WI an even worse Disaster at Annual, 1921?

The Rif War is one of the more obscure conflicts of the 20th century, yet it was a pretty big deal. By its end, it had sucked in about a quarter of a million Spanish and French troops and helped launch the careers of Francisco Franco and most of the other major Nationalist figures of the Spanish Civil War. It undoubtedly also played a major role in the collapse of Spanish parliamentary democracy, the rise of Primo De Rivera, the eventual creation of the Second Republic and eventually, the Spanish Civil War.

Spain had always had an interest in Morocco, and towards the end of the 19th century Madrid began serious attempts to encroach into the hinterland from their bases in Ceuta and Melilla. In 1893 and 1909, the Spanish had tried to increase the size of the area under their control in the region; on both occasions, they got horribly over-confident, suffered dreadfully embarrassing defeats at the hands of the locals, and then eventually reversed them through bloody-mindedness and throwing conscripts at the enemy until the other side ran out of men. Finally, in 1911, the Agadir Crisis eventually led to Spain’s claims in the region being recognised. The Treaty of Fez (1912) allotted Spain the northern part of Morocco. The Rifan berbers felt otherwise, however, and if Spain wanted to control the region, she would have to conquer it.

While everyone else was occupied by the First World War, the Spanish began a campaign of expansion. Their first objective was to eliminate the brigand Raisuli. Raisuli, who today is remembered in Morocco as a weird mixture of Robin Hood and Sheriff of Nottingham, spent most of his time kidnapping Europeans and holding them to ransom for exorbitant amounts of money. His most famous exploit was the capture of a Greek playboy named Ion Perdicaris, which earnt him a walk-on part in the 1904 Presidential Election, and the rare accolade of having severely embarrassed Theodore Roosevelt. The Spanish campaign against Raisuli was a long one, and there was desultory fighting throughout the 1910s; one of these skirmishes, in 1916, saw Francisco Franco shot in the stomach while capturing a Rifan encampment, a feat that would see him promoted to Major. By 1920, the western part of Spanish Morocco had largely been pacified, and so the focus of Spanish efforts moved to the East. Sadly, in their attempts to finish off their old foe, the Spanish antagonised a new one.

In the spring of 1921, the Spanish launched a major pacification effort in the hills west of Melilla. The operation was marked by massive complacency on the part of the invaders; the RIfans simply melted into the countryside, and the Spanish simply assumed that the locals had lost the willingness to fight. By the summer, small, isolated Spanish garrisons were strung out across the region, with no clear supply lines or means of communication other than heliographs. By June, the Spanish advance had reached the Amekran River. Here, General Silvestre met representatives sent by Abd el-Krim, a former Qadi of Melilla and a journalist who had been imprisoned for penning anti-Spanish editorials. Krim warned Silvestre that crossing the river would be considered an act of war; the Spanish ignored the warning, and established an outpost on the far bank. A few days later, the camp was utterly destroyed by Rifan guerrillas. Then, in late July, a force of Rifan tribesmen led by Krim stormed Spanish positions around the village of Igueriben. Having captured this outpost, they turned their attention to the garrison at Annual, where General Silvestre had made his headquarters. There was a five-day siege before the Rifans overran this village too.

With the loss of Annual, the entire Spanish position in north-eastern Morocco completely collapsed. Outpost after outpost was surrounded and destroyed by the Rifans. A few Spanish troops under General Navarro managed to escape the unfolding catastrophe and retreated in good order to Monte Arruit, which they fortified; the Rifans surrounded this post too and eventually the defenders were forced to surrender. At a stroke, the gains made by Spain over a decade of fighting and at the cost of thousands of lives were wiped out. Troops rushed from the Spanish Sahara and the new Spanish Foreign Legion eventually managed to stabilise the situation, but it was one of the most humiliating defeats for a colonial power at the hands of the locals in history. It certainly makes Isandlwana or Little Big Horn look like a skirmish; when the dust settled, the Spanish had lost more than 13,000 troops, at the official count, and probably far more in reality. By contrast, the Rifans suffered only about a thousand casualties. The Rifans were able to capture huge quantities of rifles and artillery. Reaction in Spain was about as anguished as might be expected. Indalecio Prieto said that "We are at the most acute period of Spanish decadence. The campaign in Africa is a total failure, absolute, without extenuation, of the Spanish Army." King Alfonso caused outrage when he made various unwise remarks about the disaster. The humiliation, played a major role in the breakdown in relations between Cortes, Army and King, and contributed significantly to Primo de Rivera’s coup in 1923.

Asking what might have happened if Annual was somehow averted is an interest WI in itself, but I'm going to go the other way. Amazingly, the disaster could have been even worse. Spanish forces were so over-stretched in the region that the city of Melilla had been left completely undefended; now, with the destruction of the forces of Generals Silvestre and Navarro, there was absolutely nothing between the advancing Rifans and the port. As it was, it was only luck, and general confusion, that prevented Krim from taking Melilla. Remembering the bloody battle for the citadel of Melilla in 1893, the Rifans did not enter the city itself and instead occupied themselves looting; if they had advanced there would have met no resistance whatsoever, and could have occupied the main port in the eastern part of Spanish Morocco without a fight.

