Part 1: Of Bandits and Princes
  • ------------------
    Part 1: Of Bandits and Princes


    If history can, with much effort made by those who study it, be considered a series of smaller, usually predictable (and often romantic) narratives intertwined with one another - all protagonized by kingdoms and empires which formed, grew and fell apart, some suddenly and others in a matter of decades or even centuries - then the Ottoman Empire's condition by the end of the 18th century seemed to be nothing short of the final act of a long tragedy. For more than 200 years (from at least the 1400s until the Treaty of Karlowitz in 1699), the empire led by Osman's descendants was a force whose military might was feared by all of Europe, and even after its expulsion from Hungary it was still to repel further Austrian attacks in the Balkans and even retake some lost territory. But years upon years of corruption, incompetent or outright insane sultans, and the failure to modernize its military and administrative apparatus all took their toll on the Sublime Porte, whose weaknesses were revealed in a most humiliating manner in the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774. The loss of the Crimean Khanate in this conflict, and Constantinople's failure to recover it in a subsequent war that only led to the loss of even more land, made it clear to the empire's ruling class that something had to be done before it was too late.

    Of course, implementing the necessary reforms turned out to be a challenge in of itself. The authority of Selim III, the sultan at that critical time, barely mattered beyond the suburbs of Constantinople, and it could be argued that he barely had control over what went on inside the walls of the Topkapi Palace. Rumelia, once a core territory of the empire, was awash with bandits thanks to the socioeconomic disruption caused by the last wars, making an already fragile treasury even weaker. The biggest issue to deal with, however, was the immense power held by the Janissaries, who had long since ceased to be an elite military force and were now nothing more than corrupt kingmakers, and the ayans, autonomous lords who took over local administrations and not only hoarded to themselves the taxes they were supposed to send to the central government, but set up dynasties. Two of the most extreme examples of this decentralization were Ali Pasha of Yanina and Osman Pazvantoglu of Vidin, whose power was so great they consorted with foreign ambassadors.
    440px-Ali_Pasha_Tepelenli_of_Ioannina_Drawn_from_nature_on_14_March_at_Butrint_Lake%2C_by_Louis_Dupr%C3%A9_-_1827.jpg
    434px-Osman_Pazvanto%C4%9Flu.jpg

    Ali Pasha and Osman Pazvantoglu, respectively.

    One character whose biography provides a very revealing insight into Ottoman affairs during the 1790s is Kara Feyzi, a soldier turned bandit whose area of influence covered much of Thrace and the Balkan Mountains (1). Far from a mere criminal, he established an complex organization made up of Muslims and Christians alike, who had no qualms about stealing from their religious brethren. At the same time, however, said organization also served as an intermediary of sorts between the villages and towns in which they had a presence (and were almost always under the control of an ayan) and the Sublime Porte, a relationship that would, in other circumstances, have been nothing more than yet another example of the Ottoman authorities' tendency to coopt bandits whenever possible, both to preserve order and to redirect their destructive activities against foreign enemies. This wasn't the case with Kara Feyzi's network, which took advantage of the state's weakness to grow to an unprecedented size and plunder much of Rumelia as a result.

    But at the same time the rise and growth of this shadowy empire was a sympton of the rot within the Ottoman government, its ultimate fate was an omen of the change that was to come. On June 28 1797, Kara Feyzi launched an attack against the retinue of a local notable named Osman Usta near the town of Çirmen, in Thrace. The undertaking was not only a failure, but decapitated the organization in a single stroke: the notorious bandit was slain along with more than thirty men, many of whom were some of his most trusted lieutenants (2). Subsequent reports showed that while banditry remained a persistent phenomenon in the Rumelian countryside (it always was, for the whole empire), it took on a less cohesive character for the next few years, providing the sultan and his allies with an invaluable window of time to reassert their authority.

    A new order was rising.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) So I found out about this guy while reading a book called Economies of Violence, which describes him as a "warrior-entrepreneur".
    Here's a sci-hub link.

    (2) Kara Feyzi survived IOTL, and his network continued to prosper into the early 1800s as the Porte realized it had no chance of destroying it for good. With him dead Selim III has one less thorn on his side, for the moment.
     
    Part 2: The First Steps
  • ------------------
    Part 2: The First Steps


    The package of reforms spearheaded by Selim III, known as a whole by the name of the Nizam-i Cedid ("New Order"), was only the latest in a long series of unsuccessful attempts by multiple sultans and grand viziers to clean up the rot that had begun to set in the Ottoman military and bureaucracy since at least the early 17th century. The first and by far the most famous of these failures was Osman II's plan to replace the Janissaries with an army of Anatolian sekbans (salaried irregular troops who had a propensity to engage in brigandage whenever unemployed), which led to his regicide by their hands at the age of 17. Other attempts were made a few decades before Selim's accession, with the hiring of French military officers such as Claude Alexandre de Bonneval and François Baron de Tott, but these initiatives withered due to the complacency brought about by events such as the reconquest of Belgrade from the Austrians in 1739.

    Naturally, the losses suffered during the Russo-Turkish wars of 1768-74 and 1787-92 destroyed said complacency quite thoroughly. It was, in fact, during the end stages of the latter conflict that the first foundations of the Nizam-i Cedid were laid, with grand vizier Koca Yusuf Pasha assembling a small unit made up of Russian prisoners and members of his personal guard, which was then trained in the use of modern weapons and tactics. The initiative had to be kept at a very small scale during its early stages, lest the grand vizier - and eventually the sultan, who was positively impressed after learning of it - risk incurring the wrath of the Janissaries, and so the new troops were stationed outside of Constantinople until they were strong enough to defend themselves. Foreign officers were hired to serve as instructors and advisors over the next few years, with a certain Napoleon Bonaparte almost joining in before his crackdown of the 13 Vendémiaire royalist coup attempt made him a national hero in France (1).

    429px-Le_grand_vizir_Youssouf_Pacha_en_1788.jpg

    Koca Yusuf Pasha, one of the New Order's many fathers.
    But the new army needed new revenues to sustain its development, and with the Janissaries still too powerful to be challenged openly, the cash-strapped Sublime Porte had no choice other than to create a parallel treasury (the Irad-i Cedid) and new taxes to fund it. But despite the government's best efforts to step on as few toes as possible, the measures it enacted, especially the new taxes, were more than enough to kick off a wave of discontent among the ayans and their subjects, who saw them as a shield which stood between them and a distant and corrupt royal court (2). Chief among these rebels was Osman Pazvantoglu, who not only ruled the strategic city of Vidin like a king but turned it into a refuge for bandits and renegade Janissaries who launched raids into Serbia and Wallachia. Having already defeated an attempt to bring his dominion back under imperial control in 1795, Pazvantoglu was now a dangerous figurehead for those opposed to the reformist agenda. He had to be crushed, and soon, before things spun out of control.

    With the way to Vidin clear thanks to the destruction of Kara Feyzi's bandit network, Selim issued firmans to multiple provinces demanding the recruitment of troops to form an army of gigantic proportions, as well as one authorizing Pazvantoglu's execution. After months of preparation and planning, a force of 100.000 men led by Grand Admiral Küçük Hüseyin Pasha (yes, the army was commanded by an admiral) was sent in the direction of the rebellious lord's stronghold, while a fleet sailed up the Danube to blockade it. The Siege of Vidin, which lasted from February to June 1798, was perhaps the single most important event in Selim's reign, the sultan and his allies investing nearly every bit of capital they had to ensure its success. Pazvantoglu made several preparations as well, turning the city into a fortress and recruiting peasants from all over his area of influence in the months prior to the imperial troops' arrival. Because of this the imperial army had immense difficulty penetrating Vidin's fortifications, with Hüseyin asking his sovereign multiple times for more and bigger cannons.

    Vidin eventually fell after five months and tens of thousands of casualties, the defenders running out of supplies faster than the besiegers did (3). The heads of Pazvantoglu and most of his inner circle - which included several Janissaries - were severed and brought to Constantinople as evidence of the sultan's triumph and a warning of what would happen to those who dared to defy his authority in the future. Though he and the rest of the Porte weren't out of danger yet, they at last obtained the victory they so desperately needed to continue with their ongoing projects and come up with new and far more audacious ones.

    These plans would have to be kept on hold for the moment, however, since word of the French invasion of Egypt poured into the capital within days of the capture of Vidin (4).

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This is OTL.

    (2) It is important to remember that even guys like Ali Pasha and Pazvantoglu invested in things like public works in the areas where their power was secure.

    (3) IOTL the siege failed due to a high level of desertion and difficulties with supplying the besieging army. Pazvantoglu was pardoned and eventually made a pasha by the sultan, and so what was supposed to be a huge campaign to rein the ayans in only made them even bolder than before.

    (4) There's an argument to be made that Napoleon's sudden arrival destroyed what was left of the besiegers' will to fight. I'm not sure of that, considering the little detailed information I found (for example, while one source says the siege lasted 5 months another says it lasted from late 1797 until July 1798) suggests the whole affair was a mess from the get go.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 3: Tripartite Struggle
  • ------------------
    Part 3: Tripartite Struggle


    If there was one European country with which the Sublime Porte could count on in general, it was France. The alliance between the two states was made in 1536, during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, and its objective remained the same for well over a century: mutual aid against their common enemy, Austria. The greatest examples of this alliance at work were the several joint military operations made by Paris and Constantinople in the Italian Wars, such as the siege of Nice and the invasion of Corsica (in 1543 and 1553, respectively), and Louis XIV's attacks on the Habsburg dominions in the 1680s, which ensured the Ottomans' territorial losses during the Great Turkish War weren't as catastrophic as they could have been. The attempts made to reform the military during the 18th prior to Selim III's accession were also spearheaded by French officers. It was this long history of cooperation that made the news of Napoleon's capture of Alexandria, on July 2 1798, all the more shocking.

    Egypt was an administrative oddity within the Ottoman Empire, even when its power was at its height. Before its conquest by Selim I, it was a sultanate ruled by the Mamluks, slave soldiers (usually of Circassian or Georgian origin) who had several privileges over native Egyptians, privileges they retained long after the transformation of the country from an independent state into an eyalet. So great was their power that, when the Mamluk Ali Bey al-Kabir launched a rebellion against Ottoman authority while the Porte was embroiled in the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774, he was defeated through treachery rather than conventional military means. The situation remained unchanged by the time of Napoleon's invasion, with Egypt being ruled by Murad and Ibrahim Bey and the authority of the various governors appointed by the sultan nothing more than a fiction. However, this meant the immediate task of dealing with the French fell on their hands, not the Porte's.

    Not only did they fail, they did so spectacularly. Nineteen days after taking Alexandria, Napoleon's army of 20 to 25.000 men inflicted a crushing defeat on a Mamluk force perhaps over twice its size, the invaders' infantry squares repealing several cavalry charges and inflicting as many as 10.000 casualties at the cost of just 300 men in what became known as the Battle of the Pyramids. Cairo fell shortly after, and Napoleon began to organize a new administration while Murad and Ibrahim fled to Upper Egypt and Syria, respectively. While any chance of Egypt becoming a French possession in the long term ended after the destruction of their fleet by the Royal Navy at the Battle of the Nile, Napoleon made multiple gestures to endear himself to its population, such as protecting the caravans of pilgrims who did the Hajj, but these policies fell on deaf ears for the most part thanks to the taxes he levied to sustain his army. Uprisings were common, and the people of Cairo itself revolted against their French occupiers on October 21-22, only to be subjected to a brutal crackdown.

    Girodet-Trioson_-_R%C3%A9volte_du_Caire._21_octobre_1798%2C_1810.jpg

    The Revolt of Cairo, as imagined by a French painter.

    While Bonaparte spent the remainder of 1798 consolidating his control of Egypt, the Ottomans devised a strategy kick him out. Their plan was to launch a two-pronged attack which, if timed correctly, would spread the already outnumbered French troops even thinner: one army would advance from Syria, and another would land somewhere in the Nile Delta with British assistance and march towards Cairo. But these preparations were hindered by worrying reports written by the governors of the eastern eyalets, who warned Constantinople that Agha Mohammad Shah Qajar, ruler of Iran and widely feared throughout the region thanks to the multiple atrocities (such as the sackings of Kerman and Tbilisi) his troops commited during his rise to power, had designs on Mesopotamia (1). That he was engaged in talks with French ambassadors since at least 1796 turned the chance of a Franco-Iranian invasion of the Porte's territories beyond the Taurus Mountains into a topic of serious discussion, and although it never materialized, the threat of it doing so was enough for tens of thousands of troops to be sent to the eastern border instead of reinforcing the army in the Levant.

    Aware that standing still would only hasten his demise, and of the Ottomans' worries regarding Iran, Napoleon took roughly half of all the troops he had (around 13.000 men) and marched into the Levant so as to protect his position from landward assaults for the time being, and thus allow him to better prepare for the inevitable naval landing. The French took control of El Arish after a brief siege on February 20, then captured Jaffa in early March. Everything went along swimmingly, or so it seemed, until they came upon the city of Acre, one of the Ottoman Empire's most important ports in Syria and the seat of power of Ahmad Pasha, better known by the epithet al-Jazzar (the butcher). Jazzar, who held the post of governor of the Sidon Eyalet, was an independent ruler in all but name, not unlike the most infamous Rumelian ayans, and like them he showered his capital with various public works and fortifications. The result was a city bristled with high walls and redoubts, as well as a strong garrison, reinforced by a contingent of troops drilled and equipped along the lines of the Nizam-i Cedid - the oncoming siege would be the New Order's first test against a foreign enemy.
    545px-1840%E2%80%9343_Royal_Engineers_map_of_Acre_%28close_up%29.jpg

    A map of Acre made in 1841, forty two years after the siege.
    In contrast to the well entrenched defenders, the French, who came within sight of Acre on March 20, were beginning to show signs of exhaustion. Their supply line was long and easily harrassed by the Royal Navy, which almost captured their siege guns two days before the siege began (2), and a growing number of soldiers showed symptoms of the bubonic plague, caused by an epidemic during their time in Jaffa. They were far from defeated, however, and they had both the very weapons they needed to reduce their target's fortifications, and no shortage of capable commanders. A furious bombardment marked the beginning of the siege, the attackers slowly bringing down the walls with each salvo, while the garrison's efforts to disrupt their operations were helped by two British ships, led by Sir Sidney Smith. They could also count a constant stream of reinforcements and extra supplies ferried by sea.

    After twenty two days of almost uninterrupted shelling, a breach was made in the wall on April 11, and French troops poured through right as the garrison was building a second line of defense (3). One more day of savage fighting ensued, the invaders having to take over Acre street by street, house by house, as much of the city's civilian population fought alongside the Ottoman troops in a desperate final attempt to kick them out. By the evening of April 12 the tricolor flew over the citadel, at the cost of almost 3.000 casualties. Most of the garrison was taken prisoner or killed, including Jazzar, whose death in combat against a numerically superior enemy turned him from a controversial figure (at best) into a martyr - another symbol of the empire's sorry state prior to the rise of the New Order was dead.

    With one of the strongest fortresses in the Levant now under his control, Napoleon could afford to let his men get some much needed rest. Departing Acre on April 15, the French marched inland, capturing the Galilee, before marching in the direction of Jerusalem, which capitulated without resistance. By the beginning of May the French were masters of the Holy Land, and Bonaparte personally visited various holy and historic places, from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre to the Dome of the Rock, his entourage of scientists documenting everything they could about their experience. The occupation of one of the holiest cities in Islam by an infidel army caused shock and outrage in the Ottoman court, and were it not for the Selim III's recent show of strength in Rumelia the Janissaries may well have launched a coup. But the more Napoleon advanced, the more his army shrunk with every garrison he was forced to leave on every conquered city, and after his capture of Jerusalem the number of troops he could field was reduced to a paltry 7.000 men.

    Hoping to score one more victory before he returned to Egypt, Bonaparte called for (and received) reinforcements from Cairo, increasing the size of his force to 10.000 soldiers, then marched towards Damascus. It was a risky manouver, since the men were taken from various garrisons scattered throughout Egypt, but the future dictator and emperor believed he had enough time to conquer his latest target before the Ottomans landed on the Nile Delta. Crossing the Jordan River in May 20, after which they defeated an Ottoman army of more than 30.000 men led by Abdullah Pasha al-Azm, governor of Damascus, the French approached the city on June 5 and, much like at Acre and other previous sieges, set up an artillery battery to bring down its walls. But while Damascus' defenses were less formidable than Acre's, the conduction of its siege had its own challenges to the French: their supply line was vulnerable to attacks by Bedouin raiders, and water was on low supply thanks to rising temperatures.

    June gave way to July, and not only did the besiegers run low on gunpowder and ammunition for their heavy guns, but the heat had become unbearable. Their old enemy, the plague, returned, killing or incapacitating thousands of soldiers, and Napoleon was about to withdraw when he received news of a disaster unfolding in Egypt: the Porte had begun its long-awaited counterattack, an Ottoman force of 18.000 men landing at Aboukir on July 14. Bonaparte raised the siege and ordered a retreat back to Cairo with all due haste, supposedly even suggesting that those in the army who were terminally ill should be euthanized so as to speed up its march, but even if this drastic measure was carried out it would take weeks for them to reach Egypt (4).

    The Ottoman commander, Mustafa Pasha, was a veteran of the Russo-Turkish War of 1787-1792, and knew that fighting the French with tactics like the ones employed by those before him was suicide (5). Aware that Napoleon was in Syria, he made a beeline for Cairo, during which his men found a large black stone covered with unknown inscriptions abandoned by the invaders while they were hauling it to the Egyptian capital for study. The Rosetta Stone, as it became known, was transported to Aboukir, and from there to Constantinople, as a spoil of war (6). The army came within sight of Cairo on July 27, and the Cairenes, realizing what was happening, rose up in revolt against their occupiers once more, and together they overran most of the city, forcing the French garrison to retreat to the citadel. They surrendered a week later under promises to be treated honorably, but several were later lynched by the mob, along with many local Copts who were seen as collaborators. Not intervening to stop this atrocity, Mustafa's forces left for Heliopolis, a few kilometers to the northeast, and built earthworks in preparation for Napoleon's arrival.
    751px-Cogniet_Leon_Bataille_D_Heliopolis.jpg

    The Battle of Heliopolis.
    The banners of the French army were sighted on August 17, and the Ottoman soldiers made their final preparations for a battle whose result would decide the outcome of the war in Egypt. With his 11.000 men exhausted after a month of almost nonstop marching under the scorching summer heat, Bonaparte was about to face an entrenched enemy whose troops outnumbered his own by a considerable margin. He staked his hopes on an all out attack at the dawn of August 17, which, if everything went according to plan, would catch his enemies by surprise and cause a panic. The French soldiers advanced shortly after the sun rose, covered by their artillery, but despite taking some of the outer earthworks they were pounced upon by their Ottoman counterparts, and a bloody slog dominated by bayonets and musket butts ensued. Slowly, after much hard fighting, their momentum vanished and they fell back.

    Having seemingly won the battle, the elated Ottomans prepared to launch a sortie from their fortifications to defeat the invaders once and for all. But their ranks were disorganized by the brutal hand to hand struggle, one wing actually retreating a little so as to get better cover from the French artillery, creating a gap in the Ottoman line. The commander of the French cavalry, Joachim Murat, saw the opportunity and led a charge that caught the defenders so completely off guard he burst into Mustafa's tent, slicing two fingers off the pasha's right hand with his sabre before getting shot in the jaw (7). The triumphant mood among the Ottomans turned to terror, and hundreds were cut down by the French horsemen as chaos reigned in their camp. Fortunately for them, by this point the French infantry was too tired to join in, which allowed Mustafa to rally his men and save the day for the star and crescent. Even so, the bravery of Murat and his men reaped its dividends: while the Battle of Heliopolis ended with an Ottoman victory, they were in no shape to bar Napoleon's retreat to Damietta.

    Trapped and with no hope of assistance from their homeland, the French capitulated on September 20, 1799 (8). Since Napoleon and most of his inner circle left for France earlier in the month, leaving nothing but a letter to be read to the soldiers, the instrument of surrender was signed by Jean-Baptiste Kléber (9). Mustafa was hailed as a hero by the Porte, one who scored the first major victory against a foreign army in quite some time, and one of his rewards was, unsurprisingly, the governorship of Egypt. But more than a prize, it was also a mission: the French invasion literally chased the Mamluks away, and it was the sultan's army, not theirs, that defeated them. He had a priceless chance to reshape Egypt into a province in line with Selim III's vision, and, if successful, take his family to the halls of power in Constantinople (10).

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) IOTL Agha Mohammad Khan (Shah after his coronation) Qajar was assassinated in June 1797, and Iran was plunged into turmoil for the next few years. This was a severe setback for a country already wracked by more than a decade of civil war before its reunification under his skilled and brutal leadership.

    (2) The French lost those guns IOTL, and Smith used them to harrass their position during the siege.

    (3) If Wikipedia is to be believed the French only breached the wall in May, after they got new heavy guns to replace the ones they lost, and by this time Acre's inner defenses were complete.

    (4) I made some research on the subject (very little, I admit), and it seems it's still a matter of debate whether Napoleon suggested this and if it was actually carried out.

    (5) Napoleon was already back in Egypt by the time Mustafa's troops took Aboukir IOTL, so he chose to dig in. While this was a better approach than just charging at infantry squares and hope for the best, the fact he did so at a narrow peninsula meant the Ottoman soldiers had nowhere to run if the French captured their defenses. Case in point, thousands of them drowned in a desperate attempt to return to their ships.

    (6) IOTL the Rosetta Stone was taken by the British and sent to London.

    (7) This is pretty much a word for word retelling of what happened at Aboukir IOTL, with the big difference that Mustafa isn't taken prisoner here due to this battle's very different circumstances.

    (8) It is a testament to Napoleon and Kléber's skills (and the abysmal quality of the Ottoman army and its leadership) that the French stayed in Egypt until August 1801.

    (9) IOTL Kléber was assassinated in Cairo in June 1800. Since the circumstances that led to this are butterflied away, he lives, returns to France and, spoiler alert but not really, becomes one of Napoleon's marshals.

    (10) According to his Wikipedia "article" (to call it barebones would be a compliment), Mustafa was an uncle of Muhammad Ali.​
     
    Part 4: New Soldiers for a New Army
  • ------------------
    Part 4: New Soldiers for a New Army


    Despite all the disruption and death it caused, it is a consensus among most historians that the French invasion of Egypt brought more good than harm to the Ottoman Empire, since it broke the Mamluks' power, showed the imperial military the flaws of the tactics it employed and ended with a victory that did much to enhance the Porte's prestige (to domestic and foreign audiences alike) at a time it was at its nadir. However, while it is clear the government turned the lemons Napoleon gave them into lemonade, his actions accelerated an ongoing trend, rather than start it: the state had already suffered its fair share of traumatic defeats by the time of Selim III's accession to the throne, and it was also beginning to reassert its authority over its most distant areas, as shown by Osman Pazvantoglu's ultimate fate. It can even be argued that Constantinople's control over Rumelia actually weakened somewhat, due to the need to redirect attention to Egypt and Syria instead of pressing its advantage (and potentially bring Yanina back under the imperial fold) after the fall of Vidin.

    Still, the thousands of casualties suffered during the war gave the sultan and his allies the excuse they needed to ramp up recruitment for the troops of the Nizam-i Cedid. The number of soldiers who belonged to the new corps was steadily growing since its inception, from a few hundred during the last Russo-Turkish War to 2.536 men and 27 officers in 1797, to 4.317 men and and 30 officers at the time of the French surrender in Damietta in September 1799, according to surviving records. The revenues collected by the New Treasury were also on the rise, thanks to the now constant collection of the taxes devised to fund it and the seizure of wealthy agricultural properties whose owners didn't pay their fair share of them - which prompted others to comply before they were next on the chopping block (1). The reconquest of Egypt allowed the government to apply this same policy in the fertile farmlands of the Nile, and since many of the Mamluks who would otherwise manage the latifundia were either dead or hiding, the New Treasury's coffers were flooded with new cash from roughly 1800 onward.

    It should, therefore, be no surprise that the Nizam-i Cedid was expanded to a considerable degree after the turn of the century. New barracks were built just beyond the Bosphorus, at Kadikoy and Uskudar, well within sight of the capital, and a conscription system was established throughout Anatolia in 1802. The new soldiers also began to be trained to serve as cavalry, rather than just as infantrymen like the original unit (still stationed on the other side of the Golden Horn), and they were given incentives such as tax exemptions and full salaries as soon as their training began, which were especially alluring for poor peasants who would likely have turned to banditry otherwise (2). The presence of foreign advisors became less and less noticeable as time went by, as they were replaced by officers they trained or, better yet, veterans from the war with the French, whose firsthand experience fighting what was then the strongest army in Europe was invaluable. One such veteran was Muhammad Ali, a nephew of Mustafa Pasha who earned the Porte's attention through a combination of proven skills and political connections (3).

    But tensions simmered beneath all the ceremonies, drills and parades. The final clash with the Janissaries would come sooner or later, and Constantinople's streets, palaces and coffee houses were rife with rumors, conspiracies and plans to counter them.
    nizam i cedid.jpg

    The Nizam-i Cedid army parading before Selim III and the rest of the imperial court.
    And there was one place, the Sanjak of Smederevo, where the armed confrontation between conservatives and reformists had not only already begun, but raged for years. Its governor, Hadji Mustafa Pasha, was an early enthusiast of the New Order's reforms, and so he was appointed in 1793 under orders to rein in the sanjak's Janissaries, who had effectively taken over the local administration. They were also accused of committing treachery in the last Austro-Turkish War, during which they surrendered Belgrade after a siege that lasted a little less than a month (in their defense they were hopelessly outnumbered). But despite his energy (made all the more impressive by the fact he was in his sixties) and the sultan's official backing, he was almost completely alone, surrounded by bandits and Janissaries who sought to return to power almost as soon as they were kicked out. To make matters worse they were supported by Osman Pazvantoglu, whose stronghold of Vidin was much closer to the sanjak than Constantinople could ever hope to be, and together they launched raids that threatened Belgrade itself.

    Thus, Hadji Mustafa had no choice but to ask the local Serbian knezes (lords or princes), many of whom openly aided the Austrians just years before, for help. They had little love for the Janissaries and their rapacious behavior, and so began an alliance that would change the Balkans forever: in exchange for their loyalty to the Sublime Porte, the knezes were granted the right to collect taxes in the place of previous Ottoman officials (many of whom were either corrupt or in league with the very people Hadji Mustafa fought against), a measure backed by a firman (decree) issued by the central government. The pasha's performance in Belgrade was deemed satisfactory enough for him to be appointed to the governorship of the Rumelia Eyalet in 1797, a move which granted him nominal authority over most of the central Balkans, from the Danube to Albania and northern Greece. Although his real power was diminished by the presence of Ali Pasha in Yanina and the Bushati family in Iskodra, he still played a vital role in Pazvantoglu's defeat in 1798, and as a result he was given ample leeway to enact whatever measures necessary to solidify Constantinople's authority in the Balkans (4).

    To say that he took his orders to heart is an understatement, as shown by his decision to create a Serbian militia, recruited and led by the knezes, in the months following the siege of Vidin. The reason for this drastic step was simple: banditry was still rampant throughout Rumelia, even if less organized after Kara Feyzi's death, and, with the bulk of the imperial army in Egypt and Syria, something had to be done before a second Pazvantoglu rose up. But no justification, no matter how valid, could mitigate the outrage with which most of the Ottoman political and religious establishment reacted (5). Even if the empire's ethnic and religious minorities were tolerated (an attitude most noticeable during its glory days, when the rest of Europe was torn apart by wars of religion), they were still very much seen as second class citizens. The idea of giving them weapons was unthinkable, not least because of the chance they could turn those same weapons against the state.

    It is said that Hadji Mustafa had to travel to Constantinople and personally convince the sultan not to sack him, and even though he kept the governorship of Rumelia until his death in 1808 (6), his creation of a mostly Christian militia cost him a potential promotion to the always coveted position of grand vizier. Such martyrical interpretations must always be taken with a grain of salt, however: Ottoman historians (especially Serbian ones, for obvious reasons) elevated him to near sainthood in the mid 19th century, a selfless statesman who began the arduous work of reconciling marginalized Christian populations with the greater Ottoman state at the expense of his own career - in other words, the first supporter of Ottomanism (7). It is possible that he was kept as governor simply because there was no one more suited to implement Selim's agenda in the Balkans without alienating too many people - the ayans and Janissaries (two of its most powerful groups) had to be dealt with, after all, and the support or at least acceptance of the New Order by the various Christian minorities was invaluable. And what better way to secure their allegiance than by directly integrating them into the reforms?
    389px-Aleksa_Nenadovi%C4%87.jpg

    Aleksa Nenadović, knyaz of Valjevo and one of Hadji Mustafa Pasha's main allies among the Serbs (8).
    Matters between the court and its various opponents finally came to a head in 1806, and the fact they did so in that year was likely no coincidence: the Napoleonic Wars had been raging for three years by this point, and, after the battle of Austerlitz, only Prussia - which would soon reveal itself to be a paper tiger - and Russia stood between the young French Empire and domination of Europe. That Napoleon wanted the Porte to declare war on Saint Petersburg was, thus, no surprise, and neither was his not-so-subtle threat to invade Rumelia from Dalmatia if he didn't get his wish (9). The fear of a French army rampaging in the Ottoman heartland (even though the bulk of their forces was actually in Germany and, later, Poland) added up to the cauldron of conspiracies swirling in Constantinople's streets, and it was worsened by Selim's refusal to yield to their pressure - he couldn't afford an entanglement in foreign affairs when the Nizam-i Cedid's strongest enemy was about to rear its head (10).

    The spark that set things off was the announcement, in April 1806, of a plan to construct barracks for the new army similar to those in Anatolia (which had spread from their starting point in the northwest to cover the entire peninsula) throughout Thrace, starting with Edirne and Tekirdag. Thousands of imperial troops were dispatched to the two cities, nominally to suppress bandits, only for their garrisons (made up mostly of Janissaries) to mutiny and block their path. The rebels then asked for help from Ismail Aga, ayan of Rusçuk and one of the most powerful figures in the eastern Balkans, only for him to side with the government out of either genuine loyalty or self preservation (11). Outnumbered and with no hope of relief, the mutineers surrendered a little over a week after launching their revolt, and the long awaited "Thracian tumults" amounted to nothing. But while the reformists celebrated their latest victory, the Janissaries of Constantinople added the final touches to a conspiracy years in the making, one so advanced they even had a replacement for Selim - his older nephew and heir, Mustafa.

    Months passed, and the sultan and his allies became increasingly complacent - it seemed their enemies preferred to go out with a whimper, rather than a bang. It wasn't until very early in the morning (a few minutes after the clock struck midnight, in fact) of June 8 that they realized just how wrong they were. Thousands of Janissaries - some belonging to Constantinople's garrison and others from elsewhere, who snuck into the city days or months prior - took to the streets, and the Ottoman capital's inhabitants woke up to furious shouts and the sound of gunfire. Overwhelming the drowsy and unprepared loyalists with ease, the rebels captured several strategic locations throughout Constantinople and converged on the Topkapi Palace, which they stormed without difficulty.

    It was at that moment that their plan began to unravel: no matter how hard they searched the palace and its myriad of rooms and corridors, none of the conspirators managed to find even a single (male) member of the House of Osman - not Selim, not Mahmud (his other nephew) or even Mustafa. Just how exactly the sultan and the two princes escaped is still a mystery - the most famous and fanciful story, that they disguised themselves as women and hid in the imperial harem, is almost certainly fiction. Whatever was their method, it was successful, and the Janissaries' coup devolved into a riot as they took out their anger on Constantinople's population and any reformists they found. Fires broke out, creating columns of smoke that became visible from kilometers away after the sun rose. And with it came the government's reaction.

    20.000 Nizam-i Cedid troops from Anatolia, led by Muhammad Ali, crossed the Bosphorus and forced their way into Constantinople, the locals supposedly helping them in their efforts due to their longtime hatred of the Janissaries. Even so, it took them hours of confusing street battles to retake the imperial capital and drive the rebels back to their barracks, which was then subjected to a bombardment that left at least 4.000 Janissaries dead, along with scores of civilians who had the misfortune of living nearby. Not unlike with Napoleon in France more than a decade before, the wily Albanian's ruthless performance earned him the praise of his superiors, who hailed him as the man who saved the empire with a "whiff of grapeshot".
    380px-ModernEgypt%2C_Muhammad_Ali_by_Auguste_Couder%2C_BAP_17996.jpg

    Muhammad Ali Pasha, the man of the hour.

    Selim returned to the Topkapi Palace with his nephews in tow (it is still a matter of debate whether Mustafa was loyal to his uncle all along or ditched the putschists at the last minute) late in the afternoon, long after the guns fell silent, and promptly issued a firman declaring that the Janissary Corps was to be wholly disbanded and replaced by the Nizam-i Cedid. Any member who resisted would face either death or exile, and their properties were confiscated. The Irad-i Cedid was merged with the normal treasury, a measure which allowed the new army to finally grow as much as it needed to protect the Ottoman Empire's vast borders. And not a moment too soon, since both France and Russia would look at them with dangerous eyes in the next few years.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This is all OTL, at least according to the
    source I used.

    (2) Same as above.

    (3) He's too interesting a character for me not to use.

    (4) IOTL the failure of the siege of Vidin marked the beginning of the end for Hadji Mustafa Pasha's rule. The Janissaries were allowed to return to Belgrade in 1799 (probably covered by the same amnesty Pazvantoglu got) and assassinated him two years later. The
    First Serbian Uprising started as a revolt against their reign of terror, before the rebels turned their weapons on the Ottoman state itself as well.

    (5) This militia was formed IOTL as a consequence of Pazvantoglu's victory, but even if he's defeated the empire will still be stretched thin, and with few troops it can actually rely on.

    (6) Hadji Mustafa was in his late sixties at the time of his murder, so he probably wouldn't have lived more than a few years.

    (7) From what I understand, Ottomanism was an attempt to create a singule, Ottoman identity to counter the constant nationalist uprisings the empire suffered from in the 19th century. It eventually floundered as its European territories continued to shrink, especially after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78.

    (8) IOTL he was executed by the dahije (the Janissaries who took over Belgrade after Hadji Mustafa Pasha's assassination) along with dozens of other Serbian knezes in 1804.

    (9) Napoleon pressured the Ottomans to go to war IOTL, but I don't know if he actually threatened to invade. It's not exactly out of character for him, though.

    (10) According to the research I made, Selim III seems to have been both intelligent but also a bit of a weak-willed chump IOTL. He declared war on Russia in December 1806, a decision that proved disastrous for him since the Russian navy blockaded the Dardanelles and caused the food riots that led to his deposition. ITTL he has more of a spine thanks to the successes he and his allies have been enjoying since 1798, so he doesn't fall under the influence of French ambassador Horace Sébastiani.

    (11) IOTL Ismail Aga sided with the Janissaries and threatened to march on Constantinople, forcing Selim to withdraw his troops to Anatolia. This was a mortal blow to his authority, and, together with the war against Russia, paved the way for his downfall in May 1807.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 5: Napoleonic Interlude
  • ------------------
    Part 5: Napoleonic Interlude


    While the Ottoman Empire fought a long struggle against its centuries-old past, a new one was busy turning almost all of Europe into a battleground. Napoleon's failure to conquer Egypt and Syria, a campaign that ended with him and his inner circle abandoning their men to their fate, did not stop him from becoming military dictator of France in November 9 1799, mere months after his return. Under his leadership, and that of generals such as André Masséna, Louis Desaix (1), Jean-Baptiste Kléber and many others, the French Republic reversed the defeats it suffered during the opening stages of the War of the Second Coalition, and secured the conquests it acquired in the 1797 Treaty of Campo Formio (the left bank of the Rhine and puppet states in northern Italy, Switzerland and the Netherlands) with the Treaty of Amiens, signed on March 25 1802.

    The Peace of Amiens was a brief one, with France and Great Britain declaring war on one another barely a year later, but it wouldn't be until April 1805 that the Third Coalition, made up of Austria, Britain, Naples, Sweden and Russia was completed. It was during this gap in hostilities in the continent that Napoleon was crowned emperor of the French, after a referendum whose result was known long before the first vote was cast. But although the Coalition's armies were formidable on paper, they were separated from one another by huge distances, and were thus extremely vulnerable to being defeated in detail by a force like the Grande Armée, whose speed of manouver was unprecedented thanks to the corps system. Case in point, the newborn French Empire drew first blood with a crushing victory at Ulm, in which an Austrian army of 72.000 men led by Karl Mack was forced to surrender after its line of retreat was cut off.

    Napoleon followed up on this triumph a month and a half later with his magnum opus, the Battle of Austerlitz, and Austria was finally forced to make peace, ceding territories like Venetia, Istria, Dalmatia and Tyrol to various French allies or puppets and paying an indemnity of 40 million francs. But while Vienna struck its colors, Prussia joined the fight in October 1806, alarmed by the creation of the Confederation of the Rhine, an alliance of German states under firm French tutelage, not unlike the "sister republics" it possessed before its imperial days. No matter: the Prussian army, marred by corruption and incompetence, was easily swept aside in the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, the latter of which saw a single French corps, led by marshal Desaix, defeat a Prussian force over twice its size (2).

    Berlin fell a few weeks later, and though king Frederick William III fled to Konigsberg rather than seek terms, the truth was that only Russia was in a position to resist France's growing might now, as the latter's armies advanced into Poland. Even so, the fighting to come would be among the most savage in all of the Napoleonic Wars - winter had arrived, and both sides' logistics were strained to the breaking point. The Russians, led by Levin August von Bennigsen, attempted to launch a surprise attack, but retreated after their Cossacks captured a French courier carrying orders that revealed a plan to encircle them, not unlike what happened to the Austrians at Ulm. Napoleon pursued, and Bennigsen finally made a stand near the village of Eylau, just to the south of Konigsberg.

    1178px-Battle_of_Eylau_1807_by_Jean-Antoine-Sim%C3%A9on.jpg

    The Battle of Eylau.

    What ensued was a two day long bloodbath unlike anything seen in the Napoleonic Wars so far. After capturing the village in what may or may not have been a skirmish that got out of hand, the French launched a frontal attack that was caught in the middle of a sudden snowstorm and torn apart by the Russian artillery. The Russians counterattacked soon after, and almost captured Napoleon - though he managed to escape, the emperor's horse was shot under him, an event that threatened to throw his already bloodied army into disorder (3). With defeat imminent, he ordered marshal Murat, the dashing cavalry commander who saved the day at Heliopolis almost a decade before, to lead a massive cavalry charge that caused enough havoc among the Russians to buy time for reinforcements under Desaix to join the battle.

    The Russian left wing was slowly driven back, forming a 45 degree angle with the center, but before the French could advance further they were checked by the timely arrival of a Prussian contingent of 9.000 men under general L'Estocq and forced to fall back. Another French corps, led by marshal Ney, finally joined the fray after being delayed by bad weather and roads, but made little progress against the Russian right. Both armies fought well into the night of February 8, before withdrawing to their original positions to rest and regroup. Though neither side held a decisive advantage over the other just yet, Napoleon's position was clearly worse than Bennigsen's, and another day's fighting could've brought about disastrous results for the Grande Armée. So he ordered a retreat (4).

    For the first time since its ruler's coronation, the French Empire had suffered a defeat in the battlefield. The soldiers' morale, already sapped by the harsh winter and homesickness, fell to a level unknown until then, while celebrations broke out in cities like Moscow, Stockholm, Konigsberg and, of course, London. But while the French were predictably despondent, the Russian position was even worse: their logistics were horrendous, their victorious army in no shape to pursue its enemy, and even if it did it was still outnumbered on the strategic level. Thus, despite shattering Napoleon's invincibility, the Battle of Eylau made no great difference in the front lines.

    It wasn't until mid to late March 1807 that things got going once more, as the French laid siege to the port of Danzig to secure their rear and allow them to focus all of their strength against the Russians. Their efforts were hampered, however, by the arrival of a relief force of 8.000 Russian troops led by count Nikolay Kamensky, as well as that of a British sloop carrying 150 barrels of much needed gunpowder, in May 10 and 16 respectively (5). The defenders' dogged resistance forced Napoleon to divert more forces to assist in its capture, and convinced Bennigsen to finally go on the offensive in early June, when his army mauled but failed to destroy an isolated French corps at Guttstadt.
    Panoramic_view_of_the_Siege_of_Gda%C5%84sk_by_French_forces_in_1807.PNG

    A panoramic painting of the Siege of Danzig.

    Having lost the element of surprise, he ordered a retreat before his outnumbered forces were caught and forced to fight a battle they were certain to lose, and Napoleon set off in pursuit. The emperor made a grave miscalculation by thinking that his enemy was retreating northward, to Konigsberg, when the Russian army was in fact marching northeast, back to the safety of its own empire's territory. This gave Bennigsen another opportunity to attack a lone French corps, this time at Friedland, but before his men could score a victory he received word that the main body of the Grande Armée was marching to its aid. He thus ordered the retreat to resume, turning what could've been a major battle into an unremarkable skirmish (6).

    June came to an end, and although Danzig finally fell and Konigsberg capitulated without a fight, knocking Prussia out of the war for good, the French were still no closer to defeating the Russians, who crossed the Neman river unmolested. The calls for peace became deafening among the soldiers, and not just the French ones, because Russia's finances were in tatters after two years of nonstop fighting all over Central Europe. Thus, when Napoleon called for a truce, the Russian tsar, Alexander I, accepted it without delay, feeling that the humiliation suffered at Austerlitz had been avenged by Eylau and the French emperor's failure to score a decisive victory over Bennigsen's army (7). The two monarchs met at Tilsit on July 10, and after weeks of discussion their diplomats hammered out the Treaties of Tilsit, which stipulated, among other points, that:​
    1. Prussia would lose up to a third of its territory to various newly created French puppet states, such as the Duchy of Warsaw and Kingdom of Westphalia;​
    2. Russia would relinquish control of the Ionian Islands to France, the only territorial loss it suffered;​
    3. Russia would join the Continental System, and thus cease all trade with Great Britain;​
    4. Napoleon would divorce his current wife Joséphine and marry one of Alexander's sisters, namely grand duchess Catherine Pavlovna. The marriage took place in Paris, on May 26 1808, a few months after the French emperor's divorce (8).​
    From Tilsit onward, two of Europe's strongest countries were allied not only by paper and ink, but by blood. They were, it seemed, free to act as they pleased in the continent, and so their gazes turned to the three states who still dared to defy the Continental System: Portugal, Sweden and the Ottoman Empire.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) I butterflied Kléber's death away already, so I might as well save Desaix too.

    (2) Desaix and Kléber surviving means Davout either never becomes a marshal ITTL or only does so a few years later. Probably the latter, since Desaix was a friend of his.

    (3) According to the Wikipedia article on Eylau, Napoleon was almost captured before the Imperial Guard showed up.

    (4) The lack of a Russo-Turkish war breaking out in 1806 means the Russians can send a couple more thousand troops to East Prussia. Not the amount of troops sent to the Danubian Principalities IOTL (40.000 soldiers) since their logistics were bad enough already, but enough to make their army at Eylau just a little bit stronger. This, combined with Napoleon's injury in the battle, convinces him that it's better to retreat.

    (5) These relief attempts failed IOTL, with Kamensky delaying his attack for a few days (thus giving the French time to prepare for it) and the British ship running aground. Because of these failures Danzig fell on May 24, before Bennigsen went on the offensive.

    (6) Bennigsen was ill at Friedland IOTL, and as a result only ordered a retreat when it was too late.

    (7) This means that Tilsit is seen less as Napoleon's ultimate moment of triumph and more like a peace of exhaustion. This means Alexander feels less humiliated, and is thus more open to establishing a genuine alliance with France.

    (8) Napoleon was on the lookout for a new wife as early as 1808, and his first choices were grand duchesses Catherine and Anna Pavlovna. Negotiations floundered and he eventually married Marie Louise, but since relations with Russia are better ITTL he ends up with a Romanov wife.
     
    Part 6: The Bear and the Crescent (I)
  • ------------------
    Part 6: The Bear and the Crescent (I)


    While most of Europe received the news of Tilsit with joy, save for Britain and some sour grapes in Berlin and Vienna, the Ottoman ruling class in Constantinople greeted it with an uneasiness shared by the generals stationed throughout the Balkans and eastern Anatolia. With France and Russia not only no longer fighting each other, but forming an alliance, they were now free to focus their attention elsewhere, and the one state against whom they both held grudges was none other than the Ottoman Empire.

    That they both wanted to take it down a peg was beyond predictable, since Napoleon still dreamed of extending Paris' influence into the eastern Mediterranean and avenging his Egyptian adventure, while Alexander wanted to score an easy victory and weaken the Ottoman military before the reforms of the Nizam-i Cedid took hold for good, which would prevent Russia from bullying its southern neighbor at its leisure. This, in turn, would put a decisive stop to St. Petersburg's long term ambtition of securing free passage for its (military) ships through the Dardanelles and the Bosphorus straits, and was seen with such alarm by its uppermost circles that an invasion of eastern Sweden was shelved in favor of focusing everything they could muster against the Ottomans (1).


    Thus, the period between July 1807 and March 1808 was one of mounting tensions along the Russo-Ottoman frontier, with movements of Russian troops being reported by Ottoman agents just beyond the Dniester River (the border between Russia and the Ottoman-controlled Principality of Moldavia) and the Caucasus. Though the latter had a veneer of plausible deniability - Russia was at war with Iran, and had been since 1804 - the former made their intentions all too clear. France, meanwhile, sent diplomats to Yanina to covertly sway Ali Pasha to their cause: with the Royal Navy blowing every ship bearing the tricolor out of the water almost as soon as it left port, the only route of invasion into the western Balkans available was overland, through Dalmatia and Bosnia, which just so happened to possess some of the harshest terrain in Europe. A fifth column was critical under these conditions, but Paris' hopes were dashed when he refused to aid them in any way. He couldn't afford to incur the Sublime Porte's wrath, not when its authority over Rumelia was at its strongest point in decades.

    The last straw finally came in March 26 1808, when the French ambassador, Horace Sébastiani, relayed a message to the Ottoman government demanding it to sever all ties to Britain and, most damningly, relinquish control of the Danubian Principalities to Russia. The letter was a bait, really, a way to get the Sublime Porte to declare war first and thus look like an aggressor, and it fulfilled its purpose without flaw: Selim III ordered Sebastiani's expulsion from Constantinople that same day, then declared war on France and Russia.

    After sixteen years of peace, the bear and the crescent would face each other in the battlefield once more.
    SebastianiTassaert.jpg

    Horace Sébastiani, French ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from 1806 to 1808.
    His performance was deemed satisfactory enough to eventually earn him the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    80.000 Russian soldiers, led by the freshly promoted field marshal Bennigsen (2), marched into Moldavia within a week of the war's declaration, their swift advance aided by a majority Orthodox population who welcomed their brethren of faith as liberators. By mid to late April all lands north of the Danube were under Russian control, as Ottoman garrisons scattered throughout the Principalities withdrew rather than fight an enemy with superior numbers. This was in accordance with the strategy devised by their senior commanders, who bet on a defensive posture anchored on the strength of their main fotresses on the southern bank of the Danube, namely Vidin, Rusçuk and Silistra. This approach was adopted because of their shortage of troops trained along the lines of the Nizam-i Cedid, since its reforms were implemented in the Balkans barely two years prior. The cautious Bennigsen made no move against the Ottoman defenses for the moment, choosing instead to settle down and build his own earthworks in strategic areas in preparation for a counterattack that, little did he know, wasn't coming any time soon.

    The Caucasus front couldn't be more different. The Russian commander there, Ivan Gudovich, was a hardened veteran of the previous Russo-Turkish wars, but the resources at his disposal were much, much smaller than Bennigsen's. The movement of troops up and down the Caucasus Mountains was a logistical nightmare, and as if that weren't enough the Russians were already bogged down in a war against Iran, forcing them to stretch their already meager (numerically speaking) forces even thinner. The Ottomans, meanwhile, could count on an army far better trained and equipped than its Rumelian counterpart, since the first troops of the Nizam-i Cedid were organized and drilled in Anatolia after all. Gudovich went on the offensive nonetheless, but his attempt to take the fortified town of Akhaltsikhe in May 4 ended with a bloody failure.

    His Ottoman counterpart, Yusuf Pasha, decided that the time had come for him to begin his own advance, and set his sights on Gyumri, a town in eastern Armenia that was nominal Iranian territory but was under Russian occupation, reaching it in May 17. His 20.000 soldiers faced only 7.000 Russians, and to make matters worse for the latter Gudovich was mortally wounded by shrapnel, depriving them of a capable leader in a pivotal moment of the battle that ensued (3). What remained of the Russian army retreated to Tbilisi, while Yusuf made preparations to invade Georgia. Though this attack was checked near Marabda, just to the south of Tbilisi itself, the Russians only saved the Georgian capital by stripping their conquests in northern Azerbaijan almost bare of troops, giving the Iranians the chance they needed to retake the initiative in their own war (4).

    The naval front didn't go any better for St. Petersburg, either. Though the Black Sea Fleet was better led and equipped than its immediate opposition - the Ottoman navy was sorely neglected by the New Order's reforms - they were stopped from causing too much damage by the timely arrival of a Royal Navy squadron led by vice-admiral John Duckworth. The British presence only increased as time went by, and by the end of the war the Black Sea Fleet had no choice but to cower behind Sevastopol's defenses. London's intervention in the war also brought over a million pounds in subsidies, a vital boost to Ottoman finances at a time spending skyrocketed for obvious reasons (5).
    lossy-page1-999px-Sir_John_Thomas_Duckworth%27s_action_in_the_Dardanelles%2C_19_February_1807_RMG_BHC0576.tiff.jpg

    A Russian squadron being destroyed near the Dardanelles.

    But the events unfolding at sea and in the Caucasus front, while annoying setbacks for the Russian military, were only a sideshow. The bulk of the war would be fought (and won) in the Balkans, and the two empires' respective monarchs became increasingly annoyed at the glorified staring contest their commanders held along the Danube. The Ottomans, egged on by their successes on the other fronts, blinked first, and their highest ranking general in Rumelia, Alemdar Mustafa Pasha, crossed the great river at the head of an army of 40.000 men near Giurgiu in June 2. His plan was to recapture Bucharest before the Russian armies scattered all over Wallachia (which outnumbered his own by a considerable margin) could concentrate and smash him. Unfortunately for him, his audacious design fell apart when his men engaged a small but heavily entrenched Russian detachment at Calugareni a few days later, which stubbornly resisted multiple Ottoman assaults for a day and a half. This was just enough time for a large army under general Pyotr Bagration to come to its aid, and Mustafa only barely escaped with his life as most of his army was crushed between the Russians and the Nealjov river.

    The debacle opened a huge hole in the Ottoman defenses, and the aggressive Bagration sent a flurry of messages to Bennigsen, urging permission to strike while the iron was hot. He made a beeline for Rusçuk as soon as he received word of his superior's authorization, surrounding the fotress with all the heavy artillery he could bring to bear and obtaining its surrender in June 19, after a week's bombardment. The Russians at last obtained a bridgehead on the southern side of the Danube, but unfortunately for them their advance stalled soon after, hampered by bad roads and their foes getting their act back together in time to stabilize the front line. The staring contest resumed, and June gave way to July, which in turn gave way to August, without much fanfare (6).

    The Sublime Porte used the respite to reinforced its bloodied Rumelian army with Nizam-i Cedid troops from Anatolia, and Bagration badgered his superior to allow him to launch another offensive, this time against Silistra, before the Ottoman forces there became too powerful and campaign season came to an end. Bennigsen finally relented in August 12, and 55.000 Russian soldiers left Rusçuk shortly after, marching along the right bank of the Danube and reaching Silistra's outskirts in the twenty-second day of that month. The defenses there were far more formidable than Rusçuk's - Silistra was the gate to Dobruja and eastern Bulgaria, after all - and the garrison had just been reinforced a few days prior to the Russians' arrival. Bagration was forced to settle down for a long siege, and his men set up batteries that aimed either at the fortress itself or along the Danube, to prevent the arrival of ships with supplies or reinforcements to the defenders.
    800px-Silistra_Festungsplan.jpg

    A map of Silistra's fortifications dating from the mid 19th century.

    But the garrison would prove itself to be the least of the besiegers' worries. Roughly a week into the siege, a relief army of some 60.000 men, led by Alemdar Mustafa Pasha (who grasped the chance to redeem himself after the disaster at Calugareni with both hands) came into view, and after a few days of rest after much marching through bad roads and difficult terrain, attacked near Kalipetri. The delay allowed the outnumbered Russians to make preparations to hold them off, and they were helped by the decision of the garrison's commander, Seydi Ali Pasha, not to launch a sortie while the battle went on. Still, the besiegers didn't score a decisive victory, and they found themselves trapped between Silistra and Mustafa's army.

    The relief force attacked again, in the same spot, on September 2 and 5, and though they failed to dislodge the Russians once more, every move they made against the besiegers gave the garrison a vital respite, as well as chance for them to finally launch a sortie that destroyed some of their siege works and damaged others. A riverine fleet carrying 4.000 men and various supplies also made its way past the Russian batteries on September 13, giving Seydi Ali's men a critical morale boost at a time Bagration's army had begun to capture some of Silistra's outermost redoubts. It wasn't until October 18, after several battles with the relief army and subsequent sorties, that the Russian artillery breached the main city wall, and even then their assault was beaten back with heavy casualties.

    Their failure to storm Silistra in that attack assured the end of any chance of the siege ending with a Russian victory. With temperatures dropping further with each passing day, Bagration ordered his army to retreat back to the northern side of the Danube on a pontoon bridge, so they could wait out the coming winter in friendly territory. To the Porte's horror, Alemdar Mustafa Pasha made no attempt to stop their withdrawal, and his (likely true) explanation that his army was just too tired and bloodied to partake in any more attacks fell in deaf ears. With hostilities coming to a halt as both sides took shelter in their winter quarters, the Ottoman army in Rumelia was placed under the command of a man who was both experienced in military matters and a personal favorite of the court: Muhammad Ali Pasha.

    Constantinople also took advantage of the lull to engage in further politicking with London, securing from it a promise to deliver more aid, not just in ships and money, but boots on the ground (7).

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) IOTL the Finnish War had two purposes: first, to restore some of Russia's military prestige after the humiliations suffered at Austerlitz and Friedland, and to keep Finland from being used as a potential springboard into St. Petersburg. Since one of the factors has already been dealt with in the previous chapter, and St. Petersburg has plent of defenses already (Kronstadt, Vyborg, etc), I figured it would be plausible for the Russians to put whatever plans they have for Sweden in the backburner.

    (2) Since he scores a clear victory over Napoleon at Eylau and keeps his army from being destroyed ITTL, Bennigsen gets a promotion.

    (3) Gudovich won a battle under those odds IOTL, but was injured so badly he had to retire from active command for a few months. Since the Ottoman army is in much better shape here, he loses both the battle and his life.

    (4) I intend to write a chapter on Qajar Iran - and its war with Russia - sometime in the future. Hopefully it'll at least be plausible.

    (5) This is a role reversal from IOTL, where the British sent a squadron to force their way through the Dardanelles and later invaded Egypt in an attempt to support Russia (the 1806-12 Russo-Turkish War began before Tilsit, after all). Both operations failed.

    (6) Despite all the problems the Ottomans had in the 1806-1812 war IOTL (massive instability, an unreformed army, the First Serbian Uprising, Russian naval dominance and so on), its ultimate result was, all things considered, a stalemate. The Russians were operating at the end of their logistical tether, and couldn't advance much further than Silistra and the Dobruja. They actually "won" by abandoning their gains, inciting a large Ottoman army (led by the grand vizier in person) to cross the Danube, and holding it hostage after defeating it in battle.

    (7) The British tried to send a few thousand soldiers to Sweden to help them in the Finnish War, so I figured something similar could happen here.
     
    Part 7: The Bear and the Crescent (II)
  • ------------------
    Part 7: The Bear and the Crescent (II)


    Though military movements were out of question for obvious reasons during the winter of 1808-1809, the Russian and Ottoman governments remained as active as ever, perhaps even more since they didn't need to worry about the front line for the next few months. Unsurprisingly, they both spent their free time badgering their allies for more support, or, in the Russians' case, anything at all - Alexander I was reportedly infuriated with Napoleon's decision to meddle in Spanish affairs, triggering the Peninsular War, rather than help his army by launching some kind of offensive in the western Balkans, logistics be damned. The Sublime Porte, meanwhile, urged Great Britain to deploy troops to reinforce the flagging Ottoman positions in the Balkan front, and London's reply came in the form of 15.000 soldiers led by John Moore, which landed in Kostence and joined the main Ottoman force just before the snow melted (1).
    391px-Sir_John_Moore_by_Sir_Thomas_Lawrence.jpg

    John Moore, commander of all British forces in Rumelia.

    Another matter that worried the combatants was money. War was never a cheap enterprise, and the Russian treasury had less than a year to recover from the strain it went through during the wars of the Third and Fourth coalitions. Worse still was the fact St. Petersburg's entry into the Continental System was beginning to show its effects in the form of a drastic fall in exports and a rise in the prices of luxury goods, to the discomfort of the same elite that murdered Alexander's father and predecessor Paul I. The one sector of the economy that grew was manufacturing, thanks to the lack of British industrialized goods in the Russian market, but it wasn't enough to make up for the problems elsewhere (2).

    The Ottoman exchequer was also in a tough spot despite British subsidies, and the people in charge responded in the only way they knew, by raising taxes. This measure worsened a fiscal burden which had only grown since the start of the New Order, and, combined with the harsh winter and the devastation brought about by thousands of soldiers left and right, many of whom stole or extorted money and food from peasants and townsfolk whenever they could, prompted people to become bandits or, worse, rebel against Ottoman authority outright. The worst disturbances and riots happened in northern Bulgaria, especially at Plevne, and in the sanjak of Nis. The latter was an especially worrying development, since, due to the sanjak's Serbian majority, it was feared the discontent there could spread to Belgrade and spur the knezes into action. Though indispenisble allies in the supression of the Janissaries, many in Constantinople feared they would defect to the Russians if given a chance, due to their mutual Orthodox faith.

    That was exactly what Bennigsen and the other Russian commanders hoped would happen, and because of it they made Vidin the target of their next campaign. It wasn't until Russian troops were sighted in the outskirts of the city in question, in April 2 1809, that the Ottoman leadership, which until then believed their enemies would make another attempt to take Silistra and thus concentrated the bulk of their forces there, realized the enormity of their mistake. To make matters worse, many of Vidin's once fearsome fortifications were neglected or even torn down in the years after Osman Pazvantoglu's defeat, out of fear they could be taken over by another rebel. The end result was that, much like what happened at Rusçuk, the Ottoman garrison surrendered in April 10 rather than keep fighting against impossible odds. The path to Serbia was open, and now all Bennigsen and his colleagues had to do was wait for the knezes' inevitable rebellion. And so they waited.

    And waited.

    And waited.

    They had seriously underestimated just how loyal the Serbs of Belgrade were to Constantinople now, even those like Đorđe Petrović, who fought against its authority once and was exiled before his eventual amnesty by Hadji Mustafa Pasha (3). They had a status no other Christian population under Ottoman rule possessed, and they weren't willing to risk it to help a foreign army which was facing mounting difficulties since last year. The Russian high command was paralyzed by indecision, with Bagration and like-minded officers calling for an invasion of Serbia to "nudge" the knezes in the right direction while Bennigsen refused, arguing such a move would strain Russian logistics far too much and turn the Serbs against them for good. This stalemate allowed Muhammad Ali to redeploy the bulk of his forces westward, and prepare an attempt to kick the invaders back to the other side of the Danube.

    The two armies clashed at Dunavci, just south of Vidin itself, but the battle that ensued was an indecisive slog since the Russians withdrew to Calafat in good order, despite their inferior numbers. Delayed orders and lack of coordination ruined the day once more, and Moore's men barely saw any action because of this, much to their irritation. Muhammad Ali Pasha hadn't yet scored the great victory he needed to secure an appointement to the grand vizierate, and recapturing Vidin wasn't enough. So he greenlit an advance against Calafat, the first step of a campaign to kick the Russians out of western Wallachia, and hopefully all of it by the end of the year. Calafat fell without resistance in May 4, and two days later 70.000 Ottoman and British soldiers finished crossing the Danube.

    It was at this moment, right when Muhammad Ali's grand design was about to unfold, that everything ground to a halt thanks to a panicked report from Constantinople: the French, it seemed, had finally made their move. Having had enough of his brother-in-law's pestering, Napoleon finally authorized the transfer of an army corps of roughly 30.000 men to Dalmatia overland (marching through Austrian territory in the process), after which they were put under the command of the local governor, general Auguste de Marmont. He and his army left Spalato right as the Battle of Dunavci was being fought, and reached the strategic city of Köprühisar in May 2. The swiftness of his opening move and the ease with which he entered Bosnia soon roused suspicions of collaboration by the locals, since Bosnia was a Janissary stronghold and was engulfed by a revolt that was quashed just before hostilities with Russia began (4).

