Actually, here's an important question: When you say Latin christianity, are we talking about simply the Latin Rite, or full Papal authority? You could certainly see Latin Rite churches that are not under Papl jurisdiction in certain scenarios.
Dominus Novus, sorry about not providing a clear answer to your question so far in this thread or the parallel one. I was not trying to evade the question but since you're asking for precision I needed to take a little time to think about it.
In my definition, to qualify as Latin Christianity or Roman Catholicism the churches need to meet these conditions, 1) Papal Supremacy (at least where there is no schism dividing the west) 2) the Latin rite 3) Latin Liturgy and the Vulgate, 4) western rules on priestly celibacy and monastic practices.
So, any deviation on points 2, 3 or 4 (use of the eastern rite, use if Greek or Church Slavonic liturgy or non-imposition of priestly celibacy) would render a church Greek Orthodox or Eastern Orthodox in my categorization, even if down the road there is some kind intercommunion deal with or allegiance to the western Pope.
In OTL it seemed to me both sides were firm on matters relating to the eastern/western schism through the first half of the medieval period, but then the Papacy became more open to intercommunion or accepting ecclesiastical allegiance from some churches despite their following eastern or oriental/monophysite rites from the later Crusades era onward (with churches in Greece, Ukraine, Lebanon and Armenia for example).
That easier for you to follow D N ?
If that definition changes your answers, which ones does it change?
Kerney - yes
Were all the baltic countries under Balts? Because if not, my top choice is not included.
Yes, you top choice was Lithuanians, then definitely Balts.
In my mind I was thinking of categorizing the Estonians as either Balts or Finns. If they were your favorite, which voting button did you pick for them?