The Extra Girl: For the first heaven and the first earth were passed away.

Lisbon earthquake (1755). Major impact on European philosophical thought.

Tambora eruption (1815). 1816 was "the year without a summer".

Irish potato blight (1845-1850). Caused millions of Irish to emigrate.

Mississippi floods (1927). ITTL, the Mississippi may change course to the Atchafalaya (prevented OTL by massive public works).

I think in the first iteration of the timeline I did something with the potato blight. So, if I recall previous reading on the blight, it originally arose in the American west. The reason it became a serious issue in Ireland specifically was because potato cultivation was such a monoculture, which allowed the blight to spread fast through the crop. Of course that monoculture also magnified the consequences of the crop failure because of the potato's role in diet, and from there we get into all the questions of economic policy. But in the first iteration, which I am inclined to do again, the blight hits elsewhere rather than Ireland, and destabilizes other governments, the trick being that human factors like overcultivation don't necessarily follow the same pattern.

But all those ideas are interesting. Thanks!
 
Very funny. One guesses that the republiekthaler is a small-value currency, like the yen or the Italian lira.

No, the intent is they are really just that comically screwed. The idea is that in the alt-world there had been some successful megascale engineering projects, like Friedrichsland's Great Backwards River, which created a romance for them in the popular imagination of other countries. So then this idea came along, found some enthusiastic backers, and for a time it steamrolled all the concerns, fiscal, fishing, environmental and otherwise. Probably what has happened is that England stepped in to say "Polders in the middle of the North Sea to drain an area the size of Cyprus? Like hell." Or there was simply a taxpayer's revolt.
 

Beatriz

Gone Fishin'
The foreshadowed earlier colonization of Africa and the Middle East seems to be a byproduct of stronger states in the 18th century. Are there other factors?
 
Last edited:
The foreshadowed earlier colonization of Africa and the Middle East seems to be a byproduct of stronger states in the 18th century. Are there other factors?

So, all this will sound super-simplistic, but greater mass literacy earlier is going to drive faster technological change and population growth. And this is going to be some of the heavy lifting the timeline has ahead of it, both during the First General War and after.

Also, there will be more competitors in global colonization. We already have a situation in which there is no Great Britain. Instead, in its place are two vying powers, England and Scotland. One certainly has an obvious advantage over the other, but is certainly not as powerful as the two united. So, one broad tendency in the upcoming colonial chapters is England's inability to achieve preeminence by itself. It does well, but it never achieves the hegemonic reach that the UK does by the death of Victoria. So in its reduced shadow midsized powers flourish, and the competition among them pushes matters further earlier. Some of the developments that are going to make for this different colonial landscape we are going to start seeing very soon.
 
Last edited:
576px-Vladislav_Hall-old_Royal_Palace_at_Prague_castle.jpg

Vladislav Hall at Prague Castle, built 1493-1502 by Benedikt Reit

Prefatory Note VII: The Bohemian Reformation
Partly due to a strong tradition of the use of a vernacular written language, the Bible was translated into Czech in the fourteenth century. The only vernacular translations of the whole Bible that predate the Czech were in French and Italian. At around the same time, from virtually the moment it was founded in 1348, the University of Prague became a center of preaching against the perceived abuses and excesses of the Catholic Church, especially with respect to simony. While at first this preaching, in Czech, German and Latin, was meant as an internal criticism of Catholicism by other Catholics, eventually different sets of practices and beliefs began to evolve, including different practices around Communion, a greater reliance on the biblical text as the source of doctrine, and a focus on individual spirituality and a personal relationship to God, though none of these specifically would be enough to constitute a break with the Catholic tradition. One influential statement of the rapidly evolving tenets of Bohemian faith was Regulae Veteris et Novi Testamenti, by Matthias of Janov, a canon of the Cathedral of St. Vitus in Prague. Collecting essays written by Matthias between 1381 and his death in 1394, no complete edition exists because copies were so thoroughly hunted down and destroyed in ensuing centuries.

One of the centers of the new religious movement was Bethlehem Chapel, in Prague. There, sermons were only delivered in Czech, to a congregation that could number as many as 3,000 people. One prominent preacher at Bethlehem Chapel, carried matters further, delivering sermons influenced by the English theologian John Wycliff. Huss declared that Jesus Christ and not the Pope was the true leader of the Catholic Church, and was openly pessimistic about the ability of the Church to reform itself. Instead, Huss took the view that the confiscation of property by secular authorities would help the Church to focus on its true, exclusively spiritual, mission. During this same period Huss and the other leaders of the Bohemian religious movement received the protection of the Bohemian King Wenceslaus IV of the House of Luxembourg.

Though Huss had occasionally accepted the judgment of the church that Wycliff was heretical, in 1412 he delivered an attack on the sale of indulgences and on the theological justifcations for crusades that was almost a verbatim copy of Wycliff's. The church began executing men who declared openly that indulgences were fraudulent and that the church had no authority to exchange the forgiveness of sins for money. Wenceslaus, understanding matters had gone too far, demanded that Huss recant and the university repress these views, but the response came that these ideas first had to be proven to be unbiblical. Wenceslaus called for a synod, which was held at the Palace of the Archbishop of Prague, so that Huss would be unable to attend in person. The result was a pained compromise, which displeased both Catholics who demanded the absolute competence and authority of the Church be accepted, and the reformers who sought to subordinate the institution of the Church to the biblical text and to the symbolic leadership of the Church by the biblical Jesus.

The whole drama had both made Huss and the cause of reform more popular than ever and sparked riots and public disorder throughout Bohemia. Fleeing the legal authorities into the countryside, Huss began setting down his principles in Czech, wanting to make them as accessible as possible to ordinary Christians. Much of these texts were translated and summarized passages from Wycliff. They were smuggled back into Prague, and read before the congregation at Bethlehem Chapel. Eventually, Huss's antagonists in the Catholic Church having themsevles been forced to flee, Huss was able to return in 1413. By this point however, a Church council had declared Wycliff's writing's heretical. Wenceslaus's brother, Sigismund, King of the Romans, called a General Council of the Church in Constance to decide the questions presented by Huss and the other nonconforming Christians in Bohemia. Huss announced he would attend and accept the Council's judgment. He was given a safe-conduct to attend the council by the pope, but after his arrival continued preaching and otherwise violating the terms of the safe-conduct.

Huss was brought first into the residence of a canon, then cast into the prison of a Dominican monastery. When Sigismund protested that the safe-conduct had been violated, the Augustinians informed him that he did not have to honor promises to a heretic. From there Huss was brought into the custody of the Bishop of Constance, where he was kept in poor conditions for 73 days, denied outside contact, and not allowed to prepare arguments in his defense. At trial, Huss refused to recant, and now explicitly disavowed any prior condemnation of Wycliff, who had previously been declared a heretic at a prior council. Challenged directly, Huss said his soul aspired to be where Wycliff's now was. Sigismund now demanded Huss renounce any heretical beliefs and submit himself to the authority of the Council. Repeatedly, Huss asked that the prosecutors of the Church prove his views were in error only making use of arguments from scripture. Thus, Huss was found to be a heretic and burned to death.

In Bohemia, the popularity of Huss's views had only grown over the course of the controversy and trial, and news of his execution was met with absolute fury. In the Bohemian Protest, 100 leading Bohemian subjects put their name to a document calling Huss "a good, just and Catholic man", which could conceivably expose them to the same legal jeopardy as Huss had faced. In 1419, Wenceslaus died, and his brother Sigismund as his heir was unable to assume legal authority in Bohemia due to the unrest. The next year, under Pope Martin V, the Roman Catholic Church declared a crusade against Bohemia and authorized the execution of everyone there holding to the beliefs of Wycliff and Huss. By this point most likely this described the majority of the population of the country. Under the leadership of Jan Zizka and Prokop the Great, the rebels defeated the crusade. Three more crusades followed, and the Hussite wars did not end until a compromise was reached at the Council of Basel in 1436.

In the Compacts of Basel, the Bohemian Church was allowed its own observances, within limits. Sigismund, who had supported the crusades against Bohemia, died the next year, and he was succeeded by Albert, who also enjoyed a brief reign. Thus the first king to truly grapple with the practical consequnces of the Compacts of Basel was Ladislaus the Posthumous. In 1454 he became the first crowned king of Bohemia since Wenceslaus IV. Ladislaus thus became the first of a long line of kings to subscribe to the Roman Catholic Church, while using the traditional recognition of the liberties of the Bohemian estates as a means of guaranteeing tolerance of the kingdom's divergent religious faith, within limits. Nonetheless, Ladislaus died suddenly. The next king, George of Prodebrady, was a native Bohemian elected unanimously by a Bohemian Estates who had grown wary of foreign-born rulers. George sought to take a permissive attitude on religious questions, and won support from both Bohemian Catholics and the supporters of Huss. Nonetheless, Pope Pius II declared the compromises worked out between the Catholic leadership and the Hussite factions of Bohemia to be void. King George rejected this, but undertook the half-measure of repressing some of the more radical factions within the Bohemian Crown lands.

