WI: The Rampart Scandal was much worse?

The LAPD Rampart Scandal is considered a dark period for the Los Angeles police force. Over seventy police officers were implicated by the highly questionable and illegal activities of C.R.A.S.H. Gangs thrived, crime increased and the effects are still felt today.

This caused many ramifications for obvious reasons.

So, what if it was even worse? What would happen to the LAPD? How would this affect the public? The City Mayor?
 
You could get the LAPD taken over by the Feds after a thorough house-cleaning decapitating command staff under a "consent" decree that made Reconstuction look warm and fuzzy until the DOJ decides LAPD or whatever successor organization takes over is run by competent adults.

Street policing would be butt-sexed for a decade until the command staff got a handle on acceptable training/ROE protocols. LAPD wouldn't be able to tie their shoes w/o the Feds signing off in triplicate then giving the whole thing a miss when the costs of oversight get too burdensome.

LSS, if you think the Ramparts scandal is bad, just wait until the Feds step in. Things could definitely be worse.

I'm NOT a huge fan of LAPD and how they policed minority neighborhoods like an occupying army.

However, NOBODY was ready for how the crack epidemic was going to fuel fratricidal bloodbaths. Not the feds, not the LAPD, not anyone knew what to do to what extent.

Most importantly, the nature of gangs changed from folks that lived in neighborhoods since day one and had a myriad reasons to keep beefs just to active players and allowed older members become emeritus and live straight lives to ihilistic folks like MS-13.
MS-13's leaders grew up in El Salvador's civil war with beheadings, massacres, and so forth. They had no expectations of living past their twenties or allowing members to go straight. You bang until you're dead or in jail.
Gangs of every stripe adapted to the new levels of violence until sanity reasserted itself when most of the folks calling for that level of violence were dead or LWOP'd and folks got back to business rather than privng whatever point.
LAPD's response was more firepower, and letting folks off the leash to intimidate folks into compliance. We saw how that worked with the Rodney King riots and a myriad other ghastly messes.

What really screwed with policing efforts was the fact that the level of violence they could inflict was nowhere near what the gangs would do to people that crossed them.
Anyone who told on gang members died or horribly maimed.
If you're choices are a BS OOJ beef and a few months in County vs dying or getting permanently maimed, they'll clam up and take the jail time.
 
Rodney King was a lightning rod issue that had very little to do with the facts.

Folks in various communities didn't trust the cops, the state police, or the feds b/c cops of whatever stripe seemed above accountability, yet could get folks in prison for decades on flimsy or fabricated evidence.

IAD, who was supposed to be the cops keeping the LAPD honest, were widely considered among the rank-and-file a political hit squad taking out folks unpopular with the the powers-that-be rather than the real bad apples.

Cops saw no reason to throw their buddies under the bus for anything less than murdering folks in cold blood or dealing drugs.
That allowed a lot of folks leeway to be assholes until the feds (DOJ/FBI) made it a civil rights violation beef, which investigating THAT would bring all the other sins to light.

The current model of community policing supposedly makes cops less faceless and more approachable. More folks watching means hopefully, cops won't feel either the siege mentality or license to do funky stuff they did pre-1990's.

So to more fully answer your question- LA burns until order is restored.

Eventually, a government emerges that has the public's confidence and the department that isn't burdened with the myriad lawsuits, consent decrees, etc I described probably a decade later.

It could effectively cripple the city or lead to a fissioning of LA into several pieces depending on how draconian the consent decrees are.

What this does is marooning the poor neighborhoods in squalor w no tax base while the nice neighborhoods flourish. How much the CA state goverment and Feds pick up the slack (bwa-ha-ha!) youu can probably imagine.
 
How long until L.A.'s reputation is repaired? Obviously, it wouldn't be a model city but it couldn't stay that bad until modern day... could it?
 
Top