I would love to see a grand sudden victory, where Rome runs out of its great generals (that even IOTL were surprisingly prevalent), and Phyrrus storms up the west coast.
Sadly, whilst Rome did have experience fighting with and against hoplite formations (see the Kingdom of Rome), the terrain of Italy and the way the various hill tribes fought makes big pitched battles on a giant field rare. Those were the battles most Greek armies excelled at. That and in narrow passes. I'm surprised by the victories so far, as a better Roman strategy would be to try and cause ambushes and fight on uneven terrain - but I do hope that with their repulsion of Phyrrus they'll overpush and get wrecked.
I would like to provide some defense of Sersor though, whilst Greek armies were Hoplite/Phalangite based, even with the mixed arms, Hannibal had a large number of Celtiberians in his armies, who introduced the particular swords and throwing spears the Romans are envisioned with, which might provide some idea as to why Phyrrus isn't doing so well. - But give him a larger number of Samnite troops, an overconfident Consul could fight on broken ground, where Phyrrus would be (in theory) at a disadvantage, only for a huge Samnite mercenary force to crash into the Roman rear - and opening the way to Rome, with Roman surrender of Magna Grecia, and either Independence for the Samnites, or a King Phyrrus of the Samnites. That would be an accidental bit of statesmanship for Phyrrus, which leaves Rome disadvantaged in a future war.
