Scandinavian countries 'sanity' options - 1935-1940

It is a bit more tricky than just looking at materiel.

Denmark:
Flat and easy tank-country. Airforce with Gloster Gladiators, etc.

But more importantly: The political will to defend and take serious casualties were not there

Norway:
Very much different. Country not so easy.
Political will to defend was surely there

Sweden:
Neautral - and having a great income from exporting iron ore to Germany.
Their security might have been their 'semi-alignment' with Germany?

None of the countries might have stood a chance against a more massive invasion. BUT - the allocation of forces were 'adequate' but not huge in the bigger picture.

Anyone?
 
Top