Apparently, Kyoto was briefly on the list of potential targets for atomic bombing in Japan. What would be the ramifications if Kyoto were nuked instead of Hiroshima? Effects on Japanese morale, resolve to fight, Japanese culture post-war, etc.?
Kyoto had a far larger symbolic relevance than Nagasaki or Hiroshima.Probably the result would be the same
I don't see how bombing a different city could affect the general outcome of WW2 or the effects of the two nuclear bombings
Granted, the damage would be worse than Dresda but again i don't think it will have a long term impact on world society or the cold warKyoto had a far larger symbolic relevance than Nagasaki or Hiroshima.
I would find it very sad personally. All those works of art...
Kyoto was a city of massive cultural and historical importance to Japan. It'd be like if Rome were nuked. Not to mention, Kyoto had three times the population of Hiroshima- over a million people. Had it been flattened, the death tolls would undoubtedly be larger.Granted, the damage would be worse than Dresda but again i don't think it will have a long term impact on world society or the cold war
Doubtful, it was a combination of the bombs and the USSR's declaration/attack that broke the will to continue. The Japanese were more scared of what the Russians might do than the US ( fearing payback for 1905 ).Might Anami decide to fight on out of spite in light of this act of sacrilege?
Doubtful, it was a combination of the bombs and the USSR's declaration/attack that broke the will to continue. The Japanese were more scared of what the Russians might do than the US ( fearing payback for 1905 ).