Addendum: Character Portraits, Part I.
  • I know that @King of Danes was asking for some portraits of new characters entering into the narrative... primarily those born in the 1510s/1520s who aren't OTL and don't necessarily have OTL portraits. I've went through the trouble of making some portraitures for the various kingdoms around Europe. Given the amount of images, will be splitting this into two posts.

    England (House of Tudor / Oldenburg):
    cd9Gy3r.jpeg
    O9UDB9r.jpeg

    Queen Mary & King John II.

    Scotland (House of Stewart):

    lQYBjAk.jpeg
    JAKRUba.jpeg

    King Alexander IV & Queen Charlotte of Scotland.

    7qDWknM.jpeg

    Catherine Stuart, Countess of Boulogne & Viscountess of Thouars.


    Burgundy & Bohemia (House of Habsburg, Burgundian Branch):
    xXx4mzw.jpeg
    AkEJVPt.jpeg

    King Maximilian & Queen Elisabeth of Bohemia.

    France (House of Valois):
    Pf23u99.jpeg
    0M7dfl1.jpeg

    Dauphin François & Dauphine Isabelle.

    74QqkTb.jpeg

    Françoise Fébé, Princess of Navarre.
     
    Addendum: Character Portraits, Part II.
  • Spain (House of Habsburg, Spanish Branch):
    ieBYdlF.jpeg
    E2a1qb6.jpeg

    Prince Fernando Alonso & Princess Beatriz of Portugal, his wife.

    Portugal (House of Aviz):
    vjeWewN.jpeg
    MfdbYXL.jpeg

    Crown Prince Carlos & Crown Princess Maria Isabel.

    Rc380Ja.jpeg

    Princess Maria of Portugal, Duchess of Viseu.


    Poland & Lithuania (House of Jagiellon):
    UPvK1OR.jpeg
    WEs1FVu.jpeg

    King Sigismund II & Queen Maria of Poland.

    6M36Woy.jpeg
    5DVfawX.jpeg

    Prince Alexander of Poland and his wife, Margarete of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 37. Pornocratie Française – The Last Years of François Ier
  • I've got another bit of a long one for you guys, and hoping you enjoy the last bit of François Ier's reign!

    Chapter 37. Pornocratie Française – The Last Years of François Ier
    1542-1547; France.

    “The final years of the reign of perhaps one of France’s greatest kings was crowned not in glory, but instead shrouded in ignominy… a once young and virile king grew weak and decrepit, surrounded by a court of vice and decadence… factions vied for political influence… while the king’s greatest whore, older and corpulent from her undisputed challenge faced the greatest rival of her own life… a prettier whore, from her own line…”
    — Honoratus a Santa Balbina, Histoire de la cour de François Ier


    Musical Accompaniment: Le premier jour du mois de mai

    450px-French_School_Portrait_of_Francis_I_of_France_c._1530.jpg

    François Ier, King of France; Ecole Française, c. 1530.

    The last years of François’ reign in France proved to be some of the most colorful of his reign, perhaps even more colorful than the escapades of his earliest years. While some historians entangle the final years of François’ reign with the Italian War of 1542-44 and its subsequent peace, the war played a minor role in the escapades of the French court. Eighteenth-century historians branded the final period of François’ reign as the Pornocratie Française or the French Pornocracy—alluding to the Saeculum Obscurum in Papal History, occasionally known as the Rule of Harlots. 1542 has often been seen as the definitive beginning of the French Pornocracy—and all roads lead to the woman who had played a vital role in French history of the period since her ascension to the position of the king’s maîtresse-en-titre—Anne Boullan, the Duchess of Plaisance. Though the duchess’s physical relationship with the king had ceased nearly two years before, she had done her best to keep the virile king satiated—mainly through minor lovers that Anne procured herself and housed in tiny houses outside the confines of court that became known as her jardins. Though all had worked swimmingly for nearly two years, Anne could not help but fear for her position. “Two years of foisting lovers upon the king had greatly affected the duchess,” one of Anne’s ladies wrote in a letter to her friend. “At thirty-five, she was getting older… she had put on weight since her last miscarriage in 1540 and greatly feared what the allure of some stupid little girl spreading her legs for the king might do. By 1542, she couldn’t take anymore—she resolved that the Jardins must close and find a replacement lover for the king—one that would be loyal to her and would not seek to usurp her position.”

    Anne Boullan was a Frenchwoman through and through, but she did not trust any French trollop to take her place in the king’s bed. “She bedecked herself as any French whore might,” Secundiano Obisi, an Italian antiquarian who resided in France, wrote. “But beneath the veneer of her fripperies, she remained an Englishwoman in her heart of hearts.” Anne had decided that a more permanent solution to her problem must be found in England. “I hope that this letter finds you in good spirits,” An innocuous letter from Anne began, dated 1542 and addressed to her step-grandmother, the Dowager Duchess of Norfolk. “I must confess that I have grave concerns within my household—I have dismissed two attendants in the last few months for thieving silver…. Frenchwomen, of course! As I grow older, I realize that there are none I truly trust except for an Englishwoman… who are undoubtedly the most honest of all races. I know you have cared for many poor wards within your home, including our family. I wish you could recommend one who might be willing to enter my service. In return, I promise to care for upkeep and secure a good marriage for her when the time is right. I shall take care of the dowry.” When the letter reached the Dowager Duchesses’ hand, she had a perfect candidate for her step-granddaughter: Catherine Howard, another granddaughter in her care. A poor relation of the Howard family, she had spent her adolescence as a hanger-on in the Dowager Duchess of Norfolk’s household. With no dowry, she had no prospects of her own—and in 1540, she was passed over for the position of Maid of Honor in Queen Mary’s household in favor of a sister of one of the queen’s close associates. France seemed like Catherine’s answer for the Dowager Duchess: Anne had succeeded there, beyond all measure, had she not? Just as Anne’s sister had married well, while her brother was a duke and wed to the daughter of Cesare Borgia. Yes—France it was.

    Catherine Howard received word of her good fortune in the spring of 1542. “They say that Catherine is to go to France…” a gossipy letter from one of Catherine’s associates read. “I’ve heard that she is to go to serve her cousin, the Duchess of Plasance[sic], while others say it is a ruse and that she intends to retire to a nunnery because she is pregnant…” Regardless of the rumors, Catherine received a modest allowance of £75 to pay for her expenses to travel to France. Catherine Howard left England via Portsmouth in April of 1542--accompanied by her brother, Sir Charles Howard. “Kitty has been amazed since we arrived in the port,” Charles wrote in a letter to their younger brother, George. “She could scarcely believe the size of the ships nor the comfort of the feather bed in which she had slept the night before.” Catherine and Charles departed England aboard a Dutch merchant ship, the Fladern, which carried the pair to Le Havre. “We reached Le Havre with little trouble,” Charles wrote. “The port does not quite compare to the size of London’s wharves, but Kitty has been amazed nevertheless…” From Le Havre, Catherine and her brother traveled to Anne Boullan’s country residence—the Château de la Jatte located near Neully, built upon the Île de la Jatte within the Seine River. A masterpiece of French Renaissance architecture, the château was known for its blue roof and four towers constructed at each corner of the castle—as well as the fact that it could only be reached by boat. Charles and Catherine reached Anne’s château in May 1542—two months before the Italian War of 1542 broke out. Charles stayed briefly and wrote his final letter to his brother on his return to England: “All is now in God’s hands… Kitty is safely deposited where she is needed, and now we can only hope she will succeed.” For perhaps the first time in her life, Catherine had a bedchamber to herself—and soon wondered what sort of servant she might be to her older, elusive cousin.

    anneboleyn3.jpg

    Anne Boullan, the Duchess de Plaisance, c. 1540; AI Generated.

    On her first morning, the duchess ensured that her young cousin had a scented bath—of rosewater and lemon—before she formally was introduced to Anne. “Her little cousin was like a scared little goat,” one of Anne’s ladies tittered in a letter to a friend. “Deposited right in front of her new mistress, I firmly believe she knew not what to say. The duchess proffered her hand—only after a moment did the young girl finally obey, curtseying near the ground and kissing her cousin’s hand. Only then did the duchess allow etiquette to lapse, raising the girl to her feet as she kissed both cheeks. ‘Ma cousine chérie… how good it is to finally meet you!’ the duchess exclaimed before she bade her to forget all etiquette and to call her Anne. The little cousin tittered and giggled, her cheeks flushed as she stated that her name was Catherine, but those who knew her best called her Kitty. What a name! Can you truly believe it?” Anne’s first business matter was her name: no girl named Kitty could seduce the king. Such a name was for a strumpet or streetwalker, not a petit maîtresse of François of France. “Here, you shall be called something else,” Anne stated as if she were the queen on high. “Elegance is in your blood, for you are a Howard. Kitty will not do, but Catherine will suit you just fine.” And so, Catherine Howard—young Kitty—received her baptism from the Duchess of Plaisance.

    From the name, other matters were of great importance. Catherine’s wardrobe, including a few well-worn gowns, was deposed. Anne wasted no time ordering Catherine a new wardrobe from Paris—complete with a small collection of jewels and perfumes—worth some £10,000 altogether. Anne wished to ensure her young cousin would be as perfumed and coiffed as any lady of the French court—and a catch that François would be unwilling to pass up. All while Anne prepared, she wrote letters to the king, informing him of the progress of what was known as the present. “All continues well,” Anne wrote in a letter to François from November 1542. “I hope I have the salve which shall soothe all your present troubles—the odious Pitauds and this terrible war. Your present is coming along nicely, and I ask only that you be patient… for it shall be entirely worth it.” Anne had reeled the king into her possible intentions with Catherine—but not the girl she pampered and cosseted. “She is beautiful and very amiable,” Anne wrote in her diary. “She is a bright little thing who lights up every room she enters. Kind and good—she possesses decency towards even the meanest servants that most girls her age would not. Things continue well enough… but unfortunately, her education has been badly neglected. She can read and write and has had some musical training. She is behind many girls her age, but she will master what she needs to, and she shall succeed at court… she is too frivolous to be a scholar, but she is a good dancer. Her mind is empty, but that is no terrible thing—it means she shall fit into my plan without issues.”

    The final lever of the Duchess of Plaisance’s plan was put into motion in April 1543—a little over a year since Catherine’s arrival in France. Anne was honored to formally introduce Catherine Howard before the court at the Château of Chambord. Catherine was introduced to King François and Queen Beatriz—with little idea that she had curtseyed before the man who would change her life. “… it was no secret that the Duchess of Plaisance had some trick under her sleeve to secure her position with the king.” One courtier wrote to a friend. Another member of the court proved more damning: “Boullan has long been a poisonous viper… all can see straight through her. She has long been a whoremonger: I am not surprised that she has now chosen to play the part of a brothel madame… and her own cousin, at that!” It was said that Anne arranged for Catherine to meet the king privately—with her present as a chaperone the night after her introduction. History, however, disagrees somewhat on the details. Did Anne ever confide in Catherine about the reason for bringing her across the channel, or did it remain secret?

    catherinehoward3.jpg

    Catherine Howard, La Petit Boullan, c. 1543; AI Generated.

    Despite Anne’s attacks on Catherine’s mind, she was not a silly girl—she had endured a difficult childhood within the Dowager Duchess of Norfolk’s household—at a young age, she had been preyed upon by her music teacher, who had molested her. Much later, Catherine wrote in her memoirs of the experience: “Being but a young girl, I suffered him at sundry times to handle and touch the secret parts of my body, which neither became me with honesty to permit nor him to require.” This was followed by the attentions of the dowager’s new secretary in 1538, who also pursued her—when she was scarcely fifteen. This relationship allegedly ended because the music teacher, angry at losing his position, had written a poisonous letter to the dowager, who soon discovered the relationship. The Dowager Duchess sent her secretary to Ireland and scolded Catherine severely: “She told me that banqueting at night was not fit for a girl such as myself,” Catherine wrote candidly. “She feared it would hurt my beauty—that was of greater concern than my morals.” Whatever truly happened, Anne Boullan led Catherine like a lamb to the slaughter to the King of France. “The king has been enchanted by his new present,” Anne would write in her diary. “Over and over, he could only exclaim how darling and beautiful this rose was—and how pleased he was now to possess it within his own private garden.”

    Once Catherine was inserted into the royal bed, it did not take long for rumors to flow about the court of the king’s newest paramour. The French court called Catherine le petit Boullan owing to her connection to the Duchess of Plaisance. Unlike the previous lovers that François had possessed since his relationship with Anne had ceased, Catherine had been formally introduced to the court and possessed chambers adjoining her cousin. “Madame de Plaisance was well pleased with this situation,” Fulvie de Savigny, a memoirist and close friend of the duchess, wrote. “She possessed the petit Boullan right under her thumb—able to influence her to do her bidding—or so she thought.” In a blink of an eye, Catherine had been transported from her miserable existence into the glories of the French court—and she enjoyed every moment of it. Even amidst the terrible conflict that France was involved in, François proved generous to his new lover. She was given an allowance of £5000 per annum, but it quickly proved insufficient for her needs as Catherine developed a love for the finer things. By the end of 1543, Catherine’s debts stood at £6500 and threatened to engulf her annual pension. “I was quite silly with money at first,” Catherine again wrote many years later in her memoir. “I had no understanding of its worth, merely that it was given to me to be spent. Milliners, perfumers, seamstresses… all sought out my favor, and I adored it. I lost more sums from gambling and silly card games, but I must confess that it was not all wasted… some sums went to charity, such as towards the church of Saint-Thomas-du-Louvre.” François soon intervened to pay Catherine’s debt and increase her allowance by another £5000—much to Anne’s annoyance. Anne soon learned she had not given the king a lamb to play with—but a viper. For the first time, Anne felt her influence was genuinely under attack, and she turned against Catherine with a vengeance. “All that you have is because of me,” Anne wrote in a venomous letter to her cousin. “I see now that you are no friend, no ally—you are truly the snake in the Garden of Eden, tempting the king with your apple. You would do well to remember who has brought you here and how easily I might send you away.”

    Though peace returned to France in 1545 following the Treaty of Compiègne, all was not well at court as two factions began to spring up, both vying for influence over the king and the royal government. Firstly was the faction of the Duchess of Plaisance—she had long held a grip over François and, by extension, the royal government. Plaisance, a Protestant, counted those closest to the king among her allies, such as his sister, Queen Marguerite of Navarre. Anne had succeeded in engineering further control over the royal government through the disgrace of Anne de Montmorency, the Baron of Montmorency—disgraced and dismissed in 1542. The second faction was centered around Catherine Howard—though she was not an active participant, but rather a figurehead around whom those dissatisfied with French royal policies gathered. This included not only men who were dissatisfied with Anne’s influence, such as François, the Cardinal-Duke of Bourbon, but even Queen Beatriz herself. “The little slut respects me,” Beatriz reportedly uttered. “The big slut does not, and her time must end.” Though François had made steps to maintain the Catholic faith in France, many still believed that he was too close to the foreign Protestants; even if they served as valuable allies, those associated in Catherine’s circle thought it was time for François to cooperate with the emperor in calling for a council to deal with church matters and dealing once and for all with the Protestant cause. In this, they saw Catherine as their pawn: supplant Anne, and the Protestant stink around the king would fade forever. “I knew little of what was going on around me, to be truthful,” Catherine added in her memoirs. “I was young, pretty, and had the affection—I would not say love—of a still handsome king. In 1544, I fell pregnant, and my focus was entirely on that… but I suffered a miscarriage in my fifth month and nearly died in the king’s service. Surprisingly enough, this terrible ordeal caused the king’s esteem for me to grow—he loved that I had nearly died in service to him… a twisted proof of his affection for me. Some whispered that his love for me now certainly exceeded his love for my cousin—she too had been ‘wounded’ in his service, never to love him again. I had survived and returned to his bed soon after.”

    450px-Le_Lit_de_justice_de_Vend%C3%B4me.jpg

    Lit de Justice de Vendôme, c. 1458-1459.

    Even into the 1540s, François championed administrative and financial reforms. François sought to curb the power of provincial governors and to by-pass the moribund financial boards that had thereto handled French royal finances by dividing the kingdom’s provinces up into sixteen Généralités. In Italy, François championed reforms primarily in the Duchy of Milan—where French and Italian jurists combed through civic statutes to harmonize discrepancies. Though the Sforza had long been ghosts amongst the Milanese, François relied heavily upon his Orléans-Visconti heritage to legitimize his rule—and the rule of his descendants that would follow in due time. While François decreed the restoration of Milan’s Senate to replace the General Council as an advisory organ to the Governor of Milan, other reforms reflected France’s centralizing tendencies, as power was vested in the center, weakening the councils of the various communes within the duchy. Milanese trade guilds were reformed along French lines. Similar policies were carried out in Genoa, where, for the first time, its administration was detached from Milan, and a separate governorship was established. Genoa’s city walls were expanded, and François dispersed funds to build a citadel that could be garrisoned by French troops. Some functions of Genoese civic government were also re-established through a council—a lower council of some hundred members, composed of Genoa’s most influential men: bankers, merchants, lawyers, captains, doctors, magistrates, and scholars, who were elected by lot. François also re-established the Senate of Genoa, composed of eighty noblemen appointed by the Governor of Genoa. The Genoese council was limited to publishing laws put forth by the Lord of Genoa and served more as an advisory body—but there was hope its functions would be improved in time. The first meeting of the Genoese council was primarily symbolic: its first edict formally abolished the Republic of Genoa and declared the Lordship of Genoa. The lordship was vested in François by virtue of his position as Duke of Milan and stated that the Duchy of Milan and Lordship of Genoa were to be united in personal union for perpetuity. The second edict proved more substantial, abolishing the Alberghi, or clans in Genoa, as a private institution. In effect, Genoa was transformed under French aegis into an aristocratic oligarchy. A third concern was not Genoa but Corsica—a Genoese possession held by the Bank of Saint George but effectively under French control. France had stationed troops in Corsica dating back to the 1530s, and the island’s government was effectively in the hands of Sampiero Corso, a Corsican colonel in French service. The Treaty of Bastia, signed between representatives of the French crown and the Bank of Saint George, arranged for the bank’s secession of the island into French hands in exchange for a payment of some £400,000.

    Regarding trade and exploration, François had long glowered over the papal treaties that had divided the world—known and unknown into Spanish and Portuguese spheres. “The sun shines for me as it does for others,” François reportedly boasted. “I would very much like to see the clause of Adam’s will by which I should be denied my share of the world.” Though Italy had long been François’s primary focus, it did not mean it was his only one. The 1520s and 1530s had seen François dispatch expeditions westwards. Giovanni da Verrazzano, financed by the king and the city of Lyon, had explored the coasts of the Americas. At the same time, Bertrand d’Ornesan had tried (and failed) to build a trading post in Brazil—attempts by Jacques Cartier and Jean-François de Roberval to settle land in the Americas likewise failed, bogged down by a lack of supplies and financial issues stemming from the Italian War of 1542. Despite this, François proved a prudent builder, creating the port of Le Havre and ordering additions to the ports of Brest and Marseille. Trading efforts proved somewhat more successful—Jean Ango, a Norman shipowner and merchant, was one of the first Frenchmen to attempt to break into the spice trade to challenge Portugal’s monopoly. By 1527, a French ship was recorded as having reached the Indian city of Diu—while one of Ango’s ships reached Sumatra in 1529. Ango’s expedition efforts made significant progress in developing the so-called Dieppe Maps. French traders also traded in the Americas, with Brazil being a favored destination because of its excess of Brazilwood. The French developed beneficial relationships with the natives, as well.

    François’ council had undergone shakeups by 1545; his newest chancellor was François Olivier, who had replaced Guillaume Poyet. Claude d’Annebault also had a prominent role on the committee, where he exerted significant influence over financial matters—while even the Duke of Valentinois, the Duchess of Plaisance’s brother, had been introduced to the council by the end of 1545. All these men proved utterly loyal to the cause of the king’s primary mistress and saw no reason to attempt to upset the balance. Anne had open access to the council and often conferred privately with the Conseil Privé members and other essential government organs. It was said that she occasionally signed decrees and edicts in François’ name—using an ink stamp made from the king’s signature for speedier signing. 1545 represented an actual epoch in French history—for the first time, their influence and position over Italy had been openly recognized by the emperor, who agreed to grant the Duke of Orléans the Duchy of Milan following his marriage. Other secret articles concerned the territories around Parma—which were to be erected into a sovereign duchy for Anne Boullan’s illegitimate son, Octave. Anne proved a champion of the later policy and feared what might happen if the Duke of Orléans—eldest son of Queen Beatriz, inherited Milan. It was little surprise that Beatriz had her own concerns when she learned of the secret protocol attached to the peace treaty regarding Parma: “Once again, she seeks to rob my son of his birthright!” Beatriz reportedly exclaimed. “I have finally been promised hope that my son shall be a sovereign outside of this awful country… but he will lose territory to that trollop’s bastard? Never, never. I have endured enough. I have taken enough! I will bear no more!”

    Chancelier-Francois-Olivier.jpg

    Engraving of François Olivier, Chancellor of France.

    The cabal around Queen Beatriz included men such as Cardinal Tournon, Pietro Strozzi, the Cardinal-Duke of Bourbon, and Jacques de La Brosse. The queen, long known for her passions and dramatics in her marriage, had for the first time turned towards pragmatism to solve her problems—she wished to use young Catherine Howard as a pathway to influence her long philandering husband—back towards Rome and perhaps in hopes of depriving Anne Boullan of the riches she had acquired throughout her long tenure as François’ maîtresse-en-titre. “The queen was surprisingly maternal towards the young whore,” one of the queen’s ladies wrote to her parents. “In return, the little one was always courteous to the queen and respected her estate and position. Her Majesty even went so far as to send her Portuguese physician to tend to the young strumpet when she nearly died due to her miscarriage… she returned to the king’s bed in better shape than before… some whispered that the queen’s doctor had supplied Catherine not only with medicine to restore her health and vitality, but certain potions and lotions that would help restore her fertility…” In 1545, Catherine gave birth to a young daughter named Marie-Françoise. Though many expected the king would acknowledge the child, he instead ordered the young child be baptized at the Church of Saint-Merri in Paris, where the young girl was baptized as Marie-Françoise Barberin, daughter of Pietro Barberin, an Italian condottiere in the king’s service and his wife, Marguerite Gondouin—both non-existent persons who did not indeed exist. François bestowed a pension of £1000 upon the young girl and ordered her placed into the care of a wet nurse. François named two men—Monsieur de Tournay, a notary, and Monsieur Talon, a treasurer of the royal domain as the young girl’s legal guardian. “Few were surprised that the king did not recognize his newest bastard,” a courtier wrote in a gossipy letter back home. “Madame de Plaisance had been in his ear the entire pregnancy, whispering that legitimization or recognition would be a step too far for his petit maîtresse—she reminded him starkly of his duties to her children, and forget the duties to any babe that Catherine might bare.”

    The birth of a child, even one that was sent away, only emboldened Catherine’s faction. They believed that she was on the ascendance: young, virile, and fertile. Everything that the Duchess of Plaisance seemed not to be. “I must confess that I fancied myself greater than I truly was,” Catherine surmised sadly—in a chapter of her memoirs dedicated to the so-called Tumult of the Maîtresses. “Those who surrounded me were those who I thought were my true friends, with true intentions. It would be a lie to say that some part of me did not desire all the riches and glory that were being promised to me… yes, there was a part of me that desired it, for I desired to be someone, but most of all I desired affection that I had long been denied in my short life.” Many felt that King François was turning away from the policies advocated by the Duchess of Plaisance: in 1540, he had codified the Edict of Fontainebleau, which declared Protestantism to be high treason against God and mankind and legalized torture, loss of property, public humiliations, and death against them. In 1545, François went a step further and ordered the Waldensians in Mérindol to be massacred—a joint effort that combined French troops and Papal troops from the Venaissin, augmented by veterans from the Armée d’Italie. The villages of Mérindol and Cabrières were captured, while other neighboring villages were pillaged and destroyed. Thousands of Waldensians were killed, while those who survived were sentenced to forced labor aboard the French galleys. Pope Gelasius III approved of the attack and honored Jean Maynier and Antoine Escalin des Aimars, the attack’s masterminds. “If we are truly to make a move against the great whore Boullan,” one conspirator wrote in a letter to another. “Then our time is now—the little mistress must make her move and stake her claim.”

    Catherine’s downfall as François’ petit maîtresse began in 1546, though some believe it had begun as early as 1545. “Yes, it is true—she had given the king a child,” Pierre de Noyon, a French historian, wrote of the Tumult of the Maîtresses. “But it did not increase her stature, as some believed, but diminished it. Indeed, did Catherine receive anything for the ordeal? Even the Duchess of Plaisance had been rewarded for bearing the king his first bastard. Catherine received nothing—no jewels or money and certainly no influence upon the king’s mind and heart. Rather than representing her youth, the birth of Catherine’s child represented mortality—something the aging king had little desire to dig into.” Catherine, primped and pressed by those who sought to use her, pushed her towards what would be her oblivion. Catherine’s memoirs addressed the situation only in the barest words: “In truth, I cannot recall the exact situation… I know it was a beautiful spring night, and the king had come to my chamber to make love (as he often did). And so, we did. I cannot recall what I said or did…only that darkness covered his face, and I never saw him again. I was sent away the next day.” Perhaps the older and (presumably) wiser Catherine wished to omit her position from a difficult period in her life. Still, sources from the court offered up information that was much more varied and colorful. “His Majesty has finally tired of his little English slut, le petit Boullan,” the Duke of Valentinois wrote in a gossipy letter addressed to the King of Scots. “It has always been a matter of time… my little eyes and ears have told me that after they finished fucking, she threw a tantrum—demanding to be recognized as the king’s mistress and that her daughter should have recognition too…” Another letter proved less colorful—but more candid: “Some say that they fought and argued; in truth, I cannot see it, for the little Anglais was always sunny and never spoke in an outward turn—to either the king or queen. I have heard differently… that once they expired and lay there in bliss, le petit Boullan attempted to put forth a little piece of information… information that came not from her own empty little head but from her friends. Then and there, the king shut his ears to her and decided she must go.”

    650px-Tiziano_-_Amor_Sacro_y_Amor_Profano_%28Galer%C3%ADa_Borghese%2C_Roma%2C_1514%29.jpg

    Sacred & Profane Love; Titian, c. 1514.

    Catherine’s downfall was rapid. In April 1546, in the dead of night, Catherine was roused from her sleep and expelled from her chambers by the royal guards. Firmly repudiated by François, she was to remove herself from court immediately. “It was three, perhaps four in the morning at the earliest,” Catherine recounted in her memoirs. “I was ordered to remove myself from the court and to remove myself to Paris. I was given the dignity to change my clothing for my journey. I proceeded to Paris, shrouded in darkness, at the head of my own funeral cortege. When I arrived, I sheltered in a convent until I received further orders from the king… I was instructed that I was to be married, that my husband had been chosen for me… and that I must obey this command.” Catherine met her husband the next day—Étienne de Rys, the son of a magistrate who sat within the Parlement of Paris. Catherine had no idea, but her husband had been chosen by the Duchess of Plaisance and her inner circle and with great care—someone young, handsome, and with a good name. Having no substantial fortune of his own, Rys agreed to the king’s demand. To make the marriage more palatable to the de Rys family, François decided to provide a dowry of £25,000 disguised as a donation from Catherine’s own family and allowed her to retain all the gifts of clothing and jewelry she had received from the king. The future groom’s anxieties were also soothed with cash—he received £10,000 alone for agreeing to the marriage. The pair were engaged the day following their meeting, and Catherine and Étienne were formally married on April 27, 1546. They were wed in secrecy at the church attached to the Abbey of Saint Geneviève. “On that day, I became Madame de Rys,” Catherine attested in her memoirs. “While there was no love given our forced union, he was kind to me—an excellent first husband and the best I could have wished for.” Anne had succeeded in saving her position—the little mistress was vanquished.

    While she worked on securing and shoring up her own position, Anne also remained focused on the futures of her own daughters. Her eldest daughter, Élisabeth, finally wed her betrothed—François, the Count of Enghien, in 1545, shortly after her eighteenth birthday. Élisabeth enjoyed her position as Countess of Enghien only briefly: less than a year into her marriage, her husband perished in a bizarre incident when the count’s servants had dropped a heavy chest upon him. Anne wasted little time arranging a second marriage for her daughter. In early 1547, Élisabeth would wed Heinrich of Württemberg, the eldest son of the Duke of Württemberg, who remained in exile in Montbéliard. The marriage of Anne’s second daughter, Jacqueline, would be less fraught—she too would marry her betrothed, Gaspard II de Coligny, the Seigneur de Châtillon, also in early 1547. The last year of Anne’s relationship with François was secure, as the king was often in ailing health—Anne’s relationship with the man she had loved for nearly twenty years soon transformed into that of a nurse. François’ health declined quickly following the marriage of his illegitimate daughter Jacqueline, and he was too ill to attend the ceremony. François expired shortly after that, on March 31, 1547. One attendee of the king’s deathbed wrote, “He died complaining about the weight of the crown, which he had first perceived as a gift from God.” François was succeeded by his son, the Dauphin, who was immediately proclaimed François II.

    The young king would immediately be faced with the terms of the Treaty of Compiègne, which would allot the Duchy of Milan to his younger half-brother, the Duke of Orléans—while erecting the Duchy of Parma for his illegitimate half-brother, Octave. “In truth, the young king had reservations regarding the gift of Milan,” a member of the young king’s household wrote plainly. “He feared what the Queen Dowager might get up to outside of France, a woman he had never been on good terms with. But when reminded how fragile the peace with the emperor was, it was agreed that he needed to do so.” Now queen dowager, Beatriz decamped to the Hôtel de Cluny in Paris to complete her forty-day seclusion—with her son, Philippe Emmanuel, and her young daughter Marie in tow. François II used this delay to his advantage—he immediately named Octave, who would soon become known as Ottavio di Angolemme, as Duke of Parma, which would include the city of Piacenza and its environs, with Anne to serve as his regent until he came of age. “Anne Boullan—long the power behind the throne in France now faced an uncertain future as regent for her young son in Italy,” one historian wrote. “She was given a forty-day reprieve to leave France and enter her son’s new territory, an even greater height as her son would be a sovereign lord—albeit under French protection. She had been given a forty-day reprieve to accept the territory, but she could not help but wonder how she might deal with the queen dowager, her mortal foe—who in due course would be just across a border from her, without François’ protection.”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 38. The Bruderkrieg / War of the League of Mühlhausen
  • Chapter 38. The Bruderkrieg / War of the League of Mühlhausen
    1545-1548; Germany.

    “Thus, we shall judge the emperor in this case, not to be the emperor, but a soldier and mercenary of the Pope.”
    — Martin Luther


    Musical Accompaniment: Vecchie Letrose

    700px-Deutschland_im_XVI._Jahrhundert_%28Putzger%29.jpg

    Map of the Holy Roman Empire, 1547.

    The seeds for the War of the League of Mühlhausen, better known as the Bruderkrieg in German, were laid in the aftermath of the Italian War of 1542-44 through the Treaty of Compiègne. Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, had conceded to the Protestants on some matters to prosecute the war, but many were fearful of his true intentions in the aftermath. Soon after the end of the war, Charles entered negotiations with Pope Gelasius III to open a general church council in Bologna (which received tepid support from François), along with a secret promise to provide funding should war break out against the Protestants. In the east, Charles negotiated a truce with the Ottomans. The Truce of Adrianople forced Charles and his son Maximilian to recognize Ottoman control over Hungary. In return, they were allowed to retain western and northern districts in Hungary that had rallied to Elisabeth of Bohemia—in exchange for a yearly payment of ƒ30,000. This breathing room also allowed Charles to reaffirm his ties to Catholic princes within the empire: the Duchy of Saxony, once held by the steadfastly Protestant Heinrich the Pious, had been succeeded in 1541 by his sole surviving son, Severin—who had been reared as a Catholic at the imperial court. In 1545, Severin married Anna Gennara of Savoy, the emperor’s niece. Martin Luther, a man in failing health, was the sole glue that held the Protestant camp together.

    Luther, who had begun suffering from ill health in the 1530s, passed away in February 1546. He was interned in the Schlosskirche in Wittenberg at the front of the pulpit. With his death, the last restraint upon the Protestant Princes was lifted: no longer would they need to listen to Luther’s moral and legal reasons to avoid war with the emperor, nor his entreaties that they should resist his demands. For the League of Mühlhausen, they saw a dangerous foe in the emperor, a man who had never kept his word to them. They had no interest in attending the new Papal council that would soon open. Rather than be caught unaware, members of the League agreed to meet at Saalfeld in July 1546 to decide how they would respond militarily to the emperor. “The emperor has greater resources, that is true,” Philip of Hesse argued before the meeting of the princes. “But we are of quicker wit… we can mobilize our forces quicker than the emperor can raise his. We must strike—deal a preventative blow before he can quash us beneath his feet.” At Saalfeld, the Protestants decided that the emperor must be struck down as quickly as possible. They relied upon Luther’s idea of a Beerwolf—that the emperor had violated the political contract between himself and the princes, giving them the right to take military action. The spark that lit the fires of war began in Hesse when Protestant troops occupied the city of Gersfeld—a Catholic city attached to the territories of the Princely Abbey of Fulda. “They wasted little time in pillaging the city,” one historian wrote of the early days of the conflict. “They looted the homes of the residents, but their greatest travesty was Gerfeld’s church… the troops stripped it of its Catholic ornaments. Afterward, they hosted a bonfire, forcing the citizenry to watch as the so-called relics of idolatry were burnt.”