Over time, members of the Catholic nobility became more dissastisfied, and elected their own candidate as King of Bohemia. Pope Paul II then excommunicated George, and the Holy Roman Emperor and King of Hungary joined in the war to depose him. On George's death, with the war continuing, the Bohemian nobles elected as King of Bohemia Vladislaus, son of the King of Poland. The Jagiellons' participation in the war on the side of the Bohemians led Pope Sixtus IV to excommunicate them in 1472 before a truce was signed two years later. In 1479 the war finally ended with the division of the crown lands of Bohemia between Vladislaus II and the King of Hungary, with one empowered to redeem the other's lands for a price on his death. During this same period, the Bohemian Estates began sitting as the Bohemian Diet, passing laws and recording them. With the war over, Vladislaus, who was himself a Catholic, began quietly attempting to restore Catholic authority, even though he was unable to reestablish the Catholic Archbishopric of Prague. This led to a fresh revolt by the Hussites in 1483 which also targeted Germans and Jews in Prague. This revolt ended in 1485 with a compromise at Kutna Hora under which not just noblemen, but burghers, would be free to choose to practice Catholicism or the Hussite faith. Eventually in 1490, Vladislaus succeeded to the Hungarian throne as well, and the tasks associated with that reign, most especially the situation with the Ottomans, consumed his attentions until his death in 1516.

Vladislaus II was succeeded in both Bohemia and Hungary by his son Louis. While still only twenty years of age, Louis led a campaign against the Ottomans as of King Hungary. In a disastrous defeat at Mohacs, Louis was killed and most of the Hungarian nobility was lost with him. On Louis's death, his closest heir was his sister Anna, who could not rule at that time under the rules of Bohemia and Hungary's elective monarchies. Anna however was married to Ferdinand of the House of Habsburg, younger brother of Charles V. His election, partly on the basis of her familial claim as a Jagiellon, began the long Habsburg tenure in Bohemia. Not long after the Habsburgs took power, a disastrous fire in Prague Castle destroyed many of the records in the castle in which various special rights and privileges of the Bohemian nobility had been recorded.

It would be a mistake however to assume that Habsburg rule in Bohemia was a period of uniform repression. The Emperor Maximilian II, who reigned in Bohemia as King Maximilian I, codified the Confessio Bohemica, a document which ratified and expanded the Basel Compacts to include Bohemian reformers other than the Ultraquists. He also ratified the Statuta Judaeorum, which guaranteed some rights to Jews in the lands of the Bohemian Crown. In 1583, Maximilian's son Rudolf, who was also Holy Roman Emperor, King of Hungary and ruler of the hereditary Austrian Habsburg lands, made Prague his seat, which made him particularly popular. For the most part, Rudolf respected the established religious settlement in Bohemia, until late in his reign in the same effort to court the support of the Catholic Church in his war with the Ottomans that sparked the Bocksai Revolt in Hungary, Rudolf undertook to promote Catholicism. As a result, in 1609 Hussite and Protestant noblemen broke into Prague Castle and forced Rudolf to sign the Letter of Majesty, freshly guaranteeing their rights. The Letter of Majesty also established a Bohemian Church under broadly Hussite and Lutheran principles. Rudolf's authority having already been badly compromised by the Brother's Quarrel, he was to a great extent a prisoner of these nobles in Prague Castle for the rest of his life.

By 1618, Bohemia is only 15 percent Roman Catholic, and Moravia, 35 percent. The balance of the rest is any of the several Hussite factions, including the more moderate Ultraquists, but also the Unity of the Brethren and Lutherans. Perhaps three percent of the population is Calvinist. This had significance for the opening stage of the Thirty Years War, as the Calvinist Frederick V of the Palatinate and his wife Elizabeth found they had less support among the Bohemian nobility than they thought they would, once their Calvinist preferences, including a resistance to figurative religious art, became well known in Prague.
 
Der_junge_Friedrich_V._C-B_011.jpg

Friedrich V, Elector Palatine (1613), by Michiel Jansz van Mierevelt

King Christian's Reach, by Maurice Starling

from Chapter II: A Shipwreck on the Coast of Bohemia

When the Elector Christian arrived at the 1613 Imperial Diet in Regensburg, he had high hopes. Through the efforts of his energetic chancellor, Kellensdorf, he had reached an accommodation with the new Emperor Matthias. Christian had voted for Matthias to become Emperor, Matthias had dropped all objections to Christians succeeding to the electoral dignity held by his grandfather and receiving the Juelich inheritance. It seemed all that remained was for the imperial diet to ratify all the necessary arrangements. Except that was not what happened.

Christian's elevation to the electoral dignity that he had just used to help Matthias to the imperial throne was ratified by the diet. But when it came to the Juelich Succession, matters became complicated very quickly. And Christian was a man with meager taste for complication. Essentially, though Matthias had literally upheld his end of the bargain and had not acted to frustrate Christian's accession to the Juelich duchies, nor had he imposed the imperial ban on Christian for his impulsive effort to seize Koln, the poor deportment by one of the most powerful princes in the empire had left a sour taste in many mouths.

So, the measure ratifying Christian's investiture with Juelich, with Cleves, with Berg, with the County of Mark, and the Counties of Ravensberg and Ravenstein, simply never came up. It was explained to Christian, with patience and some discretion, this was no slight or questioning of his rights by the Emperor. It was simply, rather, there was very little chance such a measure ratifying his inheritance would pass the Diet, and so it was in Christian's own interest that it not be addressed at all rather than for his legal rights to be negated in an imperial forum.

Moreover, he was informed, one reason he would not have the votes to ratify his inheritance was the breadth of his holdings. Saxony had steadily absorbed first Albertine Saxony and now the Juelich lands, which previously had cast their own votes in the diet. What were called the Appended Realms still acted in the Diets as if they were independent territories and cities of the empire. Nonetheless, Saxon expansion, and those of its allies during the Spanish War, had culled the votes it could have otherwise relied on to clinch the matter of Juelich at the Diet, once and for all.

Enraged, and believing Matthias to be walking back the deal, Christian did all that he could to make the Diet of Regensburg, intended to be the first of Matthias's reign and the dawn of a new era of comity in the Empire, as bitter as possible. Citing corruption allegations against the imperial treasury, he refused to pay Saxony's assessed share of the defense of the Military Frontier. Citing the lingering complaints by the Palatinate and other radical Protestant states his grandfather had studiously ignored in similar proceedings, he refused to consent to the imperial legal system returning to operation following its cessation in 1609 following the previous, failed Diet. And finally, with the Palatine, Anhalt and their allies, he refused to consent to a recess, or an official statement summarizing the Diet, essentially turning it into a repeat of the 1609 failure.

Of course, the money Saxon taxes had raised for its contribution to the Military Frontier would still be spent. They would just be spent on modernizing and enlarging the fortifications held by Saxon garrisons on those same lands of Juelich, Cleves, Berg, Mark, Ravensberg and Ravenstein that had been at issue, particularly those on the duchies' western frontier facing the Spanish Netherlands and the Archbishopric of Liege, from which any effort to seize them would most likely come. Of course, these fortifications now had a double purpose: the Dutch rebels had relied on the promise of imperial neutrality for reassurance that the Spanish army would attack its eastern frontier, a promise the Spanish had been occasionally happy to flout. But with Saxony possessing and fortifying the entire Juelich inheritance, and with the Palatinate also folded into a military alliance, almost all of the Rhine frontier would be impassable to armies from the Spanish Netherlands.

Of the many sea changes in Saxon policy with Christian's accession, perhaps the most dramatic was that the Dutch were no longer objects of sympathy on a venture too uncertain to risk the future of the Saxon state and the Empire, but instead close allies who would necessarily rise or fall with that of the Electorate. Moreover, to a growing extent the Saxons and Dutch even had an army in common. It had been Alexander in his final days who had used the beginning of the Twelve Years Truce in the Netherlands to aggressively recruit veterans from the wars to form the core of a new standing Saxon army, separate from the forces used to garrison the defenses and guard the princes. On Christian's return at the end of the Juelich War he had fixed the number of this at 6,000 infantry, quartered in Weimar. In 1614, Christian created a second standing force, which was quartered at Dueren, in the west, where the Holy Prince had landed his first blow against Charles V.

The Juelich War had brought Christian into contact with the new Dutch tactics and the sophisticated school of war the Spanish had evolved to counter them. Previous Saxon ignorance of these developments seemed a better explanation of defeat than questions of his own talent or competence, so drilling them into the Saxon army became an idee fixe. Alexander Leslie, a professional Scottish soldier of low birth who had served in the Netherlands before the Truce with some success, had been hired for these purposes originally by Alexander, but in 1615 he was given the brief by Christian to train all new soldiers entering Saxon service.

Fancifully, not only would they number about as many soldiers the old legions of the Roman Empire did, but the armies would have a system of numbering and the designation of the official principality they served and the town in which they had been raised. The standing army at Weimar would be officially the I Saxon-Weimar, the one at Dueren would be II Juelich-Dueren. If that were not enough, the title of legate was revived: the legate would be a professional military officer entrusted with the day-to-day operations of each army who would be tasked with implementing the military decisions of the prince (such as Christian) entrusted with the general's baton. The idea was proposed by Leslie, but had truly originated with the Duke Friedrich. Unbeknownst to Christian, the legate was also intended to act as a brake on foolhardy or reckless decisions from above.

There was some effort to persuade Christian to appoint his uncle Friedrich governor, regent, or some other office that would allow him to reside in the new western territories, react in exigent circumstances and lead armies there as needed. And it was pointed out that as the son-in-law of William of Orange and Brother-in-law of Moritz of Orange, he was superbly placed to manage the practical necessities of a Dutch alliance if Saxony came in sudden need of one due to an attack from the west. This, Christian was certain he did not want, perhaps recalling that the original marriage alliances with the ducal house of Mark had been to perhaps create a territorial principality befitting a Wettin second son, just like his uncle. And Christian fully realized those familial connections with the House of Orange would only be an advantage to Friedrich in carving out just such a realm in the west. Saxony's young elector had not gone to such trouble only to bestow such a gift on his uncle, so he held direct power over all the Saxon lands, from Ravenstein to Sagan.

At the same time, Christian's external connections with other princes changed dramatically. Duke Heinrich--called "Uncle Brunswick"--ruled the biggest and richest of the Welf duchies, and had enjoyed a privileged place among Christian's relations first as the husband of Christian's aunt Johanna, and second as a Lutheran of stern enough orthodoxy he was tolerable to Christian's mother, Elisabeth of Denmark. But Uncle Brunswick had distanced himself in the heat of the Juelich War, disapproving of Christian's behavior and positioning himself as an intermediary for a discreet truce rather than an ally in the cause of victory. Ailing, in the grip of the alcoholism that afflicted so many German princes of his generation, Heinrich of Braunschweig even before his death found himself unceremoniously discarded by his nephew.

In his place were surprising new mentors and companions for the young Elector. In her way, the arrival of Elizabeth of Scotland and the change she effected upon Christian's attitude towards the Calvinists made all the rest possible. Suddenly Christian's closest friends among the imperial princes were Frederick of the Palatinate and Christian of Anhalt. They wasted no time introducing Christian to esoteric and millenarian religious writings that prophesied not only that the final battle for the Empire was at hand, but the End of Days itself. Among the writers whose work they introduced Christian to was Jan Amos Comnenius of the Czech Unity of the Brethren, as well as the mystic works of the Rosicrucians. The new electress herself shared and eagerly encouraged these interests. What Elisabeth of Denmark thought of all this can only too readily be guessed.

Perhaps Christian's sudden interest in these works of apocalyptic mysticism, lay in that they were so different from the stout and orthodox Lutheranism he grew up with, which was still propounded with vigor by the official court preacher, Matthias Hoe von Hoenigg. A native of Vienna, Hoe strongly championed Lutheran orthodoxy against both Catholic and Calvinist extremes in a manner that won him the strong support of the Elector's mother. By 1613 Hoe had written seven books, all attacks on Catholic theology. He had just shifted focus to train his fire on Calvinist teaching when Elizabeth of Scotland arrived at court, and suddenly the world changed. The prince Hoe had come to believe would make every last Christian congregation in the Holy Roman Empire Lutheran now informed him in no uncertain terms that given the Calvinists were pivotal allies in the imminent struggle against the Papists, Hoe could publish no direct attacks on them while he held his position at court. Similar instructions were relayed to the universities.

Of course, this was only the beginning of a long struggle, that of the famous division over the course of the seventeenth century between "the confession of the court" and "the confession of the heart", as the sovereigns of Wittenberg to various extents personally explored religious doctrines that were at odds with Lutheran teachings. To some extent, this tension had been at the heart of the Saxon experiment since Andreas Karlstadt was teaching the New Testament to the future Friedrich IV. But it took on new urgency during the First General War, with the confessional stakes as high as they were. And it would take on a completely different dimension once Comenius was not merely the absent author of some manuscripts handed around the court, but one of the Elector's closest spiritual advisors.

.In the feverish energy of the pre-war years, one of the last pieces put into place was the Fruit-bearing Society. The schools founded by Duke Moritz and Elector Friedrich IV had led to a flourishing of Saxon cultural energy in the last half of the sixteenth century, which had also been fed by the waves of English, French and Dutch expatriates making their way to Wittenberg from repressive regimes elsewhere in Europe, and supported by the growing Saxon commercial economy. "Shining Wittenberg" contributed immeasurably to Saxon cultural prestige, but it had as yet little cachet in terms of the all-important question of imperial politics.

That is, until 1617, when Friedrich of the Palatinate's younger brother Ludwig founded the Fruit-bearing Society at Amberg, in the Upper Palatinate. It was a literary society welcoming Lutheran, Calvinist and any other Protestant writers, and which would in practice include some Catholics eager for a German national cultural revival. Venerating the memory of the Holy Prince, the Fruit-bearing Society, which quickly established chapters throughout the Empire, functioned among other things as a network of supporters of the Saxon cause. Some of the first bound volumes of work produced by its members were poems dedicated to the young and beautiful Electress of Saxony, who of course had not yet bothered to learn the German language in which these poems were written.

Christian had been ready, of course, to just ride into Bohemia, and campaign for the kingship at the meeting of the Bohemian Estates in 1617 opposite Ferdinand of Styria. Famously, he almost had to be physically restrained from doing so. Instead the plan that had been forced upon him had been to make clear his willingness to defend the traditional rights of the Bohemian Estates to the interested parties, to wait for an invitation from the Estates to act, and to maintain military readiness for when they did. Towards this purpose in 1618 and early 1619, two more armies, III Saxon-Magdeburg and IV Saxon-Wittenberg Franzoesisch, were raised making use of contributions from the merchants of the Electorate's largest and wealthiest town, and the flourishing French Calvinist community of Wittenberg, more eager than ever to curry favor with the prince.

One can only imagine Christian's impatience as word of each subsequent event arrived in Wittenberg--the revocation of the Letter of Majesty, the Defenestration of Prague, the Election of Ferdinand as Holy Roman Emperor, and then Bohemia's descent into civil war between Habsburg loyalists and the Hussite and Protestant nobility. Every advisor in the electoral court, including his mother and wife and aunt Eleanore, so insistent at worming her way back into power, begged that Christian wait until he was offered the Bohemian throne, so that he would enter the fray not a rebel but a king. But that offer from the Bohemian Estates seemed to take forever to arrive. And when finally it did in 1619, Christian at first thought it was a joke.

It was from a new confederacy which purported to represent the interests of each of the five component realms of the crown lands of Bohemia. It represented a complicated new constitutional arrangement approved by the Estates which would establish a constitutional monarchy with legislative power invested in a permanent diet. It offered a grant of limited power, which would absolutely exclude all matters pertaining to religion. A great part of the romance of Bohemia for Christian had been not merely that being its king would mean being offered a crown, but that finally he would enjoy the commensurate power and respect of a king. Rather than being henpecked and bullied by jumped-up tradesmen from the Estates General, he would have a realm in which his word would be law, just as the Habsburgs' had been previously. Instead, he would not even have as much power within the state as he had as the Elector of Saxony.

Christian's first instinct was to reject the offer. He was determined to write back and to say that he would only accept the kingship of Bohemia on the same terms it had previously been held by Ferdinand. He would, he said in the draft letter, which still survives, "not succeed into smaller shoes." He meant this to begin a negotiation with the Bohemian Estates during which he might perhaps wring some greater powers from them and perhaps some guarantees about the funding of the war, which was of some concern. The scene this sparked was the inverse of the one two years before, in which he now faced a wall of wife, mother and aunt, telling him the only answer he needed to send was a yes, and that any equivocation might cost him the moment they had waited so long for.

Still, in a rare display of doubt, Christian hesitated. Ironically it was despised Aunt Eleanora who clinched the matter on the side of acceptance. "Most serene highness, do you not understand, these negotiations are always best undertaken when one's army is already inside the walls? On my faith, that's what the Habsburgs do."

And so the reply to the Bohemian Estates, scrawled that night in Christian's own hand, said little more of substance than "yes" and "we'll be along shortly."
 
