Crisis in the Kremlin - Our 1982 USSR

If I were ever to make 2nd timeline, which one would you be most interested in?

  • 1. German Empire 1888

    Votes: 62 29.2%
  • 2. Russian Federation 1993

    Votes: 74 34.9%
  • 3. Red China 1949

    Votes: 37 17.5%
  • 4. Yugoslavia 1920

    Votes: 27 12.7%
  • 5. India 1947

    Votes: 28 13.2%
  • 6. alt-fascist Italy 1922

    Votes: 29 13.7%
  • 7. South Africa 1994

    Votes: 18 8.5%
  • 8. Germany 1990

    Votes: 20 9.4%
  • 9. Japan 2000

    Votes: 18 8.5%
  • 10. United Kingdom 1997

    Votes: 20 9.4%

  • Total voters
    212
  • Poll closed .
Ok comrades, next update will be on friday - you've been in power for 3 years and 6 months and it must be said that you are doing your job very well, as things are going finally in right direction for the USSR, but your greatest tests is ahead of you, as after the next update you are going to deal with 5 major crises at the same time. I am really curious how you will deal with them :)
 
If somebody is wondering what is going on with comrade Yeltsin - since December 1985 he is the first secretary of the Moscow gorkom of the CPSU and a member of liberal faction of the CPSU. Currently he is a right hand of Yegor Ligachyov, which makes him de-facto 2nd most influential member of the Liberal faction. On personal note, Yeltsin for now supports the current ruling conservative - liberal - technocrat coalition, but we will see what happens in the near future.
 
Later today I will write down the exact list of members of the soviet government, CPSU highest officials and other most important positions with faction affiliations, to make it clear what the current power structure in the USSR looks like.
 
Last edited:
Yes, its starting to develop quickly, as computerization efforts in the USSR are expanding. Tetris is already released in 1985. I will cover it in update after April 1986.
Ah ok.
If somebody is wondering what is going on with comrade Yeltsin - since December 1985 he is the first secretary of the Moscow gorkom of the CPSU and a member of liberal faction of the CPSU. Currently he is a right hand of Yegor Ligachyov, which makes him de-facto 2nd most influential member of the Liberal faction. On personal note, Yeltsin for now supports the current ruling conservative - liberal - technocrat coalition, but we will see what happens in the near future.
So we should be careful with what we do so Yeltsin continues to support the coalition...
Later today I will write down the exact list of members of the soviet government, CPSU highest officials and other most important positions with faction affiliations, to make it clear what the current power structure in the USSR looks like.
🍀Good luck.
 
Also, when it comes to power balance in the USSR - to sum it up, all power in the USSR belongs to the General Secretary Romanov, who is the most powerful person in the Soviet Union since comrade Stalin. His rule is absolute and no one dares to defy him. Potential opposition (reformers, liberals, old guard etc.) were turned into his allies, as those factions were not sidelined or supressed, but became part of the ruling coalition. Besides, factions are fragmented and kept in balance by comrade Romanov, so no faction is strong enough to dominate the others. Besides, the conservative factions, which is the most powerful, was completely remodeled by comrade Romanov to keep up with quickly changing world, which allowed the conservatives to keep their core while embracing new and fresh ideas. Comrade Romanov by no means is a conservative and neo-stalinist, but he is very pragmatic and realist politician, which allowed him to prepare the Soviet leadership and power structure to keep up with all the changes happening in the world. The emergence of neo-Stalinist movement in the USSR is the best example of it - the cult of Stalin is back alive, but in a very modern and "cool" version so to say.
 
Last edited:
Ah ok, as long as it's not as big during Stalin's reign.
It wouldn't be, simply because the USSR is too large and influential to worship a dead man like in present-day DPRK. The USSR also has much more political diversity and is not ethnically homogenous (1989 USSR: Russians, ~51%, 2008 DPRK: Korean, 99.998%), as well as the fact they aren't ruled by a familial dynasty. Stalin's children never had any major role in the Soviet government, even during Iosif Vissarionovich's own lifetime.

