Alternate warships of nations

1633331381132.png


I do love the chunky superstructures of the Takao class. Fine ships, both in looks and in combat.
 
View attachment 684799

I do love the chunky superstructures of the Takao class. Fine ships, both in looks and in combat.
Good looking does not always equals functionality, as the heavy large superstructure was a major cause of top heaviness on these ships, causing it not to be repeated in the next classes of cruisers (Mogami class and follow on), being replaced by smaller less tall structures. Besides that, the large superstructure makes it ideal to catch enemy fire, causing all sorts of problems in combat.
 

perfectgeneral

Donor
Monthly Donor
View attachment 684667
HMS Tiger WW1 looks right from any angle.
I wonder how useful a more heavily armoured Renown class (instead of all the Revenges) like an up-gunned Tiger might be? Tiger herself had three inches of belt on Renown (only thinning to much less before the magazines so...) and half an inch more deck armour. Say 10in belt, 3.5in deck with 5in over magazines after Jutland. How much slower? Lower in the water? Displacement? I assume an aft super-firing turret is precluded.

The Revenges/Renowns (the Re-class) Have 42 bulky boilers as they are a wartime rush job. If they are much slower with all that extra armour putting them lower in the water then a machinery refit after the war is strongly recommended. They have the length to make it worthwhile. One or two incomplete hulls might be adapted as beltless aircraft carriers, setting a refit/finish standard for the overly light Courageous Class. The logical progression to reuse the twins of decommissioning QE-class for further heavy battlecruisers and replacing the battleships with more 3x3 fast battleships as the military and political climate merits.

Re-class 760ft pp (804ft oal) , 10in belt sloped out 23° , 3.5-5in deck , aiming for 30-31 knots (draft?)
3x3 fast battleships 700ft pp (745ft oal), 13in belt sloped out 17° , 4-6in deck , aiming for 27-28 knots (KGV)
Beams 90ft (1931 onwards bulged out to 102ft by two extra torpedo bulkheads each side. Inner 3ft wide spaces plumbed for fuel oil, outer sluiced for counter flooding)
1930s Engine/boiler room refit for Small tube boilers from 112,000shp to 140,000shp, deck armour replaced with 1in thicker over vital areas.
Secondary gun refits (1933 onwards): 10x to 12x 4.7"/40 (12 cm) Mark X in half inch thick turrets elevating to 70°. Approx weight 15ton single, 27ton twin. Electric train and elevation initially 15° per second later boosted to 20° with a rear mounted back-up generator set.
Casemates for 6in secondary and torpedo tubes removed. Citadel removed. Increased crew accommodation space post-Invergordon.
 
Last edited:
Are you not getting very close to HMS Hood?
I have always been partial to swapping Tiger for Iron Duke as the RN gunnery training ship in the LNT and then doing a British 'Kongo' to her.
Also give her the 14" as for KGV. Very useful for killing PB's and fairly good for taking on at least one of the twins.
If done by 1938, could deputise for Hood whist she was rebuilt in 1938/40
 
Are you not getting very close to HMS Hood?
I have always been partial to swapping Tiger for Iron Duke as the RN gunnery training ship in the LNT and then doing a British 'Kongo' to her.
Also give her the 14" as for KGV. Very useful for killing PB's and fairly good for taking on at least one of the twins.
If done by 1938, could deputise for Hood whist she was rebuilt in 1938/40
Changing the 13.5" guns for a new design 14" twin turret wouldn't be worth the high cost. The 13.5" was fine for anything you really needed to shot.
 
Good fire power, weak armor. They could be chewed up by USN CL's. Even 5" shells could do serious damage.
To be fair thats a criticism that can be leveled at virtually all treaty era cruisers. Where the Japanese made mistakes is that their cruisers were almost universally over the treaty limits by at least 10% and yet their ships still had paper armor and lousy subdivision. If you are going to cheat and lie about the size of your ships you should be able to get a better end product, not a slightly overweight but generally comparable cruiser to everyone else.
 

