Neat. :cool: So much of the Arab migrations of TTL are spread more to the south rather than west. I think that the mix of Hawiya Arabs and Aksumites in East Africa will not just disappear in 20 years time... they will tend to disperse south into the fledgling states of East Africa.

What is the relationship of the Heshanid's church to the church in Ethiopia?
 
Awesome update. Is this an OTL climate change btw or is it caused by butterflies?
i like how you narrated this Great tragedy...
 
The Patriarch in Alexandria still has at least nominal control over the Aksumite church. As with Makuria, there's a regular flow of priests south to spread the word and ensure doctrinal purity. However given the distances such appointments tend to be long term.

To some degree the native priesthood, especially in Makuria, resents this outside influence but it's useful politically to the monarchs as a method to counteract the power of native priests.

The climate changes are OTL. In general I don't think in going to let butterflies screw with the climate. That would just confuse everything too much. However, in this case as in others, human actions can exacerbate an otherwise mild decline. Here, the Hawiya drag a much larger part of Ethiopia down with them than in our timeline, where the pastoralist clans never gained control of the highlands.
 
http://i.imgur.com/74rc3RY.jpg


Aaaand here's a map! Let none question the power of the Aghatsaghid Shahdom, which still controls a vast territory as you can see, including most of Iran.

The other polity on this map I've given limited attention to is the Padivayanate of Syria, a weird state. Nominally speaking it's an exclave of the Aghatsaghids under the latest Viceroy of Syria, Anagui. Practically speaking that makes no sense and Anagui doesn't provide any tribute to the Aghatsaghids anyways.

Independent Armenia is ruled by King Ashot Kamsarakan and a council of important nobles who have a lot of functional power - Armenia is a very decentralized country with a lot of different ethnic groups, Alan, Eftal, and otherwise all sharing territory. The rise to pre-eminence of the native Armenians is something of a historical oddity in this timeline, and can be explained by certain families which can trace their lineage back to the Pahlava themselves managing to cling to power.
 
Have the Vikings turned their eyes to the British Isles or is their attention focused on the East? I ask this because I'm interested in how the resulting Anglo-Norse hybrid culture would look like.

I wonder how Eastern Europe will turn out without Russia to dominate the region for centuries. Especially the Polish.

Why did you/they change the name of the Empire of Asiana? I thought that that name was much better than what it's got now. It's seriously disappointing me. I had a slight hand in adjusting that name and it's been removed.
 
Have the Vikings turned their eyes to the British Isles or is their attention focused on the East? I ask this because I'm interested in how the resulting Anglo-Norse hybrid culture would look like.

The Vikings are raiding both at this juncture. There are settlements in Ireland and Scotland as OTL - and in England the Pentarchy is having as many problems dealing with the Norse as the Heptarchy did in our timeline.

I wonder how Eastern Europe will turn out without Russia to dominate the region for centuries. Especially the Polish.

You'll see.

Why did you/they change the name of the Empire of Asiana? I thought that that name was much better than what it's got now. It's seriously disappointing me. I had a slight hand in adjusting that name and it's been removed.

Franco-Roman Empire is a name rather like that of the Byzantine Empire. Nobody contemporary would call it that. Imperator Carolus calls himself "Emperor of the Romans, King of Asiana and Galatia" and probably a few other superfluous titles. The Roman Emperor in Florentia sees him as a usurper and a pretender, and he sees the Emperor in Florentia as merely a Western Roman Emperor to his Eastern Empire. The reason for the name change is that the nation you're referring to was the Kingdom of Asiana. Mansuetus was the first King of Asiana to refer to himself also as Emperor of the Romans after the succession crisis in the Severian Empire and his father's inheriting Thrace and Constantinople.

I apologize for changing it, but currently the only way to claim a title larger than kingship is through the legacy of the Roman Empire.
 
So that means that nobody at the time refereed to them as that? I guess they might prefer to refer to the country as "Asiana". That's good. The name "Asiana" would be part of a new regional culture that's neither Roman or Frankish, but a mixture of both. With a little Christianized "Ifthal" thrown in to taste.

And does that mean that we'll see Eastern Europe again soon? Will Polonia get borders soon?

And will the Kirichan go the way of the Golden Horde or will they survive?
 
I generally dislike giving spoilers for future posts, but Polonia will get border shortly. As I said in my last post, I would like to cover the Roman Empire and West Africa next, but I have a Slavic update planned after that.

The Khirichan, unlike the Golden Horde are a decently well-organized state with a backbone of sedentary agriculture and a good number of proper cities. This will undoubtedly be relevant for their longevity. Tributary raids are a minor part of their economy, although the impact of slavers on the Slavic tribes shouldn't be discounted entirely.
 