    News of this atrocity soon reached the emperor, who had taken up residence once more in Brussels. He conferred with his counsellors, who at this epoch included Nicholas Perrenot, Arianitto Comène—known also as Arianitto Cominato—Viglius van Ayatta, and Louis of Praet. The imperial council urged a proactive response to the crisis, believing that this represented a chance for Charles to deal a militant blow against the Protestant Princes. “His Majesty has decided to place an imperial ban upon the league,” Empress Renée wrote in a letter to her confidant, Michelle Saubonne. “He intends to march against them… I am twisted in knots… a traitor to my faith if I am silent, a traitor to my husband if I speak. I must suffer in silence and hope for better days.” Renée and Charles’ relations had cooled down by the 1540s following the birth of their last child. There were tensions from their clashing personalities and Renée’s growing faith, which she kept a secret. In 1545, the Inquisitor General of the Low Countries, Ruard Tapper, questioned several of her servants. Several of Renée’s French servants were found to possess Protestant tracts and were proclaimed guilty of heresy. Tapper, a lenient man who believed that spiritual issues needed spiritual solutions, imposed penances upon those guilty. Clément Marot, Renée’s secretary, formally abjured his Protestant faith—but died shortly after, some believed from shock. The scandal forced Charles to intervene. He banished Anne’s French servants, who were ordered to return to France despite Renée’s fierce protestations. When Charles ordered Renée’s own chambers searched, it was discovered that she used a secret compartment within one of her chests to hide not only Protestant tracts but letters that she had received from Jean Calvin and Philip Melanchthon, which made clear her steadfast faith. “We shall deal with this matter in due course,” Charles allegedly uttered coldly to Renée when her secret was discovered. Charles sternly ordered Renée to retire to Mechelen, where she was given the former residence of Margaret of York, the Hof van York. Renée was also forbidden to take the children: Charles retained custody of their three daughters, Anne, Adélaïde, and Michèle, as well as their two sons, Charles, and Jean. This meant an effective end to their relationship and marriage; never again would Charles and Renée live under the same roof. For now, the emperor had a greater focus than his heretic wife—he commanded none to speak of it.

    severinus.jpg

    Severinus/Severin, Duke of Saxony; AI Generated.

    Charles brought together an army of some 50,000 men—this included not only 25,000 Germans but some 15,000 troops from the Low Countries, and some 15,000 men loaned to him: comprised of 10,000 English troops under the personal command of King John. Prince Ferdinand promised some 5,000 men—remnants of the force that had invaded Naples, but their arrival was uncertain. Charles’ son also pledged to provide some 13,000 troops from Bohemia if needed. In July 1546, Charles formally placed both Philip of Hesse and Johann Friedrich of Saxony under an imperial ban, relating to their actions in Wölfenbuttel, where they had deposed the duke, Heinrich V. Charles was able to gather his army with relatively little trouble at Leuven. The emperor was aided in this by Duke Severin of Saxony, who used the support of Maximilian in Bohemia to initiate an invasion of the Electorate of Saxony in October 1546. “I have given the duke all the aid that he desires,” Maximilian wrote in a letter to his father. “The diet has not exactly been as liberal with funding as I have hoped—but we shall render all the aid he needs to succeed.” Johann Friedrich was soon forced to abandon his position in Hesse to return to Saxony, where he succeeded in liberating his territories. By the fall, Johann Friedrich launched a counterattack into the Albertine Saxon lands held by Duke Severin and the adjacent lands within the Kingdom of Bohemia. As the weather turned colder and snow coated the empire, campaigning stopped for the year. Charles wintered in Mainz with his nephew John. “There is naught but ice and snow everywhere we look,” John wrote in a letter to Mary. “We have been in Mainz for nearly a fortnight now, and a terrible storm rolled through overnight. The city is covered in snow, a frozen idol awaiting the warmth of spring. Continue to care for yourself and our children; I was most gladdened to hear in your last letter that little York and Somerset continue to thrive, and that Isabella has recovered from her fever.”

    Campaigning resumed in early 1547. Charles was able to capture several Lutheran imperial cities, such as Frankfurt. Some princes that supported the League of Mühlhausen, such as Duke Ulrich of Württemberg and Friedrich II, the Count Palatine of the Rhine, chose to submit to the emperor rather than fight. Imperial forces moved quickly into the domains of Philip of Hesse, where the Hessian troops were dealt a brutal blow at the Battle of Gießen. “Gießen marked a drastic change in the ambitions of Philip of Hesse,” one 18th-century historian wrote in his treatise about the Bruderskrieg. “Imperial troops had rapidly overrun his domains, and the landgrave had no choice but to throw himself before the emperor. Emperor Charles V granted the rebel an interview near Laubach; he begged plainly for mercy: that his domains were to remain intact and that he should be freed. The emperor thought differently and ordered the landgrave to be closely confined. He was eventually transferred to the citadel near Namur, where he would await his fate…” The collapse of the Hessian forces dealt a significant blow to Johann Friedrich’s position and the League’s. “Johann Friedrich hoped vainly that the Bohemian Protestants might rise up and aid his cause,” another historian wrote. “He discovered quickly that the Bohemians, with their rights protected and affirmed under their new king, had no interest in joining a rebel movement that was fast losing steam.” By April 1547, imperial troops had reached Saxony—joined by men from the Duke of Severin’s army. Johann Friedrich’s troops came to rest Köttlitz—he had divided his army, with a significant amount dispatched to prevent Bohemian soldiers from joining the imperial army. He had also expended an incredible amount of manpower to garrison cities and towns in southern Saxony—leaving only a small number of troops to cover the Elbe River, which he considered too significant for the imperial army to cross.

    450px-Page135_Die_Gemahlin_des_gefangenen_Kurf%C3%BCrsten_Johann_Friedrich_des_Gro%C3%9Fm%C3%BCthigen_vor_Kaiser_Karl_V.jpg

    Mercy after the Battle of Gießen, Engraving.

    Charles first reached the Elbe River on the evening of May 4, 1547. Many of his generals, such as the Prince of Orange, cautioned the emperor against engaging Saxon troops on the other side. On the other hand, John, the King of England, argued that he needed to take drastic action to take the Saxons by surprise. The following day, several members of the advance guard of the imperial army looked for a way to cross the Elbe. “The guards along the Elbe proved a thorn in the emperor’s side—should they be alerted or know of the imperial crossing; all advantage would be lost.” In the twilight of the following day, before the sun had risen, the emperor ordered part of the imperial advance guard to advance to find a way to cross. Small groups of troops swam across the river, taking the Saxon guards by surprise under the cover of darkness. Meanwhile, John used the help of a local farmer to find a place within the river that would allow the whole army to ford through the river—while English longbowmen, in one of the final battles they participated in, helped prevent the destruction of a pontoon bridge. This allowed the imperial cavalry to pass safely across to the shore. The entire army finished its crossing by late afternoon—with Johann Friedrich completely unaware.

    The Battle of Köttlitz broke out on the evening of May 5, 1547. Of Charles’ entire army, he possessed some 25,000 men—including his Burgundian and German levies, English troops under John, and a small contingent of Hungarian cavalry sent by Maximilian that had bypassed the Saxon guards. Johann Friedrich’s army of 11,000 consisted primarily of peasant levies, but they were prepared to stand their ground and fight for their faith. Charles suffered an attack of gout on the day of battle—he was carried to the battlefield in a litter but extorted his troops: “We fight for the true faith—our holy mother church!” The first cavalry assaults were led by King John of England—including his English cavalry and the Hungarian sortie the emperor had placed under his command. “John II of England rode forth gloriously,” Charles Wriothesley wrote in his chronicle. “A ghost has risen from Thérouanne; the young king continued where his predecessor had started. The Hungarians failed in the first charge, and the young king was nearly hit—a stray shot merely grazing his ear. The king commanded the right flank, comprised of the finest English cavalry… a second charge against the Protestant’s weaker flank helped the king deliver victory—and the field, to the emperor. Cries of ‘For St. George! For England!’ mingled with those praising the emperor in French and German amongst sundry other tongues…” The battle proved a complete rout—the enemy troops were scattered into the woodworks, and Johann Friedrich, the Elector of Saxony, was soon taken prisoner, having been wounded in the face. When news of his victory was delivered to the emperor, he had only one thing to say: “Je suis venu, j’ai vu, Dieu a vaincu.” John and his English forces would depart from Germany following this final victory—returning home to England by the end of 1547.

    Imprisoned, Johann Friedrich was now at the emperor’s mercy. Condemned in a court-martial, the elector was sentenced to death. Johann’s wife, Sybille of Cleves, still held Wittenberg and was prepared to defend the city to her last breath. As the imperial army was prepared to lay siege to the Saxon capital, Johann Friedrich was offered an option to receive a reprieve. Johann Friedrich signed the Capitulation of Wittenburg in June 1547—resigning the electoral dignity to Duke Severin of Saxony as well as a significant portion of his territories, leaving Johann with only a piece of the Ernestine lands around Gotha, Weimar, and Coburg. In signing the agreement, Johann Friedrich’s punishment was commuted to a life sentence, and he to be imprisoned in Namur alongside Philip of Hesse. “Wittenberg, the cradle of the Reformation, fell easily enough in the hands of the imperial forces.” Andreas Chyträus wrote of the fall of Wittenburg. “Duke Severin of Saxony was formally granted the electoral dignity at Wittenberg Castle, and a celebratory Catholic mass was held shortly after that—perhaps the first in twenty years in Wittenberg.” Saxony’s realignment meant that one more secular elector joined the Catholic camp—leaving the Count Palatine as the sole Protestant. The fall of Wittenberg into the hands of the Catholic party was a profound shock that caused many reformers to lament. The Prince of Orange, one of the emperor’s imperial commanders, suggested Martin Luther be disinterred from his resting place in the Schlosskirche. However, Charles dissuaded him: “He is dead; there is no reason to disturb him now.”
    600px-Franz_von_Lenbach_Kaiser_Karl_V_%28nach_Tizian%29_1868_Sammlung_Schack.jpg

    Emperor Charles V at Köttlitz; Titian, painted c. 1548.

    The League of Mühlhausen essentially collapsed following Johann Friedrich’s defeat. Some holdouts in northern Germany remained, and imperial troops under the command of Eric II, Prince of Calenberg, were ordered to deal with them. He had support from the Hanseatic City of Lübeck, which contributed significantly to the imperial victory at the Battle of Adendorf, which allowed imperial authority to flourish in northern Germany once Calenberg’s army occupied Bremen. The Bruderkrieg, which had begun with a boom, now ended in a small whimper. The city of Magdeburg, one of the last remaining holdouts against the emperor, conceded to imperial demands and agreed to pay the fines that would be levied against the city. “Charles V emerged victorious from the Bruderkrieg,” one historian would write. “But the Protestant faith was a pandora’s box—twenty years past, it was far too late to push it back into the box. But Charles, often hounded and suffering losses during his time as emperor, had succeeded where his grandfather and forefathers had failed—he had secured a victory over the princes who oft stood in the way of change… giving the emperor a unique chance to secure his position—both for himself and for the House of Habsburg.” Not long after securing his victory over the Protestants, Charles called for an imperial diet to be assembled at Augsburg. Rather than returning to the Low Countries, Charles declared that he would settle in Innsbruck to await the start of the diet. Refurbishments were ordered to the Innsbruck Hofburg.

    The Diet of Augsburg opened in 1548—while known in some circles as the Diet of Reforms, others derided it as the Iron Diet due to the tense atmosphere that pervaded inside it—primarily because of the emperor’s military force that controlled the diet from the outside. Aside from Charles, Maximilian and Elisabeth attended the diet, allowing Charles to meet his daughter-in-law for the first time. “His Majesty was the perfect gentleman,” one courtier wrote. “It was as if he was twenty years younger and speaking with his beloved Mary yet again.” The diet opened with routine business: Charles announced plans for Maximilian’s election as King of Romans, with the election to be held in the next year in Frankfurt. From there, Charles asked that his chancellor read his intentions for the diet and the empire: articles that would become known as the Reformatio Imperii. The first options were primarily administration: part one concerned the Reichsregiment, which was to be reformed into the Fürstenregiment, a princely council based in Brussels that would be given some distinct organizational functions for the first time. Compared to the Reichsregiment of Maximilian’s time, the Fürstenregiment was to be dominated by the emperor, who would not only serve as chairman but hold final approval for all decisions made by the Fürstenregiment. Secondly, Charles called for the Geheimer Pfennig to be permanently levied to fund the Fürstenregiment alongside the Kammerzieler, which paid for the Imperial Chamber Court and the Römermonat concerning collections for the imperial army. Like the previously mentioned tax, the imperial treasurer would handle the disbursement of the funds, with collections to be handled through the imperial circles.

    woodcut-of-the-imperial-diet-of-1548-known-as-the.jpg

    Woodcut of the Diet of Augsburg, 1548—Soldiers stand prepared behind the emperor; AI Generated.

    Other reforms were financial—mint regulations to help introduce economic parity between the different parts of Germany, standardize the coinage and help prevent debasement. Expansion of the Imperial postal service was ordered, with additional routes planned throughout Germany to truly connect the imperial capital in Brussels to the rest of the empire. Others were administrative—such as the reorganization of the Burgundian Imperial Circle to include the Duchy of Guelders, the County of Zutphen, and the territories of Utrecht, Groningen, Overjissel, and the County of Drenthe. The whole Burgundian inheritance and its expanded territories would be covered for the first time in one imperial circle. The Low Countries would remain attached to the Imperial Chamber Court’s jurisdiction and pay taxes equivalent to two electorates. Its war taxes would be comparable to three electorates. The final and most important reforms that Charles considered as part of his program concerned the territorial makeup within the empire, but primarily considering his own hereditary domains. The Reformatio Imperii decreed changes in the electoral challenge—Bohemia was to lose its electoral vote within the Electoral College; in exchange, the kingdom’s unique position and connection to the empire would be recognized as an imperial dependency—which came along with freedom from future imperial laws. One attendee wrote: “All waited for bated breath as the archchancellor spoke… his droning voice as he degreed that Bohemia’s vote—already in the hands of the House of Habsburg would instead pass to Burgundy…”

    The most significant changes concerned the Burgundian inheritance in the Low Countries. In decreeing the transfer of the Bohemian vote to Burgundy, the Reformatio Imperii revived the use of a title already used by the Holy Roman Emperors—that of the so-called Kingdom of Burgundy, sometimes known as the Kingdom of Arles, that had existed in Provence. This kingdom would be spun off as an electorate, now to contain the Burgundian inheritance in the Low Countries—thus shifting Bohemia’s vote onto Burgundy. As part of the electoral inheritance law, this act helped further centralize the Burgundian Low Countries, ensuring they would remain together and be inherited by a single person. Another section concerned the Privilegium Maius that had allegedly made Austria an Archduchy—with Charles decreeing the children of his line would bear the title of Prince/Princess of Burgundy ahead of that of Archduke/Archduchess of Austria. Other changes concerned territorial adjustments for those of proven loyalty: Saxony, as mentioned, had passed to Severin, who had reduced the former electoral line to a tiny cluster of land. Brandenburg was allowed to absorb several districts within its domains—though not Magdeburg. Other victors were the spiritual electors and certain ecclesiastical principalities—which saw organizations of lands and territories within their favor, to make them stronger redoubts of the Catholic faith—while also increasing imperial power through the Concordat of Aix-la-Chapelle. The last statements concerned religion, and the Archchancellor was apparent as he spoke: “The emperor asks that the Protestants behave quietly and cause no trouble; he is prepared to recognize their married clergy and the laity to receive communion of both kinds. He asks that the Protestants prepare a delegation to attend the Council of Bologna as soon as possible. If reconciliation is not truly possible, then the emperor is willing to be magnanimous in his reforms.” Some could not help but genuinely wonder—what exactly did that mean?
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 39. Vivat Regina
  • All I can say about this chapter is that a lot of ya'll are about to be real mad at me. I dedicate this chapter to @mickeymouse who served as my very secret keeper. She knew about this chapter + outcome for several months... I had this planned about twenty chapters ago. I apologize to those I might have gassed up and misled, but hope that you remain entertained and keep reading!

    Chapter 39. Vivat Regina
    1545-1549; England.

    “In a world of kings, I stood tall as a queen.”
    — Queen Mary of England


    Musical Accompaniment: Purge Me, O Lord

    600px-The_Family_of_Henry_VII_with_St_George_and_the_Dragon_%28cropped%29.jpg

    Henry VII and his family; c. 1505.

    England, at the end of 1544, stood at the edge of greatness—the injuries of her previous conflict against France had been healed, and England had come out on top with their reconquest of Boulogne. Combined with the revision of Imperial territory, the Pale of Calais is now greatly enlarged. Mary and John stood among Europe’s most remarkable monarchs, perhaps not as their equals but as something close enough. England through the 1540s had seen various periods of Mary reigning on her own, as John dealt with problems abroad—in 1542-1543, he spent time abroad dealing with troubles in Schleswig-Holstein, while later campaigns in 1547-1548 would take him into Germany to campaign against the Protestants alongside the emperor. Because of this, Mary spent significant periods reigning without her husband. Though John would leave an indelible mark upon England, Mary would be remembered for her strength and determination as a queen regnant in a world dominated by men. “Queen Mary is often remembered for her varied life,” Évelyne Esquiros, a feminist author in the 1950s, wrote. “But it must be remembered that when she reigned, women were little better than chattel—and often without a voice. In England, she shattered that domain, and though she adhered to the gender ideals of her time and era, in others, she was a trendsetter—a woman who refused to be cowed and fought to be recognized for what she was: England’s first queen regnant. She is a true chameleon—conservative historians have often used her position as a wife and mother to view her merely through that lens, preferring to focus on John II and his reign as king. Historians of a liberal bent are beginning to discover just how often she could cloak herself in stereotypical positions as a wife and mother to advance her own power…”

    John returned to England towards the end of 1544, following the end of the Italian War of 1544. After a brief visitation of the Pale of Calais, he landed in Dover, where he was greeted by his household suite—including his secretary Johan von Weze, who in 1540 had been named Bishop of Hereford. John wasted little time traveling from Dover to meet Mary at Richmond Palace, where the court was wintering. Mary’s favored residence, Greenwich, was by the 1540s undergoing significant renovations—and construction had also begun in London north of Westminster, where plans had been laid for a new royal palace alongside the Thames, known as St. Sylvester’s Palace, dedicated to Saint Sylvester, whose saint day fell upon Mary’s birthday—December 31. “The queen was most pleased to see the king’s return,” Catherine Devereaux, née Blount, wrote in a letter to her brother, Christopher Blount. “Relief and love mingled upon her façade… perhaps also with envy.” Once again, John could aid his wife in the heavy task of governance—which meant the diminishment of Mary’s position, even if only slightly. In John’s absence, there were changes to the Privy Council: Mary had replaced the Bishop of Ely as Lord Chancellor in favor of a secular lord, Ralph Neville, the Earl of Westmorland. The Bishop of London, Edmund Bonner, was named Lord Privy Seal. Elevations had been made for William Paget and Stephen Gardinier, who, alongside their positions as clerks, were given the title of Secretaries of State, with other duties.

    Among new laws passed upon John’s return was the Statute of Calais, which in 1545 made provisions for the Pale of Calais to send representatives to parliament for the first time. The first representative would be nominated by the royal deputy in Calais, while the second would be chosen by the Mayor of Calais and his council. Given the nebulous situation regarding the towns of Gravelines, Dunkirk, and Boulogne, they were not included in the statute. Still, John’s interests remained primarily in military (and naval) matters. By 1545, the navy consisted of some 40 ships—and John eagerly responded to the program suggested by the Marquess of Exeter. He ordered some 30 new ships to augment England’s naval defenses, a mix of smaller vessels, with 10 new ships to be galleons—purpose-built warships. In military matters, John campaigned for the Militia Act of 1545, which would be passed by parliament. This ended England’s quasi-feudal system that had hereto been used for national defense. The Militia Act codified the position of Lord Lieutenant in England’s counties, which would take over the sheriff’s former military functions.

    600px-The_Field_of_the_Cloth_of_Gold.jpg

    King John's entrance into Calais, c. 1545.

    The act covered musters and the maintenance of horses and armor. No longer would soldiers or noblemen be granted indentures to raise soldiers, and the commissions of array were also rendered obsolete. The Militia Act empowered those in parishes who owned property valued at £1 per annum to be liable for militia service: they were required to own arms for training purposes. They were required to report to sporadic militia training. During the war, random drawings were to be utilized to decide who would be drawn up for militia service, with militia regiments known as Bands placed together in tercio formations. Uniforms and weaponry would be provided by the state. John’s Militia Act created a regulated force of the country’s prosperous freeholders that could serve as reservist forces quickly armed and put into the field—useful for domestic and foreign issues. The Militia Act also included a religious focus—rolls were only drawn from the official and recognized Catholic parishes and rendering the holding of arms by Protestants illegal—an underground faith that was nevertheless gaining steady popularity in urban areas. “Military matters have always reigned supreme in the king’s mind,” Baron Paget wrote in a letter to his counterpart, the Bishop of Winchester. “To him, they are of paramount concern—for the true vitality of the kingdom. It goes hand in hand with the queen’s designs—they must work in common, not in opposition.”

    It was also no surprise that the king’s return meant expanding the royal family. In August 1545, Mary gave birth to her second son, Charles. Named in honor of Charles V, the young prince was christened and soon named Duke of York—though his official recognition would come when he was older. After Charles, another son quickly followed in November 1546—named Edward in honor of Edward IV, who was named Duke of Somerset. “From a sprig, a whole flower has flourished,” one English poet wrote in the 1540s in honor of the birth of the Duke of Somerset. “Leaves of white and red, melded into one—mixed with Danish blue.” For the first time since 1509, the English royal line stood secure—not only had the queen done her duty in replenishing her fragile line, but she had provided England with three sons—three young boys who would become young men in due course. Mary arranged for the royal nursery to be placed principally at Woodstock, with a secondary residence to be established at Eltham. Significant improvements were carried out at Woodstock, and both the queens paid keen attention to their children and how they were educated. Mary, the eldest royal princess, was given her household when she was six in 1541. Mary initially wished to provide the governess position to the Countess of Salisbury. Still, she declined on the grounds of ill health—suggesting that the position should be given to her daughter, Ursula Stafford. When Catherine (b. 1538) turned six, she was appointed her governess: Elizabeth Courtenay, the Marchioness of Exeter. Still, the education of Mary and John’s eldest son, Henry, was paramount. Henry formally passed out of the care of women shortly after his sixth birthday when the Count of Surrey was appointed governor of his household. Henry’s first tutors were Owen Oglethorpe, President of Magdalene College, along with an Italian tutor, Jacopo Bonfadio.

    Though the Prince of Wales was growing older, a more paramount concern once more drew John out of the kingdom. “I am preparing to undertake a campaign that has been in my designs since that vile monk first opposed me,” Charles V wrote in a letter to John in 1545. “I am asking for your aid and assistance—and hoping that you, as the Most Pious King of England, will aid me in excising this disease that has too long rotted my dominions.” Compared to distaste for an imperial alliance against the French, this idea appealed to John—to prove his worth as a Catholic monarch against the Protestant heresies that still festered in Europe. “The queen has lately been greatly agitated,” Frances Howard, the Countess of Surrey, wrote to the Countess of Arundel—Anne Fitzalan. “None can truly provide a balm in these situations except for you. She does not say it but longs for your return to court.” While Mary did not disagree with the emperor’s request or John’s desire to aid him, she sought that England have some material gain—even for a religious undertaking. “I know of your wishes best, as you know mine best,” a letter from Mary to John began—one of the few letters between the two preserved. “There is no doubt that I fear for your person… but we both know that we cannot solely render our aid on the cause of our faith or familial connections. Too often, my beloved mother sought to do the same, and you know where it has gotten us… as my lord husband and sovereign of this kingdom, you are fit to do as you please; I merely ask that you consider the funding of this undertaking—ask that in return, the emperor make good on some of his promises.” While John’s reply was not preserved, reports of the Exchequer from the period note a payment of £50,000 into the treasury from the emperor—the first installment of his £300,000 debt which he owed.

    renaissance-watercolor-of-the-palace-of-saint-sylv.jpg

    Palace of Saint Sylvester, 19th c. Watercolor; AI Generated.

    Though John received assurances from the emperor that he would be more than willing to ensure that the English troops would have their needed supplies, John would still need the necessary funding to pay his men throughout the campaign. “In his plans for the campaign, there is no doubt that the king perhaps contributed in some form to the financial issues that England would endure in the 1550s,” one economic historian would write. “Others were structural problems that other European monarchies dealt with during this period: obsolete financial systems that could not bring in or generate the income needed to maintain an early modern state.” In this, John was pretty limited in what he could do to raise funds: taxation would require parliamentary support, while the selling of crown lands would require the support of the queen—an idea that she might not endorse. John decided that he would need to raise the funds on his own, turning to members of his household for assistance. They proposed that the king go around the queen and seek help directly from the royal mint. The so-called Mühlhausen Debasement, named for the League of Mühlhausen, showed the issues of two co-sovereigns with equal power. In 1545, John issued a secret decree to the Royal Mint, calling for a temporary debasement of coinage in both weight and fineness—with the saved bullion for John’s eventual campaign in Germany. “The debasement showed what could happen when the two co-monarchs with equal authority had conflicting views,” one historian wrote of the co-monarchy of Mary and John. “They governed well, but their views were not always in alignment. Indeed, they often conflicted. Just as Mary aligned England with the emperor in 1543 over her husband’s objections, John sought to raise funding for his eventual campaign in Germany—and perhaps future campaigns, right under the queen’s nose.” For now, John ordered that the debased coinage be stored at the Jewel Tower in Westminster Palace and not put into active circulation. The crafty trick earned John a profit of £50,000—which he ordered his household treasurer to put towards his future military expenses.

    John’s campaign in Germany would last a little over a year—from 1546 to June 1547. By autumn, John and his troops returned to England relatively unscathed—of the 10,000 men that had accompanied him, some 8500 returned to England—more lost to disease and sickness than in battle. “The campaigning in Germany had only invigorated His Majesty to seek further changes to England’s military system,” Baron Paget wrote in a letter to the Bishop of Hereford. “He desires to go beyond the militia act and formally institute a true royal army—not an ad-hoc force raised for campaigns, but a standing army available for any cause, domestic or foreign. A great expense, no doubt—but he hopes that might bring the idea up to the queen first… he is aware of her fondness for you and hopes it may soften her heart towards the idea…”

    John had seen the worth in a well-organized force in his time abroad—and desired that England should have it too. Though the Bishop of Hereford approached the topic delicately with Queen Mary, it could not be said that she was won over to the idea. “War! Is that all that this man thinks of?” Mary reportedly uttered before a group of her maids exasperated. “Does he not realize the cost of such ventures? For each farthing I attempt to save, he spends five—all in his folly of playing the hero king in Denmark and now in Germany!” Indeed, the royal reunion towards the end of 1547 was somewhat tepid. “King John landed at Dover, as he oft did when he campaigned,” a page of his household wrote in his diaries. “His household was present—the queen herself rarely attended these homecomings, though she occasionally attended his farewells—when the king finally came ashore, he asked plainly: ‘What news of the queen?’ This was always his first question. There was discomfit among his household… none of us dared speak until he finally commanded us to do so… only one man was brave enough to speak: ‘Sire, we have waited all this time at Westminster… the queen dismissed us when you left and bade that we assemble at Westminster until your return. This last year, we have not been at court—we know not how the queen fares.’ His Majesty soon inquired, the man’s cheeks red as he dared speak again: ‘Her Majesty scolded us all very severely when we were ordered to depart. Clearly and plainly, she told us: I shall suffer no servants of a whoremonger under my roof.’ Her Majesty was greatly piqued… because she had been informed of the king’s secret.”

    The king’s so-called secret referred to his dalliance in Denmark with a Danish noblewoman, Clara Andersdatter, known amongst the king’s English advisors as Mistress Bille or even Mistress Billy. The king had taken her as a lover during his last visit to Denmark—and though he refused to consider the idea of bringing her to England, he arranged with her father to provide her with a generous pension and home if she would deign to attach herself to his fortunes—and that she did. John lavished some £3000 upon Clara and settled her in Antwerp, where she was given a fine townhouse with an array of servants. With her noble blood and a royal benefactor, Clara had little issue finding an entrée into the Habsburg imperial court, where she was named a lady-in-waiting to Princess Anne upon her fourteenth birthday. Despite the king’s relationship with Mary, some found little surprise in the fact that he had taken up with another. “I love the queen—but it is love mixed with duty—a heavy cross to bear.” John reportedly uttered. “But that which I share with Mistress Bille is love with passion and adoration. With her, I am truly king and sovereign.”

    600px-Resurrection.JPG

    Resurrection of St. Lazarus, c. 1465.

    It was a part of the numerous power struggles surrounding Mary and John’s complicated relationship. “Historical fiction has always found numerous ways to paint Mary and John’s relationship,” one modern historian wrote. “Bagshot’s Princess, Empress, for instance, attempted to paint the match between John and Mary as Empress Mary’s attempt to create a loving marriage of state—one she had been denied in her own life. With her trying to ensure John would spend his formative years in England and her deathbed wish regarding the match, John and Mary were meant to mirror the tortured emperor and empress. The epilogue shows John and Mary in a loving, tender marriage—something which Charles V and Empress Mary had never achieved in the fictional book. In truth, their relationship was more complicated. Were they in love? Yes, I believe so. But it was a love tinged with difficulty, much like any relationship—with the pressures of statehood and monarchy lopped on top of it. Much like any of us today, their relationship bore hardships and crises that they had to get through. There can be no doubt that the pair misunderstood each other on a fundamental level; just as Mary resented her subordinate position to her husband and sought to establish herself as his equal, John may have felt in their relationship as a dwarf-king… a king in name only, who sought to assert himself as England’s king and leading sovereign. They both desired the top job—and wished for the other to take the second seat. It can be of little surprise to us modern researchers that the king took a mistress—it established him as a virile and masculine figure, capable of leading a kingdom—a direct attack against his wife’s feeble femineity, who, as the mother of the nation was meant to sire the king’s legitimate heirs, and to endure his bad behaviors with grace and humility.”

    This crisis in the royal marriage endured for some time after John’s return. While Mary stayed with the children at the newly refurbished Woodstock, John had situated himself at Westminster. The pair only finally reunited during the Christmastide season, when both courts finally reunited at Richmond. “Christmas was a terrible affair,” Christopher Blount told a friend. “The succulent roasts and other food that accompanied our Christmas feasts seemed bland compared to years past. The king and queen sat beside one another—the queen’s face grimaced as she pushed her pottage around her plate; the king, in turn, looked downcast and did not touch his venison. It is said that after they retired, the pair rowed terribly late into the night before retiring to their separate bedchambers.” It was only the morning after that things seemed more settled. While John left no writings regarding that night, Mary provided more information in her diary: “Even now, I can still remember how piqued I was at the king and the white-hot fury that burned in my veins. It was my pride and vanity both—how could he prefer a mere woman for a queen, especially one who had brought him his crown? His taking of a mistress was utter humiliation… I was forced to admit that I did truly love him. As Queen of England, I felt that I alone was privy to his affection… a brutal betrayal which I learned was false. This was not a lesson that my mother had not taught me. Regardless, he offered up his honied apologies, and all was well. Of the woman? Well, I cannot say. It was something that forced me to close my eyes. It was simply another humiliation that I and the feminine race had to endure.” The court soon returned to peace, and harmony seemed restored between the royal couple.

    With the King of England at home again, plans were finally set towards a meeting between the English and Scottish sovereigns. While plans had initially been set for 1547, John’s plans in Germany meant that the proposed meeting was shelved, and the Scottish truce extended for another year. Now, plans were pushed forward for a formal conference to be held between King and Queen of England and King of Scots, the first meeting between English and Scottish sovereigns since the time of Henry V, when James I was held hostage in England. With the meeting of the sovereigns set for York in the summer of 1548, Mary and John used the opportunity to plan for royal progress of the north—planning for stays at noble estates and at Pontefract Castle—with the progress to terminate at York. “The conference at York was paramount to Queen Mary—but King John as well,” one historian would write. “The queen paid apt attention to the refurbishment of York Castle and ordered numerous tapestries and silks to be transported from other palaces—while some £5000 was expended on purchasing new items from Antwerp.” Mary and John both sought to dazzle—accounts for their wardrobes reached nearly £10,000 altogether—while the Scottish monarchs spent lavishly, with Alexander asking that Charlotte use her French pension to outfit a new trousseau for their expedition south.

    The English and Scottish sovereigns formally met at York in June 1548. Their discussions were vastly productive, resulting in the Treaty of York officially bringing peace between the two kingdoms following the Italian War of 1542-44. Other talks included a formal delineation of the current border, with Scotland, for the first time, recognizing English control over Berwick. “Days were spent in leisure just as they were spent upon duties,” one member of the king’s household wrote. “King John and Alexander excelled in the hunt and the chase—while Mary and Charlotte preferred more sedate activities.” Charlotte wrote to her brother, “The English queen stands tall—even of her short stature. Unlike her Spanish mother, she is a joyous figure—an Englishwoman.” Indeed, Charlotte and Mary developed a close relationship during the Conference of York, with the pair promising to exchange letters. Though there was no renewal of the Perpetual Peace of 1503, Mary decided there was a better way to ensure peace—a royal marriage. The Conference of York dissolved towards the end of July, with Prince Henry of Wales being formally betrothed to Princess Anne of Scotland—who in 1548 was heiress to Scotland. “We pray daily for a son,” Alexander IV stated at the betrothal ceremony. “We cannot help but mourn for those we have lost: Alexander, who perished shortly before his second birthday from a fever; Margaret, who died shortly before her first birthday from an ague. We pray daily to God and his Saints to give us a son—but if he should not, we should be pleased for our daughter to be Princess of Wales—and someday queen of a united isle.” Though the Conference did not represent a break of Scotland’s foreign policy, it did at least arrange for Scotland and England to embrace their equal interests over their differences.

    Mary and John’s planned return to the south of England in August was interrupted by news from Christian II—who once more beseeched that his son turn to Denmark. This time, Christian was locked in conflict with his Norwegian subjects. The current Archbishop of Nidaros, Jens Bratt, served as Regent of Norway and demanded that Christian II abide by the terms of the Håndfæstning of Oslo, which had granted Norway significant autonomy. Kristoffer Throndson, Admiral of Norway, had landed in Hull requesting John’s assistance to deal with the growing unrest amongst the Norwegians and ensure that Christian II abided by the decrees he had previously signed. “I must go again, I am afraid,” John reportedly uttered to the queen in Hull. “As you must,” the queen responded. “But you must only promise to come back in one piece.”