perfectgeneral

Donor
Monthly Donor
Are you not getting very close to HMS Hood?
We are 100ft or so shy of that length. More like 160ft shorter for the 3x3 turret KGV-class that has an inch thicker 13in belt (albeit tightened somewhat). A less escalatory design. (added to my software's dictionary)
Renown class altered, Britain Fast Battleship laid down 1916 (Engine 1927)

Displacement:
32,759 t light; 34,487 t standard; 38,000 t normal; 40,810 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(803.91 ft / 760.00 ft) x 90.00 ft (Bulges 102.00 ft) x (30.51 / 32.47 ft)
(245.03 m / 231.65 m) x 27.43 m (Bulges 31.09 m) x (9.30 / 9.90 m)

Armament:
6 - 15.00" / 381 mm 45.0 cal guns - 1,701.89lbs / 771.96kg shells, 120 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1916 Model
3 x Single mounts on centreline ends, majority forward
1 raised mount - superfiring
20 - 4.72" / 120 mm 40.0 cal guns - 50.53lbs / 22.92kg shells, 500 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1933 Model
10 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
12 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm 60.0 cal guns - 2.14lbs / 0.97kg shells, 500 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1933 Model
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 raised mounts
16 - 0.79" / 20.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 0.25lbs / 0.11kg shells, 150 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck mounts, 1933 Model
2 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 double raised mounts
Weight of broadside 11,252 lbs / 5,104 kg

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 560.00 ft / 170.69 m 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
Ends: 1.75" / 44 mm 200.00 ft / 60.96 m 9.51 ft / 2.90 m
Upper: 1.75" / 44 mm 560.00 ft / 170.69 m 7.22 ft / 2.20 m
Main Belt covers 113 % of normal length
Main Belt inclined 23.00 degrees (positive = in)

- Torpedo Bulkhead - Additional damage containing bulkheads:
1.75" / 44 mm 567.00 ft / 172.82 m 30.05 ft / 9.16 m
Beam between torpedo bulkheads 70.00 ft / 21.34 m

- Hull Bulges:
0.25" / 6 mm 567.00 ft / 172.82 m 24.00 ft / 7.32 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14.2" / 360 mm 7.09" / 180 mm 13.4" / 340 mm
2nd: 3.94" / 100 mm 1.30" / 33 mm 3.15" / 80 mm
3rd: 0.79" / 20 mm 0.39" / 10 mm 0.79" / 20 mm

- Armoured deck - multiple decks:
For and Aft decks: 5.00" / 127 mm

- Conning towers: Forward 2.00" / 51 mm, Aft 2.00" / 51 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 145,001 shp / 108,171 Kw = 31.21 kts
Range 6,654nm at 19.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 6,323 tons

Complement:
1,360 - 1,769

Cost:
£4.631 million / $18.523 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,361 tons, 6.2 %
- Guns: 2,361 tons, 6.2 %
Armour: 12,197 tons, 32.1 %
- Belts: 4,197 tons, 11.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,103 tons, 2.9 %
- Bulges: 126 tons, 0.3 %
- Armament: 2,665 tons, 7.0 %
- Armour Deck: 4,008 tons, 10.5 %
- Conning Towers: 97 tons, 0.3 %
Machinery: 4,577 tons, 12.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 13,541 tons, 35.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,241 tons, 13.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 83 tons, 0.2 %
- Hull below water: 83 tons

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
53,663 lbs / 24,341 Kg = 31.8 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 9.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.09
Metacentric height 5.1 ft / 1.5 m
Roll period: 19.0 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.46
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.00

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
a normal bow and large transom stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.562 / 0.568
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.45 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 31.99 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 70
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 39.50 degrees
Stern overhang: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 16.00 %, 29.00 ft / 8.84 m, 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Forward deck: 34.00 %, 22.00 ft / 6.71 m, 19.00 ft / 5.79 m
- Aft deck: 37.00 %, 19.00 ft / 5.79 m, 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Quarter deck: 13.00 %, 22.00 ft / 6.71 m, 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Average freeboard: 21.51 ft / 6.56 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 84.5 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 144.4 %
Waterplane Area: 50,288 Square feet or 4,672 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 121 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 198 lbs/sq ft or 966 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.11
- Longitudinal: 1.28
- Overall: 1.12
Adequate machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Excellent accommodation and workspace room
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Renown class altered, Britain Fast Battleship laid down 1916 (Engine 1928)