Last edited:
Asterius
West Africa from 700-850

It is common among historians to view West Africa through the context of the North African Berber civilizations with which they had increasing contact through the eighth century. Elements of various Berber tribes had begun moving south, utilizing camels to cross the great desert in increasing numbers. These early trade lanes would grow rapidly, spurring the genesis of oasis communities. Cities such as Sijilmasa, Teghaza, and Audaghust became important hubs and independent polities in their own right - linked by their critical importance as way stations but otherwise autonomous from the decentralized Berbers to their north.

Two tribes, the Iznagen and the Hawwata would ultimately come to dominate the northern ends of these trade lanes through sheer numbers, displacing the Tuaregs. Those with little to lose often left their native tribal lands and joined up as caravan hands or guards, riding southwest to the great city of Tafilalt to sign on and make their journey across the wide desert. Further south the Tuaregs remained pre-eminent. Although they were Berbers like the Iznagen, their religion, language, and social structure were all distinct, taking on influences from Ghana to the south and the hard necessity of their homelands, which were far more marginal than the rich pastureland of the Mediterranean world.

The city-state empire of Ghana remained predominant across a broad swathe of the Niger river valley. While armies of iron-armed horsemen had carved out the Ghana Empire, what maintained it was salt, slaves, and gold. By their stranglehold on tariffs levied from the importation of northern goods and their ability to control brigandage and caravan-raiders, Ghana moved from a military hegemony to a proper state. They conducted river tolls and censuses, and levied taxes and corvee-style labor on their people. Administration was done in a modified version of the Berber script. Where this was not sufficient, the King relied on strict etiquette and elaborate ritual to separate himself from the common people as an almost divine figure.

Empires such as Gao and Takrur imitated these practices. Curiously, the West African notion of sovereignty was far looser and more pluralistic than the standard of Mediterranean states. Accordingly, the Ghanan and Gao empires frequently overlapped in their claims - something which led to sporadic border-wars in which relatively little was at stake. These wars more than anything allowed both powers to maintain military readiness and prevent their soldier classes from falling into sloth. These West African states also had a clear grasp of economics - while they were dependent on Berber trade in salt, the Ghanan kings hoarded gold in vast quantities, keeping the price from depressing and keeping it out of the market. From there, the salt they gathered was traded to the entirety of West Africa in what was effectively a royal monopoly owned by Ghana.

The first Christian and Gnostic missionaries arrived sometime after the beginning of the ninth century, but unlike in Kanem, where the King cautiously and nominally was willing to embrace Christ, the rulers of cities such as Ghana, Gao, and Takrur had far too much of their power invested in traditional Mande religion, which granted them divine legitimacy. That the Berbers themselves were either pagans or syncretic Christians at best was the final straw - there was no economic incentive to abandon their traditional gods.

To the south, in the rising commonality of iron tools and the explosion of the blacksmith class as a distinct social group from the artisan class enabled mass brush-clearing and in turn agricultural surpluses such as never before. Kingdoms such as Akan, Taruga, and Benin underwent a wave of urbanization unseen in prior generations, and with this came mass production and specialization of labor. Professional artisans provided in turn a surplus of trade goods and allowed the Nigerian kingdoms to connect themselves to the growing trade network across Western Africa.

Foremost of the beneficiaries of this urbanization and interconnectedness was Ukwu, on the Niger-Chadda confluence. The Yoruba, their neighbors, by 750 were suffering from regularly exacerbated communal rivalries which had long reduced Ife to a ceremonial capital and little more. Their hierarchal social structure concentrated all wealth and power in the hands of a few tribal elites, who in turn militarized their city-states in an attempt to retain this power. Yoruba power politics became a zero-sum game, and ultimately these rivalries allowed the Ukwu to step in and subjugate the Yoruba cities one by one. As the Yoruba declined the Ukwu rose in prominence and became hegemony over the walled cities of the Yoruba. Taking lessons from the Yoruba, the Ukwu Empire maintained the same lofty religious and cultural separation of the ruling elite, and although they allowed the pseudo-democratic title-taking practices to persist among their subjects, kingship became a semi-divine and hereditary rank.

There is no native record of the arrival of the first Savahila merchants in either Takrur or Benin. Accordingly this had led some historians to assume that the earliest Mzishima expeditions are either fraudulent or exaggerated. After all, the Izaoriaka, who were arguably better mariners in general did not travel far past Cape Watya, especially after gold and diamonds were discovered on the Cape. The historical record consists entirely of the self-aggrandizing records of Savahila ayat-ministers whose tales might well have been retroactively embellished with true details.