    Still, despite all the panic it caused at first, Marmont's campaign was every bit as doomed as Napoleon's attempt to conquer Egypt and Syria a decade before: he had no real objective beyond stirring things up in western Rumelia and pulling back before the Ottomans smashed him. With Köprühisar secured, his next target was Travnik, then the capital of the Bosnia Eyalet, but it proved to be too tough a city to take, even for the mighty Grande Armée. For starters the terrain separating them from their destination was nothing short of atrocious, with many mountains, hills and forests that provided perfect hiding spots for guerrillas, which were already showing how effective they could be in Spain. Second, all three of Bosnia's main ethnoreligious groups - Orthdox Serbs, Catholic Croats and Muslim Bosniaks - were apathetic to the invaders at best, in case of the first group, or hostile, like the latter two, for reasons ranging from anti-clerical policies back home to bad behavior (read: looting) by the soldiers in general.

    The result was that, despite not fighting a single pitched battle whatsoever, Marmont didn't reach the outskirts of Travnik until May 18, much later than he'd planned, and by then the city was abandoned, with nothing worth taking in sight. Despondent and receiving ominous reports that the population of Köprühisar was about to revolt against its occupiers, something that would cut his army's supply line, he ordered a retreat back to Spalato. He had lost a third of the men under his command, most from starvation and disease, though their continuous harrassment by guerrilla bands undermined their morale to an extent Marmont would later call Bosnia "My Little Spain" in his memoirs.

    As big a failure as it was, Marmont's adventure still hindered the Ottoman war effort by forcing Muhammad Ali to sit still in Calafat for more than two weeks before it became clear he wasn't going anywhere. This, in turn, gave the Russians the chance they needed to concentrate their forces in the Danubian Principalities for a decisive battle. Trapped on the wrong side of the Danube, the Ottoman and British troops had only one way out if they were defeated. The clash that decided the outcome of the Russo-Turkish War of 1808-1809 was fought at Poiana Mare, just east of Calafat, in May 29 1809. The Ottomans were outnumbered on the battlefield for the first time, with 70.000 of their troops against 80.000 Russians. Their greatest disadvantage wasn't raw numbers, but in how many guns they had, an amount a quarter smaller than what their enemies possessed. If they were to win, they needed to put the right troops in the right places.
    %D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B5.jpg

    The Russian army in the days before the Battle of Poiana Mare.

    And that was the very subject where Muhammad Ali and John Moore found themselves on opposite ends of a major disagreement, with the former wanting the British soldiers to be put in the center of the army to serve as an anchor against the veteran Russian infantry. The latter argued his men would not only suffer immense casualties there, but they were, despite their training, less experienced than their Ottoman colleagues, who held the line just fine (for the most part) during the first year of the war. The ambitious pasha acquiesced to his point almost at the last minute, and the redcoats were positioned in the left wing of the Ottoman army. Bennigsen and his generals, meanwhile, was understandably confident of victory, and sought to crush their opposition with superior numbers and firepower.

    The Battle of Poiana Mare began, as any battle fought in that period, with an artillery duel. An eerie lull came over the battlefield once the guns fell silent, the Ottomans not wanting to risk an attack against a superior foe while the ever cautious Bennigsen hoped his enemies would march to their death just like Augereau's corps did at Eylau. When this did not happen, he ordered all his men forward. This was, of course, easier said than done, with some units moving ahead of others due to delayed or unclear orders, creating gaps in the Russian line and lessening the intensity of their attack. As the infantry's advance faced difficulties, the Cossacks found a worthy adversary in the Ottoman akinjis and delis, who let out what would be their last hurrah before their eventual disbandment (5).

    Casualties mounted as the two armies pushed against each other for hours on end, both of them calling their reserves to plug in any gaps in their ranks, until the Russian right flank started to buckle under the pressure. Moore's redcoats saw their chance and pushed on until their immediate opposition gave way, then fled. With the rest of the Russian troops already fully engaged in various other points, the British were free to wheel around and hit them in the rear with everything they could, just as the main Ottoman line was stretched near its breaking point.

    Seeing the catastrophe that could engulf his army if the fight went on any longer, Bennigsen ordered a retreat. All in all, the Battle of Poiana Mare was no different than most of the other engagements that took place in the Danube theatre of the war, the main difference being the amount of blood shed in the field: both sides lost roughly a quarter of their armies, or 40.000 men in total. Still, there was no hiding the fact the Russians had suffered a clear defeat, and their morale, already sapped by the lack of any decisive victories so far, plummeted. The streets and palaces of Constantinople were awash with official and spontaneous celebrations, and though no longer a holiday, May 29 is still known among some circles as "the day the retreat stopped" (6).

    The days following the battle were uneventful as the Ottomans and Russians licked their wounds and waited for reinforcements. Since the former were much closer to home, theirs arrived sooner, and so Muhammad Ali ordered a march to Craiova, and from there to Bucharest, while the chance to do so without fighting another major battle was still available. Craiova fell after a skirmish in June 13, and after the Olt river was crossed a few days later, the way to Bucharest was open. Its capture in July 1 signaled the end of the latest Russo-Turkish War - any chance St. Petersburg once had of reverting hostilities to its favor was now gone, and the only thing the Russian diplomats could do was hope the victors' terms would be lenient.

    Which was exactly what happened, to their immense relief. The combination of the Sublime Porte's lack of designs on Russian territory and London's hope of steering tsar Alexander away from Napoleon's orbit led to the Treaty of Bucharest calling only for an exchange of prisoners, the payment of an indemnity of two million pounds by Russia (just enough to cover the Ottoman Empire's wartime expenses) and the recognition of the Danubian Principalities as Ottoman territory. Still, the Bear's prestige was shaken, with its military, which delivered Napoleon his first defeat since his coronation, having lost to a state that was, until then, seen by most of Europe as a rotting edifice one good kick away from collapsing.
    640px-Hanul_lui_Manuc%2C_1841.jpg

    Mauc's Inn, the place where the Treaty of Bucharest was signed.

    Though underwhelming when compared to the succession of cataclysms that were the Napoleonic Wars, the Russo-Turkish War of 1808-1809 had shown the Ottomans weren't a pushover anymore, while the Russian Empire, though undeniably powerful, had many issues to deal with, issues that would take time to sort out. The Porte and its British allies were now free to deal with the French positions in Dalmatia and the Ionian Islands, while Austria and Prussia began to smell blood in the water.

    Napoleon's ongoing ulcer was about to get one hell of a lot worse.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) The British dispatched this force to Sweden IOTL in an attempt to help them in the Finnish War. They never got to land because of disagreements with King Gustav IV, and were instead sent to Spain, where Moore eventually met his end.

    (2) I've decided to combine the usual consensus on how Russia dealt with the Continental System with some info I learned about in this site.

    (3) Better remembered today as
    Karađorđe ("Black George"), who led the First Serbian Uprising IOTL.

    (4) Bosnia was engulfed by a major revolt a few years after Mahmud II abolished the Janissaries IOTL, so I figured something similar could happen here.

    (5) The akinjis and delis were disbanded after the Auspicious Incident IOTL, as part of Mahmud II's reforms.

    (6) There's an almost identical quote in the Wikipedia article about the
    Battle of the Sakarya, so you can guess where I got my inspiration.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 8: More Housecleaning
  • ------------------
    Part 8: More Housecleaning


    Much like with the French invasion of Egypt, the overall effects of the Russo-Turkish War of 1808-1809 are still a subject of fierce academic debate. On one hand it cemented the rise of one of the Ottoman Empire's most capable grand viziers, gave it a vital prestige boost and, by pulling it into the Napoleonic Wars, ensured Constantinople would get a seat in the Congress of Frankfurt. On the other, it forced the Porte to focus all its attention on stopping the Russian advance in the Caucasus and the Balkans, allowing various other issues that afflicted the empire's wellbeing elsewhere to fester. Lastly, the war proved to be an immense burden to the treasury, even with British subsidies and the Russian indemnity secured by the Treaty of Bucharest, and the tax hikes imposed to make up for it showed just how fragile the New Order's foundations still were, despite everything that had already happened.

    Thus, despite getting a hero's welcome upon his return to Constantinople and becoming grand vizier in July 27 1809, Muhammad Ali Pasha had no time to rest on his laurels.

    The biggest issue affecting the empire by far was one that, despite being a much smaller threat than Russian expansionism on paper, struck the very heart of its legitimacy in the eyes of the vast majority of its subjects, the sultan's position as caliph of Islam. One of the main foundations of the Ottoman monarch's status as such was control over the cities of Mecca and Medina, which was threatened by the rise of the Emirate of Diriyah, in central Arabia. Its ruling dynasty, the House of Saud, not only expanded their state from a backwater to a force to be reckoned with in Arabian affairs from the 1740s onward, but followed an interpretation of Islam different from that of the House of Osman, which led to them excommunicating one another once it became clear they weren't willing to compromise.

    The Saudis became increasingly bold by the beginning of the 19th century, launching destructive raids that went as far as Iraq and Syria, and sacked the Shia holy city of Karbala in one occasion, plundering the tomb of Husayn ibn Ali. With the Sublime Porte's attention focused first on dealing with the Janissaries and then the growing Russian threat, the Saudis were free to conquer Mecca and Medina, and eventually all of Hejaz, by the end of the Russo-Turkish War. This, combined with their destruction of the tombs of various saints there, much like what they did at Karbala, was an unacceptable challenge to Selim III's authority, and so he sent Muhammad Ali to crush them.
    1122px-First_saudi_state.png

    The Emirate of Diriyah at its height, just before the Ottoman-Saudi War.
    Red arrows indicate Saudi attacks and raids, yellow ones Ottoman movements.

    Source

    Arriving in Jerusalem on September, the freshly appointed grand vizier dispatched a flurry of letters to the governors of nearby provinces, calling for the gathering of troops in preparation for a campaign to retake the holy cities and chase the Saudis back to Najd. This proved to be a harder task than anticipated, since many of the eyalets south and east of the Taurus Mountains were either poor and neglected (a situation made worse by the Saudi raids) or ruled by local potentates who couldn't care less about what Constantinople wanted. It wasn't until early November that he had an army of some worth, one whose troops came mostly from Egypt, which was governed by another rising statesman, Hurshid Pasha, since March 1804 (1).

    Eager to score some victories of his own and bolster his political career, Hurshid secretly prepared his own campaign, even as he obeyed Muhammad Ali's orders by sending tens of thousands of soldiers to Jerusalem. As the grand vizier and his army of 30.000 men marched down the Hejaz, slowly advancing towards Medina, Hurshid and a force of 10.000 troops suddenly landed near Jeddah, its surprised and vastly outnumbered garrison surrendering the great port without a fight on November 22. With the path to Mecca open, the ambitious governor advanced on it without delay, retaking it on December 1 with much fanfare. Though this turn of events made his own offensive in the north much easier, Muhammad Ali was anything but pleased: he was infuriated, in fact, with this blatant attempt to steal his thunder (2). He ordered Hurshid to return to Cairo immediately, while his army was taken over by the grand vizier's 20 year old son Ibrahim (3).

    By this point the Hejaz was back under Ottoman control, and so Muhammad Ali returned to Constantinople to personally make sure his position in its ever fractious politics remained strong. All Ottoman forces in Arabia were put under Ibrahim's command, and though a capable soldier he was still untested as a commander - the fact he only held his position thanks to his father didn't help. As if that wasn't enough, the task ahead of him was, without a doubt, the most difficult of the entire war: he had to march into Najd and attack Diriyah itself, which entailed marching through hundreds of kilometers of desert.
    640px-Diriyyah2.JPG

    The ruins of Diriyah.

    And yet Ibrahim carried out the orders assigned to him without flaw, reaching the outskirts of the Saudi capital on March 1810 and laying siege to it with a force of 7.000 men until September that year, when it capitulated. Once one of the richest cities in the Arabian Peninsula, Diriyah was razed to its foundations, while dozens of members of the House of Saud were sent to Constantinople to be either imprisoned or executed (4). Some of them survived, but now they were just one dynasty among many, as the once unified Najd fell into chaos.

    Back in the Ottoman capital, his son's victory against the Saudis brought Muhammad Ali's prestige to new heights, and the first thing he did with it was convince Selim III to demote Hurshid Pasha from his position as governor of Egypt. He was put in charge of a small army of 30.000 men and sent to help Austria in the War of the Fifth Coalition (first by capturing Dalmatia and then joining the main Austrian armies in the Danube front (5)), a gesture that both earned Vienna's gratitude and rid Muhammad Ali - for the time being - of someone who was shaping up to be a very dangerous rival. His position as the Ottoman hierarchy's de facto top dog secured, the grand vizier was free to take on the less glamorous side of governing, which involved managing near literal mountains of paperwork.

    The elephant in the room was, of course, the economy. Though war was once a very profitable business for the Sublime Porte in the distant past, one that earned it much plunder and thousands of unfortunate men, women and children who were sent to one of the empire's many slave markets, it was clear to all that, had it not been for Britain's "golden cavalry", its treasury would've likely run out of money during the Russo-Turkish War of 1808-1809. Its neighbors were either too strong for Constantinople to bully into giving yearly tributes, or not worth the effort.

    On the domestic front, the demise of the Janissaries and (some of) the ayans wasn't enough to make up for the decades of neglect and corruption, which resulted in bad infrastructure and rampant banditry, especially in the more distant eyalets. The wars with France, both the current one and Napoleon's ill-fated invasion of Egypt and Syria, also had deleterious effects to the economy of the regions in question (and the empire as a whole, of course), not only because of the physical devastation they brought - Acre hadn't fully recovered yet, a full decade later - but because of the ceasing of all trade between them and what was until then one of the main markets for their exports.

    Thankfully for the Ottoman state, the ever fickle international situation of the early 19th century presented it with an opportunity to make up for that loss in a big way: after years of growing tensions with Great Britain over the issue of impressment, the United States of America finally declared war on its former overlord on August 4 1809 (6). This cut London off from one of its textile industry's main sources of cotton, and Egypt and Syria (Palestine in particular) were in a perfect position to replace it (7). The end of the Napoleonic Wars opened up the French market, and its own growing manufacturing sector, to Ottoman cotton, and by the mid 19th century its exports would account to a third of the empire's total revenues, while eventually feeding its own nascent industry as well.
    Alexandria 1855.png

    The port of Alexandria, the exit point of most of the Ottoman Empire's cotton, in the mid 19th century.
    Source

    But money was something one could never have too much of, and one source which had the potential to bring in massive revenues for the Sublime Porte was tariffs on the imports of foreign goods. Unfortunately, the Ottomans were forced to keep them low by a series of treaties known as Capitulations, which granted various privileges, such as tax exemptions and protection from prosecution by local laws, to merchants of various European countries. They began to be signed back when the empire was at the peak of its power, but were now yoke around its neck that, besides stopping it from tapping into the sheer volume of foreign trade it received effectively, also ensured its internal market would be overrun by European manufactured goods (especially British ones), preventing the rise of a native industry.

    Thus, when the Congress of Frankfurt first convened in May 1811 to redraw the map of Europe after the end of the Napoleonic Wars, the Ottoman delegation's main demand wasn't territory - save for the restoration of the Republic of Ragusa, in southern Dalmatia, as a client state - but an end to the Capitulations (8). Austria, which did the lion's share of the work in ending French hegemony over Europe and was grateful for the military assistance provided by Constantinople during the war, accepted it without issue, as did most of the other members. The main exception was Great Britain, but, with no one else willing to back it, London had to settle for gaining control of the Ionian Islands, in what was one of the many headaches it had while the Congress was gathered.

    With war no longer something to worry about and new sources of income making it possible to invest in multiple areas without threatening the Nizam-i Cedid's budget, Muhammad Ali embarked on a massive infrastructure program that lasted from 1813 until his retirement in 1838, with sporadic slowdowns. The largest and most famous project by far was the construction of the Selimiye Road, a modern highway which, upon its completion in 1822 (after nearly a decade of construction), linked Constantinople to Belgrade (9). Another well known work was the Mahmoudiyah Canal, which ensured Alexandria would have a constant supply of fresh water from the Nile and assured its rebirth after years of neglect (10). Smaller roads were built in other eyalets, such as the ones linking Aleppo and Jerusalem to Alexandretta and Jaffa, respectively.
    balkans.gif

    An unfortunate side effect of this boom in road and canal building was an explosion of cases of graft and other types of corruption, as huge, inflated amounts of money were either handed to developers with connections to the state (connections often earned through bribery) or stolen by corrupt middlemen. To make matters worse, Selim III withdrew more and more from active governing as the years went on, his age catching up with him, the responsibility for the tasks he once fulfilled falling into the hands of Muhammad Ali and his allies. Ibrahim Pasha was made governor of Egypt in 1825, and it was clear to all in the court that, unless something was done, he'd succeed his father as grand vizier.

    The House of Osman was in danger of losing control over the empire they built and saved.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) He became governor of Egypt at this time IOTL too, but as Muhammad Ali's puppet.

    (2) An immensely ironic turn of events, given Muhammad Ali's tendency to go on independent campaigns IOTL.

    (3) Ibrahim led the final campaign against the Saudis IOTL too, so I figured he could do the same here, despite being even younger, thanks to some good old fashioned nepotism.

    (4) All of this happened IOTL, the difference being that here it does so several years earlier.

    (5) I'll address this version of the War of the Fifth Coalition in the next update. For now, all I'll say is that Austria waits a little longer before challenging France once more.

    (6) Basically an earlier War of 1812.

    (7) AFAIK Britain's main source of cotton at this time was India rather than the US, but the Wikipedia article on the War of 1812 says they importend roughly 80% of all American cotton, so I figured a conflict would still hurt British industry in some way.

    (8) IOTL the Capitulations were only abolished in 1914. I figured that, given their much stronger position ITTL, the Sublime Porte would have enough prestige to convince the Coalition to let them do so a century earlier without much issue.

    (9) The US began to build the National Road roughly around this time period, so I figured something like this is plausible if Ottoman finances are strong enough to withstand the cost.

    (10) This canal is OTL, and was built during Muhammad Ali's reign as Egypt's de facto king.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 9: The Ulcer...
  • ------------------
    Part 9: The Ulcer...


    While Alexander I prepared to flex his muscles against an enemy who he thought would be easy to defeat, Napoleon, increasingly drunk on his own propaganda after scoring easy victories against almost every European army save the Russian one, embarked on a vanity venture which would bring about catastrophic consequences for his empire. With only Portugal, Sweden and the Ottoman Empire not adhering to the Continental System after the Treaties of Tilsit, he had a convenient excuse to invade one of these countries, and he chose the first one.

    Once one of the great powers of the world, and the first European country to establish an overseas empire, Portugal was now long past its prime, crippled by years of chronic mismanagement in almost every level and an unequal relationship with Great Britain that reduced its diplomatic position to near vassalage. Though clever and skilled in the art of statecraft (a trait often overlooked in favor of his physical appearance, which by many accounts was incredibly ugly), prince regent and future king John VI had little hope of defeating a French invasion in battle - the Grande Armée was, at this point, almost invincible. Thus, once the French, led by general Jean-Andoche Junot, crossed the Spanish-Portuguese border on November 19 1807, John and the rest of the Portuguese royal court (some 10.000 people, along with huge amounts of documents and treasure) fled for Brazil, abandoning Lisbon just days before Junot's men arrived.

    1018px-Embarque_da_Fam%C3%ADlia_Real_para_o_Brasil_-_Nicolas-Louis-Albert_Delerive%2C_attrib._%28Museu_Nacional_dos_Coches%29.png

    The Portuguese court embarking on their transports.
    The conquest of Portugal had another side effect, which was the passage of French troops through Spain. Though an ally of Paris, Napoleon had little love for the country and its royal family, seeing it as backward and them as corrupt, and so he concocted a plan to take it over from the inside and remake it in his own image, as he had already done to many European countries. To accomplish this, French garrisons were put in various strategic places and cities throughout Spain, ostensibly to maintain order but really to make sure his impending coup succeeded seamlessly. The presence of a foreign army inside its borders worsened domestic tensions in the country, and king Charles IV and his much hated favorite Manuel Godoy were overthrown by a popular uprising in March 1808. Spain's new king was the young and untested Ferdinand VII.

    Napoleon finally had the opportunity he needed to put his plan in motion. With the pretext of wanting to settle the dispute for the Spanish throne, he sent messages to Charles and Ferdinand calling for them to meet with him in Bayonne. Once they were there, the French emperor forced them to abdicate in favor of his brother Joseph, while the quarreling Bourbons were sent to France and put in house arrest.

    The Spanish people's reaction was immediate and ferocious. Revolts broke out in several major cities and all over the countryside, led by peasants, soldiers and townsfolk, and whatever hope the occupiers had of subduing them with the resources they had in hand evaporated when the Spaniards handed them a crushing defeat at Bailén,in which at least 17.000 French soldiers were captured. The French position in Spain collapsed not long after, with Joseph hurriedly fleeing Madrid for the relative safety of the Ebro valley. The Spanish War of Liberation had begun.

    Without a king to lead them, the Spanish authorities established a junta made up of elected representatives from Spain's various provinces, who convened in Madrid under much celebration before they began their work. In Portugal, the cataclysmic string of events that followed Bailén prompted the people there to rebel as well, and the country's liberation - a quick affair compared to the horrific slog its eastern neighbor was forced to face (1) - was secured by the arrival of a British army under Arthur Wellesley, who defeated the French forces in Portuguese soil at the battles of Roliça and Vimeiro. Junot and his 21.000 men, who had conquered Lisbon the previous year, were forced to surrender unconditionally, their weapons and loot falling into British and Portuguese hands (2).

    Batalha_do_Vimeiro.jpg

    The Battle of Vimeiro.

    The succession of catastrophes engulfing the French in the Iberian Peninsula shattered their aura of invincibility for good, and those in Austria and Prussia who argued for the renewal of hostilities against Paris gained ground in their respective countries' governments rapidly. Enraged, Napoleon decided to invade Spain in person, mustering 200.000 of his best men for a campaign in which he sought to crush the country and its "army of bandits and monks" in one fell swoop. The Spanish had just 80.000 troops to resist this steamroller by the time the campaign began on November 1808, and to make matters worse most of their men were raw and inexperienced, save for the division led by the marquis of La Romana. Thus, they had no choice but to retreat.

    Even so, the emperor's advance was far from painless. At Valmaseda, Spanish general Joaquín Blake suddenly turned on his pursuers and encircled a French division, forcing it to surrender after several unsuccessful attempts to break out, bringing 13.000 prisoners into Spanish captivity (3). Further south, at Tudela, imperial marshal Jean Lannes suffered a bloody draw after he attacked an entrenched Spanish army led by Francisco Javier Castaños (the victor of Bailén) head on, believing they were out of position due to inaccurate reconnaissance (4). Still, the Spaniards kept retreating, lest they end up encircled by the various French army corps, and the Supreme Central Junta evacuated Madrid just before Napoleon's troops reached its outskirts on December 1.

    He immediately ordered the city's surrender, lest he obliterate it with his artillery, but the madrileños, emboldened by the victories their country had scored since the start of the war, refused (5). What ensued that was a siege that, despite its relatively short duration (from December 1 to 18 - a little over two weeks), was easily one of the bloodiest and most brutal engagements of all the Napoleonic Wars. True to Napoleon's word, the French artillery was merciless, with repeated cannonades day and night destroying entire neighborhoods, while the infantry poured into the streets, only to be met with a hail of bullets and everything that could be used as a weapon, from cooking utensils to bricks and stones. The Spanish capital had to be conquered street by street, building by building, as civilians fought alongside soldiers to the last man.

    As if the situation in Madrid itself wasn't grim enough, Napoleon had to deal with a guerrilla band led Juan Martín Díez threatening his communications with France, while what remained of most of the Spanish field armies, bolstered by the arrival of Wellesley's troops after a long march from Portugal, made preparations to relieve the city. They failed to save Madrid, reduced to a heap of rubble when the siege ended, but they still pinned Napoleon's army down and inflicted thousands of casualties upon it (6).

    800px-Prado_-_Los_Desastres_de_la_Guerra_-_No._05_-_Y_son_fieras.jpg

    This artwork by Francisco Goya depicts Spanish women fighting French soldiers with anything they could get their hands on.
    While not protraying any specific battle, scenes like this were likely a common sight in the siege of Madrid.

    Meanwhile, far to the east, another great Spanish city prepared to withstand its own siege, the second it was to go through in four months.

    The capital of Aragon, Zaragoza was defended by troops led by general José de Palafox, who fought at Castaños' side at Tudela, and tens of thousands of civilians who helped by building barricades and taking up weapons themselves. Facing them was a French army led by general Jeannot de Moncey, who was forced to delay siege operations until reinforcements came from other fronts. Palafox's men, meanwhile, were rested, well supplied, heavily fortified and with good morale after their victory at Tudela, even after news of Madrid's fall came. Said morale would be put to the test from December 27 onward (7).

    The second siege of Zaragoza was, as with almost every engagement fought during the Spanish War of Liberation, rife with brutal fighting and one atrocity after another. The city bristled with ramparts and redoubts, and it took the French one whole month for the outer defenses to be taken. The city wall, a relic from the Middle Ages and wholly unsuited to withstand cannon fire, was breached a few days later, and the invaders rushed in, only to be greeted by a maze of barricades and kill zones. Thus began the siege's most savage phase, one the Spanish had planned for since the beginning. By this point Moncey had already been replaced as commander of the French forces with marshal Lannes, but not even his talent and bravery could avert the bloodbath his men were about to go through.

    Every house was a fortress, every church tower a vantage point for Spanish snipers. Though Lannes adopted a strategy of taking over Zaragoza at a slow pace, neighborhood by neighborhood, to minimize casualties, they still mounted at an alarming rate as the defenders fought back every French move with heroic tenacity. As if that weren't enough, the dreadful sanitary conditions caused by the siege turned it into a hotspot of disease, which, despite affecting both sides equally (Palafox himself was bedridden by the time it ended), lowered the invaders' morale even further. Still, their advance continued, and by late February 1809 they were in control of most of the city. Victory was in sight, if at a terrible cost.

    Then, on February 23, disaster struck, as Lannes was shot in the throat by a sniper while leading an assault against one of the last strongpoints held by the Spaniards, dying on the spot in seconds (8). The French soldiers' morale, already in shambles after two months of disease, winter weather and nonstop fighting against an enemy who refused to surrender no matter the situation, cratered, and they began to withdraw. By the next day Zaragoza was silent, the victorious Spaniards too weak from hunger, sickness and sheer exhaustion to celebrate. Only a third of the original garrison of 32.000 men was still in fighting shape, and 35.000 civilians out of a population of some 50.000 were dead.

    570px-Santa_Engracia_-_Lejeune.jpg

    The assault on Santa Engracia's monastery.
    Though Zaragoza survived the siege, the monastery did not.

    Still, their bravery had paid off, and Napoleon's enemies throughout Europe cheered upon learning the Grande Armée had suffered yet another defeat. The French position in Spain was perilous: though they controlled much of the north and Madrid itself, the Spaniards' control of Zaragoza meant their only route of supplies and communication from France was through a relatively narrow stretch of land in Navarre. The rich plain of Andalusia, nerve center of the Spanish resistance due to the Supreme Junta making itself at home in Seville, was out of their reach, as was Portugal.

    And yet Napoleon himself wouldn't be able to do anything about it, since he received a string of worrying reports from Berlin and Vienna.


    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) The worse French position in Spain means Portugal won't be invaded again ITTL, and so it will be spared from the worst of the war.

    (2) IOTL the French were allowed to return home with all their weapons and loot as a result of the Convention of Cintra, which Wellesley objected to but was forced to obey. Here he gets his way and Junot is completely defeated.

    (3) The French fought their way out of the Spanish trap IOTL, though they were forced to abandon their baggage train.

    (4) IOTL the Spanish were out of position (their army was divided in two groups too far away to support each other), and they were smashed.

    (5) Madrid surrendered without a fight IOTL.

    (6) Since the madrileños fight instead of surrendering, Napoleon isn't able to chase the British to the sea. Naturally, this means relations between London and the Spanish resistance are better ITTL, since the latter saw the retreat to Corunna as a betrayal.

    (7) I figured it'd be plausible to delay the start of the siege for a week, given the troubles France is facing elsewhere in Spain.

    (8) As a consequence of the siege of Zaragoza being even more difficult for the French since the Spanish have better morale and more time to prepare their defenses, Lannes ends up leading from the front even more than usual, to lift his soldiers' spirits. This ends up causing unfortunate consequences, for the invaders at least.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 10: ... the Eagle...
  • ------------------
    Part 10: ... the Eagle...


    News of the disaster the French Empire was facing in Spain sent shockwaves throughout Europe. Anti-Napoleon partisans in many countries, several of whom knew next to nothing about Spain or its people, suddenly praises to the victors of Bailén, the martyrs of Madrid and the defenders of Zaragoza, who, in spite of their forces' deficiencies on multiple areas, inflicted defeat after defeat on the Grande Armée, with every defeat they themselves suffered often being too costly for the invaders. In Austria and Prussia, two countries whose armies and territories were trampled by French boots just a few years ago, the calls for renewed hostilities against Paris grew louder with each passing day, to the exasperation of those who insisted they weren't ready for war yet.

    One such individual was Archduke Charles, commander-in-chief of the Austrian army and emperor Francis I's younger brother. With the pro war party in Vienna becoming ever more aggressive in its calls for military action to liberate Germany from French rule, he only barely convinced Francis to resist these demands for the time being, arguing that, besides the various reforms he was implementing on the Austrian army (such as the adoption of the corps system, and better tactics) not being complete yet, the Habsburgs couldn't risk incurring the wrath of Russia. More time was needed, he argued, so that the French could continue to bleed themselves in Spain, and tsar Alexander's fury at his brother-in-law's Iberian adventure festered further (1).
    800px-Charles%2C_Archduke_of_Austria_-_Lawrence_1819.jpg

    Archduke Charles, duke of Teschen.

    Another strong argument in Charles' favor was the situation Prussia, whose help would be critical to kick Napoleon out of Germany, was in. The Prussian military was torn to shreds during the War of the Fourth Coalition, and the loss of over a million subjects due to the territorial concessions imposed upon the kingdom at Tilsit left the Prussian economy a shell of its former self. The changes Prussia had to go through to recover were far more drastic than Austria's, and needed more time to be enacted as a result.

    Thus, despite the war party's protests, 1809 was a peaceful year in Central Europe, albeit the uneasy kind of peace everyone knew to be the calm before a storm - Napoleon himself was increasingly nervous, afraid to send reinforcements to his subordinates in Spain despite their mounting losses. As the snow began to melt in February 1810, Charles made preparations to invade Bavaria, a French ally, massing 150.000 men on its eastern border, while Francis secured a secret agreement with Alexander promising Russia would not intervene in the coming war. He also engaged in negotiations with the Ottoman Empire, which promised to send some 30.000 men to help tie down French forces in Dalmatia and, once they were dealt with, reinforce Austrian movements elsewhere (2).

