I was thinking about picking up that book a while back, but I remember reading a review that it gives an overly romanticized view of Cixi so I ended up passing. Is it actually pretty balanced?
Eh, its good on some things, shitty on the other, its a book thats really dependent on reading it the right way (In the notes). I think a lot of the shit it gets comes from the fact that it goes against the conventional version of her that we've seen since the beginning in the west. There's admittedly some problems with the some of the sources but its not full on apologetics. I have better sources but they're also out of print sources so I was trying to go with the easier stuff.
Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism: The T'ung-Chih Restoration, 1862-1874 is admittedly better.
Also, I embarrassingly didn't know Chinese dynasties didn't just go by their last names so I was surprised when I saw Yun Dynasty instead of Zeng Dynasty. Goes to show I don't know anything. But that's what I really like about this timeline, I'm suddenly reading a lot more about an era and location that I don't much about at all. It's really awesome. Keep it up! I'd love to see more about what the Yun Dynasty will be like.
Well thank you, thats the intent I've been going for. On another website Hendryk has noted that my dialog in a lot of instances doesn't work to well with Chinese, but I'll admit I'm not a speaker, and I'm going for a story with interesting historical facts. I'd never say I'm the best for Chinese History, but I do try to do as much research as I can and promote some interest. Haggisian Crusade and all that.
One final question, would the war really be more or less over in one year as you have it here? Seems a bit quick to take the heavily fortified capital and be recognized as the legitimate government. Surely the Qing weren't in that catastrophic of a state considering they kept limping on for almost fifty more years after this.
As I understand it (and I admit I don't know much, so anyone who knows better please correct me), a large factor in Qing China's continued existence was the various Western Powers propping up the state so no one would get full control of China. Without that, I could see Qing China going under quickly to a reasonably modernized force.
Would these foreign powers not have helped out the Qing if Zeng had rebelled?
Depends on whether they think their interests would be guaranteed.Besides that,there are limits to the strength of the foreign powers. In their end,they did not lift a finger to help the Qing in 1911.
On the issue of the Qing falling and Foreign Intervention.
First things first, the domestic situation. In 1861-1865 the Qing dynasty was weaker than they had ever been, ever. Yes massive armies were in the field but with a few exceptions practically all the leadership fighting several rebellions at once owed their loyalty too or were on better terms with Zeng Guofan down in the Yangtze Valley than they were with Beijing. The officers that were predominantly loyal to the regime, mostly Manchurian and Mongolian officers were the same guys who got their rears handed to them trying to hold of the British and French in 1860, and as such were pretty much in disgrace.
As such, when push comes to shove in this alternate 1864, Zeng is someone who can (1) Win over the other Generals, both in the war against the Taiping and against the other rebellions against the Qing and (2) Win the support of at least
some of the rebel movements and (3) Maintain the devout support of the Hunan Army, the best equipped, best led, and most effective army on the East Asian Mainland in 1864/5. He even has the support of some of the best Mongol and "Tartar" officers serving in the Chinese Army won by years of mutual service.
To counter this the Qing dynasty can lean on its non-Chinese, Manchurian parallel forces. Just like every Civil Service post in China which had a duplicate Chinese and a duplicate Manchurian holding the post as part of a program to maintain Manchurian separatism as at tool to maintain the "Foreign" Monarchy, there are Manchurian armies, in the North that aren't going to be won over. The problem being that they've more or less been purged since the burning of the Summer Palace and are ill armed. They are also too small to go on much of an offensive, thats why the Qing had allowed regional armies to be organized to fight rebellions in the first place.
This force can't hold anywhere too far south of Bejing, and ITTL were quickly enveloped and pushed back by a sheer wave of force. After that? A desparate retreat into the "Homeland", bad leadership, outclassed troops and outclassed tech (The Hunan Army can field a whole lot of muskets/rifles that the Manchurians cant) and everything gets shoved back.
This isn't to say though, that peace is at hand in China in the immediate term, it just means that meaningful Qing resistance has been wiped from the table. Ethnic rebellions aren't going to be put down at once, but that doesn't mean a new Dynasty can't start.
Now in regards to foreign intervention, yes in the aftermath of 1860 while the British and French public clamored for annexations, the governments in Paris and London decided that concessions and the survival of the Qing were in their favor. Thats why the British created the "Vampire Fleet" and started to bankroll and eventually lead the "Ever-Victorious Army". By 1864 though this has collapsed. The Vampire Fleet which was supposed to be a multi-regional force under British Naval Officer Sherad Osborn. The problem being that he thought he was going to serve directly under the Emperor and Zeng Guofan had other ideas, rather than serve a Hunanese Governor, Osborn quit and the fleet fell apart.
In regards to the other force, that not-really-effective force of Europeans that racism made into supermen under "Chinese" Gordon would see the European-Qing cooperation end just at the start of 1864. Gordon helped oversee the surrender of the city of Suzhou with a promise that the officers and Kings of the Taiping that were commanding in the city would be spared execution. (No such promises were offered to the rest of their command) And when the deed was done, and the Hunanese forces were executing prisoners in mass, Gordon found out that the Kings were being killed too, and resigned his commission at the horror. Support for the Qing in Europe hit zero as soon as the news came around, and the "EVA" was disbanded as a force.
In 1864-1865 the British Policy was a Pox on both houses. Their only concerns were the immediate security of Shanghai, Hong Kong and the other treaty ports. Zeng and his clique would be smart enough not to go for those ports. So long as they do that, there's no reason for the British or French to lift a finger for the Qing. They're not going to like the new dynasty any better, but they're not going to strangle it in the cradle.
And now I'll go back to update writing.