So, WI they do?

For a start, the whole strategic situation abruptly changes at a stroke. The Spanish have not only lost their most secure foothold in the region, but large amounts of supplies with it; the Rifans captured enough materiel IOTL, but ITTL they will have access to heavy artillery, motorised transport and even some of Spain’s war surplus Renault FT-17 tanks, along with the fuel to operate them (for a time, at least). They might also grab some aircraft too, although it may take some time for them to hire pilots. The Rifans will also reap an impressive dividend in men. IOTL a lot of the coastal tribes either stayed neutral or only provided covert aid to the Rifans; here, with the Spanish kicked out, it will be much more difficult for them to avoid joining the rebellion.

The affair is also, of course, an appalling, abject humiliation for Spain. Even OTL Annual caused a significant amount of national trauma; this will be even worse. The position of those on the Left who OTL called for a complete withdrawal from Morocco is considerably strengthened; all the more so when it becomes apparent that the reconquest of Melilla would, of course, only be the first stage of a very long and bloody campaign. Even if the Spanish flag was to fly above the city again in short order, the Rifans still control the countryside, and it is questionable whether Spain had the financial and psychological reserves necessary to accomplish this. The Monarchy is likely to be even more discredited than OTL, but wonder if the damage isn’t so severe that the King does the smart thing and desperately try and shift all the blame on to the Army. Certainly, the whitewash that was the “Expediente Picasso” report into the disaster won’t do; the public will want blood, and I expect Military heads would have to roll. Would the generals let this happen? Probably not, in which case we’re looking at coup two years early, and a military Junta ostensibly established to sort out the national crisis. If royal/military relations are poisonous though, then presumably any earlier coup would overthrow the monarchy as well as the Cortes. That might or might not provide a broader basis for the restoration of parliamentary government later on. I’m not au fait enough with the period to guess as to whether Primo de Rivera still ends up on top in this scenario; any ideas?

So that’s the impact on Spain, what about Morocco?

If the Spanish want to retake Melilla, they will have to capture it from the sea. This is certainly possible; the Spanish fleet would be able to provide covering fire, and the Foreign Legion could conduct landings. Any operation would be very bloody, however; and instead of being the first man in to relieve the city as OTL, Francisco Franco will be the first man on the beaches and very likely to go on to do something stupidly heroic (and fatal). There would also be the widespread use of gas. OTL the Annual disaster provoked this; in August 1921 the Spanish Minister for War authorised its use “with joy”, and promptly ordered a large quantity of mustard gas from Germany to replace Spain’s stock of Phosgene.

Probably the most likely scenario in this case would be a major Spanish operation to retake Melilla, which is probably a pyrrhic victory because of massive casualties and the complete destruction of the town. The Spanish would have to wait quite some time, perhaps years rather than months, to regain their strength for the reconquest of the hinterland; and this would potentially give the Rif Republic time to put down some real roots. However, it’s worth wondering if the Spanish would try all this alone. It would be deeply humiliating to ask for French help, but you could argue the French did much of the heavy lifting IOTL , and Paris certainly has no desire to see an independent Rif Republic, for fear of their own Moroccan subjects getting ideas. If this is the case and the French go all out, then the Rif is screwed; I could imagine the war dragging on to much the same conclusion in 1925-6 as it did IOTL, only with more casualties on all sides and a much weaker Spain into the bargain. If the French only lend minimal support (and the Rifans are too busy in the north to try the same tactics on the French in the south, which OTL was the catalyst for Paris’ intervention), then I could imagine that a stalemate might eventually develop by the mid-20s; the Spanish control Melilla, its immediate hinterland and the modern Tangier-Tetuoan Region, while the Rifans have the rest.

Would the Spanish continue their war? They might, in which case Morocco ends up being a running sore for even longer. I wonder though, by this point, if some sort of deal might be done, officially or otherwise, whereby the Rifans recognise Spanish sovereignty but are left to their own business. I’m not sure of the long-term impacts of this- presumably for a start, it makes staging any military coup attempt out of Spanish Morocco as OTL practically impossible, and means that the Rifans are a power of their own should anything come to civil war; the “declare Moroccan independence” card that was briefly considered by some in the Republic IOTL suddenly becomes a hell of a lot more interesting, especially as it could well lead to French intervention on the other side…
 

Thande

Donor
Nice summary Ed.

Is there any chance that this could be blown up into an example of successful anti-colonial resistance elsewhere, particularly in the Muslim world? Especially if the Rifans manage to eject the Spanish from Morocco altogether (it would need a bit more than your scenario I suspect - maybe if the SCW starts earlier over finger-pointing about the war and the left is angry about sending conscripts to die). Could see Raisuli or Krim as a memetic Che Guevara figure of anti-colonial resistance.
 