There is no reason to worship Stalin either, only to praise him for being the leader the Soviets needed during their hour of greatest need, which is very common among countries. As for the Neo-Stalinist movement, I could see it catching on with developing countries because of his ideas of industrialization and defense-complex spending, which many dictatorships gravitate to as they establish themselves. They may remain a factor in the USSR exactly because of how popular he is for "saving" the USSR (in their belief, accuracy questionable), but no one would actually outright worship him like they do the Kim family in the DPRK.
 
Can't wait for further exploration of our new USSR, will be really cool to start seeing more consequences of our previous political actions.

Whats far more interesting to me though is how the American electorate will react to our resurgent and conservative/neostalinist USSR.

Слава СССР!
 
1. Should be the Soviet Jews allowed by the government to emigrate from the USSR?


2. Please write down how should the USSR respond to the Black Sea incident and violation of Soviet territorial waters by the US Navy?

3. Following the success of the Mir space stations, the Soviet government had allocated additional funds to the Soviet space program. Please write down to which new/old projects the additional funds may be allocated?

4. Mikail Gorbachev had landed in Beijing to seek an agreement with China? Taking into account the Chinese demands (withdrawal from Afghanistan, halting aid to Vietnam and the issue of Mongolia), please write down how should we convince China for a diplomatic rapprochement and establishment of trade relations?

5. Please write down which ideas/policies could be implemented by the Soviet government to make the Soviet women truly free and equal to men in the USSR?

6. Please write down what should be the focus of the twelfth five-year plan?
1. Allowed by? Yes of course, although not ones with high clearances, of course that would go for anyone in the USSR (and in most other countries), regardless of ethnicity.

2. The Soviet Navy should be concerned with territorial defense above all else, and our focus should be on preemptive detection and matching of enemy firepower in our waters. However, we need to chart "innnocent passage" through American waters, perhaps in the Pacific, although not so brazen that it ends up as an open battle which we would surely lose.

3. We need to fund and further develop satellites for reconnaissance of enemy territories and greater mapping for our own forces. GLONASS is also useful for weapons, as satellite guided weapons need no target designator which can be found, or can be intercepted. Having these capabilities equivalent to or greater than NATO should be a top priority, since, if we cannot match their naval and air forces, we should be able to at least know more about them than they do of our own capabilities.

4. China is a rising power and a massive market for us to engage in. Fighting with them will only push them into the American corner and we cannot afford two of the largest countries and industries on earth opposing us at once. It should be important to establish a positive trade relationship and begin to invest in their industry in our country, although we should be wary of their economic potential eclipsing our own, and their companies becoming too invested. To this effect, maybe proposing joint investment zones, paired with each other in each country (for example, the Irkutsk Oblast and the Wuhan Province paired as joint investment zones, where each country can invest freely into the other's area, while limiting their activities elsewhere).

5. It would not be as easy as simply implementing all the same laws for men and women, but there should be a campaign to improve the role of Soviet Women in industries that are traditionally male-dominated, such as industrial and technological jobs, perhaps harkening back to when Women were a large part of the War Effort in the Great Patriotic War. Provide paid parental leave of a generous amount, perhaps twenty-six weeks (half a year) starting upon labor, for both parents. The campaign should also focus on limiting alcohol use and heavily punishing spousal abuse, which is perhaps the most common way that Soviet Women are kept down, and would also greatly improve our industries by productivity. Men are much better workers when not drunk, and women are much better workers when they aren't being beaten at home.

Decriminalize abortion up to ten weeks and provide knowledge and safe use of contraceptives, while implementing pro-natal positions to ensure that women are taught to want children, but in a safe way and without resorting to late-term, illegal, unsafe abortions or stuck at home with an abusive husband, soon-to-be abusive father.