Displacement:
33,261 t light; 35,000 t standard; 38,512 t normal; 41,321 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(805.13 ft / 760.00 ft) x 90.00 ft (Bulges 102.00 ft) x (30.50 / 32.44 ft)
(245.40 m / 231.65 m) x 27.43 m (Bulges 31.09 m) x (9.30 / 9.89 m)

Armament:
6 - 15.00" / 381 mm 45.0 cal guns - 1,701.89lbs / 771.96kg shells, 120 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1916 Model
3 x Single mounts on centreline ends, majority forward
1 raised mount - superfiring
20 - 4.72" / 120 mm 40.0 cal guns - 50.53lbs / 22.92kg shells, 500 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1924 Model
10 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
12 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm 60.0 cal guns - 2.14lbs / 0.97kg shells, 500 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1916 Model
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 raised mounts
16 - 0.79" / 20.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 0.25lbs / 0.11kg shells, 150 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck mounts, 1916 Model
2 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 double raised mounts
Weight of broadside 11,252 lbs / 5,104 kg

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 500.00 ft / 152.40 m 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
Ends: 1.75" / 44 mm 260.00 ft / 79.25 m 9.51 ft / 2.90 m
Upper: 1.75" / 44 mm 500.00 ft / 152.40 m 7.22 ft / 2.20 m
Main Belt covers 101 % of normal length
Main Belt inclined 23.00 degrees (positive = in)

- Torpedo Bulkhead - Additional damage containing bulkheads:
1.75" / 44 mm 567.00 ft / 172.82 m 30.05 ft / 9.16 m
Beam between torpedo bulkheads 70.00 ft / 21.34 m

- Hull Bulges:
0.50" / 13 mm 567.00 ft / 172.82 m 24.00 ft / 7.32 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14.2" / 360 mm 7.09" / 180 mm 13.4" / 340 mm
2nd: 3.94" / 100 mm 1.30" / 33 mm 3.15" / 80 mm
3rd: 0.79" / 20 mm 0.39" / 10 mm 0.79" / 20 mm

- Armoured deck - multiple decks:
For and Aft decks: 5.00" / 127 mm

- Conning towers: Forward 2.00" / 51 mm, Aft 2.00" / 51 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 145,000 shp / 108,170 Kw = 31.11 kts
Range 6,652nm at 19.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 6,321 tons

Complement:
1,373 - 1,786

Cost:
£4.645 million / $18.581 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,361 tons, 6.1 %
- Guns: 2,361 tons, 6.1 %
Armour: 13,037 tons, 33.9 %
- Belts: 4,564 tons, 11.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,103 tons, 2.9 %
- Bulges: 252 tons, 0.7 %
- Armament: 2,984 tons, 7.7 %
- Armour Deck: 4,036 tons, 10.5 %
- Conning Towers: 98 tons, 0.3 %
Machinery: 4,514 tons, 11.7 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 13,266 tons, 34.4 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,251 tons, 13.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 83 tons, 0.2 %
- Hull below water: 83 tons

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
60,693 lbs / 27,530 Kg = 36.0 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 9.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.13
Metacentric height 5.4 ft / 1.6 m
Roll period: 18.5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.52
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.15

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
a normal bow and large transom stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.570 / 0.575
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.45 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 31.97 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 61
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 39.50 degrees
Stern overhang: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 16.00 %, 30.49 ft / 9.29 m, 26.49 ft / 8.07 m
- Forward deck: 34.00 %, 26.49 ft / 8.07 m, 23.49 ft / 7.16 m
- Aft deck: 37.00 %, 23.49 ft / 7.16 m, 23.49 ft / 7.16 m
- Quarter deck: 13.00 %, 23.49 ft / 7.16 m, 26.49 ft / 8.07 m
- Average freeboard: 24.93 ft / 7.60 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 82.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 170.1 %
Waterplane Area: 50,654 Square feet or 4,706 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 120 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 187 lbs/sq ft or 914 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.01
- Longitudinal: 1.39
- Overall: 1.05
Excellent machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Excellent accommodation and workspace room
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform

"Hood was significantly larger than her predecessors of the Renown class." - wiki opinion
King George V class altered, Britain Fast Battleship laid down 1931

Displacement:
32,887 t light; 35,000 t standard; 37,618 t normal; 39,713 t full load

Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(750.35 ft / 710.00 ft) x 90.00 ft (Bulges 100.00 ft) x (34.00 / 35.59 ft)
(228.71 m / 216.41 m) x 27.43 m (Bulges 30.48 m) x (10.36 / 10.85 m)

Armament:
9 - 15.00" / 381 mm 50.0 cal guns - 1,786.45lbs / 810.32kg shells, 120 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1931 Model
3 x Single mounts on centreline ends, majority forward
1 raised mount - superfiring
20 - 4.72" / 120 mm 40.0 cal guns - 50.53lbs / 22.92kg shells, 500 per gun
Dual purpose guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1931 Model
10 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
12 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm 60.0 cal guns - 2.14lbs / 0.97kg shells, 500 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1931 Model
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 raised mounts
16 - 0.79" / 20.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 0.25lbs / 0.11kg shells, 150 per gun
Anti-air guns in deck mounts, 1931 Model
2 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts
6 x Twin mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 double raised mounts
Weight of broadside 17,118 lbs / 7,765 kg

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 13.0" / 330 mm 440.00 ft / 134.11 m 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
Ends: 1.50" / 38 mm 250.00 ft / 76.20 m 9.51 ft / 2.90 m
20.00 ft / 6.10 m Unarmoured ends
Upper: 1.50" / 38 mm 440.00 ft / 134.11 m 7.22 ft / 2.20 m
Main Belt covers 95 % of normal length
Main Belt inclined 17.00 degrees (positive = in)

- Torpedo Bulkhead - Additional damage containing bulkheads:
1.75" / 44 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 30.05 ft / 9.16 m
Beam between torpedo bulkheads 70.00 ft / 21.34 m

- Hull Bulges:
0.25" / 6 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 26.00 ft / 7.92 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14.0" / 356 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 13.0" / 330 mm
2nd: 4.50" / 114 mm 1.50" / 38 mm 3.00" / 76 mm
3rd: 0.75" / 19 mm 0.75" / 19 mm 0.75" / 19 mm

- Armoured deck - multiple decks:
For and Aft decks: 6.00" / 152 mm

- Conning towers: Forward 2.00" / 51 mm, Aft 2.00" / 51 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 89,999 shp / 67,139 Kw = 27.53 kts
Range 5,099nm at 19.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,713 tons

Complement:
1,349 - 1,755

Cost:
£14.330 million / $57.320 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 3,913 tons, 10.4 %
- Guns: 3,913 tons, 10.4 %
Armour: 13,277 tons, 35.3 %
- Belts: 4,351 tons, 11.6 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 876 tons, 2.3 %
- Bulges: 108 tons, 0.3 %
- Armament: 3,422 tons, 9.1 %
- Armour Deck: 4,424 tons, 11.8 %
- Conning Towers: 97 tons, 0.3 %
Machinery: 2,691 tons, 7.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 12,923 tons, 34.4 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,731 tons, 12.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 83 tons, 0.2 %
- Hull below water: 83 tons

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
49,827 lbs / 22,601 Kg = 29.5 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 8.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.05
Metacentric height 4.7 ft / 1.4 m
Roll period: 19.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.76
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.18

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
an extended bulbous bow and large transom stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.545 / 0.550
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.10 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 31.12 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 59
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 37.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 16.00 %, 27.00 ft / 8.23 m, 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Forward deck: 34.00 %, 23.00 ft / 7.01 m, 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Aft deck: 37.00 %, 20.00 ft / 6.10 m, 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Quarter deck: 13.00 %, 20.00 ft / 6.10 m, 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Average freeboard: 21.44 ft / 6.54 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 86.0 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 135.2 %
Waterplane Area: 46,224 Square feet or 4,294 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 106 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 211 lbs/sq ft or 1,031 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.01
- Longitudinal: 1.58
- Overall: 1.06
Adequate machinery, storage, compartmentation space
Excellent accommodation and workspace room
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Changing the 13.5" guns for a new design 14" twin turret wouldn't be worth the high cost. The 13.5" was fine for anything you really needed to shot.
The new 14" twin turret was designed to fit Iron Duke's 13.5" twin turret rings* for testing purposes, so not as expensive as you'd think. You gain the option of modern targetting and higher elevation.

