What if Henry the Lion was victorious?

Henry the Lion was one of the most influential rulers of the HRE in the high middle ages. He was duke of Saxony and Bavaria. However, all his efforts of centralizing his rule over Saxony trying to make it more like England of his father in law made him quite a few enemies and he was bailed out lots of times by Frederick. So when he didn't heed Fredericks call for help and wanted Goslar back (which he got in 1154 and lost in 1169), he sealed his fate by biting the one hand that protected him from his enemies leading to the Balkanization of Saxony. But what if it had come differently?

The Saxon war in 1167-1170 was a direct response of North German princes against the expansionism and centralizing efforts of Henry the Lion. The coalition consisted of the Archbishop of Magdeburg, the Archbishop of Cologne, the bishop of Hildesheim, Louis of Thuringia, Albert the Bear and his sons, Otto of Meissen, the dukes of Assel, Christian of Oldenburg. Only Pribislaw of Mecklenburg and the duke of Schwerin supported Henry as both of them were invested by him. Despite being battered heavily Henry came out of this relatively unscathed thanks to Frederick protecting him. But what if Henry was more successful and broke the coalition for instance by killing and/or capturing Albert the Bear and his sons? This loss wouldn't wipe out the Ascanians as Albert did make quite a few sons but it would seriously weaken teir position. Could Henry make the remaining Ascanians give up Brandenburg which was still in its infancy at this point and give them Bavaria his claims to instead? IOTL Henry focused on Saxony because he had few territories in Bavaria and the opportunities for expansion were far greater since he split off the Austrian part thus denying eastward expansion. Given that Frederick let Henry get off scott free despite strong protests of the coalition that beat Henry, I'd stay chances are Frederick would support a victorious Henry too. The fact that Frederick also married Henry to Matilda of England further proves their close alliance.

Lets best to look at why Henry fell from grace in the first place and what led to it. Henry had ambitions of centralizing/unifying Saxony under his rule and making the Duke of Saxony as a step between the Saxon princes and the Emperor. He did so by acquiring land and stripping the nobility and the clergy of rights and privileges. By doing this he made himself a lot of enemies both within Saxony and outside. Frederick Barbarossa was the protector of Henry even when Henry lost against the coalition of north German princes. Once Henrys uncle Welf IV as well as his sons died of dyphteria in the Italian campaign in 1167, Frederick Barbarossa inherited among many other estates the estates of Henrys uncle. Henry had a inheritance treaty with his uncle but refused to pay, which Frederick gladly replaced him. As a condition to aid Barbarossa, Henry wanted Goslar probably because he wanted to use its rich silver mines to pay for his centralizing efforts. However, with Henry the Lion having won the Saxon war, he would have destroyed his opponents and likely even gain a lot of land (maybe even Brandenburg). Henry would not have a reason to not come to Frederick Barbarossas aid. His enemies the Archbishops of Cologne and Magdeburg would not be able to seize the opportunity and cozy themselves up to Frederick.
625px-Hzgt_Sachsen_1181.png

the Duchy of Saxony (yellow) and Henrys allodial land (orange)
 
Henry winning against the coalition would result in there being no one to stand up to him in Saxony, making him more or less the undisputed ruler of North Germany. As you can see on the map, Mecklenburg was already under his authority and he would only keep expanding East. He would eventually run into troubles with Denmark, Poland and Bohemia. And with him continuing his centralization efforts, his descendents would be the in a prime postion for becoming Emperors.

If Henry was able to capture Otto of Meissen too, could he force Meissen under the Duchy of Saxony too? And if so, could he enforce the Constitutio de regalibus in Saxony thus making the Meissens renege their regalia to the silver deposits at Freiberg thereby securing themselves financial leeway for greater aspirations?

IOTL Theodoric of Lusatia challanged Henry to a duel. Could Henry the Lion have gained Lusatia or at least make it a fief of Saxony if he won that duel? Henry might have been 6 years his senior but unlike Theodoric, Henry had spent his life waging war so I'd be surprised if he didn't pick up any skills.

If Saxony unifies and the Welfs do not become Emperors, is there a chance that Saxony will leave the HRE? Most of the Hanseatic League would be part of Saxony, so I think its safe to say that Saxony would be focused on overseas trade. Would the focus on trade result in Saxony expanding west to bring the entirety of the HREs coastline under their rule?

1094px-Ausbreitung_der_Hanse_um_das_Jahr_1400-Droysens_28.jpg
 
Henry the Lion was one of the most influential rulers of the HRE in the high middle ages. He was duke of Saxony and Bavaria. However, all his efforts of centralizing his rule over Saxony trying to make it more like England of his father in law made him quite a few enemies and he was bailed out lots of times by Frederick. So when he didn't heed Fredericks call for help and wanted Goslar back (which he got in 1154 and lost in 1169), he sealed his fate by biting the one hand that protected him from his enemies leading to the Balkanization of Saxony. But what if it had come differently?

The Saxon war in 1167-1170 was a direct response of North German princes against the expansionism and centralizing efforts of Henry the Lion. The coalition consisted of the Archbishop of Magdeburg, the Archbishop of Cologne, the bishop of Hildesheim, Louis of Thuringia, Albert the Bear and his sons, Otto of Meissen, the dukes of Assel, Christian of Oldenburg. Only Pribislaw of Mecklenburg and the duke of Schwerin supported Henry as both of them were invested by him. Despite being battered heavily Henry came out of this relatively unscathed thanks to Frederick protecting him. But what if Henry was more successful and broke the coalition for instance by killing and/or capturing Albert the Bear and his sons? This loss wouldn't wipe out the Ascanians as Albert did make quite a few sons but it would seriously weaken teir position. Could Henry make the remaining Ascanians give up Brandenburg which was still in its infancy at this point and give them Bavaria his claims to instead? IOTL Henry focused on Saxony because he had few territories in Bavaria and the opportunities for expansion were far greater since he split off the Austrian part thus denying eastward expansion. Given that Frederick let Henry get off scott free despite strong protests of the coalition that beat Henry, I'd stay chances are Frederick would support a victorious Henry too. The fact that Frederick also married Henry to Matilda of England further proves their close alliance.

