tradition.
At the top of this elaborate totem pole of loyalty stood the Chief of Tsaibwe, (the first of whom was the legendary Chivarwa Nzhou) who by right of conquest dominated a truly vast territory in a loose and decentralized union. One of the few things which enforced the great sprawl of the Tsaibwe empire, which otherwise might have easily succumb to rebellion, was that the Nzhou dynasty were one of the first to make widespread use of cavalry. In both monolithic reliefs and stele dated to the late eleventh century, the victories of horse-mounted warriors are celebrated in highly stylized graven images. Ritual images of the hunt are particularly popular as well in these depictions, and archeological evidence suggests that even the royal cattle-herdsmen were by the end of the century outfitted at least in part with horses.
Horse-mounted caravans tracked northwest from Tangasirabh, a coastal city state populated by a motley mix of Izaoriakan, Tamil, and Arab merchants. Enjoying de facto independence from its motherland, Tangasirabh grew rapidly under a policy of benign neglect and cooperation with the local coastal tribes, with whom it organized mutually beneficial trade deals. Most of the coastal peoples, despite being in large part cattle herders themselves, lacked quality sources of metal that the inland Tsaibwe peoples enjoyed.
The Tsaibwe did a great trade in imported luxuries, and in return added fuel to the fire of the gold trade, supplying vast quantities of the metal. To meet foreign demand for gold (as well as copper, iron, and pelts) certain lords among the Tsaibwe peoples posed to take advantage of this demand instituted a sort of corvee system. However, this should not be considered to be a radical overhaul of the Tsaibwe society, and labor-taxation (and taxation in general) did not become major facets of Tsaibwe society. The basic pattern of life in Iron-Age Tsaibwe was that of the subsistence farmer who, with his extended family, worked cultivated land directly owned by him and kept a small herd of cattle and other assorted livestock. The development of larger urban centers sustained by sharecroppers and defended by mounted retainers was a development which did not impact the lifestyle of the average rural agriculturalist and, due to the laissez faire attitude of his notional rulers, would not for some time. And yet it would be foolish to ignore the development of centralized rule and the first halting steps towards urbanization as anything less than a paradigm shift.
The tenth century is known primarily for the Indianization of the Savahila peoples, and also marks the beginning of the development of regional identities. The newcomers from Bharukaccha and Kannada called in their own language the whole of the Savahila country words which ultimately were corrupted in the Savahila tongue into “Kapudesa” or “Pazudesada” – meaning black and west country respectively. These terms stuck, and Savahila, a corruption of the Arab word for coast, began to fall out of favor. While historians still referred to the “Savahila cities” it became an increasing anachronism as the cities began to assert their own distinctive cultures, shaped by the varying immigrant communities and local tribes which comprised their populations.
The “Kapudesa era” is characterized by the spread of the guild system and its increasing interconnectedness with the Sreni of India. Despite the large travel times and associated risks, links and alliances were nevertheless popular, and the politics of India came to exert a large impact on the Savahila. Trade continued to grow, and although the availability of gold, particularly in the hands of the Sakalava monarchy and aristocracy, was driving a curious and never-before-seen trade imbalance and a dangerous inflationary trend, for foreign guild merchants this was nothing but a boon whose long-term economic consequences were difficult to predict.
The Kw’adza, a Cushitic people who dominated the highlands and the Wembere river region were forming increasingly complex polities, absorbing fellow tribes such as the Sirikwa into their hegemony. Advanced irrigation and cultivation techniques, learned from the Savahila, allowed for a population boom and the displacement of hunter-gatherers and the previously advancing Bantu tribes such as the Takama. Their tribal leaders, known as Sahs, (perhaps a corruption of the Iranian Shah) were first unified by a semi-legendary king, Jirata, sometime in the late ninth century. The extent of this unification is difficult to determine, and unlike the Tsaibwe, the Cushitic peoples did not build large fortified palaces to the same scale, nor did their rulers leave impressive monuments. Most records of the reign of Jirata conflict – perhaps implying the existence of several kings named Jirata across the tenth century.
