When many people think of Classical Greece, they think of the two most well-known city-states, Athens and Sparta. And although for good reason, they were far from the only ones to gain a position of power, and it is very plausible that another one might have achieved the same position of power. In particular, Corinth IOTL was quite a wealthy and powerful player, having control over trade through the Isthmus, serving many important diplomatic roles, having several colonies such as Syracuse, Corcyra, and Epidamnus, and being the site for the Pan-Hellenic Congress in 481 BC and later the site where Philip II inaugurated his Corinthian League. Despite this, they never seemed to achieve the position in Greek politics their position dictated, being effectively surrounded by blocs of different and powerful cities. What if Corinth had achieved much more power and influence than IOTL, becoming a regional or even Pan-Hellenic power? The tyranny is never formed, and as a result of indeterminate butterflies, Sparta never manages to consolidate control over the Peloponnesian league, Argos is discredited more heavily for a time as a result of much more open collaboration with the Achaemenids, as opposed to the attempts made IOTL, and the Achaemenids devastate Athenian olive production and manage to attack the main citizen body of Athens before they can be evacuated, and Athens is much more devastated than OTL as a result of the second Achaemenid invasion. Would Corinth triumph and bring the whole Peloponessus to heel? Would they be able to attack Athens, or even achieve hegemony over all of Hellas? What would be the effect?
Last edited: