well, Spain mightNot happening, half the world's on fire and no one has the time for frivolities like an athletics competition.
Not happening, half the world's on fire and no one has the time for frivolities like an athletics competition.
Why does the Baseball "World" Series come to mind?
There would probably have been a relatively small Olympics dominated by athletes from the Americas. I'm not sure if it would have been feasible for athletes from neutral countries in Europe to get across the Atlantic, but the United Kingdom/Canada might have sent a token delegation as part of their charm offensive to get the US into the war, and of course Japan was still neutral at this point as far as the conflict in Europe went. Regardless, whatever US city gets the Olympics isn't going to want to cancel, even if the international situation means it isn't as big an event as they were hoping for.
Oh, you mean the contest where the best baseball players from Cuba, Mexico, Venezuela, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, the Spanish Caribbean, Francophonic and Anglophonic North America play in the world's top league to determine who the best collection of players from or who have nationalities in said countries are?
You mean like UEFA?Oh, you mean the contest where the best baseball players from Cuba, Mexico, Venezuela, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, the Spanish Caribbean, Francophonic and Anglophonic North America play in the world's top league to determine who the best collection of players from or who have nationalities in said countries are?
You mean like UEFA?
That every non-US sport has some kind of World Cup in addition to elite multi national Leagues suggests there is still space in sport for some good old nationalism.
Los Angeles hosted the 1932 Olympics, so it is unlikely the US would win a bid only 8 years later in 1940.
Okay, what about 1940 Winter Olympics? You can have those in the same country fairly close - US 1980 (Winter) and 1984 (Summer) and US 1996 (Summer) and 2002 (Winter).