Jirata, like some of his predecessors, waged war against their neighbors who also traded with the Mzishima, bringing the Ma’a and the Ruvu into his sphere of influence as tributaries – but it seems that he had little ambition to attack the city of Mzishima or its more coastal allies. The Mzishima forts seem to have gone unmolested – there are no records or evidence of any major attacks against them. Jirata and his successors were clever. The easterners were wealthy and numerous, even if they did cling to the coastlines. Jirata and his people did not make great use of horses – the tsetse fly was too great a threat in many parts of their hegemony. Rather, their warriors were generally equipped with throwing spears and hand axes, and their nobility went into battle in leather and scale armor. This armor, along with innovative tactics and large-scale population growth, particularly along the rivers, changed the power dynamic.
At once concerned and fascinated by this new possible threat, Mzishima entered into a tight league of alliance with her neighbors, laying the foundation for the later Kapudesa Equal-Kingdom. However, the Savahilans did not come to blows with the Kw’adza. Rather, a “Sah Jirata” sometime around 950, according to Savahilan history, ‘accepted the great god Ishvara as the manifestation of truth.’ Hinduism among the Mzishima, as with the rest of Savahila, was deeply influenced by both the ecstatic and meditative form of the religion practiced among the Izaoriaka and also a variety of devotional sects which had largely fallen out of favor on the Hindu mainland.
Emphasizing a personal relationship with a single deity often called Ishvara, the devotional movements had come into conflict with pluralistic and nondualistic philosophies dominant on the subcontinent, with their dizzyingly vast pantheons and Buddhist-inspired teachings. Accordingly, they had fled to the Western Country, where they found many eager converts and sympathizers among the Zoroastrians and Arabian pagans as well as their own countrymen – and eventually the peoples of the interior.
Devotionalism was a profoundly appealing religion to a ruler seeking to unify a people under a single monarch. Just as the old gods were revealed to be aspects of the new, so were old chiefs revealed to be aspects of the new king. While it is impossible to measure the spread of the new religion, many of its practitioners left the comfort of the coastal cities and journeyed inland. For the Kw’adza, it was an era of religious fervor and social upheaval.
Meanwhile, further inland and to the north, the Ganda Kingdom simultaneously had its own mythic king (or Abakama) Murindwa, about whom even less is known. From the Bakopi clan, he failed to establish a dynasty before being overthrown by his advisor, a commoner named Iasaza, but he established the capital of Kakiziba on the shores of Lake Nyanza, and, according to oral tradition, many other cities, of which little actual evidence exists. The urban settlements of the Ganda kingdom were large compared to their neighbors, but numbered at most in the thousands. Traditionally, local extended families linked themselves to other extended families through ceremonial brothership, creating larger clans with leaders chosen by the patriarchs of constituent families. These clans defined the lands in which they lived – literally, with the territory of Busiita run by the Basiita family and so on. Urbanization had changed that notion. City-dwelling Kings amassed power to themselves independently of these antique structures.
That Iasaza, a commoner with no particular patrimony, was able to become King is a perfect example. He was known to the soldiers and clan leaders whose support he depended upon, and the institution of kingship was able to transcend clan affiliation. However, this does not mean that it transcended politics – the clan leaders on Iasaza’s death were able to choose an heir from among his children, ignoring his interests. Still, despite migrations by the Maa people [not to be confused with the Ma’a] and the Takama, the peoples of Nyanza were able to see off these invaders and retain their culture, which blended some Cushitic elements with the Bantu majority of the region. The Ganda culture was a resilient one, and by late tenth century that they began imitating the irrigation systems of their southern neighbors. Sizable stone buildings emerged, large meeting-halls and princely palaces, along with granaries and marketplaces.
Religious buildings, however, were absent. Religion was a matter of tradition and ancestor-worship, and unlike the Kw’adza, the Ganda repudiated the Devotionalist missionaries who braved disease and hardship to reach their interior country. Ruhanga, their supreme god, was an absent figure who was not due direct worship. The Buddhist monks who they occasionally encountered in their travels presented a more compelling set of ideas, and one which integrated to a greater degree with their existing faith. However, unlike in Eurasia, the Buddhist missionaries, primarily Arab, found Ganda a more inhospitable place to remain and preach, and accordingly were few and far between. The highlands to the south were a more ideal climate, but there monotheism already had a foothold and the Buddhists won few disciples.