How did those two got along personally in OTL really? Most things I know make it seem like Hannibal thought of Antiochus as a pompous fool, but since that mostly coming from Roman sources I don't put much faith in it. Antiochus accomplished too much to be an utter tool.
Perhaps you've got some better sources?
Don't assume that I know what I'm talking about! Seriously, I have very little formal training in Roman history, let alone Punic history (I've read a few books but no classes really to speak of); I am extremely fallible, I appreciate having my statements questioned so that I can parce out my logic, double-check my sources, and see if I make any sense.
The logic behind me saying that is that it seems like Antiochus and Hannibal had a good relationship
before the Roman-Syrian War broke out. Goldsworthy mentions that Hannibal's political enemies went to Rome claiming that he had been intriguing with Antiochus III to attack Rome again. While this may or may not be true, and the same circumstances wouldn't apply, it does seem to suggest that Hannibal was willing to work with Antiochus without it being just the last resort of an exile. Also, the biography I have on Antiochus the Great (by Michael Taylor) describes Hannibal as a "well-regarded councilor" in the Seleucid court, especially before the war.
I think where Hannibal and Antiochus had their "falling out" was over how Antiochus handled the war against Rome. Hannibal wanted to command an army and to invade Italy, but Antiochus trusted his own generals more, and (probably wisely) didn't want to send his armies all the way to Italy. They had different visions for the war, and both men would have had egos with histories of success to back it up -- in the situation that OTL pit them in, it's easy to see where the two might clash.
So I guess the way I was thinking about it was that the relationship between Hannibal and Antiochus wouldn't have the same chance to deteriorate ITTL. Presumably, they saw common ground between themselves and had a mutual respect for one another, otherwise there probably wouldn't be a relationship to discuss. In this situation, with the two men rulers of empires that aren't competing over the same turf, my assumption is that they would continue to get along well enough.
I should point out though, that things COULD theoretically change their calculations towards one another. I'm only commenting on what we know right now. That's not to say that something WILL happen, I just want to leave it open.
Anyways, thanks for your comment. As I said above, I really do appreciate people calling me out and making me really think about what I say. It helps me.
lokaloki said:
Thanks for updates!
I am glad that TL is continued
Thank you for commenting.