I've never read Gibbon, it's possible my sources o information have.
I honestly am not surprised some people think that, the way I see the Theodosius Persecution and Massacres as being written it was like the Pagans were happy to have thousands of thousands of temples and shrines and worship sites Closed down. That just does not make sense. If you read into the avaliable accounts it shows that Theodosius had glhis work cut out supressing the religion across the empire. Their we're several Pagan politicians and generals that fought with their Chrisian counter-parts, but this was apart of a far wider period with Romans vs Goths, Urban vs Rural, etc etc so it's easy for historians of then and now to pave over what was the destruction of a people's way of life.
Boethius was also a late example of conversion to paganism from Christianity. I don't recall any serious attempts to repaganize the West. Christianity really completely overwhelmed paganism, there were a few pagan practices left behind in Christian culture , but I don't believe pagans ever mounted serious opposition, after Constantius, to Christianity, and the only time it could really be reversed, IMO, is with Constantine, who himself kept the title of Ponitifex Maximus.
I honestly am not surprised some people think that, the way I see the Theodosius Persecution and Massacres as being written it was like the Pagans were happy to have thousands of thousands of temples and shrines and worship sites Closed down. That just does not make sense. If you read into the avaliable accounts it shows that Theodosius had glhis work cut out supressing the religion across the empire. Their we're several Pagan politicians and generals that fought with their Chrisian counter-parts, but this was apart of a far wider period with Romans vs Goths, Urban vs Rural, etc etc so it's easy for historians of then and now to pave over what was the destruction of a people's way of life.
Last edited: