Would Scotland actually go through with separating from England? Would Elizabeth II stay Queen of Scotland?
Probably not. Like with Brexit no one knew what they were voting for on a number of key issues.Would Scotland actually go through with separating from England? Would Elizabeth II stay Queen of Scotland?
But Brexit is looking very likely to happen. And unlike Brexit, there was a Scottish government that would take over and had produced a white paper on what their plans for an independent scotland would be. Scotland would leave, though with the difficulty it would have getting into the EU, coupled with the low fuel prices, I can't see them making much of a success of it up to this point.Probably not. Like with Brexit no one knew what they were voting for on a number of key issues.
I reckon they would have negotiated a deal to ukxit and put that deal to a referendum.
I imagine the Queen would have remained in either case.
Brexit will happen yes, but a lot of the people who voted for it are going to be unhappy. Once they trigger the exit process and start negotiating people will realise that they are not getting what they wanted.But Brexit is looking very likely to happen. And unlike Brexit, there was a Scottish government that would take over and had produced a white paper on what their plans for an independent scotland would be. Scotland would leave, though with the difficulty it would have getting into the EU, coupled with the low fuel prices, I can't see them making much of a success of it up to this point.
Maybe, after the fact, that will happen, but not till we have left. The same would go for Scotland.Brexit will happen yes, but a lot of the people who voted for it are going to be unhappy. Once they trigger the exit process and start negotiating people will realise that they are not getting what they wanted.
Brexit happening is a lot less likely in this scenario.Scottish independence and Brexit likely means a hard English Scottish border.
Query does Scotland have a special relationship to Northern Ireland?
The white paper came out before the referendum. Scotland was meant to be independent by 5 May 2016.The SNP gleefully start putting together a whitepaper on the future of Scotland.
Scotland leaving the UK means it also leaves the EU's customs union, which means the regulations would apply to about 80% of Scotland's exports rather than just the UK's 65%.Scottish economy suffers recession due to customs regulations on it's biggest trade partner; the rUK.
The white paper projected Scottish oil revenue in FY15/16, the year of independence, to be at minimum £6,800m. The actual figure was £60m, contributing towards an overall Scottish government deficit of £14.8bn (9.5% of GDP, or 27.6% of public sector revenue). As such, you're looking at massive cuts to a government budget which has actually grown in real terms since FY09/10. Lowering corporation tax would be the last thing the new Scottish government would be capable of doing.It is however shored up by the extra oil receipts from it's oil rich North Sea grounds (although smaller waters due to Orkney and Shetlands).Scotland lowers corporation tax further to encourage companies to set up shop in Scotland.
The issue with this is that once Scotland votes to leave the Union, there isn't much stopping them from actually having left by March 2016. Unlike Brexit, the Scottish and British Government are going to launch immediately into negotiations, and will have a clear picture on what will be happening on those key issues. Even if it's a shit deal at the end of it, the SNP aren't going to renegade on the referendum, and any further referendums will be on matters of constitutional affairs, not the deal that Holyrood gets from Whitehall.Probably not. Like with Brexit no one knew what they were voting for on a number of key issues.
I reckon they would have negotiated a deal to ukxit and put that deal to a referendum.
I imagine the Queen would have remained in either case.
If the Conservatives end up largest party in the next election (which isn't crazy but isn't likely), but without a majority and need to form a coalition, as long as it's not with UKIP the Referendum is the first thing on the chopping block for negotiations. It was always going to be, even when Cameron announced it.Brexit happening is a lot less likely in this scenario.
The white paper came out before the referendum. Scotland was meant to be independent by 5 May 2016.
Scotland leaving the UK means it also leaves the EU's customs union, which means the regulations would apply to about 80% of Scotland's exports rather than just the UK's 65%.
The white paper projected Scottish oil revenue in FY15/16, the year of independence, to be at minimum £6,800m. The actual figure was £60m, contributing towards an overall Scottish government deficit of £14.8bn (9.5% of GDP, or 27.6% of public sector revenue). As such, you're looking at massive cuts to a government budget which has actually grown in real terms since FY09/10. Lowering corporation tax would be the last thing the new Scottish government would be capable of doing.
