For the last time...trolls do not eat tomatos. They eat stakes. Stay at home.
Truly LXEagle, you're not bringing anything serious into this conversation. Either chill or reconsider your approach, please.
For the last time...trolls do not eat tomatos. They eat stakes. Stay at home.
Calm down.For the last time...trolls do not eat tomatos. They eat stakes. Stay at home.
You may confuse tomatoes with spinach, that in Popeye the Sailor Man give extra strength, and are probably a strategic ressource in this world.
Unfortunatly spinach doesn't give extra strength in reality and neither tomatoes that aren't a strategic ressource.
Furthermore, logic being an hard mistress, Romans couldn't have heard about tomatoes before going in Americas for, interesting detail, tomatoes originate from Americas.
Therefore, knowing about tomatoes before going to Americas is impossible; and arguing that tomatoes could have been a motor for develloping Roman naval technology is a logical fallacy.
Got it?
And if my aunt had some, I would have called her "my uncle".
You don't devellop technologies out of nowhere with a precise goal in mind (well, except in Civilization, but I assume we're talking about real world there).
As they didn't have a motivation for doing so (remember, not knowing tomatoes or Americas...Still following me?), they wouldn't have wanted to go in these technological branches, for you see, practical technological advances are based on needs.
So, yeah, if they had Renaissance age ships, they would have probably used them. And if they had space rockets, you would probably have Romans on the Moon at some point.
The Alien Space Bats section is just below the Pre and Post-1900 sections, you can't miss it.
Your Tomato-fetish is really disturbing at this point, that it deserved an answer. Your propositions are...hugely irrealistic (I would rather use another word, but I'm told that there is children on the board) and if you don't like being corrected on historical or even logical bases, I suggest you to ignore me but I don't think I'd be the only one eventually to point out the problems with your...ah...reasoning.
So now we go onto the subject of potatoes?
Seriously, the only way I can see the Romans ending up across the Atlantic is in some earlier iteration of the Cabral expedition, heading down the coast of Africa and being blown across to Brazil in a storm. That would only be likely to happen if there were expeditions coasting down Africa's west coast at least on a semi-regular basis. Now we have to have a plausible reason for that (King Solomon's Mines anyone?)
Incidentally, the grain ships that took Egyptian and other North African grain to Italy would have been quite capable of surviving Atlantic voyages.
Incidentally, the grain ships that took Egyptian and other North African grain to Italy would have been quite capable of surviving Atlantic voyages.
Well there were ancient expeditions around Africa OTL : Nechao's expedition, Hannon,...Seriously, the only way I can see the Romans ending up across the Atlantic is in some earlier iteration of the Cabral expedition, heading down the coast of Africa and being blown across to Brazil in a storm. That would only be likely to happen if there were expeditions coasting down Africa's west coast at least on a semi-regular basis. Now we have to have a plausible reason for that (King Solomon's Mines anyone?)
The ships? Maybe. Their crew, err...Incidentally, the grain ships that took Egyptian and other North African grain to Italy would have been quite capable of surviving Atlantic voyages.
The accidental re-direction of a Phoenician fleet to Brazil is the most plausible approach I think. but the ability of that fleet to return to the Med is problematic at best. resulting in an interesting, but inconsequential pre-columbian exchange, at least for Europe. (when did smallpox appear in Europe anyway?).
If this accidental voyage did occur, there would have been little to the south of the Brazilian landfall. to the north they would have encountered the Maya. What would have been the result, remember that the Phoenicians do not have the option of calling for reinforcements.
BTW, this is a favorite theme of mine
If this accidental voyage did occur, there would have been little to the south of the Brazilian landfall. to the north they would have encountered the Maya. What would have been the result, remember that the Phoenicians do not have the option of calling for reinforcements.
continuing to play with this idea...lets assume that the Phoenicians had several ships that had foundered on the Brazilian coast. Husbanding their resources they were able to send ships north into the Caribbean. i.e. the Maya sphere, nascent as it might have been.
Aside from the technological advances they might have shared there would also be knowledge of the " old world".
It seems to me that the implications could be quite significant.
Mmm, that's interesting but I'm a bit unconvinced.
As you said, coffee was found in Ethiopia (but not only, in Arabia as well) and nobody really minded up to at the very best the Xth century while one major trade road passed just trough there.
I understand that this variety could be more economically lucrative, but if nobody minded in first place, why should they because they found it on a lost archipelago?