MarshalBraginsky
Banned
Lately I've been pondering on the scenario of "What if Wladyslaw IV Vasa becomes Tsar of Russa?" and there were several factors that made this impossible, namely:
- Sigismund's Catholic stance and his ambition to become the Catholic Tsar of Russia, which made the idea of making his son Wladyslaw Tsar pointless.
- There were several other potential candidates like the False Dmitrys, even the Swedes threw in Charles Philip Vasa as their own candidate before Mikhail Romanov became the founding leader of the Romanov dynasty.
Now Wladyslaw took the Russian crown on July 19, 1610 while the Siege of Smolensk was still happening and did not end until 1611. So within this time period between Wladyslaw's selection and the end of the Siege of Smolensk, Sigismund gets killed, say by a stray shot, falls off his horse or suffers a fatal wound while in close quarters combat. Because Wladyslaw might be too young to rule by himself, who would be the regent for him and who gets to succeed Sigismund if his children are too young?
- Sigismund's Catholic stance and his ambition to become the Catholic Tsar of Russia, which made the idea of making his son Wladyslaw Tsar pointless.
- There were several other potential candidates like the False Dmitrys, even the Swedes threw in Charles Philip Vasa as their own candidate before Mikhail Romanov became the founding leader of the Romanov dynasty.
Now Wladyslaw took the Russian crown on July 19, 1610 while the Siege of Smolensk was still happening and did not end until 1611. So within this time period between Wladyslaw's selection and the end of the Siege of Smolensk, Sigismund gets killed, say by a stray shot, falls off his horse or suffers a fatal wound while in close quarters combat. Because Wladyslaw might be too young to rule by himself, who would be the regent for him and who gets to succeed Sigismund if his children are too young?