    Then, John took leave of England—with Mary only awaiting the news of his victory—unaware that she was pregnant and would quickly grow more prominent. Rather than take land in Denmark, John chose to land directly in Oslo—protected only by the troops that could be provided by Admiral Throndson—and a small contingent of English soldiers. He immediately sought accommodation with Archbishop Bratt, who demanded that the king accept the previous charter and adhere to the laws set down before it. When John railed against the archbishop’s demands, a conflict broke out, forcing John to seek refuge in the Fortress of Akershaus. It did not take long for the archbishop’s troops to assault the fortress, seeking to overtake the royal force. John, having taken a position upon the edges of the fortress to attack the upcoming rebels, was wounded deeply in his stomach with a terrible shot of a gunslinger. The troops did not take time to rush the young king into the recovery wing. “There was no doubt,” one poet in Akerhaus wrote with a fragile hand. “Ghosts at Thérouanne had come to reclaim another soul.”

    johndeathbed.jpg
    johndying.jpg

    King John's Forgiveness VS. King John Fades, 19th Century Paintings that deal with John II's death; AI Generated.
    Your Majesty,

    I write to you with the most incredible sadness regarding these terrible events at Akerhaus… though your husband has held valiantly against the forces that sought to depose me, it has come at a most terrible cost. I have no doubts that this letter will reach you in the strangest of energies, but I beg that you look upon each word given to you carefully. I must admit to you and realize fully that your husband, our prince, is no longer there. He has perished in this great assault, seeking victory and absolution amongst the enemies of Christ. This news will reach deep into your soul and shock you most heavily…. I can only hope that your servants and ladies will provide the aid your mother sought during her struggles. Remember, as your mother did, that your lord husband’s death was not in vain—he fought against the heretics until his final breath. He died as a man, warrior, and knight—as a man ought to. He shall be remembered for his pursuits, and as his father-in-law… his golden youth shall forever be preserved. Our Lord shall provide comfort—as always. Let the young king’s memory and true faith nourish you—as it nourished your mother.

    We pray most fervently for you and your child.


    I remain your devoted father and ally.

    CHRISTIAN II, REX DANIAE NORVEGIAE ET SUECIAE.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 40. Memoriae Sacrum
  • Chapter 40. Memoriae Sacrum
    1549-1553; England.

    “The king, my husband, is dead.
    This is the first time he has truly upset me.
    May God receive him in his glory.”
    — Queen Mary of England


    Musical Accompaniment: Reges Tharsis Et Insule

    marymourningblack.jpg
    marymourning.jpg

    Queen Mary in Mourning: Painted in 1551, these dual portraits portrayed the queen in both black (and white) mourning; AI Generated.

    The English court received the news of King John’s death with great shock. It was said that when Mary received the news from her father-in-law, she collapsed to the ground in a fit of emotion. “Her Majesty was not one for hysterics,” Anne Fitzalan wrote in her diaries. “I had not seen her weep since the death of the queen dowager nearly nine years before. But she truly gave herself to sorrow… she retired to her chambers at Greenwich and refused to see anyone—not even myself.” The queen’s chambers were draped in black crepe, and candles provided only some light, with the queen refusing to allow the sun in. Queen Mary, once known for her distinctive wardrobe of bright colors, fled into the comfort of black and white as her mourning colors. The business of state ground to a halt as she refused even to see members of her Privy Council—she had nothing to say to them until they had arranged for John’s body to be returned to England. This proved a tricky issue with the former king’s body in Norway: the Danish envoy intimated to the council that Christian II desired for his son to be buried in Denmark within the Chapel of the Magi in Roskilde Cathedral. When the news reached the queen, she was furious: “He was King of England first and foremost,” Mary argued. “He should be buried in England.”

    It was with great difficulty that John’s body was secreted from Akershus by members of his household, who also desired that he should return to England. Admiral Throndson was vital in providing a convoy for the English ships that would take John back to England, much to Christian’s consternation. “When the King of Denmark’s troops had finally dealt with the rebels and offered relief to Akershus, they discovered that the English had given them the slip.” Though Christian would protest furiously to his daughter-in-law for the undignified sight of his son’s former household, Mary said nothing. “He is where he belongs,” she reportedly told those closest to her. John had been King of England. His travails to Denmark had only caused further issues and had led to his demise; Mary saw no reason why he should come to rest there. He had been brought to England to be its king and had sired a new line of princes and princesses—he deserved to be buried where his accolades would be celebrated. The return of the king’s body to England in the winter of 1548 was not without issues: England’s great flagship, the Mary Rose, which served as part of the convoy accompanying John’s body, ran around near Dover—sinking and killing some 300 sailors. “The sinking of the Mary Rose presented a true end to an era—the most prominent ship built by Henry VIII sinking in the return of John II.” When John’s body finally arrived home, the queen was visibly pregnant in her fifth month. “Her Majesty discovered that she was pregnant some weeks before the letter from Denmark arrived,” one lady-in-waiting wrote to a friend. “She was in such a terrible state that we all feared for a time that she would not carry the child within her to term. But she has championed onward and holds a steady face of resolve.” Despite her grief, Mary was determined that her husband should have a proper send-off.

    John’s body had been taken care of in Norway. His surgeon had disemboweled the king and removed both his heart and lungs—with his heart being preserved in alcohol, along with parts of his entrails. Household officers stuffed his body with herbs and spices before the young king’s chandler, in charge of his candles and soaps, performed the embalming process. His body was then dressed in his favorite golden armor, which he had worn in so many victories and his last defeat. Finally, his household wrapped the body in cerecloth, a wax-coated cloth for burial shrouds. “Given the weeks that passed, the king’s body was in reasonable condition once it arrived in England,” one memorialist of the period wrote. “The queen ordered fresh scents to be plied over her husband’s body before ordering that his body be enclosed in sheets of lead that would be placed in his coffin. The king’s coffin was magnificent—a great dark oak, covered in purple velvet decorated with lace and gold gilt nails.” The king’s heart had accompanied him home, which would be placed in a silver casket before burial in the Chapel Royal of Greenwich. The king’s entrails did not accompany him to England—Mary agreed that they should be given to Christian II and buried in Roskilde.

    400px-Titian_-_The_Flaying_of_Marsyas.jpg

    The Flaying of the Marsyas, Titian; c. 1570.

    For twenty days, Mary arranged for John’s body to lie in state within Richmond Palace. The highest respects were paid to John, mimicking those given following Henry VIII’s funeral. Members of John’s household stood vigil around the clock, praying for their former patron’s soul—while masses were celebrated for John’s soul. The formal funeral occurred in December 1548, and one of John’s servants wrote: “It was a cold and snowy day. The king’s coffin was placed on a magnificent hearse of gold and gilt silver, drawn by four white horses that carried him to his final resting place: Westminster Abbey. A wooden effigy of the king was placed atop the coffin, dressed in the last outfit he had worn before he had left for Norway. The effigy held a scepter, and atop its head was the crown of Henry VII…” The abbey was bedecked in black cloth, the altar trimmed with purple velvet, with a purple canopy erected over the dean’s place. A great platform was built for the king’s coffin, decorated with purple velvet, gold cloth, and gilt figures of Christ and his disciples, while others depicted saints, such as St. George. All the court turned out for the funeral, and the Archbishop Tunstall of Canterbury gave the great oratory. Before the burial, the officers of John’s household (but not the great officers of state) broke their staves before throwing them into the grave. Mary intended to construct a tomb for both her and her husband—until then, John would be interned in a vault. The whole affair cost Mary nearly £12,000—but she insisted upon it. John had been King of England and deserved to be buried as one. With John’s burial, his household was formally dissolved. However, Mary would employ many: William Paget, for instance, remained close to the queen, and his wife Jane Seymour was even made a gentlewoman of the bedchamber. The Bishop of Hereford remained another close companion—until his death towards the end of 1548.

    In April 1549, Mary gave birth to her final child: a daughter whom she named Joan in honor of her father. “You are most precious to me,” Mary reportedly cooed to the newborn following her birth. “Because you are truly the last gift your father bestowed upon me.” Little Joan would become Mary’s favorite child and the most cossetted of her children. “Queen Mary was a hard taskmaster, especially with her children,” one historian would write. “She expected them to thrive and succeed, seeing them as extensions of her glory as England’s sovereign. Princess Joan, the youngest, was absolutely the apple of the queen’s eye… she could do no wrong, sometimes to the irritation of her older siblings.” John’s burial also meant the queen needed to return to governance—for a time, there were discussions amongst the council about what might happen next. Was the queen capable of governance in this time of sorrow? Might she seek to remarry at some point? Many questions remained unanswered until Mary addressed the council in the spring of 1549—shortly after the birth of Joan, in what would become known as her Dedication Speech.

    “As you know, these last months have heavily burdened me,” Mary announced before her assembled council. “Know that I value your knowledge, support, and the good you have handled for the realm in my absence. I remain sorrowful… but I know that my husband would wish that I press forward for England’s good. For you see, my dear lord husband, beloved in memory—he was first and foremost an English patriot. Tho’ he was not born of this land, he served it just as my beloved mother had. He would wish for me to continue doing all I possibly can for my people and subjects; after all, before my wedding oath, I took a coronation oath—to be your monarch and queen until my last dying breath. Though my husband is gone, I wish you to remember well that I am still bound to England—her mother and guardian. Those are my duties and my lifeblood, and I swear to you that all that remains of me shall be dedicated to this kingdom until I, too, take my last dying breath. I also know there has been grave confusion; what shall we do now that the king is gone?” At this, Mary wasted no time in producing the late king’s will—which addressed and bade those within the council to obey Mary as they had before her marriage—and as they had when he was frequently abroad, that the powers vested within him should by proper return to the queen. “I shall strive to be England’s monarch until my dying days… I make this oath to you, my dear councilors, and my beloved lord husband. In this, I must ask that you hear me plainly: understand that I shall never again marry—England may lack a king, but they shall have always had a queen, more dedicated and more ardent than any king before her. To be dedicated to England, I must remain in my widowed estate, which suits me more than any other now that my lord husband is gone.”

    In a master show, Mary played upon her feminine frailties to appease the council while holding onto sole authority. All was within her hands now, given to her by John within his will. Never again would Mary allow another man to dominate her or undermine her authority. “On that day,” Mary recorded in her diary. “I felt free, as I perhaps never had before. I mourned John—but in his death, he freed me from my gilded cage. He might have easily beseeched that I remarry, but he did not. He knew I was capable when perhaps I did not yet know myself if I was. I loved him even more for that.” John’s will included bequests for servants and asked that the queen attend to his debts—which stood at some £33,000—with the last payments due to his English troops in arrears. Several servants were nominated for pensions and honors—Paget was nominated to receive a pension of £500. Others, such as Antoine de Perrenot de Granvelle and Ascanio Arianiti, John asked that the queen continue to employ them—requesting that Perrenot receive a clerical benefice. At the same time, Ascanio was nominated for a knighthood. John’s bequests alone totaled some £10,000. England’s financial situation, once bright at the onset of Mary’s reign, now looked much gloomier: the crown’s debt toppled nearly £300,000 in 1549. Costs of the royal household also continued to increase, and in 1549, topped almost £65,000 annually. £5,000 alone was dedicated to Prince Henry’s household, while the costs of Queen Mary’s household numbered around £45,000—leaving £15,000 to care for the other royal princes and princesses. Though Parliament provided a subsidy of £29,000 to the Board of the Green Cloth to help cover the increasing costs of the royal household—it was not enough—and Mary was forced to cover the remainder from her own income: around £120,000 per annum.

    Queen_Elizabeth_in_Parliament_Met_DP890178.jpg

    Queen Mary & Parliament; c. 1550s.

    Despite this, Mary intended to show her position as England’s sovereign and continued to host a sumptuous, if subdued, court. By the fall of 1549, Mary received the credentials of Spain’s new ambassador, Beltrán de la Cueva, the Duke of Albuquerque. “Her Majesty was overjoyed to receive an ambassador from her mother’s homeland…” one lady wrote in a letter home. “She thought the Duke of Albuquerque was debonaire, and they often spent time speaking in Spanish and of Spain.” Rumors swirled about the court—some even believed that the ambassador had arrived to bring the queen an offer of marriage from her nephew, the Prince of Asturias. While the duke did come seeking marriage, it was not for the queen—but rather for her eldest daughter. “The Prince of Asturias’s eldest son has lost both his wife and child,” one court gossip wrote. “The Duke of Alburquerque has come to ask for the hand of Princess Mary.” At fourteen, the queen’s namesake was still a young girl. Quiet and sedate, she took after her father—with brown hair and bright green eyes. “Princess Mary was the queen’s treasure—she was like a little mouse, always willing to do whatever the queen asked and striving to please her.” The princess sought to excel in her studies and was quite devout. “Did I have reservations about sending her away?” Mary would write later in her diary. “Of course! I could not imagine being parted from her. But even then, I ached for my mother and her stories of Spain. She often told me that had I not been born Queen of England… she would have been pleased to have made me Queen of Spain. I saw this as my daughter’s destiny—her role was to be Queen of Spain and sire Spain’s next kings and to make my mother’s wish come true.” Princess Mary and Prince Fernando were betrothed through the Treaty of Windsor signed in October 1549—it was agreed that the pair should be married in the next year.

    Of the queen’s eldest children, there remained Princess Catherine. While Louis IV of Naples showed interest in the princess for his eldest son Renato, discussions broke down regarding her dowry. France proved equally recalcitrant in discussing any possible marriage treaty, desiring Catherine to bring Boulogne back to France as part of her dowry. Mary refused to release Boulogne back into France merely as her daughter’s dowry. Negotiations with the court of Savoy debated a match between Catherine and Filippo Giano Amedeo (b. 1533), heir to the Duke of Savoy. This culminated in the Treaty of Asti, which betrothed the pair—with the official marriage to occur in 1553, Catherine came of age. “If only I were concerned with the futures of my daughters,” Mary lamented with Jane Paget—wife of William Paget. “But I am not, and I cannot be. There are graver concerns that look upon my sons for succor.” Aside from her young daughters, Mary soon became gripped into a conflict with Christian II and Denmark through Denmark’s envoy. To the surprise of none, Christian II sought to press Mary into sending one of her younger sons—preferably Charles, the Duke of York—to Denmark to be educated and to serve as his grandfather’s future heir. Mary demurred and deferred as much as she could. In early 1550, Christian II sent a new ambassador to represent him in London, Otte Vinstarr, who had recently been named Bishop of Børglum. Mary received Bishop Vinstarr lavishly at Eltham and even allowed her to accompany her on a small progress to Woodstock. “Henry, the Prince of Wales, is hale and most resembles his late father,” Vinstarr wrote in a memorandum to Christian II. “The Duke of York and Somerset are young and handsome boys… one cannot be found without the other. The princesses are equally enchanting; the eldest, Mary, is nearly fifteen and will wed the Prince of Spain soon. Catherine is a year older than the Prince of Wales, betrothed to the son of the Duke of Savoy… she is a pretty little thing who entertained us by playing the virginals. Isabella, named in honor of the great Isabella of Castile and your late wife, is a crafty little girl… I have no doubt that she will grow up into a beautiful creature. Little Joan, a little over a year old, is growing steadily… a pretty babe.”

    600px-Lucas_Cranach_-_Der_Jungbrunnen_%28Gem%C3%A4ldegalerie_Berlin%29.jpg

    Fountain of Youth, Lucas Cranach; c. 1546

    At Woodstock, Mary had a formal interview with Bishop Vinstarr—with some members of the council present. “I am sure that you know why I have been sent here, madam,” Vinstarr allegedly told the queen. “Indeed, I do—but I ask that you speak it plainly before me and my ladies. You are in a trusted space.” At this, Vinstarr was finally forced to admit his genuine reasons for coming. “His Majesty understands the delicate situation regarding the late king’s demise; he believes it truly the one thing that only you and he shall understand. You have lost a husband—and he, his only son and heir. He looks to you at this time of need and hopes that Denmark and England shall continue to enjoy a cordial relationship. In this, he asks only one thing of you: he desires that when his time comes, he should be succeeded as king by one of his grandsons—one of your sons. He wishes to name the Duke of York as Prince of Norway and formally acknowledge him as his successor. He asks that you accede to his wishes and allow me to take the Duke of York to Denmark—so that he should be educated as befits a future King of Denmark.” It proved a logical request—but the bishop was speaking with the queen, who just lost her husband two years previously. Queen Mary could not keep her calm—and exploded upon the ambassador in a show of Tudor rage. “You dare to come into my presence and ask for my son?!” Mary thundered angrily as she dressed down the Danish ambassador as her councilors looked askew—they had dealt with such rage but had never seen the queen attack an ambassador in such a way. Remember who your master is and what he has done. It is his follies that have resulted in the death of my beloved husband and his heir. So long as I breathe, I shall surrender no child into his care, for he is no better than a murderer. He led my husband willingly to his death, and I shall never allow him to lead any son of mine—or any daughter—into the same fate! I know not how Denmark is governed, but the feet do not seek to direct the head in England. Silly little sir—a sniveling, mealy-mouthed rat who cowers in your bishop’s robes that you are not fit to wear. I say this plainly—neither the Duke of York nor any of my sons shall be the king’s heir. I renounce and reject your offer, sir. If the king needs a prince, then maybe he should remarry. Leave now, and never show yourself in my presence again!”

    Mary refused to see the bishop again. Before taking his leave, he was invited to meet with the council—who provided him with a document that would become known as the Renunciation of Woodstock, where Mary renounced for her children all rights and claims that they inherited from their father, covering the Kingdoms of Denmark, Norway, Sweden—along with the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein and any other associated territories. The renunciation was signed by the queen and stamped with the privy seal—and included the signatures of the witnesses—including the Privy Council members. The legality of the renunciation had long been debated among royal genealogists and historians—did the queen truly have any right or authority to renounce claims for her underage children? Some argued that she could not, while others argued based on their blood: as children of John II, they were members of the House of Oldenburg, and in them ran the heritage of Denmark and her associated dominions. No paper could rid them of that which they had possessed since their first breath. Some others believed the queen, as guardian of her children, had the right to renounce any claims to their paternal inheritance. Another argument centered around Mary’s sovereignty—and that as Queen of England, she had a right to determine for her children to avoid dragging England into further conflicts. “England was weary following the king’s death—his governance had entangled England into commitments in Scandinavia, which had burdened and indebted the kingdom,” one historian wrote. “None looked upon the idea of the Prince of Wales, or even the Duke of York becoming King of Denmark with fondness. Signing the queen’s renunciation was the less odious option.”

    Even among the council, there were different arguments surrounding the renunciation: “The queen intends to sign the final draft tomorrow,” Baron Paget wrote to Bishop Gardinier. “I know, as you know, that the queen is emotional over this matter—it is not a political tactic. We agree it is a mistake, but she is adamant that it must be done…” Regardless of the decision’s legality, Bishop Vinstarr was forced to return to Denmark empty-handed—a scrap of paper instead of the Duke of York. Without Queen Mary’s cooperation, the idea of proclaiming one of her sons as Denmark’s heir was floundered. Now nearly seventy, Christian II debated marrying again to secure the succession. “They say that King Christian has made an offer to the King of Poland regarding his two youngest sisters,” one courtier wrote. “Two are still unwed—Sophia and Catherine, who are twenty-five and twenty-six.” Discussions over either princess’s possible dower rights ultimately floundered the negotiations. Other discussions centered on Christian’s mistress, Ingeborg Jendatter, the daughter of a wealthy burgher—with some suggesting that the king should wed her if she fell pregnant—which she did not. “I am an old man weary of this world,” Christian II reportedly told his chancellor. “I do not wish to walk down the aisle again.” This left the matter of the Danish succession unsolved… a wound that would fester onward.

    Despite these troubles, 1550 was not without its glories. In May 1550, Princess Mary was wed by proxy to Prince Fernando Alonso, with the Duke of Albuquerque serving as her proxy. “Queen Mary watched in tears as her eldest daughter was wed in the chapel royal of the Palace of St. Sylvester—the first royal marriage to be celebrated there. Afterward, the queen hosted a feast and ball,” one courtier wrote in a letter home. “Where previously the queen had danced and ate with gusto, she merely sat upon the dais in her somber gown—allowing Princess Mary the honor of the first dance. After an hour, she withdrew from the festivities, which continued late into the night…” Mary accompanied her daughter to Portsmouth, where a Spanish squadron awaited. The handing-over ceremony saw Princess Mary leave behind her English household before passing from the care of her mother into the care of the Bishop of Plasencia, Francisco de Trujillo. Princess Mary was only allowed to take a few of her English servants with her—this included her old nursemaid, Jane, Lady Browne[1], who had lost her husband Anthony Browne at Akershus, and a few younger maids of honor. “Her Majesty wept piteously as Princess Mary boarded the Spanish Galleon, the San Fernando sent to retrieve her,” the Dowager Countess of Essex wrote in a letter. “They had embraced until they could no longer… her majesty bade her retinue stay, and they watched until the Spanish ship faded into the horizon… several English ships, the Henry Grâce à Dieu, John and Mary, and Golden Lion, provided salutes as the San Fernando passed away… the fortress of Portsmouth thundering in applause as well.” The queen realized then how quickly her children were growing up—and how difficult parting with them could be.

    400px-El_cardenal_Reginald_Pole%2C_por_Sebastiano_del_Piombo.jpg

    Cardinal Reginald Pole, c. 1549.

    News from Rome also proved prudent—in 1549, Pope Gelasius III died after a long illness shortly after formally opening the Council of Bologna. The papal conclave opened in December of 1549 but was dragged into the spring of 1550, marred because of conflicts between the French and Imperial parties over differing candidates. Among those considered papabile was Cardinal Reginald Pole—once Bishop of Salisbury, he had been named Bishop of Palestrina by Gelasius III in 1545. Aside from serving as Queen Mary’s informal ambassador, Cardinal Pole played a vital role within the Roman Curia. “The bounties of Rome that it deigned to bless England with were because of Cardinal Pole’s intercession,” one historian wrote. “His close connection with the queen gave him a vital avenue, and some envied him.” François II of France had several favorites—Louis of Vendôme, a prince du sang and Bishop of Laon; and George of Amboise. He knew both were likely unelectable and chose to support Ippolito d’Este—presently the Archbishop of Milan. On the other hand, Charles V saw Niccolò Ridolfi as a potential candidate alongside Georg of Austria, the Prince-Bishop of Liège, and an illegitimate son of Emperor Maximilian. Disputes between the squabbling factions saw some look upon Cardinal Pole as a possible compromise candidate, and by May 1550, he had attained all the votes he needed to become pope except for two. Though Gian Pietro Carafa attempted to attack Pole’s credentials to paint him as a heretic, Pole ultimately succeeded, with the support of the imperial faction. On May 27, 1550, Pole was elected. He took the name Adrian VI in honor of the last English Pope.

    In Ireland, Mary continued to push for further crown control over an isle and a clampdown against the clans flouting her authority. William Brabazon served as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland until he died in 1551 while dealing with the so-called King of Leicester, Cahir Mac Art Kavanagh. Though Brabazon was killed, his troops succeeded in winning against Kavanagh’s forces—forcing him into submission. He was forced to renounce his title, The MacMurrough, but in exchange, he was granted a royal pardon, and the queen named him Baron of St. Molyns. In 1551, Mary ordered that Thomas Butler, son of the last Earl of Ormond, be restored to his title and a portion of his lands. Though the new Earl of Ormond, who was twenty, begged the queen for a permit to return to Ireland, she refused. “He is better under our nose,” Mary reportedly uttered. “I do not wish him to trouble us as his father did.” Though some within the council suggested the Earl of Surrey go to Ireland, Mary refused. “He is foolish and will cause too much mischief amongst the Irish—we must have a more moderate disposition.” She chose to nominate the Earl of Arundel for the position. Arundel accepted the position with hesitation—and though Mary loathed to be parted from her dearest friend, gave leave to the Countess of Arundel to accompany him. The Countess of Arundel would pass away in Ireland in 1552. Arundel would spend his tenure carrying out Mary’s orders as best he could—and frequently coming into conflict with Irish chieftains and Highland Scots from Kintyre who were invited to settle in Antrim by the O’Neills and caused further trouble. Mary’s prime policy in Ireland was the creation of plantations—where seized land was handed to those who might use it productively. Chief among the recipients were Catholic religious orders, such as the Jesuits, who received land in West Meath. This was the beginning of the Jesuit Plantations—missions in Ireland where the Jesuits would use the native Irish as forced labor while attempting to make them good Catholics. Other groups benefitted as well, with the Knights Hospitaller being granted lands near Granard to open a new priory.

    From this time, the English crown was also forced to deal with subversive religious influences that would have significant repercussions in Ireland. The first printing press arrived in Ireland in 1550, set up in Wexford, almost a year before the English set up a printing press in Dublin. Wexford became a center for Irish opposition to the English cause in Ireland, and numerous tracts against the English were published. This also included religious works: though the works of Luther and other reformers proved intriguing, works of more radical Protestant groups such as the Anabaptists were also published. The Catholic Church, now headed by an English Pope who supported the English cause in Ireland, helped turn the island into a fertile ground eager to embrace change. Chief among those was a man from Munster known as Hugh Ó Cuileanáin, who soon adopted the name Columbanus and would later become known as Prophet Ó Cuileanáin—and a headache among the English. “Ó Cuileanáin’s origins are murky—some said he was a rogue priest, some a charlatan, and others still that he was an Egyptian—a term used then as a catch-all for Romani and travelers,” one historian wrote. “In 1553 Ó Cuileanáin claimed to have been visited by angels who instructed him to that he was God’s new voice on earth—and that it was his mission to purify the Irish church.”

    Ó Cuileanáin, who often claimed to have dreams and visions, soon began to build up a group of followers in southern Ireland, who were itinerant and moved from area to area. Ó Cuileanáin’s group proved highly popular, as he claimed to be a cunning man skilled in folk magic: he mesmerized groups with his stories and, in one situation, allegedly stunned an Irish chieftain when he helped locate a criminal who absconded with the chief’s prized possessions. His group offered their services to those who needed them, offering to find lost items, selling folk medicines, and even supplying potions to women that could make a man love her—or dispose of a husband who had overstayed his welcome. Ó Cuileanáin’s early preaching primarily consisted of stories from the Old Testament spoken in the vernacular; he claimed that the New Testament was fraudulent and attacked the English as devils, while he castigated the Catholic Church as a din of vice and inequity—bent on allowing England to subjugate Ireland. He proclaimed that he had been sent to purify Ireland. His group adopted unique beliefs: they celebrated Easter on the same day that Jewish Passover was celebrated (a form of Quatrodecimanism), continually moved about in the form of peregrinatio, or exile, and celebrated Saturday as their day or worship and rest, rather than Sunday. “From the early followers, certain dietary restrictions were adopted as well,” one historian wrote of Ó Cuileanáin’s life and journey. “They adopted a form of Mosaic Law—they would only eat meat from animals with split hooves, which were herbivores; birds without crop and without webbed feet; of fish, they would not eat shellfish but consumed fish that possessed scales—and all fruit, nuts, and berries were allowed.” The English government in Dublin did not know it, but this group would eventually grow beyond what it now was.

    600px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_The_Tower_of_Babel_%28Vienna%29_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited.jpg

    The Tower of Babel by Pieter Bruegel the Elder; c. 1563.

    By 1553, Mary was consumed with marriage preparations for her second daughter, Catherine, who was betrothed to the heir of the Duke of Savoy. “I believe the prince is most impatient to receive his English bride,” Ramboldo Lascaris, the Savoyard ambassador, wrote to the Duke of Savoy. “I can say with relief that he shall be most pleased… she is both beautiful and, it seems, very accomplished as well.” Plans were set for the proxy wedding to be celebrated in June 1553. Plans also progressed for the Prince of Wales to wed Princess Anne of Scotland. “Queen Charlotte’s childbearing had necessarily improved in the years; in 1550, she gave birth to a prince named James, who lived for less than a day. In 1552, she gave birth to a daughter named Charlotte, who seemed to thrive… when the queen announced in the summer of 1553 that she was expecting again, all in Scotland hoped she would give birth to a boy…” With the court centered at the Palace of St. Sylvester, Mary arranged that Catherine should make a pilgrimage to Henry VII’s Chapel within Westminster Abbey to pray for blessings in her new marriage before where her father had been married.

    Princess Catherine was stricken with fear regarding the idea: “If I take one step into that chapel,” she uttered to one of her ladies. “I fear I shall not return.” While Princess Catherine completed her pilgrimage without issue, she breathed a sigh of relief—but her words proved prophetic when, the next day, she fell ill. Princess Catherine’s health quickly deteriorated, and she showed symptoms of sweating sickness. By the time the sun set, Princess Catherine was dead. “Her Majesty sat by her daughter for every moment, personally nursing her despite concerns from the physicians who worried that she too would fall ill,” one courtier wrote. “When the surgeons and physicians announced that the princess was gone, the queen lost herself in grief…” Mary’s travails were not over, for within hours of Catherine’s death, the Prince of Wales fell ill as well. Like with the princess, his symptoms grew worse with each minute, and he died in the early hours of the next morning. Within a day, Mary had lost not just one child but two. “She grieved, and grieved…the tears did not stop,” the Countess of Surrey wrote in a letter to her husband. “In a short time, she had lost two children—when the wound of losing her husband remains so raw. I cannot help ache for her… fearing for her heart as well as her mind.”

    [1]OTL Joan Champernowne, supposed sister of Kat Ashley
     
    Last edited:
    Addenum: Additional AI Portraits / Images
  • So: I often generate quite a bit of images when I am writing a chapter, or sometimes just because. I'll be honest: sometimes stuff gets stuffed into a folder for a variety of reasons: I end up getting a better or actual historical image, I'm not happy with the quality, or sometimes what I've generated just ends up not playing any role in the chapter and ends up getting ignored. Sometimes I generate stuff for down the road, only to generate new things later. I've built up a bit of a backlog of random AI images, from portraits to some architectural things... so I figured I'd release them here for you guys as an addendum! These images are all AI generated.

    Addendum — Additional AI Portraits & Images

    9sXSHdb.jpeg

    Catherine of Aragon, Queen Dowager of England —
    Circa 1539-40, this would've been after her retirement
    to Syon. I pictured her here in white mourning as she did
    sometimes wear for dramatic effect, and I could see her doing
    so for a portrait! I'm not sure if ever intended to use this or
    if it was just for fun, but at least you have an idea of Catherine
    post 1536, her OTL death date! She likely lived in great style at
    Syon and other portraiture of her was likely similar to this,
    with some perhaps even depicting her wearing a nun's habit.

    1cX2eV5.jpeg

    The Duchess de Plaisance's Châteaux de la Jatte
    Anne Boullan's Château de la Jatte, located in the Seine River on
    the Île de la Jatte, which can only be reached by boat. This ended
    up very pretty, but I couldn't get the AI to do what I wanted it to do!
    Even now the painting makes it look like an artificial island and not
    a natural one, like the Île de la Jatte truly is. The Château de la Jatte
    ended up being only a tiny part in the Catherine Howard chapter, so
    I shelved this. I like to think the Château will have a life beyond being
    owned by Anne—and perhaps her son Ottavio will sell it to his uncle or
    to the crown. I can only imagine the things that might happen here in the
    1600s, 1700s, 1800s... I can only imagine the scenes and scandals set here!


    o6ULF7l.jpeg

    Palazzo of the Grand Masters of the Knights Hospitaller
    Potential Image of the as-of-yet unnamed Palace of the Grand Masters
    of the Order of Corfu (Knights Hospitaller). The idea here was it gets built
    north of Corfu in the Palaiopolis of old Greek ruins, in what was Korkyra
    near OTL Mon Repos. The general idea is that it uses some old pieces from
    various temples in the region, such as Doric Columns and Pediments as part
    of a brand new construction that melds the Italian Renaissance and it's style
    with ancient Greek architecture. I'm posting this because I have no clue if it will
    ever get used, and I think it's too beautiful to just sit on my computer! I still have
    so many ideas for this place: Greek statues, and maybe decorative or real Aqueducts.
    I can only imagine if the Knights manage to raid into Morea or even Attica and get
    their hands on Marble statues or even marble slabs from the Acropolis or Partheon
    that might be used for this very palace as trophies of triumph over the Ottoman Turk.

    xrQZYR4.jpeg

    Palazzo in Hospitaller Corfu — Possibly an Auberge or Government Palazzo
    Second potential image of the Corfu Palace. I ended up liking the first image more,
    but this one was also stunning. I just felt like it didn't look "different" enough and
    I like how the first one had a much wider view, so this was scrapped. This one is
    definitely still good too, but I thought it might work more for a more minor palace
    in Hospitaller Corfu, such as an Auberge for one of the orders Langues, or some
    administrative building of sorts. Still undecided, but enjoy! It definitely is pretty!


    bWOlrHE.jpeg

    Portrait of Princess Mary, eldest daughter of John and Mary
    This was supposed to be circa 1549-1550, to be used in the
    previous chapter. I ended up scrapping this because I wasn't
    happy with the outlook... to me, she doesn't look fourteen. Her
    betrothal and marriage also ultimately played a tiny role in the
    chapter, and I didn't really want to have to generate portraits for
    Princess Catherine and Prince Henry both, who arguably had much
    bigger roles in the last chapter than their eldest sister. Still, we
    will probably get a better look at her when she's older and has
    settled a little in Spain—either as Princess of Asturias or Queen.
    pWlbGbY.jpeg

    Queen Mary & Princess Mary, Madonna & Child, 1535-36
    This would've been painted sometime in 1535-1536. I loved
    the idea of depicting Mary the Elder and Mary the Younger as
    Madonna and Child. And royalty did sometimes do portraits
    like these. I never had a good reason to utilize this picture, so
    it ended up in my little vault of creations. I kept it around mostly
    because it took ages and ages to try to get the AI to understand
    what I was trying to do. I had to be very direct and very simple in
    my image prompt. I had to be factual. It came out amazing but
    honestly, I was not very happy with how Mary the Elder's face
    turned out. This was made way before I generated any of the
    other portraits that did get published that gave her the "look"
    that you all know and love! It definitely ended up being a very
    unique portrait. and it should be seen because of that alone.

    trTlgdC.jpeg

    Pomegranate Portrait of Queen Mary of England —
    So, this is an older portrait of the queen and is meant
    to mimic Elizabethan portraits of Elizabeth of the same
    period IOTL. As you can see, she's dressed in staunch
    widow's black. I haven't totally decided if she ever wears
    color again, but I sort of do like the matron widow look
    for our girl when she gets older! Of course I don't have
    any need for this portrait yet, but I basically made it to
    experiment. I will keep refining my AI images for when
    we do get to the 1570s, which means this one won't
    end up getting used! I ended up calling this painting
    the Pomegranate Portrait because of one lovely detail
    that you can see beside the queen sitting on the table.
    The slices of pomegranate sitting on the table are meant
    to represent Catherine of Aragon, who used the fruit as
    her emblem. It's a homage to her mother; Pomegranates
    also represent fertility. In this painting the fruit honors
    Mary (an older woman past childbearing) as England's
    queen and mother, the nation's maternal protector.


