Who would've taken hold of China in the crisis of the 10th century, had it simply collapsed?

Who had a shot of taking the Mandate of Heaven and the interest to do so?

  • Great Liao

    Votes: 19 90.5%
  • Goryeo themselves

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Qocho Kingdom

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • A Tibetan warlord

    Votes: 3 14.3%
  • A Korean-backed warlord

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • A Chola-backed warlord

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Someone else (comment)

    Votes: 2 9.5%

  • Total voters
    21
In the 10th century, with the fall of the Tang dynasty, a phase of huge political instability swept the nation at a time when many of its neighbours were - on the contrary - experiencing a period of cultural unity and political power; the Mongols (under Great Liao) and Korea both unified under powerful polities, Japan was in its Heian period, the Uyghur Kingdom of Qocho was thriving and the Chola dynasty was a few decades short of its largest extent. To accompany this, in the west, a powerful figure could've risen up from Tibet or Annam as well.
Now in our timeline, China eventually regained stability under the Song dynasty. But if that hadn't happened, who among the aforementioned factions could've taken advantage of the political disunity and established their own powerful dynasty in China?


Historically the Great Liao came closest, with the Later Tang dynasty managing to almost accomplish Chinese national unity; Goryeo and Chola, while unlikely to take on the mantle directly, - for different reasons - could've easily supported a warlord to push their interests in the region. Leaders from Qocho or Tibet are also possible candidates for taking the throne themselves.
 
The Khitans did have a shot iotl when they captured Kaifeng and took out Later Jin. They were chased out however when various warlords formed a coalition against them , with their emperor also dying conveniently when he was leading the campaign in person.
 
Last edited:
Top