food. fuel. armaments.Because Salazar had supported Franco in the Spanish Civil War, Portugal would probably stay neutral (and make some profit if it could). Also what would you embargo? In my knowledge there wasn't much Portugal sold to Spain.
food. fuel. armaments.Because Salazar had supported Franco in the Spanish Civil War, Portugal would probably stay neutral (and make some profit if it could). Also what would you embargo? In my knowledge there wasn't much Portugal sold to Spain.
The Joint Estimate of the Situation in War Plan Red did state that Japan being allied with Britain against the US would be a possibility if Britain decided to go to war against the US.Japan had already divorced the Brits, far back in the 1920s. By this OP dates Japan was more dependent on US banks and general business than on its traditional ties to Britain. To retain Japan as a British client state you have to reach back to pre 1920s and reduce political and economic tensions, like Japans Twenty One Demands on China, As the Great War ran out many Japanese leaders felt they needed to end their client state relationship with Britain and take a independent course. Which they made a effective effort to do so post 1918 or earlier.
So far as known RED at the present time has no military alliances or agreements with any other strong powers that would be of importance in a war with BLUE. As it has never been the policy of RED to enter into any major war without allies or associates, it is probable that RED will endeavor to gain such allies before engaging in a war with BLUE. On account of the many purely continental questions with which the European Powers are mainly concerned, and the opposing, and frequently hostile, groups into which these Powers are arrayed, it is unlikely that RED will be able to obtain a strong European ally which will initially be of much service to her in a war with BLUE. The most probable ally of RED is ORANGE. It would not be difficult for RED to induce ORANGE to enter the war against BLUE in view of the apparent advantages which ORANGE would gain if the war were successful in eliminating BLUE as an important political and commercial factor in the Far East. The most apparent reason that would deter RED from concluding such alliance would be the opposition on the part of the SCARLET Dominions to further ORANGE aggrandizement. The eventual intervention of ORANGE in the war on the side of RED is, however, always to be regarded as a possibility.
EasternRomanEmpire said:
Because Salazar had supported Franco in the Spanish Civil War, Portugal would probably stay neutral (and make some profit if it could). Also what would you embargo? In my knowledge there wasn't much Portugal sold to Spain.
food. fuel. armaments.
Fair points but AIUI the ending of the Anglo-Japanese Treaty was due to US demands at the Washington Naval Conference. So it’s not impossible that a different end to WW1 might see the alliance continued. With the US a locking trade with Japan but Britain and its Empire still open to it.
Thats correct, but it cost years in building momentum.The NSDAP got popular in 1932 and won in 1933, the putsch was completely forgotten by everyone.
Nazi Party election results - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Before 1929 his party won't be very popular as the economy is doing fine and he needs a little bit of time to become the n.1 party in Germany.That's correct, but it cost years in building momentum.
Not only the time in jail, but also the later ban on public speaking.
food. fuel. armaments.
At the time Portugal was very agrarian, it didn't have any particular resources and the industry wasn't very developed; it doesn't have much to sell to Spain but that would help Portugal because otherwise the Brits will consider Portugal an enemy.I'm curious what Portugal's trade in those with Spain might actually have been. I don't know much about Portugal's grain or meat production, its fuel production, or tis arms industry.
One wildly improbable scenario might be the USA versus Japan and the British Empire. With maybe a Fascist France allied to the US and Italy with the British. Germany? Neutral perhaps?
Vatican City isn't a big fan of ultra-nationalists, Portugal would certainly have strong ties with the Latin Bloc but I don't see Salazar wanting to wage war.a French civil war prompted by and simultaneous to the Spanish Civil War. there could be a resulting French State an authoritarian regime, and a Latin Bloc of Italy, France, Spain, and possibly Vatican City and Portugal.
Why would Germany support Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey? Hitler wouldn't see a point in doing that.Germany could grab Austria during the chaos, support their trading partners Yugoslavia, Greece, and Turkey against Italy and its Latin Bloc partners? a 1937 Italian invasion of Yugoslavia?
Germany could grab Austria during the chaos, support their trading partners Yugoslavia, Greece, and Turkey against Italy and its Latin Bloc partners? a 1937 Italian invasion of Yugoslavia?
Why would Germany support Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey? Hitler wouldn't see a point in doing that.
Italy wouldn't invade Yugoslavia, Mussolini wouldn't do this with the much more important French Civil War going on, also the Italians would certainly fail if they tried.
Well during the French Civil War Mussolini is probably busy supporting the Nationalists, after the war I cannot predict what Mussolini would do but my guess is that he doesn't attack Yugoslaviaif Germany were the odd man out regarding any Latin Bloc, and Italy had a working relationship with an authoritarian regime in France (which we should remember is not likely to be pro-German), the Nazi regime might ally with the Italian target countries, Yugoslavia, Greece, and Turkey.
an invasion of Yugoslavia was the military objective Italy had the most detailed planning for, while I agree with your assessment of the outcome the Italian view at the time would almost certainly be different.