I've recently got round to watching BBC's Documentary about the early years of the Premier League, and was struck by how it is much it revolved around Manchester United's dominance in that era. This got me thinking about what English football might have looked like without Sir Alex Ferguson's influence over the club.
So say that he is fired in the 1989-90 season when fans were clamouring for him to go, and his replacement doesn't get them performing to the standards of OTL:
So say that he is fired in the 1989-90 season when fans were clamouring for him to go, and his replacement doesn't get them performing to the standards of OTL:
- Who replaces him?
- What teams stand to gain the most from a weaker Manchester United? Could the likes of Blackburn or Newcastle sustain their success over the longer term if they had more titles to their name?
- What happens to the 'Class of '92'? Would they be as good, and could Man U keep hold of them if they aren't consistent title challengers?
- What are the repercussions for the financial side of the game. Would transfer fees rise as quickly without other clubs chasing Man U? And would the likes of Chelsea and Man City get the kind of billionaire investment we saw IOTL?
- What happens to Ferguson himself? Does he go back to Scotland, or could he land another job in England?