Last edited:
Initial combatants of the First General War at the Onset of Hostilities, 1619
Small map 1618.jpg

Habsburg realms (Hungary, the hereditary lands of Upper and Lower Austria, Styria, etc.) are represented in yellow. Wettin realms (Saxony, Juelich, etc.) are represented
in dark green. Lands of the Electoral Palatinate are represented in light blue. The Landgraviate of Hesse-Kassel is represented in pink. The Landgraviate of Hesse-Darmstadt is represented in brown. Anhalt is represented in red. The Bohemian crown lands are represented in orange.
 
No, the intent is they are really just that comically screwed. The idea is that in the alt-world there had been some successful megascale engineering projects, like Friedrichsland's Great Backwards River, which created a romance for them in the popular imagination of other countries. So then this idea came along, found some enthusiastic backers, and for a time it steamrolled all the concerns, fiscal, fishing, environmental and otherwise. Probably what has happened is that England stepped in to say "Polders in the middle of the North Sea to drain an area the size of Cyprus? Like hell." Or there was simply a taxpayer's revolt.
I do appreciate the glimpse of an even more dysfunctional Netherlands a few days before the election. Really puts those dismal polls into perspective.
 
Arolsen_Klebeband_01_363.jpg

Count Jindrich Matyas von Thurn by Willem Jacobsz Deiff, 1625

"Throw them out the window, as is customary"

Ahmed Bregenz

As religious non-conformists in the Bohemian crown lands lost hope that the Habsburg kings would continue to respect their right to observe their various faiths, Count Jindrich Mattyas Thurn emerged as the foremost leader of the effort to either defend the tenuous Bohemian religious settlement as it had been passed down, or eject once and for all, the ruling house that so persistently endangered it. Thurn had originally been born in Innsbruck to Lutheran parents who had originally immigrated from Italy. He first came to Bohemia when his family was granted lands in Lipnice, which he inherited on his father's death. In his youth he visited Istanbul and saw much of the Ottoman Empire, before serving the Habsburgs in the Long Turkish War of 1593-1606. His religion proved no barrier to his advancement, and he received extensive lands in Bohemia and Croatia, A colonel and imperial war councilor, Thurn was made burgrave of Karlstein Castle, where the Bohemian crown jewels were kept, and in 1605 he entered the Bohemian estates.

As a Protestant, Count Thurn was forced out of the Bohemian Estates by Rudolf II's spasmodic attempt to impose religious discipline on the polyglot Bohemian nation in 1608, despite having commanded forces against Stephen Bocksai during the Protestant rebel's attempt to invade Bohemia not too long before. The next year, Rudolf's resources and credit exhausted by the Long Turkish War, the Bocksai Rebellion and the Brother's Quarrel, Thurn helped orchestrate the seizure of the Emperor by the angry Protestant nobles in his quarters at Prague Castle. It was under Thurn's hectoring that Rudolf capitulated and agreed to the terms of what would become known as the Letter of Majesty.

Under the terms of the Letter of Majesty, the lords, knights and towns of Bohemia were all allowed to choose their Christian confession. Likewise, the lords, knights and towns were to elect from their respective bodies of the Estates ten Defensors. These Defensors then in turn elected Vaclav Budovec von Budov their president. Thurn for his part was named co-commander of the Protestant militia. Simultaneously Protestants received appointments to key positions from which they could begin, broadly speaking, a state church. A month later, Silesia received its own Letter of Majesty, under which Lutheranism and Catholicism were granted legal equality. Chancellor Lobkowitz led the Catholic nobility in refusing to recognize the Letter of Majesty.

Matthias had accepted these terms in order to succeed Rudolf as King of Bohemia, but perhaps recognizing the non-conformists of Bohemia had wrung these concessions out of Rudolf by virtue of obtaining physical custody over him, Matthias wasted no time moving the imperial court back to Vienna. Prague, not merely smarting from the lack of prestige but the loss of trade and traffic that the imperial court brought with it, fiercely resented the loss, At the same time, understanding that with Matthias and Maximilian aging and childless, most likely the Habsburg succession would result in the elevation of an opponent of Bohemian religious liberty to the throne, whether Ferdinand, Leopold or Albrecht.

The correspondence between Thurn and Kellensdorf may have begun even earlier than Thurn's involvement in the revolt that won the Letter of Majesty. Clearly, Thurn leapt at the opportunity of a contact who was also a close advisor of the heir to the preeminent German Protestant state, one that coincidentally bordered on Bohemia. Kellensdorf, a devout Lutheran from Transylvania strenuously opposed to the Habsburgs and interested in finding eastern counterweights to Habsburg power, found his and Thurn's interests and outlooks closely aligned, Once Christian was invested with the electoral dignity and Kellensdorf his chancellor, Thurn placed his hopes squarely on Wittenberg. The other Protestant princes who might intervene to defend Bohemia's constitutional arrangements were too Calvinist, too distant, or represented states that were too weak. Saxony had squared shoulders with the Habsburgs once before, and that was before Christian had inherited his slew of duchies in the Empire's west.

Most likely, Christian's eagerness to contest the Bohemian royal election of 1617 lay in Thurn's optimistic appraisals of his chances in letters to Kellensdorf, Thurn despaired when Christian failed to enter Bohemia and contest the election that resulted in Ferdinand of Styria being crowned as the replacement for the dying Matthias, and as it was he cast one of only two dissenting votes in the Estates against Ferdinand. He despaired even more when Kellensdorf fell from power in Wittenberg. The new chancellor, Ludwig Dieter von Brehna, while no friend of the Habsburgs and in line with Christian's preference for militancy of sentiment, was far more parsimonious in his promises to Thurn of assistance in preserving Bohemian liberty.

Ferdinand responded to the slight of Thurn's vote against him by replacing the count as burgrave of Karlstein with a loyalist, partly because he wanted to make sure that the Bohemian crown jewels that were kept there remained safe. Though Ferdinand had signaled his acceptance of the Letter of Majesty to win the Bohemian election, it was believed under threat, and a special meeting of the Protestant nobility convened in Prague in March 1618 to draft a letter to the dying Emperor Matthias about the issue. Matthias's minister Archbishop Melchior Kiesl's reply to what he saw as Thurn's troublemaking was to prohibit the nobles from meeting further. Thurn and his allies saw this as a breach of the terms of the Letter in and of itself. Meeting in defiance of the ban, and fanning fears that the revocation of the Letter of Majesty was imminent, Thurn and his supporters on May 21, 1618 forced his way into Prague Castle, where they found four of the regents appointed by Ferdinand to administer the kingdom in his absence.

Repeating the protest of the Hussites in July 1419, at Thurn's insistence the mob threw the regents from the window of the castle. Two of the men were killed by the fall.

At this point the Protestant Defensors declared themselves a Diet and assumed the administration of the country. They elected twelve directors from each of the three Bohemian Estates to assume the regency and chancellery duties. Ferdinand's appointees were replaced, and the state proceeded under the official fiction that the Emperor Matthias had resumed his role at its helm, though he was for all the Bohemians knew already dead. In concessions to make the revolution appear less sectarian, a Catholic was appointed to the Directorate and the new state was forbidden from seizing the property of the Catholic Church. Taxes were rechanneled into the raising of an army, and mobilization of every tenth peasant and eighth burgher was ordered. Though the mobilization failed, by September Thurn had at his command 12,000 mercenaries.

At this critical point, the Austrian Habsburgs were divided. Ferdinand, as king of Bohemia the object of the revolt, felt the Emperor Matthias and his chief minister Kiesl had been far too accommodating of the Bohemians and in so doing had brought on the revolt. Forced to contend with removing Kiesl and circumscribing Matthias, Ferdinand's attentions were divided. Initially, the towns of Pilsen, Krumau and Budweis remained loyal to the Habsburgs. Thurn repulsed an initial effort by Count Bucquoy to advance from Lower Austria into the loyal towns. In an unwelcome surprise to Thurn, the Moravian Protestant leader Karel Zierotin refused to break with the Habsburgs and endorse the new regime, as he was still hoping for a peaceful compromise that would guarantee freedom of worship.

By this point, Thurn had hoped his actions would trigger a flow of assistance from Saxony, rather than mere letters. He was disappointed, as Count Brehna, probably taking dictation from some of Christian's more cautious relatives, insisted that before any money, weapons or soldiers would be dispatched from Saxony, Christian would have to be elected king. He could not move against Ferdinand as a rebel that would open him not merely to the scorn and disapproval of the other princes of the empire, but expose him to the possibility of the imperial ban and a war to defend Saxony and all his other holdings. Instead he would have to be invested with the kingship by the Bohemian Estates, making use of the same authority and the same procedures by which Rudolf, Matthias and then Ferdinand had been elected, so that he would have some claim to legal authority in his actions. If there was any hope to winning Bohemia while avoiding the imperial ban, it lay with that distinction. To Thurn's disgust, Saxony's allies and the Protestant Union all assumed the same position. Offer the crown, to get the men and money.

