MagicalRabbit
Banned
What if the future Kaiser Wilhelm II dies young, say between 1870 and 1880 (due to some illness/disease, a very severe fall down the stairs, or something else)?
Obviously this would mean that Wilhelm's younger brother Heinrich would become Kaiser in 1888; that said, how exactly would Heinrich's rule have been different than Wilhelm's?
My educated guess would be that, without a withered arm and an insecurity complex, Heinrich would do a better job of governing than Wilhelm. To elaborate, Bismarck might or might not eventually still get fired (Bismarck's behavior during the anti-socialist bill fiasco actually was a decent reason to fire him), I doubt that Heinrich would have done that much to advance democracy and constitutionalism in Germany due to the opposition of the Prussian military and Junkers, and I doubt that Heinrich would have agreed to increase the size of the German Navy to the extent that Wilhelm did. In regards to foreign policy, I would think that Heinrich would have tried harder to maintain friendly relations with Russia (by renewing the Reinsurance Treaty, et cetera) and with Britain (again, by not building up Germany's navy, by not behaving aggressively in foreign affairs, et cetera). German-French relations are probably still strained due to Alsace-Lorraine (any attempts by Heinrich to resolve this problem would have probably been blocked by the German military).
Anyway, in this scenario, I think that there would have been different alliance combinations in comparison to real life. In fact, once Russia's power begins increasing more and more, I could see Heinrich creating alliances between Germany and Britain, the Ottoman Empire, and Japan in an attempt to control and encircle Russia. World War I might or might not eventually occur in this scenario; however, with the rise of Russian power, if World War I does not already occur, then I could see World War I breaking out in the late 1920s or 1930s after Germany realizes that it needs a war to break out soon in order to defeat and weaken Russia and after Germany exploits a foreign crisis to cause war to break out (in fact, this is what actually occurred in real life in 1914, though with a more favorable alliance system for Germany, I think that the "point of no return" for Germany would have been much later in this scenario).
Thoughts on this?
Obviously this would mean that Wilhelm's younger brother Heinrich would become Kaiser in 1888; that said, how exactly would Heinrich's rule have been different than Wilhelm's?
My educated guess would be that, without a withered arm and an insecurity complex, Heinrich would do a better job of governing than Wilhelm. To elaborate, Bismarck might or might not eventually still get fired (Bismarck's behavior during the anti-socialist bill fiasco actually was a decent reason to fire him), I doubt that Heinrich would have done that much to advance democracy and constitutionalism in Germany due to the opposition of the Prussian military and Junkers, and I doubt that Heinrich would have agreed to increase the size of the German Navy to the extent that Wilhelm did. In regards to foreign policy, I would think that Heinrich would have tried harder to maintain friendly relations with Russia (by renewing the Reinsurance Treaty, et cetera) and with Britain (again, by not building up Germany's navy, by not behaving aggressively in foreign affairs, et cetera). German-French relations are probably still strained due to Alsace-Lorraine (any attempts by Heinrich to resolve this problem would have probably been blocked by the German military).
Anyway, in this scenario, I think that there would have been different alliance combinations in comparison to real life. In fact, once Russia's power begins increasing more and more, I could see Heinrich creating alliances between Germany and Britain, the Ottoman Empire, and Japan in an attempt to control and encircle Russia. World War I might or might not eventually occur in this scenario; however, with the rise of Russian power, if World War I does not already occur, then I could see World War I breaking out in the late 1920s or 1930s after Germany realizes that it needs a war to break out soon in order to defeat and weaken Russia and after Germany exploits a foreign crisis to cause war to break out (in fact, this is what actually occurred in real life in 1914, though with a more favorable alliance system for Germany, I think that the "point of no return" for Germany would have been much later in this scenario).
Thoughts on this?