Lets best to look at why Henry fell from grace in the first place and what led to it. Henry had ambitions of centralizing/unifying Saxony under his rule and making the Duke of Saxony as a step between the Saxon princes and the Emperor. He did so by acquiring land and stripping the nobility and the clergy of rights and privileges. By doing this he made himself a lot of enemies both within Saxony and outside. Frederick Barbarossa was the protector of Henry even when Henry lost against the coalition of north German princes. Once Henrys uncle Welf IV as well as his sons died of dyphteria in the Italian campaign in 1167, Frederick Barbarossa inherited among many other estates the estates of Henrys uncle. Henry had a inheritance treaty with his uncle but refused to pay, which Frederick gladly replaced him. As a condition to aid Barbarossa, Henry wanted Goslar probably because he wanted to use its rich silver mines to pay for his centralizing efforts. However, with Henry the Lion having won the Saxon war, he would have destroyed his opponents and likely even gain a lot of land (maybe even Brandenburg). Henry would not have a reason to not come to Frederick Barbarossas aid. His enemies the Archbishops of Cologne and Magdeburg would not be able to seize the opportunity and cozy themselves up to Frederick.
View attachment 902223
the Duchy of Saxony (yellow) and Henrys allodial land (orange)


Henry winning against the coalition would result in there being no one to stand up to him in Saxony, making him more or less the undisputed ruler of North Germany. As you can see on the map, Mecklenburg was already under his authority and he would only keep expanding East. He would eventually run into troubles with Denmark, Poland and Bohemia. And with him continuing his centralization efforts, his descendents would be the in a prime postion for becoming Emperors.

If Henry was able to capture Otto of Meissen too, could he force Meissen under the Duchy of Saxony too? And if so, could he enforce the Constitutio de regalibus in Saxony thus making the Meissens renege their regalia to the silver deposits at Freiberg thereby securing themselves financial leeway for greater aspirations?

IOTL Theodoric of Lusatia challanged Henry to a duel. Could Henry the Lion have gained Lusatia or at least make it a fief of Saxony if he won that duel? Henry might have been 6 years his senior but unlike Theodoric, Henry had spent his life waging war so I'd be surprised if he didn't pick up any skills.

If Saxony unifies and the Welfs do not become Emperors, is there a chance that Saxony will leave the HRE? Most of the Hanseatic League would be part of Saxony, so I think its safe to say that Saxony would be focused on overseas trade. Would the focus on trade result in Saxony expanding west to bring the entirety of the HREs coastline under their rule?

View attachment 903294


Now unfortunately I don't know much about the situation in which Henry the Lion found himself in the Saxon regions, to try to conceive a situation in which unlike Otl he is not considered too dangerous by the other princes who convince Frederick to punish him definitively with the imperial ban, certainly I can imagine that if he manages to capture both Albert the Bear and Otto of Meissen at the same time, he can, thanks to imperial support, reduce them to simple vassals ( with naturally following a slight subtraction of their territories in his favor ) but as regards the situation of the two archbishops of Magdeburg and above all Cologne ( who is one of the main princes of the empire, as well as one of the "Electors" (1) I see it as very complex, also because it would cause the Papacy to intervene in the conflict, complicating the situation worse than Otl , but now I can easily say that if Henry did not end up at loggerheads with his cousin, it would cause a notable change for the development of the Empire, given that Frederick could count on Saxon troops in the subsequent Italian campaigns ( in reality we know that Frederick wanted intervene again in the peninsula in the same years in which he was busy with the dispute caused by the wars of Saxony ) this previous intervention in Italy could have avoided the birth of the 1st Lombard League and the subsequent war between Frederick and the Italian municipalities ( Milan first and foremost ( 2 ) furthermore there is the problem that sooner or later Henry and his successors may demonstrate that they have clear imperial ambitions, which will put them at odds with the Staufen, especially since the two dynasties alone would hold half of the Reich ( furthermore we know that Henry wanted take possession of all the possessions of Welf VI, including the Italian ones ( the margrave of Tuscany and the duchy of Spoleto ) which in Otl ended up confiscated by Frederick, to strengthen his position in Italy, decision that did not please Henry




1) which in this period meant holding prestigious institutional positions ( for the clergy ) or having a large personal estate for the princes ( see the Babenbergs )


2) even if it must be said that after Barbarossa's third Italian expedition, direct imperial power in the region was actually at its historical peak, with Italian cities paying taxes and operating within the imperial legislature ( in compliance with " Constitutio de regalibus " ) , but at the same time discontent grew, both due to a joint propaganda campaign by Milan and the Papacy, but also because the men of the central administration chosen by Frederick were almost all of German origin, facilitating the formation of a feeling of xenophobia in the locals, which also spread in previously pro-imperial municipalities ( such as Cremona ) although technically speaking Frederick in the agreements deriving from the Peace of Constance in 1183, despite having to recognize the autonomy of the Italian municipalities, obtained in exchange an annual payment which amounted to 1/3 of the total revenue of the imperial treasury, with Goslar filling another 1/3
 
Last edited:
Top