Twelve Children of Camelot: Prince Arthur has twelve children with Catherine of Aragon, whom do they marry?

Oh, make no mistake, with Catherine as bullet proof as she is here and her family loathing the Valois there's no way on Earth or in Hell that she'd ever let a single child of her's, under any circumstances, marry into France. She and all of her birth family would rather stick needles in their eyes than marry French...
…her dad literally married a French princess. Charles V was betrothed to one for many years, and later married his sister to the French king.
 
Oh, make no mistake, with Catherine as bullet proof as she is here and her family loathing the Valois there's no way on Earth or in Hell that she'd ever let a single child of her's, under any circumstances, marry into France. She and all of her birth family would rather stick needles in their eyes than marry French...
Seconding @HortenseMancini

Additionally, Henry VII is likely to live quite a long time and so is probably the one arranging the marriages
 
No way as younger sons did not get prestigious royal princesses as brides....the only way Beja works is if one of the princesses becomes queen regnant
Eh, sometimes younger sons did, rare but it did happen. And with England having soo many princesses to marry off, a wealthy Portuguese prince with his own title is not a bad match.

Royal princes were entitled to dukedoms regardless of age and a fledgling dynasty like the Tudors cannot risk sending legitimate sons to church (see the sons of Edward III/Philippa of Hainault - all were dukes and none were sent to church). Male bastards can be considered for church life though
Royal princes are not entitled to dukedoms. Princes did enter the church (see Henry Cardinal King of Portugal) and with 6 sons plus Henry’s branch of Tudors the Tudors can afford to send a son to the church, especially since by the time the youngest reach adulthood they probably have a nephew or two.
 
Royal princes are not entitled to dukedoms. Princes did enter the church (see Henry Cardinal King of Portugal) and with 6 sons plus Henry’s branch of Tudors the Tudors can afford to send a son to the church, especially since by the time the youngest reach adulthood they probably have a nephew or two.
The key though is that the cardinal king was not English, he was portuguese. English kings and royal dukes did not send their legitimate sons to the church. It didn’t even happen with Edward iii or richard of York, who had plenty of legitimate sons.
 
Eh, sometimes younger sons did, rare but it did happen. And with England having soo many princesses to marry off, a wealthy Portuguese prince with his own title is not a bad match.
I’m sorry, I just can’t see Henry settling for a second son - a more minor continental ruler, like Duke of Lorraine or Duke of Cleves, would do just as well while still being a sovereign
 
The key though is that the cardinal king was not English, he was portuguese. English kings and royal dukes did not send their legitimate sons to the church. It didn’t even happen with Edward iii or richard of York, who had plenty of legitimate sons.
Point, though perhaps, that's one of the Iberian traditions Catherine brings with her.
 
I’m sorry, I just can’t see Henry settling for a second son - a more minor continental ruler, like Duke of Lorraine or Duke of Cleves, would do just as well while still being a sovereign
See the problem is both the Duke of Lorraine and the Duke of Cleves were slightly to young for those three princesses (Katharine, Margaret, Cecily). Having those three so close in age, makes it hard to find them all a match.
 
Last edited:
Eh, sometimes younger sons did, rare but it did happen. And with England having soo many princesses to marry off, a wealthy Portuguese prince with his own title is not a bad match.
Yes but that's a waste of dowry. Why not save money and shove them to nunneries at that point
 
…her dad literally married a French princess. Charles V was betrothed to one for many years, and later married his sister to the French king.
There are rare exceptions, but Catherine was well known to loathe the French, so her babies won't be marrying them with the influence she has here...
 
All depends on the influence she has - she's had twelve children by Arthur after all; that gives her some clout at court.
Yes - but surely even she can see the international clout that could come from her daughters being queens of basically half of Europe. Maybe if one of the younger boys is gender-flipped, then Sigismund II Augustus gets a Tudor wife
 
Yes - but surely even she can see the international clout that could come from her daughters being queens of basically half of Europe. Maybe if one of the younger boys is gender-flipped, then Sigismund II Augustus gets a Tudor wife
If it's any, it's the youngest, so the French descendants are so far removed from the throne that they won't be a threat.
 
Yes - but surely even she can see the international clout that could come from her daughters being queens of basically half of Europe. Maybe if one of the younger boys is gender-flipped, then Sigismund II Augustus gets a Tudor wife
So many likely matches for the girls!

Elizabeth b 1503 m Charles V
Mary b 1506 to John III of Portugal?
Katherine b 1509 became a nun due to poor health
Margaret b 1509 m James V of Scotland b 1512
Cecily b 1510 m Gustav I Vasa
Joan b 1515 m Francis II of France b 1518
 
Even if Arthur maintained the same level of fiscal discipline that his father had, the crown will end his reign rather impoverished trying to support six sons living into adulthood as well as dowries for six daughters. (Unless the English still held to the tradition that a dowry was only paid for the eldest daughter. I'm not sure when they ditched this, though I'm pretty sure it was before this time.)


Alfred in many ways a lot like King Arthur, only victorious and definitely real
Except Arthur is not "definitely real" 🙃

Would not be Duke of Lancaster
I have quibbles about the titles too x'D

at least one would be sent to the church
I don't know. As much as this was a thing on the continent, English monarchs didn't really have a tradition of sending their legitimate sons into the church. None had since the Conquest and I can't think of even an Anglo-Saxon king who did off the top of my head.
 
Even if Arthur maintained the same level of fiscal discipline that his father had, the crown will end his reign rather impoverished trying to support six sons living into adulthood as well as dowries for six daughters.
Not particularly. He can always start some conquests, maybe use the loot as returned dowries (e.g. Isabella of Aragon's dowry)
 
Top