    Portraiture in General
    Later paintings of Mary IATL will definitely be chock full of allegorical details and might include motifs dedicated to her father and her Tudor blood, or to John II as well, to represent the Oldenburg heritage that England's royal princes and princesses now carry. Things I might not be able to generate through AI. As seen above and unlike well-known Elizabethan portraiture in the 1570s & 1580s IOTL that sought to show Elizabeth / Gloriana as a Faerie Queen who did not age, Mary will instead claim her aging, as it plays into her role as a widowed queen who is England's Matron, the wise older woman who knows what is best for her kingdom. In effect, her wrinkles will become as effective as Gloriana's ageless façade in terms of English royal propaganda.

    The Marian Cult that likely springs up in the final years of Mary's reign likely creates majestic portraits that extol her virtues and greatness while portraying her as she truly is: a widow, a mother, and a queen.

    After her (eventual) death, in about ten or twenty years, painters will likely look back upon the Marian Age as England's golden era much as the Elizabethan Age. Much as we connect the Tudors with 16th Century England (primarily Henry VIII and Elizabeth I), Mary will be the one who be connected with 16th century England IATL. Portraits might be devised that show Mary as the Goddess Eos or Juno, or even a dual portraiture that shows the founders of England's new dynasty, John and Mary as Zeus and Hera, with some of their children depicted not as cherubs and angels, but the offspring of these Goddesses: Mary's son and eventual heir/successor is perhaps depicted as Ares, an omen / warning towards reckless warfare, while her eldest daughter, Mary, might be depicted as Illyria, the Goddess of Birth and her youngest daughter, Joan, might be shown as Hebe, the Goddess of Youth.

    Immediately after her death, however, there might perhaps be a sense of relief—depending on how long she reigns, and how her final years are, there will perhaps be those that will be happy to see the elder queen, great as she was finally pass away, so that her son can claim his birthright... this might be all the more tangible as his age will likely contrast greatly with his mother's, and his wife and young(ish) children might be much needed balm. I could absolutely see something painted such as this sometime after her death, or even something like this in later centuries!​
     
    Chapter 41. Rogues of Italy
  • Chapter 41. The Rogues of Italy
    1545-1553; Italy.

    “I found Rome a city of bricks and left it a city of marble.”
    — Augustus


    Musical Accompaniment: Toccata Cromatica XII

    3wdrWaE.jpeg
    t9MrIlH.jpeg

    Duke Filippo II Emanuele of Milan & Duke Ottavio of Parma, c. 1550s; AI Generated.

    The death of King François in 1547 had profound effects on the Italian peninsula, which allowed for the Treaty of Compiègne to come into effect. The king’s youngest living son—Philippe Emmanuel, the Duke of Orléans, who would become more commonly known as Filippo Emanuele, was finally enfeoffed with the Duchy of Milan and the Lordship of Genoa. As young Filippo was only twelve, it was decreed that his mother, Beatriz of Portugal, would serve as his regent until he came to age. Another concern was the erection of the Duchy of Parma in the territories surrounding Parma and Piacenza that Milan had once held. These were to be spun off into a second duchy, formed by the emperor, which was granted to the late French king’s eldest bastard son—Octave or Ottavio as he too would become known. He too was still in his youth, at fourteen—and it was agreed that he too should have a regent in the person of his mother, Anne Boullan—the Duchess of Plaisance and a long-standing rival to Beatriz of Portugal. These two women, who had long feuded in France, would soon export their problems into Italy.

    Anne and Ottavio arrived at their new possessions first—Beatriz was detained by the forty-day mourning period carried out by the Dowager Queens of France. This head start allowed Anne to take hold of her son’s possessions and legitimize his territories in Italy—preventing their capture by Beatriz. Anne quickly took to the business of government and established her son’s court at the Palazzo del Governatore. “It is a grim place,” Anne wrote in a letter to her brother back in France. “Medieval and Romish, it has a beautiful edifice… but it does not compare to the châteaux of France.” One of her first decisions was to expend some £30,000 from her personal revenues to acquire a group of homes within Parma’s central square. She ordered them razed and soon began construction on what would become known as the Palazzo di Santilario, which in time would become more commonly known as the Palazzo Ducale.

    Anne wanted to build a new palace for her son that would allow him to host a glorious court and enhance his power among the Italian princes. Anne worked chiefly with a small council—one of her primary advisors was Andrea Casali, a renowned humanist; another was the Bishop of Parma—Basilio Chiari. Anne did not dare rock the boat regarding Parma’s Catholic religious structures. While she continued to hear private Protestant sermons within her chapel, her son attended Catholic services hosted by Bishop Chiari. “Were he merely the Duke of Plaisance in France, he would have been free to choose the dictates of his own consciousness,” Anne wrote in another letter to her brother. “In Italy, the Catholic faith—and the Pope—reign supreme. If he is to reign here in this land, he must also be Catholic.” It wasn’t a thought that boded well for Anne, but she thought only of Ottavio. “When he is grown, I can return to France,” Anne wrote in her diary. “Only then will I be truly free to worship as I believe.” Anne still had many loyal servants—though some refused to continue in her service in Italy, she found new servants in Parma who became devoted to her. Anne also remained close to her siblings: Georges, the Duke of Valentinois, was not exactly welcomed at the more subdued court of François II and settled at Châlus with his wife Louise, where he dedicated himself to the management of his estates and the education of his two sons, Alain (b. 1538) and Jean (b. 1541) Marie, the Dame de La Bussière, and Anne’s elder sister agreed to accompany her to Parma—both as a companion and moral support. “My sister has been more than kind to us,” Marie wrote in a letter to her husband. “When her star was high in the sky, she did all she could for us. Now that her star has fallen, I feel compelled to offer her whatever support I can… I know that you shall be most busy with your archival work, and the children shall be in good hands… in hope to return in a year, perhaps two at the latest…”
    400px-Arms_of_Charles_dOrleans_%28Milan%29.svg.png

    The Coat of Arms of the Duke of Milan
    Orléans quartered with those of Milan, used by the Visconti.

    Beatriz and Filippo did not reach Milan until the fall of 1547, but compared with Anne’s trepidation, Beatriz was overjoyed. “Even the air here is fresher and lighter compared to that which I have breathed day in and day out,” Beatriz would write in a joyous letter to her brother in Portugal. “Twenty years of heartache and trouble faded when I crossed the frontier.” Beatriz and Filippo first took up residence in Pavia at Visconti Castle, with the queen dowager issuing strict instructions that both Palazzo Ducale in Milan should be prepared for her son’s inhabitance, alongside the Castello Sforzesca. It did not take long for Beatriz to earn a reputation as a taskmaster among the Milanese. Many of them fondly referred to the queen dowager as Madama Vedova—Madam Widow. “Queen Dowager Beatriz left France loaded down with whatever she could take with her,” one historian wrote. “Furniture, tapestries—even books, glassware, and candles—all were taken so that they could decorate the spartan Milanese palazzo and castles, some of which had not been inhabited in decades. In one instance, Beatriz even carted away her featherbed from Fontainebleau. When Queen Isabelle took possession of the queen dowager’s chambers, she could not help but remark: ‘Perhaps an inventory would be easier if we counted that which the queen dowager has not taken.’ While some items were in the queen’s right to take, others, perhaps, were not—from the royal library, she claimed tomes that had previously been a part of the Visconti library… half had been removed from Pavia to France in 1498; she succeeded in claiming about a third of the books to be returned.” Like Anne, Beatriz was desperate to make the Milanese residences comfortable for herself and her son. Unlike Anne, Beatriz intended to remain in Italy until she took her last dying breath. Beatriz used her jointure, valued at some £35,000 per annum, liberally—she used funds shortly after her arrival to purchase land near the ducal park in Milan to build her own private residence, the Padiglione del Porto.

    Beatriz had always been denied an official political position throughout her marriage to King François. Despite this, she proved to be a quick study. The first move was to weaken French influence within the Senate of Milan—she named Ippolito d’Este, the Archbishop of Milan, her primary minister. Even her household was purged of French influence, with Beatriz naming Ricciarda Malaspina, the Marquise of Massa, as her primary lady-in-waiting. Beatriz’s working relationship with the archbishop proved helpful. It allowed her to build relationships with Italy’s native princes—such as Ippolito’s brother, Ercole II—the Duke of Ferrara and Modena. Ercole II had been wed to the daughter of the late Claude of Lorraine, Maria of Lorraine, who had given him two sons, Alfonso (b. 1534) and Claudio (b. 1545), and a daughter Maria Antoinetta (b. 1543). It had not been a happy marriage, and Ercole shed no tears upon her death. Ercole was one of the first princes invited to Milan by Beatriz—with some whispering that perhaps she had an ulterior motive. “She has moved through the seasons—spring, summer, and fall, with tragedy at every turn,” one Italian poet allegedly wrote. “In the winter of life, a new love springs forth to revive.” For the first time in her life, Beatriz discovered that men were not all lecherous creatures. “I discovered that men, even handsome ones—could be kind… and dare I say, loving?” She wrote in a letter to the Marquise of Massa. Ercole lavished attention upon the queen dowager—lavishing her with gifts and trinkets while spending as much time in Milan with her as he possibly could. By 1548, Ercole had swept Beatriz entirely off her feet. They wed secretly at Santa Maria del Carmine; by late 1549, the secret was out when Beatriz discovered she was pregnant. The marriage was publicly solemnized at the ducal chapel by the Archbishop of Milan, and Beatriz soon adopted the style of Duchess of Ferrara, Modena, and Reggio—along with inviting Ercole II to share in the authority of the regency of Milan. Beatriz would give birth to a daughter named Isabella in the spring of 1550. At forty-six, Beatriz had not expected to remarry, let alone have another child—but she was beyond overjoyed. “Better a duchess in happiness and health,” Beatriz reportedly told one of her ladies. “Then a queen in tragedy and misery.” Beatriz’s ambition had not tempered—she still wished for her son to shine brighter than all the other Italian princes. But for the first time, Beatriz was content with her own life.

    With Filippo Emanuele nearing his fourteenth birthday, Beatriz knew it would soon be time for him to take a wife—either a Spanish princess or one of the emperor’s daughters. She settled upon a Spanish match for her son, accepting through the Treaty of Chiavari in 1549 that formally betrothed her son to the Spanish Infanta Leonor (b. 1540), who was Beatriz’s niece through her late sister Isabella. Though Leonor was still young, it was arranged that they would be wed shortly following the infanta’s twelfth birthday in 1552, allowing her to spend the final years of her education in Milan. Beatriz sent tutors to Spain to educate Leonor in Italian and etiquette. They even began to exchange letters—with Beatriz wishing to have a better relationship with Leonor than she had ever had in France with her other daughter-in-law, Isabelle. “We are daily waiting for the years to pass so that you might finally be able to join us,” Beatriz wrote in a honied letter to Leonor, dated in 1550. “My son treasures the miniature that your father sent, and already he has begun decorating your chambers, a most spacious suite of rooms that will adjoin his own…” Under Beatriz’s aegis, Milan became a glittering court—a Maestro di Stalla managed the stables, while the Cacciatore handled the court’s hunting excursions. The Maggiordomo di Palazzo managed the ducal household, while the duke’s chamber was managed by the Ciambello. Beatriz had her own separate household. “The birth of Milan’s court etiquette came through Duke Filippo’s installation as Duke of Milan. The household was reconstituted from scratch—mostly along French lines, as no ducal household had existed for nearly fifty years.” Filippo Emanuele formally attained his majority at the age of eighteen in 1553. Though Beatriz was allowed to retire from the regency, she was immediately appointed to the Consiglio Ducale, which served Milan’s privy council. Duke Filippo also invited his stepfather, the Duke of Ferrara to advise him on matters of state.

    SbON9Dt.jpeg

    Milan Embraces the Duke of Milan—Allegorical Fresco of Milan's Palazzo Ducale, c. 1570; AI Generated.

    If Milan represented Italy’s jewel, Parma represented a more provincial backwater. Though the Duchess of Plaisance did what she could to raise the standards in Parma, she understood her son occupied a small sovereign territory. Parma was less a city than a town, with some 20,000 souls—while the duchy possessed perhaps some 250,000 souls. “We have no true treasury to speak of,” Anne wrote piteously to her brother. “The annual revenues are piteous—some £20,000 per annum, with which I am expected to fund the court, carry out renovations, repairs, and new constructions, and pay our army. Our army is a mere 4000 men… perhaps five hundred of those are fit for fighting service as members of the ducal guard, former men of the Armée d’Italie… their costs alone consume over half the revenues…” Anne was forced to use her revenues from France to cover the numerous shortfalls. “It must be something we acquaint ourselves with,” Anne reportedly quipped to one of her ladies-in-waiting. “When I am but dust and gone, my son shall be forced to do the same.” While Beatriz could rest easy in Milan, Anne’s time in Parma was one of worry and anguish. “While Beatriz had left the misery of France for brighter pastures,” one historian wrote in the opening lines of Anne & Beatriz: The Rogues of Italy. “Anne’s experience was the opposite—losing her protector and benefactor, she left the protection of France for the unknown of Italy, where for the first time she had not won the first prize. Parma’s sovereignty was an important win, but its territory and wealth were a pittance compared to Milan and Genoa—who had the support of the Habsburgs behind them. Alone in an alien land that did not even recognize her faith. For perhaps the first time in her life, the cossetted maîtresse of François I faced her first ever genuine challenge.”

    South of Milan was the Kingdom of Naples—still secure under the rule of the House of Lorraine. By 1549, Louis IV—better known as Luigi IV, had sat on the Neapolitan throne for nearly twenty years. He had wed a Princess of France, Louise, and their match proved fecund, with two daughters, Francesca (b. 1536) and Claudia (b. 1542), and two sons, Renato (b. 1537) and Antonio (b. 1541). Two children had died young—Giovanna in 1538, shortly after birth, and Giovanni, who died in 1545 at the age of four. “Both the king and queen were in misery following the young prince’s death,” one lady-in-waiting to Louise wrote. “They wept and prayed together, but to no avail—while the king was made of sterner stuff and able to move forward, the queen could not. Delicate and shy, she was not meant for the public life of a consort… she withdrew into her chambers following the young prince’s death, complaining of maladies that struck at her head and her back like daggers cutting through the flesh. His Majesty did all he could for her, even staying at her side for her last moments. Three months after the death of the young prince, our queen perished as well.” It was said that Luigi was inconsolable at the death of his wife, whom he had been fond of. Louise was given an opulent funeral and was laid to rest in the Basilica of Santa Chiara. Louise was the first queen to be buried within the basilica since Giovanna of Naples in 1382—Luigi used the funeral to demonstrate his claims to Naples through the Angevin line. Shortly after, the king hired Pirro Ligorio as a royal architect—Luigi desired for Ligorio to not only construct a tomb for the late queen but also paint new frescoes within the basilica and update its Gothic interior. Luigi would spend some 250,000 ducats renovating Santa Chiara, which he intended to be the burial place of his dynasty. Though the Neapolitan line was secure, some within the king’s council pressed him to consider the possibility of remarriage. “You are yet young, sire,” Scipione Farinacci, the king’s chief councilor, cautioned. “More than that, the royal princes and princesses are still young—Signora Francesca is nine, and Signor Renato is eight; the youngest, Signor Antonio and Signora Claudia are six and three. You are a most august parent, but the kingdom’s demands also weigh upon you… what they shall need is a mother’s love and affection.” The king at first resisted these calls to remarry, reportedly chastising the council: “Her Majesty’s body is not yet cold, yet you already seek to replace her. Remember, sirs, the good that she did—and how well she treated all of you.”

    By 1547, the king relented and agreed to remarry—but he did not give the council a chance to find him a wife; instead, he announced before them that he did intend to wed again—and that his future wife and queen would be Isabella of Savoy—a maid of honor within Queen Louise’s former household. Isabella, born in 1529, was the daughter of Philippe of Savoy, better known as the Duke of Nemours, who had died shortly before her birth. Isabella was better known because of her mother, Bona Sforza—the Duchess of Bari and Princess of Rossano. Isabella’s parents had not wed for love—Bona wed Philippe at the late age of thirty-two to protect her lands and interests during the French occupation of Naples, though he had been proposed as a husband in her youth. Wed in 1526, Philippe had left Bona pregnant in 1528 and died five months later. Four months later, in early 1529, Isabella was born. Luigi IV had become king, and Bona felt secure as the widow of a prince aligned with France. Though she often attended court, she preferred to reside in her domains. Still, Isabella had been sent to court at a young age, and though the pretty girl had many suitors, her mother always hoped for a more extraordinary match. What was more extraordinary than the King of Naples?

    NU2e16P.jpeg

    Isabella of Savoy, c. 1547; AI Generated.

    “Bona, the Duchess of Bari, had once been a jewel of the Sforza dynasty,” one historian would write in their biography about Bona, titled Jewel of the Sforza. “She was considered as a consort for her cousin Massimiliano—a plan that collapsed following the French invasion of Italy in 1515 that deposed the Sforza in Milan for good. Other proposals came and failed—Guiliano de Medici, Ferdinand, the Prince of Asturias, and even Philippe of Savoy and Lorenzo de Medici, the Duke of Urbino… all these matches failed, and Bona languished in Bari, where she succeeded her mother in 1524 as Duchess of Bari. She quickly fell into conflict with the Spanish; the Viceroy of Naples, Hugo of Moncada, attempted to bully Bona into willing her territories into Spain, given her lack of an heir. He also solicited loans for his government in Naples that would eventually reach the sum of some 200,000 ducats. There also remained unsolved issues regarding the inheritance of her great-aunt, Joanna of Aragon, the late Queen of Naples: she had willed a significant portion of her fortune to Bona’s mother, but part was held by Charles V as King of Spain. When the French invaded Naples, she quickly threw her lot with them and was favorably rewarded; when Luigi IV became king, one of his first acts was to allow Bona to claim the whole of her great aunt’s inheritance that existed within Naples, which made her even wealthier. Still, she could not but hope that her daughter’s future might be more brilliant than her own—and that her daughter might marry a king.”

    It surprised very few that Bona Sforza’s daughter had triumphed as the prime candidate for the widowed king’s hand. “All know that the Duchess of Bari is perhaps one of the wealthiest women in the kingdom,” one courtier wrote in a gossipy letter. “If her daughter has truly secured the king’s affections, then the duchess shall give anything to see that her daughter becomes queen.” This proved prescient, as Bona offered a massive dowry of 350,000 ducats that dwarfed even what the king had received from France. The marriage contract was signed at Aversa in June 1547: the main stipulations centered around Bona Sforza’s landed domains. Luigi agreed that Isabella should have unrestricted inheritance of both Bari and Rossano when Bona died and that the domains would be administered by Isabella outside of the royal demesne for her life. In terms of the succession to Bona’s lands, the marriage agreement recognized that Isabella would pass the duchy either to her eldest son (or barring sons) to her eldest daughter—with the marriage of the future Duchess of Bari to be decided by the (future) King of Naples. If Isabella had no issue with the king, it was agreed that Isabella would recognize Renato, the king’s eldest son and heir, as her successor. Luigi and Isabella married several days later in a subdued ceremony at the Chapel of Santa Maria a Sicola in Naples.

    500px-Raphael_-_The_Miraculous_Draft_of_Fishes_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

    The Miraculous Draught of Fishes by Raphael as part of the Raphael Cartoons; c. 1515-16.

    In Rome, all concerned the newly elected Pope Adrian VI—formally Reginald Pole—who had triumphed in the 1549-50 Conclave. Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury and now mother of the pope, wrote a letter to Queen Mary when she discovered the news. “God is most truly gracious… I could have never imagined that one of my sons might have risen to such heights, let alone the glories of serving as our Holy Father and guiding our church. I am truly most content, madame.” The countess passed away a few months into Pope Adrian’s new reign in August 1550—several weeks before her seventy-sixth birthday. The election of Adrian VI represented a significant victory for the Spirituali, or evangelists—those who believed that their church and faith needed reform—primarily through spiritual renewal and a more internal focus on faith through scripture and justification by faith. Adrian’s victory dealt a blow to the more conservative Zelanti faction within the church, but it did not mean their destruction. Adrian entered his pontificate with some within the Roman Curia weary of his intentions, such as Cardinal Gian Pietro Carafa, who had sought to prevent Adrian VI’s election and failed. Carafa’s hatred and rivalry with the new pope was so intense that Carafa even began to believe that Adrian VI was a wolf that masqueraded as a sheep. “I believe firmly and fully with all my heart and soul,” Cardinal Carafa wrote to an associate. “That we have erred, and this election shall be a blemish upon our Holy Church until the end times. Holy Father, he may be, but he cannot be trusted. I know within my heart and soul that the man is a fraud and a Lutheran… he shall destroy us all if given the chance, and I refuse to let him do so.

    Adrian VI did not concern himself much with Carafa—in Adrian’s eyes, the man was merely a sore loser. One of Adrian’s first acts as pope was to reorganize the curia. He nominated as Cardinal-Nephew his nephew Arthur—eldest son of his younger brother, Geoffrey. Arthur was named Cardinal-Deacon with the titular church of Santa Maria in Cosmedin, which Adrian had previously held. Adrian VI took steps to delineate his nephew’s role within his papacy, writing to Arthur: “Know that I give you this honor for the glory of our church and not of our house. I shall lean upon you for your assistance; know that I shall reward you well for this but in line with your accomplishments. Do not think you shall reap riches merely upon your name and title alone.” Adrian VI immediately sought to make changes to the curia. Giovanni Morone was named Vice Chancellor, while Francesco Pisani was named Camerlengo. Giovanni Domenico de Cupis was named the first Cardinal-Secretary of State. The pope tasked Cardinal Cupis to serve as a tutor and instructor to his nephew. “Pope Adrian VI was deliberate in his choices—though he had spent nearly twenty years in Rome, he understood the Romans would see him as a foreigner and Englishman first and foremost.” one biographer of Adrian VI wrote. “He desired to surround himself with those cardinals who would support his views but who had established relationships within the church already.” Adrian VI’s first formal consistory was held in the Summer of 1550—he nominated not only his nephew Arthur Pole but Edigio Foscarari, Pietro Lippomano, Isidoro Chiari, and Girolamo Seripano—all men that held views within the bounds of the Spirituali. Another appointee was Cuthbert Tunstall, Archbishop of Canterbury—who was recognized as Crown-Cardinal of England and England’s first who was not an Italian. Robert de Croÿ, the Bishop of Cambrai, was also appointed alongside Jean Suau of France.

    Adrian VI placed very great importance upon the Council of Bologna. Though the council had been opened in the year previously by Gelasius III, his death shortly after its opening had robbed the church of needed initiative. The issue of Protestant attendance also remained up in the air. Though Charles V demanded that the German Protestants send a delegation to Bologna, many remained intransigent about attending a council in the heart of the Papal States. These matters were compounded in the fall of 1550 when an outbreak of the plague occurred in Bologna—leading Adrian to prorogue the council before it even truly opened to begin any deliberations. Adrian, intent on reopening the council before the end of 1551, decided that the council needed to be moved. Adrian received numerous suggestions and offers—some suggested moving the council into Germany; Charles V offered up Besançon alongside Konstanz as a possible location. François II incensed at the idea, threatened to host a national council in France and to embargo the export of gold to Rome if the council was moved to Germany. “A council in Germany would be dominated by schismatics and heretics,” François II wrote in an adamant letter to Adrian VI. “Remember well that France is the eldest daughter of the church; should you sacrifice our affection, you risk sacrificing our obedience as well.” François offered up the city of Arles and suggested that the pope consider moving the council to Avignon—ideas that also met the emperor’s rejection. “My son-in-law holds a knife at your throat and expects you to bow to his authority,” Charles V wrote to the pope. “You cannot hold the council in Arles or even Avignon—it will stink of French influence that damned the last council. The Protestants will not attend such a council. I cannot guarantee that German prelates would either… and if the Germans do not attend, you may be assured that the English and Spanish will also think otherwise, dooming your good intentions to another shuttered council.” The Venetians offered up Padua, but Adrian VI dismissed the offer with thanks. He remembered well the failures that had plagued the previous Council of Bologna—and the move to Verona did not fix them. In the end, Adrian secured an agreement with Lucerne to move the council there. “It cannot displease anyone,” Adrian VI wrote in a letter to Cardinal Morone. “Lucerne lays outside the dominions of the emperor and King of France; it is not in Italy, nor in Germany… more than that, the city and patricians have agreed to assist in financing the council, which will help matters greatly.” With plans to reopen the council, now known as the Council of Lucerne, Adrian appointed three new legates to attend: Niccolò Ardinghelli, Ercole Gonzaga, and Gasparo Contarini[1]. All three men were chosen not because of their wide breadth of knowledge and credentials but because of their firm belief that the Catholic Church needed reform—views that aligned with the pope’s own.

    Religious issues would largely dominate and overshadow Adrian’s pontificate. Despite this, Adrian VI attempted to implement fiscal and political reforms to the best of his ability. Adrian spent vast sums to expand Ancona’s port, which had been declared a free port in 1532. He also allowed Jews to continue to settle in Ancona as well as Rome—though the yellow badge was still strictly enforced. Adrian also sought to provide relief to the Conversanos and Marranos, who daily begged the Roman Curia for relief—paying vast sums for the privilege to beg like dogs. While Adrian VI dared not meddle in the affairs of Spain or Portugal, he made the gift of the islands of Ponza and Ventotene (uninhabited since medieval times) to the Iberian Jewish community residing in Rome for an annual rent of 6000 scudi. “Settle these islands and make them yours,” Adrian exhorted to the Jewish envoys. “They shall suit your needs perfectly—should you agree to live quietly, prosper, fortify them, and pay what you shall owe us each year, they are yours.” Adrian ensured that the Jews within the dominions of the church fell under his protection—and that they were solely under his own authority. Adrian also sought to balance out papal finances—he instituted measures of economy within the Papal Household while slightly increasing the nominal fees owed for dispensations and also to file suits within the Apostolic Camera. “While Pope Adrian VI’s fiscal policy was not without its issues,” one historian of Adrian’s policy wrote. “It made him the first pope of his era that attempted to deal with Rome’s unsettled financial situation. While Adrian VI might have simply accumulated more debt through the luoghi di monte like his predecessors (which he still did, to an extent), he truly attempted to bring about a change.” New direct taxes were also established to maintain the papal galleys and papal armies, while the gabella delle carne was introduced in 1552 as a direct tax on meat. Compared with previous Popes, Adrian attempted to work with the Roman Curia as best he could. While the curia was in no way returned to its former status as the Senate of the Roman Church; it enjoyed more input and influence over Papal policies than it had in previous pontificates—even if it was those aligned with Adrian’s VI’s policies who received the most benefit from this change.

    400px-Cranach_il_giovane%2C_allegoria_della_redenzione%2C_1557_01.JPG

    Allegory of Redemption, Lucas Cranach the Younger; c. 1557.

    As 1551 opened in Parma, Anne’s primary concern was to search for a wife for her son—who had recently attained his majority. “Though the young Duke of Parma possessed the blood of the House of Valois—it was from the wrong side of the blanket,” one historian would write. “Few Italian princes had the desired to attach themselves to the late King of France’s bastard—especially when the new interests of François II heralded the possibility of Italy shaking off the Italian yoke.” With the Duke of Ferrara’s marriage to Beatriz, any union with the House of Este was impossible. Not even the parvenus of Italy, the Medici expressed interest in such a union. “My wife is the bastard of an emperor,” Duke Lorenzo III uttered. “I shall not wed one of my daughters to the bastard of a king.” Eventually, Anne arranged for Ottavio to marry a daughter of the Lord of Monaco, Francesca Grimaldi (b. 1536), through the Treaty of Piacenza signed in June 1551. Ottavio would wed his Monégasque bride in the spring of 1552 in grand style at the Palazzo del Governatore, which the court currently occupied. “The Duchess of Plaisance wished for her son’s wedding to be an opulent affair,” the Rogues of Italy continued. “She spared no expense—some £5000 was raised through an extraordinary tax in Parma (to great discontent and grumbling), while she would expend another £25,000 of her own funds, which she ordered sent to a Florentine bank from France, fearing the Genoese might not be as helpful. Though the wedding was grand, Beatriz sought to outdo her rival everywhere… it was rumored that some £60,000 alone was spent on the Duke of Milan’s wedding to his young Spanish bride held in the same year, which included a religious ceremony at the Cathedral of Milan and massive feasts and celebrations at the Palazzo Ducale which lasted for several days and included many dignitaries, with many Italian ambassadors attending on behalf of their masters and offering felicitations to the newly married couple. In contrast, the wedding of the Duke of Parma was grand, if not subdued—attended primarily by the gentry and nobility of the duchy.” Though the Duke of Parma was now wed and had assumed the government over his duchy, Anne remained in Parma as a valuable source of support, despite her desire to return to France. “So long as he wishes for me to be here, so I shall stay,” Anne told her sister Marie. “In truth, I cannot leave so long as the Portuguese harpy breathes… were I to retire to France tomorrow, the next day, my son would be dead. The late king fought for him to receive this duchy… I will not allow it to be lost so long as I am alive…”

    The early 1550s represented a flourishing period for the Italian peninsula. “Little more than serviles, we have been trampled and crumpled under the boot of the French,” An Italian pamphleteer, Niccolò Franco, wrote in Il Secondo Raptio (The Second Rape), a pamphlet published in 1552 that attacked French influence in Italy. “Robbed, beaten, corrupted: we are once more the Sabines at the mercy of a mighty Rome, without its true luster.” Such political tracts attacking the French became increasingly common at the start of the decade, primarily coming out of Milan and other Italian cities, such as Ferrara, Florence, and even Rome. Niccolò Franco, once in the service of the Duke of Mantua, was invited to enter Milanese service. Beatriz provided Franco with a pension of 300 scudi and named him cameriere di camera within her son’s household. There was a revival in Italian culture, and many Italian artists and musicians saw themselves as patriots—viewing their culture under attack by the dominion of France. “The French are leeches and always have been,” one Italian musician reportedly wrote in a letter. “The refinement and elegance for which they are known for come from us… when they descended upon us in 1494, they were no better than barbarians. They have claimed our art, music, and heritage as their own…” France’s position in Italy following the death of François I had greatly shifted; François II saw the matter of Italy as finished and following the cessation of Milan and Genoa to Filippo Emmanuele and that of Parma to Ottavio, he ordered the French administration in Italy scaled down. “Italy has been conquered,” François II wrote in his private diary. “It is chained to us through our princes and men, and it shall always be. Italy was my father’s dream; It is finished. I dream instead of Artois and Franche-Comté, dominions that by right belong to my wife (and myself) but which have been denied to us for nearly twenty years. I strive for France’s greatness before all things.”

    400px-Veronese_Allegory_of_Wisdom_and_Strength.jpg

    Allegory of Wisdom and Strength, Paolo Veronese; c. 1555.

    In 1547, François II signed the Treaty of Novara with the Duke of Savoy—returning to Carlo III the dominions he had lost nearly ten years before—though Carlo was forced to recognize French influence over Saluzzo, held by Michele II, son of the late Marquis Francesco Ludovico. A year later, in 1549, François II abolished the French governorships in Milan and Genoa, ending the parallel governments that had hereto existed in both regions since 1547. François II ordered the recall of French administrators from both areas, allowing the Milanese regency to appoint their own officials for the first time. These changes were soon followed by reductions in the 1550s of the Armée d’Italie. “French finances were in poor shape in the early reign of François II—owing to the profligacy of his father,” one historian wrote. “When François Ier died, French annual revenues stood at nearly seven million livres—but they were swallowed almost completely by the late king’s debts: he owed nearly seven million alone to financiers in Lyons; some three million was owed to the city of Paris through the Bureau de Ville, and debts accumulated from the wars of 1536 and 1542 totaled almost four million.”

    While François could restructure and reschedule some of his father’s debts in 1550, his financial situation remained dire. Though he introduced financial innovations to the Maison du Roi, one of the king’s councilors, Henri de Saint-Priest d’Épinac, attacked the bloated Armée d’Italie as a source of the king’s financial woes. “Men of France are garrisoned from Milan to Calabria, sire. It is the Armée d’Italie which is an anchor about your neck,” a letter from Saint-Priest to François II began—with the second part detailing alleged monthly expenses. “Officer’s Wages—£63,000. Soldier’s Wages—£50,000. Supplies—£38,000. Horses—£20,000. Gunpowder—£18,000. This great army costs Your Majesty some two million livres per annum. To restore the treasury, expenses in Italy must be lessened considerably.” François II paid heed to Saint-Priest’s suggestions: in 1550, garrisons in Naples were ordered to be drastically reduced. In 1551, François planned with Adrian VI to restore the port of Civitavecchia to the pope. French garrisons in central Italy were also drastically curtailed—those at Bologna, Ferrara, and Florence were dissolved completely, leaving a force of some 3000 men that would be based instead in Parma—retained only at the behest of the Duchess of Plaisance. By 1553, François II ordered the headquarters of the Armée d’Italie shifted to Alessandria, granted to them by the Duke of Milan. By 1553, the army in Lombardy now numbered some 11,000 men, its posture shifted from conquest to defense. “The Armée d’Italie should function as an instrument of security, not of conquest,” François II wrote again in his diaries. “It must be augmented by the troops of our Italian vassals and friends—Italians should bleed for Italy, not Frenchmen.” It indeed represented a kind thought—though perhaps not a realistic one when the Duke of Milan, despite being a French prince, looked instead to his Habsburg cousins for succor in place of his French brother. It was not a unique thought—and by 1553, many others in Italy felt the same.
     