However, even if these early expeditions failed or are the invention of later generations, Cape Watya did provide a jumping-off point for a later series of expeditions beginning in 830. Of these there is more record. Ukwu oral histories record the arrival of the "Southern People" and based on other factors in these histories it can be deduced that they refer to the later expeditions from Savahila. While the impact of these adventurers was minimal, as tales of the Southern People spread, they further expanded the worldview of the average West African. Increasingly there was a notion among the educated that the world was vast - no longer was Ghana considered a center of the world around which so much revolved. Painful as it might have been for the Kings of Ghana, they understood that they were but one power among many.

The Kings of Ghana would accordingly begin exploration of their own, sending emissaries north to the Berber homelands and east beyond Kanem.

Rome in the reign of Asterius and Giorgius

"The seat of the true Emperor," Nicolus of Tarentum wrote of Florentia in 823, "is the most well-ordered city in the world. You would be forgiven if you mistook it for an armed camp on some frontier. Everywhere are uniformed officials and armed men in ranged in ranks." Florentia, ordered and defined by the military bureaucracy of the Empire however, had already entered a sort of decline by the time of Nicolus' visit. The Imperial bureaucracy which had sufficed to manage northern Italy in the era of the Isidorians had grown unwieldy and vast. The units stationed in the city were primarily palace guards whose day to day readiness was terrible compared to the troops on the frontier.

Asterius had won Imperial title through force of arms as Magister Militum, but he was cut of a different sort of cloth than many previous officers. He owed his rank to his ability to play politics and cultivate positive relationship. If the Roman bureaucracy was meritocratic it was also deeply corrupt. Patronage had seen Asterius rise rapidly, gaining and dispensing favors until with Severus' death he had been able to seize power. Most of all, Asterius was keen on reducing the power of provincial Legates, most of whom distrusted him. He created additional layers of bureaucracy, refusing to concentrate power. His Magisters were a series of lackeys with uninspiring records, and he stuffed the bureaucracy with sycophantic yes-men.

Two years after his marriage to the young Theodora, she produced a son, Giorgius Constans, and a three years later two daughters, Flavia and Irena, of which neither would grow to adulthood. Giorgius as well was unhealthy, prone to bouts of fever. But the dynasty was secure. Theodora would continue to bear children, of which only one other, also named Flavia, would grow to adulthood. Asterius was deeply concerned with his legacy. Severus' inability to provide a clear succession had been his undoing, and Asterius had a feeling that Giorgius would be every bit as unpopular with the army as he was.

To subvert any such weakness, in the year 818, Giorgius was made co-Emperor at the unprecedentedly young age of thirteen. As a young man, Giorgius proved more healthy than in his childhood, but being groomed for the Purple had left him a rather unpleasant person and a feeble leader, steeped in his father's paranoia and utterly devoid of the military credentials the Roman establishment expected. When Asterius passed away unexpectedly in 831, Giorgius was left in sole command of the Empire. The bureaucracy had for some time, even as it was undercut by Asterius, provided for the maintenance of the Empire.

Giorgius managed to alienate many key figures within quick succession. Imbert the White, the Frankish Mayor of the Palace, became convinced after a state visit to Florentia that the Romans intended to go to war with Francia. Giorgius distrusted the Slavic lords in the Balkans, not realizing that their support was a key and oft-overlooked counterweight to the power of the military establishment. He expected the Pope to operate at his pleasure, and quickly managed to turn the clergy of Rome against him as well.

However, there was simply no-one to replace him. His sister Flavia had gone into monastic life, perhaps to escape the influence of her parents, and the Legates and Magistrates from which pretender Emperors typically emerged had been heavily hamstrung by Asterius. For obvious reasons, this weakening of the frontier military was dangerous. The Khirichan and Xasar were once again resurgent, having weathered the storm of the Votive Wars. While they did not immediately return to their former ambitions of raiding all Europe, they proved that the Roman frontier from Makedonia to Illyria was deeply porous. Inept Roman Legates struggled to reign in the Turkic brigands who struck as far south as Thermopylae - a retaliatory invasion in 837 was defeated outside the gates of Srem. A mountain of Roman skulls was set outside the city.