Most members of the Bohemian Estates, however, were persistent in believing the problem was specific to Ferdinand, and not with Matthias, and so they determined to remain loyal to the fiction that Matthias was still king until word actually reached Prague that Matthias was dead.

At this point the war began in earnest, as Bucquoy, a general who had previously served the Habsburgs in the Dutch War, began advancing through Moravia in an effort relieve the three towns still loyal to the Habsburgs. Moravian peasants attacked Bucquoy's supply lines, and he was reduced to pillaging the countryside to feed his army. Another veteran of the Netherlands conflict, Count Mansfeld, arrived and entered Bohemian service, laying siege to Pilsen, which soon surrendered. Thurn received further reinforcements from Silesia, where the Protestants had taken power in the provincial diet. Though Bucquoy eventually made his way to Krumau and Budweis, by the time he did he had lost half his men.

To this point the momentum was clearly with Thurn. Count Brehna assured Thurn that Saxony was making its own preparations, and would offer massive assistance as soon as the matter of kingship was settled. But he advised that pending Saxony's intervention, Thurn was to remain in Bohemia and conserve his resources. Gone were the giddy days when Kellensdorf and Thurn conspired in furtherance of a great uprising against the Habsburgs from one corner of their lands to the other. Instead, Saxon strategy was now exclusively directed towards delivering Bohemia safely into Christian's hands.

Especially given that little had as yet arrived from Wittenberg but paper, Thurn gave little deference to this counsel. Instead, recognizing he was paying these armies whether or not he used them, he resolved to use them. He divided his forces. Thurn invaded Moravia to secure its accession and block efforts by the Habsburgs to enter Bohemia through there. Hohenlohe, another experienced hand from the Dutch wars, would supervise the sieges of the Habsburg loyalist towns. And a third general, Schlick, would invade Austria, making common cause with the Lutheran nobility there. At this point hard winter intervened, and all three armies were driven down to perhaps a combined strength of 8,000.

As should have been foreseen, dividing the forces right before winter made all three armies ineffective. Reinforcements relieved the Bohemian sieges, and the Austrians were able to block the advance of the Bohemian armies at the Danube. Suddenly the initiative was moving away from Thurn and towards the Habsburgs. In March 1619, Matthias finally died, and Ferdinand came into possession of the rest of the hereditary Habsburg domains. The rebellious Upper Austrians would neither commit themselves to the course of the Bohemians nor endorse Ferdinand, and began operating under the fiction that Archduke Albrecht was now the ruler. For his part, Ferdinand used the opportunity of Matthias's death to declare that if the rebels laid down their arms, he would award a general amnesty and respect the Letter of Majesty. The Bohemian rebels recognized these offers as cynical and insincere, and rejected them outright.

In April Thurn advanced into Moravia and seized Znaim while the Moravian Estates were in session, with many Moravian regiments defecting to Thurn's force. Wallenstein commanded the Habsburg forces, but faced an uprising in his infantry friendly to the rebel cause, and he was only able to seize the Moravian treasury before retreating back across the border. Ferdinand, appalled by the theft, ordered Wallenstein to return it, and it arrived while Thurn was in negotiations with the Moravian Estates on the terms of their joining the new Bohemian state.

Again flush with optimism following the success in Moravia, Thurn resolved once again to push for a quick victory by taking Vienna. By June 5, 1619, he was just outside the city and waiting for a signal to enter from Lutheran partisans inside the walls. A Protestant uprising inside the city pushed its way into the Hofburg, and members of the mob laid hands on Ferdinand, threatening to defenestrate him much as the Bohemians had done his regents, and forcing him to retreat to the palace chapel before they were dispersed. However, the Protestants never took over the city defenses, and Thurn lacked siege artillery. After a week, with the uprising quelled and the Habsburgs in control of the ways across the Danube, Thurn was forced to retreat. Supporters of Thurn's cause in Austria fled to the town of Horn, where they formed their own government on the Bohemian model and began attempting to raise an army from the local peasantry.

Defeat in Austria was accompanied by a military disaster in Bohemia: Mansfeld moved to join Hohenlohe, only to be intercepted by Bucquoy. Mansfeld took refuge in the town of Zablati, which Bucquoy set on fire. An ammunition dump exploded, and the resulting conflagration forced Mansfeld's army out of the town, where they were cut down by the Habsburg cavalry. Mansfeld himself just barely survived. Rather than coming to Mansfeld's assistance, Hohenlohe had to link up with Thurn's army as it retreated north from Vienna.

In July the electors convened in Frankfurt. The question of who, if anyone, had the power to cast Bohemia's vote in the election was the immediate question. Representatives of the Bohemian regime were denied recognition within the imperial order. At the same time, somewhat surprisingly, the Diet refused to allow Ferdinand to cast Bohemia's vote though he was its king. Had another candidate stood at this moment, the vote would have been deadlocked. Saxony had entertained the possibility that a previous offer of the Bohemian crown to Christian might create an opportunity here. But despite the apparent eagerness of Frederick V of the Palatinate to contest the imperial election, Saxony still feared tipping its hand too early. Brehna wanted to resolve the question of Bohemia while it was still possible to do so without triggering a direct contest over the fate of the empire. So at the last minute Saxony forced Frederick V to stand down, and with the Palatinate and Brandenburg sent only delegates to the election, which sullenly offered their support for Ferdinand as emperor.

Sweet, reliable Saxony, loyal to the House of Austria to the end. Ferdinand's election came on August 28.

Concurrent with the imperial election was a meeting of the Bohemian Estates at which representatives of the allied Austrian nobility were present as observers. Convening at Prague Castle, the Bohemian nobility adopted the 100 Articles, establishing a new government which replaced the provisional system adopted the previous year. The Defensors were given authority as guardians of the constitution, and were established in Silesia, Moravia, and Upper and Lower Lusatia. The religious freedoms established under the Letter of Majesty were extended to all these realms. All Catholic authority over Protestant religious institutions was abolished. The kingship of Bohemia was made explicitly elective, but now each of the realm had the power to cast its own of five total votes for the kingship, with the only special power reserved to Bohemia itself of the five the right to cast a tie-breaker in the event of an even split. Moravia, the region least enthusiastic and under the most compulsion, received its own consistory and university under the arrangement.

Moving to the explicit matter of kingship, the Estates vacated the Bohemian throne on August 19, claiming Ferdinand's previous election in 1617 had been legally imperfect in that all formalities had not been observed. In the end, for all Saxony's feigned reluctance, Christian's interest was only too obvious and Saxony's conditional offer of assistance was well-known. There was a token debate, and talk of offering the throne to Bethlen Gabor. But on August 25, the Estates of Bohemia elected Christian of Saxony its king, and heralds were dispatched to convey the offer to him. Just coincidentally, the Saxon elector was at that moment holding court at the former ducal residence in Dresden, just over the Bohemian frontier on the Elbe.

The Bohemian Estates never received word of the slightest reluctance on his part. By September 2, messengers had already returned: Christian, King of Bohemia was on his way. With him was coming the I Saxon-Weimar, the new flagship Saxon army and the mostly Calvinist III Saxon-Wittenberg Franzoesich, comprising 12,000 troops, plus guard regiments, with more to follow. The new king would be accompanied by his wife, Elizabeth of Scotland, their three children, and his mother, Elisabeth of Denmark. Moreover, Saxony had finally forwarded its requests for assistance to the heroic Bohemian people to the Protestant Union, to his uncle the King of Denmark, his brother-in-law the King of Scotland, and his cousin the King of England.

Though his written missive to the Estates was terse, his address to the court announcing his acceptance and committing Saxony wholesale to the Bohemian cause was as florid and absolute as Christian could possibly make it. He would vindicate that people's faith with his blood if had to, but either way, he would die their king.
 
main-image.jpg

Female Nude Seen from Behind, from a composition by Albrecht Duerer


King Freddie and the War Party

Marie Farmer

Long before Christian accepted the crown of Bohemia, King Frederick had dreaded the whole prospect of war there. Since the first hint of unrest over the accession of Ferdinand of Styria to the throne, various young and unblooded scions of the great English noble houses who had come of age since the Battle of the Bridges on the Tyne, not to mention some aging warhorses like an ever-more-irascible Walter Ralegh, Earl of Devonshire, had beseeched the king for leave to go and fight for the Bohemian Protestant cause. But Frederick calculated that Ferdinand would not be able to reconquer Bohemia and fend off the Protestant territorial princes by himself if Saxony intervened, and that would necessitate the intervention of Spain.

Spain now had every reason to be thankful for Frederick's insistence about the pas in those initial peace negotiations way back in 1604. English trade with the Spanish colonies in the Americas, the Spanish Netherlands and Spain itself was flourishing, and ever more necessary to English commerce generally. Its loss would hurt dearly Frederick's own revenues. So Frederick did not want to carelessly give Spain any reason to revoke the pas, and so now found himself careful to not prejudice Spanish interests in his foreign policy. At the same time, in France the assassination of Henri IV, the succession of the minor Louis XIII and the return to power of the Catholic Church under his ministers left the position of France with respect to the religious situation in Europe uncertain. There too, Frederick did not want to turn friends into enemies.