    Chapter 42. The Imperial Division
  • Chapter 42. The Imperial Division
    1549-1555; Germany & Spain.

    “The wonderful inheritance of these provinces which passed into my hands
    nearly forty years ago have been well governed by you for nearly twenty.
    I now pass them unto you as agreed upon… know that no prince has
    ever had as fine a brother as I ever had in your person.”
    — Charles V’s Deathbed Testament, 1555.


    Musical Accompaniment: Circumdederunt me Gemitus Mortis

    450px-Portrait_of_Charles_V%2C_Holy_Roman_Emperor%2C_seated_%281500%E2%80%931558%29%2C_formerly_attributed_to_Titian_%28Alte_Pinakothek%2C_Munich%29.jpg

    Portrait of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, c. 1548.

    The defeat of the Protestant rebels in 1548 had placed Charles V at his most remarkable epoch. Not only had he sufficiently cowed the Protestant party and pressed for their inclusion into a general council, but he also succeeded in the dreams long harbored by his Burgundian ancestors. The imperial dominions of the Low Countries had been reorganized as the Kingdom of Burgundy. Burgundy was granted electoral status, while imperial authority in northern and central Germany had been reestablished after decades of reduction. “The early years of Charles V are often remembered for their disasters,” one historian wrote in his biography of the emperor. “The Spanish revolts, the Battle of Lodi, loss of Naples… all are remembered as low points of his reign—and the emperor is poorly regarded in most Spanish historiography as a monarch who ignored them for the pursuits of an empire. Despite these losses, the 1540s represented the high point of the emperor’s reign through his reforms within the Holy Roman Empire—rendering him better regarded among German and Italian historians.” The Diet of Augsburg closed in 1548 without issues—it would be followed in 1549 by the Diet of Frankfurt, where Charles’ son and heir, Maximilian of Bohemia, was formally elected as King of the Romans. This recognized Maximilian formally as his father’s successor—and would allow him to succeed as Holy Roman Emperor upon his father’s demise.

    In the summer of 1549, Charles returned to the Low Countries—accompanied by his son and his daughter-in-law. Maximilian had appointed Jan IV Popel as Bohemia’s Supreme Burgrave to serve as Bohemia’s viceroy and governor in his (and the queen’s) absence. “His Majesty reached Brussels in July 1549,” one burgher wrote in a letter to his family. “Accompanied by the King and Queen of the Romans, the emperor’s heir was granted a Joyous Entry into the capital… they proceeded to the Palace of Coudenburg, where the emperor had assembled the notables of Burgundy. Before them all, he declared that his son would be recognized as the Archduke of Brabant as heir to the Kingdom of Burgundy—among his more numerous (and prestigious) titles.” Though the Reformatio Imperii, Charles V had used the Privilegium Maius to name his children as Princes of Burgundy—but had also ensured that the heir to the kingdom would bear the title of Archduke of Brabant. Though the emperor was happily received in Brussels, one thorny issue remained unresolved—that of Empress Renée, still in exile at the Hof van York in Mechelen. “Empress Renée endured two difficult years in purgatory following the discovery of her Protestant faith,” one of Renée’s biographers wrote. “Held incommunicado at the Hof van York, she was kept under scrutiny and forced to attend Catholic masses. During the emperor’s time abroad, she was regularly visited by Inquisitor Tapper, who encouraged her to recant.” Renée remained stubbornly defiant, declaring to Tapper: “Here is where I stand, and where I shall always stand; I am as steadfast in my beliefs as you believe in yours.” Despite her bold declaration, matters would soon reach a crescendo.

    Upon Charles’ return to Brussels, many within his council pressed him to deal with the matter of the empress, which had now become a festering wound. Some, such as Perrenot, argued that a formal complaint should be lodged before the Inquisition, allowing Renée to be charged and to let the emperor escape a marriage that had become odious to him. Others, such as Viglius van Ayatta and even his son Maximilian, argued that the emperor should practice leniency by seeking the empresses’ recantation without an ecclesiastical trial. Maximilian especially feared that any formal trial would only embolden the Protestant Party, who had, after all, been granted limited liberties before the general council could be convened. It was a complicated matter that split the council, though all of them agreed that issues could not continue as they had in the previous two years. “Empress Renée’s imprisonment is the scandal of Europe and the Christendom,” Prince Arianitto Comène stated in an address to the council. “All know of her imprisonment and the reasons, yet our ambassadors are asked for answers they cannot provide daily. We have dithered for too long, and a conclusion must be reached. His Majesty is seen as a monster, a brute, a fool—and worse, a man who cannot control his wife or household. We must regain the initiative and show the emperor is in full control of the situation, or else we lose all we have worked towards.” The matter worried Charles greatly—he poured his worries and frustrations into a letter to his brother, Ferdinand: “This matter has weighed daily upon my head. I know it must be dealt with—and my waiting has not helped matters. Were she any other heretic, she would be dealt with as she ought to be. But this one is not any other—she is my lady wife and my empress.”
    400px-Clouet_Renata_Ferrara.JPG

    Renée of France, Holy Roman Empress; Woodcut c. 1570s.

    Ferdinand encouraged his brother to trust his faith: “You know within your heart of hearts, with God’s grace, what you must do. Trust in Christ, for he never gives us unnecessary burdens; all handed to us is given to overcome. Yes, she is your lady wife—but she has erred in the teachings of our Holy Church and has embraced the filth of Calvin and Luther. Allow the Inquisition to do its work, for all are equal before God… empress. Trust that God shall bring about the right resolution. Should you waver, think only of our august grandmother, Isabella of Castile—all she has done for our faith has fallen to us as her successors. We cannot err now—you must judge Renée as Isabella once judged Boabdil and his ilk.” In early 1550, Charles formally lodged an accusation against Renée with the Inquisition. Though Inquisitor Ruard Tapper had previously led the investigation against the empress, his methods were judged too soft. One letter from Charles to the Roman Curia said only: “Ensure that Her Majesty is seen by Inquisitor Titelmans, not Tapper.” Compared to Tapper, who believed in spiritual solutions, Pieter Titelmans was a notorious inquisitor previously active in Flanders who considered rooting out heresy his top priority. In March 1550, Renée was arrested by Titelmans at the Hof van York in Mechelen.

    Titelmans ordered Renée transferred to Gravensteen, where she was imprisoned within the citadel. Titelmans conducted his first interrogation of the empress there sometime in April 1550. He wasted no time writing to the emperor: “Your Majesty—it is with great sorrow that I must announce that the empress is a most notorious heretic. By this crime, she has not only forfeited all her possessions but your affection as well.” Renée had endured two years of danger since the discovery of her faith, and though she had not seen her children in all that time, it was Titelmans mocking jape that the empress would never see her children again that caused her to falter. “I collapsed to the ground,” Renée would later write in her private journals—many years later. “Two years of purgatory, danger, and fear had greatly weakened my resolve… made only worse when I was transferred to Gravensteen. I feared that I might die, and as much as I might have welcomed it, there remained a small speck within me that desired to live. My faith had been tested beyond all manner of things; when the awful inquisitor proclaimed that I would never see my children again, I could not help but cry out: ‘Do not allow me to be parted from my children any longer than I have been already monsieur!’ He said only what he had said from the beginning—that I must recant and accept the error of my ways… and so I did. On condition of being reunited with my children, I signed my confession and admitted my errors… all the while, within my mind and my heart, God spoke and urged me forward. Survive, he told me—survive, and all shall be well in five years. Five years of submission seemed but a small price to pay, so I closed my heart and mind to all that I knew and believed to be true. I allowed God, and only God, to guide me in the next six years going forward.”

    Renée formally signed her confession in May 1550, returning (at least nominally) to the Catholic Church. While Renée would never again attend mass, her position was restored. Though Charles was pleased to put the matter behind him, the situation had completely altered the relationship that had hereto existed between the emperor and empress. “I am most glad that you have seen the error of your ways, madam,” Charles wrote in a terse letter to Renée, dated from May 1550. “But it cannot change that I have seen a piece of you that I wish had never seen. Your mischief has caused great trouble and pain—not only to me but to our children. Though you have recanted, I must be frank that my views have not changed: I continue to desire that you should live apart from me, and I am pleased to allow you to retain the Hof van York for your personal use. As for the children—I shall allow you to have custody of Adélaïde and Jean.” While Renée’s recantation could not fix that which had already been shattered, she was able to escape with her neck intact. For Renée’s children with the emperor, the situation was complicated. Her eldest daughter, Anne (b. 1533), was a staunch Catholic who had been hastily wed to Theodor of Bavaria in 1548—she expressed no desire to speak or have contact with her mother, and Anne would never reconcile with her mother. Renée’s eldest son, Charles (b. 1535), had been ripped from her household and placed into the care of Cardinal Waldburg, the Prince-Bishop of Augsburg, who was already grooming the young prince for a clerical career. Likewise, Michèle (b. 1538), Renée’s youngest daughter with the emperor, had been placed into a convent—and out of her reach. This left only Adélaîde and Jean—Charles agreeing that rejoining their mother’s household was a small price to have peace within his dominions and to ensure the Protestants had no cannon fodder to use against him in this delicate time. Nevertheless, all knew that eyes were sat upon the Hof van York, and both children retained their Catholic tutors, and Catholic religious services were regularly held, which they attended.

    With the election of Adrian VI in 1550, Charles V’s concerns in the later portion of his reign would center around bringing the general council promised by Gelasius III to fruition. Initially opened in Bologna in 1549, problems in 1550 saw Adrian VI shift the council to Lucerne—along with the appointment of fresh legates who would oversee the council. Though Charles had aided in Adrian’s election, this did not mean that some concerns lingered among certain prelates and theologians attached to the imperial court. “Cardinal Carafa spewed his venom far and wide across Europe, seeking an audience to all who might listen,” one theologian attached to the imperial court at Brussels wrote. “While some saw him as a man who had been humbled, others perhaps saw half-truths amid his lies: certainly, there were concerns around the pope’s intentions at Lucerne—matters made little better by his first cardinal appointments and his legatine appointments.” Charles, at least, was prepared to trust the man he had helped elect—the emperor seeing Adrian VI as the only man perhaps capable of reunifying the splintered Christendom. While the Protestants remained wary of the church’s intentions, they had little choice following their military defeat. Charles allowed the Protestants relative freedom in assembling a delegation to Lucerne; he asked that the Elector Palatine and his son, the King of Romans, oversee the task, while final confirmation would be in his aegis. The Protestant delegation from Germany would include notable theologians such as Philipp Melanchthon, Johann Brenz, and Nicolaus von Amsdorf, among others.

    400px-Willem_Key_-_Portrait_of_a_member_of_de_Croy_family%2C_portrayed_1547%2C_aged_56.jpg

    Portrait of a member of the Cröy Family (Believed to be the Bishop of Cambrai), c. 1548.

    Charles also assembled a Catholic delegation to represent his interests at Lucerne. Headed by Robert de Croÿ, the Bishop of Tournai, the Catholic deputation would include notable prelates such as Julius von Pflug, the Bishop of Naumburg, alongside the Archbishops of Cologne, Mainz, and Trier. This also included notable Catholic theologians: in the suite of the Bishop of Tournai was a fiery Dutch Jesuit known as Cornelius Becanus, alongside men such as Johann Gropper and Franciscus Sonnius. “His Majesty wasted no expense on his delegation to the council in Lucerne,” one chronicle of Charles’ court stated. “He ordered that they should have the freshest and fastest horses available in their travels through the empire to Lucerne and arranged for his delegation to have a monthly subsidy to cover costs for lodging, food, and other expenses while staying in Lucerne.” Such generosity did not extend to the Protestant delegation—they were instead forced to raise funds from among the Protestant princes—the Saxon Estates alone agreed to provide some 6000 thalers to cover the delegation’s expenses despite protests from the newly entrenched elector Severin, who was a staunch Roman Catholic. “Who can truly say how these matters may turn out?” one member of Melanchthon’s suite wrote in a letter to his brother. “While the emperor prepares a most generous dowry for his Catholic envoys, we beg for crumbs. Shall we even be able to reach Leipzig, let alone Lucerne?” The King of Romans alleviated troubles among the Protestant delegation by asking that the Bohemian Diet extend funding, with a Hussite delegation to attend with the Protestants.

    Despite Charles’ generosity, he was forced to confront his financial issues. By 1550, the emperor’s debts totaled 18 million ducats—mainly incurred from the numerous wars fought during his reign and owed primarily to German banking houses such as the Fuggers and Weslers. The 1530s saw a severance of the imperial administration from that of Spain. As Ferdinand took further control over the Spanish kingdoms, Charles’ own administration became increasingly Burgundian, with its outlook focused on the Low Countries and the empire. By the end of his reign, Charles received no financial support from the Spanish dominions he was nominally king of. He was supported wholly by the revenues of his hereditary dominions and what he received from the empire. “By 1550, the imperial treasury was in a fractious state,” one financial historian wrote. “Charles V borrowed enormous amounts from the German bankers who allowed him to do so because of his political situation… it was not uncommon for the emperor to defer payments rather than pay them back; he utilized short-term agreements where he leveraged future revenues and more long-term agreements. By the end of his reign, he had borrowed 29 million ducats from German banking houses… interest alone caused the total amount owed to swell to 38 million.” In some cases, Charles leveraged his outstanding debts to pay off more urgent debts. In 1553, Charles made his final £50,000 payment to England, which allowed him to redeem both Dunkirk and Gravelines—a payment made possible by Charles leasing out four years of Antwerp’s customs duties to the Brussels Branch of the Cromwell Company, an English trading syndicate whose influence had begun to grow throughout the 1550s. This allowed Charles to clear his debts to his English cousin, dating back nearly forty years.

    Maximilian and Elisabeth settled in the Low Countries following his crowning as King of the Romans. Maximilian’s marriage to Elisabeth had also proved quite fruitful. By 1555, Maximilian had five living children—Marie (b. 1545), Philippe (b. 1550), Marguerite (b. 1551), Frédéric (b. 1553) and Catherine (b. 1554). Charles offered Maximilian and his growing family use of Coudenburg Palace, but by the mid-1550s, Maximilian desired to have his own seat as King of the Romans and Archduke of Brabant. The Estates General proved eager to aid Maximilian in these endeavors and provided funding for the building of a Hôtel Particulier in the Sablon district of Brussels, which would become known as the Hôtel de Saint-André, but more commonly known as the Hôtel de l’Archiduc. Aside from this, Maximilian also began the construction of a palace of his own on the outskirts of Brussels known as the Palais de Ixelles. The palace at Ixelles, a blend of Flemish, Italian, and German Mannerist architecture, was commonly known as the Palais Romains in honor of the King of the Romans, who played a hand in laying its first stones.

    600px-De_beurs_van_Antwerpen_in_1531.jpg

    The Antwerp Bourse, built in 1531.

    Despite imperial financial issues, the Low Countries remained economically prosperous—a land of commerce and merchants that provided the bulk of imperial revenues. By the 1550s, Dutch merchants traded throughout Scandinavia and the Baltic, competing against Hanseatic merchants. Great wealth poured into the ports of the Low Countries—it included not only the grains and furs carried into port by Dutch merchants and sailors but also the exotic goods that flowed into the Low Countries through the Portuguese Feitoria in Antwerp—silk, spices, and the glories of East Asia. The Antwerp Bourse opened in 1531 as the world’s first commodities exchange and also served as a critical entrepot of foreign trade in the Low Countries, where merchants across Europe sold and traded goods. Imperial taxes were levied upon such trades, which also helped to restore coffers that had long been impoverished. Other occupations throughout the Low Countries were still strictly regulated through the long-existent guild system, and guilds existed for various groups, from tailors and bakers to even artists and sculptors.

    Charles had begun to suffer from ill health starting in the 1540s. In 1544, Charles suffered an injury to his leg at Châtillion-sur-Marne 1544 that would cause him issues for the remainder of his life. Following the Bruderkrieg and the emperor’s retirement to the Low Countries in 1549, he seldom traveled far beyond Brussels—and when he did, it was often by carriage or a sedan chair. The emperor’s health issues were further complicated by gout. Though the emperor had suffered such attacks as early as 1528, they became more frequent as he became older and primarily attacked his hands, legs, and shoulder. “Summoned by His Majesty last night, as well as this morning and afternoon,” Cornelius van Baersdorp, personal physician to the emperor, wrote in his diary. “He has suffered most terribly from this latest attack, made no better by his preferences for great feasts… despite my remonstrances, he continues to indulge himself in repasts of game, pastries, and wines and shows no interest in altering his diet… instead I have prescribed him a drachm of rhubarb, mushroom, and cassia and a poultice of lavender, valerian, and watermint.” Charles was not the best patient for a doctor to have—aside from often disobeying his doctor’s orders, he frequently sought quick fixes. Despite having the best medical care available, Charles would give an eager ear to any quack or charlatan who promised a quick recovery using panaceas, often exotic remedies brought to Europe from America and Asia. In one situation, Charles attempted to use the guaiac bark from a West Indian tree to treat his gout; in another, he pressed for using China root over traditional remedies.

    Charles_de_Groux_-_The_death_of_Charles_V.jpg

    Death of Charles V, 19th Century Historical Painting.

    Charles’ health declined drastically throughout the early 1550s, primarily due to his refusal to adhere to medical advice. Aside from gout, he became increasingly inflicted with neuralgia in his extremities. Doctors also noted a persistent sweet odor within the emperor’s urine—something which today might be recognized as a possible symptom of diabetes. In the summer of 1554, the emperor suffered a mild stroke; he was rendered bedridden for several months but could resume his state duties by the winter. “We continue to remonstrate with His Majesty to be more mindful of matters,” van Baersdorp noted in another entry. “Even the King of Romans has been asked to intercede, to no avail. The emperor continues to suffer from increasingly painful attacks of gout, and my remedies are increasingly ineffective… I have given him yet more concoctions, but I have also advised him of the reality of his situation.” By the beginning of 1555, the emperor’s health had not improved and continued to decline. Maximilian and Elisabeth had formally moved into the Coudenburg Palace to provide solace to the ailing emperor. Even Renée begged to see the emperor again in 1555—he finally agreed to meet her in April, shortly around their twenty-fifth wedding anniversary. “His Majesty was but a shell of his former self,” Renée wrote in her diary years later. “At this juncture, I had not seen him in nearly seven years. I did not ask for his absolution—merely to provide his blessing to his children, who remained in my care—Adélaïde and Jean. This he readily provided… I stayed with him for some two hours, during which we discussed the recent death of his mother, Joanna, and reminisced over our earliest years together. I must admit that the meeting was sorrowful, and I shed tears on his behalf….” Charles begged Renée to continue to love their children—those in her care and those without—and to provide any guidance to Maximilian as future emperor. When Renée departed Brussels in late April 1555, Maximilian gave her permission for the empress and her children to take up residence at the Château of Corroy near Gembloux rather than returning to Mechelen. Up until the end, the emperor daily begged for news from Lucerne—where news regarding the possible reunification of the Catholic Christendom had become increasingly bleak.

    Charles clung to life throughout the first weeks of May before expiring on June 5, 1555. Upon his death, the emperor’s will and testament was read out before the court at Coudenburg: “As a young man, I stood for the candidacy of the imperial crown… not to increase my possessions, but to engage myself vigorously in procuring the welfare not only of Germany but of my other realms and dominions, in hopes of bringing peace to the Christendom and unifying our cause against the Ottoman Turks. I admit that I was too bogged down in pursuing glory against the King of France… against my enemies, I accomplished what I could. Still, success in war lies only in the hands of God, and though he has seen fit to have granted me victory in my old age, such victories were denied to me in my youth. I confess that I have not been an altogether perfect sovereign—in Spain, I know my name will likely be covered in ignominy for my youthful errors—only through the good work of my brother was my throne in that land saved and secured and that is why he shall succeed me there, as I agreed so many years before. I can only hope my reign has been more successful here in the Low Countries and in Germany. It is with great regret that I pass beyond the veil without knowing what we have wrought, but I hope that I shall leave behind dominions secure and more prosperous than they were when I inherited them. I beg all present that hear my words to know that I strived only to be a sovereign who would be well remembered and well beloved by his subjects—know that my errors and mistakes are my own and were made unknowingly and not out of malice. I leave behind my dominions in the Low Countries, the Kingdom of Burgundy, to my eldest son, Maximilian—King of the Romans and King of Bohemia. I beseech the electors to duly elect him as your emperor and hope he shall serve you better than I have. I remonstrate with my son… be mindful of your subjects, work only for their welfare, peace, and prosperity. If you must learn from my mistakes, I beg that you live peacefully amongst your neighbors and make war less than I had. I ask also that you be thriftier with your finances; do not seek to emulate me through great debt.”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 43. The Council of Lucerne
  • I thought our next chapter might take a bit longer, but honestly... this was not a fun chapter for me to write. I started it today and just wanted it to be over with. Theology and the minutae of it all does not interest me all that much, to be quite honst. I tried to cover this section in as much detail as I could, while ending in the way that I intended. I hope you all enjoy: watch the last feeble attempt at trying to hold the Latin Christendom together, and watch in horror as it falls apart.

    Chapter 43. The Council of Lucerne
    1551-1556; Switzerland.

    “It has served us well, this myth of Christ.”
    — Apocryphal Quote, attributed to Pope Leo X.


    Musical Accompaniment: Missa Papae Marcelli

    reginald-pole-as-adrian-vi-following-his-election.jpg

    Reginald Pole as Adrian VI, Pope-Elect, c. 1550; AI Generated.

    The troubles surrounding the opening of a General Council plagued the end of the papacy of Gelasius III alongside the early years of Pope Adrian VI. Though Bologna was initially chosen to host this monumental occasion, in 1550, the council was eventually transferred to Lucerne within the Swiss Confederacy—with its opening deferred until 1551. Pope Adrian VI, an advocate of the Spirituali, saw this as his chance to make a difference in the church that he cherished and considered his home—he had chosen delegates to represent him who would espouse his own ideas and advocate for his own changes. Despite this, the Roman curia in the early years of Adrian’s reign remained heavily conservative: this did not even begin to account for the Roman episcopate and clergy across Europe, who, on the whole, expressed little interest in a reunion with the Protestants—by the 1550s, many bishops and priests looked upon the Protestants as heretics who had torn the Christendom asunder—not misguided sheep that needed to be brought back into the fold. This alone represented trouble for Adrian VI—not to mention issues that stemmed from the Zelanti faction headed by Cardinal Carafa. Carafa was undoubtedly the most outspoken and firmly believed that Adrian VI was a crypto-Lutheran intent on the destruction of the church. While others among the Zelanti were more tepid in their beliefs, they certainly had concerns over the council and the Pope’s intentions.

    Plans for the formal opening of the council were set for 1551, though plans dragged throughout the year. The papal legates, Niccolò Ardinghelli, Ercole Gonzaga, and Gasparo Contarini, did not formally arrive in Lucerne until November 1551—and even then, they were among the first to arrive. “Pope Adrian’s legates have received a grand welcome,” one burgher of Lucerne wrote in a letter to a business associate. “Their baggage train alone included grand chests holding their vestments, and two carts alone were dedicated to carrying theological tomes from Rome and Bologna…” Slowly, a trickle of prelates began to pour into Lucerne—primarily from Italy. Given the previous failures in opening such a council and the problems that had hounded it since 1549, it was little surprise that many Catholic sovereigns had adopted a wait-and-see attitude regarding the Council of Lucerne. When the council formally opened in January 1552, only around thirty bishops were in attendance. The imperial delegation did not arrive until the spring of 1552—this was shortly followed by the Spanish delegation, which included several members of the School of Salamanca as well as Vasco de Quiroga—Bishop of Michoacán in New Spain, who brought with him a train of Indian servants who were exhibited to the court. This was shortly followed by other delegations from across Europe—England’s included men such as Richard Pate, the Bishop of Worcester, and George Dowdall, Archbishop of Armagh. Alexander IV of Scotland sent a delegation headed by Henry Gordon, the Bishop of Galloway—rumored to be a former lover of the king. Other delegations soon followed, from Portugal to Poland.

    The arrival of prelates from across Europe caused the population of Lucerne to swell. This contributed not only to the issue of housing and living quarters but food costs as well—which soared as the city continued to swell with clerical visitors from abroad. “My maid has spent the morning scouring the markets,” a Lucerne burgess wrote in a letter to a friend. “A pound of sausage cannot be found for less than one pfennig, and the quality is often atrocious… the best beef now costs nearly three pfennige, while the whitest loaves of bread cost nearly two. Even wine has soared in price and costs nearly two groschen…” While stressors were placed upon segments of Lucerne’s population—primarily its poorest—others could profit, from bakers, butchers, and even farmers from the outlying regions to innkeepers and landlords, who could charge a premium to the foreign clergy. While those sent to Lucerne by the Pope received subsidies directly from the papal treasury, other delegations were subsidized by the sovereigns who had sent them. Queen Mary was believed to have provided an outlay of £6000 to care for the needs of her English prelates; João III of Portugal provided some 5000 cruzados, while Sigismund II of Poland interceded with the Polish Sejm to give a subsidy of 4000 zloty.

    Hugo_Vogel_Luther_Wartburg.jpg

    Martin Luther preaching at Wartburg.

    While the Catholics had formal delegations sent by both the Pope and the various crowned heads of Europe, the same could not be said of the Protestants. Chares V arranged for a Protestant delegation to be formed in Germany, overseen by his son and the Elector of the Palatinate—Friedrich II. Friedrich II died in 1550—he was succeeded by his underage son, Friedrich III—which placed him under the regency of his mother, the Electress Anna of Cleves, sister of the Duke of Cleves. “I ask that you consider heading the delegation to Lucerne,” a letter from the Electress to Philip Melancthon began. “With Luther’s death, you are the head of your faith and party within the empire—and you are best fit to represent us.” Though Melanchthon and several other prominent Protestants made up the delegation, they were primarily Lutherans—pressed to attend because of the defeat of the Lutherans in the Bruderkrieg. A small delegation of Hussite clergy from Bohemia was organized to participate at the wishes of Maximilian—but with the agreement that the Consistory of Prague would retain the final say over any agreements reached at Lucerne. Even the idea of a Protestant delegation did cause a furor among the German Protestants; Gnesio-Lutherans, who adhered more strictly to Luther’s teachings, attacked Melanchthon as a heretic and decried his attempts to reach a compromise with the imperial party and the Catholic Church. “Gnesio-Lutherans saw no good in the interim that the emperor had imposed following his military victory,” one historian would write. “While Melanchthon did not accept it either, many within the Gnesio camp believed that Melanchthon’s desire to compromise represented a darker undercurrent—and that he would drag all the good that Luther had done down into the dirt.”

    Outside of the empire, Protestants viewed the Council of Lucerne dimly. Jean Calvin and his followers in Geneva expressed no interest in the proceedings at Lucerne. Calvin would publish a series of tracts attacking the council, which he called his antidotes. In Hungary, Queen Dowager Anna, serving as regent for her young son Vladislaus II, barred Hungarian prelates from attending Lucerne under the penalty of death. In the portion of Hungary that had recognized Elisabeth as queen, the beginnings of the Protestant Church Order organized in the 1530s remained functioning, and Maximilian made no attempts to organize a Hungarian delegation. In Sweden, too, no attempt was made to organize a group to attend Lucerne—the Riksdag met at Norrköping in 1552, which once again reaffirmed Sweden’s independence from the See of Rome and made the act of colluding with Rome as treason, punishable by death.

    Though the Protestants had been promised the right to attend, one of the first major arguments was that they should receive the right to vote—on parity with the bishops in attendance. Other demands were that they should be included in all discussions, that decisions should be based solely upon scripture—and that neither the Pope nor his legates should head the council—and that the Pope himself should be subject to the council’s decrees. “Almost immediately, Pope Adrian was confronted with a crisis in Lucerne,” one council historian wrote. “They expected that the Protestants should attend as the cowed and defeated—not that they should have a right to debate and vote on proceedings.” Even more than that, there remained the thorny issue of justification—while some, such as Adrian VI and his legates, were sympathetic to the idea of Sola Fide as interpreted by the Protestants and even some writers of the Early Church, such as Clement of Rome, it ran counter to the ideas of the Catholic Church for over a millennium—for many, justification by faith alone was impossible. The Protestant delegation led by Melanchthon continued to maintain that justification was their red line: they would accept no decrees by the Council of Lucerne without a ruling that justification by faith alone was possible. Rather than dig into the thorny issue, Adrian wrote urgently to his legates: “The matter of justification must be delayed for as long as possible… let us not dig into the matters that divide us, but rather those that unite us.” It was agreed that Bishops would have the right to vote alongside the superior generals of mendicant orders. Envoys and theologians would receive no vote. Regarding the Protestant delegation, it was agreed that they should have the right to address the council in so-called Congregation sessions, but they would have no formal voting rights. Their right to attend Lucerne was affirmed, and they were granted protections to defend their right to do so—but the Catholic camps in attendance expressed little interest in granting the defeated Protestants their so-called demands.

    500px-Concilio_Trento_Museo_Buonconsiglio.jpg

    Council of Lucerne, 16th Century Painting.

    In 1553, cracks were exposed to the idea of a general Christian council—nearly thirty-five years had expired since Martin Luther had posted his theses. The Protestants were no longer a mere schism or heretical sect. At this point, they had developed a worldview that was at complete odds with the Catholic worldview favored by the bishops and Catholic theologians. Adrian VI, while perhaps sympathetic to their plight, could not afford to offer them any further ground. He found himself forced to moderate and wrote to his legates: “Continue to conduct yourself with the utmost decorum; we cannot in any way support the cause of Melanchthon’s delegation—they must listen to our appeals and alter their own views.” Just as Adrian VI could not afford to give ground to the Protestant delegation and sought allies from the more conservative prelates, it seemed increasingly hopeless that the Protestants would willingly subject themselves to the decrees of a council that had been formed in the way that Lucerne had. “We are here under duress,” Melanchthon wrote in a letter to the Electress Palatine. “We debate petty issues, and nothing is resolved. There is nothing here that I would willingly agree with—they expect us to bow our heads in shame and accept that the gruel they feed us is indeed roast venison. We shall be the laughingstock of Europe if we give any ground here—Luther would cry from beyond the grave if he could…”

    The initial work of the council was totally milquetoast. Council members eventually agreed after Protestant remonstrations that reform and doctrinal issues should be considered together rather than as separate subjects. Adrian VI was not opposed to this issue—he knew that any talk of reform would likely touch upon the practices of the Roman Curia. “Adrian VI still remained adamant to use the Council of Lucerne as a political coup for his position,” one historian wrote. “He saw reform of the church’s practice to sideline his conservative enemies without confronting them directly. Degrees by a Catholic council would carry more weight than his edict alone.” Yet the matters considered were banal: they publicly subscribed to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed and agreed on how discussions of doctrine should be handled. There would be no debate but rather give and take—with theologians given time to present their views on specific articles in Congregations that would be held on certain days. One of the first matters considered before the council was that of the scripture: the Catholic camp was divided sharply over vernacular bibles; some saw them as founts of heresy, others as needed nourishment for a spiritual life. The Spanish delegation raised a heated issue against the idea of the Bible in the vernacular. Still, national issues remained: in England, France, and even Spain, bibles in the vernacular remained forbidden. If the council advocated for them, the episcopacy and the crowns would likely countermand the decree. If it forbade such writings, other areas—Germany, Italy, Poland—would have the opposite adverse reaction. Ultimately, the council met in the middle: they decreed that translations were not abusive but that the Vulgate remained accepted as the most authentic version of the Bible. Other versions were not rejected, as other translations had existed in ancient times, but anonymous translations were prohibited—alongside anonymous theological tracts. The Bible in Vulgate was accepted as the most authentic and only version proper for preaching and teaching. In this area, Protestant Bibles in the vernacular were passed over in silence.

    In other areas, Lucerne did move towards genuine reform within the Catholic Church. It was ordered that proper education be provided within dioceses to educate the clergy and to counter clerical ignorance. To do this, a humanist program was adopted, which called for establishing scripture lectureships in each diocese. The Bible was considered the touchstone of such a program, but to appease theologians, it was also decreed that more rigorous schools should be established, which would be based on a more scholastic program. To ensure that the gospel was adequately heard and preached, Lucerne also mandated for the first time that both bishops and pastors should preach to their flocks every Sunday and on Holy Days. Lucerne sought to codify the position of bishops within the dioceses, to bring bishops back to the position they had once held during the period of Augustine of Hippo. While some were undoubtedly skeptical of such an idea, others welcomed reforming clerical education to provide a higher standard—yet one major issue remained. If Bishops were to preach each Sunday, this directly countermanded the common practice of prelates holding multiple dioceses. This made the issue of residence a distinctly important issue—and a lightning rod among some Catholic prelates. “Adrian VI sought to use the idea of clerical residence to win others to his cause,” one historian wrote. “Many bishops held grievances in this area, as mendicant orders held a monopoly in some dioceses, and flaunted this privilege almost virulently… one bishop complained that the friars preached what they pleased, when they pleased, without oversight.” In this instance, Adrian urged his legates to work with the bishops—he desired to orient the bishops and the episcopate as the prime pastor within the diocese. For the first time, the practice of holding multiple dioceses was condemned.

    600px-7222_Adoraci%C3%B3n_de_los_Reyes_Magos.jpg

    Adoration of the Magi, El Grieco; 1568.

    Matters crawled at a snail’s pace into 1554 and 1555—debates centered around original sin, and justification provoked nearly violent tumults. The Protestant delegations under Philipp Melanchthon remained adamant—unless there was acceptance of the doctrine of justification by faith alone. In this, Catholic theologians dug into ancient councils held previously. Several congregations were held during this period, where Catholic theologians offered their views; in others, Protestant theologians framed their world views and beliefs. In this situation, regarding Original Sin, the Catholic position held as it had previously: they sought to continue to condemn the views held by the Pelagians in the patristic era; other decrees attacked the Anabaptists and their views on infant baptism. “Adam was not made worse by his sin,” one writer wrote. “Adam’s sinning harmed but Adam alone; sin is an attack upon the soul, which removes our natural powers and faith.” Justification proved a pricklier issue. Adrian instructed his legates: “Extort all present to increase their prayers to God through the Holy Spirit—that will show them the truth. Look into this matter; research and read widely into it… this includes such books published by our “enemies.” They must be studied and examined through the same unbiased lens we look at our ancient fathers’ work. We cannot conclude that simply because ‘Luther said it,’ that it is false… heresy always contains some element of truth.” Adrian VI advocated that the council hold a middle ground in such discussions—it should not give way in either direction.

