With the heads of their kings placed on pikes at the english channel, to tell the limeys what awaits them. Blood for the jacobin god.
From the opening, it sounds like this revolution might actually be successful instead of lapsing back into monarchy like OTL.
Personally if France is able to maintain a pretty Rhine border it's all worth it.
Looking forward to more. What are the dynamics between the different strands of republicanism? Are they are extreme in variation? More solidarity? Less divergence of opinion?
And French Piedmont. Don't forget Piedmont.
1807 borders best borders
And an europe full of republics beyond them With the heads of their kings placed on pikes at the english channel, to tell the limeys what awaits them. Blood for the jacobin god.
No Napoleon and a republican France. Its interesting.
Aux armes, citoyens,
Formez vos bataillons,
Marchons, marchons !
Qu'un sang impur
Abreuve nos sillons !
Is monarchiens a name chosen on purpose? It sound like you attached monar to the french name for dog. They would probably call themselve Monarchistes.
They called themselves that to differenciate with the monarchistes who were absolutist.They're synonyms. By the way, most of the update (all of it before Napoleon's death) is OTL and before the Feuillant faction was organized, they called themselves the more general monarchiens. Don't ask me why, but that's the term they called themselves.
They called themselves that to differenciate with the monarchistes who were absolutist.
I like it. I was just thinking there was a dearth of good Revolutionary France timelines. Subscribed!
I think you should be really hardcore for making a TL where the main POD is of a upsetting simplicity: "No Napoleon."
Said that, please proceed.
What is great is that around that time France did not lack in military talent.
But I am not sure federalism will take off. Many would think federalism is the weakening of the state. And there is nothing wrong with centralized state.
Napoleon wanted to be accepted by the others "monarch" that is why he didn't destroy Prussia or carve up Austria when he could. Here the French republic if the revolutionary fervor do not die down and they manage to beat Prussia and Austria they will create sister republics on the corpse of their king.
Only Napoleon had that kind of eternal expansionist ideal. Everyone else sought for peace, albeit with strong French gains. France ITTL will never be able to defeat Prussia and Austria like IOTL because it has no desire to do so.
No the revolutionnary republic wanted to export it by force. And there is no way the others ancien regime would want peace with France whose very existence might give revolutionnary idea to their peoples. I would say that this France might be even more expansionist.
They negotiated to buy time for the next round. Here without marriage Austria has even less reason to want peace.While the revolutionary republic sought to export the Revolution by force and the other European monarchies sought to destroy France, even IOTL many monarchies sought for peace and France accepted. Of course, France broke this peace leading to another "War of the ____ Coalition", but France and European monarchies most certainly negotiated IOTL.
They negotiated to buy time for the next round. Here without marriage Austria has even less reason to want peace.