    Only Prussia, put under multiple new limitations after a letter from a minister revealing its talks with Vienna was intercepted by French agents, wavered, but the Austrian high command hoped they would still join the war on their side once the Grande Armée suffered a few defeats (3).

    Napoleon, not wanting to look like the aggressor, left the French forces in Germany under the command of Louis-Alexandre Berthier, his most senior marshal, while he stayed in Strasbourg, ready to leape into action as soon as hostilities began with fresh reinforcements. Thanks to his extensive network of spies, he was somewhat aware of what were the Austrian armies' objectives, and could guess, with some accuracy, when they would begin their march: on or after March 15 (4).

    He was wrong.

    Charles' advance began on March 10, and the offensive that ensued showed how different the Austrian army was from the outdated, lumbering machine that was defeated at Ulm and Austerlitz. Marching along both banks of the Danube at stunning speed, the Austrian forces converged upon Regensburg, occupied by an isolated French corps and home to a vital river crossing. Berthier, though a brilliant chief of staff, was out of his depth as a commander, and gave the corps in question no order to retreat. By the time Napoleon arrived to replace him, it was too late. In an eerie role reversal of the Ulm campaign almost five years before, III Corps, surrounded on all sides by Austrian forces outnumbering it several times over, was forced to surrender (5).

    News of the Capitulation at Regensburg spread like wildfire throughout Germany, and a wave of nationalist sentiment comparable to what France itself went through during its revolution ensued. Riots broke out against against French garrisons in multiple states, while in the Tyrol Andreas Hofer led a rebellion against Paris' Bavarian underlings, taking over several mountain passes in the Alps. That this surge of nationalism was spearheaded by one of the most multiethnic states to ever exist in Europe was, without a doubt, one of the great ironies of history.
    Franz_von_Defregger_Heimkehrender_Tiroler_Landsturm.jpg

    An embellished depiction of the Tyrolean rebels.

    Napoleon's response to this setback was just as fast as his enemies' offensive. The Grande Armée chased the Austrians out of Bavaria, scoring four consecutive victories in as many days, but even so they had little reason to celebrate, since Charles' forces retreated to Austrian soil in good order (6). Far to the south, in Dalmatia, the Ottomans finally made their move in early April, with 30.000 men led by Hurshid Pasha marching from Bosnia towards Spalato. With his forces outnumbered two to one, French general and governor Auguste Marmont avenged his defeat in Bosnia the year before by attacking first and catching Hurshid by surprise, forcing him to fall back all the way to Livno to lick his wounds before he could try again.

    Back in Austria itself, the Austrians and French spent the month of April fighting relatively small battles and skirmishes, each trying to reach Vienna first but facing bad weather and even worse roads. The French won the race, the Austrian capital falling without a fight on April 25. Charles fell back to the north bank of the Danube and waited for the French to cross, despite criticisms stating this decision gave them a chance to rest and get reinforcements, which was exactly what happened.

    Not underestimating his foes anymore, Napoleon ordered the construction of strong pontoon bridges over the various islands on the Danube, before sending his army, now numbering a whooping 175.000 soldiers, across on May 19 (7). An Austrian attempt to stop the crossing near the villages of Aspern and Essling failed after two days of hard fighting, so Charles ordered his forces to retreat and dig in at Wagram. He had just 143.000 men to face some of the finest troops the French Empire had to offer.

    The Battle of Wagram, the largest battle fought in Europe until then, began on May 27 1810, shortly after sunrise. Napoleon deployed his army so that most French troops were facing the Austrian center and left flank, the latter of which was entrenched on an escarpment. His plan was to roll up the enemy left wing, then send his reserves (which made up a significant part of his army's numerical advantage, thus ensuring both sides had numerical parity at the battle's opening stage) for a decisive attack against the center.

    But, yet again, Charles did not cooperate with the French emperor's plans.
    1024px-Myrbach-Austrian_grenadiers_at_Essling.jpg

    Austrian grenadiers storming the village of Essling, a crucial position in the battlefield.

    With his back to the wall, the typically cautious Austrian field marshal spent the days before the battle planning an attack at dawn, with the objective of catching the French off guard. The left and center encountered fierce resistance and, after mounting casualties, were forced to retreat back to their original positions on the escarpment, where they managed to hold the line for the time being. The right wing was in another situation entirely: thanks to the weakness of the French left flank, the soldiers of VI Korps, led by Johann von Klenau, advanced all the way to Essling, far behind the French lines, followed closely by Johann Kollowrat's III Korps. The French army's rear was exposed, and its best line of retreat cut.

    Napoleon could not tolerate such a threat, yet he was also still not ready to send in his reserves just yet, hoping the opportunity for a decisive attack could still materialize. So he ordered marshal Masséna's IV Corps to disengage from its current entanglement with the Austrian center and march on Essling, while a cavalry charge led by marshal Jean-Baptiste Bessères distracted the enemy enough for Masséna's high risk manouver to succeed, at a high price in men. But even though Masséna managed to redeploy his troops without suffering too many casualties, he was still unable to defeat Klenau and Kollowrat's forces on his own, and was pushed back with heavy losses (8).

    Panic began to set in among the French once word of Masséna's failure spread, especially since it was followed by rumors he and Bessières had died in their attacks. As if that weren't enough, marshal Bernadotte's IX Corps, made up of Saxons who wore white uniforms (like the Austrians), were fired upon by friendly troops and fled after heavy casualties, the incident opening a gap on the French center (9). It was now or never for Napoleon, who ordered the construction of a grand battery to keep the Austrian center at bay while all available reserves were sent against III and VI Korps, to clear a path back to the other side of the Danube.

    Charles' exhausted force, itself almost bereft of reserves, slowly inched forward as its enemy's morale wavered. It was at this moment that the Battle of Wagram reached its most brutal stage, as the French and Austrian armies exchanged one hammer blow after another, the dead and wounded forgotten as the men under the tricolor fought with desperate courage to return to friendly soil, while those under the double-headed eagle fought just as hard to prevent exactly that. In the end, despite dogged resistance, Klenau and Kollowrat were forced to abandon their positions, the combined weight of the enemy columns bearing down on them and the French batteries on Lobau island too much for their men to bear. The Grande Armée, battered to a degree even worse than Eylau, crossed the Danube in the late afternoon.
    1024px-Karl_von_Blaas_-_Erzherzog_Karl_von_%C3%96sterreich_in_der_Schlacht_bei_Aspern_-_2744_-_Kunsthistorisches_Museum.jpg

    Wagram's aftermath, as painted by an artist in the late 19th century.

    And thus, after more than thirteen hours filled with screams, gunshots, hooves and cannonades, the Battle of Wagram finally came to an end. 55.000 Frenchmen were dead, wounded or captured, compared to 33.000 Austrians. The ghosts of Ulm, Austerlitz, Rivoli, Marengo and so many other Austrian defeats were dead and buried now, avenged by a victory as bloody as it was decisive.

    Wagram's consequences made the Capitulation at Regensburg look like flash in the pan. Tensions in Germany, already on the rise since the latter event, led to an uprising in Brunswick, with former duke Frederick William assembling an army of volunteers famous for their black uniforms (10). Prussia, a nervous bystander until the battle, finally declared war on France, backing its words with an invasion of Saxony on June 5 1810. Having undergone a drastic overhaul in every level since 1807, and now financed by British subsidies, it wouldn't take long for the Prussian army to become a force to be reckoned with once more.

    With new enemies emerging from every corner, Napoleon ordered his army, down to around 120.000 men, to retreat to Bavaria, where it could receive reinforcements and fresh conscripts from France. Archduke Charles was welcomed with such euphoria in Vienna an observer could think the war was over, and, before his departure, he was finally joined by Hurshid Pasha, who kicked the French out of Dalmatia in mid May - Marmont's army was among the reinforcements Napoleon requested in the days before Wagram. The Ottoman soldiers stuck out like sore thumbs among their allies, thanks to their fezzes and red uniforms, yet this would make their upcoming deeds all the easier to remember.

    Back in Bavaria, Napoleon and his marshals planned their next moves. Though on the backfoot on every front now, the French Empire could still call hundreds of thousands of new troops into service, even if most of them were conscripts, and they still outnumbered the allies (now called the Fifth Coalition) as a whole. After days of deliberation, the emperor and his subordinates agreed on their upcoming campaign's main priorities: stabilize the situation in Spain by any means necessary, fight Austria to a standstill and knock Prussia out of the war before its people could be fully mobilized.

    It was a sound plan, yet it was about to be upended by someone Napoleon could never expect.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) IOTL Austria declared war in 1809, and what happened next was, well, history. The Austrian army wasn't fully reformed yet, and Vienna's finances could withstand only a few months of war AFAIK.

    (2) I first mentioned these guys in Part 8, and the next update will feature them getting some action.

    (3) These restrictions, and the letter, are OTL.

    (4) IOTL the Austrian high command couldn't agree on a strategy, and this delayed their preparations for a month. Since they have a little more time to prepare for war here, they sort out their differences in time not to hinder the army's operations.

    (5) IOTL the Austrian pincer was hindered by bad weather, allowing III Corps to escape.

    (6) I felt this part is a bit forced since this is basically what happened IOTL, but in the end I think it's the most plausible turn of events. The Grande Armée is still very powerful here, after all, since there's no catastrophe in Russia.

    (7) When Napoleon first reached the Danube in 1809, he immediately crossed it instead of waiting for reinforcements, thus leading to his defeat at Aspern-Essling. Since he and his army have already suffered their fair share of defeats ITTL, he plays it safe.

    (8) IOTL Kollowrat stayed behind for some reason, and Klenau advanced all by himself. When Masséna's corps showed up, he was forced to fall back.

    (9) A similar incident happened IOTL, on the first day of the battle.

    (10) These guys are OTL.

    Last but definitely not least, here's a video by Epic History TV about the Battle of Wagram, so you guys can have an idea of where each unit/corps is.

     
    Last edited:
    Part 11: ... and the Snake
  • ------------------
    Part 11: ... and the Snake


    The weeks that followed the Battle of Wagram saw much activity in every theater of the War of the Fifth Coalition, except, ironically, for the one where the battle itself took place. In Spain, the Supreme Junta and its British allies launched a huge, three-pronged offensive to liberate Madrid, with armies from the west (led by Wellesley), the south (led by Castaños) and the east (led by Palafox) advancing simultaneously, numbering some 160.000 soldiers in total. With only around 70.000 men to spare in central Spain after tens of thousands of troops were sent to Bavaria to help bolster his younger brother's beleaguered army, Joseph Bonaparte had no choice but to attempt to defeat his enemies in detail.

    He focused on Palafox, who commanded the smallest army (around 50.000 troops), but French operations at this stage were so compromised by spies, enemy sympathizers and guerrillas (who intercepted couriers whenever they had the chance) that the allies were aware of his plans well in advance. A defensive commander through and through, Palafox ordered his men to build earthworks near Guadalajara, behind the Henares river, and waited for Joseph's troops to arrive. The Battle of Guadalajara was fought in June 4, and although the Spanish were forced to retreat to minimize casualties, Wellesley and Castaños liberated Madrid before Joseph could help the garrison he left there, to its inhabitants' euphoria. Thus, the puppet king was forced to retreat to Valladolid, and from there to Burgos. The final blow was near.

    In Germany, Prussia quickly overran most of Saxony (much of its army had taken part in Wagram, suffering significant casualties as a result), forcing king Frederick Augustus to flee, while the Black Brunswickers raised hell in the northwest, giving Jérôme Bonaparte, king of Westphalia, a run for his money. In the Danube theater, where the most important French and Coalition forces were located (Napoleon and Archduke Charles were both there, after all), weeks went by without either side doing anything. This was, of course, understandable: Napoleon needed time to replenish the losses his army suffered, while the Austrians, though victorious, were exhausted, and needed time to get their own affairs in order.

    Unfortunately for Vienna, the French Empire's administrative apparatus was still more sophisticated than the one it possessed, despite all the reforms made after Austerlitz, and Napoleon still had considerable reserves of manpower to call upon, even if his pool of available veterans shrank with every defeat. The result of this was that his army got back into fighting shape before Charles', allowing him to retake the initiative in late June. The French emperor's strategy from this moment on was straightforward: while he and the bulk of his troops (whose numbers had swollen to roughly 190.000 men) would stay in Bavaria to pin the Austrians to the Danube front, a smaller army of 87.000 men led by marshal Desaix and Eugène de Beauharnais (viceroy of Italy and Napoleon's adopted son) advanced into Saxony to kick the Prussians out.

    1184px-Vernet-Battle_of_Hanau.jpg

    The Battle of Chemnitz.

    Though the Prussian army had grown considerably since the declaration of war, thanks to its new system of conscription and the steady arrival of thousands of volunteers from other German states, it was still outnumbered (79.000 to 87.000) by the French force sent to deal with them. Even so, Prussian commander Gebhard von Blücher couldn't afford to abandon his gains in Saxony without a fight, so he crossed swords with Desaix and Beauharnais in the outskirts of Chemnitz, on July 3. He was met with a disaster: his fresh troops, though brave, were no match for the Grande Armée, and they soon fell into a headlong retreat to Leipzig - only narrowly escaping capture in the process - and from there to Potsdam, just outside Berlin.

    The debacle in the north forced Charles to act against his better judgement - he had "only" 172.000 soldiers at his disposal - and he ordered his troops, stationed in Linz, to march into Bavaria on mid July. The stage was being set for another decisive battle, and Napoleon advanced to face the archduke near Osterhofen. He had good reasons to be confident: besides having the bigger army, the future battlefield was far more favorable to his men than Wagram, whose escarpment multiplied the Austrian left flank's strength to a significant degree.

    It was then, right as he was about to fight the battle that could turn his fortunes around, that Napoleon received news of yet another catastrophe.

    Joachim Murat, king of Naples and a man who stood by his side since the 13 Vendémiaire coup attempt, the event that started Napoleon's rise to power, had betrayed him.

    621px-Equestrian_portrait_of_Joachim_Murat.jpg

    Joachim Murat, with his usual extravagance.

    Murat, the second most senior marshal in the French Empire and husband of Napoleon's youngest sister Caroline, had served as monarch of Naples since 1808, after its previous ruler, Joseph Bonaparte, was put on the Spanish throne thanks to the Abdications of Bayonne. At first he used the perks of his new position to satisfy his vanity, building one of the most ostentatious courts of its day and equipping the troops under his command with uniforms every bit as luxurious as his own. His open avarice, however, disguised a genuine interest in managing Neapolitan affairs, to a degree far beyond what his brother-in-law wished for him to do. His purpose, in Napoleon's eyes, was to serve as an nothing more than an obedient vassal, sending tribute and soldiers whenever Paris needed either, and enforcing the Continental System.

    Under Murat's rule, the various reforms begun by Joseph were enforced for good, earning him the respect from most of his subjects, save perhaps for the most diehard of Bourbon loyalists. The old law system was replaced by one modeled after the Napoleonic Code, old taxes repealed, agricultural estates owned by nobles or the Church broken up and the brigandage that plagued southern Italy was brought under a degree of control. His military reform consisted of more than just giving new uniforms to the soldiers, increasing the army's size through conscription (his most unpopular policy by far) and strengthening its artillery wing, which was almost nonexistent before. Predictably, he also refused to take part in the Continental System, sparing Naples from the pain of a self-imposed blockade and further straining relations with his brother-in-law back in Paris.

    With all this in mind, it was beyond predictable that Murat, urged by Caroline and Charles Maurice de Talleyrand (Napoleon's former foreign minister, who resigned his post in protest against his interference in Spanish politics (1)) began secret talks with the Coalition as soon as he received news of the Capitulation at Regensburg. These talks intensified after the Battle of Wagram, and by late June he was making the last preparations before sending his army, now numbering around 36.000 men, north. Everything suddenly ground to a halt after the Prussian debacle at Chemnitz and Blücher's retreat to Potsdam, as he had no intention of risking everything for the sake of a losing side.

    But the Coalition was beyond desperate at this point, and so they made him an offer he couldn't refuse: besides their original terms of recognizing his rule of Naples, they'd award him the throne of Sicily, then occupied by the Bourbon king Ferdinand III (2). This, combined with Caroline and Talleyrand's warnings there was a strong chance Napoleon was already aware of his treasonous correspondence, finally spurred Murat into action, and he ordered his army forward on July 18. With Italy almost bereft of French troops, the Neapolitan advance into the peninsula was practically unopposed, and by the time of the Battle of Osterhofen, fought on July 29, Murat's vanguard was at Piacenza, poised to invade Lombardy.

    Joachim_Murat_entering_Florence%2C_19_January_1801.jpg

    Murat in the streets of Florence.

    Forced to detach some 20.000 men from his main army to build a defensive line in Italy before it was too late, Napoleon's numerical advantage over Charles' army vanished. The Battle of Osterhofen was every bit as bloody as Wagram, with the infantry hammering each other into exhaustion, hussars and dragoons whirling around one another in the flanks, and the deafening roars of the artillery drowning everything out. It was here that the Ottoman contingent under Hurshid Pasha made its first major contribution to the Coalition cause: though kept in the reserve at first, they were sent to plug a gap that appeared in the Austrian line, halting a French attack column in its tracks.

    Despite everything, however, Osterhofen was an indecisive affair: though his army had suffered fewer casualties, Charles was forced to call off a pursuit upon learning that Desaix had abandoned his Prussian offensive and was marching toward Bohemia. Local Austrian general Karl von Schwarzenberg was entrenched in the Sudetes, a steep mountain range and an excellent defensive position, but there was no guarantee he could win against one of France's most talented marshals with the forces he had in hand, so he called for help from his commander-in-chief.

    And so everything in Germany ground to a halt once more as Prussia licked its wounds, Napoleon did the same and Desaix stopped his march after receiving news of Charles coming his way. It wasn't until mid August that things got back in motion once more, as the Coalition's most ignored member, Sweden, landed, with British support, a force of 30.000 men in Greifswald, which went on to reinforce the beleaguered Prussian army. The main theatre of action shifted from Bavaria to Saxony, as France and the Coalition steadily concentrated the bulk of their forces there for another great battle.

    Things also stagnated in Italy, as Murat's attempt to secure a bridgehead north of the Po river was defeated by Eugène de Beauharnais at Guardamiglio. Eugène did not have enough men to capitalize on his victory, and the stalemate between the two lasted until September, when an Austrian army of 25.000 men, led by Heinrich von Bellegarde, invaded Venetia and routed a much smaller French force at Treviso.

    In Spain, meanwhile, Joseph Bonaparte's position was hopeless, and the last French army of note in the country was destroyed in Logroño on August 28, as it attempted to escape through a bridge over the Ebro river. With their homeland now fully liberated from an enemy whose military was once seen as invincible, the Supreme Junta voted to dissolve itself and convene the Cortes, Spain's traditional parliament, on September 9 (3). While the Cortes started their work on what would eventually become the Spanish constitution, the military and its British allies crossed the Pyrenees, laying siege to Bayonne and Perpignan. Southern France would be wide open to invasion if either city fell, yet Napoleon needed all the troops and marshals he could spare for the upcoming showdown in Saxony, so he entrusted the relief of the southern cities to an old friend who had proved to have a respectable level of skill as an independent commander: Auguste de Marmont, general of division and former governor of Dalmatia (4).

    Grasping at the chance to finally get his hands on a marshal's baton, Marmont departed Germany with a corps of 20.000 men with all due haste, his force growing as various small garrisons, conscripts and, eventually, the remnants of the armies sent to Spain added up to it. By the time he reached the Pyrenees, in mid September, his army more than doubled in size, reaching a total of 50.000 soldiers. Meanwhile, the Anglo-Spanish offensive had stalled in the face of fierce French resistance, with regular sorties from the troops who made up the garrisons of Bayonne and Perpignan undermining the besiegers' morale. Marmont first moved against the force assaulting the former position, judging it to be the more dangerous of the two due to the proven talent of its commander, Arthur Wellesley, and the superior quality and training of British troops in general, compared to their Spanish counterparts.

    1044px-The_Sortie_from_Bayonne%2C_at_3_in_the_Morning%2C_on_the_14th_April_1814_-_Fonds_Ancely_-_B315556101_A_HEATH_012.jpg

    The Battle of Bayonne.

    Stuck between Marmont's relief army and the Bayonne garrison, then subjected to a coordinated attack from both directions, the British fled after suffering heavy casualties, abandoning most of their heavy guns and not stopping their retreat until they were back in Spanish territory. Marmont decided against pursuing his defeated enemy, turning his attention to Perpignan, besieged by a Spanish army led José de Palafox, whose reputation by this point was nothing short of legendary. Not wanting to suffer Wellesley's fate, he ordered a retreat back to Catalonia, but Marmont pursued him anyway and forced a battle in Figueres, where his troops mauled their opposition to an extent that ensured there would be no incursions through the eastern Pyrenees for the time being.

    Marmont had little time to rest on his laurels, however, as Napoleon summoned him back north to help deal with the consequences of what became known as the Battle of the Nations, where, after weeks of manouvering, 277.000 Frenchmen fought a Coalition army made up of 283.000 soldiers from four countries (Austria, Prussia, Sweden and the Ottoman Empire) and countless nationalities (Turks, Hungarians, Germans, Swedes, Poles, Czechs...) at Lützen. The great clash, which started in October 2 1810 and didn't end until October 5, concentrated the pièce de résistance of the French military and that of the Fifth Coalition, both sides knowing this was the encounter that would decide the outcome of the war. More than 400.000 rounds of artillery ammunition were fired, and the dead were so great in number some corpses weren't buried until 1811.

    The Battle of Lützen was a calamitous defeat for the Grande Armée, which was unable to break the Coalition no matter how hard it tried. Eager to avenge the humiliation he suffered at Chemnitz, Prussian general Gebhard von Blücher, who was given command of the Coalition army's right wing (made up mostly of his countrymen and Swedish soldiers), launched a series of ferocious hammer blows that came close to buckling the French left flank, forcing Napoleon to send most of his reserves there and ruining his plans for a decisive attack. The center and right wing of the Coalition army, made up of Austrian and Ottoman troops, first stood their ground, then inched their way forward under a hailstorm of bullets and cannonballs.

    1024px-Napoleon.Wagram.jpg

    The Battle of Lützen, as seen from the French side.

    The fact the allies, who suffered at least 50.000 casualties after three days of almost nonstop fighting (the French lost around 76.000), were too tired to pursue his beaten army provided little comfort for Napoleon, whose retreat didn't stop until he reached Mayence, on the left bank of the Rhine. The Confederation of the Rhine, a collection of German states that served as a buffer separating France from Austria and Prussia, ceased to exist, its members surrendering to the Coalition or, worse, switching sides and contributing to their war effort.

    More bad news came from Italy, as a joint Austro-Neapolitan offensive finally forced Eugène to abandon Milan. The viceroy made a desperate attempt to defend Piedmont at Alessandria, but his defeat there was so complete he had no choice but to flee beyond the Alps. Upon entering Turin in triumph, Joachim Murat and his Austrian allies soon began preparations to lay siege to Nice, and a Royal Navy squadron was dispatched to assist them.

    It was then, as France was about to be invaded from multiple directions, that Austrian foreign minister Klemens von Metternich extended Napoleon an olive branch: keep his throne and his country's "natural borders" in exchange for relinquishing any ambitions to restore his sphere of influence in Italy and Germany (5).

    Napoleon refused.

    The war would continue.


    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) Talleyrand began to silently work against Napoleon as soon as the Peninsular War started. During the Congress of Erfurt, for example, he advised tsar Alexander to resist Napoleon's attempt to marry a Romanov princess.

    (2) This is probably the most implausible part of the update, since it involves an Ancien Régime style monarchy being thrown under the bus by its "siblings". To say nothing of Britain, who'd probably like an independent Sicily since it'd be a de facto protectorate of theirs.


    (3) IOTL the Supreme Central Junta dissolved in January 1810, a few months after a disastrous defeat at Ocaña, which opened the way for the French invasion of Andalusia and thus the fall of Seville. I figured the Junta would still dissolve itself at some point ITTL, even if later, once the French are kicked out of Spain for good and its immediate purpose is fulfilled.

    (4) I've been watching a bit too much Epic History TV lately, and decided Marmont is an underrated historical character who was unable to live up to his potential before his fall into ignominy.

    (5) The OTL Frankfurt proposals.
     
    Part 12: One Final Effort
  • ------------------
    Part 12: One Final Effort


    Napoleon's refusal of Metternich's terms, which were easily the best peace he could get given the circumstances he was in, came as a shock to most of Europe and his subjects. The French Empire was on the retreat everywhere: its client states in Italy and Germany were either nonexistent or at war against their former overlord, while Spain went from an ally of questionable usefulness to an outright enemy, one whose fight for freedom led to the death of countless irreplaceable veterans of the Grande Armée, along with one of his best marshals. The beliefs of Talleyrand and other secret (and not-so-secret) enemies of the emperor were vindicated - he was clearly beyond reason, and Europe wouldn't be at peace until he was removed from the picture for good, and that meant marching into Paris itself.

    Still, despite their determination to end the War of the Fifth Coalition once and for all, it took months for the allies to begin their invasion of France. Their own armies had suffered terribly, to say nothing of the horrors their civilian populations went through, and the arrival of winter wreaked havoc on their logistics. While Napoleon used this respite to call up whatever conscripts he could still get his hands on, his wife, empress consort Catherine Pavlovna, wrote a flurry of letters to tsar Alexander I, pleading for her brother to intervene in the war, if not for Napoleon's sake, then for her young son, born on November 18 1809 (1). Though the Russian emperor's love of his sister (who was known among her family members as "Katya", a nickname that would also be used by her in-laws) is well known and documented, his commitment to stay neutral was as adamant as ever (2).

    "Your husband rejected peace every time it was offered to him," one of his replies said. "Only he can stop this war."

    Napoleon was alone.

    1107px-Jean-Louis-Ernest_Meissonier-Campagne_de_France.jpg

    Napoleon and his marshals during their last campaign.

    One January 2 1811, three months after the Battle of Lützen, two Coalition armies, numbering a whooping 350.000 men in total (120.000 Prussians and Swedes were led by Gebhard von Blücher, while the remaining 230.000 Austrians and Turks were led by Archduke Charles), crossed the Rhine at Mayence and Strasbourg. Hopelessly outnumbered, the French forces before them could only fall back, and so the main obstacle to allies' advance was logistics: with winter in full swing, France's countryside was full of snow, while its roads were reduced to rivers of mud. Because of this, it took the Coalition one entire month to reach Champagne, the flat region east of Paris, where the war's outcome would be decided.

    With only 150.000 men (many of whom being teenagers who barely knew how to use their muskets) to face the behemoth lumbering its way to his capital, and hearing news the allies were dispersed after their grueling march, Napoleon struck first, engaging a Prussian corps at Brienne, the town where he began his military studies, on January 29 (3). Though he was victorious in the battle that ensued, the emperor was unable to score a decisive blow, and he was forced to retreat after the Coalition concentrated its troops and defeated his now outnumbered army at La Rothière three days later. Believing their enemy would fall back to Paris, Blücher and Charles agreed to converge upon the French capital from different directions - the former would march north, along the Marne river, while the latter would follow the Seine. This strategy would also reduce the strain on their logistics, which were nothing short of atrocious.

    Napoleon, who could not ignore the golden opportunity the allied strategy presented to him, halted his retreat as soon as he heard of it. Not only were the two Coalition armies far away from each other, but they were marching at different speeds: Blücher, an aggressive gambler by nature, rushed forward, stringing his army out in the process, while Charles was more worried with keeping his forces concentrated and ready for battle, an approach that reduced his progress to a crawl. Leaving two corps behind to delay the Austrian advance as much as possible, the French emperor swung north.

    The campaign that ensued was perhaps the most shocking of all the Napoleonic Wars. Though exhausted, hungry and full of conscripts, the Grande Armée advanced like lightning through the snow and mud, pouncing upon a small Prussian corps of 5.000 troops and destroying it at Champaubert, on February 10 1811. The French then turned west and engaged a larger force at Montmirail, putting it to flight as Prussian commander Ludwig von Yorck realized he was facing a much stronger foe than anticipated. He and his 37.000 men made a dash for Château-Thierry, whose bridge over the Marne was their last hope of escape, but a corps commanded by marshal Jacques Macdonald got there first. After a brief but desperate fight, Yorck was forced to surrender (4).
    1174px-The_battle_of_Montmirail_in_1814_%281822%29%2C_by_Horace_Vernet.jpg

    The Battle of Montmirail.

    Caught off guard by the speed and suddenness of Napoleon's attacks, Blücher attempted to retake the initiative by attacking newly made marshal Marmont's isolated corps, left behind to keep an eye on his movements while the emperor chased Yorck to Château-Thierry, at Vauchamps. This was precisely what Napoleon wanted him to do, and so he marched to his marshal's aid in a bid to finish off what was left of the Prussian army. Blücher attempted to disengage before it was too late, but his retreat was a disaster - Marmont's pursuit was implacable, and whatever semblance of order the Prussian ranks still had vanished when Blücher, who was in the thick of the action to boost his men's morale, was captured by French cuirassiers (5).

    The Six Days' Campaign, as this string of victories became known, threw the Coalition's plan to end the war out of the window - the Prussian forces on French soil weren't just neutralized or decapitated, they had virtually ceased to exist. Charles, whose army of 230.000 men was just a few dozen kilometers away from Paris at this point, ordered an immediate retreat, before the Grande Armée cut his lines of communication. Though they still had a considerable advantage in numbers, the allied soldiers' morale, already sapped by the sluggish pace of their march, sank like a rock: the ghost of Austerlitz and Jena was back, right when it seemed the French Empire, and the Revolution it embodied, was on the brink of destruction.

    Not wanting the man who defeated him at Wagram, Osterhofen and Lützen to withdraw in good order for obvious reasons, Napoleon gave his men little time to rest before ordering them to march east, to cut the last allied army's lines of communication to Vienna and sow as much chaos in their ranks as possible (6). The sheer size of Charles' army became a drawback, with muddy roads already packed with supply wagons jamming as Austrian and Ottoman soldiers traveled through those same roads in their retreat. The archduke planned to fall back to Nancy and either force a decisive battle there or wait until the British, Spanish and Neapolitans invaded the south, which would force the French to stretch their already meager forces even further.

    But Napoleon's troops reached Nancy first, their smaller numbers and knowledge of the best paths to take making them far more nimble than the lumbering beast that the allied army turned into. By late February, it seemed all hell was about to break loose: the French peasantry, largely apathetic and wanting peace at almost any price before the Six Days' Campaign, was becoming increasingly hostile to the invaders, who often stole everything they had in their desperation to stay warm and fed, forming small bands that, while not as formidable as the guerrillas that terrorized the Grande Armée in Spain, were yet another factor the Coalition forces had to worry about, to say nothing of the hit-and-run attacks staged by small French corps against their vanguard and rear.