    Rather than a path of moderation, the debates over justification devolved into petty arguments. In one situation, two bishops with differing views became so heated that their discussion evolved into a physical brawl that required one of the legates to intervene to bring it to an end. The Protestant delegation arranged under Philipp Melanchthon remained profoundly sidelined—when Melanchthon spoke in one congregation regarding Lutheran views on justification, he was profoundly booed by the bishops present—Lutheran congregations were used by the Catholic prelates not as an excuse to learn, but rather as a reason to attack the Protestants for their views and heresies. “Heretic! Schismatic!” Words and insults were hissed and hurled throughout Melanchthon’s congregation, and he ultimately retired out of frustration rather than continue. “I have reached the conclusion that our participation in this farce is of no use to our cause,” Melanchthon wrote in a letter to the Electress of the Palatinate. “They shall give us no ground—they expect us to make the sacrifice. I say—no more.” Issues were confounded by the declining health of Emperor Charles V—and rumors that François II of France had ordered a buildup of his own troops along the borders of France and the Holy Roman Empire to execute the perfect strike. These rumors were realized in the spring of 1555—when François II ordered that the French delegation quit Lucerne. Though the French delegation numbered no more than twenty men, it was a shock. “I have done all that I can to maintain them here,” one of the legates wrote to Adrian VI. “They are adamant that they have been recalled home and shall rejoin our deliberations as soon as possible…” Such promises smelt only of lies—many bishops noted that some of the French delegates seemed to be in intense discussion with Philipp Melanchthon’s Protestant delegation. “They whisper, and they play,” one prelate wrote in a coded letter. “They shall betray us—I know it.”

    When Charles V died in the early summer of 1555, the council had yet to proceed regarding justification. Indeed, the Protestant delegation had begun to refuse to attend sessions starting in May—leading to further anguish. Even upon his deathbed, Charles awaited news that things were proceeding favorably. One rumor (later debunked) proclaimed that the emperor died shortly after receiving news that the Protestant delegation ultimately marched out of Lucerne. The Protestants announced their departure from Lucerne several weeks after Charles had passed—and sometime after the French delegation’s departure. While the council attempted to soldier onward, they were torn asunder when, in the fall of 1555, François II proclaimed his rights to Artois and Franche-Comté—alongside disputing his father’s renunciation of Flanders in the 1530s. “François II announced boldly in the autumn of 1555 that the pretended King of the Romans, Maximilian II, had one choice—if he wished to retain Flanders, he should immediately give up control over Artois and Franche-Comté, as promised when François had taken Isabelle of Austria as his wife. Maximilian II, in the fit of his father’s death and the transition of power, immediately refused—hoping to buy time. He was soon met with rumblings among the Protestant princes… armed with French supplies and money, they demanded the recognition of their faith, and the emperor recalled his prelates from Lucerne to attend a national council in Germany. The new sovereign was attacked on all sides… when he refused to bow to French pressures, French troops wasted no time in surging beyond the border into Artois, Flanders, and Franche-Comté… their allies in Lorraine assisted in marauding the lands around Metz… the French king proclaimed himself the defender of German liberties, assembling a league centered around the person of Johann Friedrich, the former Elector of Saxony—who once more urged the Protestant Princes to fight back against imperial encroachments.”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 44. The Fürstenkrieg — The Italian War of 1555-1562; Part 1.
  • Things are progressing smoothly on this next chapter! I was going to write it all together, but I felt like this section met a natural end: so I've decided to publish it and maybe finish it off in the next part. Enjoy!

    Chapter 44. The Fürstenkrieg — The Italian War of 1555-1562; Part 1.
    1551-1556; Germany & France.

    “Should not in this best garden of the world,
    Our fertile France, put up her lovely visage?
    Alas, she hath from France too long been chased,
    And all her husbandry doth lie on heaps,
    Corrupting in its own fertility.”
    — Burgundy in “Agincourt” by Pat Purton
    [1]

    Musical Accompaniment: Je suis Déshéritée

    600px-Pieter_Bruegel_de_Oude_-_De_val_van_Icarus.jpg

    Landscape of the Fall of Icarus, Pieter Bruegel the Elder; c. 1558.

    The Fürstenkrieg exploded in 1555 and was a heavy conflict with several other names. In France, the conflict is commonly lumped into the perennial disputes between the houses of Habsburg and Valois. Because of its Italian component, it is occasionally known as the Italian War of 1555-1559. “The seeds of the Italian War of 1555—the final Italian War between the Habsburg and Valois were lain with the death of King François I of France,” one eighteenth-century historian wrote in their treatise on the conflict. “François I was succeeded by his eldest son, François II. François II’s concerns lay not in Italy but across the border in Burgundy. As his father had succeeded in taming Italy, François saw it as his mission to expand France’s territories along its environs. His life’s obsession was the fiefs of Artois and Franche-Comté, which had been promised to him as a dowry when he wed his wife, the Burgundian princess Isabelle of Austria…” Though François II succeeded as his father when royal finances were burdened, he did all he could to right the ship, knowing that France would need all the resources he could muster when the time came. The early years of François II’s reign were known somewhat for their innovation—he introduced financial reforms to the Maison du Roi. He established the Cour des Monnaies as a sovereign court to prosecute currency-related crimes, such as coin-clipping and counterfeiting, which became punishable by death. At the same time, François championed the establishment of new mints in Nantes (1550), Toulouse (1552) and Marseille (1555).

    Though the Treaty of Compiègne had settled the conflict between the King of France and the Holy Roman Emperor, it could only hold so long as both sovereigns were willing to hold it together. By the mid-1550s, cracks had already begun to appear in the edifice; Charles V was in failing health, while François II had set his gaze upon those Burgundian provinces that had been denied to him for nearly two decades. “Privately, it consumed the king’s focus,” Henri de Secondat, the king’s secretary, wrote in his journals. “He looked upon the conquests of the late king, his father, with ‘dismay’… in his mind, what glory or worth might be wrought from Milan and Naples? They now lay in the hand of other princes—French princes… but others, nevertheless.” Other issues, such as the Council of Lucerne, loomed large. François II had agreed to send a token delegation to attend the council, headed by François of Bourbon—son of the Constable of Bourbon and known as the Cardinal-Duke of Bourbon. The Cardinal-Duke, the founder of the Isèrian Order, took a dim view of reconciliation with the Lutherans and used his authority among the French prelates and other conservatives to frustrate the proceedings. “The Cardinal de Bourbon is a rascal,” one prelate wrote in a letter to an associate. “He need only speak, and his voice fills the entire room with steam.” When the French finally departed from Lucerne in 1555, it was met with a mixture of relief and dismay—relief that work might truly begin—followed by dismay when the Protestants left. This was soon followed by François II’s declaration of war against Maximilian, who declared himself a patron of the Protestant German princes.

    France’s alliance with the German Protestants did not come out of thin air; work towards an alliance began as secretly as 1551—when Anna of Cleves, the Dowager Electress of the Palatinate and regent for her young son Friedrich III, made overtures to the French court. In this, Anna used her brother, the Duke of Cleves, as a proxy, whose wife Victoire was a younger sister of the French king. In the meantime, the Electress used her position to mobilize support among Protestant princes throughout northern and central Germany, opposed the political reforms championed by Charles V at the Diet of Augsburg in 1548, as well as his interim religious plans pending the Lutheran reunification with the Catholic faith. A fresh German alliance was ratified through the Treaty of Gotha in 1551—signatories included the Electoral Palatinate, the Duchy of Cleves-Jülich-Berg, the Duchy of Prussia, Pomerania, and Brandenburg-Ansbach. Philipp-Ludwig, son of Philipp of Hesse, also expressed interest, alongside Sybille of Cleves—wife of Johann Friedrich, the deposed Elector of Saxony. The alliance forged at Gotha proclaimed their intent to defend the Protestant faith and Teutonic Liberty—the freedom of the imperial princes to govern as they saw fit without unnecessary imperial oversight. This new alliance, the League of Gotha, was also colloquially known as the Fürstenbund. “Almost immediately, the members of the Fürstenbund set their sights upon securing the release of both Philip of Hesse and Johann Friedrich of Saxony,” one historian wrote. “The Electress Anna of Cleves played a prominent role in the deliberations of the bund through her familial connections… she became its head in name and action.” 1551 also marked the beginning of the rise of influence of the House of Cleves within France, with the Clèves-Nevers branch that held the Duchy of Nevers being singled out for special royal favor. In 1551, François II not only recognized François, the Duke of Nevers, as a Prince Étranger, but the king also played a vital role in arranging his marriage to Princess Françoise-Fébé of Navarre—heiress to the Kingdom of Navarre.

    francoisnevers.jpg
    francoiseofnavarre.jpg

    François, Duke of Nevers & François Fébé, Princesse de Navarre; AI Generated.

    With the support of the league’s princes, Anna dispatched Franz von Spaen, the Baron of Spaen, to France as their envoy in the summer of 1553. “By the time of von Spaen’s arrival in France,” one French courtier would write. “The king was ill-disposed towards the emperor and the Council of Lucerne. Though no friend to the Protestants within his own domains, he saw the possibility that the German Lutherans might be of more political use to him.” François II eagerly took the baron into his confidence, believing that the new league, with proper support, could aid him in his attack upon Burgundy. François II and von Spaen formally signed the Treaty of Saint-Germain in September 1553. François II promised financial aid—some £11,000 per month—alongside providing provisions for the Protestant armies when the time came. In exchange, the German princes promised not only to support French claims in both Artois and Franche-Comté but to agree that the King of France should assume the vicariate of certain cities along the Franco-Imperial border, namely Cambrai, Toul, Metz, and Verdun. In effect, the princes opened the door for France to annex these territories through legal fiction—a fiction that François II was pleased to sign. Plans would be put into place throughout the remainder of 1553 and 1554. “It is my intention that we should strike when we shall have the most benefit,” François II stated in a meeting before the Conseil Privé. “I shall have what is rightfully mine, and none shall be able to deny it.”

    When Charles V passed away in June 1555, the die was cast. By that autumn, François II demanded that Maximilian turn over Artois or Franche-Comté—or risk the potential loss of Flanders. “Maximilian spat upon his brother-in-law’s offer,” one member of the Burgundian court wrote in their memoirs. “When he sent away the French envoy who brought the insulting offer, he boldly declared before all who would listen: ‘As there is no honor among thieves, I must suppose that there is no honor among brothers, either.’ He refused to be cowed by France’s empty threats and prepared what must be done.” By September, French troops under the command of Anne de Montmorency flooded across the border. “We marched into Flanders under the command of the Baron of Montmorency,” one French officer wrote in his diaries. “With 30,000 men and two hundred cannons—seeking gloire as our fathers did in Italy…” Cambrai fell after a token siege, followed soon after by Arras. By mid-October, Montmorency’s troops had occupied the whole of Artois. They proceeded into Flanders and Hainault, where Lille was under siege alongside Nieuport—while French troops also closed the distance towards Namur, where Philip of Hesse and Johann Friedrich of Saxony had been held since 1547. For his quick victories, François II awarded Montmorency with a dukedom. France’s quick offensive into Artois and Flanders allowed the French to establish control over the territories surrounding the English Pale of Calais—with the years of 1555-1559 being known as the lean years within the pale due to a collapse of trade across the border.

    As Montmorency pressed into Flanders, the Count of Vaudémont led some 25,000 French troops into an offensive along the Rhine River. A detachment of 10,000 men was used to occupy Franche-Comté—engagements around Dôle and Besançon served as a baptism of fire for Nicholas and Antoine of Lorraine—younger brothers of Duke François of Lorraine[2]. The remaining 15,000 troops were used to ravage the territories around Verdun, Toul, and Metz. By November, Vaudémont was joined by 12,000 German Landsknechts under the command of the Count Palatine of Neuberg, Otto Heinrich, where they ravaged the territories around Trier and Mainz before setting up their winter encampment near Worms. The Archbishops of Mainz and Trier were spooked by the French troops in proximity, and a tense winter unfolded throughout 1555, with iconoclastic riots breaking out in the southern Rhineland. “I have received Your Majesty’s advice, and I intended to follow it,” the Archbishop of Trier wrote in a letter to Maximilian II. “But the only route out of the city exposes my retinue to considerable danger. I have decided instead to take up residence at the castle of Helferstein across the river… There, we are safe and can withstand a siege if needed. I have instructed the treasury to bury this season’s revenues—some 10,000 thalers—in the graveyard near the cathedral…”

    lossy-page1-600px-Sack_of_a_Town_%28Sebastiaen_Vrancx%29_-_Gothenburg_Museum_of_Art_-_GKM_1396.tif.jpg

    Sack of a town; Early 17th Century.

    As the French surged along the Rhine, other members of the princely league used their position to move against imperial positions in southern Germany. Heinrich, the Duke of Württemberg, long confined to the enclave at Montbéliard, succeeded in reestablishing his position in his ancestral duchy. The Estates of Württemberg, convoked on Christmas Day at Böblingen, recognized Heinrich as Duke of Württemberg in exchange for his promise to abide by the Treaty of Tübingen that had granted the estates a vital role in the governance of the duchy. Heinrich’s restoration also saw Württemberg’s formal adoption of Calvinism—the first state within the empire to do so, as Heinrich had maintained a close relationship with Jean Calvin in his exile. “I ask for your support in organizing our church code,” Duke Heinrich wrote in a letter to Calvin from 1556. “You are the one who shall guide us,” Calvin responded by sending clergy to Württemberg, who could help organize the church within the duchy along similar lines in Geneva. Laws passed in 1556 abolished the episcopate within the duchy and confiscated monastic properties.

    Maximilian was faced with a problematic situation as 1556 opened as French troops had pressed into his ancestral domains in Burgundy and along the Rhine, combined with rebel princes attacking imperial cities and allied territories throughout southern Germany. He leaned upon the Catholic Imperial Estates for support, with the electors (sans the Palatinate, in revolt against the emperor) agreeing to support the declaration of a Reichskrieg against France and the League of Gotha. This allowed Maximilian to call up a muster of the Reichsarmee, the empire’s circle troops, to augment his imperial forces—though this would take time. Maximilian could not necessarily look abroad for allies in foreign affairs: his uncle in Spain, now Fernando VI, expressed little interest in getting involved in another protracted conflict with France. “King Fernando VI, now secure upon his throne in Spain, saw little interest in getting involved in another war against France,” one historian wrote. “Of what benefit might such a conflict be? Perhaps Fernando still nourished hopes of regaining Naples but given previous failures in that direction… it could be little surprise that he chose to declare neutrality instead.” Likewise, Queen Mary of England felt constrained by France. The rapid French advance into the area surrounding the Pale had spooked the English Queen—combined with her tenuous hold on Boulogne, she thought it prudent to remain aloof from continental affairs. This was readily exploited by François II through the Treaty of Paris in late 1555—through which François arranged the betrothal of his eldest son, the Dauphin, to Queen Mary’s daughter, Isabella. It was agreed that Isabella would bring Boulogne to France as her dowry, a privilege François II was prepared to pay the English queen £150,000 for. The treaty represented a volte-face in France: François, the Dauphin, had been engaged to Anne of Scotland in 1548. That match was broken when Scotland pursued an English match instead. A French match had been revived in 1553 for the eldest Scottish princess following the death of the Prince of Wales, but the birth of a long-awaited son in 1554 rendered the match less beneficial for the French—with François quipping to his advisors: “An English match serves us in ways that a Scottish one cannot—what use is the Scottish princess when she is not heiress to the crown?” Queen Charlotte of Scotland, reportedly infuriated at her brother’s duplicity, never forgave him.

    isabella.jpg
    anne.jpg

    Isabella of England & Anne of Scotland, c. 1555; AI Generated.

    In Italy, the news of the French invasion into the Low Countries and the empire was greeted favorably in some quarters. The French Armée d’Italie, once a potent force in maintaining French domination over the Italian peninsula, had been systematically weakened throughout the 1550s by François II: by 1555, they numbered 11,000 men based in Alessandria, with the most veteran soldiers shifted into the French armies used in the invasion of Germany and the Low Countries. “Morale is pitiful,” one French officer in Italy complained in a letter to the king’s Counseil des Affaires. “The men drink, whore, and gamble… many refuse to attend drills, and the ability to replace recruits has plummeted… the duke has now limited our recruitment within the duchy to the regions around Alessandria, proclaiming that men are needed for the esercito ducale most urgently. When our recruiters do trek outside of Alessandria, they are met with gloomy stares, if not outright hostility—two recruiters were murdered last year, and the duke continues to push the issue off…” Duke Filippo II Emanuele had many reasons to be cagey—with the support of his mother and stepfather, he sought to break away from French influence. In 1554, he had entered secret negotiations with Charles V to arrange an offensive alliance aimed at throwing the French out of Italy forever. Though the emperor was gone, his son and successor saw the potential in such an idea with the French surging across his borers—what was needed was a distraction.

    That distraction would be the League of Italy, ratified at Lodi in January 1556—twenty-one years since Charles V’s defeat at the Battle of Lodi. Signatories included Maximilian II, the Duke of Milan, the Dukes of Ferrara and Florence, and the Marquis of Mantua. Pope Adrian VI, though dismayed at the outbreak of warfare, which served to shutter the Council of Lucerne, lent his support to the idea of the league. “Though I despair of the clarion call of war,” Adrian VI wrote in a letter to Cardinal Morone. “I know it is perhaps our only chance to be free—fully free—from the French.” Though all the princes would benefit from the end of French influence in Italy, the Duke of Milan sought to ensure that his position afterward would be the most important. Aside from the Treaty of Lodi, Filippo II Emanuele secretly signed the Treaty of Cremona with Maximilian II—in it, Maximilian agreed to name the Duke of Milan as Imperial Vicar of Italy and to support Milanese territorial claims in northern Italy. This second point proved an important facet; Filippo Emanuele not only sought to lay claim to Parma and Piacenza but to revive Milanese claims to territories in Lombardy that had been lost over a century before, primarily Bergamo and Brescia, now controlled by the Venetian Republic. “It is a small promise to make,” Maximilian wrote in his private journals. “If it means defeating the French.”

    Before the ink was dry upon the parchment signed at Lodi, Filippo Emanuele had brought together some 18,000 men into the ducal army—with 5,000 of them being Swiss mercenaries. 8,000 of these troops were employed in the Farce of Alessandria—where Hieronimo Castiglione succeeded in overrunning the encampments of the Armée d’Italie and placing the city under siege. Some 4000 French troops were captured in the farce, with the remainder trapped within Alessandria and immobilized from offering any resistance. The remainder of Milan’s army was led personally by Filippo Emanuele in an invasion of the Duchy of Parma. Piacenza fell after only a token siege—opening the road to Parma. “Piacenza chose to open its gates rather than resist… I do not yet know what we shall do,” the Duchess of Plaisance wrote in an impassioned letter to her brother, the Duke of Valentinois. “Ottavio says that to leave would be only to admit his own cowardice. Despite my remonstrances, he is adamant: ‘The sons of France fight. They do not flee.’ He is right, but I cannot bear it… the commander of the French garrison here, the Seigneur of Saint-Fargeau, is useless… he states that without direct orders from the king himself, he could not dare raise arms against the Duke of Milan…” Duke Ottavio of Parma ultimately ordered the French garrison to quit Parma, charging them with escorting his mother to Lucca, which had agreed to shelter the duchess. The Duchess of Plaisance’s cortege was overtaken by Modenese soldiers when she attempted to slip through the Duchy of Modena near Massa.

    600px-Christoph_Schwarz_%281550-97%29_-_The_Rape_of_the_Sabines_-_RCIN_403026_-_Royal_Collection.jpg

    The Rape of the Sabine Women, Christoph Schwarz; c. 1573.

    “A most glorious day,” Beatriz—the Queen Dowager of France and Duchess of Ferrara—announced proudly when the news was brought to her. “The extravagance of Anne’s baggage train captured at Massa bewildered popular imagination—and still provokes thoughts today,” a chapter of Anne & Beatriz: Rogues of Italy explained. “She had left Parma with no less than five carriages: only one carriage held her small retinue, and the remainder was filled with traveling chests and trunks. Commentators of the period used it to attack her for her excesses—the Parmese saw her as the French whore who continued to live lavishly. While some portions of the duchess’s escape are certainly absurd—one chest alone was dedicated to her chemises, another to her famed silk gloves—she had contrived to escape with as much as possible in hopes of aiding her son. Indeed, Modenese troops discovered some £10,000 buried throughout Anne’s chests in Italian coinage, believed to be part of the Parmese treasury. Bills of exchange worth another £6000 were discovered, while the duchess’s jewelry and plate that she had carried with her were worth perhaps another £4000. Anne’s baggage and goods were seized by the Modenese troops, and she was placed under arrest. Beatriz ordered her closely confined at Canossa, near Reggio…” By April 1556, Ottavio of Parma surrendered after a short siege—leaving Parma and Piacenza firmly in Milanese hands.

    The Italian League did not please all within Italy—both the Marquis of Saluzzo and the Marquis of Montferrat remained passionate adherents to the French cause. Likewise, the Venetians worried about Milanese ambitions, while the Sienese believed the Duke of Florence harbored designs upon their republic. “The Italian League is no alliance of liberty,” The Doge of Venice wrote in a concerned letter to François II. “It is merely a farce for those involved to expand their dominions at the expense of others.” François II, infuriated by the perfidy of his half-brother in Italy, could only help but agree. “He is no brother to me, but a traitor… and traitors must die.” For all the troubles in Italy, François II remained focused on his gains in Germany. In the summer of 1556, imperial troops successfully defended their positions at the Battle of Mons. Maximilian II set his sights on pressing back against the French along the Rhine—he personally commanded troops at the Battle of Trarbach, where he scored a decisive victory that prevented the French from overrunning Trier and Mainz and linking up with the Protestant rebels. Despite these successes, Maximilian suffered a horrible defeat in the fall at the Siege of Metz. Despite some 20,000 troops and nearly 150 cannons, the French succeeded in holding the city and their positions in the three bishoprics. The campaign season was not a total loss for the French, however: Montmorency seized Lille and occupied southern swaths of the Bishopric of Liège, which allowed him to threaten Namur: he demanded that the city release Philip of Hesse and Johann Friedrich into his custody, or else the city would be subjected to a barrage of artillery fire—a demand which they readily agreed too. The release of these two princes provided potent fuel to the League of Gotha and its signatories. “We are the ones favored by Christ,” the Electress Dowager Anna wrote to her brother. “We have endured setbacks and great victories this year… but now that the princes are free, we shall attain all we have failed in previously.” In this, Anna’s letter proved precipitous: soon after the release of the captives of Namur, Maximilian II sent envoys to parlay with the Protestant rebels—he signaled not only his desire to make peace with them but an openness to meet demands that had been refused to them during the reign of his father. Where the previous emperor had refused, the new one was now prepared to agree to offer official recognition of their faith and creed and toleration. He had but one request: they must break from France and support Maximilian’s war against them.

    [1] Anno's Shakespeare. Credit goes to @King of Danes who fully fleshed out this character, even creating some plays and lines for him! This line comes from the Historical Henry V published by Shakespeare, but we shall have some unique in-universe plays as well. 😉

    [2] Eldest son of Jean III, the OTL Cardinal de Lorraine.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter 45. An English Rose (With Thorns)
  • Well... my initial plan was for Chapter 45 to be the conclusion of the Fürstenkrieg / Italian War that began last chapter. This chapter started as a thread within that part 2, but I quickly realized that the situation I was setting up could not be covered in a few paragraphs and it was quickly taking the Part 2 Chapter way outside of it's designated focus. I ended up ripping out my initial paragraphs for this chapter (which have now been moved to Chapter 46) and turning this into it's own chapter. I'll be honest, it definitely spun out of control 😅 I ended up writing about 8000 words here, but it was very enjoyable to write and introduces one of Mary's daughters as a character in her own right. Consider it a cleanser before we tie up the war in the next chapter!

    Chapter 45. An English Rose (With Thorns)
    1557-1559; England & France.

    "There can be no greater destiny
    for my own daughter beyond this,
    because it has been ordained by fate.”
    — Queen Mary to Princess Isabella, before her departure to France,


    Musical Accompaniment: Fuyons tous d'amour le jeu


    800px-The_Family_of_Darius_before_Alexander_by_Paolo_Veronese_1570.jpg

    The Family of Darius before Alexander, Paolo Veronese; c. 1565.

    In 1557, the French managed a decent campaign season during their conflict against the Holy Roman Emperor. French troops in the three bishoprics continued to hold their positions—while Montmorency pushed ahead in the Low Countries, taking Mons, which placed the whole of Hainault under French occupation. The Dauphin François also took on his first prominent role on the frontlines, leading French troops at the Siege of Ostend. “The Dauphin is a hero,” one French officer would write to his wife. “The men under him serve most willingly, for the prince treats his soldiers tenderly and paternally as any good father might. He pays attention to their needs and wants—for those who fall ill, he procures the needed medicines and cures out of his own funds; when a soldier is maimed, he visits them personally—no matter how horrifically they are wounded. He promises them that they and their families shall be cared for because of the soldier’s sacrifice… and when a soldier dies, the Dauphin is always in attendance for their burial. He is a fierce soldier and a kind lad—some would say too kind. The Duc de Montmorency has sternly reminded him that Monseigneur le Dauphin cannot save everyone… and that his resources are finite even as a Prince of France. The Dauphin will not hear it; he said only to Montmorency in return: ‘Monsieur, these men are good Frenchmen. They fight for our cause without a single complaint. They are my father’s subjects, and someday they shall be mine. I cannot look away while they suffer—they must be provided for. If the crown will not do it, then I shall.’ It is said that out of his annual revenues, more than a third is earmarked for pensions to be provided for those under his command who are maimed or killed.’ Ostend would prove to be the Dauphin’s baptism of fire, where he suffered a wound to his shoulder.

    With the French continuing to progress against the Habsburgs in the Low Countries, one of François II’s paramount concerns was ensuring that England maintained neutrality in the conflict. “The Queen of England is an enigma,” François II reportedly told one of his councilors. “There is no doubt that she follows in her father’s footsteps and seeks to forge her own course. Despite this, she cannot be trusted: she was our enemy once before and may become our enemy again. For now, we must strive to maintain the peace… and our only way forward is a royal marriage.” François II continued to move plans forward for an English marriage for the Dauphin. Even with France entangled in a dangerous conflict, the king was adamant that the marriage date should be set for April 1558. “No expense should be spared,” François II wrote in a letter from Arras to his wife, Queen Isabelle. “This is a union between a Fils de France with a princess of the blood royal of England… the first marriage in nearly six hundred years since that of Edwige de Wessex, wife of Charles the Simple and mother of Louis d’Outremer. All of Europe should see the glories of our house and court and marvel at what we can accomplish even in such difficult times. In my tour here of Artois, I have decided that the pair shall be wed at the Cathedral of Arras, for this province is ours by right. Having been denied our joys and gaiety for nearly twenty years, our subjects here shall be invited to rejoice in it alongside us for the first time.”

    Negotiations between England and France from 1555 to 1557 to finalize the marriage agreement mainly concerned minor matters. François agreed that the French payment for Boulogne, totaling £150,000, would be paid out in four installments from the date of marriage. Given that France was forfeiting a cash dowry and even paying England for the pleasure of the marriage, Queen Mary proved magnanimous in her negotiations with the Court of France: she agreed not only to pay for Isabella’s trousseau which was estimated at £25,000 but to augment Isabella’s plate with additional jewelry worth some £10,000. “Princess Isabella’s gowns and dresses proved a boon for England,” one fashion historian wrote in their book of royal fashions. “With conflict continuing between France and the Holy Roman Empire, trade was greatly constrained between England and Flanders. Even trade with France was limited, with the French instituting strict controls over the territories surrounding the Pale of Calais to combat smuggling. England’s upper-class fashions had long been influenced by the continent—English milliners produced outstanding items for their noble clients using designs from Flanders, France, and Spain… using lace and cloth from Flanders, and silk from France and Italy… for Princess Isabella of England’s trousseau, Queen Mary put forth a radical idea: decreeing that the whole of her wardrobe, while adhering to French fashions, should be produced wholly in England.” In 1555, Queen Mary offered incentives to select Flemish lacemakers in Bedfordshire and Honiton who were chosen to provide lace for the royal trousseau. A tax incentive was also established, with the Flemish lacemakers to receive tax breaks for the number of English apprentices they took on—with subsidies to be granted for each English apprentice who became a journeyman. Incentives were also offered for cloth production: in 1556, Parliament passed the Cloth Making Act of 1556, which sought to stimulate cloth production in corporate towns and market towns by increasing export duties for raw wool alongside import duties for Flemish cloth. The Cloth Act ultimately failed to make a considerable dent—many English landowners preferred exporting wool to Flanders; despite increased duties, the war had caused a spike in prices, which meant grand profits for those willing to risk it. Despite this, the act led to the establishment of some of the first Loomshops in Spitalfields by enterprising merchants, where weavers worked side by side on handlooms in the upper stories—with the finished products sold on the lower floors.

    500px-16th_century_costumes_of_merchants_from_Brabant_and_Antwerp.jpg

    Costumes of Two Merchant Couples from Brabant and Antwerp; c. 1577.

    Princess Isabella, born in 1542, had her father’s coloring—as well as his eyes. Within the English court, Isabella was known as le petite danois owing to her Oldenburg features. Of Mary and John’s children, Isabella was perhaps the child most like the queen. Isabella possessed a fiery temper, with the queen once lamenting in a letter to Baroness Paget: “Our little danois is a hellion… when she is not causing trouble in the nursery, she is biting her nursemaids… indeed, I know not what I shall do; three have already left, and the remaining poor women insist they can endure no more. I am at my wit’s end. I have offered to increase their wages from £3 per annum to £4, but they insist they would not endure such tantrums and troubles even if I offered to make them ladies.” Isabella was closest in age to the queen’s younger sons: Charles (b. 1545), who became Prince of Wales in 1553, and Edward (b. 1546), the Duke of Somerset. As the youngest princesses, Isabella and Joan had an age gap of seven years, they had separate establishments. Isabella’s initial governess was the Dowager Countess of Essex, but she retired in 1549, citing exhaustion. She was replaced by Catherine Grey née Fitzalan, the Marchioness of Dorset. “The princess is a wild and lively one,” the marchioness wrote in a letter to Queen Mary following their initial meeting. “But what she needs is structure, and that is what she will learn, for it must be structure or the birch.” Queen Mary was pleased that the marchioness was not overawed by her young charge and was prepared to treat her firmly and fairly. “You are most right, madam,” Mary wrote to the Marchioness of Grey in turn. “What she needs is a firm hand and a strong guide… she possesses that Tudor flame within her; she needs someone who will tell her plainly and who will not coddle or indulge her. I believe you are the answer to my prayers and would be pleased if you become her next governess…” The youthful princess at first resented the dour matron appointed to head her establishment. Still, Catherine Grey’s firm hand would allow Isabella’s fiery energy to be directed into more productive outlets, with the marchioness encouraging Isabella’s love for learning. In this, her spirits and energy were channeled towards developing her mind.

    “Princess Isabella perhaps had the most expansive education of the queen’s daughters and was comparable to that of her sons…” one historian would write in their biography of Princess Isabella. “While Isabella had the typical feminine education based in deportment, etiquette, dancing, and French, it was the urging of the Marchioness of Dorset that saw Isabella included in the masculine lessons of her brothers, the Prince of Wales, and the Duke of Somerset. She attended lessons and lectures about English history given by Polydore Vergil, Bishop of Bath and Wells, until he died in 1555—Vergil had educated Queen Mary in her youth. Italian lessons were provided by the Duke of Somerset’s Italian tutor, Celio Secondo Curione, who pronounced: ‘She speaks the language as lovingly as one born along the Tiber.’ Latin and Greek were taught to the princess by Philip d’Oyly, an English Jesuit who would later be appointed her confessor—the first Jesuit to serve an English prince or princess in such a capacity. Isabella was even allowed to attend lessons planned for the Prince of Wales, such as a lecture by Francis Palgrave, Provost of King’s College, covering the English Parliament and its role in royal governance. ‘She is undoubtedly the smartest—and the wisest of her siblings, including her brothers,’ one royal tutor reportedly uttered. Another apocryphal statement allegedly spoken in the 1570s was more pointed: ‘Queen is but the sweetest word in England, owing to how well we have been served by Queen Mary, our greatest sovereign. A pity then, that queen shall be followed by king, rather than queen yet again—there be no fitter successor for Her Majesty than Princess Isabella. Just as her namesake led Spain into its grandest age, we cannot doubt that the reign of Queen Isabella of England would be glorious… a golden Isabelline age which would raise England to ever greater heights among the crowns of Europe.’ Isabella’s overall religious education was provided by Abbot of Reading, Hugh de Sècheville, who sought to imbue his charge with a strong and practical faith: ‘Hold steadfast always to the faith that nourishes not only your mother, but your ancestors of the English Royal House,’ de Sècheville reportedly told his young charge in 1554, when she was twelve. ‘God judges not just your actions, but the good you do in your life. I beg you—always remember your good luck to be born a Princess of England, for it is just that: luck—and with that luck, you should do all you can to alleviate the suffering of your subjects.’ Isabella’s faith was secure and based on good deeds; as a teenager, she began to give to charity, and in 1555, she participated for the first time in the Royal Maundy service alongside her mother and the Prince of Wales, where she washed the feet of thirteen poor penitent women and provided alms and charity from her own privy purse…”

    As Isabella grew from a young girl into a young woman, it could be no surprise that Queen Mary considered her potential marriage of paramount concern. When the Crown Princess of Portugal, Maria of Spain, gave birth to her first child, a son named Afonso Filipe, in 1544, Mary nursed hopes that the young prince might be a future husband for her young daughter, who might become the next Queen of Portugal. “I write with regret, madam,” England’s envoy to Portugal, Sir Charles Brydges, wrote in a letter to the queen in mid-1544. “That the young prince Alfonso perished this evening, shortly after Matins—carried off by the Bloody Flux. To be true, the prince was no bonny lad… in his short life of six months, he suffered from agues, fevers, and frequent convulsions. Despite this, he was silent… never once did the prince cry, and some suspect that, along with being lame, he was perhaps mute as well. The prince’s head was heavier than the whole of his small frame and swelled with fluid—the doctors pierced it regularly in hopes of reducing the swelling and relieving the young prince. The crown prince and princess are inconsolable in their loss, alongside the king and queen. King João despairs most profusely, for he had procured swaddling shortly before the prince’s death, which had allegedly been worn by Princess Joanna of Portugal, that devout princess who had been sought as a bride by the usurper Richard of York, and whom she was wise enough to refuse. Queen Eleanor seeks the light in this dark moment… she prays daily with the crown princess, and at her prie-dieu sits a philatory which contains a bone of St. Rita of Cascia. Both pray several times a day, with Queen Eleanor beseeching that the crown princess quickens yet again and proves more fruitful in her journey to motherhood. It is unseemly, but the commons in Lisbon daily whisper of the curse of the royal family… that of the king’s six children, only three survived—and one son. They fear that the crown prince may suffer as his parents did…” Such a rumor proved prescient: the Crown Princess of Portugal suffered numerous miscarriages. Still, she succeeded in giving birth six more times—to four princes and two princesses—each one weaker and sicklier than the one that proceeded it, with no child living longer than six months.

