I was really glad when I got to "rejected" in Halberd. Holy shit.
Anyway, is it really that steep a price to pay? From what I can see the only thing the UK and Portugal are losing are Macau and Hong Kong; everything else is coming from the supposed losers. I suppose they might count the loss of SE Asia in their sphere of influence as a price they pay.
Also,
methinks this means bio/chem weapons are indeed to follow.
It does remove all foreign influence from China proper. Both countries lose a base in China, which hurts Portugal a lot more than Britain. A friendly China that has the east and south buffered would look north and west toward Russia, which would push them farther into the Commonwealth's camp.
I do note Burma does not fall into China's influence, though.
This might wake Portugal up, though, and actually have them work harder at keeping their colonies. East Timor suddenly becomes that much more vital. I wonder if they'll manage to integrate the half of the island or their African colonies. No matter who wins in India, I think Portugal loses Goa.
Hrm. What would happen to Japanese Malay Peninsula if it is lost? Returned to Siam/added to Malaya/split along ethnic lines?
I mean what did they think China would ask for first from the UK and Portugal? I mean their recognized hegemony in East Asia is there to sweeten the pot since China has them by the balls, but of course they're going to want China Proper back.
Allow me to clarify. Hainan and Formosa are givens. Giving up Hong Kong and Macau no doubt hurts, although this is offset somewhat because both cities are heavily damaged by bombing. The "steep price" to pay is that the Cape Town Conference basically grants Chinese dominance over Southeast Asia and Korea. Remember that the world is still skeptical of China due to its Technocratic government.