In what would be a disastrous threat to the Romans, this incursion convinced the young Khagan Sebouk Arslan of the Roman threat. He sent emissaries to Florentia demanding tribute in compensation for the "damage" their army had inflicted, promising war if they did not accept his demands. Giorgius, afraid to look weak in front of his military men and confident in the Roman legions, refused his demands outright and ordered the ambassador executed.
The Romans were utterly unprepared for the coming storm. The army which rode south was not a simple horde of nomadic raiders, bent on destruction and banditry, but rather a complete force with a lengthy siege train. Sebouk Arslan struck south and defeated two full Roman armies in successive battles at Naissus and Salona. After these rapid victories, he turned south and sacked Thessalonica, Larissa, Skoupus, and Dyrrachium.

With the crisis reaching a fever pitch, Giorgius was forced to march out with yet a third army, drawn mostly from the troops guarding the Frankish border, where tensions had been high until very recently (the Franks recently had marched north to deal with a Viking army attacking Paris). Sebouk Arslan lured this latest army into one of his famous feigned retreats before surrounding and massacring it. Capturing the Roman camp, he emerged victorious with many trophies, including many holy relics - a splinter of the True Cross, and what was supposedly the Holy Lance, carried into battle by the devout Romans. Giorgius, depending on the account either was slain in battle or barely escaped, only to be murdered by his own guardsmen.

It is not for no reason that 838 is considered one of the darkest years for Western Christendom. The historians and scholars of the time found themselves asking what sins had been so great as to see Rome humiliated and Paris sacked. Everywhere pagans seemed dominant. By the end of the year, Sebouk Arslan was camped in Utinum, planning to invade Italy itself in the next campaigning season. Given that he clearly had demonstrated the logistical capacity to besiege and take walled cities, fear was rampant among the Romans. Word of the Emperor's death prompted the Extraordinary Magistrate of Sicily, a man named Sebastianus Jovinus, a Mauri by birth, to ride north with a company of soldiers and, shortly after meeting with the Pope be crowned Emperor and named Defender of Christendom.

Sebastianus did not rest. He regained contact with scattered Roman commands and the Slavic federates in the Balkans and rallied his surviving armies to prepare to repulse the Turks. However, the Romans were simply too weak to resist the Turks in the field. Falling back to Florentia, Sebastianus prepared for a siege which never came. Sebouk Arslan circumvented the city and marched directly on Rome, hoping to draw the Romans into the field by threatening the holy city and defeat them in a field battle. His previous successes in sieges had depended upon the Romans having been humiliated in the field first.

Italy was a region largely spared the horrors of raiding armies and pillage. As such it was a rich land, and the defenses of the region were often in poor condition. Even Rome was ill-prepared for the coming assault. Despite a heroic defense, the city was plundered and set alight. The Pope and most of the clergy had escaped beforehand, but the destruction of the city was a potent symbolic blow to the power of the Roman Empire. For the remainder of the year, the Khirichan armies would rampage across Italy before finally withdrawing back to Utinum.

The following year, Sebastianus would agree to pay tribute to the Turks in exchange for the Khirichan withdrawl. Sebouk Arslan's invasion had proved the weakness of the Roman Empire, but little more. If the Khagan had meant to make permanent conquests, he was frustrated in that endeavor. It was a relatively simple thing to raid and even to take cities - but the broader strategic realities were simply against the Turks. No matter how capable their armies were or how well led, they were operating far from home and primarily were motivated by the prospect of plunder. Sustainable conquest would have involved garrisons and the occupation of a vast hostile territory that regarded them as pagans and devils.

However, the damage to the Roman Empire was real and very much crippling. Only time would tell if they could recover.


[I confess I introduced something of a random element to decide how effective Sebouk Arslan (you may remember him as
[FONT=&quot]Khagan Shiqar Ishbaroglu Sevuqharslan) would be on his campaign. Turns out he is a tactical genius and the Romans were doomed from the beginning. But the likelihood of the Xasar, let alone the Turks, making major inroads into the Balkans seems slight.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The wars between the Christian world and everyone else have a feeling like a pendulum to me. Christendom was getting hammered by the Eftal and then the Votivists swept them away. Now the Turks go rampaging through Europe once again.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Next post will touch on the Slavs and something else that I have yet to determine. ] [/FONT]
 
Well damn, That is going to be hard to make it back from.

Great Update! :p

Are the developments in West Africa significantly different from OTL, have to say i lack knowledge of the area at this time.

How long is Arslan going to be a figure? Is he a young warlord on the rise, or is he nearing the end?

I love the element of randomness you brought to the success of Arslan, and yet making it all seem plausible.