    800px-The_Triumph_of_Death_by_Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder.jpg

    The Triumph of Death, Pieter Brueghel the Elder; c. 1562.

    In the tragedies of the House of Aviz, Mary was forced to look elsewhere. Christian II of Denmark, hoping to mend fences with England following Mary’s renunciation, suggested that Isabella should wed his grandson, Albrecht (b. 1543)—eldest son of Ludwig X of Bavaria and Princess Christina—a match that many believed that Christian II championed in hopes of naming Albrecht his heir by tying him to an English granddaughter which carried the blood of his son, John—and a match that some within the English Privy Council believed prudent. “I have made myself clear,” Mary wrote angrily in a letter to Bishop Gardinier, who had become Lord Chancellor in 1550. “I wish nothing to do with that murderer, and nothing shall ever sway my mind. That goes for all my children… my sons just as well as my daughters! What right would I have to send one of my finest English roses into the den of iniquity and murder, which is Denmark? No—no, never. Erase it from your mind, good Bishop, and good Chancellor… meddle not in such matters and tell your dog Paget to do the same. I know that neither of you acts out of maliciousness but out of concern for my own welfare—and for the good of our late king, too… but remember what the dear king bade you all do in his will: to obey me in all things, as you often and always have before. As I have clarified my feelings on the Danish king, we should have no further reason to discuss it.” Following the death of Princess Catherine in 1553, some suggested that the Treaty of Asti with the Duke of Savoy might go forward, with Princess Isabella to replace her deceased sister. Filippo III, Catherine’s former betrothed and Duke of Savoy since 1550, expressed little interest in the idea, quipping to his councilors: “I desire a wife that is ready and ripe for the marriage bed… I have no need for a little wife who will be more interested in her dolls than in my prick.” In some ways, the outbreak of the Fürstenkrieg proved ideal for an Anglo-French marriage: Mary, concerned with French aggression within the Low Countries, was now more than willing to part with Boulogne. The French were more than eager to appease the English to ensure their neutrality and were prepared to pay the honor.

    As 1558 dawned, Isabella was on the cusp of womanhood—fifteen, nearly sixteen. “The princess, though well educated, had never lost that initial spark of life,” one English courtier wrote in their journal. “She possessed the same fiery temper of her mother and was not someone who suffered fools willingly—those who displeased her were liable to be struck—either by her hand or her fan.” As Isabella and Mary shared so many similarities, it was little surprise that they were the ones who clashed the most. They fought and argued incessantly; their rows were reminiscent of Queen Catherine’s struggles when Queen Mary was the same age. “She is impossible…” Mary ranted in a letter to Catherine Blount. “Every day, without fail, she takes issue with something—be it her privy purse, complaints about her household… if she desires to complain, she shall. It ends the same way… in difficult rows that end with us both in tears. I see myself in every argument and tantrum and cannot help but shudder as I recall the troubles I bestowed upon my blessed mother. How she endured and did not retire to Spain is beyond me.” Mary’s other children were both overawed by her: the Prince of Wales would not dare say a cross word in her presence, while Princess Mary, now married into Spain, continued to write her mother weekly and often asked for her advice. Isabella, in comparison, could not be subjugated: “She is the queen, and she is my mother,” Isabella reportedly retorted. “There are no shadows when your mother is the source of all light.” Despite the arguments and troubles, each passing day brought Isabella closer to her destiny in France: a destiny that did not scare her but was instead one that she craved eagerly.

    The English court entered high gear in February and March as celebrations were underway for Isabella’s upcoming marriage. Towards the end of February, Isabella took on a lead role in one of the first court masques hosted since the death of King John. “The masque was an allegory of the princess’s upcoming nuptials—Princess Isabella, dressed in a tunic of cloth of silver, played the role of Brittania, a personification of England,” one courtier wrote in their diary. “Beseeched by various dancers that represented discord and chaos as they danced around her, the young princess was quickly saved by a figure known as Gallus, representing France, who asked that Brittania join him. The masque closed out with Brittania and Gallus dancing a galliard… the princess exceeded beyond measure.” Mary spared no expense in the lead-up to Isabella’s marriage, with feasts, dances, and other celebrations held several days a week. Though Mary would often open such festivities and events, she retired early in the evening—leaving the youth of her court to enjoy themselves in such revelries late into the night. With the marriage contract finalized at the end of February 1558, Isabella was married by proxy in March. “It was decided in early March that the French envoy, the Prince of La Roche-sur-Yon, would serve as the Dauphin’s proxy as a Prince of the Blood,” one courtier wrote in a letter to her family. “The queen hosted the ceremony within the Queen’s Closet at St. Sylvester’s Palace—the first royal marriage celebrated within the new palace. In the absence of the late king, the queen alone gave away the princess. Afterward, Princess Isabella, now the Dauphine of France, was placed into bed to symbolize her marriage, albeit alone. When it was suggested that the Prince of La Roche-sur-Yon should place his bare leg into the bed for the princess to touch, Queen Mary objected most strenuously on the grounds of propriety. The French gave way in this, and that certain ritual was omitted.”

    Isabella, now the Dauphine of France, would also be known as Isabelle d’Angleterre. Plans moved swiftly ahead for Isabella to prepare for her departure to France. Though the princess was excited about the future, it could be of little surprise that part of her was worried. “I am leaving the only land I know,” Isabella would write in her diary. “For a place that I know only of my dreams. Shall I ever see my mother again? My brothers, or even my sisters?” Plans were set for Isabella to embark for France from Portsmouth, with plans to disembark at Rouen, which was considered a safer option than Calais. Isabella’s trousseau was fully outfitted, along with her jewels and plate. Among the jewels given to the young princess by her mother were several pieces that had been owned by her grandmother Catherine of Aragon: this included a ruby ring which she had brought from Spain, a gold pomegranate brooch, along with several loose diamonds that Queen Mary had mounted into the form of a rose with a large pearl attached—to be worn about Isabella’s breast. The English court accompanied Isabella from London to Portsmouth on her last journey in England. As Isabella watched as her items were carted onto the Grande Française, the flagship of the Flotte de Ponant that would carry her overseas, it was said that she finally lost her composure as she began to weep profusely. Queen Mary also wept, and they began to say their goodbyes. Mary embraced her daughter, who had been so difficult but whom she adored as well. “Do all you can to please the French,” Mary reportedly told Isabella. “Make them love and adore you—so they may be sure I have sent them an angel.” Aside from the Dauphine herself, her retinue also included four English maids-of-honor: First was Etheldreda Paget (b. 1544), daughter of William Paget, Baron Paget, and his wife Jane Seymour—who would become more well-known by her French name, Etheldrède. Second was Mary Fitzalan (b. 1542), daughter of the Earl of Arundel and the late Countess of Arundel, Anne Fitzalan—who had been one of Queen Mary’s closest friends. Isabella’s third companion was Catherine Grey (b. 1543), daughter of the Marquess and Marchioness of Dorset. Her last companion was to be Elizabeth Courtenay (b. 1546), daughter of Henry Courtenay, Earl of Devon, and son of the Marquess of Exeter. Isabella’s maids were to be supervised by Susan Strelley, Lady Fiennes as Mother of the Maids.

    800px-Portuguese_Carracks_off_a_Rocky_Coast.jpg

    Portuguese Carracks Off a Rocky Coast, Anonymous; c. 1540.

    Isabella’s travail from Portsmouth and Rouen was relatively calm. The Grande Française was accompanied by six ships—three warships had been provided by France, while Queen Mary provided three more to further augment her daughter’s flotilla. “Though we had favorable winds, most of the Dauphine’s young maids—and even Lady Fiennes—became terribly seasick,” the French envoy wrote in a letter home. “Only the Dauphine was undaunted; when her maids could not entertain her due to their sickness, she took to taking air about the deck… watching the waves and conversing with the sailors as if she had always been at sea.” After three days at sea, the Grande Française arrived in Rouen with no issue. The Dauphine arrived safely in France no worse for wear—though perhaps her maids were leaner than they had been in Portsmouth. The Dauphine was received gallantly at Rouen by Charles-Rémi, the Duke of Vendôme, who welcomed her effusively. At Rouen Isabella was introduced to members of her household for the first time—Charlotte d’Estouville, Countess of Ligny who was to be Isabella’s Première Dame d’Honneur, while Jeanne de l’Aubespine, Baroness of Châteauneuf was to serve as Isabella’s Dame d’Atours. From the beginning, there was friction within Isabella’s household as her French ladies believed she too highly favored her English servants.

    Isabella met the French court near Amiens, where she was formally introduced to King François II and Queen Isabelle—alongside the Dauphin François and the other French royal children. “A beautiful creature,” Queen Isabelle reportedly told her ladies. Isabella wasted little time flattering her new in-laws, and it was said that she offered up her obeisance with the lowest of curtsies. “I desire only to please you, papa and maman,” Isabella’s florid speech allegedly began. “I am still young, but I wish only to be a loyal wife to the Dauphin and a loyal daughter. As I am now in France, I shall look upon you as my parents and counselors and wish only for your guidance. Take pity upon me, for while I am not an orphan, I have been deprived of the guidance of my father in my short life. I hope that your majesty shall see me as a loyal charge.” François II and Isabelle were reportedly most pleased with their young daughter-in-law, while the Dauphin pronounced her as very pretty and lively. Isabella’s own proclamations in private, however, were less glowing: “I could not ever imagine that a King of France could be a dullard, but this one is.” Isabella wrote in her private diary. “The queen is kind but weak… she does not so much as sneeze without the king’s permission. The Dauphin, François… is handsome but a soldier above all. I have yet to see him smile or laugh even once.

    Yet Isabella’s own pronouncements were just that: her own. Regardless of what she thought of the Dauphin, she knew that they would be wed. The formal marriage ceremony was celebrated in Arras within Artois, and the ceremony was performed by the king’s almoner, the Bishop of Châlons. “François II wasted no expense upon the marriage of the Dauphin in Artois,” one historian wrote. “£40,000 alone was spent to refurbish the cathedral and episcopal palace. Expenses for the royal wardrobe totaled some £30,000, and François II also spent £10,000 to procure new jewels for the Dauphine. Fountains of wine were set up throughout the city, along with feasting tables for Arras’ poorest citizens, which cost the royal coffers some £12,000. Arras consumed thirty tuns of wine and veritable mountains of bread, game, meat, fish, cheese, and pastries. The notables of Arras were treated to a more decadent feast following the wedding at the episcopal palace—a veritable bounty of some one hundred different courses of food that took the Bouche du Roi several days to complete and cost royal coffers another £20,000. Nothing in Arras was left unturned; François II ordered the streets sweetened, and a gilded crimson cloth was laid along the path that the wedding procession would follow… as soon as the procession stepped over the cloth, there was a frenzy as the citizens scrambled to tear at the cloth, hoping to snag even a single scrap. A display of Fireworks was shown in the evening following the wedding that cost another £5000; Italian pyrotechnicians illuminated the episcopal palace, with blasts shot into the sky that displayed the Dolphin of Dauphiné alongside the English lion. Fireballs were shot up into the sky alongside blazing rockets, followed by further displays of legendary beasts—including a large red dragon that moved across the skyline of Arras and breathed actual flames from its mouth, shot in the direction of Flanders and Hainault. Even charity was considered as an expense; François I dispensed some £6000 from the royal coffers so that Queen Isabelle, the Dauphine, and the royal princesses could dispense alms to the needy and destitute women on the morning following the ceremony.” In all, the wedding at Arras represented a coup of French propaganda in the province of Artois. It was not just an attempt for the French crown to display their control over the occupied province but to show the widespread support they enjoyed from their subjects, even if such support was brought through bribes of food and alms.

    800px-Braun_Arras_HAAB.jpg

    Civitates Orbis Terrarum, Map of Arras; Late 16th c.

    Isabella and the Dauphin François were now wed—though perhaps not happily. François was duty-bound and ascetic, despising the fripperies and luxuries of the court. Though nineteen, he was not hot-blooded like most young men his age. “Monseigneur is not someone who easily rises to anger,” one of the Dauphin’s servants wrote. “Even when upset, he easily keeps calm and prefers to seek a solution. I have never seen him utter a cross word towards another; his maître d’hôtel could serve him a blackened and burnt meal, and he would eat it placidly and without complaint, pronouncing it as the best thing he’d ever eaten.” It surprised very few that François was utterly mismatched with his lively English bride: all that she enjoyed, he despised; all that he held dear, she mocked. In her first letter to Queen Mary, Isabella said, “I came to France to wed the Dauphin… instead, I have been wed to a monk.” From the very beginning, the marriage encountered great difficulties. Queen Mary counseled her daughter to be patient: “Love flourishes with time. When I wed your father, I was a young woman just a little past twenty, while your father was but a boy of sixteen. I can speak frankly now that at the beginning of our marriage I did not love him but rather despised him… I thought him a mere boy; all that he stood for and enjoyed, I loathed… things improved as we grew up; I quickened quickly with your eldest sister, and your father marched off to war. When he returned, a triumphant hero, he returned a man; as a man, he was more handsome than ever. Our love grew easier after that. That is not to say that we did not quarrel, for we most certainly did… but he understood me in ways that no one ever had and ever will again. In time, you shall find that with your husband.” Despite Mary’s advice, it did not prove helpful to Isabella—the Dauphin was already a man who had been bloodied in war. She saw little hope of affection flourishing within their marriage’s diseased garden.

    Rather than sulk over disappointment, Isabella did what she could to keep herself occupied. With her charming personality, she could easily win over both the king and queen: François II adored her, while Queen Isabelle believed that her English spark and gaiety were a tonic the court needed. As second lady of the court behind the queen, Isabella’s days were often filled with official presentations and court entertainments, with François II noting sagely: “She outworks us all.” On the days that Queen Isabelle was laid low by the migraines or stomach pains that had plagued her since her youth (such days were common and plentiful), Isabella took the queen’s place for ceremonial occasions. When the queen was ill in June 1558, Isabella attended an installation of knights for the Ordre de Saint-Michel alongside the king. Côme de Sarlabous, one of the men knighted that day, wrote in a letter to his father: “At the appointed time, we watched as the doors into the chamber swung open. We expected to see the king and queen, but we saw instead His Majesty, hand in hand with the Dauphine… a most beautiful princess, who stole the show. Her hair was curled and coiffed, decorated with pearls—including a band of pearls which held her hair in place. She was dressed in a gown of red silk with puffed sleeves and a wide extended collar, with a girdle of silver decorated with precious stones. Her jewels were few but glittering: pearl drop earrings. She wore several rings upon her fingers—her betrothal ring, a ring of ruby, and another of sapphire. She wore no necklace but instead had a broach shaped like a flower made of gold, its petals rubies; within its center was the famed Mirror of Naples… it is one of the most prized of France’s crown jewels: a table cut diamond, wide as a finger, attached to a pearl the size of a pigeon’s egg, which dangled beneath the brooch.”

    Isabella provided a much-needed breath of fresh air to the French court, which, while opulent, had lost some of the luster of the previous reign. She made many friends with little issue, primarily younger noblemen and noblewomen close to her age. Isabella’s close friendships became known as her cercle. They included Flamine Pic de Mirandole, Nicole Viète, Antoine de Balsac, Jean de Crissé, and Charles, the Duke of Angoulême—younger brother of the Dauphin. The Duke of Angoulême was everything his brother was not: he was outgoing, boisterous, and charming—and shared many common interests with the Dauphine that the Dauphin did not. Charles became fast friends with his sister-in-law; he was often available to lend a listening ear and was able to provide necessary advice to Isabella regarding her marriage to his brother. In that same vein, Charles understood Isabella better than his brother and tried to help his brother better appreciate his wife.

    800px-Tiziano_-_Amor_Sacro_y_Amor_Profano_%28Galer%C3%ADa_Borghese%2C_Roma%2C_1514%29.jpg

    Sacred and Profane Love, Titian; 1514.

    Despite the Dauphin and Dauphine’s mismatched tempers, the Dauphin rose to the occasion within the marriage bed. Isabella’s courses ceased during the summer. In August 1558, she fainted during a court celebration while dancing the volta with her brother-in-law. It was soon discovered that Isabella was pregnant. François II and Queen Isabelle were overjoyed. Isabella, on the other hand, was far from pleased. Married for only a few months and still several months from her sixteenth birthday, Isabella glowered at what she believed to be terrible luck. “She is utterly miserable,” Lady Fiennes wrote in a letter to Queen Mary. “The Dauphine asks only to be left alone, and when she is, she weeps and weeps… the princess is still young—it is most assuredly nerves and simply fear of what she does not yet fully understand. In time, she shall understand, and I am sure the tears will cease.” In this, Fiennes was utterly off the mark. Isabella did not fear this change; she despised it because of its restrictions—not to mention how her life would change once the child was born. “I have only begun to enjoy myself,” Isabella lamented in her private journals. “Balls, masques, riding, hunting, and even presentations… all that I love and enjoy shall now ground to a halt, and all shall remind me most sternly that I must have a care for myself because of the babe. Why must I take care? I shall no longer be allowed to frolic, and when the child is born… what then? I shall no longer be free because I shall be that most dreaded word … mother. I know my life has never been my own, but after this… it shall never be.”

    As Isabella acclimated to her new situation, she did what she could to make the best of a terrible situation. Despite her pregnancy, relations between her and François did not improve—indeed, feeling that he had done his duty for a time, he became even more distant from his wife and was absorbed wholly in his affairs. Isabella was soon only seeing her husband on the most formal of occasions. “The Dauphin thinks only of the war and soldiering,” Philippe de Contay, a valet de chambre within the Dauphin’s household, wrote in a letter to his fiancée. “He needs little sleep; he rises at five and spends his morning attending meetings of the Conseil des Affaires, where he continues to press for a bold and aggressive policy in the Low Countries. In the afternoons, the Dauphin conducts reviews of troops that are garrisoned nearby. By the evening, he drowns himself in reports of sundry issues, from provisions to troop morale. All are meticulously reviewed, and the Dauphin often does not retire until after midnight. He is Alexandre le Grand reborn, for this war is his complete and total focus. He has time for nothing else… not even the Dauphine. They live separate lives, each concerned with their own.” As the war between France and the Holy Roman Empire dragged into another year, the Dauphin begged his father daily to allow him to take to the field again. With his shoulder wound healed and the Dauphine pregnant, François II finally consented—and agreed that the Dauphin could rejoin Montmorency’s army in the spring of 1559. In April 1559, scarcely a year since his marriage, François was seen off from the Château of Chambord as he marched off to war yet again. The Dauphin bid farewell to his father, who gave him his blessing, while his mother could not help but embrace him tightly. François and Isabella’s farewell was more perfunctory than heartfelt: François planted a chaste kiss upon her cheek and stated that he hoped for a great victory that would allow him to return in time for the birth of their child. In turn, Isabella expressed a bland farewell: “Monseigneur—I shall pray daily for your victory and our deliverance. Know that when you return, you shall have a son.

    François II and Queen Isabelle carefully observed Isabella as her pregnancy progressed through 1558. Isabella complained bitterly to her English ladies that she was not a doll and resented how the king and queen coddled her. Though Isabella could still attend court events, she hated being unable to participate in balls or masques. In early 1559, Isabella vowed to attend no further court events until she had given birth. To the dismay of her French servants, Isabella retreated into the security of her chambers and the bonds she shared with her English ladies. “This situation is most intolerable, madame,” The Countess of Ligny wrote in a letter to Queen Isabelle. “I beg once again that you speak with the Dauphine… she shows us no care and reserves her affection and trust for her English ladies. We are looked upon no better than carrion; when there is trouble or problems, the English ladies do not have to endure the Dauphine’s venomous tongue nor her blows… it is the good Frenchwomen within her household who do. The Dauphine is under the spell of that wicked Madame Fiennes, who sees herself as head of the Dauphine’s household—she does as she pleases and contradicts not only my commands but those of the Dame d’Atours. I am a Frenchwoman of good birth and breeding: I shall not be dominated by an Englishwoman such as Madame Fiennes; she is not my superior but my inferior… a gentlewoman of base birth and the widow of a knight. I have always outranked her and always shall… it would not matter if the sun ceased rising and the moon hung endlessly in the sky forever more. Even then, I would still outrank her! This cannot continue, madame—if matters cannot be remedied, I shall have to resign from my post.”

    Though the queen remonstrated weakly with Isabella to have better care within her household, Isabella paid no mind—and was utterly incensed when she found out that the Countess of Ligny had complained to the queen directly over her own head. “Remember well that what is said about me always returns to me, Madame Ligny. Most especially when it concerns my own person.” Isabella fumed as she dressed down the Countess of Ligny before her whole household. “Since you have chosen to attack the reputation of one of my servants, you would do well to remember that you are inferior to me. Madame Fiennes may be only a gentlewoman, but it is obvious to me that good birth is no substitute for good manners. On that account, Madame Fiennes shall always outrank you… I am the Dauphine of France and the sun within this household. So long as I have a single breath left, I shall never set. I am the daughter of the greatest queen in Christendom, and my word shall be law within my own household. I seek to be obeyed, not loved. Since you have taken such issue with how my household is run, there is only one solution which shall please us both—and that is your dismissal. You may take your leave, madame—and take Madame de Châteauneuf with you! I care not where you go! Return to the hells for all I care! But do not ever darken my door again. You may save your weeping and wailing; I am an Englishwoman, and we are made of sterner stuff. There is no world where I would be swayed by the hysterics of a Frenchwoman!” Isabella’s dismissal of her Première Dame d’Honneur and her Dame d’Atours was quick and brutal. The drama soon spread beyond Isabella’s household into the court when both women complained directly to François II. Both women begged the king to intervene. They pleaded with the king to restore them to their positions and banish the source of chaos and trouble within the Dauphine’s household: her English servants. François II was utterly besotted with his daughter-in-law and truly believed she could do no wrong. He refused to intervene and asked the ladies to leave the issue alone. “All shall be well, mesdames. I assure you that you shall continue to receive your wages and the privileges of your offices. Let us revisit the matter after the Dauphine’s confinement… Undoubtedly, the Dauphine’s enceinte has distressed her greatly… she is not herself. You shall see; once the babe is born, you shall be welcomed back into her household with open arms.”

    The dramatics within Isabella’s household calmed slightly following her dismissal of the haughty Frenchwomen who had occupied high offices. Isabella dedicated her energies to creating an entertaining atmosphere within her own chambers. Unable to dance or hunt, Isabella chose instead to turn her chambers into a glittering space. She hosted small dinners and other intimate events for members of her cercle. Soirées held by Isabella included poetry readings and discussion circles—where Isabella and her friends discussed various topics, from philosophy to literature. Isabella’s entertainment was not purely intellectual; she also hosted concerts and gambling parties where significant sums of money were won and lost. Isabella popularized Post and Pair at her tables and introduced the English card game Pope July to France. Charles regularly attended Isabella’s entertainments, and the pair were often inseparable as their friendship became even more intense.

    At dinners, Isabella gave Charles the place of honor as her brother-in-law that might have been occupied instead by her husband. Charles was almost always attached to Isabella’s side regardless of the event or entertainment. Their companionship was evident to any who saw it, and Isabella’s English ladies could not help but gossip about such matters. “Angoulême is everything which the Dauphin is not,” Etheldrède Paget wrote in a gossipy letter to her sister. “While the Dauphin is serious and taciturn, his brother is a charming and witty creature, eager to jape and play, which the Dauphine enjoys most profusely. If only you could see them together… he is the only person who can make her laugh and smile.” Isabella’s feelings for her brother-in-law, however, were more guarded. She wrote nothing of the duke in her journals in this period, save perhaps a single entry: “With each passing day, I am one step closer to becoming a mother… fear that I once scoffed at now fills every piece of me. I think only of death; it stalks me throughout these dreadful halls. Death! How can I not ponder my mortality when I, a mere woman of sixteen, have completed a will and testament to disperse my sundry belongings should I perish within my childbed. I am in the bright of my life, but I see only the dark and melancholia, for I am alone. It does not matter if my husband is near or far, for he has no care for me. Only one person cares for me; he is my tonic and light.”

    600px-Fontainebleau_from_the_Valois_Tapestries_%28detail3%29.jpg

    The Palace of Fontainebleau, Valois Tapestries; c. 1580.


    In May 1559, the court moved from Chambord to Fontainebleau—which had undergone an expansion headed by François II and Isabelle in the past decade. Isabella took up residence within whole new chambers designed by Philibert de l’Orme. One of its walls was painted with a massive mural of the Garden of Eden, painted by Francesco Primaticcio. Compared to England, where Queen Mary had entered confinement during her numerous pregnancies, Isabella was not subject to such strictures and entertained heavily throughout May at Fontainebleau. “It is one custom where I shall admit that the French are superior,” Isabella wrote in a letter to Queen Mary. “Why must we be shut away in dreary chambers for weeks because of a condition that is most natural to women?” Isabella finally entered labor on the first day of June, early in the morning, as she was preparing to dress for the day. Rushed back into her chambers, the king and queen were urgently alerted, and the midwives and servants who would serve Isabella through her travail were summoned for duty. Some midwives expressed concern over Isabella’s slender frame; they believed they would be settling in for a long labor that might last several days. Instead, things proceeded quite quickly: by noon, Isabella had given birth to a healthy baby girl who would be named Marie Révérie—in honor of her grandmother, the Queen of England, and Saint Reverianus, whose feast day was the first day of June. The king and queen were well pleased—though François II was disappointed that the Dauphine had not given France a son. “It does not matter,” François II reportedly told Queen Isabelle. “They are still young and clearly well-paired. She shall give France a son in due time.” François II’s words would prove prophetic. Several days following the birth of Marie Révérie, a swarm of messengers cloaked in black arrived at Fontainebleau. They brought urgent news to the king from the Low Countries—letters stamped and sealed by the Duke of Montmorency. The letters announced the death of the Dauphin François, who had died at Ypres several days before from spotted fever. With François’s death, Charles succeeded his elder brother as Dauphin of France.

    François II openly wept when the news was delivered to him—for the loss of his son and the loss of his well-laid plans. He reportedly told his councilors: “Monseigneur has left us with his widow and a princess, but alas—not a prince who might succeed his father as Dauphin. Everything now hangs in the balance… including Boulogne.” François II could not help being concerned. Isabella, though now a widow and mother, was only sixteen. She would certainly not be the first princess in history to be sacrificed at the altar of state in yet another marriage if that was what was decided for her, which it most assuredly would be. François II’s greatest fear was that Queen Mary might seek the return of her daughter to England, which she would have every right to do. Should the English queen decide to do so, François II had no doubt that she might also seek to renege on the Treaty of Paris in 1555 and demand the return to Boulogne. Even worse, England might decide to once more fight alongside the Habsburgs—a headache that the King of France did not even wish to consider. He wanted at all costs to maintain friendly relations with the English court and saw Isabella as his pawn. “We must use whatever time we have to our advantage,” François II wrote to his council. “I intend to send Ægidius de l’Étoile, the Abbé de Bœuil as our new ambassador to England. Officially, he will deliver this most tragic news to the English court. Unofficially, he is to ascertain the Queen of England’s thoughts regarding the Dauphine and her future. When the time is right, I have authorized the abbé to broach a most delicate topic… marriage between the dowager Dauphine and our son, the Dauphin Charles.
     
    Addendum: Dynastic Trees (Updated to 1559)
  • Alright, I figured it was better to have a new post for family trees rather than updated the old ones. These are updated to 1559, at least in some areas but they are also subject to change. Some marriages have been plotted out, others have not. Some lives have been plotted out and some have not. I really don't like to post these because often I get other ideas and change my mind. You will notice that some characters also have death dates plotted out as I've been trying my best to 'finalize' some trees so I have a better idea of where things are headed going forward. Some are more done than others. As for the death date as our heroine Mary, it is listed within this tree too. I've sort of went back and forth regarding Anno and it's ending so to speak, and given that it has long centered around Mary and her life and the times she lives in, I will be using her death date as the ending for Anno. It seems a good finishing point, IMO, to span the course of her life and the world she lives in. I may change my mind (of course) 😅 but I've also been settled on it for awhile and I've had Mary's death date cemented since probably some of the first few chapters and it's never changed. I also feel like the further we get away from the POD, the more difficult it becomes to envision how things may shake out going forward.