    Thus, by the time Archduke Charles finally came within sight of Nancy, on March 1, the number of soldiers he could count on had been whittled down to 190.000 men, which, while still a formidable force on paper, was now more interested in survival than anything else. To prevent the allies' escape, Napoleon concentrated all his available forces (themselves worn down to some 130.000 fighting troops) and dug in. His plan, a stark departure from the aggressive tactics he was accustomed to, was to force the allies to hurl themselves against his fortifications (located on the right bank of the river Meurthe) until they were exhausted, then take advantage of it.
    1082px-Jahrhundertausstellung_1906_KatNr._0865.jpg

    The Battle of Nancy, as seen from the allied camp.
    If Lützen illustrated how the French army and that of the Fifth Coalition performed at their best, the Battle of Nancy, fought on March 2 1811, displayed how they were at their most desperate. Exhausted and starved after what felt like an eternity of marching and fighting, the rank and file of both sides wanted nothing more than an end to the fighting, a sentiment reflected in the addresses Charles and Napoleon gave to their troops shortly before the clash began: both promised this would be the last battle they would have to fight.

    The Battle of Nancy began, as usual, with an artillery duel, which was where the allies' numerical advantage was most prominent: they had more than twice as many cannons as the French, even if their heaviest pieces had to be left behind in the mud. It didn't take long for a gap to appear in the French line thanks to the Austrian batteries' incessant bombardment, and Charles ordered his infantry forward as soon as he took notice of it. It was then, at that very moment, that the toll taken by the hunger and fatigue which hounded the Coalition soldiers since their retreat from Champagne became most apparent, as several collapsed after running a few dozen meters or less, while others, pushed by the belief that salvation was just beyond the enemy lines, rushed ahead randomly, blinded by the smoke created by the artillery duel.

    What was supposed to be a charge devolved into a mob, and the allied attack was torn apart by French musket and cannon fire, the few men who reached the enemy earthworks easily repulsed. Some of Napoleon's more impetuous commanders argued this was the perfect time for a counterattack, but he refused to order one - his own troops were in shambles, and it is said he himself had to man a cannon at one point in the battle (7). The French sat behind their trenches and redoubts, waiting for the next allied attack.

    This approach gave Charles plenty of time to plan his next move, and the offensive that ensued was far better organized than the first. The allied musketeers and grenadiers advanced under the cover of their artillery, and they soon reached the French earthworks in large numbers. Fierce hand to hand combat followed, as the combatants used bayonets, swords and musket butts to either fight their way into the enemy defenses (in the allies' case) or drive them out. This was a fight in which attrition would win the day, and Charles had far more men to spare for the meatgrinder than Napoleon did. The Coalition slowly pushed the French out of their earthworks, if at a terrible cost, as the hours went by, and this only emboldened their troops, desperate as they were to find a place where they could rest and eat safely.

    Then a stray cannonball hit the allied gunpowder magazine, and the explosion it caused was so large and powerful even the men in the trenches could see, hear and feel it. Panic spread among the Coalition troops as rumors spread that Charles and their other commanders were dead, or, worse, what few supplies they had left turned to ash. Even so, the French were so worn down and bloodied at this point that they only managed to fight their enemies to a standstill, rather than push them out of their redoubts completely.

    Fighting subsided with the arrival of nightfall. While the soldiers of both sides took what little sleep they could, their respective commanders debated furiously on what to do when the sun rose again. Charles' nerve was thouroughly broken by this point, and he was supposedly willing to accept almost any terms Napoleon offered him. The French emperor and his marshals, unaware of his plight, were divided between those who wanted to fight one more day and those who argued for an orderly withdrawal, fearing another day's fighting would shatter what little was left of the Grande Armée for good.
    TyphusdeMayence1814.jpg

    Cold, hungry and typhus-stricken French soldiers after the Battle of Nancy.

    The latter party won out, and when the surviving Coalition soldiers woke up on the dawn of March 3, they were greeted by the sight of their enemies marching away from the battlefield, their banners vanishing over the horizon. Spontaneous celebrations broke out, and they intensified once the troops got word that Charles intended to abandon France altogether. Whether the archduke actually wanted this to happen is, utlimately, irrelevant - had he ordered his men to stay, it's probable they would've replied with a mutiny. The allied army, worn down to "just" 150.000 men in fighting shape after the horrors of Nancy, continued its retreat east, not stopping until it reached Kehl, on the German side of the Rhine.

    But even while the people of Paris shouted Vive l'Empereur with a fervor unseen since Napoleon's coronation more than seven years before, the emperor himself had little reason to celebrate. His army was in no shape to take the war back to German soil, and because of this it was only a matter of time before Charles invaded France a second time, with an army larger and better supplied than anything Napoleon could hope to match.

    The news coming from the south were even worse, as Joachim Murat finally launched his long-awaited assault on Nice, whose defenders, demoralized after the defeats suffered by Eugène de Beauharnais in Italy, surrendered after only a short bombardment. The Rhône valley was now wide open to an Austro-Neapolitan attack, and as if that wasn't enough, French agents in the Pyrenees issued reports stating the British and Spanish were ready to go on the offensive once more, having recovered from the defeats suffered at the hands of then general Marmont last September.

    Napoleon's back was still against the wall, but his star recovered some of it's prior shine - he inflicted upon the Austrians their worst defeat since Austerlitz, while Prussia was no longer a factor to worry about. Still, his position would only get worse if he kept fighting, and he knew it: all he wanted now was to keep his throne, and spend the rest of his life with his son and the wife he learned to love so much (8).

    And so it was that the man who spent most of his adulthood at war finally sued for peace.

    ------------------
    Note:

    (1) Needless to say, this isn't OTL's Nappy II.

    (2) Alexander doesn't take this stance just because of spite against Napoleon, but also because of his need to focus on Russia's domestic affairs after its defeat at the hands of the Ottomans.

    (3) When the Sixth Coalition invaded northern France in 1814, Napoleon had only 70.000 men to counter them IOTL. I think it's plausible for him to have a few more dozen thousand troops available ITTL, since there's no invasion of Russia.

    (4) During the OTL Six Days' Campaign, Yorck and Russian commander Osten-Sacken only barely managed to escape Napoleon's grasp.

    (5) According to the Wikipedia article on Vauchamps, Blücher was almost captured during the retreat.

    (6) Napoleon tried to pull off this strategy IOTL, after he failed to score a decisive victory against Blücher or Schwarzenberg. Unfortunately for him, the allies got word of the shambolic state of Paris' defenses through a captured courier, and they rushed into the French capital.

    (7) This supposedly happened IOTL, during the Battle of Montereau.

    (8) Napoleon had a good relationship with Marie Louise even though she was a Habsburg (and thus a relative of Marie Antoinette), so it's only fair he gets along with Katya as well.
     
    Part 13: The Congress of Frankfurt
  • ------------------
    Part 13: The Congress of Frankfurt


    To say that Napoleon's decision to raise the white flag came as a surprise to the Fifth Coalition was an understatement, as were the terms he asked for - that France be allowed to keep its "natural borders" in exchange for not interfering in any affairs beyond them, a revival of the offer Metternich made him in late 1810, before the invasion of northern France by Archduke Charles and Gebhard von Blücher. Many allied statesmen and generals were, by this point, convinced the French emperor could not be reasoned with but only brought down by force of arms, as were those who, like Talleyrand, schemed against him from behind the scenes, waiting for the perfect moment to strike. Perhaps the "Corsican Ogre" was a man after all, instead of an irrational monster.

    The Coalition fell apart almost as soon as its members learned of Napoleon's offer, since the Austrian Empire, whose army did the lion's share of the bloody work of kicking the French out of Germany and convinced Naples to do the same in Italy, agreed to suspend all military operations against Paris, much to Britain's ire. Not only did Metternich not want France to be completely defeated - he hoped it could serve as a counterbalance to Russia, since Prussia clearly couldn't be trusted to do so - but the war took an enormous human and financial toll on Vienna, despite the constant stream of British subsidies and logistical aid, and neither he nor emperor Francis had any interest to prolong the bleeding for London's sake (1). Satisfied with his performance and knowing which way the wind was blowing, Naples' Joachim Murat dropped out of the war as well, as did the Spanish Cortes, who wanted to focus their energies on rebuilding their shattered country. Prussia was a non factor, while the Ottomans just wanted the whole thing to end.

    Thus it was that, despite its horror at the idea of Antwerp (long deemed a "pistol pointed at the heart of England") staying under French control, the British government had no choice but to follow its allies and cease hostilities. After almost two decades of nonstop war, Europe was finally at peace. The time had come to divide the continent once more, this time in a "fairer" way, and the place chosen to host the discussions on what that meant was the city of Frankfurt.
    1280px-Frankfurt_Am_Main-H_Worms-Stadtansicht_vom_Muehlberg.jpg

    A steel engraving of Frankfurt dating from 1845.
    Once witness to the coronation of several Holy Roman Emperors, the city became the birthplace of the "Concert of Europe".

    From May 12 1811 until December 18 that same year, Frankfurt's streets were swarmed by diplomats, statesmen and even some monarchs from multiple countries, all of whom brought along vast entourages of courtiers eager to enjoy whatever luxury the city, one of the wealthiest in Germany, could offer. The countries which took part in the Congress, designed to bring about a lasting peace in Europe instead of merely restoring the pre-revolutionary order, were divided in three categories:
    1. The "Five Great Powers" - France, Great Britain, Austria, Prussia and the Ottoman Empire. These were the countries whose participation was deemed of the utmost necessity in bringing about the end of the Napoleonic Wars, and thus enforcing any peace that came afterwards;​
    2. The "lesser powers" - Sweden, Portugal, Spain and Naples. While Spain played a crucial role in setting the stage for the Grande Armée's eventual defeat, it was still an empire in decline, one whose colonies began to break away almost as soon as its war of liberation began;​
    3. Everyone else - Sardinia, the Papal States, Switzerland, the Netherlands, various lesser German states, etc.​
    Often known as the first "modern" peace conference since its participants all came together in a single city instead of just exchanging letters over hundreds of kilometers, the Congress of Frankfurt gave the governments that took part in it a chance to have their voices heard, however small a role they played in the negotiations. While the bulk of the wheeling and dealing was done by the Great Powers, the lesser ones only occasionally allowed to step up officially, the fact everyone was packed so closely together gave the diplomats of the latter group a chance to form new connections and friendships through informal conversations. The gossip that spread as a consequence of people regularly attending various festivities together also meant the talks between the Great Powers' representatives weren't as secret as they might've liked.

    The final agreement of the Congress of Frankfurt stipulated, among various other articles, that:
    • France would be allowed to retain all lands west of the Rhine, though Savoy and Nice were to be returned to the kingdom of Sardinia. This was done at the insistence of the Neapolitan delegation, likely to boost their king's image as a defender of Italian freedom (2);​
    • The Confederation of the Rhine was officially dissolved and replaced by the German Confederation;​
    • The Republic of Ragusa, an Ottoman client state that existed in southern Dalmatia until its conquest by Napoleon in 1808, was restored;​
    • The Capitulations were abolished, giving the Ottoman state full control over its import tariffs;​
    • Lombardy and Venetia were put under the rule of the Austrian Empire;​
    • The territories of the Duchy of Warsaw were given back to Prussia, though it was some nominal autonomy (3);​
    • The same "autonomy" was extended to West Galicia, which remained under Austrian rule;​
    • Joachim Murat's rule of Naples was legitimized, and he was granted the crown of Sicily. The island's last Bourbon king, Ferdinand III, spent his last days in a comfortable exile in Barcelona, dying there on January 4 1825 (4).​
    A new order was born in Europe, one that combined the advances made by the French Revolution with the states that withstood the tide, despite its makers' attempt to keep them separate from one another. The Napoleonic Wars may have come to an end, but the transformations they and the Revolutionary Wars began were far from over.

    ------------------

    Back in Constantinople, the cessation of hostilities with France was both a triumph and a source of great worry for grand vizier Muhammad Ali Pasha. On one hand, the Sublime Porte's participation in the Congress of Frankfurt was an immense diplomatic coup, not just thanks to the gains it made there (the end of the Capitulations and the restoration of Ragusa) but because it showed the Ottoman Empire was still a power to be reckoned with on the international stage, alongisde the likes of Britain and Austria. On the other hand, the end of the war meant Muhammad Ali's great domestic foe, Hurshid Pasha, would return home, and he and his soldiers were given a hero's welcome as they paraded through the streets of the imperial capital. Considering his record as governor of Egypt, his recapture of Mecca from the Saudis and now the bravery he showed during some of the worst battles of the Napoleonic Wars - which was only slightly exaggerated, thank you very much - it seemed the time had come for him to be promoted to the grand vizierate.
    Churchid_Pacha_Seraskier_of_Rhumeli_Commander_of_the_Blockade_of_Missolonghi_-_Friedel_Adam_De_-_1832.jpg

    A portrait of Hurshid Pasha.

    It took Muhammad Ali all of his charisma and influence to convince Selim III not to do exactly that. Instead, Hurshid was appointed to the governorship of the Anatolia Eyalet, one of the only positions which wouldn't be considered an insult for someone of his political stature. Still, while the ever cunning grand vizier bought some time to shore up his position, he was only delaying the inevitable: he and Hurshid would come to blows sooner or later, and the latter used his rising prestige and the resources at his disposal thanks to his new post to form connections in the army and bureaucracy. Worse still for Muhammad Ali was the fact Hurshid was, metaphorically, within spitting distance of Constantinople.

    Years went by, and the seeds of a new coup were slowly but surely sown.

    Tensions in the capital rose to a fever pitch on March 23 1814, when Selim III issued a firman declaring that Ali Pasha of Yanina, one of the Ottoman Empire's last great ayans, was a rebel. The man chosen to carry out his execution and bring his semi-independent state back under the imperial fold was none other than Hurshid Pasha, who was made governor of the Morea Eyalet so as to give him a base from where he could launch a campaign into Epirus and Thessaly (5).


    The high-stakes game of chess between Hurshid and Muhammad Ali was about to reach its turning point.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) Metternich was worried about Russia becoming too powerful IOTL as well, which was why he made the Frankfurt proposals.

    (2) I figured Savoy and Nice are "insignificant" enough for France to hand over if someone pesters them enough, as long as they're allowed to keep their other gains.

    (3) This happened IOTL as well, even though the Coalition's victory over France was far more thorough, with the creation of the Grand Duchy of Posen and Congress Poland. Also, the post Third Partition borders being restored means the inevitable headache Polish nationalism will cause will be handled by Prussia and Austria, rather than mostly Russia.

    (4) This was the promise that swayed Murat to the Coalition's side ITTL, so it's only natural that it'd be kept.

    (5) The task of subduing Ali Pasha was given to Hurshid ITTL as well.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 14: The Spectre of Revolution
  • ------------------
    Part 14: The Spectre of Revolution


    As modern Ottoman historiography began to develop during the second half of the nineteenth century, the dominant interpretation of Selim III's decision to put Hurshid Pasha in charge of the forces meant to subdue Epirus was that this was the sultan's last attempt to curb Muhammad Ali's power, before he lost control of the state to his grand vizier. While this view was convenient in the atmosphere that dominated the Ottoman Empire's politics after the 1848 revolutions, it also runs into the issue that, no matter how much power Muhammad Ali and his relatives had at the height of their prominence, they, much like France's Cardinal Richelieu, were one royal decree away from losing everything. Besides, had Selim really felt so threatened by his grand vizier, he would've had him replaced or even ordered his execution - the fate that befell Suleiman the Magnificent's first prime minister, Pargali Ibrahim.

    Historiographical discussions aside, Hurshid Pasha made preparations to assemble an army almost as soon as he entered the city of Tripolitsa, capital of the Morea Eyalet. This proved to be a harder task than anticipated, since the Peloponnese had been neglected by Constantinople for decades. To make matters worse, the region still carried the scars of the Orlov Revolt, whose outbreak and eventual suppression led to a surge in pillaging and reprisals responsible for tens of thousands of civilian deaths. Finally, the peninsula was plagued by chronic banditry, whose perpetrators (called klephts, in Greek), like their counterparts in Rumelia, took refuge in Morea's mountainous interior. The resistance to the klephts' constant raids was led not by Ottoman troops, but by local, irregular forces called armatoloi, many of whom were former bandits themselves.

    The invasion of Epirus had to wait - Hurshid needed to put his province's affairs in order first, and given Muhammad Ali's influence in the Sublime Porte he couldn't count on help from the capital. He still had kick off the campaign as soon as he could, however, before sultan Selim grew impatient. The governor's solution was to copy what Hadji Mustafa Pasha did in Serbia almost to the letter, and incorporate the Greeks into the New Order by forming a militia which was to be recruited and led by local notables (1). The higher ups in Constantinople reacted with far less surprise than before, not just because the Serbs didn't backstab them during the last Russo-Turkish war, but because the Greeks, even Christian ones, were very well integrated into the Ottoman bureaucracy, as shown by the prominence of the Phanariots.

    But the men Hurshid was dealing with were nothing like the Serb knezes, and he wouldn't learn that until it was far too late.
    Rigas_Feraios_01.jpg

    Rigas Feraios, one of the founders of the Filiki Eteria.

    While some of the newly formed militia's commanders were loyal, or at least passive, others, like Theodoros Kolokotronis, belonged to a secret organization called Filiki Eteria (Society of Friends, in Greek), whose aim to end Ottoman authority over Greece and, if possible, the Balkans altogether. This intention was made clear in the works of Rigas Feraios, one of its founders and most important members: using the Demotic script, he wrote various pamphlets and poems calling for a multiethnic (though mainly Greek) uprising against the Sublime Porte. Once a secretary to Wallachian voivode Alexander Ypsilantis (not to be confused with his grandson, who was also a revolutionary), Feraios moved to Vienna in 1793, acquanted himself with its Greek community and became an editor for the newspaper Efimeris ("Daily").

    It was during his time in the Austrian capital that Feraios' contacts - and infatuation - with the French Revolution deepened. With the success of Napoleon's first Italian campaign, after the battles of Lodi, Arcole and Rivoli, he chose to leave for Venice, where he hoped to meet the man who had seemingly risen out of the ether and delivered defeat after defeat to the Austrian army. He left Austria just in time, as Efimeris was shut down by the autorities due to its revolutionary publications, which included a Greek translation of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, almost immediately after his departure - had he stayed in Austrian territory even a day longer, it's likely he would've been arrested, delivered to the Ottomans and left to rot in a prison cell or worse (2).

    Feraios' stay in Italy was brief, and by 1799 he was in Marseille, where he would spend the rest of his life. His admiration for Napoleon and revolutionary ideas like popular sovereignty and nationalism grew even further, though the Corsican's failure in Egypt and Syria did not go unnoticed to him - nor did the Russian debacle in 1808-1809. These events convinced Feraios and his increasingly numerous allies that the Ottomans were too strong for them to be forced to relinquish their Balkan territories through brute force alone: a different approach was needed, one which required years of careful planning and intrigue. And so the Filiki Eteria was founded on September 14 1811 (3).

    With Marseille as their organization's headquarters, the conspirators took advantage of the end of the Napoleonic Wars to forge connections with philhellenes (admirers of everything Greek) from many European countries, all eager to help them in any way they could, as well as notables from every stripe in Greece itself, from priests to village leaders to armatoloi and klephts. Hurshid Pasha's decision to create a Greek militia in 1814 was a godsend to them, since he unwittingly incorporated many members of the Filiki Eteria into its ranks and, most importantly, its command structure. As the years went by, the revolutionaries slowly gathered new recruits, weapons, intelligence and military training for their upcoming war against the Sublime Porte.
    800px-Marseille_port_c1825.jpg

    As one of Europe's busiest seaports, Marseille was the perfect base of operations for a group like the Filiki Eteria.

    By 1816 Hurshid felt he was finally ready to advance against Epirus, and as he made the final touches to begin his campaign to dispose of Ali Pasha, the members of the Filiki Eteria prepared to launch their long awaited uprising as soon as the governor and his troops left the Peloponnese. 1816 was, perhaps, the best possible year for to kick off a rebellion: global temperatures were unusually low, so much so that 1816 became known as the Year Without a Summer - harvests failed everywhere, and Greece was no exception to that phenomenon. With taxes staying as high as ever despite rampant food shortages, anti-Ottoman sentiment in Greece reached an all time high.

    It was under this context that Hurshid Pasha, trusting the militia to keep the peace, left the Morea for Epirus with an army of 30.000 men in June 7 1816. Many of Ali Pasha's lieutenants, like Omer Vrioni, deserted him, and the Ottomans scattered those who stayed loyal to the rebel governor with ease. Hurshid's scouts reached Yanina's outskirts in August 23, and he promptly ordered his men to begin a siege. This would be a very arduous task: much like Osman Pazvantoglu in Vidin and Jazzar Pasha in Acre, Ali Pasha spared no expense when it came to improving his capital's defenses, which dated to Byzantine times and were thoroughly modernized during his rule. The besiegers' logistics were also precarious, since Epirus' mountainous terrain meant their supply lines were vulnerable to attacks by bandits and guerrillas.

    It was at this moment, when Hurshid Pasha was too busy dealing with Yanina's fortifications to focus his attention on anything else, that the Filiki Eteria made their move. The rebellion began on June 19 1816, when a force of 2.000 Maniots led by Petros Mavromichalis advanced upon the city of Kalamata, on the southern end of the Peloponnese, and took it with no resistance. Other revolutionary cells sprung into action as soon as they learned of this, and thousands of militiamen who were until then ostensibly loyal to the sultan mutinied all over Greece, lowering the crescent and raising a rainbow of new flags over their barracks. City after city fell to the revolutionaries, the suddenness of their action catching the Ottoman authorities completely by surprise.

    By July, the only city in the Morea Eyalet that remained under Ottoman control was the provincial capital of Tripolitsa, where the mutineers and other revolutionaries had to retreat after a confusing battle in the streets (4). The garrison had little reason to celebrate their victory, however, since they were promptly put under siege - the only silver lining about their position was that the rebels in the area, led by Theodoros Kolokotronis, had little artillery, so there was a chance help could come if they resisted for long enough. Said hope would become increasingly remote as time went by, since more revolts broke out in central Greece, Thessaly and many islands in the Aegean, while smaller disturbances were reported as far north as Salonica. In Attica, the surviving Ottoman forces retreated to the Acropolis of Athens, abandoning the city to the rebels.
    800px-Zografos-Makriyannis_19_Poliorkia_ton_Athinon.jpg

    A depiction of the siege of the Acropolis, one of the last Ottoman strongholds in southern Greece.

    The Filiki Eteria's patience had paid off, and after their successes the revolutionary leaders convened in Argos to form a provisional government and discuss what strategies to be employed from now on. They also needed all the help they could get, and fast - it was only a matter of time before the Sublime Porte launched its inevitable reply.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) I figured this was plausible, given the success of Hadji Mustafa Pasha's experiment ITTL.

    (2) This was Feraios' fate IOTL. He was arrested in Trieste, handed to the Ottomans and executed.

    (3) IOTL the Filiki Eteria was founded in Odessa, in September 1814. I figured having it be founded earlier would be a plausible consequence of Feraios' survival and France's hostile relations with the Ottoman Empire making it a magnet for Greeks displeased with Constantinople's rule of their homeland.

    (4) IOTL the Ottomans held some coastal fortresses in the Peloponnese for a while - Patras, Navarino, etc. The rebels have some third columns in those places ITTL thanks to Hurshid Pasha's decision to create a Greek militia, so that doesn't happen.
     
    Part 15: Papers and Muskets
  • ------------------
    Part 15: Papers and Muskets


    With the memory of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars still very fresh in the minds of Europe and the Western world in general, word of the initial success of the Filiki Eteria's uprising in spread like wildfire almost as soon as it began. People from all political alignments got their hands on as many news of the events unfolding in Greece as they could, some reacting to the information they received with excitement and others with mounting dread. None were happier than the philhellenes, whose infatuation with Ancient Greece made them unconditional allies to the rebel cause, and blinded them to the fact the Greeks they supported weren't the ancient heroes they grew up idealizing (1).

    This was a reality which made itself clearest in the Peloponnese, whose longtime status as a hotbed of anti-Ottoman sentiment made it the rebels' nerve center. Their definition of who was or wasn't a Greek turned out to be very exclusive, as the region's Muslim and Jewish inhabitants found out immediately after the war's outbreak - at Navarino, one of the cities whose Ottoman garrison fought the hardest before capitulating, the rebel victory was followed by a massacre of its non Christian population, the few survivors escaping by sea while most were killed on the shore (2). Albanians were also subjected to attacks, due to decades of ethnic tensions between them and the Greeks: the forces which suppressed the Orlov Revolt in the 1770s were made up primarily of them.

    Atrocities like these were common in virtually every area taken over by the rebels, and the few Ottoman holdouts in southern Greece became magnets for refugees. This put the garrisons in places like Tripolitsa and the Acropolis under even more strain, since they had to deal with more and more mouths to feed with every day that went by. The inhabitants of the rest of the empire reacted to the news they received with fury, and they took out their anger on their Greek neighbors. Almost every Ottoman city with a noteworthy Greek community saw some kind of pogrom against them, the perpetrators using the massacres of Muslims in Greece as an excuse to settle old scores or engage in looting.

    1821_atrocities_Constantinople.jpg

    Rioters attacking Phanar, a neighborhood home to many of Constantinople's Greeks.

    The severity of the persecution varied with the authorities' willingness to suppress it: in Salonica, for example, the local governor took advantage of the situation to begin a brutal crackdown of the Greeks under his jurisdiction, executing hundreds of people and confiscating the properties of many others without bothering to investigate how guilty they were of aiding the rebel cause. In Constantinople, meanwhile, the rioting was only kept from escalating into an all out massacre because of the intervention of the imperial army, which publicly executed dozens of looters and built gallows all over the city as a warning against any further unrest (3). Desperate to spare his people from further repression, the ecumenical patriarch, Cyril VI, issued a lengthy proclamation excommunicating everyone who rebelled against the sultan's rule, decrying them as "godless agitators" who, though masquerading as pious Christians for the time being, would eventually turn against everything the Orthodox Church held dear (4).

    Cyril's proclamation, together with the massacres of civilians committed by rebel and Ottoman forces, became the subject of a fierce propaganda war just as critical as the one fought on the ground. Those who supported the Sublime Porte used the patriarch's words as proof that the rebels were nothing more than a collection of radicals and bandits, while the people who supported their cause argued Cyril's message was written under duress and thus worthless. Most countries' governments stayed neutral for the time being, not recognizing the Greek provisional government but also not stopping their citizens from aiding it in any way they could, Austria being the main exception due to its good relationship with the Sublime Porte. Only Haiti, whose rulers saw the Greeks as a kindred people due to how their own country acquired its independence, recognized the rebel government outright (5).

    On the military front, the Ottomans' consternation with how quickly the uprising spread went away, the higher ups in Constantinople realizing the situation was far from irreversible. While the rebels had momentum on their side for the moment, the amount of manpower and money available to them was nothing compared to the resources the Sublime Porte could summon if it so desired. And they already had a sizable force nearby: Hurshid Pasha's 30.000 men, currently busy besieging Yanina. He was reluctant to disengage, however - he had spent too much time and money on this campaign to abandon it right when he had Ali Pasha's back to the wall.

    Still, he did authorize the detachment of 8.000 troops from his army, which was, at least on paper, more than enough to vanquish most rebel forces. Led by Omer Vrioni, this contingent marched eastward, towards Thessaly, recapturing Trikala and many smaller settlements before reaching Larissa on July 6. After a few days of rest and waiting for reinforcements that increased the number of men under his command to 10.000 after their arrival, Vrioni's army moved south, with the objective of relieving the Acropolis and Tripolitsa. Unfortunately, his ruthless approach to any form of dissent from the Greek peasantry drove the locals straight into the arms of the rebels (6), and by the time the Ottomans reached the city of Lamia, on the edge of the territory still under their control, the revolutionaries were well aware of their plans and how to counter them.

    Vrioni's march ground to a halt on July 20, as his scouts reported the presence of 3.000 rebel soldiers entrenched at Amfikleia. Led by Athanasios Diakos, a former klepht, the Greeks had ample time to fortify their position with redoubts and trenches, thanks to help from the very peasants Vrioni sought to terrify into submission. To make matters worse for the Ottomans, they left most of their artillery at Lamia so as to march at a faster pace, so blasting the rebels out of their earthworks wasn't an option. Fearing the revolutionaries would slip away in the time it would take for his cannons to arrive, Vrioni ordered a series of frontal assaults that accomplished nothing, since his men were met again and again with a hail of bullets from the rebel positions long before they could return fire. Having squandered hundreds of lives with nothing to show for it, Vrioni finally ordered his army to withdraw to Lamia, where they would rest, get their artillery and try again.

    757px-Zografos-Makriyannis_12_Battles_at_Karpenisi_and_Kaliakouda.jpg

    The Battle of Amfikleia.

    Diakos had no intention of letting that happen, and he ordered an attack right as the Ottoman troops were about to begin their retreat. What was supposed to be an orderly withdrawal turned into a rout, and when the ragged remnants of the imperial army reached the safety of Lamia, it was clear they were in no shape to engage in any operations for a very long time. The first pitched battle of the war between the Ottoman Empire and the Filiki Eteria, the Battle of Amfikleia was a disaster for the former, who suffered at least 4.000 casualties while the rebels, despite being outnumbered by more than three to one, lost just 237 men. This was an immense victory for the revolutionary cause, and it bought critical time for them to consolidate their gains.

    Down south, in the Peloponnese, news of the victory at Amfikleia convinced Theodoros Kolokotronis to maintain his efforts to tighten up the siege of Tripolitsa, which by this point was still more of a loose blockade. Fortified bases were set up at multiple strategic locations in the Morean capital's outskirts to fight any attempt by the Ottoman garrison to sally from their defenses in search of supplies, and now Kolokotronis sought to increase the pressure on the defenders by setting up a new strongpoint at Silimna, just west of Tripolitsa itself. This was a major risk, since Silimna was significantly closer to the Ottoman forces than the other rebels strongpoints, and thus more vulnerable to attack. The old Greek general gambled that his enemies, surely demoralized after getting word of the disaster that engulfed Omer Vrioni's attempt to relieve them, wouldn't attack before Silimna's defenses were completed.


    He was wrong, as he found out on August 2. The commander of Tripolitsa's garrison, Kâhya Mustafa Bey, knew he had to keep the rebels at bay whenever possible if he was to have any hope of rescue, so he ordered his 4.000 soldiers to attack as soon as he learned of what was going on at Silimna. With only 2.500 troops at his disposal, Kolokotronis tried to hold his position until help arrived, but his men, though not lacking in courage, did not have the earthworks their compatriots used to great effect at Amfikleia, and so they were overwhelmed after hours of hard fighting. Kolokotronis himself was badly wounded and only barely escaped capture, while any Greeks unfortunate enough to be taken prisoner were impaled on Mustafa's orders as punishment for the massacre of Navarino.

    Emboldened by this victory, and believing the revolutionary command structure to be in disarray due to Kolokotronis' temporary incapacitation, Kâhya Mustafa struck again, this time at Valtetsi, on August 7. The rebels there were in a much more formidable position this time, being on top of a hill and surrounded by rocky slopes that made the Ottoman cavalry useless. These natural defenses were reinforced with three redoubts, but unlike Vrioni at Amflikeia, Kâhya Mustafa could count on five cannons to support his men on what would clearly be a very bloody battle.

    After a short bombardment, the Ottoman infantry attacked Valtetsi from the north and the south simultaneously, coming under withering fire from the entrenched Greeks before falling back with heavy losses. The second assault was more successful, the troops tasked with taking the southern redoubt charging up the slope and engaging in fierce close quarters fighting with the defenders for control of the earthworks. The attack stalled, but the imperial soldiers held their ground long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide of the battle. The rebel position began to crumble, their casualties piling up at an unsustainable rate, and it was only the timely arrival of some 500 men from a nearby village that gave them an opening to retreat (7).
    875px-Eug%C3%A8ne_Delacroix_-_Botzaris_Surprises_the_Turkish_Camp_and_Falls_Fatally_Wounded_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

    The storming of the rebel camp at Valtetsi.

    With two swift blows one after the other, Kâhya Mustafa bought valuable time for Tripolitsa and restored Ottoman morale in the aftermath of the Battle of Amfikleia. For all the glory earned by him and his men, however, they could not end the siege of the Morean capital all by themselves: while the rebels could receive additional troops from other fronts and foreign volunteers, the Ottomans, surrounded by a hostile countryside, could not. The fact Tripolitsa was the only place in the Peloponnese still under the Sublime Porte's control complicated matters further, since it meant the Ottoman navy had no place where it could easily land troops behind most rebel armies - they'd need to force their way through Boeotia and Attica.

    But this approach would have to wait until next year to be implemented, since, as one could expect from the Year Without a Summer, the winter of 1816 came in force earlier than usual - the first heavy snowfall was reported in early September, and soon enough most mountain passes in Greece became too hazardous to be crossed. The mettle of the defenders of Tripolitsa and the Acropolis would be put through the ultimate test.

    As would that of Hurshid Pasha's men, still slowly chipping away at Yanina's defenses.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) As Lord Byron found out after he set foot in Missolonghi.

    (2) This happened IOTL.

    (3) IOTL the authorities not only let the rioters run wild, but they executed dozens of prominent Greeks, including the ecumenical patriarch.

    (4) Gregory V, patriarch during the opening stages of the OTL Greek War of Independence, condemned the rebels as well, but Ottoman sultan Mahmud II had him executed anyway. Predictably, this act sparked outrage throughout Europe, and was a huge propaganda coup for the Greek cause.

    (5) Haiti was the first country to recognize Greece's independence IOTL.

    (6) The Ottoman military had a knack for killing and enslaving people indiscriminately in the Greek War of Independence, and I doubt the extra discipline from a successful implementation of the Nizam-i Cedid would change things that much. Plus, many Ottoman soldiers and commanders are Albanians, and they're pissed.

    (7) Valtetsi was a stinging defeat for the Ottomans IOTL. Butterflies and a successful reform of the army means Kâra Mustafa Pasha has better troops at his disposal, rather than a bunch of irregulars.
     
    Map: Europe after the Congress of Frankfurt
  • drawing-1.jpg

    So heres the map of Europe post Franfurkt congress.

    Austria: Ignore the Hungary as it still doesnt have autonomy, but otherwise i believe i got the map right.
    Prussia: I added Rhur/Whestphalia region to Prussia besides the the Polish parts.
    British: Still in union with Hannover
    Italy: I believe map is mostly right .
    Ottomans: Serbia still has autonomy (but it's mostly local and doesn't make them semi independent state like in otl) and Moldova and Walachia are sperate Ottoman vassals. North Afrian states are still vassals but under Ottomans. Ragusa is there as Ottoman Vassal.
    Sweden: has Finland, but also small part of Swedish Pomerania in Prussia it had otl.
    Denmark: Norway is still in personal union with Denmark i believe because due to Russia not getting Finland Sweden doesn't get Norway as compensation.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 16: Carrots, Sticks and Daggers
  • ------------------
    Part 16: Carrots, Sticks and Daggers


    Though the Ottoman and rebel armies stayed put during the winter of 1816-1817, neither side wanting to risk marching through the mountain chains that dominated Greece's terrain while they were full of snow, the naval front saw plenty of activity. Unincumbered by the hurdles faced by their land counterparts, vessels flying the crescent and the myriad battle flags of the Greek rebellion manouvered and clashed all over the Aegean Sea, the gulf in the number of hulls and guns between them even more glaring than the one between the armies. While the Ottoman navy could count on a variety of true warships of all sizes, from mighty three decked ships of the line to smaller corvettes and brigs, the rebels had a mishmash of merchant ships donated to them by wealthy Greek traders and foreign philhellenes (1).

    But although their vessels were unsuited for conventional warfare, the rebels had an abundance of experienced sailors due to their homeland's strong naval tradition, which dated from Antiquity. Because of this, and the abundance of potential hiding spots for their ships thanks to the abundance of islands, gulfs and other noteworthy geographic features dotting the Aegean Sea, they were able to wage the naval equivalent of guerrilla warfare through the use of fireships. The Ottoman navy, meanwhile, lacked experience (the naval theater of the Russo-Turkish War of 1808-1809 was fought mostly by the British) and, as a consequence of not being reformed as thoroughly as the army, had major issues regarding the competence of many of its officers.

    1075px-%CE%9A%CF%89%CE%BD%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B1%CE%BD%CF%84%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%82_%CE%92%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%AC%CE%BA%CE%B7%CF%82_-_%CE%A4%CE%BF_%CE%BA%CE%AC%CF%88%CE%B9%CE%BC%CE%BF_%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%82_%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%85%CF%81%CE%BA%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE%CF%82_%CF%86%CF%81%CE%B5%CE%B3%CE%AC%CF%84%CE%B1%CF%82.jpg

    A rebel fireship striking an Ottoman frigate.

    The battle that showed everyone the weakness the Sublime Porte's naval arm was fought off the coast of the island of Salamis, in the Saronic Gulf, on December 18 1817. That day, an Ottoman convoy of 43 ships carrying troops and supplies meant to break the siege of the Acropolis was scattered by a much smaller Greek fleet of 27 vessels. Several transports ran aground in their panicked attempt to get away from the rebel fireships, the food, gunpowder and munitions meant for the Acropolis' defenders falling into the hands of the besiegers. Having watched the whole disaster unfold from their vantage point 150 meters above sea level, and knowing this was their last chance of being saved, the Acropolis' garrison surrendered a few hours later.

    The Battle of Salamis was an immense victory for the revolutionary cause, not least because of its symbolism, and the fall of the Acropolis a welcome distraction from their ongoing failure to take Tripolitsa. Beneath all the public celebrations in Argos, however, tensions simmered beneath the surface. The Greek rebellion's leaders were a motley collection of merchants, landowners, intellectuals and warlords united only by their mutual hatred of the Sublime Porte and the wish to create an independent Greece - what said Greece would look like and who would govern it was something that dominated the agenda of Rigas Feraios, the man given the unenviable task of being the provisional government's leader, almost as much as managing the war against Constantinople (2).

    Though respected by many thanks to his role in founding the Filiki Eteria, Feraios' admiration of France and use of Western clothing (a logical consequence of him living there for almost twenty years) earned him the distrust of the Greek military leaders, such as Petros Mavromichalis, Athanasios Diakos and Theodoros Kolokotronis. This distrust worsened due to fierce regional divisions between the revolutionaries (who were, in general, split between those who were born in the Aegean Islands, central Greece and the Peloponnese), as well as disputes over money and administrative posts. With the onset of winter suspending almost all land operations against the Ottomans for the time being, the generals were free to engage in all sorts of intrigue.

    It didn't take long before a civil war broke out, with Kolokotronis forcing the legislature to dismiss the provisional government on January 4 1817. Feraios' supporters fled Argos, set up a new government in Corinth, and two weeks of fighting ensued before an agreement was secured (3). Peace had returned to the revolutionary camp, but Kolokotronis wouldn't be there to see it - he was murdered by an angry Argive soldier on January 7, just three days after his coup (4).
    Kolokotronis_Theodore.JPG

    As one of the few rebel leaders with genuine military experience, Kolokotronis' assassination was a major setback for them.

    As the rebels fought among themselves, Hurshid Pasha finally captured Yanina, his men storming its castle after almost six months of siege and executing Ali Pasha. Sending the ayan's severed head to Constantinople as proof of his success (5), Hurshid spent the rest of winter deliberating on how to bring the revolutionaries to heel once and for all. He began to exchange letters with Odysseas Androutsos, a Greek commander based in Attica who had fallen out with the provisional government and now sought to defect to the Sublime Porte's side in exchange for an amnesty. Androutsos received a firman guaranteeing just that after a few weeks of correspondence, and he promptly snuck out of Athens by ship. He soon found himself in Larissa, where he began to advise Hurshid on the best methods to bring Greece back under the sultan's sway (6).

    The strategy the Ottoman high command came up with during the winter was a two pronged attack against the territories controlled by the rebels, so as to force them to divide their troops. Hurshid would strike from the east, leading 27.000 men into Boeotia, march over the Isthmus of Corinth and relieve Tripolitsa with all due haste. While this went on, another, slightly smaller army of 24.000 soldiers would lay siege to the city of Missolonghi, epicenter of the rebellion in western Greece, then cross the Gulf of Patras under the navy's protection and land on the Peloponnese's western coast. Both armies were made up of battle-hardened veterans from the last wars the empire took part in - no expenses were spared, and no punches would be pulled.

    To the surprise of nobody, grand vizier Muhammad Ali Pasha took an active role in the discussions about the upcoming campaign, seeking to undermine Hurshid's position and bolster that of his son Ibrahim, now a respected figure thanks to his victory over the Saudis at Diriyah. Though he failed to convince Selim III to dismiss Hurshid from his position, he nevertheless secured Ibrahim's appointment as commander of the western army, giving him a precious chance to earn more glory for himself and his family.

    The onset of spring spurred the Ottoman troops into action, the thaw opening the way for what would be their largest military operation in Greece since the last war with Venice a century before. Hurshid Pasha's advance into Boeotia felt less like an attack and more like a flood, since no rebel force dared to fight him and the settlements in the path of his army surrendered in droves. The lack of resistance to his march, combined with the advice given to him by Odysseas Androutsos (now one of his top lieutenants and an invaluable liaison between him and the Greek communities), made Hurshid an exceptionally benevolent general by Ottoman standards, granting pardon after pardon so long as the people requesting them surrendered peacefully.
    683px-Odysseus_Tritzo_Also_called_Ulysses_Governor_-General_of_Eastern_Greece_-_Friedel_Adam_De_-_1830.jpg

    Having begun his military career as a member of Ali Pasha's army, Odysseas Androutsos switched sides twice: first to the Filiki Eteria, then the sultan.
    Despite fighting Turks, Albanians and fellow Greeks over the course of his life, he is still celebrated as a hero by all three peoples.

    His soldiers recaptured Corinth, again without firing a shot, on March 27 1817. After summoning a war council to iron out the last details of his army's next moves, Hurshid Pasha made preparations for his army to enter the Peloponnese and break the siege of Tripolitsa once and for all. They couldn't reach its intended destination soon enough: though Tripolitsa's resistance was nothing short of extraordinary at this point, the ravages brought about by nine months of siege reduced the city's defenders to a fraction of their original strength. Those still fit to fight survived off horse meat, while the citizens and refugees ate rats and dogs. Had it not been for the rebels' infighting and Kolokotronis' murder, it's likely Tripolitsa would've fallen during the winter.

    Hurshid's army entered the Argolis on April 2, and it was from here onward that they finally encountered some resistance. Although the rebel government (or what was left of it after their civil war) hurriedly evacuated Argos without a fight, its citadel was still manned by a garrison of some 700 troops led by Demetrios Ypsilantis. He and his men fought tenaciously for ten days straight, and while their fate was sealed the moment the fighting began (the odds against them were too great), they delayed the Ottoman advance long enough for guerrillas to start attacking their supply lines, taking advantage of the defiles that connected the army to its main logistical base at Corinth, while other groups burned crops and destroyed water wells. With no hope of fighting Hurshid's soldiers head on, the rebels' only hope of victory was to make their lives so hellish they would have no choice but to leave.

    But their efforts were all for nought, since the Ottomans captured the port of Nafplio soon after the fall of Argos. This allowed them to be resupplied by sea rather than land, greatly diminishing the logistical burden of keeping almost thirty thousand men well fed, clothed and with enough ammunition. The path to Tripolitsa was open, and the siege was finally brought to an end on April 22. The army paraded through Tripolitsa's streets in triumph, Hurshid and his officers leading the way.

    The situation in Aetolia couldn't be more different.
    Zografos-Makriyannis_15_Messologiou_Boissonas.jpg

    A depiction of the siege of Missolonghi.

    As one of the first major cities outside the Peloponnese to join the Greek rebellion, and owing to its strategic location on the mouth of the Gulf of Patras, continued control of Missolonghi was of the utmost importance if the rebels were to succeed in their dream of creating an independent Greece. The city's already strong natural defenses (marshy ground on its landward side and a lagoon that protected it from naval attacks) were joined by a network of trenches and ramparts as elaborate as the rebel government could afford. Missolonghi's proximity to the Ionian Islands also made it a hotspot for philhellenes, many of whom veterans of the Napoleonic Wars, who shared knowledge of the various sieges they themselves went through to the garrison.

    To say this made Missolonghi a tough nut to crack was an understatement, as Ibrahim Pasha found out. Upon approaching its outskirts on March 15, he ordered his troops to build a mound of earth and rubble to provide a vantage point for the artillery to rain down fire on the city's defenders. Said mound was blown sky high by a mine a few days before its completion, killing hundreds of Ottoman soldiers and forcing Ibrahim to change tactics. The besiegers tried to give the rebels a taste of their own medicine by blowing up a mine beneath their fortifications on March 29, but they were repulsed before they could force their way into the city. With the navy unable to blockade Missolonghi due to the constant threat of rebel fireships, it became clear the siege would be a lengthy affair, one whose developments would be watched by all of Europe.

    After a few more days of inconclusive clashes, a new mound was built by the Ottomans on April 7, and this time they kept it safe from Greek sappers. The besiegers moved as many heavy guns as they could to it, after which they subjected Missolonghi to a nonstop barrage of cannon and mortar fire: as many as 8.000 cannonballs and mortar shells were fired in just three days, obliterating entire neighborhoods in the process. The bombardment was, supposedly, so intense the fires and explosions it caused could be seen from the island of Kefalonia, several dozen kilometers away. Whether an exaggeration or not, stories like this should give an idea of how hellish conditions were for the defenders, who, despite launching one sortie after another, failed to put a stop to their city's gradual and deliberate destruction.

    But despite the overwhelming, choking smell of blood, sweat, gunpowder and ash, the garrison kept repulsing assault after assault for weeks, any breaches in their defenses plugged and then fixed with the help of those who couldn't fight in the front lines. Rebel casualties were high, but so were the Ottomans': Missolonghi's marshy surroundings were fertile ground for all sorts of diseases, a problem exacerbated by terrible sanitary conditions in their camps. Thousands of imperial soldiers fell sick, further decreasing the strength of their assaults, each failure hurting their morale further.

    It wasn't until news of the fall of Argos and the relief of Tripolitsa reached the combatants that the situation began to turn around in the besiegers' favor. The rebel garrison, realizing their cause was hopeless in the long term now that the heartland of their revolution was under attack, shifted their focus from holding Missolonghi no matter what to evacuating as many civilians as possible by ship while they still could (7). The Ottomans, meanwhile, were reinforced with the arrival of new artillery pieces detached from Hurshid Pasha's army, as well as, supposedly, a message written by Hurshid himself saying Ibrahim needed these guns far more than he did - an immense humiliation to the grand vizier's son.

    Whether the story in question is true is irrelevant. What is relevant is that, with the rebels making preparations for a final stand and the Ottomans' reinforcements, the latter finally secured a foothold in Missolonghi's defenses on April 30. Even then, it took two more days of fighting for them to break into the city, and it wasn't until May 5 that the last rebel forces, some 250 men, were killed - by suicide rather than enemy action, since they found it preferable to blow themselves up with their gunpowder magazine rather than be captured. After one and a half months of siege, Missolonghi and its surroundings were finally silent. The city, once a thriving seaport, was now nothing more than a pile of ash and rubble.

    With the civilians having been evacuated to the Ionian Islands and nothing worth looting left, Ibrahim and his men took out their frustration on the corpses of their enemies, many of which were decomposing for weeks. A tower housing the skulls of almost 1.000 rebel soldiers was built on Ibrahim's orders, the grim structure intended to instill fear into the hearts of anyone who thought of rebelling against the Sublime Porte. In reality, all it did was inspire resentment against the Ottoman state, not just among the locals, but many foreigners (8).
    Skull_Tower_1863.jpg

    During its years of existence, the Skull Tower was seen as the physical embodiment of Ottoman oppression.
    Its mere presence poisoned relations between Constantinople and its Greek subjects for years to come.

    The succession of disasters that befell the rebels in continental Greece affected their performance in the Aegean theater, despite the weakness of the Ottoman navy being well known after the Battle of Salamis. Greek communities still under Ottoman rule got cold feet at the idea of joining the rebellion when its impending failure was visible to all. The best example of this was the invasion of Chios, where a group of several hundred revolutionaries from Samos tried to take over the island in question in late April. The locals chose to join forces with the Ottoman garrison rather than their fellow Greeks, chasing the rebels back into their ships (9). Some rebel naval squadrons, knowing an independent Greece was no longer plausible, became pirates, attacking merchant ships and vessels carrying pilgrims making the Hajj. This, more so than the defeat at Salamis, was an intolerable insult to the Sublime Porte's naval capabilities, since it struck at one of the pillars of its legitimacy among its Muslim inhabitants.

    Back in the mainland, the surrender of Athens and the rest of Attica in early May meant the rebels no longer had any noteworthy footholds outside the Peloponnese. With the conventional war all but over, it was time for the most brutal, yet ironically the least documented, stage of the Greek rebellion: its final suppression. The last rebel armies still standing fled to the mountains and became guerrilla bands, too nimble to be caught by conventional means. Unable to catch their enemy in the open and fight a decisive battle, Hurshid and Ibrahim had to think a way to force the rebels out of their hiding spots.

    The solution the two commanders came up with was as barbaric as it was effective: since they couldn't catch the guerrillas directly, they'd starve them out by burning every single square centimeter of arable land within the rebels' reach. No amnesty was even considered for these last bitter enders and the people who had the misfortune of living close to them (10). The fact the lowlands were to be spared was little consolation for them - most of the Peloponnese was made up of mountain chains. From June until October 1817, a story repeated itself all over the peninsula: Ottoman raiding parties, each a few hundred strong, sallied out from the cities under their control (Patras, Tripolitsa, Argos, etc) and laid waste to every village they found, their sole reason being the fact said villages could be used as bases for the rebels. Harvests were burned, wells broken, granaries plundered, farm animals carried away or slaughtered on the spot.

    As for the inhabitants of those villages, the lucky ones fled or were deported to either the lowlands or the Ionian Islands. More were killed or enslaved by the raiders, and more still simply starved to death after being robbed of all the food they had. The total number of people who died in the raids and the subsequent famine is still a mystery, with most estimates ranging from 20 to 70.000 or more: most documents regarding the attacks and the damage they caused were destroyed in the coming decades, making it impossible for an accurate assessment to be made.

    One region the raids hit particularly hard was the Mani Peninsula, on the southernmost tip of the Peloponnese. Well known for its fiercely protected autonomy and its status as a refuge for klephts and other anti-Ottoman dissidents, Mani's subjugation was seen as a matter of the utmost priority by Hurshid Pasha. What few documents survived to this day indicate the general sought nothing less than the complete genocide of the Maniot people, a goal he was so intent on carrying out he oversaw many raids personally. And it was that dedication to accomplishing this hideous goal that led to his demise: on September 14 1817, near what is now the village of Karinia, a group of guerrillas ambushed Hurshid and separated him from his men. Though he was rescued, the general had been mortally wounded, and died a few hours later.

    The raids in Mani stopped not long after, but much damage had already been done.
    1025px-Gysis_Nikolaos_After_the_destruction_of_Psara.jpg

    "The exile of the Maniots", a painting depicting a group of Maniots leaving their homeland by sea (11).
    Much like the inhabitants of Missolonghi and other Greeks who suffered due to the war, many Maniots found it safer to start new lives abroad than remain under Ottoman rule.

    The Greek rebellion was finally declared over on October 28 1817. Despite lasting only a little over a year, the war took an enormous human toll in Greece, less because of the pitched battles and more due to all the plundering, famine, riots and massacres. It took on an ethnoreligious character as soon as it began, with Muslims and Jews being targeted by the rebels while Christian Greeks suffered at the hands of their neighbors and the Ottoman authorities.

    Despite having won the war on paper, the Sublime Porte had little reason to celebrate: the mere fact the situation got so bad in the first place made it clear the Ottoman state still had serious flaws, despite the success of the New Order and its reforms. The only person who truly gained something from the whole mess was Muhammad Ali Pasha: with Hurshid out of the way, he no longer had any real challengers for the title of grand vizier, and he was free to work on ensuring Ibrahim succeeded him.

    Liberals throughout Europe were shocked and outraged that their countries' governments did nothing to assist the Greek rebels. Said governments just stood and watched, even as the Ottoman military reduced Missolonghi to rubble, laid waste to many islands in the Aegean Sea (killing and enslaving thousands of people in the process (12)) and turned much of the Peloponnese into ash. They would, eventually, act on those feelings.

    For now, all they could do was gather strength bide their time.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This is OTL. The Greek fireships were so dangerous the Ottomans weren't able to resupply their last holdouts in the Peloponnese by sea.

    (2) IOTL the first guy the Greek rebels chose to lead their nascent state was Alexandros Mavrokordatos. Since Feraios worked as a bureaucrat in Wallachia before he left for Austria, I think he'd be a plausible option to lead the provisional government had he survived.

    (3) The Greeks went through two civil wars IOTL. That the Ottomans still had to call for help from Egypt speaks volumes about how weak their military was at that time.

    (4) Kolokotronis' son was murdered during the second Greek civil war IOTL, so his life was definitely in danger at some point. Add in some extra bitterness due to him failing to take Tripolitsa, and one random guy decides to take matters into his own hands.

    (5) This happened IOTL.

    (6) Androutsos tried to defect to the Ottomans IOTL, but he was caught and executed in Athens.

    (7) According to wikipedia article on the third siege of Missolonghi, the garrison actually evacuated many civilians early on, but they eventually got overconfident and let them come back. With the Egyptian navy capturing the lagoon during the siege's last stage, the civilians had nowhere to run and were subjected to all sorts of atrocities once the city fell.

    (8) A skull tower was built in Nis IOTL due to the First Serbian Uprising. The Ottomans dismantled it later, only for the Serbs to rebuild it once they gained control of Nis.

    (9) Thus averting the Chios massacre.

    (10) The Ottoman forces were pretty trigger happy when it came to massacring civilians IOTL, so they're definitely capable of pulling something like this. As for why they don't employ the approach they used in Boeotia and Attica (amnesties and peaceful surrenders), they don't think it'll work in the Peloponnese due to its longtime tradition of anti-Ottoman sentiment, so they don't bother trying.

    (11) This painting actually depicts survivors of the destruction of Psara.

    (12) While the Chios massacre is the most famous case, there were other atrocities all over the Aegean Sea, such as at Psara and Samothrace.
     
    Part 17: A Beacon of Hope and Fear
  • ------------------
    Part 17: A Beacon of Hope and Fear


    If there was one place in the Americas where the opulence and horror which dominated the colonial era were at their most visible, it would likely be the French colony of Saint-Domingue, located on the western third of the island of Hispaniola. While most societies in the continent were marked by a rigid caste system in which skin color was almost as important as material wealth, nowhere was this division more extreme than in Saint-Domingue: at the top of the social pyramid sat the grands blancs ("great whites"), who, as their name suggested, were an exceedingly small minority of white planters who owned most of the land in the colony and, as a result, held enormous political influence. Below them were the gens de couleur libres (free people of color), many of whom were also wealthy plantation owners (who were, nevertheless, denied several rights and privileges due to their mixed ancestry), and the petits blancs ("little whites"), who served in a variety of jobs, from shopkeepers to small farmers and administrative officials.

    Below these groups, all with their own agendas and internecine rivalries, were the people whose blood greased the wheels of Saint-Domingue's economy: hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of enslaved people, who outnumbered everyone else by a margin of ten to one. It was they who, working from sunrise until sunset, ensured the colony's prosperity by cultivating and harvesting the coffee, indigo and sugar which made it France's crown jewel. It was a job they performed under the worst, most horrific conditions imaginable: deaths among the enslaved were so high, thanks to the sweltering heat and diseases, their owners preferred to work them to death and import new Africans rather than provide even the most basic amenities for them. The lucky ones escaped the plantations and formed maroon communities in the mountains, beyond the authorities' reach, while those who weren't faced a likely short life rife with physical and, in the case of women, sexual abuse.

    This was a society full of tensions which had simmered for decades, and, naturally, news of the outbreak of the French Revolution threw it into flux, with each group doing its best to take advantage of the turmoil that engulfed the metropole. The grands blancs not only sought to maintain their privileges, but also wished an end to the myriad of economic restrictions that shackled Saint-Domingue's economy to France. The free people of color, in the meantime, desired equal rights regardless of race, something they had been agitating for for decades at this point, while the petits blancs, who saw them as economic rivals, wished to prevent that and allied with their fellow whites in order to do so.

    Then, on October 1790, Vincent Ogé, a free person of color and wealthy planter, began a rebellion against the colonial government, which refused to enact a law extending full voting rights to people who belonged to his social class. His uprising was short-lived, however: gathering just 300 followers in the outskirts of the city of Cap-Français, he was forced to flee to the Spanish colony of Santo Domingo, whose authorities handed him to the French. After a short trial, Ogé was sentenced to death and broken on the wheel on February 6 1791, a grisly demise which transformed him into a martyr. As open fighting broke out between the whites, free people of color and the French colonial government (beholden to the whims of an ever turbulent National Assembly back in Paris), the enslaved watched everything from the sidelines.

    Then, on the night of August 21 1791, they finally made their move.
    935px-Incendie_de_la_Plaine_du_Cap._-_Massacre_des_Blancs_par_les_Noirs._FRANCE_MILITAIRE._-_Martinet_del._-_Masson_Sculp_-_33.jpg

    A typical scene of the early stages of the Haitian Revolution: rebel slaves massacring their masters' subordinates and families.

    That night, under the leadership of Dutty Boukman and other prominent figures among them, tens of thousands of slaves rose up in revolt all over the northern half of Saint-Domingue, catching their oppressors, already busy fighting each other, completely by surprise. Armed with machetes and other agricultural tools, the rebels, whose numbers multiplied in a matter of days, destroyed hundreds of plantations and killed at least 4.000 people, most of whom were civilians, within two months. Despite a brutal reaction by the whites and colonial authorities, who committed their own massacres and eventually killed Boukman on November 7 1791, they were unable to stop the rebellion from spreading to the south. The Haitian Revolution had begun.

    To say that the situation in Saint-Domingue became chaotic from that point onward would be the mother of all understatements: French rule over the colony was reduced to some scattered strongholds here and there, while the whites, free people of color and rebel slaves fought brutal battles against one another. It was a scenario that became even more hectic after 1792, since Spain and Great Britain got involved following the outbreak of the War of the First Coalition. Both countries desired Saint- Domingue's riches for themselves, and it didn't take long for them to find allies among the combatants: the British secured the grand blancs' allegiance by promising to restore slavery, while the Spanish promised to recognize the rebellious slaves' freedom as long as they fought for them. France, desperately clinging to what was once its crown jewel by its fingertips, had the support of the free people of color.

    It was a free for all, and the war in Hispaniola devolved into a stalemate - the fighting was just too brutal, and repeated outbreaks of yellow fever wreaked havoc among the combatants, especially the British. Alliances were broken almost as soon as they were made, the situation in the island dependent on battles fought thousands of kilometers away in distant, distant Europe. It was a fickle, treacherous state of affairs, albeit one which could bring great benefits for someone cunning and lucky enough to exploit it.

    That someone was Toussaint Louverture.
    520px-Toussaint_L%27Ouverture.jpg

    Toussaint Louverture, the public face of the Haitian Revolution.

    Despite being born into slavery on May 20 1743, one could argue Toussaint had been a lucky man from the get go: he, along with his siblings, was trained to be a domestic servant in his master's household, which spared him from the grueling, deadly work in the sugarcane fields. He was also clearly given a reasonable degree of education during his youth, as shown by surviving letters of his which reference philosophers like Epictetus and Machiavelli, even if documentary evidence shows he apparently didn't know how to write until somewhat late in his life (1). Manumitted sometime during the 1770s (when he was in his thirties), Toussaint became an overseer in the plantation he was born before becoming a slaveowner himself, owning a small coffee plantation. He was, at least as far as the propaganda goes, almost uniquely adapted to take advantage of the environment created by the revolution: his past as a slave (and lack of European ancestry) tilted him towards the rebel cause, while his knowledge of colonial high society meant he was better suited to negotiate with whites and wealthy people of color than most of his colleagues.

    As with other major leaders of the slave rebellion, Toussaint spent the early years of the war as an ally of Spain, which, from its colony of Santo Domingo, supplied weapons, uniforms and ammunition to the men under his command. They became a force to be reckoned with, disciplined enough to meet their enemies in open battle yet still capable of retreating into the countryside to wage a guerrilla war if necessary. But the Spanish alliance wasn't perfect, not only because said country was losing the war in Europe, but also because it meant the rebels were technically allied with Great Britain, whose intention to restore slavery was, naturally, anathema to them. Sensing the direction the winds were blowing, and with France becoming increasingly favorable towards abolitionism, Toussaint, who was until then a devoted royalist, became a loyal revolutionary in early 1794.

    With the British languishing on the shores, dying in droves from yellow fever, and with the help of Toussaint and lieutenants, many of whom were brave and capable generals in their own right, the French had no trouble reestablishing their control over Saint-Domingue, kicking the Spanish out of their colony in a matter of weeks. Their position became even stronger, at least on paper, following the Peace of Basel, signed in 1795, in which Spain agreed to hand its part of Hispaniola to the French in the future, who eventually uniting the island under their rule. The real winner, however, was Toussaint: he outfoxed or eliminated several potential rivals through his skilled politicking and double dealing, and was now not only a respected general, but also a very wealthy man, with many properties all over Saint-Domingue. He was poised to take the governorship, and that was exactly what he did on August 1797, when he forced Léger-Félicité Sonthonax, the post's occupant at the time, to return to France (2). It was a power grab that raised some eyebrows in Paris, but the Directory had bigger issues to deal with closer to home.

    Though he reaffirmed his loyalty to France, Louverture pursued an independent foreign policy as governor, securing an agreement with Thomas Maitland, commander of the British troops in Saint-Domingue, stipulating their withdrawal in exchange for an amnesty for those who collaborated with them. With that immediate threat dealt with, he dispatched Joseph Bunel, a grand blanc and former planter, to the United States, to help secure a trade agreement between said country and Saint-Domingue. Bunel would later meet with president John Adams, and "Toussaint's Clause", as the proposal became known, was approved by Congress in early 1799. American ships were allowed to land in Dominican ports and trade with the locals, even as the US and France waged an undeclared war against one another.

    590px-Le_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_Toussaint_L%27Ouverture_recevant_le_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_anglais_Thomas_Maitland_le_30_mars_1798_%28cropped%29.jpg

    Maitland meeting with Louverture.

    On the domestic front, Louverture sought to rebuild the Dominican economy, ruined by successive years of war. With the colony's treasury wholly dependent on the export of cash crops, the governor forced the former enslaved back into the plantations they so hated, instituting a system of forced labor whose productivity was secured through the use of the military. Louverture's popularity soured, the benefits given to the former enslaved (such as salaries and the abolition of whipping) not enough to keep them from launching small rebellions every now and then. Still, things began to improve on a macroeconomic level, and Toussaint's good relations with Britain and the US gave him two critical allies in the struggle that was to come, for while the Europeans were pulling back from Saint-Domingue, the governor still had one last adversary to deal with.

    His name was André Rigaud, a free man of color who became Vincent Ogé's unofficial successor as champion of his class' interests. While Toussaint held power in the north, the region in which he was born, Rigaud ruled the south, restoring the region's plantations just like his northern counterpart did, though lacking his foreign connections. It was an unsustainable state of affairs, one which was worsened by a French representative who sowed tensions in an attempt to curb Louverture's power, and the two men and their supporters finally came to blows in June 1799. Their brief but brutal conflict became known as the War of Knives, and, after some initial setbacks, Toussaint scored a complete victory over his rival. This came in no small part thanks to the help of the United States Navy, which blockaded ports controlled by Rigaud's troops and provided fire support to Toussaint's forces whenever possible.

    Now at the height of his power, Toussaint ordered an invasion of Santo Domingo, which was still under Spanish control despite the terms established by the Peace of Basel. His soldiers marched into the colony virtually unopposed, turning their leader, a man who was born a slave, into the undisputed dictator of all of Hispaniola. He had, however, crossed one line too many: he had effectively become the ruler of an independent state, a state another military dictator, a certain Napoleon Bonaparte, sought to put back under French control. A new constitution was elaborated in Paris, one that, by stipulating that French colonies would be subjected to "special laws", opened the way for a potential restoration of slavery in Saint-Domingue. Toussaint responded to this by summoning his own constituent assembly (made up primarily of white planters) in March 1801, and the constitution they created came into force in July 1801. It outlawed all forms of racial discrimination, stipulated that slavery would never return, and, most importantly, declared Toussaint governor for life, with near absolute authority and the right to appoint his successor.

    It was, for all intents and purposes, a declaration of independence.

    800px-Prise_du_Cap_Fran%C3%A7ais_par_l%27Arm%C3%A9e_Fran%C3%A7aise%2C_sous_le_Commandement_du_G%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral_Leclerc%2C_le_15_et_20_Pluviose%2C_An_10_%284-9_F%C3%A9vrier_1802%29_-_d%C3%A9tail.jpg

    French troops landing in Cap-Français.

    France's response came in February 1802, when 30.000 men led by Charles Leclerc, Napoleon's brother-in-law, landed and captured several ports all over Hispaniola without resistance. Toussaint withdrew to the interior, intending to wage a guerrilla war until yellow fever weakened the invaders enough for his troops to strike back. It was a strategy was hampered by dissent and bad communications: while some generals complied with his commands to wage a scorched earth policy, in order to deny the French as many supplies as possible, others either didn't receive or refused to obey them. Leclerc took advantage of this lack of unity by employing a conciliatory approach, promising not to reinstate slavery, while the rebel leaders would maintain their ranks in the French military if they surrendered peacefully. He had no intention of honoring the latter promise, not least because he was under secret orders from Napoleon to deport all black officers from Saint-Domingue the moment they entered his custody.

    Jean-Jacques Dessalines and Henri Christophe, two of Louverture's most respected lieutenants, accepted these terms, prompting their superior to do the same on May 6 1802. Instead of being treated like a retired general, however, he was put under house arrest in one of his estates, while Leclerc attempted to assert his authority as governor and made the necessary preparations to deport him. Isolated pockets of resistance continued to fight on in the countryside, and the same diseases that forced the British to withdraw four years prior began to bite. To make matters worse for the French, news arrived stating that slavery had been reimposed in Guadeloupe, much to the horror of the ex-slaves who, besides forming the backbone of the rebel army, made up the overwhelming majority of the Dominican population.

    Finally, as if that weren't enough, Toussaint was able to escape from the house arrest he was under on May 30, days before his deportation to France was scheduled to take place (3). Christophe and Dessalines defected to his side not long after, and Leclerc's control over Saint-Domingue was restricted to the coast in a matter of months. With the failure of the diplomatic solution, Leclerc concluded the only way France could reestablish control over its rebellious colony was through the complete genocide of its black inhabitants, a goal he intended to accomplish by killing every person over the age of twelve. His successor as commander of the French army, the Vicomte de Rochambeau, took an even more brutal approach, importing thousands of attack dogs from Jamaica and turning his ships' cargo holds into rudimentary gas chambers. All these atrocities did was convince the former slaves and free people of color to leave their old rivalries aside (for the time being, at least) and unite their forces.

    Massacres followed. Whenever the French executed black prisoners, usually by hanging or drowning them, the rebels responded in kind, in one occasion executing the same number of French soldiers under their custody shortly after one such massacre, then putting their severed heads on wooden spikes in plain view of their enemies. This brutal tit-for-tat continued for months on end, and all the while the French position continued to decay, weakened by successive defeats on the battlefield and the inexorable march of yellow fever on their ranks. Things only got worse for the invaders in 1803, when France and Great Britain resumed hostilities, and a Royal Navy squadron was dispatched to blockade the last French holdouts in Saint-Domingue. Surrounded by enemies, beset by disease and cut off from reinforcements, Rochambeau finally capitulated, and his exhausted troops left Cap-Français on December 1 1803.

    Toussaint's soldiers entered the city the next day, and Saint-Domingue was no more. A new country was born, and its founders named it Haiti after the indigenous name for the island it was located. For the last few whites who, despite everything, stayed behind in places like Le Cap and Port-au-Prince, the days that followed must've been nerve-wracking: the war had been long and rife with atrocities, and they were now at the mercy of a group they had looked down upon for centuries.

    But, in spite of the rivers of blood that had already been spilled and the near apocalyptic predictions of many slaveholders and racists abroad, the massacre so many of them feared never came (4). Instead of unleashing his soldiers against the white population, Toussaint asked them to send representatives to form a new constituent assembly, so as to craft a constitution better suited to Haiti's current predicament. They were joined by representatives from the free people of color and the former enslaved, the latter of whom had a plurality of seats, and the assembly convened on February 7 1804. Toussaint opened discussions with a blistering attack on the French Revolution, arguing the republic it created was not only weak, but acted against its supposed ideals by trying to force the people who had more than earned their freedom back into bondage. Haiti, he proclaimed, needed a strong leader, one who could keep the nation united and safe from foreign threats.

    It needed a king.

    haiti 1801.jpg

    A pamphlet celebrating Haiti's new constitution, giving it a near divine aura.

    With this speech, Toussaint's career came full circle: he started as a royalist who fought for Spain, became a republican on France's side, then returned to his roots after independence (5). Republicans like Alexandre Pétion and Jean-Pierre Boyer were horrified, and their accusations that Toussaint intended to become a hereditary monarch were undercut after he declared that not only was such a decision solely in the hands of the constituent assembly, but he would not present himself as a candidate. With his prestige and control of the military, whose presence was a constant whenever the assembly convened, Louverture inevitably got his way: the constitution, promulgated on June 12 1804, stipulated that Haiti would be a monarchy, governed by a king whose powers had almost no restrictions whatsoever, while the legislature would be composed of a National Assembly and a Senate. Once again, all forms of racial discrimination were outlawed.

    True to his word, Toussaint stayed out of the royal election, and the constituent assembly, after a few days of deliberation, chose Henri Christophe, one of his top generals, to become the first king of Haiti. Following Henri's coronation in August 11 1804, Toussaint retired to his estate in Ennery, where he would spend the last years of his life. While his decision to let go of power is portrayed by contemporary and later propaganda as an act of magnanimity worthy of a modern Cincinnatus, it is more likely that Toussaint was just too exhausted to keep governing. He was already in his late forties by the time the Haitian Revolution began, and the stress of the subsequent years of war ruined his health. Case in point, Louverture died in October 5 1807, just three years after his retirement. He was sixty-four years old (6).

    While the worst of the war had passed, things were far from smooth sailing for the newly crowned Henri I. Leclerc's invasion had further devastated the plantations that formed the bedrock of Haiti's economy, and it would take years of rebuilding to get them back up to speed. His election as king wasn't without issue either, since there was a sizable faction in the military which favored Jean-Jacques Dessalines, another prominent general in the Haitian army, and rumors of a coup began to circulate in the streets of Cap-Haitien (formerly Cap-Français) almost as soon as the festivities associated with his coronation died down. Lastly, the republicans, who had many supporters among mixed race Haitians, were opposed to his rule by default.
    535px-Henri_Christophe.jpg

    Henri I of Haiti.

    Fortunately, Henri could count on support from Great Britain, which saw him as an useful ally against France due to the Napoleonic Wars, and the United States, whose ties with Haiti only strengthened following John Adams' reelection in 1800 (7). He also had a big, juicy target he could turn his restless army on: the formerly Spanish colony of Santo Domingo, still under French occupation despite the catastrophe that engulfed their forces on the western side of Hispaniola. Their position there was comparable to a house of cards, however: their troops were small in number, with no hope of receiving reinforcements from France, and the local Spanish colonists were already contemplating rebellion.

    Thus, when king Henri dispatched an army of 25.000 men under general Jean-Baptiste Riché to invade Santo Domingo in February 1805, his advance was virtually unopposed. The Spaniards were brought to their side through promises of fair treatment and economic development (Santo Domingo had long been neglected, even before the French occupation), promises validated by the Haitians' treatment of their own white population back home. More than a few found the idea of being ruled by a black man baffling at best, but even then he was a preferable alternative to the French. It wasn't until the Haitians reached the gates of Santo Domingo city itself that they at last met some sort of resistance, but the odds were so overwhelmingly in their favor the French surrendered after a short siege (8).

    By March 1805 the island of Hispaniola was reunified, this time under Haitian rule, and the long, grueling task of securing its independence could finally begin. It was a journey whose steps would be watched by politicians and intellectuals from all around the world, all of whom with very strong opinions on the subject. For some, Haiti's name would be equated to hope and freedom, while others were terrified by its mere existence.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This is all OTL, at least according to his wikipedia article.

    (2) Funnily enough, Toussaint accused Sonthonax of wanting to massacre Saint-Domingue's white population. A bit ironic, considering what Dessalines would later do.

    (3) This is the big POD of this update. IOTL Toussaint was taken to France and eventually died there, while the leadership of the rebellion fell in the hands of Dessalines.

    (4) A sharp departure from OTL, to say the least.

    (5) Toussaint switched sides whenever it suited him IOTL, though he stayed loyal to his abolitionist principles once he adhered to them. Also, a monarchy does have a plus compared to a presidency for life, in that there's a clear line of succession.

    (6) Toussaint died in 1803 IOTL. I figured it'd be plausible for him to live a few more years if he isn't left to rot in a French prison.

    (7) Long story short, news of the end of the Quasi-War reach the US in enough time to swing the 1800 election in Adams' favor. I'll hopefully write an update focused on the consequences of Adams' reelection in the future, but there's a whole other bunch of stuff I want to handle already.

    (8) Dessalines and Christophe tried to conquer Santo Domingo in 1805 IOTL, but failed. Their forces massacred almost a thousand civilians during their retreat back to Haiti.
     
    Last edited:
    Part 18: An Eagle Reborn
  • ------------------
    Part 18: An Eagle Reborn


    As with almost every European colony in the early 19th century, the Viceroyalty of New Spain could be compared to a cauldron, full of social and economic tensions simmering just beneath the surface. Built on the foundations laid by the Aztec Empire and various other native civilizations conquered by the Spanish, New Spain was one of Madrid's crown jewels in the Americas, together with the Viceroyalty of Peru far to the south. Its wealth and splendor, sustained first and foremost by silver mining, then farming and trade with the Philippines (another Spanish colony), made the colony the object of much dispute not just between Spain and other great powers, but its inhabitants as well. As with other Spanish colonies, New Spain's society was dominated by the peninsulares, Spaniards born in Europe who occupied most of the important administrative posts. Just below them were the criollos, local-born whites with varying degrees of native ancestry who, despite being quite wealthy in some cases, had their interests sidelined in favor of the peninuslares' more often than not.

    In a society where ancestry and skin color were just as important as material wealth to determine one's social status, the further down one went through New Spain's hierarchy, the more likely it would be for said individual to possess more and more indigenous blood flowing in their veins. The middle class, exceedingly small in a society as unequal as this, was made up of poorer whites and mestizos (mixed race people) who served in a variety of professions, from doctors to lawyers to clerks and shopkeepers. Finally, the bottom was occupied by large masses of mestizo and native farmers, the lucky ones among them living and working in communal farms (the ejidos) while those who weren't worked in haciendas (large estates) owned by the criollos and peninsulares.
    511px-Casta_painting_all.jpg

    A painting from the mid 18th century depicting various colonial families, and the names given to each racial category.

    While New Spain was fraught with tensions among its inhabitants, especially between the criollos and the peninsulares, from the get go, the Spanish Crown's actions over the course of the 18th century did much to worsen the situation. The House of Bourbon, which came to power in Madrid after almost two centuries of Habsburg rule, sought to reassert Spain's supremacy over its myriad colonies, as well as crack down on corruption and smuggling (which, in that age, consisted of commerce with any country other than Spain). The Bourbon Reforms, as they became known, crippled the criollos' power while strengthening that of the peninsulares, with the latter being given practically all of the new administrative posts which were created.

    By the early 19th century, the situation had become ever more difficult to tolerate. Spain's involvement in the French Revolutionary Wars, and the Napoleonic Wars after that, led to a succession of tax hikes, spurred by need to fund the Spanish war effort in Europe and protect New Spain's lengthy coast from possible British attacks. Although the incumbent viceroy, José de Iturrigaray, was reasonably popular thanks to the various internal improvements under his watch, as well as his authorization of bullfights on colonial soil, he was powerless (or perhaps not interested, given subsequent events) to stop the circulation of increasingly radical ideas among the criollos. With the United States and later Haiti showing it was possible to set up an independent state in the New World, the only thing left to set off a similar chain of events in New Spain was a spark.

    And the French invasion of Spain provided exactly that.

    News of the Abdications of Bayonne, and the utter mayhem that followed, reached the Americas in a matter of months, and the already fragile political situation gave way to an outright crisis. With the mother country desperately fighting for its independence, the colonies were left to their own devices, unsure of who to answer to now that the rightful king, Ferdinand VII, was under house arrest in a French château. The criollos in the colonies, eager to take advantage of the power vacuum, called for the creation of local juntas, not unlike the ones set up in Spain itself, to administrate the colonies until the Bourbons were restored, while the peninsulares, fearful of any change which could undermine their supremacy, were intransigent defenders of the status quo.

    New Spain was no exception to this phenomenon. Word of the events in Europe reached the colony's shores in mid July 1808, and the local criollos wasted no time in making their voices heard. On July 19 1808, viceroy Iturrigaray received from the cabildo (city council) of Mexico City, dominated by criollo representatives, a proposal to establish a junta, whose purpose would be to govern the colony in king Ferdinand VII's stead until his eventual restoration to the Spanish throne. He acquiesced despite the objections made by the Royal Audiencia of Mexico, New Spain's highest court and a stronghold of the peninsulares, which argued that anything other than complete loyalty to the directives laid out by the junta of Seville (the Supreme Central Junta hadn't been established yet) was an act of rebellion against the crown. Their position was backed by merchants whose fortunes depended on New Spain's economic subjugation to its colonial overlord, the Inquisition, and the archbishop of Mexico, Francisco Javier de Lizana y Beaumont.

    The junta, presided by the viceroy and made up of 82 representatives who belonged to the military, clergy and civil society in general, first convened on August 9. Two criollo members of the Mexico City cabildo, Francisco Primo de Verdad y Ramos and Juan Francisco Azcárate y Lezama, argued that, with the king unable to exercise his power, such responsibility ought to be given to the people of New Spain, who would be represented by the various municipal councils which already existed, along with other institutions (1). Naturally, the peninsulares' delegates balked at this proposal, as did many more moderate and conservative criollos - such a move could easily snowball into outright independence from Spain, which was off the table for everyone except the most radical among their class.
    Juan_Francisco_Azc%C3%A1rate_Lezama.png

    Juan Francisco Azcárate y Lezama, one of the leaders of the criollo party.

    Ultimately, the junta's first meeting accomplished nothing. As August 1808 wore on, the only things the viceregal government could do without sparking controversy were symbolic acts such a public oath of loyalty to Ferdinand VII, which was made on August 13. The situation became even more delicate after the arrival of two commissioners sent by Seville to assess the situation in New Spain, and they wasted no time before scheming with their fellow Europeans against Iturrigaray and the criollos, who were increasingly seen by them as one and the same. To make matters worse for the viceroy, he couldn't count on the loyalty of all of New Spain's intendancies (provinces), either: while México and Veracruz were solidly behind him, the governors of Puebla and Guanajuato, as well as the audiencia of Guadalajara, repudiated the authority of the junta in Mexico City and remained loyal to Spain alone, even if the country in question lacked a centralized government at the moment.

    Further meetings of the junta did nothing except increase the animosity between criollos and peninsulares, with the Audiencia, backed by the Sevillan commissioners, outright accusing Iturrigaray of incompetence on one occasion. The viceroy responded by revoking New Spain's official recognition of the Seville junta as its colonial overlord, stating instead that all Spanish juntas were equal in authority. By September, it was clear it was only a matter of time before open fighting broke out between both sides' partisans. With no compromise in sight, the ideas of Melchor de Talamantes, a Peruvian-born friar who called for the election of a congress to decide New Spain's destiny, rather than a mere provisional junta, became increasingly appealing to the criollo party.

    Finally, the peninsulares decided enough was enough - if the viceroy wasn't willing to repress their adversaries' clearly seditious activities, they'd replace him with someone who was. With the acquiescence of archbishop Lizana and the Sevillans, the peninsulares of Mexico City, led by a prominent landowner and trader named Gabriel de Yermo, began to gather weapons and men to depose Iturrigaray and, after that, begin an all out crackdown against the criollo party. The plotters intended to put their plan in motion on the night of September 15 to 16, when they would gather the forces at their disposal - some 300 men, to be led by Yermo in person - storm the viceregal palace and arrest Iturrigaray before his allies could react.

    Unfortunately for the conspirators, their plot wasn't as secret as they thought. When Yermo and his supporters, believing to be safe under the cover of darkness, assembled and prepared to march towards the viceregal palace, they were met and fired upon by troops loyal to the government. They never stood a chance: caught by surprise, many, including Yermo himself, were killed before they could use their weapons, and several others surrendered to avoid the same fate. As the sun rose over the streets of Mexico City on September 16, viceroy Iturrigaray had full control of the situation, and, after months of relative timidity, finally acted on a decisive manner (2).
    Gabriel_J._de_Yermo.PNG

    Gabriel de Yermo, whose failed coup assured Mexican independence.

    Several prominent peninsulares, including archbishop Lizana and members of the Audiencia, were arrested, and furious mobs ransacked properties owned by them. Word of the events in the capital spread like wildfire, and soon similar bouts of unrest broke out in other major cities, street battles breaking out as local criollos and mestizos saw a chance to finally act on their old grudges against the Europeans. They, meanwhile, took up arms to defend themselves, and local authorities were at a complete loss on what to do and who to obey - bad roads meant information took a long time to spread, and when it did reach its destination it was often either obsolete or distorted by hearsay. Juntas popped up on every corner on a nigh spontaneous manner, formed by peninsulares and criollos alike, all fighting for supremacy over their respective regions (3).

    Surprisingly perhaps, this scenario of utter anarchy was short-lived, especially when compared to the long, horrific wars which took place in other Spanish colonies. The peninsulares' strongholds were scattered and, most importantly, leaderless, while the criollos could count on support from the highest authority in the land. After dispatching a flurry of messages to various cabildos known to be loyal to him (such as the one which governed the critical port of Veracruz), and purging the viceregal army of royalist elements, viceroy Iturrigaray ordered a series of military campaigns against peninsular holdouts. Hopelessly outnumbered and assailed by enemies within and without, most surrendered without a fight - the most serious resistance was offered by New Galicia, an autonomous state centered in Guadalajara, but even it was forced to give up in the face of overwhelming odds.

    Thus, the situation in New Spain was (mostly) resolved by January 1809. No longer hiding his affinity for the criollo party's ideas, José de Iturrigaray, still acting in the name of the Spanish king but now an independent ruler in all but name, issued a decree calling for the election of a congress, as first proposed by Melchor de Talamantes months before. Made up of 107 deputies elected from all over New Spain, this assembly, which became known as the Congress of Anahuac, first convened in Mexico City on March 7 1809 (4). However, it didn't take long for the criollos' joy at finally attaining the power they sought for so long to be replaced by a fierce debate on what to do with that power. With the unifying force provided by the threat of the peninsulares gone for the time being, the Congress' sessions became increasingly heated, with two factions forming: the federalists, who called for a decentralized state and were open to a republic, and the centralists, who, as their name suggested, supported a strong central government and were almost unanimously supportive of a monarchy.

    Before the gridlock could become too severe, however, the government received two news which served as a well timed wake up call.

    First was that Spain had, at long last, established a coherent government (the Supreme Central Junta) capable of communicating with its colonies, even if it couldn't send troops to the Americas yet as a because of the ongoing war with the French. This government, centered in Seville after the fall of Madrid, not only demanded that Iturrigaray relinquish his post, but had already designated a substitute for him: Francisco Javier Venegas, a general who took part in the Battle of Bailén and other, less successful clashes with the Grande Armée. Needless to say, Venegas was arrested the moment he set foot in Veracruz and sent back to Cuba on March 29 1809, an act which served as a de facto declaration of independence, even if the official one would come only months later (5).

    The other news came from the Captaincy General of Guatemala, nominally a part of New Spain, but one so far away from Mexico City's reach it was effectively a different colony altogether. Word of the events further north reached the captaincy's inhabitants in a matter of months, and, despite governor Antonio González Mollinedo y Saravía's best attempts to keep a tight lid on things, local criollos soon began to plot their own rebellions in their respective intendancies (6). News of these developments, combined with the unofficial declaration of war on Spain that was made through Venegas' deportation, convinced many movers and shakers in Mexico City that Guatemala had to be conquered, not just for the sake of military glory, but to deny the Spanish a potential point through which they could launch an invasion of their new (and still unnamed) state's southern territories.

    With all these factors in mind, Iturrigaray didn't need much convincing to call up an army to bring Guatemala under the fold. This army, made up of 24.000 men once fully mustered, was assembled in the city of Tehuantepec, right next to the border of the territory it was meant to invade, and was put under the command of Agustín de Iturbide, an ambitious criollo who benefited from the purge of Spanish officers in the viceregal army (7). After months of planning, further correspondence with their fifth column and gathering supplies, the not-yet-Mexican army entered Guatemala on May 27 1809, scattering all Spanish forces before them. A huge uprising broke out in the intendancy of San Salvador once the conspirators there got word of the invasion, and they swept over most of the province in a matter of days. A similar revolt took place in Nicaragua, its followers taking the cities of León and Granada in quick succession (8).

    Outmatched in every way and attacked from multiple sides, Saravía had no choice but to surrender once Iturbide's troops came within sight Guatemala City on June 19 1809. In a little over than a year, Spain had gone from master of Central and (much of) North America to losing all of its continental territories north of Panama, save for Florida. Needless to say, it wouldn't take long for the consequences of such momentous developments to be felt further south.
    Proclama_de_libertad_%28indep._Centroam%C3%A9rica%29.jpg

    A painting commemorating the uprising in San Salvador.
    José Matías Delgado, one of its main leaders, is in the center.

    The annexation of Central America had immediate, longstanding effects on Mexican politics. The provinces that once belonged to the Captaincy General of Guatemala were allowed to send representatives to the Congress of Anahuac, and since most of these had goals which aligned with planks defended by the federalists (as they did not want to simply exchange one overlord for another), the balance of power in the Congress shifted away from the centralists decisively. This did not mean, however, that they would get their most ambitious goals satisfied: several of them were quite moderate, more willing to negotiate with their nominal adversaries than with their more radical 'colleagues'.

    At long last, after months of back and forth arguing and voting on proposal after proposal, the Congress of Anahuac finished, on October 7 1809, the document it had been elected to create. Known as the Act of Independence of the Mexican Empire, it declared, among other articles, that:
    1. Mexico is an independent nation, free from the rule of Spain and any other government not chosen by its own people;​
    2. Its territory is divided in provinces, which can be further divided if deemed necessary;​
    3. Each province is free to handle its own affairs, though its power is strictly restricted to its own borders;​
    4. Its government is a constitutional monarchy, headed by an emperor;​
    5. With the absence of a current reigning dynasty, the first emperor will be chosen by Congress;​
    6. Governing power is to be divided between three branches: the executive, legislative and judiciary;​
    7. The executive power is to be exercised by the emperor and ministers of state, the legislative by the National Assembly (made up of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate), and the judiciary by the Supreme Court of Justice;​
    8. The emperor has the authority to appoint and demote ministers, as well as veto laws passed by the National Assembly;​
    9. The National Assembly is to be elected every four years, though it can be dissolved earlier through a vote of no confidence;​
    10. The right to vote and be elected is restricted to men 25 years of age or older, and such men also need to meet a minimum income;​
    11. The state religion is the Roman Catholic Church, but other faiths can be practiced in private.​
    In the end, both federalists and centralists achieved their most important goals. The former got the provincial autonomy they so desired, as well as a clear separation of powers, while the latter got their monarchy (which, while not an absolutist one, was still quite powerful) and Catholicism's status as Mexico's official religion, a state of affairs which would secure the Church's properties for decades to come, to the ire of many liberals. When time came for the Congress of Anahuac to decide who would be their new country's first emperor, a few days after the approval of the Act of Independence, only one name was even worth considering: José de Iturrigaray, the viceroy who spearheaded the process that ended Mexico's status as a Spanish colony. Crowned José I on December 17 1809, he was the first monarch to be crowned in the American continent, and, at sixty-seven years of age, also the oldest. His reign was fated to be a short one, and no one knew if his eldest son, also named José, would be able to fill his shoes when the time came (9).

    Last but not least, the Congress voted on what flag for their country to use. Several designs were presented, but, in the end, the flag that won was one which combined elements which represented both the future and the past: a tricolor, not unlike the French one, and an eagle perched atop a cactus, a symbol used by the Aztec Empire of old. It also represented the circumstances in which the Mexican Empire was born, marching towards the future but without forgetting its past.
    1280px-TrigaranteMexico.jpg

    Festivities associated with the coronation of José de Iturrigaray as emperor of Mexico.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This was the main argument used by supporters of independence throughout Spanish America: with the mother country unable to govern its colonies, said colonies had the right to govern themselves.

    (2) This is the big change, since the coup succeeded IOTL. Iturrigaray's substitute as viceroy was Pedro de Garibay, an elderly field marshal who was nothing more than a puppet for the Audiencia. A huge crackdown against prominent criollos ensued, with both Primo de Verdad and Talamantes dying in prison.

    (3) Since they don't control the viceregal government like IOTL, the peninsulares have to fend for themselves.

    (4) A congress with the same name existed IOTL.

    (5) Venegas was viceroy when the Mexican War of Independence began IOTL.

    (6) A large revolt broke out against Spanish rule in modern El Salvador in 1811, but it was repressed IOTL.

    (7) Iturbide rose rapidly through the royalist ranks IOTL, so I figured it'd be plausible for him to lead an army.

    (8) As with the revolt in El Salvador, this uprising was quickly suppressed by the Spanish IOTL.

    (9) Special thanks to @jycee for finding out about Iturrigaray's family: https://gw.geneanet.org/sanchiz?lang=en&n=iturrigaray+arostegui&oc=0&p=jose
     
    Last edited:
    Part 19: Death of an Empire, (Re) Birth of Another
  • ------------------
    Part 19: Death of an Empire, (Re) Birth of Another


    While Napoleon's invasion of Spain is usually seen as the catalyst which started the independence of its colonies, it can be argued that this process began in Argentina almost two years earlier, in June 1806. Since Spain and France were still allies at this point in time, the government of Great Britain attempted to conquer the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata, one of the Spanish Crown's most distant colonies. Bereft of reinforcements from the mother country due to the calamitous defeat suffered by the Spanish navy at the Battle of Trafalgar, the local viceroy, Rafael de Sobremonte, had to make do with the few troops at his disposal, and he, believing the British were planning to attack Montevideo, sent most of those troops to reinforce its defenses. This proved to be a costly mistake, for when the British landed on the outskirts of Buenos Aires on June 25, Sobremonte had no choice but to flee to Córdoba, hundreds of kilometers inland, without a fight.

    Despite their initial victory, however, the invaders' control of Buenos Aires was short lived. The other major cities of the River Plate were still under Spanish control, providing points from which a counterattack could be launched, while in Buenos Aires itself many locals were displeased with the British occupation. One of these people was Martín de Álzaga, a merchant of Basque descent who, like many of his fellow peninsulares, made a fortune through Spain's monopoly of trade with Buenos Aires, a monopoly the British administration had broken. While he and other like-minded people plotted a rebellion against their occupiers, an army of 1.200 men under the command of Santiago de Liniers was assembled in Montevideo, ready to liberate the viceregal capital once preparations were complete. Liniers' troops approached Buenos Aires on August 4 1806, and they, together with Álzaga's forces, slowly retook the city after days of vicious street fighting. The British commander, William Beresford, capitulated on August 14, and his troops were forced to give up their regimental colours - a great stain on their record (1).