6. The Focus of the 12th Five Year Plan should be the improvement of the nation to modern technological standards in all aspects, and computerization of the civilian front. The Automation of the production should be a secondary focus, to move away from teams of laborers at our assembly plants, moving to the machining and assembly of goods as in other nations. Take, for example, a tank factory. Instead of fifty laborers working manual machines and assembly, make it twenty-five men, who are proficient in their area of modern vehicle construction, whether it be welding, machining, or finish work, it will all be massively improved with automated machining. Focus first on our most important military production, but then build better goods for the civilian sector. Our goods have historically lacked heavily in both quantity and quality from Western goods, and we should change at least one of those, hopefully soon to be both, by the end of this 5Y Plan. The construction of new semiconductor and microchip factories should be paramount as well, on the equivalent level as the construction of new-generation fighter jets and tanks.
 
Soviet leadership (1986)
490b9de40e096874b1058b414a1ee293.jpg


Soviet government & other positions
General Secretary - Grigory Romanov (Conservatives/Neo-Stalinists)
Second General Secretary - Dinmukhamed Kunaev (Moderates/National Minorities)
Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet - Vasily Kuznetsov (Old Guard/Bureaucracy/Russian Faction)
Premier - Nikolai Ryzhkov (Technocrats/Bureaucracy)
First Deputy Premier - Eduard Shevardnadze (Moderates/National Minorities)
Deputy Premier & Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Mikhail Gorbachev (Reformists)
Deputy Premier & State Planning Comittee - Yegor Ligachyov (Liberals)
Ministry of Industry - Vitalyi Konopalov (Technoctats/Moderates)
Ministry of Internal Affairs - Alexandr Vlasov (Conservatives/Moderates)
Ministry of Education - Pyotr Demichev (Conservatives/Russian Faction)
Ministry of Defence - Viktor Kulikov (Soviet Armed Forces)
Comittee of State Security - Viktor Chebricov (KGB/Conservatives)
Main Intelligence Directorate - Pyotr Ivashutin (Secret Services/Old Guard/Russian Faction)
First Secretary of Komsolom - Gury Marchuk (Technocrats/Liberals)
Ministry of Agriculture - Grigoryi Zolotukhin (Technocrats/Conservatives)
Security Council of the USSR - Andrei Gromyko (Moderates/Bureaucracy)

PP1432_1_l.jpg


Soviet Republics

1. Armenian SSR - Karen Demirchyan (Conservatives)
2. Azerbaijan SSR - Ayaz Mutallibov (Moderates/Technocrats)
3. Byelorussian SSR - Mikhail Kovalev (Conservatives)
4. Estonian SSR - Karl Vaino (Conservatives/Russian Faction)
5. Georgian SSR - Dmitry Levanovich Kartvelishvili (Conservatives/National Minorities)
6. Kazakh SSR - Nursultan Nazarbayev (Conservatives/National Minorities)
7. Kirghiz SSR - Turdakun Usubaliev (Old Guard/Moderates)
8. Latvian SSR - Boris Pugo (Conservatives)
9. Lithuanian SSR - Ringaudas Songaila (Moderates)
10. Moldavian SSR - Semion Grossu (Technocrat/Russian Faction)
11. Russian SFSR - Mikhail Yasnov (Old Guard/Bureacracy)
12. Tajik SSR - Qahhor Mahkamov (Conservatives/Moderates)
13. Turkmen SSR - Muhammetnazar Gapurow (Old Guard/Conservatives)
14. Ukrainian SSR - Volodymyr Shcherbytsky (Old Guard/Russian Faction)
15. Uzbek SSR - Inomjon Usmonxoʻjayev (Conservatives)
 
Last edited:
Chapter Sixteen: the Beijing Agreement (April 1986 Part I)
448421.jpg

(Protests demanding right for emigration for the Soviet Jews)

In response to growing international pressure, in April 1986, Soviet General Secretary Grigory Romanov decided to lift restrictions on Jewish emigration from the Soviet Union. That same year, 71,000 Soviet Jews emigrated, of whom only 12,117 immigrated to Israel. In Vienna, a major transit point for immigration to Israel, some 83% chose to go to the United States. In October 1986, the US government stopped treating Soviet Jews as refugees, as another country, Israel, was willing to accept them unconditionally. However, granting refugee status to Soviet Jews persisted in some form, as the Lautenberg Amendment to the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (Section 599D) required the executive branch to establish refugee processing categories for Jews, Evangelical Christians, Ukrainian Catholics, and Ukrainian Orthodox Church members and give members of these categories an enhanced opportunity to qualify for refugee status. In 1987, 185,227 Soviet immigrants arrived in Israel (out of about 228,400 Jews who left the Soviet Union that year). Approximately 148,000 more Soviet immigrants arrived in Israel in 1988. Immigration to Israel dropped off significantly from then on but remained steady between 1989 and 1992. In 1989, 65,093 Soviet immigrants arrived in Israel, followed by 66,145 in 1990, 68,079 in 1991, and 64,848 in 1994. From then on, Soviet immigration dipped below 60,000 per year for the next few years, though a spike occurred in 1999 when 66,848 immigrants arrived in Israel. This decline continued into the 2000s. Direct flights from the Soviet Union to Israel carrying immigrants took place in May and June 1986. The first direct flight, which carried 125 immigrants, departed Moscow on May 1, 1986.

The abruptness and extensiveness of this immigration wave brought about an immediate severe shortage of housing in Israel, in the Gush Dan area in particular, and a corresponding drastic rise in the prices of residential apartments. As a result, Israel's Minister for Housing Construction, initiated several programs to encourage the construction of new residential buildings, which partly included the concession of different planning procedures. When those resources were inadequate to the growing immigration wave, and many immigrants remained lacking a roof, within two years about 430 caravan sites were set up across Israel, comprising 27,000 caravans. The largest caravan site was founded in Beersheba, consisting of 2,308 housing units. After that period, the immigrants dissipated throughout Israel. But this immigration wave exhibited a phenomenon common to previous Israeli immigration waves: the efforts of the state to transfer the immigrants to the periphery primarily affected immigrants of lower socio-economic status, while those from higher socio-economic levels, who had the resources to resist these efforts, moved to residential areas of their own choice instead, mostly in Gush Dan. (Additional cities to which many of the immigrants moved (willingly and unwillingly) were Haifa and the Krayot urban area, Petah Tikva, Ariel and Ashdod).

Abrams-3.jpg

(Soviet Jews arriving to Israel)

The absorption laws changed with time. The basic government grants given to each immigrant changed rapidly from the late 1980s to the late 1990s. Most of the immigrants initially located on the periphery and later dispersed to the "Russian" neighborhoods. There were cities, mainly in the medium and lower socio-economic levels, in which immigrants constituted over 50% of all the residents. Many of the immigrants integrated into the Israeli labor market, but the majority remained confined in their own communities. The closed nature of this immigration wave may have been due to its large size, which resulted in neighborhoods of sometimes tens of thousands of people. Also, many immigrants failed to adapt to the receiving society and the society's expectancy that they change to facilitate their social absorption. Many of the new immigrants found that their former education was not recognized by many Israeli employers, though it was recognized by institutions of higher education. Many had to work in jobs which did not match their expertise, or undergo retraining. Some of the immigrants chose to stick to the strategy of dissimilation, keeping the originating culture and rejecting the absorbing culture. Other groups of immigrants (the political leadership and younger people) chose to stick with the strategy of intertwining, involving themselves in the surrounding culture while conserving their original culture. These strategic choices were different from those of the previous immigration waves, which commonly chose either to assimilate, rejecting the originating culture and welcoming the absorbing culture, or to intertwine. The immigrants' Israeli-born children, however, have completely assimilated into Israeli society.