I really wish i knew more about Budhism, not knowing more makes it hard to follow some of the religious developments at times :(

I look forward to your next update! Keep it up :D
 
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Are the developments in West Africa significantly different from OTL, have to say i lack knowledge of the area at this time.
There is one significant difference - and that is that Islam doesn't exist. A West Africa without Islam is going to develop along significantly different lines, especially as, in my opinion, the Berbers, particularly those of the interior are probably not going to convert en masse to Christianity. What this means is that traditional religion and religious figures will be press-ganged in providing the monarchy's legitimacy.

How long is Arslan going to be a figure? Is he a young warlord on the rise, or is he nearing the end?
Arlsan is 28 as of the campaign in question. He inherited the throne at 22 as the eldest of his father [FONT=&quot]Ishb[FONT=&quot]ar Khagan's[/FONT][/FONT] sons. He still has much of his life ahead of him, but he's limited in what he can accomplish by a lot of the factors I've expressed in the above post. His skill and capabilities are going to be somewhat squandered, I expect - but if he's lucky he'll at least get to be a famous Attila-the-hun type figure.

I wish I knew more about Buddhism. I've done a good bit of research for this timeline, but my learning about Buddhism is complicated by the fact that most of the major Buddhist sects in the west in this timeline are based off of a type of Buddhism we don't know as much about in reality.

As I've expressed, describing a hypothetical Buddhism filtered through Iran into the Slavic tribes of Poland or into the Norse civilization is a really weird thing. One thing that occurs to me is that it's plausible the Slavs have tried to equate the various Iranian gods that are by now firmly enmeshed with western Buddhism into their own deities. In some cases this might be easier than others. You might expect to see a Mihir-Dazbog or a Perun-Ohrmazd or something. Some god might take on aspects of Shiva (one of the weird parts of Iranian Buddhism is the worship of Shiva as a sort of example of a transcendent deity, stripped of his role in the Hindu pantheon) and the Buddha might be worshiped as things are lost in translation.

The biggest change I think you'd expect to see is the royal patronage of monks and teachers as opposed to the forest temples. This might cause social strife, unless the royals are smart enough to really play up how people can keep their gods. That's the big advantage over Christianity, where you don't get to keep your gods, except maybe as saints or folk heroes.
 
Well damn, That is going to be hard to make it back from.

Great Update! :p

Are the developments in West Africa significantly different from OTL, have to say i lack knowledge of the area at this time.

Thought I'd chime in since I like to read up on the Sahel kingdoms a lot.

One of the largest changes on the area is the fact that Islam does not exist to unify the diverse Berbers into as powerful a force as OTL.
There are no arabs and arabized berbers that hold hegemony in north africa and its trade routes. This means the Berbers will probably not enjoy as much of a powerful position as they had as being main bulk of the Almoravids.

The benefit is that the Berbers have a much more indigenous culture and subjugation from foreign elements isn't really concern here. It might take longer or be harder than it would have otherwise, but they'll establish polities of their own by their own efforts. Much more than OTL at least.

The lack of Islam as a unifying force for otherwise disparate tribes and groups of Berbers means they're less cohesive than they would have been in OTL. It's a big trade-off. The likelihood of tribe being played against tribe in regards to trade routes goes up as well.

The other change is the dynamic between West and North Africa.
In OTL, the influence and control of marketplaces by Arabs and Berbers was facilitated by Islam. That, along with the fact that many of the trade routes were becoming increasingly locked down by Muslims, meant that Sahelian rulers had to dance a fine line between appeasing their pagan subjects and maintaining relations with Muslims who had increasingly more sway over trade routes.

Ghana in OTL ultimately fell to subjugation because of their weakened monopoly on the Trans-Saharan trade routes, the power growth of states around, and the power of Islam's influence internally and externally. The other states that managed to play this game better were the ones that eventually took hold over trade routes, tested Ghana's hegemony or expanded at its expense.

In TTL, Ghana has got a longer lease on life and no Islamic juggernaut there to undermine its control of trade routes, power, or borders. The only thing to worry about are the surrounding states or nomads that will try to undermine their power. It should also be noted that instead of North Africa to Sahel-Sub-Saharan dynamic of power, the Sahel will most likely have more leverage and domination in the relationship.

On the other-hand, we already see the Tuareg falling increasingly under the sway of Ghana too, so I assume that Berbers will have a lot more Mande influence. Or maybe there will be more of a two way exchange between Mande and Tuareg than in OTL. It seems like in the long term, they'll out-compete the others surrounding states because of their hard/soft-power as well.

Oh, and the modified Berber script will get a lot more traction in West Africa too. It seems to have taken the place of Ajami (Arabic modified script).

Sorry if that was a little long.