It was not as if, as many Puritan broadsheets baldly declared, that English policy was simply being set by Madrid and Paris. But neither would Frederick ignore or provoke them. Even among the high nobility, Frederick was isolated. The young Sidney Duke of Northumberland of course wanted to make war on the continent just as his father had, and with his innumerable brothers and cousins agitated to be permitted into foreign service if the king would not act directly. The Seymours, anxious for some great heroic service to the kingdom to anchor their return to power, had war fever too. If anything, there was unseemly competition emerging over who were the most vitriolic proponents of Bohemian liberty.

Stranger though perhaps was the attitude of the Catholics: the Duke of York and the rest of the Stanleys were straining to make sure they were seen as loyal to England before their faith, and so they were offering cautious support for an intervention against the Habsburgs. The Howards were even worse: recalling how battlefield service had repeatedly restored the family's fortunes after periods of disfavor, and more eager and desperate now than ever before, they were agitating vehemently to go to the Continent and prove their love of the king who had killed their patiarchs, by killing their own co-religionists.

In the face of all this bloodthirst and bluster, some of it coming even from the young princes aping talk they had heard from courtiers and playmates, Frederick's justifications about commerce and ledgers and the cost of war could find no purchase, and so the king just spent as much time as possible hunting. At a certain point, he simply made it known the topic of Bohemia was completely unwelcome conversation.

That was, until he was met by the Saxon ambassador who informed him Christian had accepted the throne of Bohemia and was asking England's assistance in securing it against rebels (?) and perhaps hostile foreign powers (?) who might try to come steal his rightful throne away from him. Even for Frederick, who by this point in his long and winding career had endured, and pronounced, far more statements of empty cynicism than any one man ought, this rhetoric was galling. And yet, at the same time, just as he could not afford to ignore the opinions of Madrid and Paris, he could not turn a blind eye to London. The Evil Christmas was just four years prior, and Protestant outrage over his liberality to papists showed no sign of abating.

One of William Stanley, Duke of York's arguments in favor of some measured intervention in Bohemia was precisely was that it would provide an opportunity for this zeal and restlessness to find an outlet on a foreign battlefield, where it would present less danger to England's peace than it would bottled up and at home. And if it were to find some foreign expression, better that be against the Austrian Habsburgs, with whom England had few treaties and even less commerce, than directly against the Spanish in the Low Countries once the Twelve Years Truce ended.

Frederick also recalled how poorly the Saxons generally, and the generalship of their young Elector specifically, had fared during the recent Juelich War. Even if he were to be inclined to submit England to the contest more than he was, he would want better assurances of Saxon military competence than he had seen. But if he delayed, and the Saxon and Bohemian causes came to nothing, or worse, the Spanish and Austrian Habsburgs joined in exterminating the lot of them, his complete indifference to their pleas could take the blame, even in the event Christian's fecklessness and incompetence had been the reason they had lost the war, and he would face Puritan rage of a wholly different order of magnitude than any he had experienced so far.

In the end Frederick, whatever else he shared elsewhere, shared his mind with his queen. Anne had mastered, over the years. the subtlety and discretion to wield political power, without it being noticed and becoming fodder for controversy. And so her advice was simple: Kaiser Rudolf's art collection. Very likely the Saxons would look to part with it, to fund their war. The king could buy it and portray it to his nobles and the English public as a donation to the Bohemian and Saxon cause, without risking English men or treasure. "And," the queen added, "His Most Catholic Majesty cannot say you break your word for buying pictures."

Frederick had to this point been somewhat miserly in his spending on continental art, to Anne's frustration. And it is entirely possible this was her foremost concern, regardless of the argument she chose to advance the matter. Whatever the case, King Frederick I bought the entirety of Rudolf's art collection out of Prague Castle, which was loaded and on barges making their way down the Elbe by the first time the city switched hands during the war.

Today, the Rudolfine Collection of the Queen Anne Gallery, complete with Leonardos and Breughels, occupies the second floor state rooms of the Thameside face of the Palace of Whitehall. And while Queen Anne was correct that Spain would not object enough over the purchase to squander its leverage with Frederick over it, that did not make the international law with respect to the question of whether the Bohemian Estates or King Christian had the legal right to sell it any less vexed. The last request from the Austrian foreign ministry demanding its return was dated February 18, 1995--last Tuesday.
 
Last edited:
I'm very pleased to see this story returning to England for a moment!

That was, until he was met by the Saxon ambassador who informed him Christian had accepted the throne of Bohemia and was asking England's assistance in securing it against rebels (?) and perhaps hostile foreign powers (?) who might try to come steal his rightful throne away from him. Even for Frederick, who by this point in his long and winding career had endured, and pronounced, far more statements of empty cynicism than any one man ought, this rhetoric was galling.

This sort of thing is exactly why I've been missing Frederick, recently.

And while Queen Anne was correct that Spain would not object enough over the purchase to squander its leverage with Frederick over it, that did not make the international law with respect to the question of whether the Bohemian Estates or King Christian had the legal right to sell it any less vexed. The last request from the Austrian foreign ministry demanding its return was dated February 18, 1995--last Tuesday.

It's funny because it's so terribly plausible.

These last two updates have been really enjoyable, thanks!
 
Conde_de_gondomar.jpg

Diego Sarmiento de Acuna, Count of Gondomar, by Jose Maria Calvan y Candela, (19th century)

from Glenda Johnson, The Birth of the Scottish Atlantic

At the time Saxony went to war over the Bohemian throne, with its elector venturing personally into the war-torn country, taking his wife and three small children with him, the Electress Elizabeth was heir to the throne of Scotland. Lest anyone imagine the possibility of her succession was distant or unlikely, given that King Henry was still only 25 years old and in robust health, he had already survived three of the eight assassination attempts that would be made over the course of his reign, most notably the explosion of a barrel loaded with gunpowder next to his carriage while it was stopped on a street in Stirling, an apparent variation on the plot used to kill Henri IV of France in 1610. It turned the carriage on its side, killing the horses and his driver immediately, but left Henry remarkably unhurt.

Thus it could be assumed, natural affection aside, the well-being of the new Queen of Bohemia was of consequence to Scotland, especially given that among the next best claims after Elizabeth's, two belonged to Englishwomen, Margaret and Arabella Seymour, daughters of Arabella Stuart. The lack of other surviving legitimate descendants of James IV, James V, Mary I, and James VI had narrowed the field of potential Scottish monarchs rather remarkably, and Henry's own bloody accession to the throne of Scotland (he was rather upset to hear the word usurpation) had thinned out the field of potential Scottish monarchs still further.

And as to that natural affection, we are somewhat uncertain as to how strong it was at this point. As children, Henry and Elizabeth had shown great fondness for each other, and their inseparability during Elector Christian's remarkable visit to Scotland in 1613 seemed born from real enjoyment of each other's company. But all that had been before Henry had overthrown their father, James VI, perhaps thinking that was the only means to prevent his own murder at the hands of James's favorites. Whether Elizabeth at this stage blamed Henry for their father's death, we do not know.

Precisely because Henry was a king, she was his heir, and she might one day be forced to request armies from him, the tone in her letters from the time of her arrival in Saxony was always polite and deferential, even if perhaps a bit cold in a way that seems inconsistent to the behavior exhibited while she, Henry and Christian were galloping through the Scottish countryside around Linlithgow together. But in late 1619 came Elizabeth's first plea for help with the matter of Bohemia.

Its tone was both epic and personal. It spoke of her and her husband's calling to liberate an oppressed people and to vindicate true religion. It spoke to Henry's own faith, and held out the possibility brother and sister might see each other again, in the beautiful and ancient capital of a kingdom they had all freed together to their mutual honor, and the benefit of the entire world. It was a document so stuffed with amiable dreams it might qualify as a romance. The young Elizabeth can sometimes come off as a buffoonish creature, with her refusal to learn German or Czech, her revealing French dresses and her immodest behavior with her emphatically interested husband. But you already see in that letter her skill as a budding diplomat and propagandist.

Eventually, Elizabeth's correspondence, as Electress, then Queen, and then finally, Dowager Queen, to family members, heads of state, their ministers, high and low nobility, prelates, merchants, tutors, tradesmen who had swindled her, tradesmen she had swindled, philosophers, artists, actors, moneylenders, generals, city fathers, servants, prison wardens, unsavory admirers, and the angry parents of casualties who had died in her war, would run to twelve volumes. Each document therein, which she composed personally even when it was subsequently translated, whether addressed to the Ottoman Caliph, the Tsar of Muscovy, or one of her children's nursemaids who had taken ill, is supremely aware of its purpose and audience. And even in 1619, at barely 22, the young Elizabeth knew her business well.