Phobos_Marte.jpg

(Soviet Phobos 2 Mars mission)

Following the Black Sea incident, the Soviet government publicly condemned the American lack of respect for Soviet naval laws and demanded an official apology from the White House and President Reagan; nevertheless, the demand was rebuffed by the Americans, as they claimed that the incident happened solely due to the Soviet provocation. Observing the success of the Mir space station, the Soviet government allocated additional funds to the Soviet space program. The additional funds were redistributed towards the following space-related projects:
  • the Phobos program;
  • projects focused on the exploration of Venus and Mars;
  • joint space projects with allied states;
  • projects dedicated to finding water on the moon;
  • Soviet space plane;
  • the Energia/Buran shuttle program;
  • the Zenit-2 rocket;
  • the anti-SDI Polyus spacecraft;
  • a dedicated cargo pod for the Energia rocket;
  • development of satellites;
  • further development of GLONASS.

2z91j68au2291.jpg

(Emancipation of the Soviet women lead to break with old Soviet traditions)

Another step in reorganizing the Soviet state and building modern socialist society was a true emancipation of Soviet women, and to truly make them free and equal to men. The Soviet government began a campaign to promote increased female participation in Soviet cultural, scientific and political life. Furthermore, a propaganda campaign emphasizing the role of women in the October Revolution was started. A commission of prominent women to address the issue of sexism within the USSR was also established. The works of Alexandra Kollontai became mandatory reading in schools across the Soviet Union. Additionally, the Soviet government expanded the child care to free up women on the Soviet job market. Adequate birth control and sex education began to be taught in Soviet secondary schools.

computer.jpg

(Early days of the Soviet IT industry)

Uskorenie (acceleration) was a slogan and a policy announced by Communist Party General Secretary Grigory Romanov on 2 April 1986 at a Soviet Party Plenum, aimed at the acceleration of political, social and economic development of the Soviet Union. The basis for the acceleration policy was the twelfth five-year plan, which included:
  • scientific developments in all Soviet Socialist Republics;
  • modernization and automation of factories;
  • expansion of computer production;
  • expansion of the consumer goods manufacturing sector;
  • anti-black market policies;
  • increased worker’s self-management at the local level;
  • improvement of modern technological standards;
  • automation of the Soviet industry;
  • construction of semiconductor and microchip factories.

China-Cartoon.jpg

(Sino - Soviet relations in the nutshell)

After a series of tough and long negotiations in Beijing between the Soviet and Chinese delegations, the USSR and China reached an agreement, which would result in: normalization of diplomatic relations, large increase in trade, construction of pipelines from Siberia to China. The main points of agreement between the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China included:
  • withdrawal of Vietnamese troops from Cambodia, cessation of China's help to Khmer rebels, establishment of a new neutral socialist government, including a pro-Chinese faction in power
  • Soviet mediation in Sino-Vietnamese and Sino-Indian border disputes;
  • Mongolia remains in the Soviet sphere, but the Soviet troops would leave Mongolia;
  • reduction of the number of Soviet and Chinese troops in the Far East;
  • recognition of Taiwan as a part of China;
  • recognition of the Chinese path to socialism;
  • Soviet military and economic aid to China;
  • USSR gains mining rights in China;
  • joint investment zones (Irkutsk Oblast in the USSR, Wuhan Province in China).
Nevertheless, due to American diplomatic and economic pressure, China refused to reach any agreement with the USSR in regard to Afghanistan, so the current status quo remains in place for the time being.
 
Last edited:
Vasily Kuznetsov, Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, due to his health problems, decided to retire. Now, the position of Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet (which is de-facto Soviet head of state) is vacant. Please write down who should fill in the position of the new Soviet head of state?
 
Vasily Kuznetsov, Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, due to his health problems, decided to retire. Now, the position of Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet (which is de-facto Soviet head of state) is vacant. Please write down who should fill in the position of the new Soviet head of state?
Usubaliev. He's part of the Old Guard like Kuznetsov was, and his Kyrgyz heritage will be a good way to show the world the Soviet Union's nature as a multinational state
 
Last edited:
Top