:eek::eek:
 
Last edited:
Ah, that was a great summary Orisha! (and much more in depth than mine)

Also, Merry Christmas all. Or in this timeline you might alternatively be hoping for a good Jol, Korocun, Lohri, or Maidyarem (well actually I think the solstice was inauspicious for the Iranians but still).
 
Thank you both for the explanation. I love learning more about West Africa and it is going to be interesting to see the changes from OTL.

Merry Christmas all :D
 
Ah, that was a great summary Orisha! (and much more in depth than mine)

Also, Merry Christmas all. Or in this timeline you might alternatively be hoping for a good Jol, Korocun, Lohri, or Maidyarem (well actually I think the solstice was inauspicious for the Iranians but still).

No Prob. Always found the region interesting enough to read up on.

Have a Happy Holiday.

Thank you both for the explanation. I love learning more about West Africa and it is going to be interesting to see the changes from OTL.

Merry Christmas all :D

Glad I could help.

Happy Holiday.
 
Indos
The birth of the western Slavic states

The ninth century was a time of increasing centralization for the western Slavic peoples. The tribal identities which had characterized their governments up until this time remained important but slowly lost precedence in favor of strong central authority which was more capable of responding to incursions by the Christian Germanic dukes.

The most well-documented of these central authorities was the King of Great Moravia, Moymir (Saint Moymir the Great) Ascending the throne in 840, within two years he personally converted to Christianity, establishing Bishoprics in both Nitra and Praha. Accordingly, his life has been the subject of many legends and exaggerations, relating to the famous riverine baptism of his nobles and his many wars against the pagans of his own kingdom. What we can learn from these legends is that his Christianization policies were met with strong internal resistance. Becoming a Christian lessened the pressure from the west but it threatened on many occasions to tear the young kingdom of Moravia apart entirely.

Moravia was organized, in contrast to the Wendish or Polish kingdoms, in imitation of her Frankish neighbors. The Kral of Moravia was called by the German princes a "Duke" and his retainers worked in a similar style to the magisters and palatine counts of the Frankish realm. However, if Moymir was a patron of Christendom, he did not employ these magistrates in the persecution of the old Slavic religion - quite the opposite, indeed. The forest temples and holy sites of their faith were preserved and untarnished for at least several more decades, before slowly mounting social pressure from a growing population of genuine converts saw the majority of the sites abandoned and traditional rituals replaced by Christian practices.

Mostly, the Moravian state is understood by way of its diplomatic ties to the Christian world. A royal marriage with the Duke of Bavaria, an acknowledgement of its (nominal) subordination to the Frankish King. We have scant historical records. As the frontier of Latin Christendom moved east, communities of Cassiodorian monks would establish communities in the vast hinterlands of Moravia, providing some of the clearest views of the Moravian society in transition. The fortified hill-towns were gradually pushing their boundaries - suburban communities gathered outside the traditional walls and established rough palisade barriers on the low terrain beyond their houses. In time, monasteries and churches would become equally important centers of communities.

To the east of Moravia, on the broad plains of Polans, a different sort of consolidation was taking place, based not around Christianity but Buddhism. Since at least the 800s, there had been small but influential Buddhist communities on the Vistula river - the religion had some four decades to synthesize with local beliefs and customs before King Czcibor of Polans united the "people of the plains" under his own banner. In some senses, Slavic Buddhism was a purer version of the Hinayana creed that had gained early popularity on the Vistula. Brought directly by travelling monks and missionaries, it did not carry as much of the baggage of Iranian paganism, and where it did, it was quick to draw comparisons between Iranian deities and the local Slavic ones. Buddhism, like Christianity, provided a social glue to unite local tribes into a larger framework.

Unlike Moymir, Czcibor conquered his kingdom at sword-point. It was only after the last of these conquests, in 853, that he began to promote Buddhism. Stone monuments from the time period speak of the edicts of the "Emperor and champion of the dharma" and describe the Czcibor's "universal rule" - a true revolution in the language used to describe Kings. Czcibor seems to have repudiated offensive war shortly after his conversion. Conveniently he had already conquered a vast empire, and settling down to manage it was perhaps a prudent action.

Alone of the Western Slavs, the Wendish, or Veleti Kingdom, did not abandon its traditional religion or social structure. It could not afford to - the Wendish king had less authority than his counterparts in Poland or Moravia. His authority directly stemmed from the Slavic priesthood and the rituals which preserved the social unity of his people. Furthermore, among the Veleti there was no single potent tribe which could establish a dominant or hegemonic role. The Veleti "High King" was chosen from a weak tribe, theCircipani. He could only act with the complicity of one or more of the greater tribes - meaning he could generally only act when the entire confederal system came under direct existential threat.