The issue with this is that once Scotland votes to leave the Union, there isn't much stopping them from actually having left by March 2016. Unlike Brexit, the Scottish and British Government are going to launch immediately into negotiations, and will have a clear picture on what will be happening on those key issues. Even if it's a shit deal at the end of it, the SNP aren't going to renegade on the referendum, and any further referendums will be on matters of constitutional affairs, not the deal that Holyrood gets from Whitehall.
If the Conservatives end up largest party in the next election (which isn't crazy but isn't likely), but without a majority and need to form a coalition, as long as it's not with UKIP the Referendum is the first thing on the chopping block for negotiations. It was always going to be, even when Cameron announced it.
Query does Scotland have a special relationship to Northern Ireland?
Wasn't this put forward during the referendum, and the SNP roundly rejected it? I can't see them giving them up with no strings attached as soon as independence happens.- Scotland accepts the consequential independence of the Orkney and Shetland Islands; both become new Crown Dependencies of the rUK.
I can't see the rUK allowing Scotland into the pound, not just because they don't want to give Scotland an easy ride in order to prevent contagion to Wales or Northern Ireland, but because, after the Euro, all sides are thoroughly against entering into a currency union.- Scotland and rUK argue over the future of the Pound. Later on, rUK says Scotland can keep a single "Scottish Representative" on the board of the Bank of England and use the rUK Pound, but Scotland won't get any veto and will be outvoted almost all the time in policy decisions. Scotland is forced to accept this as the public are heavily against a new currency or adoption of the Euro, and the need to definitively settle the currency question for the sake of the economy.
Again, the UK wouldn't be interested in giving Scotland an easy ride, having just spent the referendum campaign saying how terrible things would be for them if they left. If they didn't want a hard border, then they could come to their own arrangements, rather than letting them into the EU.- Scotland informally negotiates for entry in to the European Union post independence. There is heavy resistance from Spain primarily, who want to set an example to Catalonia. Scotland is backed by the rUK, who don't want a hard border between rUK and Scotland, and Spain additionally wants to gain from rUK regarding Gibraltar. Stalemate, in the short term.
Keep in mind that in this scenario, Cameron has likely resigned. Whoever wins the subsequent leadership election will likely be more eurosceptic, though maybe not an outright leaver. They will make a big show of promising a referendum as the bare minimum, they would not backtrack on one having seen the Lib Dems get slaughtered over tuition fees, and alienate not only much of the public, but most of the membership, especially with the threat of UKIP still being in the back of their minds.If the Conservatives end up largest party in the next election (which isn't crazy but isn't likely), but without a majority and need to form a coalition, as long as it's not with UKIP the Referendum is the first thing on the chopping block for negotiations. It was always going to be, even when Cameron announced it.
I think Scottish independence has some very interesting implications for 2015 though. It is entirely possible that the honeymoon period for the next PM reaches toward May and is enough to cancel out the backlash regarding losing Scotland, but if it isn't, Labour can expect to gain seats over OTL. I doubt it would be enough to govern in majority though. However, it could be enough to push them into minority territory, with SNP support, whose MPs would still be elected and would sit till independence under the plans of the white paper. There isn't much reason to presume they would do significantly worse had they won the referendum, in fact, they might win even more seats if they can make pitch it as a vote for a strong negotiating position.
So you could have Ed Miliband governing for all of a year with SNP support whilst they are simultaneously negotiating the exit of Scotland from the UK. When that year runs out and independence takes place, depending on how many seats they won in 2015, Labour could be left without a majority, having just lost the party that was propping them up, and likely without any other party strong enough to push them into a stable majority, there would probably be a second election in 2016.
- Scotland and rUK argue over the future of the Pound. Later on, rUK says Scotland can keep a single "Scottish Representative" on the board of the Bank of England and use the rUK Pound, but Scotland won't get any veto and will be outvoted almost all the time in policy decisions. Scotland is forced to accept this as the public are heavily against a new currency or adoption of the Euro, and the need to definitively settle the currency question for the sake of the economy.
This is so wrong it's laughable. They have even less connection to the rest of the UK than Edinburgh. They would remain part of Scotland, unless you want a PoD well back in the past.- Scotland accepts the consequential independence of the Orkney and Shetland Islands; both become new Crown Dependencies of the rUK.
No.Would the English try to force the Scots to take Northern Ireland during the negotiations?