He smacked Bilbo's face with a punch OTLI mean, there's not much that Long can do against President Bilbo, as he found out against FDR.
And his hold over Lousiana was total
He smacked Bilbo's face with a punch OTLI mean, there's not much that Long can do against President Bilbo, as he found out against FDR.
Two thirds actually.Yeah he is. Northern democrats would not support a ticket for pure southerns. More to the point the Democratic party had a rule that said you needed 60% of the delegates to become the nominate, More likely you get a comprise candidate or an outright split.
What about other separatists groups? The Moorish temple, the Ethiopian Hebew Society, and the committee for a 49th state? By the thirties there is even a proto-Nation of Islam under W.D Fahd. I agree repatriation would have to be voluntary, but a large outlet, for housing, and the development of businesses might help. Remember in 24, Willson's son in Law McAdoo advocated a disability, and African American homeland in Alaska.As I understand it, the US sent about 8M soldiers abroad during WW2. That's a number in the range of your proposal. So the US DOES have the capacity to ship 12-15 million people, but it has to really mean it---as in mobilization levels for WW2 meaning it. It's unlikely that it would do anything requiring that level of mobilization of resources during the Depression unless it feels existentially threatened. I don't think Bilbo could sell the idea.
That said, I think Bilbo probably COULD significantly increase voluntary repatriation to Liberia and West Africa in general. That he might be able to sell with Garvey's help. But you'd probably be talking in the hundreds of thousands not the millions.
To.put it mildly!Assuming the plot was anything more than talk in the first place, I've always felt Butler played it up for dramatic effect.
None of these groups are all that big, and nowhere near all of the members are going to want to relocate. Liberia is at least vaguely a repatriation and a potential homeland moreso than Alaska. If you had a serious commitment to voluntary repatriation, I could see maybe a million repatriating at most, if you stretched the definition to include prisoners that you offered 5-10 years off their sentences if they voluntarily repatriated at the end of them.What about other separatists groups? The Moorish temple, the Ethiopian Hebew Society, and the committee for a 49th state? By the thirties there is even a proto-Nation of Islam under W.D Fahd. I agree repatriation would have to be voluntary, but a large outlet, for housing, and the development of businesses might help. Remember in 24, Willson's son in Law McAdoo advocated a disability, and African American homeland in Alaska.
The Soviet state forcibly deported 20 million ethnics before 1937, and the context is ethnic cleansing all the same.So even supposing what Montefiore has is correct, what does this have to do at all with state deportations? Because that was the conversation being had. And I cited pretty plainly that the number of actual forced deportations of ethnic groups never exceeded 5 or 6 million, let alone your proposed 12 to 15 million. And that’s entirely ignoring the different contexts between the two.
OTOH, his influence is unlikely to last long after his death.He smacked Bilbo's face with a punch OTL
And his hold over Lousiana was total
Hearst and Raskob's influence go a long way in the 1932 DNC...Two thirds actually.
LOL: Bilbo-Garvey 1936 for re-election!You make effective points. The committee is the most vibrate of the Non Garvey groups, a Perot style alliance of the extreme right, lets deport minorities, and the left, the former slaves need their own territiry to reach their full potential.
The Soviet state forcibly deported 20 million ethnics before 1937, and the context is ethnic cleansing all the same.
Not all of the deported were ethnic minorities: a significant proportion were kulaks and assorted "class enemies" as well."Ethnics" ?
Even if that number were accurate, the Soviets did not have to arrange oceanic transport; they could deport people by rail or even on foot. The Bilbo Administration does not have anywhere near enough ships to transport 15 million people to Africa, and he knows it. Any such "relocation plan" would be a fig leaf for rounding millions of people up, putting them on trains allegedly for seaports, but then taking them to extermination camps.
No thanks. I don't want to visit that America.
- It is the height of folly to assume that environment, discipline, education, and all other external devices can affect the blood, smooth down inequalities between individuals of the same breed, much less between different breeds, or transmute racial qualities. The Germans appreciate the importance of race values.They understand that racial improvement is the greatest asset that any country can have...They know, as few other nations have realized, that the impoverishment of race values contributes more to the impairment and destruction of a civilization than any other agency.”
- In a May 24, 1938 speech proposing legislation to return US blacks to Africa [citation needed]
Where did these extra 5 million come from??? You still won’t provide a source besides a vague citation from a non-specialist book, and now you just inflated your figure by a whopping 25% and refusing to elaborate in response to my questions. Including anyone arrested by the Soviet state as a deported ethnic group is questionable in this conversation.The Soviet state forcibly deported 20 million ethnics before 1937, and the context is ethnic cleansing all the same.
There is no extra 5 million. I have provided a source from a specialist book, and it's you who's deflating your figures.Where did these extra 5 million come from??? You still won’t provide a source besides a vague citation from a non-specialist book, and now you just inflated your figure by a whopping 25% and refusing to elaborate in response to my questions. Including anyone arrested by the Soviet state as a deported ethnic group is questionable in this conversation.
Embargoing the US would be economic suicide for Canada, let alone the British Empire.Meanwhile the Underground railroad is going to get started again and Canada is not. going to be happy. So you have to walk on a wire to not het the British Empire involved. And of course you are. going to lose a ton of you economy when Canada embargos your ass.
The 2nd Amendment does not work.And then we come to the gorilla in the room. A HUGE chunk of the population of the US was combat vets. And an even bigger part was armed and back then a lot of those armed folks were. good at hunting and the use if guns. What is often overlooked in the US is a goid percentage of the population recalls that at least in part the reason for the laws protecting gun ownership is in case the government gets out. if control, And at the start of this mess you gave a very small standing Army. (some of which are to oppose you based on the oath of protecting the country against enemies foreign and domestic) and each state had state controlled troops (to one degree or another) as well as county local and state law officers all of whom are not going to be exactly happy that you peed all over the Constitution. So you can pretty much be 99.99999999% sure you will. get an open rebelion one way or another and of you size or another.
In no war has the US ever fought for the abstract ideals of "freedom and democracy".Remember we can be synical as we want about why WW1 (and WW2 for that matter) Started but those boys and men (and the women that supported them and went as well) were doing. it to make the world safe for democracy. They may have failed or been missled but the reason THEY went was to make the world safe. You are now suggesting these same folks will just sit back losinging all there fredoms and rights and let fellow citzens. get rounded up and sent to what they will percieve as a savage unsafe land to die.
Not all Russians are "peasants", even in 1932.Sorry but this is not the personality of the average citezen in the US at that time. This is not Russia where everyone is unarmed and one step removed from having been pesents for the last 1000 year.
Murdering Bilbo would IMO only martyr him.So frankly if anyone was ever STUPID enough to try this the most probable result is he (the Idiot in question) probably died by the bullet of some unknown sniper. The reason the sniper is unknown is because no one is quite sure which 30 bullets from which of the 40 snippers is the one that actually Killed the idiot that took over the US. But we will get conspiracy. theories saying it was actually his Secret Service agents..
Your source stated 15 million, and then you said 20 million in your next post.There is no extra 5 million
Show me Simon Sebag Montefiore’s degree above the graduate level on Russian, Soviet, or even general history and I’ll grant you that it’s a specialist book. But you can’t do that because he doesn’t have that degree and it’s not a specialist book. It’s is not peer reviewed, and it is a narrative biography of Stalin marketed to a mass readership. You can at least point me to Montefiore’s citation for that figure, but you can’t argue that the book is a specialist one. Whatever it’s literary merits might be, it does not purport to be a specific examination of the Stalinist legal system focusing on mass deportations. My source is, and why you would disregard it without even a mention is beyond me.I have provided a source from a specialist book
Is this a joke? Where have I deflated “my figures”? I pointed you towards an accredited source on the subject which you entirely ignored in favor of Montefiore.it's you who's deflating your figures.
OK, never mind.Your source stated 15 million, and then you said 20 million in your next post.
Show me Simon Sebag Montefiore’s degree above the graduate level on Russian, Soviet, or even general history and I’ll grant you that it’s a specialist book. But you can’t do that because he doesn’t have that degree and it’s not a specialist book. It’s is not peer reviewed, and it is a narrative biography of Stalin marketed to a mass readership. You can at least point me to Montefiore’s citation for that figure, but you can’t argue that the book is a specialist one. Whatever it’s literary merits might be, it does not purport to be a specific examination of the Stalinist legal system focusing on mass deportations. My source is, and why you would disregard it without even a mention is beyond me.
Your source is, again, from the revisionist school, which makes it non-credible by definition.Is this a joke? Where have I deflated “my figures”? I pointed you towards an accredited source on the subject which you entirely ignored in favor of Montefiore.
It's "ethnically cleansed and then deported", not just "arrested and imprisoned". the number of people actually arrested and imprisoned by the Stalin regime pre-1937 was higher than that.You’ve also shifted the goalposts. We are discussing mass deportations under the Soviet Union, and suddenly you start citing a number purporting to be every single person arrested and imprisoned by the Stalin government prior to 1937. Am I to pretend like all imprisonments in the United States in 2022 can be subsumed under the category of “mass deportations and ethnic cleansings”? Because that’s nonsense. Categorically they are different things involving different processes and different resources and motives to undertake.
Ethnic cleansing and mass deportations definitely does not involve "trials and individualized processes of transportation". Stalinist mass deportations were even bigger than 12 million, so Bilbo would have been no better than Stalin here. Your sourcing is dubious and you are the one who's shifting goalposts and deflating numbers now.A penal colony system involving trials and individualized processes of transportation bears little resemblance to the rounding up of over twelve million African Americans in one sweeping decree, getting them all on boats, and sending them to West Africa. Soviet mass deportations do bear some resemblance, such as the Chechen or Korean deportations, but they paled in sheer numbers to what you are proposing. And massively inflating numbers and shifting goalposts with dubious sourcing is doing nothing to prove your case.
There was a reason the Exoduster movement was so widely opposed by those in power in the SouthEconomically you have reduced the labor force by 12%. Which may not seem like a problem during the Depression, but its the lowest cost labor and labor group with the least options. Good luck on getting other demographic groups to happily step into that labor niche.