Existential threats were rare. The almost total annihilation of the pagan Saxons had shocked the Veleti, but the Franks quickly became more distracted with affairs in the south and the routine threat of the Norsemen. Invading the deep forests was widely considered unprofitable and pointless - border raiding would continue but it would never escalate far beyond that.

The Wendish religion, however, was under threat regardless. Christian missionaries gained some converts, especially among border communities pragmatically hoping that conversion would spare them future Frankish raids. And yet the greatest threat was not these missionaries or pragmatism but simply the slow divorce between the ritualistic, formal political religion developing among the tribal elite and the folk religion of the common people. Over the decades since the founding of Veletia as a confederal kingdom, the people began to feel increasingly disconnected from the major shrines, which became political power-brokers, and drawn more towards localized folk observances. Individual communities became more and more distinct from any broad identity as "Wends" or even their larger tribal affiliations.

While their neighbors were bound together, the Wends slowly drifted apart.

India - the revolution continues

If the Guild Era began in the north, along the rich lands of the Ganges, it was the south which harnessed its full potential. Generally speaking, south India was less densely populated and less inherently productive than the wealthy Indo-Gangetic plain. Accordingly, it had more room to grow and develop as it moved from tenant farming and the pseudo-feudal land structures of the late Imperial era into the guild organized systems that followed. By giving the local populations a direct stake in the development of the land and the communal resources to properly develop it, production increased significantly. The vast expansion of agricultural production freed up more land for cash crops such as spices and cotton the latter of which fuelled a large-scale urban textile industry.

With these innovations, the power of urban manufactory guilds increased rapidly. The remaining monarchies of the region found themselves increasingly under the sway of these guilds, and attempts by the Rajas to assert their independence from their ostensible subjects often resulted in the establishment of further guild republics.

In the waning era of the Maukhani Empire, the Yuvaraja dynasty ofVinukonda was able to assert their independence, but the times were simply unsuited to the sort of imperial pretensions the Yuvaraja dynasty offered. Under the latter Andhran Maharaja Vikramaditya (778-801) the Andhran monarchy attempted to conquer the republican city-states of Trikalinga only to exhaust themselves utterly and become deeply indebted to the very trading guilds who they had attempted to rule. After Vikramaditya's death, Andhra's rapid transition into a Ganarajya-style republic was almost inevitable.

Vikramaditya's replacement was an orator and poet by the name of Hasti, a member of the brahmin administrative class whose persistence in Andhra allowed the "Andhran revolution" as later ideologues would describe it to effectively be little more than a palace coup with few immediate social changes. The social and economic revolution of later decades should not be falsely assumed to have begun with Hasti's ascension, even if he did quickly develop a reputation as a reformer. After Hasti died in 817, he was replaced with Jayasimha, the son of Visnuvarma, a warrior-guild general, a choice undoubtedly inspired by renewed warfare with Trikalinga.

On the Deccan plateau, the rise of urban polities was far more limited. Instead a new sort of empire emerged, one founded by a group of exiled Gurjar tribesmen. Called the Chandratreya Empire after its founding dynasty, it was centered around the old city of Pratisthana. Despite the relatively poor soil of the Deccan, it was exceptionally mineral rich, and the local guilds accordingly became exceptionally wealthy off of mining and the associated artisanal industries. Unlike on the Ganges, military guilds here did not form autonomously but rather were local militias, and accordingly the state did not fall into the trap of relying on these guilds but rather preserved its own professional mercenary armies without guild allegiance.

The Chandratreya Empire, as with all post-imperial polities, had its powers limited by the republican institutions of the guilds. In many senses, later historians have often considered it more of a mercantile alliance than an empire at all. In Gujarat, the city of Bharuch, which by 800 was the largest port in the world, was a federate of the Empire - and yet also considered a part of the Ganarajya of Surastra, and simultaneously a potent city-state in its own right. To the southwest, the Kuntala dynasty ruled as nominal vassals and allies of the Chandratreya, and yet often made policy decisions independently of their supposed overlords in Pratisthana.

When the Aghatsaghids were driven from the subcontinent, no region suffered more than Sindh. Local violence against the Turko-Iranian landlord class was brutal and uncompromising, and left a power vacuum with none to fill it. Unlike the generally pluralistic Indian religious world, Sindh was and firmly Buddhist - but the Buddhist clergy, despite their instrumental role in organizing the rebellion, rapidly lost control of it as they condemned the excesses and violence.

