I wanted to do a regular timeline format to skip ahead but got bored doing that. Thought this was more fun.So, what's with the countdown?
Yes.So, the war started at January of 1471?
Squee! This is awesome and great! Soon we shall see the Roman Marines kick ass!
After the regular army is routed, though.
Its really, really unlikely but it can happen.More stuff; would a Personal Union between Bulgaria and the ERE be possible in the future?
>Implying Romania can conquer Bulgaria.I highly doubt it.Were there even any female Bulgarian rulers?It would be a precedent to do sther than that,the Bulgarian ruler has a lot of sons of his own.More than that,the Bulgarian nobility was more interested in conquering the ERE than to be a part of it.Finally,it would be against the Church's rules for John to marry the sister of his brother-in-law(although a dispensation shouldn't be hard to get).If you are willing to use force to get Bulgaria,you may as well as clean the house,get rid of most of it's native nobility except for those that are willing to defect to the empire and make it a proper province of the empire--saves a lot of trouble on the long run.Use population transfer as well.The last thing the empire needs is a third Bulgarian Empire.
Why not all 3? Have the rivals smash themselves and then turn on the exhausted Ottomans, setting themselves up as the prominent Anatolian power.I'm quite concerned by Germiyan. Either they could support the Ottomans conquer territory held by the coalition with them, or they could sweep in when everyone else is tired out, and create a greater threat than even the Ottomans were.
Well they have the home field advantage and the single best organized, equipped and well trained army. They are pretty outnumbered though, I'd say at worst there's a 3:1 disadvantage.I wonder if the Byzantines can encourage the Bulgarians to assist them in exchange for that Serbia territory? Would certainly help having those soldiers to hand. Though it may not be worth it now that the area has been pacified.
Are the ottomans really going to be able to fight a two front war against the Romans and the rest of the Turks?
Really loving the mix of narrative styles
They can still pay and train their armed forces. (Remember, the Janissaries were started by Orhan before any expansion into Europe had occurred.) What the Ottomans have now was the most developed part of Byzantine Asia and therefore is still a pretty wealthy area to build a power base from (as the Empire of Nicaea will tell you). That said, its quite a bit smaller than OTL without the manpower and resources of the Balkans behind them.I don't think it's impossible. The quality of the Ottoman army, when compared to other armies of this period was superb,assuming the Ottomans are still able to pay for their army(which would have been much more difficult but not impossible if they decreased their army or raid other Muslim states),given they don't have anymore Christian states to raid or conquer.Another thing is that coalitions are made up of states that have their own ambitions,and are generally suspicious of each other's motivations.
The sheer amount of manpower behind the coalition speaks otherwise, but that said you're on point here.They generally won't go all out to assist one another and will try to settle for peace independently of one another if things don't turn out well in a short time. If the Ottomans still have their superb army and at the same time exploit the poor coordination and paranoia of the coalition army,they should be able to defeat the coalition without trouble.
Someone's been reading my notes.i predict trebizond will enter this war late and sweep up the tired competition
Joking aside, this may end up a prryhic victory for the ottomans. They have the best army, but the coalition may be able to inflict some pain on them.
They can probably do it if they try it in two to three decade's time.>Implying Romania can conquer Bulgaria.
I can see the campaign turning out into some kind of Battle of Sarhu kind of situation where the 'coalition' turns into each state doing their own thing with the Ottomans engaging one opponent at a time and beating them with their superb quality.Murad was by all means a fairly competent commander.Why not all 3? Have the rivals smash themselves and then turn on the exhausted Ottomans, setting themselves up as the prominent Anatolian power.
Well they have the home field advantage and the single best organized, equipped and well trained army. They are pretty outnumbered though, I'd say at worst there's a 3:1 disadvantage.
They can still pay and train their armed forces. (Remember, the Janissaries were started by Orhan before any expansion into Europe had occurred.) What the Ottomans have now was the most developed part of Byzantine Asia and therefore is still a pretty wealthy area to build a power base from (as the Empire of Nicaea will tell you). That said, its quite a bit smaller than OTL without the manpower and resources of the Balkans behind them.
The sheer amount of manpower behind the coalition speaks otherwise, but that said you're on point here.
Someone's been reading my notes.
Nope. With Ivan Alexander managing to get Bulgaria back under central control (which is something I see that would have happened given no Ottomans in the Balkans and not one but 3 boogymen for the state to take advantage of) the Bulgarians can finally put their massive manpower to use. That combined with good relations between the two and the fact Romania needs their grain makes attempting a conquest a bad proposition.They can probably do it if they try it in two to three decade's time.
Possibly.I can see the campaign turning out into some kind of Battle of Sarhu kind of situation where the 'coalition' turns into each state doing their own thing with the Ottomans engaging one opponent at a time and beating them with their superb quality.Murad was by all means a fairly competent commander.
Via blockading, moving troops around, bombing ports and helping to co-ordinate between the coalition.How will sea power play into this Bosphoran War?
You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.I personally believe just to mess with us Soverihn will make the Ottomans win just to make us question what Rome's endgame will be.
Finally gone through the entire timeline, and hitting the subscribe button way too much to make sure I don't miss any of it.
Here's hoping the Ottomans get put in their proper place with this war.
Greeat Tl. Can't wait to read more of it. Please keep it coming!
I must say though that the Ottomans will probably win the war and might even get a few territories,but with it's expansion curtailed due to the casualties taken in fighting off the Coalition.It's perfectly possible that neither the Manisa League or the Ottomans would have something they can call a conclusive victory; the Ottomans win on land, but lose at sea.
Is there going to be a new map soon?
I dunno. Denmark might still be doing their wars of conquest but how successful thatll be I got not idea. Any suggestions?More stuff; how is Scandinavia in this timeline?
I look forward to the next update.
I dunno. Denmark might still be doing their wars of conquest but how successful thatll be I got not idea. Any suggestions?
As do I. Probably should be up by next week.
1.) Edit: You know, I at least hope that Aydin's memory will be respected even after it is destroyed.
Nah that's highly unlikely.I hope so to!
Perhaps after many years of Eastern Roman expansion in Anatolia and good relations with Aydin, maybe some form of peaceful absorption is on the cards. I have no idea if something like that is possible.
All I really know is that we have to pressure Sov to find a way to make Aydin survive in the ERE!!
Again, always impressed with this timeline. It will be interesting to see how the war against the Ottomans go, and indeed, how Timur plays into this in the years to come...
Maybe.Hmm, a thought; when the New World is discovered, would Tobacco still catch on?