    Anno Obumbratio — Dynastic Trees
    Dynastic Trees from the 16th Century

    Abbreviations Guide:
    M. =
    Married; Multiple marriages equal m1, m2, m3 depending on number of marriages
    MM. = Morganatic Marriage
    B. = Betrothed
    Ann. = Annulled
    Div. = Divorced
    [Ilg.] = Illegitimate issue, with mother listed

    THE MAJOR ROYAL HOUSES OF EUROPE —

    House of Tudor (1483 – 1582) / House of Oldenburg (1582–): England

    • Henry VII, King of England (1457–1509) m. Elizabeth of York(1466–1503); Had Issue.
      • Arthur, Prince of Wales (1486–1502); m. Catherine of Aragon (1485–1540); No Issue.
      • Margaret (1489–1546); m. James IV, King of Scots (1473–1513)
      • Henry VIII, King of England (1491–1513) m. Catherine of Aragon(1485–1540); Had Issue.
        • Mary, Queen of England (1513–1582) m. John (II) of Denmark, King of England (Jure Uxoris) & Prince of Norway (1518–1548); Had Issue.
          • Mary (1535–1564) m. Fernando VII Alonso, King of Spain (1528–); Had Issue.
          • Catherine (1538–1553); Died Unmarried.
          • Henry, Prince of Wales (1539–1553); Died Unmarried.
          • Isabella, (1542–1592) m. François of France, Dauphin of France (1539–1559); Had Issue.
          • Charles, Prince of Wales (1545 –)
          • Edward, Duke of Somerset (1546 –)
          • Joan (1549–1620)
      • Mary, (1496–1529); m. Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor (1500–1555); Had Issue.
    House of Stewart: Scotland
    • James IV, King of Scots (1473–1513) m. Margaret of England(1489–1541); Had Issue.
      • James V, King of Scots (1513–1515); Died Young.
      • Alexander IV, King of Scots (1514 –1572) m. Charlotte of France(1516 –1575)
        • Anne (1541 –)
        • Alexander (1543–1545); Died Young.
        • Margaret (1547–1548); Died Young.
        • James (1550); Died Young.
        • Charlotte (1552 –)
        • Robert (1554 –)
    • John, Duke of Albany (1482–1536) m. Anne de la Tour d’Auvergne, Countess of Boulogne(1496–1524); Had Issue.
      • Catherine, Countess of Boulogne (1522–1593) m. Louis de la Trémoille, Duke of Thouars & Prince of Terente (1521–1577); Had Issue.
    House of Habsburg: Holy Roman Empire & Spain
    • Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor (1459–1519) m1. Mary of Burgundy, Duchess of Burgundy (1457–1482); Had Issue. m2. Anne of Brittany, Duchess of Brittany (1477–1514) ann. 1492; m3. Bianca Maria Sforza(1472–1510); No Issue.
      • Philip I, King of Castile & Duke of Burgundy (1478–1506) m. Joanna of Castile, Queen of Castile & Aragon (1479 –); Had Issue.
        • Eleanor (1498–1558) m1. Louis XII, King of France (1462–1515); No Issue. m2. João III, King of Portugal (1502 –); Had Issue.
        • Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor (1500–1556) m. Mary of England (1496–1529); Had Issue. m2. Renée of France(1510 –); Had Issue.
          • M1. Philip (1517–1521); Died Young.
          • M1. Isabella (1521–) m. François of France, Dauphin of France (1519–); Had Issue.
          • M1. Marie (1522–1556) m1. Sigismund II of Poland, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (1515–1554); No Issue. m2. Alexander II of Poland, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (1516 –); Had Issue.
          • M1. Elisabeth (1524); Stillborn.
          • M1. Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor (1527 –) m. Elisabeth of Bohemia, Queen of Bohemia (1525–); Had Issue.
            • Marie (1545–)
            • Jeanne (1547); Died Young.
            • Charles (1549–1550); Died Young.
            • Philippe (1550–)
            • Marguerite (1551–)
            • Frédéric (1553–)
            • Hélène (1554–)
            • Charlotte (1555); Died Young.
            • Maximilian (1557 –)
            • François-Wenceslaus (1559 –)
            • Ladislaus (1560); Died Young.
            • Eleanor (1562); Died Young.
          • M2. Anne (1533–1587) m. Theodor of Bavaria, Duke of Bavaria (1526–1581); Had Issue.
          • M2. Charles, Archbishop-Elector of Cologne (1535–1601)
          • M2. Adélaïde (1537–1593) m. Charles-Rémi, Duke of Vendôme (1524–1571)
          • M2. Michèle, Abbess of Nivelles (1538–1599)
          • M2. Jean, Duke of Chartres (1541–1602)
          • [Ilg.] with Johanna Maria van der Gheynst: Jeanne (1522–1558) m. Lorenzo III of Florence (1519–1563)
        • Isabella (1501–1526) m. Christian II, King of Denmark & Norway (1481–1559); Had Issue.
        • Fernando VI, King of Spain (1503–1564) m. Isabella of Portugal(1503–1543); Had Issue.
          • Fernando VII Alonso, King of Spain (1528–1577) m1. Beatriz of Portugal (1530–1548); Had Issue. m2. Mary of England (1535–1564); Had Issue.
            • M1. Fernando (1548); Died Young.
            • M2. Juan, Prince of Asturias (1551–)
            • M2. Henrique (1553–)
            • M2. Alfonso (1554); Died Young.
            • M2. Maria Ceferina (1556–)
            • M2. Isabella Felisa (1557–)
            • M2. Carlos (1559–1561); Died Young.
            • M2. Joanna (1560–)
            • M2. Fernando (1563); Died Young.
          • Maria (1529–1569) m. Carlos Manuel, Crown Prince of Portugal (1522–1555); No Surviving Issue.
          • Isabella (1530–1531); Died Young.
          • Manuel (1531 –)
          • Juan (1533 –)
          • Carlos (1536 –)
          • Catarina (1537); Died Young.
          • Enrique (1538 –)
          • Leonor (1540 –) m. Filippo Emanuele, Duke of Milan & Orléans, Lord of Genoa (1535–); Had Issue.
          • Maximiliano (1541 –)
          • Pedro (1543–1544); Died Young.
          • Margarita (1543 –)
        • Mary (1505 –) m. Louis II of Bohemia & Hungary, King of Bohemia & Hungary (1506–1526); Had Issue.
        • Catherine (1507–) m. Charles III of Savoy, Duke of Savoy (1486–1550)
      • Margaret, Governor of the Low Countries (1480–1536) m1. John of Aragon, Prince of Asturias & Girona (1478–1497); No Issue. m2. Philibert II, Duke of Savoy (1480–1504); No Issue.
    House of Valois: France
    • Louis XII, King of France (1462–1515) m1. Joan of France (1464–1505); ann. 1498—No Issue; m2. Anne of Brittany, Duchess of Brittany (1477–1514); Had Issue. m3. Eleanor of Austria(1498–1558); No Issue.
      • M2. Claude, Duchess of Brittany (1499–1526); m. Francis, King of France (1494–1547); Had Issue.
      • M2. Renée, Duchess of Chartres (1510–1573) m. Charles V of Austria, Holy Roman Emperor (1500–1555); Had Issue.
    • Charles, Count of Angoulême (1459–1496); m. Louise of Savoy(1476–1531); Had Issue.
      • Marguerite (1492–1549); m1. Charles IV, Duke of Alençon (1489–1525); No Issue. m2. Henri II of Navarre, King of Navarre (1503–1555); Had Issue.
      • François, King of France (1494–1547) m1. Claude of France, Duchess of Brittany (1499–1522); Had Issue. m2. Beatrice of Portugal(1504–)
        • M1. Louise (1515–1545) m. Louis IV of Naples (1500 –); Had Issue.
        • M1. Charlotte (1516–1565) m. Alexander IV of Scotland, King of Scots (1514–1572); Had Issue.
        • M1. Madeleine (1517–1518); Died Young.
        • M1. Anne, Abbess of Saint-Pierre-les-Dames (1518–1551); Died Unmarried.
        • M1. François II, King of France (1519–1568) m. Isabella of Austria(1521–1567); Had Issue.
          • François, Dauphin of France (1539–1559) m. Isabella of England (1542–1592); Had Issue.
            • Marie-Révérie (1559–)
          • Louise (1541); Died Young.
          • Louis (1542–1551); Died Young.
          • Charles IX, King of France (1543–)
          • Henri (1547–1549); Died Young.
          • Marie (1549–)
          • Claude (1550–)
          • Philippe (1551); Died Young.
          • Jeanne (1552–)
        • M1. Charles (1520–1529); Died Young.
        • M1. Victoire (1521–) m. Wilhelm of Cleves, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg (1516–); Had Issue.
        • M1. Louis, Duke of Orléans (1522–1538); No Issue.
        • [Ilg.] with Anne de Boullan: Elisabeth (1526 –) m1. François of Bourbon, Count of Enghien (1519–1546); No Issue. m2. Heinrich of Württemberg (1516–); Had Issue.
        • [Ilg.] with Anne de Boullan: Jacqueline (1530 –) m. Gaspard II de Coligny, Seigneur de Châtillon (1519–);
        • [Ilg.] with Anne de Boullan: Ottavio, Duke of Parma (1533–) m. Francesca Grimaldi (1536–);
        • M2. Marie (1533); Died Young.
        • M2. Filippo Emanuele, Duke of Milan & Orléans, Lord of Genoa (1535 –) m. Leonor of Spain (1540–); Had Issue.
        • [Ilg.] with Anne de Boullan: Marguerite (1536); Died Young.
        • [Ilg.] with Anne de Boullan: Charles-Hercule (1540); Died Young.
        • M2. Marie (1542 –)
    • René, Duke of Alençon (1454–1492) m1. Marguerite of Harcourt (14??–14??); No Issue. m2. Marguerite of Lorraine(1463–1521); Had Issue.
      • M2. Charles IV, Duke of Alençon (1489–1527) m. Marguerite of Angoulême (1492–1549); No Issue.
      • M2. Françoise (1490–1546) m1. François of Orléans, Duke of Longueville (1478–1512); m2. Charles of Bourbon, Duke of Vendôme (1489–1537)
      • M2. Anne (1492–1562) m. William IX Palaeologus, Marquis of Montferrat (1486–1518); Had Issue.
    House of Albret (1479–1555) / House of Clèves-Nevers (1555–): Navarre
    • Catherine of Navarre, Queen of Navarre (1468–1517) m. Jean III, King of Navarre(1469–1516); Had Issue.
      • Anne (1492–1532); Died Unmarried.
      • Magdalene (1494–1504); Died Young.
      • Catherine, Abbess of the Trinity at Caen (1495–1532); Unmarried.
      • Joan (1496); Died Young.
      • Quiteria, Abbess of Montvilliers (1499–1536); Unmarried.
      • Andrew Phoebus (1501–1503); Died Young.
      • Henri II, King of Navarre (1503–1555) m. Marguerite of Angoulême(1492–1549); Had Issue.
        • Jeanne (1528); Died Young.
        • Françoise Fébé (1531 –) m. François II of Clèves, King of Navarre (Jure Uxoris) & Duke of Nevers (1520–1563); Had Issue.
          • Henriette (1553); Died Young.
          • Henri (1555–1557); Died Young.
          • François, Prince of Viana (1556–)
          • Quiterie (1558–)
          • Louis, Duke of Rethel (1559–1579)
          • Catherine (1560–)
        • Jean (1533); Died Young.
      • Buenaventura (1505–1510); Died Young.
      • Martin (1506–1512); Died Young.
      • François (1508–1512); Died Young.
      • Charles (1510–1543); Died Unmarried.
      • Isabelle (1513–1570) m1. Réne, Viscount of Rohan (1516–1537); Had Issue. m2. Gustav Vasa, King of Sweden (1496–1560); Had Issue.
    House of Lorraine: Lorraine & Naples
    • René II, Duke of Lorraine (1451–1508); m. Philippa of Guelders(1464 –); Had Issue.
      • Antoine, Duke of Lorraine (1489–1515) m. Renée of Bourbon (1494–1539); No Issue.
      • Claude (1496–1515) m. Antoinette of Bourbon(1494 –); Had Issue.
        • Marie (1515–1547) m. Ercole II d’Este, Duke of Ferrara, Modena & Reggio (1508 –); Had Issue.
      • Jean III, Duke of Lorraine (1498–1550) m. Maria of Montferrat(1508–1565)
        • François, Duke of Lorraine (1525 –)
        • Anne (1526); Died Young.
        • Claude (1528 –)
        • Nicholas (1529 –)
        • Antoine (1531 –)
        • Louis (1532); Died Young.
        • Philippe (1534–1536); Died Young.
        • Marie (1535 –)
        • Renée (1538 –)
        • Charles (1541 –)
      • Luigi IV, King of Naples (1500–1557) m1. Louise of France (1515–1545) m2. Isabella of Savoy, Duchess of Bari & Princess of Rossano(1529–1554); Had Issue.
        • M1. Francesca (1536–)
        • M1. Renato II, King of Naples (1537 –) m. Margarita of Spain (1543–); Had Issue.
        • M1. Giovanna (1538); Died Young.
        • M1. Antonio, Duke of Calabria (1541 –1580)
        • M1. Giovanni (1541–1545); Died Young.
        • M1. Claudia (1542 –)
        • M2. Maria Galazia, Duchess of Bari & Princess of Rossano (1554–1619) m. ???
      • François, Count of Vaudémont (1506–)
    House of Aviz: (1383–1580) / ???: (1580–): Portugal
    • Manuel, King of Portugal (1469–1521) m1. Isabella of Aragon, Princess of Asturias (1470–1498); Had Issue. m2. Maria of Aragon (1500–1517); Had Issue.
      • M1. Miguel, Prince of Asturias, and Portugal (1498–1500); Died Young.
      • M2. João III, King of Portugal (1502–1557); m. Eleanor of Austria(1498–1558); Had Issue.
        • Maria, Queen of Portugal (1521–1580) m. ???
        • Carlos Manuel, Hereditary Prince of Portugal (1522–1555) m. Maria of Spain(1529–1569); Had Issue.
          • Afonso Filipe (1544); Died Young.
          • João Fernando (1546); Died Young.
          • Leonor (1547); Died Young.
          • Manuel (1549); Died Young.
          • Matias (1551); Died Young.
          • João Benedito (1553); Died Young.
          • Joanna (1555); Died Young.
        • Afonso (1524–1526); Died Young.
        • Isabel (1526); Died Young.
        • João (1527); Died Young.
        • Joanna (1528–1533); Died Young.
        • Beatriz (1530–1548) m. Fernando VII Alonso, King of Spain (1528 –); Had Issue.
      • M2. Isabel (1503–1543) m. Fernando VI, King of Spain (1503–1564); Had Issue.
      • M2. Beatriz (1504 –) m1. François I of France, King of France (1494–1547); Had Issue. m2. Ercole II of Ferrara, Duke of Ferrara, Modena & Reggio (1508–); Had Issue.
      • M2. Luís, Duke of Beja (1506 –)
      • M2. Fernando, Duke of Guarda (1507 –)
      • M2. Afonso, Bishop of Guarda (1509 –)
      • M2. Enrique (1512 –)
      • M2. Maria (1513); Died Young.
      • M2. Duarte, Duke of Guimarães (1515–1545) m. Isabella of Braganza (1511–); Had Issue.
      • M2. António (1516); Died Young.
    House of Oldenburg: Denmark-Norway
    • Christian I, King of Denmark (1426–1481) m. Dorothea of Brandenburg(1430–1495); Had Issue.
      • John, King of Denmark(1455–1513)
        • Christian II, King of Denmark (1481–1559) m. Isabella of Austria(1501–1526); Had Issue.
          • John II, King of England & Prince of Norway (1518–1548) m. Mary Tudor, Queen of England (1513 –); Had Issue.
            • SEE ENGLAND TREE.
          • Philip (1519); Died Young.
          • Maximilian (1519); Died Young.
          • Dorothea (1520 –) m. Otto of Pomerania, Duke of Pomerania (1517 –); Had Issue.
          • Christina (1521 –) m. Ludwig X of Bavaria, Duke of Bavaria (1495–1545); Had Issue.
      • Margaret (1456–1486) m. James III of Scotland, King of Scots (1452–1488)
      • Frederick I, King of Denmark (1471–1533) m1. Anna of Brandenburg (1487–1514); Had Issue. m2. Sophia of Pomerania (1498–); Had Issue.
        • M1. Christian (III), Pretended King of Denmark (1503–1542) m. Dorothea of Saxe-Lauenburg (1511 –); No Issue.
        • M1. Dorothea (1504 –) m. Albrecht of Prussia, Duke of Prussia (1490 –); Had Issue.
        • M2. Hans (1521 –)
        • M2. Elizabeth (1524 –)
        • M2. Adolf (1526 –)
        • M2. Anne (1527–1535); Died Young.
        • M2. Dorothea (1528 –)
        • M2. Frederik (1532 –)
    House of Vasa: Sweden
    • Gustav Vasa, King of Sweden (1496–1560) m1. Catherine of Saxe-Lauenburg (1513–1537); Had Issue. m2. Isabelle of Navarre(1513–1571); Had Issue.
      • M1. Catherine (1533); Died Young.
      • M2. Carl IX, King of Sweden (1540 –)
      • M2. Johann (1541 –)
      • M2. Elisabet (1542 –)
      • M2. Magnus (1543–)
      • M2. Margareta (1546–1549); Died Young.
      • M2. Henrik (1547 –)
      • M2. Erik (1551–1556); Died Young.
      • M2. Catherine (1553); Died Young.
    House of Zápolya: Hungary
    • John Zápolya, King of Hungary (1487–1540) m. Anne of Bohemia & Hungary(1503–1568)
      • Anna (1527 –)
      • Mary (1528–1540); Died Young.
      • Catherine (1530 –)
      • Elizabeth (1531 –)
      • Helena (1533 –)
      • John Louis (1536–1539); Died Young.
      • John II Vladislaus, King of Hungary (1539 –)
      • Stephan (1541 –)
    House of Jagiellon: Poland
    • Sigismund, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (1467–1548) m. Barbara Zápolya(1495–1532); Had Issue.
      • Hedwig (1513 –) m. Albrecht of Prussia, Duke of Prussia (1490 –); Had Issue.
      • Sigismund II, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (1515–1554) m. Marie of Austria (1522–1556); No Issue.
      • Alexander II, King of Poland & Grand Duke of Lithuania (1516–) m1. Margarete of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (1516–1552); m2. Marie of Austria (1522–1556); Had Issue. m3. ???
        • M1. Barbara (1541 –)
        • M1. Sigismund (1543–1545); Died Young.
        • M1. Constance (1545–1551); Died Young.
        • M1. Margaret (1546); Died Young.
        • M1. Casimir (1549–1550); Died Young.
        • M1. Elizabeth (1551–1552); Died Young.
        • M2. Maria Bonifacia (1555 –)
        • M2. Isabella (1556 –)
      • Anna (1520 –)
      • Sophia (1523 –)
      • Catherine (1524 –)
      • Casimir (1527); Died Young.
    House of Rurik: Muscovy
    • Vasili III, Grand Duke of Moscow (1479–1533) m1. Solomonia Saburova (1490 -1542); No Issue. m2. Elena Glinskaya(1510–)
      • Ivan (1530); Died Young.
      • Vasili IV, Grand Prince of Moscow (1531 –) m. ???
    THE MAJOR PRINCELY HOUSES OF GERMANY —

    House of Wittelsbach: Electoral Palatinate & Bavaria

    • Wilhelm IV, Duke of Bavaria (1493–1550) m. Jacobea of Baden(1503 –); Had Issue.
      • Theodor, Duke of Bavaria (1526–) m. Anne of Austria(1533–); Had Issue.
        • ???
      • Anna (1528–1531); Died Young.
      • Albrecht (1529); Died Young.
      • Mechtilde (1532 –)
    • Ludwig X, Duke of Bavaria (1495–1545) m. Christina of Denmark(1521–); Had Issue.
      • Albrecht (1543 –)
      • Magdalene (1544 –)
      • Ludwig (1545 –)
    • Louis V, Count Palatine of the Rhine (1478–1544) m. Sibylle of Bavaria (1489–1523); No Issue.
    • Friedrich II, Count Palatine of the Rhine (1482–1550) m. Anna of Cleves(1515–1564); Had Issue.
      • Friedrich III, Count Palatine of the Rhine (1545–)
    House of Hohenzollern: Brandenburg & Prussia
    • Joachim Nestor, Elector of Brandenburg (1484–1535) m. Elizabeth of Denmark(1485–1555)
      • Joachim II Hektor, Elector of Brandenburg (1505 –) m1. Magdalena of Saxony (1507–1535); Had Issue. m2. Isabella Maria d’Este(1519 –); Had Issue.
        • M1. Johann Georg (1526); Died Young.
        • M1. Barbara (1528 –)
        • M1. Elisabeth (1529 –)
        • M1. Friedrich (1531 –)
        • M1. Johann (1532); Died Young.
        • M1. Albrecht (1532); Died Young.
        • M1. Christine (1535–1539); Died Young.
        • M2. Alfons Herkules (1542 –)
        • M2. Maria (1545 –)
        • M2. Joachim (1546 –)
        • M2. Elisabeth Lukretia (1548); Died Young.
      • Anna (1507 –)
      • Elisabeth (1510 –)
      • Margareta (1511 –)
      • Johann (1513–1517); Died Young.
    • Friedrich I, Margrave of Ansbach & Bayruth (1460–1536) m1. Sophia of Poland(1479–1512); Had Issue.
      • Kasimir, Margrave of Brandenburg-Kulmbach (1481–1529) m. Susanna of Bavaria(1502 –); Had Issue.
        • Marie (1519 –)
        • Albrecht (1522–1526); Died Young.
        • Kunigunde (1524 –)
        • Friedrich II, Margrave of Brandenburg-Kulmbach (1525 –)
    • Margarete (1483–1532); No Issue.
    • Georg, Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach (1484 –) m1. Beatrice de Frangepan (1480–1510); No Issue. m2. Hedwig of Münsterberg-Oels (1508–1531); Had Issue. m3. Emilie of Saxony(1516 –); Had Issue.
      • M2. Anna Maria (1526 –)
      • M2. Sabina (1531); Died Young.
      • M3. Sophie (1535 –)
      • M3. Barbara (1536 –)
      • M3. Georg Friedrich (1537 –)
    • Sophie (1485–1537) m. Friedrich II of Legnica, Duke of Legnica (1480 –); Had Issue.
    • Anna (1487–1539) m. Wenceslaus II of Cieszyn (1488–1524); Had Issue.
    • Albrecht, Duke of Prussia (1490 –) m1. Dorothea of Denmark (1504–1535); Had Issue. m2. Hedwig of Poland(1513 –); Had Issue.
      • M1. Anna Sophia (1527); Died Young.
      • M1. Albrecht (1528); Died Young.
      • M1. Dorothea (1531 –)
      • M1. Lucia (1534 –)
      • M2. Albrecht Sigismund (1536 –)
      • M2. Barbara (1537–1540); Died Young.
      • M2. Hedwig (1539 –)
      • M2. Friedrich (1541–1543); Died Young.
      • M2. Elisabeth Magdalena (1544 –)
    • Johann, Viceroy of Valencia (1493–1525) m. Germaine of Foix(1488 –1536); Had Issue.
      • Violante, Infanta of Brandenburg (1525 –)
    • Elisabeth (1494–1518) m. Ernst of Baden-Durlach (1482 –); Had Issue.
    • Barbara (1495 –) m. George III of Leuchtenberg (1502 –); Had Issue.
    • Friedrich (1497 –); Died Unmarried.
    • Wilhelm, Archbishop of Riga (1498 –); Died Unmarried.
    • Johann Albrecht, (1499 –); Died Unmarried.
    • Gumprecht, (1503–1528); Died Unmarried.
    House of Wettin: Saxony
    • Johann, Elector of Saxony (1468–1532) m1. Sophie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (1481–1503); Had Issue. m2. Margarete of Anhalt-Köthen(1494–1521); Had Issue.
      • M1. Johann Friedrich, Duke of Saxony (1503 –) m. Sybille of Cleves(1512 –); Had Issue.
        • Johann Friedrich (1528 –)
        • Johann Wilhelm (1530 –)
        • Sybille (1536 –)
        • Johann Ernst (1538–1540); Died Young.
      • M2. Maria (1515 –)
      • M2. Margaret (1518 –)
      • M2. Johann (1519 –)
      • M2. Johann Ernst (1521); Died Young.
    • Georg, Duke of Saxony (1471–1539) m. Barbara Jagiellon(1478–1534); Had Issue.
      • Johann (1498–1537) m. Elisabeth of Hesse (1502–1557); No Issue.
      • Friedrich (1505–1531); Died Unmarried.
      • Christine (1505–1549) m. Philipp, Landgrave of Hesse (1504 –); Had Issue.
      • Magdalena (1507 –)
    • Heinrich IV, Duke of Saxony (1473–1541) m. Catherine of Mecklenburg(1487–1561); Had Issue.
      • Sybille (1515 –)
      • Emilie (1516 –)
      • Sidonie (1518 –)
      • Maurice (1521); Died Young.
      • Severin, Elector of Saxony (1522 –) m. Anna Gennara of Savoy(1528 –); Had Issue.
        • ???
      • Augustus (1526 –)
    House of Griffin: Pomerania
    • Bogislaw X, Duke of Pomerania (1454–1523) m. Anna of Poland(1476–1503); Had Issue.
      • Anna (1492 –) m. Georg of Brieg, Duke of Legnica (1481–1523); No Issue.
      • Georg (1493–1525) m. Amalie of the Palatinate(1490–1524); Had Issue.
        • Bogislaw (1514); Died Young.
        • Philipp (1515–1518); Died Young.
        • Margaret (1518–1521); Died Young.
      • Kasimir VIII, Duke of Pomerania (1494–1549) m. Anna of Brunswick-Lüneburg(1501 –); Had Issue.
        • Otto IV, Duke of Pomerania (1517–) m. Dorothea of Denmark(1520 –); Had Issue.
          • ???
        • Bogislaw (1519–1521); Died Young.
        • Wartislaw (1520 –)
        • Anna (1522 –)
        • Sophie (1525 –)
        • Barnim (1526–1540); Died Unmarried.
        • Georgia (1529 –)
        • Johann Friedrich (1531–1537); Died Young.
      • Sophie (1498 –) m. Frederick of Denmark, King of Denmark & Norway (1471–1533); Had Issue.
      • Barnim (1501–1514); Died Young.
      • Otto (1503–1518); Died Young.
    House of Ascania: Saxe-Lauenburg & Anhalt
    • Wolfgang, Prince of Anhalt-Köthen (1492 –)
    • Ernst, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau (1454–1516) m. Margarete of Münsterburg-Oels (1473–1530); Had Issue.
      • Thomas (1503); Died Young.
      • Johann V, Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst (1504 –)
      • Georg III, Prince of Anhalt-Plötzkau (1507 –); Unmarried.
      • Joachim, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau (1509 –); Unmarried.
    • Magnus, Duke of Saxe-Lauenburg (1470–1543) m. Katharina of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel(1488 –); Had Issue.
      • Franz, Duke of Saxe-Lauenburg (1510 –)
      • Dorothea (1511 –) m. Christian of Denmark (1503–1543); No Issue.
    House of Welf: Brunswick-Lüneberg, Calenberg, Grubenhagen & Wolfenbüttel
    • Ernest, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg (1497 –)
    • Eric, Prince of Calenberg (1470–1540) m1. Katharina of Saxony (1468–1524); No Issue. m2. Elisabeth of Brandeburg(1510 –); Had Issue.
      • M2. Elisabeth (1526 –)
      • M2. Eric II, Prince of Calenberg (1528 –)
      • M2. Anna Maria (1532 –)
      • M2. Katharina (1534 –)
    • Ernest III, Duke of Brunswick-Grubenhagen (1518 –) m.
    • Heinrich V, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (1489 –) m. Maria of Württemburg(1496–1541); Had Issue.
      • Margarete (1516 –)
      • Andreas (1517 –)
      • Katharina (1518 –)
      • Marie (1521 –)
      • Karl Viktor (1525–1527); Died Young.
      • Philipp Magnus (1527 –)
      • Julius (1528 –)
      • Clara (1532 –)
    House of La Marck: Cleves-Jülich-Berg
    • Johann III, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg (1490–1539) m. Maria of Jülich-Berg(1491–1543); Had Issue.
      • Sybille (1512 –) m. Johann Friedrich, Elector of Saxony (1503 –); Had Issue.
      • Anna (1515 –) m. Friedrich II, Elector of the Palatinate (1482 –); Had Issue.
      • Wilhelm, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg (1516 –) m. Victoire of France (1521 –); Had Issue.
      • Amalia (1517 –); Unmarried.
    • Charles II, Count of Nevers (1491–1522) m. Marie d’Albret, Countess of Rethel(1491–1549); Had Issue.
      • François II, King of Navarre (Jure Uxoris) & Duke of Nevers (1520–) m. Françoise Fébé, Queen of Navarre(1531–); Had Issue.
        • SEE NAVARRE TREE.
    House of Württemberg: Württemberg
    • Ulrich, Duke of Würrtemberg (1487–1550) m. Sabina of Bavaria(1492 –)
      • Anna (1513); Died Young.
      • Heinrich, Duke of Württemberg (1516 –) m. Élisabeth of Angoulême (1526 –); Had Issue.
    • Georg, Count of Montbéliard (1498 –)
    THE MAJOR PRINCELY HOUSES OF ITALY —

    List of Popes of the Roman Catholic Church:
    • Leo X, Born Giovanni di Medici (1475–1521); R. 1513–1521
    • Pius IV, Born Pompeo Colonna (1479–1527); R. 1521–1527
    • Pius V, Born Giovanni Piccolomini (1475–1541); R. 1527–1541
    • Gelasius III, Born Girolamo Ghinucci (1480–1549); R. 1541–1549
    • Adrian VI, Born Reginald Pole (1500–1559) R. 1550–
    House of Savoy: Savoy
    • Filippo II, Duke of Savoy (1438–1497) m1. Madeleine of Bourbon (1438–1483); Had Issue. m2. Claudine de Brosse(1450–1513); Had Issue.
      • M1. Louise (1476–1531) m. Charles d’Orléans, Count of Angoulême (1459–1496)
      • M1. Filiberto II, Duke of Savoy (1480–1504) m. Margaret of Austria (1480–1536); No Issue.
      • M2. Carlo III, Duke of Savoy (1486–1550) m. Catherine of Austria(1507–); Had Issue.
        • Giovanna (1526); Died Young.
        • Caterina (1527–1546)
        • Anna Gennara (1528 –) m. Severin of Saxony, Duke of Saxony (1522 –); Had Issue.
        • Maria (1529–1531); Died Young.
        • Carlo (1530–1534); Died Young.
        • Filiberto (1532); Died Young.
        • Filippo III Giano Amadeo, Duke of Savoy (1533 –) m. ???
        • Antonia (1535–1538); Died Young.
      • M2. Ludovico (1488–1502); Died Young.
      • M2. Philippe, Duke of Nemours (1490–1529) m. Bona Sforza, Duchess of Bari & Princess of Rossano (1494 –); Had Issue.
        • Isabella of Savoy (1529–1554) m. Luigi IV, King of Naples (1500–1554); Had Issue.
      • M2. Assolone (1494); Died Young.
      • M2. Giovanni Amadeo (1495); Died Young.
      • M2. Filiberta (1498–1524) m. Giuliano di Medici, Duke of Nemours (1479–1516); Had Issue.
    House of Palaelogus: Montferrat
    • William IX, Marquis of Montferrat (1486–1518) m. Anne d’Alençon(1492–1562); Had Issue.
      • Maria (1508–1565) m. Jean III, Duke of Lorraine (1498–1550); Had Issue.
      • Margherita (1510–1566) m. ???
      • Boniface IV, Marquis of Montferrat (1512–1551) m1. Marie of Bourbon (1515–1538); Had Issue. m2. Lucrèce Medici, Dame of Fossan(1516–1587); Had Issue.
        • M1. Anna (1532–)
        • M1. Francesca (1535–)
        • M1. Carlotta (1538); Died Young.
        • M2. Teodoro III, Duke of Montferrat (1541–1595)
        • M2. Guiliana (1543–)
    House of Este: Ferrara, Modena & Reggio
    • Alfonso, Duke of Ferrara, Modena & Reggio (1476–1534) m1. Anna Sforza (1476–1497); No Issue. m2. Lucrezia Borgia (1480–1519); Had Issue. m3. Laura Dianti(14??–1573); Had Issue.
      • M2. Alessandro (1505); Died Young.
      • M2. Ercole II, Duke of Ferrara, Modena & Reggio (1508 –) m1. Marie of Lorraine (1515 – 1547); Had Issue. m2. Beatriz of Portugal(1504 –); Had Issue.
        • M1. Alfonso (1534–1550); Died Unmarried.
        • M1. Francesco (1536 – 1538); Died Young.
        • M1. Ercole (1537 – 1538); Died Young.
        • M1. Maria Antoinetta (1543 –)
        • M1. Claudio (1545–)
        • M2. Isabella (1550–)
      • M2. Ippolito, Archbishop of Milan (1509 –)
      • M2. Alessandro (1514–1516); Died Young.
      • M2. Leonora (1515 –); Unmarried.
      • M2. Francesco (1516 –)
      • M2. Isabella Maria (1519 –) m. Joachim II Hektor, Elector of Brandenburg (1505 –); Had Issue.
    House of Medici: Florence
    • Lorenzo, Lord of Florence (1449–1492) m. Clarice Orsini(1453–1488); Had Issue.
      • Lucrezia (1470–1551) m. Jacopo Salviati (1461–1533)
      • Piero, Lord of Florence (1472–1503) m. Alfonsina Orsini(1472–1520); Had Issue.
        • Clarice (1489–1528) m. Filippo Strozzi (1489–1538)
        • Lorenzo II, Lord of Florence & Duke of Urbino (1492–1519) m. Madeleine de la Tour d’Auvergne, Countess of Boulogne & Lady of St. Saturnin(1498–1519); Had Issue.
          • Lorenzo III, Duke of Florence (1519–1563) m. Jeanne of Austria (1522–1558); Had Issue.
            • Maddalena (1542–1544); Died Young.
            • Francesco (1544–1545); Died Young.
            • Pietro, Grand Duke of Tuscany (1545–)
            • Maria (1546–)
            • Cosimo (1548–)
            • Anna (1550–)
            • Giovanni (1551); Died Young.
            • Isabella (1553–)
            • Carlo (1553–)
        • Luisa (1494); Died Young.
      • Maddalena (1473–1528) m. Franceschetto Cybo, Duke of Spoletto (1450–1519)
      • Contessina Beatrice (1474); Died Young.
      • Pope Leo X (1475–1521); Born Giovanni
      • Luisa (1477–1488); Died Young.
      • Contessina Antonia (1478–1515) m. Piero Ridolfi (1469–1525)
      • Guiliano, Duke of Nemours (1479–1516) m. Filiberta of Savoy(1498–1524)
        • [Ilg.] with Pacifica Brandano: Ippolito (1511 –)
        • Lucrèce, Dame of Fossan (1516–1587) m1. Louis II d’Orléans, Duke of Longueville (1510–1537); Had Issue. m2. Boniface IV Palaeologus, Marquis of Montferrat (1512–1567); Had Issue.
    MISCELLANEOUS NOBLE HOUSES —

    House of Bourbon – Duke of Bourbon & Vendôme

    • Charles III, Duke of Bourbon (1490–1529) m. Suzanne of Bourbon, Duchess of Bourbon(1491–1521); Had Issue.
      • François, Cardinal-Duke of Bourbon & Archbishop of Lyons (1517–1583); Died Unmarried.
    • Charles, Duke of Vendôme (1489–1537) m. Françoise of Alençon(1490–1546); Had Issue.
      • Louis, Duke of Vendôme (1514–1546); Died Unmarried.
      • Marie (1515–1538) m. Boniface IV, Marquis of Montferrat (1512–1551); Had Issue.
      • Marguerite (1516–1559); Died Unmarried.
      • Antoinette (1518 –)
      • François, Count of Enghien (1519–1546) m. Élisabeth of Angoulême (1526 –); No Issue.
      • Madeleine, Abbess of Sainte-Croix de Poitiers (1521–1561)
      • Louis (1522–1532); Died Young.
      • Charles Rémi, Duke of Vendôme (1524 –) m. Adélaïde of Austria (1537–)
      • Catherine, Abbess of Soissons (1525–1594)
      • Renée, Abbess of Chelles (1527–1583)
      • François, Count of Soissons & Enghien (1528 –)
      • Jean, Prince of Condé (1530 –)
    House of Boullan – Duke of Plaisance & Duke of Valentinois:
    • Thomas Boleyn (1477–1539) m. Elizabeth Howard(1480–1538); Had Issue.
      • Marie (1499–1556) m. Jean du Tillet, Sieur de La Bussiére (1500–1561); Had Issue.
      • Georges, Duke of Valentinois (1504–1557) m. Louise Borgia, Dame of Châlus (1500–1553); Had Issue.
        • Charlotte (1535); Died Young.
        • Alain, Duke of Valentinois (1538 –)
        • Jean (1541 –)
      • Anne, Duchess of Plaisance (1507–)
    House of Le Trémoille – Duke of Thouars:
    • François, Viscount of Thouars (1505–1541) m. Anne de Laval, Princess of Tarente (1505–1554); Had Issue.
      • Louis III, Duke of Thouars (1521–1577) m. Catherine Stuart, Countess of Boulogne(1522–1593); Had Issue.
        • Madeleine (1544–)
        • Jean, Count of Brenon (1546–1570); Died Unmarried.
        • Alexandre, Duke of Thouars (1550–1611)
        • Jacques, Count of Boulogne (1552–1600)
        • Anne-Hippolyte (1555–1609)
    House of Chalon – Prince of Orange:
    • Philibert, Prince of Orange (1502 –) m. Elisabeth of Nassau-Siegen(1515–1543); Had Issue.
      • Antoine (1531–1535); Died Young.
      • Guillaume (1533 –)
      • René (1536–1537); Died Young.
      • Charlotte (1538 –)
    House of Brandon – Viscount of Strêye:
    • Charles, Viscount of Strêye (1484–1545) m1. Anne Browne (14??–1513); Had Issue. m2. Anna of Egmont(1504 –); Had Issue.
      • M1. Anne (1507 –) m. Jean Micault (15??–1539); No Issue.
      • M1. Maria (1510 –) m. Viglius Aytta van Zwichem (1507 –); Had Issue.
      • M2. Henri, Viscount of Strêye (1532 –) m. Antoinette of Glymes (1535 –)
      • M2. Jeanne (1535 –)
      • M2. Charles, Sieur of Erbisœul (1536–1557); Died Unmarried.
     
    Last edited:
    Top