A shame, then, it was no more effective than it was. Henry's reply made no mention of saving the world, or his own soul. And really it did not seem that interested in saving Elizabeth, even. It made mention of Scotland's poverty relative to Saxony, averred there would have to be some deferral of the huge expense of transferring any substantial number of soldiers from Scotland to the Continent in order for Scotland to participate at all in the war, and worried over the possibility that England might use the opportunity of his absence to invade--always a possibility! In short, the Scottish king announced, more practical discussions would have to be held, especially as to the matter of money. Then, perhaps, Scottish assistance of some kind to Saxony could be considered. All that was missing to make the point clear was the dreaded benediction "Best wishes in all your future endeavors."

Elizabeth of course would periodically repeat her plea to Henry, sometimes in much direr circumstances than she at that point in 1619 imagined possible, and her tone was always unfailingly respectful and even affectionate. Only once did her mask of courtly deference slip, and it was in person at her court rather than on the page to her brother. Decades hence, when one of Erste's secretaries asked her to consider how likely her brother would be to take a given side in an international dispute, Elizabeth exclaimed savagely "Why sir, I do think that if the enemy to be conquered is anything more threatening than a single, frail, fearful old man, His Majesty will have no taste for it."

Of course this was not the end of the saga of whether King Henry of Scotland would take sides in the First General War. In the declining months of 1620, with full scale war in the Empire raging and Spain having just waded in to support its Austrian Habsburg cousins, Spain's powerful ambassador to England, Diego Sarmiento de Acuna, Count of Gondomar, arrived in Edinburgh for talks with Henry I. Spanish ambassador at Frederick's court for ten years and himself a veteran of the long Anglo-Spanish War of the 16th century, Gondomar had a dazzling record of success sweet-talking Protestant kings. Henry's Scottish publicists describe this as a kind of triumph. Following the foreign policy success of his Long Ride and the negotiation of his marriage to Henrietta Maria, a Spanish embassy had come to pay respects to this savvy young king at the corner of the world.

In truth, the Spanish were most concerned about the Scottish practice of "cousining," which is to say Scottish ships sneaking into Spanish colonial ports under English flags and with English papers so as to fraudulently enjoy the benefits of the English pas. At the Leith docks, the Count of Gondomar saw illegal merchandise--sugar from the West Indies--being unloaded. On the Royal Mile, he passed shops openly selling forgeries of the documentation necessary for English ships to sail into Spanish ports. And he met at Holyrood a king dressed in new green velvet who knew nothing about any of it, and who claimed he could not be held any more personally responsible for it than for the activities of cutpurses on his streets.

Inevitably, the Spanish envoys turned to the matter of the human catastrophe unfolding on the continent. Did Scotland have intentions to intervene on behalf of his sister and brother-in-law? Did the terms of Elizabeth's marriage to Christian provide for a military alliance? Were there terms in the new treaty with France pertaining to the war in the Empire? Henry I answered, with some emotion, that he despaired over his sister's safety, and that of her husband who was himself his own dear friend, and their small children, who were, like Elizabeth herself, his heirs, given that he as yet had none of his body. He said he dared not divulge specifics to the Spanish diplomats because the interests of their kingdom was of course adverse to those of the Saxons, but Henry stated confidently that there but a few details to be worked out before Scotland would enter the war on the side of the Protestant Union, and that it would so so with a sizeable enough commitment to decide the question quickly and restore peace to Christendom.

At this point, the somewhat unsettled Gondomar asked whether any inducement was possible which could persuade Henry, not to ignore the safety of his dear sister, certainly, but perhaps to provide time for a diplomatic solution to be worked out among the existing parties so that loss of life of his Scottish subjects could be avoided? Henry sighed, and answered that it was a lesson learned at the knee of his own dear father that a king must always work for peace. So, the Count of Gondomar continued, though they were unprepared to enter into serious talks on the matter, and had no negotiating authority on this subject, what terms might persuade Henry to forego Scotland's entrance into the war?

As it turned out the Scottish king had actually given the matter extensive thought. Henry thought Scotland being given its own pas, equivalent in scope and character to the one England enjoyed, would be sufficient. Recalling from accounts of the Anglo-Spanish peace negotiations that Spain's initial objection to England being given the pas was that England was too small and inconsequential a country for such a privilege, and that Frederick's reply had been that if England was inconsequential, then the cost to Spain of it being given it would be inconsequential too, Henry reminded the Spanish that Scotland was much smaller even than England, and so it would be no cost to Spain at all.

Failing that, Henry said that one term of the treaty Scotland had recently entered into with France was an agreement that the two kingdoms' New World colonies not attack each other, or purposefully frustrate each other, wheresoever they were located, so long as they were not established within distance of any settled areas, and that some equivalent terms with Spain would be adequate. This, Gondomar made perfectly clear, was absurd. He declared unambiguously Spain was not going to bestow the pas to avoid a war with a country that had not enjoyed a clear military victory for hundreds of years. And it was likewise not going to give Scotland a license to settle anywhere it wanted in the vast stretches of land it claimed in the New World. These notions were ludicrous.

But rather than betraying any anger at this peremptory refusal, Henry merely smiled and said that he would gladly entertain counteroffers from the Spanish of a more limited and circumscribed nature. This was, of course, he advised, perhaps betraying a bit of the mildness of character ambassadors had noted in James VI, what it meant to negotiate. Ending the audience in indignation, Gondomar's party confidently reported back that not only were Henry's notions fantastically unreasonable, but that as far as they knew there were no Scottish preparations for war at all, and that most likely the Scottish king was trying to extract from Spain a price to not do the thing he had no intention of doing anyway.

Creating the impression of an imminent and sizeable, Scottish expedition would take work. Inquiries were made to England about the possibility of allowing a Scottish army of 20,000 to march peaceably and in good order to Dover, where it would be ferried to France for war in the Low Countries, and which would be provisioned from English merchants on its journey at market rates. Complementarily, inquiries were made to France about allowing a Scottish army of 20,000 to use Calais and Artois as a staging ground for an invasion of the Spanish Netherlands to aid the Dutch and Saxons. Alternately, inquiries were made to the Dutch and Danish about whether, as allies of Saxony, they would transport Scottish forces for free across the North Sea to Hamburg, from which they would ascend the Elbe to Bohemia.

These were all made with the intent that, whether by diplomatic back channels or espionage, word would reach Spain. In fact, we know for certain that word of them did reach Wittenberg and were in fact shared with the Electress, who believed momentarily that her brother was finally preparing to act to save the seriously endangered Saxon war effort. Of course we know, in retrospect, Elizabeth's hopes were doomed to disappointment. Henry I's state papers reveal there was never, to any extent, any intention of participating in the war, only of creating the impression in foreign capitals so that Scotland could extract the greatest possible concessions to maintain its neutrality.

During these same years, it would become well known throughout Midlothian that the occasional visits of foreign ambassadors were a fine way to make more than a week's wages in one day, for the King would hire them all to drill outside his windows even if for a few hours, just to create the impression he was planning imminent wars of conquest abroad.

And of course, objectively, the Spanish ambassadors' first appraisal was objectively right. Henry's demands in 1620 were absurd. Only very gradually, with Spanish defeats, and bankruptcies, and land wars with France, and the sheer depletion of the number of uninvolved outside powers with the resources to substantially affect the outcome of the conflict on which the future of Christendom depended, did they become less absurd, until finally, humiliatingly, the inconceivable talks the Spanish had balked at in 1620 began in earnest.

Of course, it should not be assumed there was no Scottish involvement in the First General War. Scots served both sides, as generals, officers and soldiers, just as they previously had in other European conflicts during the era of mercenary armies which were in their national compositions almost arbitrary in their relationship to whom they fought for. Substantial numbers of Scots had fought in both the initial phases of the Dutch Revolt and the Long Turkish War, and this enabled Scots to climb the chain of command even by the time the General War began. One of them, Alexander Leslie, would eventually be chief of the entire Saxon war effort.

The profound, and increasing, demand for fresh soldiers, and the relative prestige of Scottish soldiers on the battlefield, itself created an opportunity for Henry. Since his accession he had moved to curb the Highland Clans and force modernized land tenures, new royal courts and other reforms, many of them funded by new taxes and impositions on the clans. Catholic holdouts among the great families of the Highlands had especially been squeezed, though Henry had been careful to not press so hard as to trigger open revolt against his rule. Of course, being Henry, he had hoped to weaken the clans by encouraging immigration from among their number to his struggling colonies in the New World. But he also decided to encourage their wartime service in foreign armies.