Is there any chance that this could be blown up into an example of successful anti-colonial resistance elsewhere, particularly in the Muslim world? Especially if the Rifans manage to eject the Spanish from Morocco altogether (it would need a bit more than your scenario I suspect - maybe if the SCW starts earlier over finger-pointing about the war and the left is angry about sending conscripts to die). Could see Raisuli or Krim as a memetic Che Guevara figure of anti-colonial resistance.

Abd-el-Krim *was* an anti-colonial icon IOTL, so there's a chance that he could grow in stature to Che Guevara levels.
the “declare Moroccan independence” card that was briefly considered by some in the Republic
Actually, to Abd-El-Krim, moroccans were his enemies almost as much as the french and spanish. He wanted a independent Rif Republic, and could care less about the rest of Morocco. After Moroccan independence he elected to live in exile in Egypt because he did not want to recognize Moroccan overlordship over his territory, and inspired several riffian revolts against Rabat during the 60's that were brutally suppressed.

I am not sure if the loss of Melilla would give strength to the anti-war party. The Protectorate is one thing, but Melilla had been a part of Spain for more than four centuries and (IIRC) was considered a part of Andalucia. There would be a huge outcry to take Melilla back. The chances of the army taking over before it did in 1923 are huge. A fascinating after effect of this is if this could have led Spain through the fascist route in the 20's -IOTL Primo de Rivera tried in 1927; but he was too much of a conservative and overall nice guy to really try to implement fascism. I don't think this could be enough to spark a Civil War since IOTL Primo de Rivera's regime enjoyed widespread support for the first years, and the social tensions worsened by the Great Depression that led to the Civil War in 1936 were not yet as acute in the 20's, which were a time of great expansion for the spanish economy.

Btw, just so you can see the scale of the disaster, Annual is, by number of losses, the worst defeat ever had by a spanish army; much worse than any battle in the imperial era or the Napoleonic Wars. It was an amazing display of utter incompetence at every possible level -political, strategical and operational- , sending badly trained peasant conscripts led by extremely incompetent and corrupt officers against very well trained and motivated mountain warriors led by one of the 20th century's most overlooked badass; all with a strategic plan that made no sense whatsoever and whose flaws were painfully obvious. It was a catastrophe waiting to happen -and it happened, brutally.
 
Fascinating. In a different context the war would have had dranatic global effects.

I suspect it was only that a World War occurred in the same rough period and yet failed to overlap with the conflict. Without such a war it'd be a more influential event, but it might've been more even than that: Had a general war occurred earlier or similar events happened in during World War 1 (when French intervention would have been necessarily absent) it might have become a part of the story in a similar mold to von Lettow-Vorbeck.
 
Abd-el-Krim *was* an anti-colonial icon IOTL, so there's a chance that he could grow in stature to Che Guevara levels.

I was going to mention that. Wasn't Ho Chi Minh rather inspired by him? I'm pretty sure Mao was influenced as well.


A fascinating after effect of this is if this could have led Spain through the fascist route in the 20's -IOTL Primo de Rivera tried in 1927; but he was too much of a conservative and overall nice guy to really try to implement fascism. I don't think this could be enough to spark a Civil War since IOTL Primo de Rivera's regime enjoyed widespread support for the first years, and the social tensions worsened by the Great Depression that led to the Civil War in 1936 were not yet as acute in the 20's, which were a time of great expansion for the spanish economy.

That would be interesting- does bringing everything forward by two years give us another candidate for the top job? Of course, it would be interesting if Primo de Rivera jnr could somehow worm his way in, but I guess he's too young...


Had a general war occurred earlier or similar events happened in during World War 1 (when French intervention would have been necessarily absent) it might have become a part of the story in a similar mold to von Lettow-Vorbeck.

That's a good point- not sure how you could bump up Spanish operations in such a way as to do that though. Still, it's probably the best bet of getting a Rif Republic, and that would be rather fun.
 
I was going to mention that. Wasn't Ho Chi Minh rather inspired by him? I'm pretty sure Mao was influenced as well.

Yes, Ho claimed Abd-el Krim as his main influence.


That would be interesting- does bringing everything forward by two years give us another candidate for the top job? Of course, it would be interesting if Primo de Rivera jnr could somehow worm his way in, but I guess he's too young...

It's not like there was a shortage of overambitious officers in Spain at the era, but Primo de Rivera had the advantage of not having fought in Morocco and hence not being tainted by the Annual fuckup. Plus, he tried to legitimize himself by claiming his regime was only temporary. In 1927 he set up a puppet Assembly that in 1929 had drafted a new, vaguely fascist constitution that among other innovations gave women the vote; but it was swept away by his exile in January 1930 and the proclamation of the Republic in 1931. One wonders what he or someone else could have done with two extra years, or with the extra popularity that taking Melilla back could have given him. Ironically, being the leader of a military Junta, Primo de Rivera always had more support among the general populace than among the military. His switch from a military to a civilian cabinet in 1925 is seen as the beginning of the end for him; and when it was clear that he had lost all support from the army, his demise was swift. Maybe revamping the spanish military and leading it into a more decisive victory would butterfly this away.

Primo de Rivera Jr. was born in 1900, so he's a little too young to interest us here.
 
Top