    The invaders weren't the only ones humiliated by the campaign's outcome. Rafael de Sobremonte's flight from Buenos Aires was seen as an act of cowardice by the capital's populace, even though he was following a protocol set decades before - indeed, he was actually preparing his own campaign to liberate it, but Liniers got there first. Thus, the porteños (inhabitants of Buenos Aires) decided to demote him from the post of viceroy and install Liniers in his place without waiting for the Spanish Crown's approval, a truly unprecedented action. With the possibility of a second British invasion looming, Liniers' first act as viceroy was to organize and arm a militia of local criollos, the Legión Patricia ("Patricians' Legion"), which would later become the Argentine Army's first regiment. Martín de Álzaga, also hailed a hero, was made mayor of Buenos Aires, and he, together with Liniers, began to strengthen its defenses, ordering the construction of trenches and other fortifications.

    383px-Santiago_de_Liniers.jpg
    Malzaga.png

    Santiago de Liniers and Martín de Álzaga, leaders of the resistance to the British invasions of the River Plate.
    The circumstances surrounding their alliance, and its eventual dissolution, sealed the end of Spanish rule in the region.

    Their worries were well founded: on February 3 1807, a British force several times larger than the one vanquished at Buenos Aires attacked Montevideo, and stormed it before the defenders could get reinforcements. After a few months, during which they consolidated their control over this critical port, the invaders marched against Buenos Aires in early July. Several days of brutal urban fighting ensued, in which the porteño civilians aided their compatriots by doing things such as pouring boiling water and oil on advancing British soldiers from the windows of their homes. In the end, the invaders, weakened by desertions and low morale stemming from their lack of progress, had to not only abort their attempt to capture Buenos Aires, but evacuate Montevideo as well. The people of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata accomplished something truly remarkable: they defeated a powerful foreign army numbering many thousands of men, and they did so without any help from their colonial overlord.

    The first seeds of Argentine independence were sown.

    As time went by, the joy of defeating the British without anyone's help was replaced by an atmosphere of growing unease among Buenos Aires' movers and shakers, as the implications of their feat began to be felt. The criollos, always eager for more autonomy and power (as in other Spanish colonies), now had a battle-hardened military force of their own, while the peninsulares were absolutely terrified of it. The wartime alliance between Liniers and Álzaga cooled, with the criollos rallying behind the former and the peninsulares the latter. It was a a political environment ripe for intrigue, and it became even more so once news of the Dos de Mayo Uprising and the Abdications of Bayonne reached the shores of the Río de la Plata on August 1808.

    These news were especially damaging for Liniers, since he was of French birth (his original name was Jacques de Liniers, before he changed it to his far more famous Spanish name). Despite issuing a statement in which he rejected Joseph Bonaparte's claim to the Spanish crown, similar to other acts done by fellow colonial rulers elsewhere, rumors spread that he was secretly planning otherwise. The governor of Montevideo, Francisco Javier de Elío, publicly challenged Liniers' authority by summoning a junta, without waiting for his approval, on September 21 (2). This development was watched closely by Martín de Álzaga and other prominent peninsulares in Buenos Aires, who, not unlike those in New Spain, sought to do away with Liniers and put someone more pliable to their interests. The criollos, on their part, still saw the viceroy as an ally, but they too were eager to shake up the status quo.

    The situation became even more heated once word of the coup attempt in New Spain, and its consequences for the Europeans there, reached the ears of the porteños. The peninsulares' ongoing conspiracy radicalized - at first they intended to force Liniers to resign to give their takeover a veneer of legality, but now they wished to depose him outright, no matter the consequences (3). Some of the more ambitious criollos, increasingly frustrated with the viceroy's refusal to heed their repeated calls for the election of a junta, were busy plotting as well (4). Only dimly aware of each other's movements, both groups unwittingly picked the same date in which to put their plans in motion: January 1 1809.

    638px-Casa_de_Pe%C3%B1a.jpg

    A group of pro-independence criollos holding a secret meeting.

    The fateful day came, and the peninsulares were the first to act: troops belonging to three regiments loyal to their cause, all made up of Spaniards, converged on Buenos Aires' main square (then called Plaza Victoria, later renamed Plaza de Enero (5)) shortly after sunrise. Once gathered, they advanced upon the fort that served as the viceroy's official residence, overpowering the guards and forcing Liniers to resign at gunpoint. Not long after, the cabildo (city council) of Buenos Aires, a stronghold of Álzaga's allies, issued a statement declaring the post of viceroy was vacant, and claiming to itself the authority to elect a substitute to serve on an interim basis. This news threw the Platine capital's criollos into a panic, and their most radical members, the military forces at their disposal bolstered by moderates fearing the peninsulares' imminent crackdown, launched their own uprising hours earlier than planned.

    The alzaguistas, who expected to spend the rest of the day arresting their opponents and therefore cement their victory without a fight, were completely blindsided by the sudden appearance of the Legión Patricia's battle-hardened veterans, led by Cornelio Saavedra, on the streets. Backed by a substantial part of the populace, enraged by the news of Liniers' overthrow, the Patricios fought their way to the main square and entered the Fort of Buenos Aires, freeing the viceroy before his captors could deport him. The battle had radicalized the situation even further, however, and by the time the guns fell silent the crowds that had gathered on the Plaza Victoria were chanting the same slogan over and over: "¡Junta queremos!" ("We want a junta!" (6)).

    Undoubtedly intimidated by the mob, and warned by Saavedra that any attempt to suppress it would lead to a mutiny, Liniers attempted to salvage whatever political power he could by calling a cabildo abierto (citizens' assembly), which was to convene on January 2. His ultimate intention was to buy time by letting the criollos, still rife with internal divisions, bicker among themselves on what to do while he and his allies came up with a plan to retake control of the situation.

    The cabildo abierto convened on schedule, but it did so under an atmosphere so thick with tension it could be cut with a knife. The crowds from yesterday returned, their frenzied cheers replaced with an anxious silence as they waited for news, while within the cabildo itself armed guards were present in every session, ostensibly to maintain order but really to ensure the criollo party got its way in the negotiations to come. But not even the presence of these metaphorical swords of Damocles was enough for the cabildo's 251 members to reach a consensus on their first day of work: most agreed that the best course of action would be to create a junta, but what said junta would look like was a much thornier subject. The moderates, led by Saavedra and hoping to follow the example set by New Spain, argued a hypothetical junta ought to be presided by Liniers. Another, more radical faction, represented by men such as Mariano Moreno, Manuel Belgrano and Juan José Castelli, replied that the viceroy's very reticence on summoning a junta in the first place proved he could not be trusted with such a vital position - he had to be removed as well. A third group, made up of more conservative criollos and the few Europeans allowed to take part in the cabildo, said that, with the immediate threat posed by Álzaga and the peninsular regiments dealt with, all they had to do now was wait for further instructions from the Supreme Central Junta in Seville.

    Ultimately, the only concrete measure the cabildo's members could agree on during their first day was a written statement reaffirming their loyalty to king Ferdinand VII. As they wasted precious time discussing minute details among themselves, just as Liniers had hoped, the viceroy sent a issued of messages to his closest allies not just in Buenos Aires itself, but more distant places as well. One particularly important message was to be sent to the province of Córdoba, instructing the authorities there to raise an army and march on Buenos Aires before the situation in the capital spiraled into an all out revolution (7). Little did he know, however, that the secretary he tasked with dispatching this letter was, in fact, a criollo sympathizer, who sent it to a completely different destination. It wouldn't be until early in the morning of January 3, hours before sunrise, that Liniers realized his mistake: his sleep was interrupted by armed men sent to arrest him.

    The January Revolution had begun.

    With Liniers' treachery revealed, the cabildo abierto's second session was nothing like the first one: the radicals, joined by their moderate colleagues and vindicated on their belief not to trust him, passed a resolution declaring that Liniers was to be removed from the post of viceroy, effective immediately, and his deportation to Spain (8). With the elephant in the room out of the way, the next task was to deliberate on who would form the junta meant to govern in his place, a process which took several hours. In the end, the junta's composition was a compromise between the two main criollo factions: Saavedra, a moderate, was elected president, while Moreno became secretary of War and Government. The exact scenario Liniers sought to prevent became reality, and the conservatives could do nothing except watch helplessly.

    960px-Cabildo_Abierto_-_Pedro_Subercaseaux.jpg

    The cabildo abierto voting on Liniers' dismissal and the junta meant to replace him.

    The first priority of the Provisional Governing Junta of the Provinces of the Río de la Plata, as the revolutionary government named itself, was to cement the power it claimed to have over not only Buenos Aires, but all corners of the viceroyalty it claimed to represent. Messengers were dispatched to negotiate the allegiance of various cities and provinces to the revolutionary cause, while an army under Francisco Ortiz de Ocampo was sent to Córdoba to nip any potential royalist counterattacks from that direction in the bud. By February 1809 the situation had stabilized: most of the viceroyalty had pledged its allegiance to the revolutionaries, except for the province of Paraguay and, most troublingly, the Banda Oriental, still governed by Francisco Javier de Elío. This was a major thorn in the junta's side, since although Elío didn't have enough troops at his disposal to march on Buenos Aires, Montevideo provided a base from which the Spanish navy could launch devastating raids all over the River Plate.

    Still, the Banda Oriental was rife with separatist sentiment, as shown by the successive victories scored by José Artigas, the revolutionary cause's main leader in the region, over the royalists. The local government's tax raises to fund its war against Buenos Aires were highly unpopular in the countryside, and Artigas' support snowballed until, by May 1809, Elío's authority was restricted to Montevideo itself. The revolutionaries' momentum stalled, however, since not only did Montevideo boast formidable defenses, which were strengthened after the British invasion, but the royalists' control of the sea made any siege worthless. Thus, Artigas' troops were forced to settle down for a very long siege (9).

    The situation in Paraguay couldn't be more different, which made the events there all the more memorable. The population there was solidly behind the royalists, less due to genuine loyalty to the Spanish Crown and more out of a desire to become independent from Buenos Aires' authority. The revolutionary government sent an army of roughly 1.000 men under Manuel Belgrano, one of the governing junta's voting members, to subdue the province. After months of marching and enacting various administrative measures on the lands they crossed, Belgrano's army crossed the Paraná River at Campichuelo on May 17 1809, defeating a small Spanish force in the process. The rebels then marched towards Asunción, passing through several deserted villages along the way - a far cry from the reception they expected from the Paraguayan people.

    It wouldn't be until June 20, more than a month later, that they came face to face with another enemy army, at Paraguarí. This was a much more formidable force than the one beaten at Campichuelo: 1.000 Spaniards, reinforced by 3.500 Paraguayans. With his men outnumbered by more than four to one, Belgrano attempted to parlay with his fellow South Americans against the Europeans, but these talks broke down once the Paraguayans made it clear they'd either have their current master or none at all. Despite the huge odds facing his army, Belgrano ordered a frontal attack on the morning of June 21, either putting faith in his troops' fervor or hoping to catch the royalists by surprise.

    It was a success of almost unimaginable proportions. The royalists, not expecting to be attacked by an enemy they outnumbered by such a large margin, were completely surprised by the sight of rebel soldiers charging against their positions. Belgrano ordered for every soldier available to be sent into the fight, and the royalists' confusion gave way to panic as their attempts to regroup were hampered by the rebels' incessant hammer blows (10). By the time the Battle of Paraguarí ended, the royalist army had been scattered, and the Spanish governor of Paraguay, Bernardo de Velasco, was taken prisoner. The path to Asunción was open, and the press in Buenos Aires went haywire once it learned of the feat accomplished by Belgrano's army. But even these news, and the political aftermath of it (Belgrano was an ally of Mariano Moreno), would be pushed aside by another series of events which took place much further north: the revolution had spread to Peru.

    Nuevo_mapa_del_virreinato_del_rio_de_la_plata.PNG

    Spain's southernmost colonies prior to the wars of independence. Upper Peru's provinces are in various shades of pink.
    The source can be seen
    here.

    The first Peruvian city to rise up against the Spanish was Chuquisaca, seat of the Real Audiencia of Charcas. The judges of the Audiencia, following the same rhetoric first used by Melchor de Talamantes and other separatists in New Spain (popular soverignty in the absence of the king), deposed the local governor and established a junta on May 25 1809. In Potosí, a city of great importance due to its silver mines, an attempt by intendant Francisco de Paula Sanz to prevent a mutiny by criollo officers backfired horribly, and he was forced to flee (11). La Paz followed suit not long after, with a junta led by colonel Pedro Murillo, and soon all of Upper Peru was up in arms against the Spanish. These rebels, who lacked a central authority for the time being (their rebellions were all separate, rather than part of a grander conspiracy), knew they needed all the help they could get if they were to survive the inevitable royalist counterattack. Thus, while they worked with one another to create an unified government and army as fast as possible, they also sent messengers to Buenos Aires. Unfortunately, the long distances, bad roads and difficult terrain along the way meant it would take a long time for their call for help to reach its destination, and even longer for reinforcements to arrive.

    The rebels didn't know it yet, but the royalists, despite being practically next door, were not as strong as they feared. The viceroy of Peru, José Fernando de Abascal y Sousa, had a lot to deal with in his plate - besides the rebellion in Upper Peru, there were reports of varying levels of unrest elsewhere, particularly in Tacna, as well as an ongoing revolution in Quito (12). He was, as a result constantly bombarded with requests for help from several regions, many of them out of his jurisdiction, which made it difficult for him to focus his energy on a single area. Thus, it wouldn't be until September 1809, more than four months after the first spark of revolution set Upper Peru ablaze, that he managed to assemble an army of some 5.000 men (which would later grow to 7.000 after extra reinforcements, mainly native militias), led by José Manuel de Goyeneche.

    Much time had passed by this point, more than enough for Buenos Aires to receive and answer the Peruvians' call for help. The army the Provisional Governing Junta sent to occupy Córdoba, still led by general Ocampo, was ordered to march northward with all due haste, and they reached their destination just in time to face the imminent royalist offensive (13). The combined Argentine and Peruvian armies had 8.500 troops in total, many of them hastily trained and poorly armed levies, and faced Goyeneche's forces near the town of Guaqui, just south of Lake Titicaca, on September 29 1809. The Battle of Guaqui was as costly as it was decisive: it stopped the Spanish advance into Upper Peru, but the rebel forces were so battered they were in no shape to follow up their victory. To make matters worse, it soon became clear the Argentines and Peruvians didn't see eye to eye, even if they had a common enemy.

    Upper Peru had been a part of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata before the January Revolution, and the Provisional Governing Junta was eager to reassert Buenos Aires' rule over it, even if under a new banner, and Ocampo, as its highest local representative, made those intentions known. The Peruvian patriots, now united under La Paz's (and, therefore, Murillo's) leadership, balked at this, since they sought to reunite with the other half of Peru (the two regions had been ruled as one since Inca times, after all) and create a single, independent country capable of standing up to Madrid, Buenos Aires and anyone else (14). There was a racial factor as well: many porteños saw their Peruvian counterparts with disdain, due to their high degree of native ancestry. The latter, on their part, feared the troops of their so-called allies could end their newfound freedom if they became too strong, so they often withheld supplies and weapons from them, worsening the revolutionaries' logistics as a whole.

    The war stagnated as a result, with no noticeable changes along the front line besides a rebellion in Tacna that brought said city into the revolutionary fold in June 1810 (15). Battle after battle was fought along the shores of Lake Titicaca, but even when the revolutionaries won they couldn't advance more than a few kilometers at a time - the royalists were just too heavily entrenched. Even then, however, the Spanish position was far from ideal: the stalemate in Peru left viceroy Abascal unable to detach troops from his army to help fellow royalists elsewhere, such as in Chile and New Granada, much to the relief of the pro-independence groups in those regions, at least for the time being (16). The gridlock lasted until April 1812, when truly earth-shattering news came from Spain: Ferdinand VII was back on his rightful throne.

    Most important of all, however, was the news that Spain was no longer an absolute monarchy. This was thanks to the work of the Cortes, which, after months of deliberation between its deputies, who ranged from liberals to conservatives and everyone in between, crafted a constitution which, despite establishing Catholicism as the state's official religion and giving several rights to the king, made it clear his power wasn't limitless anymore (17). This was an unacceptable development to Abascal, a hardline supporter of absolutism, who first tried to suppress news of the new constitution and, after failing to do so, refused to apply its provisions in the areas under his control. This approach, though a blatant act of rebellion against the country the viceroy claimed to serve, met little, if any opposition from the officers in the royalist army: most of them were fellow absolutists, their convictions hardened by years of war against people who followed the same ideologies the constitution represented.

    510px-Pedro_D%C3%ADaz_-_Jos%C3%A9_Fernando_de_Abascal.jpg

    By the end of his tenure as viceroy of Peru, Abascal was an independent ruler in all but name.

    But even if the army remained loyal, there was no shortage of people, many of whom already dissatisfied with Spanish rule, who saw Abascal's decision as the straw that broke the camel's back. One place where this sentiment was particularly prevalent was the city of Cusco, capital of the Inca Empire before its conquest by the Spanish almost three centuries prior. In the months that followed the arrival of news of the Spanish constitution, and Abascal's reaction to it, four brothers, José, Vicente, Mariano and Juan Angulo, began to plan an uprising, and slowly recruited allies among the members of the cabildo and the city garrison. One of the conspiracy's most important supporters was Mateo Pumacahua, a 72 year old Quechua kuraca (local noble) who, besides being one of the most prominent members of Peru's immense native population, also possessed a wealth of military experience - he played a critical role in the defeat of Túpac Amaru II more than thirty years before, and was recalled from retirement to lead native militias (a crucial component of the royalist forces) against the ongoing Peruvian rebellion. Pumacahua was so trusted by the Spanish authorities, thanks to his record, that he was appointed interim president of the Real Audiencia of Cusco.

    Alas, that very trust meant the royalists were caught completely off guard when Cusco rose up against them, on August 9 1812. Troops loyal to the plotters took over the city in a matter of hours, and a junta of three members, Pumacahua the most senior of them, was proclaimed. The old general's call to arms was heeded by at least 20.000 people, the overwhelming majority of them Quechua natives. The symbolism of the colonizers losing control of the heart of the empire they conquered centuries ago was a profound one, and the rebel cusqueño administration followed up this success by sending an army, led by Pumacahua in person, to Arequipa, and dispatching a messenger to La Paz so as to begin talks with the revolutionary government in Upper Peru and its Argentine allies (18).

    The revolutionary armies, bristling with tens of thousands of new recruits, began an offensive that swept its way through southern (lower) Peru from mid August onward, and, before Abascal and his subordinates could even begin to react, word reached Lima that yet another huge revolt had broken out behind the front, this time in Huánuco (19). With the war threatening to spill into the central Peruvian highlands, the royalists mounted a desperate attempt to stop the revolutionaries from combining with this latest rebellion at Huamanga, on October 12 1812. It was a crushing defeat, one that robbed the Spanish of their last army of note in Peru. Now there was nothing standing between the combined patriot forces and their ultimate goal: the city of Lima, whose capture was essential if the former colonies were to secure their freedom.

    With his rule in Peru collapsing like a house of cards after the defeat at Huamanga, Abascal concluded he had no other option left but to flee. With the seas swarming with the vessels of pro-independence privateers like Thomas Cochrane and William Brown, the viceroy and his entourage had to evacuate Lima over land. Leaving the capital on October 27, Abascal made a beeline northward, towards New Granada, where a powerful Spanish army under Pablo Morillo had scored a series of victories against local pro-independence forces (20). The vanguard of the revolutionary army set off in pursuit, entering Lima just two days later under a surprisingly muted reception from local criollos, who were less than excited at the sight of thousands of armed natives on the streets.

    The chase, immortalized in more books and movies than any reasonable person can bother to count, went on for weeks and several hundred kilometers, the pursuers almost catching up to their quarry on several occasions, but, ultimately, Abascal and his retinue were only one stroke of bad luck away from becoming prisoners or worse. And that was exactly what happened to them when they stopped at the city of Cajamarca on November 19. Unaware the commander of the local garrison was in cahoots with the revolutionaries, having been contacted by them a few days prior, Abascal and some of his secretaries went out to meet with him, only to be arrested on the spot. Horsemen from the Argentine contingent of the revolutionary army arrived hours later, followed later still by troops bearing the flags of the cusqueño and Upper Peruvian contingents.

    The gig was up.

    While the Capitulation of Cajamarca did not mark the end of the war with Spain - Morillo's army still had to be expelled from New Granada - it did seal Peru's independence from its colonial overlord. Celebrations broke out in multiple major cities all over the former Spanish colonies in South America once news of the capitulation reached them, from Caracas to Lima, La Paz, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Montevideo. Much like the liberation of Cusco back in August, Abascal's capture and subsequent surrender was profoundly symbolic to native Peruvians, since the viceroy was apprehended in the same place where Atahualpa, last ruler of the Inca Empire, was captured and later executed by the Spanish. With the war now moving outside of Peru's borders, the time had come to, much like in Mexico and later Argentina, summon a congress to decide the young nation's destiny. The task of organizing the elections for this congress, and governing the country until the deputies convened, was entrusted to a triune junta made up of José de la Mar (a former royalist general), Bernardo de Monteagudo (a lawyer and one of the intellectual leaders of the uprising in Chuquisaca) and, perhaps unsurprisingly, Mateo Pumacahua.

    360px-Jose_de_La_Mar_3.JPG
    363px-Bernardo_de_Monteagudo.jpg
    640px-Pumacahua.jpg

    Left to right: José de la Mar, Bernardo de Monteagudo and Mateo Pumacahua, rulers of Peru from November 1812 until May 1813.

    And what a task it was: three years of war had left Peru utterly devastated, with tens of thousands of civilians dead or maimed, and hundreds of thousands more forced to flee their homes. Mining and agricultural production ground to a halt, paralyzing the economy and threatening to cause a famine, while the collapse of the administrative structure set up by the Spanish led to a surge of banditry in the countryside. Fortunately, one thing the triumvirate didn't need to worry about was paying the army: Abascal's flight from Lima was made in such a hurry he was forced to leave a fabulous treasure, some estimating to be worth as much as US$208 million in today's money, behind (21). This unexpected gift was nothing short of a godsend to the revolutionary government, since several regiments of their army were on the verge of mutiny, and it also allowed their nascent state to pay off some of the debts it accumulated over the course of the war.

    After almost seven months in power, the junta relinquished power to the First National Assembly, made up of 96 deputies, on May 25 1813. The date chosen for this act was no coincidence - it was the fourth anniversary of the rebellion in Chuquisaca, the event that began the Peruvian War of Independence. Still, much like other congresses of its kind, it took only a few sessions for any air of national unity to vanish, replaced by fierce regional and ideological divisions. The deputies from Lima and its surrounding area, many of whom were former royalists, were generally more conservative than those from the interior and Upper Peru, regions which, besides being hotbeds of anti-Spanish sentiment, also had a considerable native population. The main points of contention between the two factions were what form of government Peru should adopt and where the capital should be located.

    The limeños, who wished to disturb the status quo as little as possible and thus salvage at least some of their privileges, predictably argued the capital should remain in their city, while many of their opponents, just as eager to have a bigger say in government, defended the idea of transferring Peru's capital to Cusco. The pro-Cusco party also called for the creation of a constitutional monarchy, one headed by a descendant of the Inca emperors, a proposal that had many supporters in the army. The limeños balked at this, ostensibly because they sought to follow the example set by other former Spanish colonies (other than Mexico) and establish a republic, but really because they didn't want to live under a native head of state. Other topics of fierce debate were the extent of the franchise and the continued existence of forced labour practices like the mit'a, a holdover from Inca times.

    With the Spanish military ever further away with each defeat it suffered in New Granada, far beyond Peru's northern border, there was no unifying threat to force the First National Assembly to get its act together. The pro-Cusco party had a majority of the seats on paper, but their ranks were rife with internal divisions, with some deputies espousing far more radical proposals than others. A resolution establishing a constitutional monarchy was approved without much hassle, but all that did was shift the conversation to who would be given the crown: two candidates were considered, one of which, Juan Bautista Túpac Amaru, was in his sixties and had no heir, while the other, Dionisio Inca Yupanqui, was a leading advocate of native rights, making him unpalatable to many members of the criollo elite (22). The issue clung to the Assembly's neck like an albatross, and all kicking the can down the road did was worsen tensions between its members.
    Primer_Congreso_Constituyente_del_Per%C3%BA_%281822%29_-_Capilla_de_la_Universidad_San_Marcos.jpg

    The First National Assembly.

    Soon, the "Inca question" was brought up almost every time the Assembly convened to vote on whatever issue was brought to the table that day, each candidate's leading supporters not wasting a single opportunity to strengthen their cause among the deputies. All they accomplished was poisoning the well even further, with sessions officially devoted to discussing matters as "simple" as taxation devolving into shouting matches and fistfights on a few occasions. One infamous example happened on September 2 1813, when Francisco Antonio de Zela, a deputy from Tacna, attempted to present a bill which, if approved, would incorporate the native militias into the regular army (23). Instead, the bill was snatched from his hands and torn to shreds by another deputy, triggering a general brawl involving some 60 or so congresspeople that lasted for more than half an hour (24). Alas, Zela had a copy of the bill at his disposal just in case, and it was approved, under much tension, several hours later.

    The Assembly's antics and purported lack of efficiency earned much frustration and scorn from the public, with crowds of hundreds or even thousands of people supporting this or that proposal congregating outside the main building of Lima's University of San Marcos, the place where the deputies were gathered. They were often met by other crowds who supported different policies, and the army had to step in multiple times, when their clashes escalated into vicious street battles with scores of casualties. Finally, on October 14 1813, a group of pro-Cusco army officers decided enough was enough. Led by the twenty-eight year old captain Agustín Gamarra, a mestizo from Cusco, 18 young officers entered the Assembly's main chamber right as the deputies were about to start debating the issue of the day. They stood on a spot reserved for the general public, seemingly intending to watch the upcoming legislative session unfold, and were immediately ordered to leave. The officers complied without saying a word, but not before scraping their sheathed swords against the floor on their way out (25).

    No punishment was ever meted out against them.

    The ruido de sables ("noise of sabers"), as this event became known, was a watershed moment in Peruvian history, one almost as important as the Chuquisaca Revolution and the various battles fought during the war of independence. It showed that there was another method with which one could get their way in politics, not through elections and debates, but through military might and all that entailed. Thoroughly intimidated by Gamarra's gesture and how he and his colleagues got away with it, the limeño deputies of the First National Assembly ceased all resistance to the laws proposed by their cusqueño adversaries. The Empire of Peru's first monarch would be Dionisio Inca Yupanqui, who, to the surprise of many, kept his original name instead of adopting a regnal one. All forms of forced labor were abolished, but no administrative body was established to enforce that. The right to vote was restricted to those who owned rural properties past a certain size, ensuring the countryside's political supremacy over the cities. That the capital stayed at Lima was but a fig leaf.

    The cusqueño party got almost everything it wanted, but at a cost whose true extent wouldn't manifest itself until much later.
    461px-Dionisio_Inca_Yupanqui.jpg

    Dionisio Inca Yupanqui, first emperor of Peru. It was he who would have to deal with the eventual fallout of the ruido de sables.

    ------------------
    Notes:

    (1) This is OTL. The colors were stored in the Santo Domingo Convent, in Buenos Aires, and are there to this day.

    (2) This is OTL too. The junta was dissolved after the arrival of Baltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros, who replaced Liniers as viceroy of the Río de la Plata.

    (3) IOTL they made a huge demonstration demanding Liniers' resignation instead of deposing him outright, probably to keep a veneer of legality, but this gave Saavedra and other criollos enough time to fight back.

    (4) A consequence of the butterflies born in Mexico.

    (5) The Plaza de Mayo's name commemorates the May Revolution, so if said revolution takes place in January, it only makes sense for it to be called Plaza de Enero ITTL.

    (6) Again, a consequence of the radicalization brought about by the events in Mexico.

    (7) Liniers organized a counterrevolution IOTL, so he'd almost certainly try something similar in this scenario.

    (8) Liniers' proven treachery, plus the lack of the controversy surrounding his execution, means his reputation will be far more negative ITTL.

    (9) Montevideo resisted the Argentine revolutionaries for several years IOTL.

    (10) According to what I found the Argentine army's initial assault was actually pretty successful IOTL, but their soldiers began to loot their enemies' supply stores, and their advance lost momentum. This allowed the Spanish and Paraguayans to launch a counterattack and defeat them.

    (11) Sanz was able to keep control of Potosí IOTL, and this was a huge setback for the revolutionaries in Chuquisaca and La Paz.

    (12) This revolution was suppressed by troops from Peru IOTL. Since Abascal already has his hands full with Upper Peru ITTL, he's forced to leave the quiteños alone and pray their revolt doesn't spread too far.

    (13) Ocampo didn't approve of Liniers' execution, so the junta in Buenos Aires replaced him with Juan José Castelli. Since said execution is butterflied away, he keeps his command.

    (14) There were quite a few politicians in Peru and Bolivia who wanted to unite the two countries IOTL, albeit they disagreed on which of those countries should lead said union. It was this disagreement that tore the Peru-Bolivian Confederation apart after just three years, since the Peruvians refused to live under Bolivian domination.

    (15) This revolt broke out in 1811 IOTL, and was repressed.

    (16) This means the royalists aren't able to reconquer Chile ITTL.

    (17) Almost all of Spain was under French occupation when the Cortes first convened at Cádiz IOTL, so only a few regions could send their representatives. This meant the deputies there were overwhelmingly liberal, as was the constitution they created. Here the Supreme Central Junta doesn't dissolve until the war is won, so when the Cortes' composition is far more conservative compared to OTL. Ferdinand VII still hates the constitution because he's an absolutist jackass, but many people who would otherwise help him abrogate it are willing to give it a shot.

    (18) The Cusco rebellion spread rapidly, but it was eventually suppressed IOTL. Pumacahua was executed, as were three of the four Angulo brothers.

    (19) This revolt was quickly defeated IOTL.

    (20) This is basically OTL, albeit a few years earlier since the French are kicked out of Spain sooner.

    (21) This treasure was meant be transported to Mexico City by sea IOTL, but the crew tasked with doing this went pirate and supposedly buried it in Cocos Island.

    (22) Dionisio served as a deputy in the Cortes of Cádiz IOTL.

    (23) Zela led the 1811 Tacna revolt and was imprisoned following its suppression. He never regained his freedom, and eventually died in Panama.

    (24) This tidbit was inspired by an incident that happened in Taiwan's parliament a few days ago, where a deputy grabbed some documents and ran away with them.


    (25) This bit, meanwhile, was inspired by (and named after) a similar event that happened in Chile IOTL.​
     
    Top