All King Henry required was a small fee, assessed based upon land holdings, for a man to leave Scotland to enter foreign military service. It operated under the rationale that by leaving the country to offer their service to foreigners, these men could not offer it to their king, and so this was a contribution towards hiring their replacements. It was set high enough so that it would be a fresh source of revenue for a king always looking for one, low enough that it would not actually dissuade disaffected Highlanders from leaving the country to go fight, whether that would be for or against the King of Spain, or for against Henry's brother-in-law the Elector of Saxony, or any other party to the conflict. All that mattered was, as always, the King of Scotland got his part.
 
Last edited:
It’s fascinating I think, that Henry I’s attitude parallels that of his father’s OTL when James I was faced with the Bohemian Revolt. It’s particularly notable however that whereas James was naively aiming for peace that Henry is instead more cynical and self-serving.
 
It’s fascinating I think, that Henry I’s attitude parallels that of his father’s OTL when James I was faced with the Bohemian Revolt. It’s particularly notable however that whereas James was naively aiming for peace that Henry is instead more cynical and self-serving.

Actually, I low-key kinda love that both our British monarchs, who in different ways define themselves against James VI and strive to be his opposite, in this matter come out more or less with the same position he adopted. In fact one way to conceptualize it is that James was also trying to drive the best possible deal with Spain, only he was thinking of it dynastically, in terms of the match with his heir, rather than in other things he might want to get. It's always an interesting question of priority: in these people's minds, what's the first thing they're managing, what's the primary loyalty, what's the entity, first and foremost, they're trying to make great? In James's case, probably it's the House of Stuart, rather than England, Scotland, or the novel combination of the two.

By the way, one of the more interesting details in the biography of Elizabeth Stuart I read (years ago now) preparing for just this work is the subtle tension in her relationship with her father over the matter of English intervention in favor of the Palatinate. There's never a direct break, nor could there be, and for good reason, given that before all is said and done, the Winter Queen would be dependent on charity from her brother and nephew.

Still, one measure of that tension is the child names. Elizabeth Stuart named her sons Henry Frederick, Charles, Rupert, Maurice, Louis, Edward, Philip Frederick, and yes, Gustavus Adolphus (not much chance of that last one in our timeline, watch this space). You have to work hard to have that many sons, and not name at least one after your father. Especially a father you happen to be constantly asking for money. In this timeline, you will note she and Christian have not named a child after her brother, perhaps displaying some of the hard feelings she has around TTL James VI's end.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I low-key kinda love that both our British monarchs, who in different ways define themselves against James VI and strive to be his opposite, in this matter come out more or less with the same position he adopted. In fact one way to conceptualize it is that James was also trying to drive the best possible deal with Spain, only he was conceptualizing it dynastically, in terms of the match with his heir, rather than in other things he might want to get.

By the way, one of the more interesting details in the biography of Elizabeth Stuart I read (years ago now) preparing for just this work is the subtle tension in her relationship with her father over the matter of English intervention in favor of the Palatinate. There's never a direct break, nor could there be, and for good reason, given that before all is said and done, the Winter Queen would be dependent on charity from her brother and nephew.

Still, one measure of that tension is the child names. Elizabeth Stuart named her sons Henry Frederick, Charles, Rupert, Maurice, Louis, Edward, Philip Frederick, and yes, Gustavus Adolphus (not much chance of that last one in our timeline, watch this space). You have to work hard to have that many sons, and not name at least one after your father. Especially a father you happen to be constantly asking for money. In this timeline, you will note she and Christian have not named a child after her brother, perhaps displaying some of the hard feelings she has around TTL James VI's end.
In regards to child names, though this is a bit outdated relative to where the timeline currently is, who was the elector Alexander named for? The Holy Prince was for his uncle Fredreich the Wise and Christian was for King Christian IV. The only closely related Alexander would his maternal cousin the Duke of Ross but he died in 1515 as an infant OTL so it seems unlikely he was named after him.

Edit: just found the answer to my question in post 84 “in fact Friedrich had named him for a penurious Scottish maternal cousin who had entered Saxon military service and distinguished himself at Dueren”. This does however raise another interesting point regarding the Scottish sucession in that the ATL Alexander would have to die at Dueren in order for his niece Mary to become Queen of Scots as Scotland practiced semi-Salic succession. It does seem odd though that the male heir to the throne of Scotland would be allowed to leave the country and enter foreign military service, especially given that James V spent so long without a heir of his body.
 
Last edited:
In regards to child names, though this is a bit outdated relative to where the timeline currently is, who was the elector Alexander named for? The Holy Prince was for his uncle Fredreich the Wise and Christian was for King Christian IV. The only closely related Alexander would his maternal cousin the Duke of Ross but he died in 1515 as an infant OTL so it seems unlikely he was named after him.

Edit: just found the answer to my question in post 84 “in fact Friedrich had named him for a penurious Scottish maternal cousin who had entered Saxon military service and distinguished himself at Dueren”. This does however raise another interesting point regarding the Scottish sucession in that the ATL Alexander would have to die at Dueren in order for his niece Mary to become Queen of Scots as Scotland practiced semi-Salic succession. It does seem odd though that the male heir to the throne of Scotland would be allowed to leave the country and enter foreign military service, especially given that James V spent so long without a heir of his body.

So, the short answer to your question was going to be "illegitimate." Literally, and this was what was going on in my head way back when I wrote post 84, the idea is that James IV had a natural child who had made it to Saxony. And the thing about James IV is, he had no shortage of those. When young Margaret Tudor arrived in Scotland she was apparently taken to Stirling Castle to meet them all, and by this point James was only maybe thirty or so, so the clear implication was that he had been very busy, and that did not go well at all.

However, if this Alexander is indeed a cousin, which is to say a blood relation, that would seem to imply they are related through the maternal side, which is to say Margaret, and not James, wouldn't it? Which is to say, not illegitimate. A thoughtless error on my part. Unless we mean cousin in that more capacious sense by which everyone in Europe of a certain birth is a cousin.

But this still seems oddly specific, doesn't it? I mean, where was I going with this?

I was wanting to build a line of descendants of this Alexander Stuart who would be involved in the military and have significance in the First General War.

However, then I found Alexander Leslie, the real-life historical person who served in the Dutch Revolt and went on to be one of Gustavus Adolphus's top lieutenants in the 30YW. That he would enter the service of Saxony because they probably pay better and are desperate for military talent makes perfect sense. And Alexander Leslie, with no family connection, is also going to be part of one of the more significant subplots we have doing on in the next short while, which is growing dissatisfaction with treating the military as the playpen of the aristocracy when the consequences of less than completely competent generalship is dire for the whole country.

As to the throwaway line about Alexander's naming, I have no idea what I should do. In the very very very first incarnation of all this, the name Alexander was very much part of that fashion in the real sixteenth century HRE for the grandiose and pagan: Joachim Hector, Albrecht Alcibiades, Julius. It still fits right in. I might just go back and nip that line about the cousin right out completely.
 
So, the short answer to your question was going to be "illegitimate." Literally, and this was what was going on in my head way back when I wrote post 84, the idea is that James IV had a natural child who had made it to Saxony. And the thing about James IV is, he had no shortage of those. When young Margaret Tudor arrived in Scotland she was apparently taken to Stirling Castle to meet them all, and by this point James was only maybe thirty or so, so the clear implication was that he had been very busy, and that did not go well at all.

However, if this Alexander is indeed a cousin, which is to say a blood relation, that would seem to imply they are related through the maternal side, which is to say Margaret, and not James, wouldn't it? Which is to say, not illegitimate. A thoughtless error on my part. Unless we mean cousin in that more capacious sense by which everyone in Europe of a certain birth is a cousin.

But this still seems oddly specific, doesn't it? I mean, where was I going with this?

I was wanting to build a line of descendants of this Alexander Stuart who would be involved in the military and have significance in the First General War.

However, then I found Alexander Leslie, the real-life historical person who served in the Dutch Revolt and went on to be one of Gustavus Adolphus's top lieutenants in the 30YW. That he would enter the service of Saxony because they probably pay better and are desperate for military talent makes perfect sense. And Alexander Leslie, with no family connection, is also going to be part of one of the more significant subplots we have doing on in the next short while, which is growing dissatisfaction with treating the military as the playpen of the aristocracy when the consequences of less than completely competent generalship is dire for the whole country.

As to the throwaway line about Alexander's naming, I have no idea what I should do. In the very very very first incarnation of all this, the name Alexander was very much part of that fashion in the real sixteenth century HRE for the grandiose and pagan: Joachim Hector, Albrecht Alcibiades, Julius. It still fits right in. I might just go back and nip that line about the cousin right out completely.
Thank you for clarifying that point. I agree that the name Alexander was perfectly in fashion, I had just wondered if he was named for anyone closely related much like his predecessor and successor were. I look forward to your excellent narration of the First General War. One interesting thing I suppose is where Bohemia will end up at the end of all of this since I’m assuming it will not be part of the second realm (which has the borders of Weimar Germany in the modern day I think).
 
Top