@sonofpegasus corrects this. Turret slides (gun mount) not turret ring (turret mount).
 
Last edited:
Actually the IIRC the 14" for KGV were designed to fit the slides of the earlier existing 13.5" guns as fitted to HM ships from Orion onwards, so that the existing turrets on the Iron Duke class or any of the Big Cats could have been refitted to take the new 14" gun. Most of the turret internals such as the hoists etc would need to be replace but a lot quicker and cheaper than building new turrets.
Fit Tiger with new geared turbines and three drum Admiralty small tube boilers (saving weight and space) give her bulges for torpedo protection and buoyancy the maintain draft with more armour and without occupying a precious building slipway you have an extra fast Battleship/battle cruiser.
I know it is 20/20 hindsight but given the choice I think IMVHO a rebuilt 'Kongoed' Tiger in 1939 would be more than a fair swap for the 'Gaurdsvan' in 1946.
 

McPherson

Banned
I wonder how useful a more heavily armoured Renown class (instead of all the Revenges) like an up-gunned Tiger might be? Tiger herself had three inches of belt on Renown (only thinning to much less before the magazines so...) and half an inch more deck armour. Say 10in belt, 3.5in deck with 5in over magazines after Jutland. How much slower? Lower in the water? Displacement? I assume an aft super-firing turret is precluded.

The Revenges/Renowns (the Re-class) Have 42 bulky boilers as they are a wartime rush job. If they are much slower with all that extra armour putting them lower in the water then a machinery refit after the war is strongly recommended. They have the length to make it worthwhile. One or two incomplete hulls might be adapted as beltless aircraft carriers, setting a refit/finish standard for the overly light Courageous Class. The logical progression to reuse the twins of decommissioning QE-class for further heavy battlecruisers and replacing the battleships with more 3x3 fast battleships as the military and political climate merits.

Re-class 760ft pp (804ft oal) , 10in belt sloped out 23° , 3.5-5in deck , aiming for 30-31 knots (draft?)
3x3 fast battleships 700ft pp (745ft oal), 13in belt sloped out 17° , 4-6in deck , aiming for 27-28 knots (KGV)
Beams 90ft (1931 onwards bulged out to 102ft by two extra torpedo bulkheads each side. Inner 3ft wide spaces plumbed for fuel oil, outer sluiced for counter flooding)
1930s Engine/boiler room refit for Small tube boilers from 112,000shp to 160,000shp, deck armour replaced with 1in thicker over vital areas.
Secondary gun refits (1933 onwards): 10x to 12x 4.7"/40 (12 cm) Mark X in half inch thick turrets elevating to 70°. Approx weight 15ton single, 27ton twin. Electric train and elevation initially 15° per second later boosted to 20° with a rear mounted back-up generator set.
Casemates for 6in secondary and torpedo tubes removed. Citadel removed. Increased crew accommodation space post-Invergordon.
Look at your drafts. Can these rebuilds and new builds and refits use existent British harbors and berths? There are historical reasons why these did not happen.
 
Look at your drafts. Can these rebuilds and new builds and refits use existent British harbors and berths? There are historical reasons why these did not happen.
All of these builds, rebuilds, and refits were physically possible in British shipyards.
The problem (and it is a significant problem) is squeezing the money for them out of the Treasury.
 

perfectgeneral

Donor
Monthly Donor
All of these builds, rebuilds, and refits were physically possible in British shipyards.
The problem (and it is a significant problem) is squeezing the money for them out of the Treasury.
Yes Renown was pretty small draft compared to battleships. The military ports can usually manage 29-32ft and anchorages to ferry to/from are possible for those that are deeper in the water. Not that changes would be that great.

How much more than a Revenge is a Renown? More a shift in priorities at the time of building. The 1927 to 1933 refits? Money for jobs and to improve within treaty limits. More return on your investment here than on the QEs.
 
Last edited:
Top