pisces74 said:
Given the strange bedfellows that history has often provided is it such a stretch that there *may* have been some collusion. I'm not saying that there was, but its not outside the realm of possibility.
Secondly while not all liberals are apologists, nearly all apologists are liberals.
just like while not all muslims are suicide bombers, nearly all suicide bombers are muslim.
Hum, I have found a LOT of nationalist apologists, outside of USA, at least peoples wgo could side for the islamists and baathists in this case. Plus surely many libertarians.
But the liberals=apologists is ridiculous. Radicals liberals are against BOTH imperialistic USA and the insurgents. Do you know why? Because, like a foolish friend that I have said it; 'America pose the greater threat'. Islamists and other terrorists can't invade a country and rule, jam their market, cause teleguided political troubles, etc... Frankly, 9/11 was an overblown thing, excuse this frank brutalness. This just a papercut to America, compared to what the Second Irakian War is doing to Irak.
I disagree with his choice of teh lesser evil, but you can certainly see their point.