Sindh accordingly did not remain independent for long. Akadadeva Dauwa, one of the many Gurjar warlords living in the marginal territory of the Thar led, according to legend, some seventy men to Mulasthanapura (Multan) and seized the city by stealth, allowing his nearby tribe to capture the surrounding land and turn overnight from herders to conquerors. From there his conquests snowballed down the Indus. By 830, the Dauwa ruled all of Sindh. Their legacy was as patrons of international trade, expanding the river-ports that linked the Indus valley to the wider world. Infrastructure development, long neglected by the Aghatsaghids was a priority of the Dauwa, who sought to, through enormous public works, win the loyalty of their subjects and prove that they were more than another foreign occupier.

The religious geography of the subcontinent was largely inherited from the nondualistic and monistic scholars patronized by the Maukhani. This universalist Hinduism remained a common trend in the new and pluralistic post-Imperial India. The idea of all gods and souls as aspects of a singular, impersonal divine truth (Brahman) allowed the priestly classes to compete with Buddhism. By linking their complex theologies to the devotional cultic movements, the Hindu priestly classes appealed to the common man and the intellectual classes alike. However Buddhism was a force to be reckoned with. Many powerful guilds patronized Buddhist monasteries and for those at the bottom of the social spectrum, the egalitarian aspects of Buddhism had far more appeal.

It is difficult to speak broadly of the Indian religions. The sheer multiplicity of belief systems and schools of thought only became more complex and interlinked throughout this era, as travel and trade allowed the communication of ideas. Even without touching on Hindu-inspired religions such as Bhakti which had their origins on the subcontinent but became popular mostly in Africa, the web of competing and complimentary philosophies is difficult to unravel.

Despite the regionalization of politics, the relative interconnection of the subcontinent ensured that regional trends in religion still had a global audience. Competing guilds still maintained their local cults, but these local cults were understood to be part of a broader framework. By the end of the eighth century and the dawn of the post-imperial era many new religious texts had been compiled. Called the Dharmasukta, they built on the accumulated mysticism of the Upanishads and the rituals of Brahamanic Hinduism to create the groundwork of what would eventually be considered "modern" Hinduism. The deification of the Buddha as an aspect of Vishnu was but one part of this new synthesis.

[I confess to not being an expert on the Dharmic religions, but this post was long overdue. Essentially what happened was that the Bhakti movements didn't catch on and Puranas were never written because of the very different past couple centuries and the Maukhani trying to make a universal umbrella version of Hinduism underwritten by a monist ideology. These ideas stuck and were eventually compiled into texts called the Dharmasukta.

By the post Imperial era, regionalism in religion becomes more commonplace, but it's largely done within the framework of the Dharmasukta rather than the Puranas. Competing with Buddhism rather than Islam means that there's no future for personal devotional religion, and so the Bhakti movement is largely a bunch of exiles who eventually move to East Africa, where it turns out to be a lot more appealing.

Theoretically you could also consider the Mahadevists an early Bhakti offshoot, but nobody does because they're basically Indianized Zoroastrians and by 800 they don't exist anymore as a meaningful movement.]


sXiMFxW.png
 
Another awesome update!
All brands of faith get a shot with the Western Slavs, neat, we`ll see how that develops, so far both plausible and interesting.
Yet more wonderful developments in India. What exactly might these quick progresses in agriculture in Southern India that you speak about and which free up land for cash crops like cotton and spices be?
 
I'm satisfied with the inclusion of the Polish, I just have two questions.

  1. Why did you use the twrm of "Poland" in the last post instead of "Polonia", the name you had on the last map?
  2. Do the Polish only have the territory labeled "Polonia" on the last map, or had Czcibor conquered the Masovians and Pomeranians too? You did mention him having conquered a sizable empire, after all.
 
Thanks guys!

@Salvador

The largest "progress" has been the transition to corporate guild owned farming pushing out indigenous tribal peoples whose land use wasn't perhaps as efficient as theirs. This took both military and non-military forms, but generally involved coercive economic force in any case. This process occurred in OTL between say 600-800, but the feudal landholders who replaced the tribes in our timeline weren't really much more productive. Here everything is better organized because the guilds are more profit-focused than the landholder, and there's more individual incentive for the farmers to work since they can more directly see benefits from their labor.

Some small innovations in terms of irrigation and pumps have also been designed, transforming marginal arid territory in some places, particularly the south. Most of the progress has been social however, since technologically India is pretty well set and also already has many large harvests.

@Honest Abe:

1. I used the English name for the country where the Poles live.

2. The current map is not yet up to date with all things. Many local peoples have been incorporated into the greater Polonia/Poland. Including the Pomeranians and Masovians. Whether those groups will assimilate or maintain their own identity is yet up in the air. Stay tuned!
 
Top