Thought I might as well say that this is a very, very good TL.
Thanks a lot Trixtor, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers!
Thought I might as well say that this is a very, very good TL.
On a related note: is there still a Zionist movement of some sort? (By "Zionist" I mean a group that wishes to establish a Jewish state, not necessarily in the Middle East.)
I don't really have any response to the recent update, aside from wariness over what looks to be quite a bit of ethnic tension in Russia, but I do have some questions:
How is anti-semitism in Europe? OTL, the Nazis made anti-semites look absolutely horrible, but TTL, there hasn't been a major event to change European thought on the matter.
On a related note: is there still a Zionist movement of some sort? (By "Zionist" I mean a group that wishes to establish a Jewish state, not necessarily in the Middle East.)
On a tangentially connected topic: Has the notion of eugenics deflated yet, or are there still major proponents of it? (I assume that the creation of the notion of eugenics is inevitable given any human knowledge of the theory of evolution, due mostly to the way people think in general.)
How about Social Darwinism?
How are the sciences doing? Forgive me if you've given an overview of them, but how are things like computing and atomic physics doing in this timeline?
Great update mate. Any idea on what football would be like in this TL?
Association football is a good deal more popular in America ITTL. Beyond that I am open to suggestions.
I noted that, earlier in the thread, you listed the primary sports of the USA as football (association), rugby, handball and baseball. I think that rugby in TTL's America should be closer to OTL's football, only without so much padding and modifications to the player spread on the field (maybe a mix of OTL's Australian football, Canadian football and rugby league?), and just call it "American rugby". That way, football can be used to refer to that thing people like to kick and stomp around endlessly as in the rest of the world. And I really have nothing much to offer regarding baseball (you seem to be on top of it, besides that sport holds no appeal to me) and handball (IDK if it's anything like basketball, or the other OTL handball).
Good points, I agree about the TTL's Rugby.
As a fan of both American football and rugby (League rather than Union, anyway), will this version of rugby end up as a professional sport, or as just a collegiate one? Because I can start working on team names if you'd like.
Also, what's the deal with playing handball?
A few American Rugby team name suggestions, then;
-New York Titans (this actually was OTL before the name was changed to the Jets at the start of the NFL's existence)
-Los Angeles Stallions
-Chicago Lakers (as in "Great Lake"-ers)
-Baltimore Colts
-Houston Drillers
-San Francisco Locos
-Detroit Mohawks
-Pittsburgh Ironmen
-Dallas Rustlers
-St. Louis Bucks (cooler sounding than "buckaroos")
-Atlanta Rattlesnakes
-Philadelphia Smiths
-Washington Sentinels (reference to one of my favorite so-bad-it's-good movies )
-Miami Barracudas
-Las Vegas Scorpions
-Hampton Buccaneers
-Milwaukee Brewers
-New Orleans Gators
-Cleveland Chargers
-Boston Minutemen
These sound good to me and thanks for remembering the Atlanta Rattlesnakes! The only exception is that Las Vegas doesn't really exist ITTL. How about the Halleckville Scorpions for the capital of Arizona? Also which Hampton are you referring to? How should Rugby be organized; conferences, divisions, etc.?
-No problem, it should be clear that I did do a little research . I forgot, however, that Las Vegas didn't exist ITTL due to the fact that it's basically part of Arizona now, so Halleckville sounds good to me.
-Hampton, VA. I know I shouldn't be stumping for my home state so much, but it just rubs me the wrong way that, in terms of GDP, population size, geography, franchise growth, etc. Virginia has all the right attributes to have at least one Major League sports franchise...and yet, we don't IOTL (and no, the Redskins are NOT my state's team ). I'm flexible on the actual city (I picked Hampton since, as a port town, it has the infrastructure to move teams and fans around easily, and IOTL the VA-Beach area has had some success in infrastructure expansion. Plus, it's that much farther away from both the Capital and Baltimore), but I beseech you give it some thought .
-I think there should be five conferences; Northeast, Midwest, South, Western, and Oceanic, each having an East and West division. I cribbed this somewhat from the TL-191/After the End thread, with the addition of an Oceanic conference for states like Cuba, Polynesia, etc. that doesn't slot well into any of the mainland conferences (although I doubt rugby would be as popular there as football or baseball), with their conference using the East/West division setup to distinguish which ocean they neighbor. I'm not sure if you wanted there to be a Major/Minor League distinction, but I was thinking of using the college teams as the "minor leagues" (with the capacity for accepting walk-ons, of course) in keeping with "mainstream" rugby tradition as originally a collegiate activity.
EDIT: Now that I think about it, the "Oceanic" conference may not work due to a lack of interest and/or franchise prerequisites. If that is so, then perhaps states like Polynesia, Hawaii, etc. can be rolled into the Pacific conference, while Cuba, Martinique, etc. can be put into either the Northeast or South conference (if one state can't meet the franchise requirements in terms of cash flow, fanbase, etc. then perhaps having a pan-state team like OTL's Patriots could work).