On Feb 16, 1940, the German naval auxiliary Altmark entered Norwegian waters on her way back to Germany. Her status as neither purely a warship nor a merchant vessel, prevented Norway from outright denying her passage. So after several searches by the Norwegian authorities, which failed to discover the presence of British prisoners aboard, the Altmark proceeded under escort by 2 Norwegian warships.
The British having become aware of her presence, dispatched a group of 6 destroyers to intercept. The British under Captain Vian had orders to use any means necessary to capture the Altmark.
Also the local Norwegian commander, Lt. Halvorsen had received orders to use force in necessary to prevent violations of Norway's neutrality.
In the OTL, cooler heads prevented both sides from opening up on each other during this incident but what if it hadn't? What if either Commander had decided that the actions of the other warranted opening fire?
Considering the state of the Norwegian group( 2 very old destroyers) vs the Brits (3 modern destroyers onsite with 3 more close by in support), the final outcome of the skirmish is not in doubt but what do you all see as the political fallout from this?
The British having become aware of her presence, dispatched a group of 6 destroyers to intercept. The British under Captain Vian had orders to use any means necessary to capture the Altmark.
Also the local Norwegian commander, Lt. Halvorsen had received orders to use force in necessary to prevent violations of Norway's neutrality.
In the OTL, cooler heads prevented both sides from opening up on each other during this incident but what if it hadn't? What if either Commander had decided that the actions of the other warranted opening fire?
Considering the state of the Norwegian group( 2 very old destroyers) vs the Brits (3 modern destroyers onsite with 3 more close by in support), the final outcome of the skirmish is not in doubt but what do you all see as the political fallout from this?