WI: Hearst as the Democratic nominee in 1904?

William Randolph Hearst is often remembered for helping to make the American newspaper industry what it would eventually become, for both good and ill. Often cited as the pioneer of what would become known as "yellow journalism" Hearst would forgoe the more factual headlines of men like Joseph Pulitzer and instead offered his readers lurid stories of crime, corruption and sex which allowed him to amass the largest newspaper and magazine business in the world.

But what many people may not know is that Mr Hearst had a brief stint as a politician being elected to the house in 1902 to represent New York's 11th district and being reelected in 1904. But if Hearst had his way he would have been running for a different office in the '04 election.

At the 1904 Democratic National Convention Hearst was nominated to be the party's candidate for President. Positioned on the left wing of the Progressive movement Hearst entered the Convention with the Illinois delegation already pledged to him several other states promising their support.

Though he was unsuccessful, the Convention nominated Alton B Parker on the first ballot after a shift, Hearst performed well, getting 200 votes in the original count placing him 2nd in a field of 12 nominees. For context the third highest vote share went to Missouri senator Francis Crockwell who got 42 votes.

But let's say that Hearst is able to synch the nomination, how does that affect the 1904 election? Who is Hearst's running mate & how does he fair against Teddy Roosevelt?
 
It was a Republican era, so Roosevelt still wins, but its a much more interesting and closer election than OTL. There is a good chance the Democrats nominate Hearst instead of Bryan in 1908, even if Hearst still loses the 1906 election for New York governor. I don't think Hearst either gets elected to any office other than Congress, or stays long in electoral politics, but he has a much more interesting bio. Some of the scenes in "Citizen Kane" change slightly.

OTL, Roosevelt defeated Parker with a nationwide popular popular vote margin of 18.6%. His nationwide popular vote plurality and margin set records that stood until the Harding landslide in 1920, and I think are still in the top ten, even after the big post World War I and post World War II landslides. That is hard to overcome, but in the preceding and subsequent election, Bryan lost by 5.3% against McKinley and 8.6% against Taft. Roosevelt is a much stronger candidate than even McKinley, but Hearst closer to Bryan than to Parker as a candidate.

Parker carried every state in the former Confederacy plus Kentucky, and nowhere else (the Wikipedia article shows Roosevelt winning Maryland by 51 votes but its electors voting for Parker, for reasons not listed in the article). However, Roosevelt carried every state he won by over 10% of the vote, except for Delaware (9.9%), Missouri (3.6%) and Maryland. So the Democrats don't really do much better than they did in the electoral college or congressional races.
 
Teddy was enormously popular but Hearst, rather than Bryan, probably becomes the North Star of the party and perhaps starts moving the urban working class closer to its New Deal posture earlier on
 
The conservative "reorganizers" had control of the national Demcoratic party by 1904 and they were not going to let another "radical" got nominated after the defeats of 1896 and 1900. What is worse is that Hearst didn't even have the support of all "progressive" Democrats, some suspicious of his great wealth and considering him an opportunist, others scandalized by his personal life. "Senator John Kern ( D - IN ) , who would become Bryan's running mate four years later , accused Hearst of trying to buy the presidential nomination . Bryan himself had warm words for Hearst , but he declined to endorse his candidacy." https://books.google.com/books?id=vslA7TGpgdwC&pg=PA138

1904 just doesn't look like Hearst's year. (If somehow he did win the nomination, TR would slaughter him--the combination of the "character issue",, a business community that would be mobilized for TR--they mostly supported him even against the colorless and rather conservative Parker!-- propserity, and TR's personal appeal would be overwhelming.)
 
Top