I know its been a while, but here's the next part. I plan to at least finish the parts about the war, time permitting me.
Events To Wilmington Peace Conference
President Fillmore designs upon coming to office were very clear; to end the war preferably with the southern states returning to the Union. With this in mind, Fillmore had no intention of continuing an unpopular war against a seemingly unbeatable opponent. His pre-Wilmington Conference goals were to assure the AS of the US’ peaceful intentions by demobilizing a large percent of the military and strictly adhering to the ceasefire agreement. Fillmore believed that if the late conflict could be written off as “Mr. Taylor’s War” and not as a war of the Federal government that the south would rejoin the US with appropriate concessions – up and including amendments to the constitution regarding states’ rights, popular sovereignty and slavery in the Mexican Cession (1). Basically, Fillmore was willing to give in to all pre-war Southern demands in order to maintain the Union.
By November, 1851 the US army had expanded to 250,000 men and the navy to 60,000. Slightly more then half of the armed forces had seen combat in some form. The remaining soldiers where either waiting deployment, on garrison duty or still in training by the enacting of the ceasefire. Upon assuming the presidency Fillmore immediately ordered the military to stop all recruitment for the army, navy or marines. On November 10th, after the ceasefire agreement, Fillmore released all soldiers who had been recruited “for the duration” of the war and all of those not yet fully trained – about 85,000 men. On November 17th he terminated the enlistments of soldiers in units that had suffered over one-third causalities during the war, nearly halving the combat strength of the Army of the Potomac. These measures reduced the US army’s strength to fifty percent of the 250,000 of the previous month. The navy was a similar story with most of the ships from the blockade having their recently recruited sailors dismissed and nearly all of commandeered US ships returned to their owners. The navy’s demobilized even faster than the army with 2/3 of wartime navy, both ships and sailors, released from service by January 1, 1852.
The AS armed forces were not so pacifistic, possibly because the War Department considered the resumption of fighting as a strong possibility. After the signing of the ceasefire the War Department stopped all national recruitment and prohibited further bounties for recruits previously offered from government funds. The War Department, at Berrien’s request, also stopped any increase in size of the Provisional Allied Army. This meant that all further volunteers or privately raised units could only be augmentations to the state militia forces – a tactic that allowed an increase of Border States’ militia forces. These efforts stopped Allied military growth, but the Provisional Allied Army remained mobilized in its entirety and even extended enlistments during the ceasefire and peace negotiations. The total strength of the Provisional Allied Army was 80,000 at the time of the ceasefire and remained that strength until the finalizing of peace negotiations. The combined number of the various state militias of the seceded states remained around 50,000 until the enacting of the ceasefire. However, after the ceasefire the number in the various state militias increased to nearly double the pre-ceasefire number by January 1, 1851 (2). For the most part the various Allied field armies withdrew from the states named in the ceasefire agreement, but remained fully mobilized and close to state borders. Jefferson Davis’ Army of Northern Virginia remained in Philadelphia and only withdrew on December 4th after news reached them that peace negotiations had begun. The Allied Navy, never having more then 10,000 men, also remained entirely operational, but stayed close to port – mainly because its navy was made up of a handful of coastal-defense ships and a far smaller number of government-paid blockade-runners.
The Union was not nearly as passive in the Border States as Fillmore would have wanted. By mid-November the US Army and AS Army had withdrawn from their respective occupied areas in Maryland, Kentucky, Delaware and Missouri as per the ceasefire agreement. Despite this, plentiful amounts of weapons were left and the Unionist governors kept their respective militias mobilized. These actions in support of state governments were taken by commanders in the field without Fillmore’s approval or knowledge. In western Maryland, Unionist militia in the Allied-controlled state refused to accept Governor Lowe authority, remained armed and continued to call themselves the Maryland State Militia. The AS responded by arming Allied-supporting militias in other states: the Bluegrass Guard in central Kentucky and the Missouri State Guard in Missouri. There was a real threat of mini-civil wars within most of the Border States. The only state that maintained a single, universally recognized government was strongly-Unionist Delaware.
Nowhere was closer to statewide civil war then Missouri. On November 15th unseated governor and Southern-sympathizer Sterling Price left for Jefferson City after receiving word of the ceasefire after months of exile in Arkansas. Most of the Allied-loyal Missouri State Guard, which had been fighting in Arkansas and Kentucky, reentered the state as well after being driven out with the Governor months before. Price, considering himself the legal governor, went back to the governor’s mansion – until days before used by the recently-departed Union military governor – and began assuming the functions of governor. The weak, Union-appointed Governor, David Patterson, did not contest Price’s resumption of power, but continued to act as governor and dispense his duties. Both Unionist and Allies maintained respective militia in their respective areas; St Louis and central part of the state for the Union and Jefferson City and the extreme south of the state for the Allies.
Patterson, under heavy Union pressure, tried to close the Southern border with Arkansas with the Unionist state militia. Price counter-manned his order and ordered his militia to seal borders with the Union and secure the capital. This conflict could have led to outright bloodshed if not for the actions of Major Thomas Quantrill. Major Quantrill, a native Ohioan and commander of one of the four Unionist Missouri regiments in Jefferson City, received word that Price was preparing to call in 2,000 men, adding to the 1,500 already in the city, to establish complete control of the state capital. Quantrill immediately took his men and arrested Price at his residence on November 27th. Major Quantrill and the Union garrison evacuated Jefferson City for St. Louis with the detained Governor Price in custody. Without Price the Missouri State Guard found itself without a commander when it peaceable entered Jefferson City. Once Price’s captivity became known the Missouri State Guard arrested Governor Patterson – his absence actually buttressed Unionism within the state. The Guard was preparing to march on St. Louis for a potentially bloody battle, but terms of the Wilmington Peace Treaty reached both sides on December 24th undermining the need for battle.
Wilmington Peace Conference
The Wilmington Peace Conference began on December 2, 1851 in Wilmington, Delaware. The USA was represented by the reconciliatory and well-known Senator Stephan Douglas and recent Fillmore-appointee as Secretary of State, New Jersey attorney and ex-Senator Theodore Frelinghuysen. Both Frelinghuysen and Douglas had been moderates “hawks,” but strong Unionists despite greatly divergent political views. Frelinghuysen was a Whig from a prominent family, a friend of the deceased Henry Clay as well as friend of Zachary Taylor and of the current President Fillmore, and a highly respected attorney. Douglas, a prominent Democratic Senator from Illinois, had been a hawk at the beginning of the war, but developed a strong anti-Taylor view and openly spoke against Taylor in Congress. Taylor is known to have debated either removing or arresting Douglas, but Douglas prominence made that impossible. However, both these men were committed to the better interests of the US and opposed secession as unconstitutional.
Representing the ASA was ex-North Carolina governor and current Senator, William A. Graham, and the Allied Secretary of State Alexander H. Stephens. Graham and Stephens pasts and views reflected a good deal of the Allied leadership. Both had been Whigs, Stephens even campaigned for Taylor, and both had been angered by Taylor’s actions during his Presidency and felt justified in leaving the service of the US government for the ASA. Stephens, who had begun his political career as a moderate, but drifted towards sectionalism, had been a compromiser and a Unionist until Taylor sent troops into South Carolina. Stephens had always been a stench supporter of “Southern Rights,” but had been an anti-Secessionist until the end of the Milledgeville Convention in 1850. Graham, a well-liked and politically-connected man throughout the former US, was by all definitions a moderate and may have even been a closest Unionist up until the implementing of the blockade on the Allied State and the “Burning of the Shenandoah,” two events that galvanized most Allied politicians. Stephens and Graham may not have been completely happy to see the Southern states leave the Union, but were strongly believed in their cause’s righteousness.
Within a week of the beginning of the conference it became clear to both delegations that the South would not rejoin the Union except by force, something that had proven incredibly unlikely during the late civil war. Although loath to do it, both Frelinghuysen and Douglas agreed that the bases of any peace treaty would be the creation of two separate and independent countries within the boundaries of what had been the United States of America. The Union delegation also agreed to the core area of the new state to comprise Virginia down to Florida to Texas.
Next came the issue of the Border States; the Union wanted to keep Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware and Missouri for sure and Tennessee and Arkansas if possible while the South wanted to expand as much as possible. In exchange for Tennessee and Arkansas the South agreed to give up claims to Delaware, which had given almost no support to the South, and a promise not to harm or prosecute Unionists in East Tennessee or in Arkansas nor to restrict or penalize any citizen of those two states that decided to move to within the borders of the US. The issue of Kentucky, Missouri and Maryland remained difficult, but Douglas, always favoring the will of the people, offered to let Kentucky and Missouri vote in a referendum as to which nation they would belong to and was quickly agreed to by Stephens and Graham.
The Allied Delegation wanted the idea of a referendum expanded to Maryland where Allied support was strong as a confirmation of the State’s secession as per Maryland’s secession ordinance. Douglas was willing to agree, but Frelinghuysen vigorously opposed it as he believed the Union had already given up to much and was abandoning to many Unionists in states that were barely, if at all, Allied-leaning. He demanded that if Maryland was to have a referendum then so should all of the upper South, including the State of Appalachia as a separate unit from Virginia. Stephens rejected the separating of Appalachia from Virginia, but backed down form allowing Maryland to be decided by one referendum and proposed a county-by-county bases that would allow the creation of two separate states in Maryland. This would mean a strong likelihood for an Allied enclave for Baltimore, but possible not cut off Washington from Union control. Frelinghuysen agreed to this as a compromise, but only if Virginia had the same country-by-county vote. Realizing that Baltimore was more important than hilly western Virginia, the Allied delegation agreed to allow the State of Appalachia to remain part of the US without a referendum, but an exchange for a county-by-county vote in Maryland. The guarantee of protection or peaceful relocation for Unionists and Secessionists was extended to all of the Border States; including Virginia, Appalachia, Kentucky, Missouri and Maryland.
The last territorial issues had to do with Washington, DC, the western frontier and negotiations for border adjustments with Mexico. It was assumed that who ever controlled the counties around DC and Maryland would effectively control the former US capitol and both sides agreed that whoever won the counties bordering DC would receive the capitol and the other side would receive financial compensation. Again, Frelinghuysen had opposed this move, but had agreed for a better deal in the West. In the West, were the Allied military had been defeated by superior US forces, the biggest natural boundary, the Rio Grande was decided as the best border for the two countries and the already defined northern border of Texas would be continued to the river as the new border in the Plains. All negations between a foreign power and either of the two American nations that involved federal acts before 1850 would be made with a delegate from the other nation has full partner. Any costs would be split evenly.
The next and final issues were national debt, the division of Federal property (ships, armaments, land and buildings), compensation for damage down against private citizens by both armies, and trade. Both delegations know the division of Federal property would be a long-term, expensive and ultimately unproductive venture. Besides this the Allied delegation, especially Stephens, feared that the new nation’s national debt would be devastating on the AS’s trade-based economy. Both delegations agreed that the AS government would retain all Federal property located on its territory will the US government would retain the rest in exchange for the US paying 2/3 of the Federal debt. In return for resumption of the majority of the national debt, the US got a guarantee of eternal and permanent free trade on the Ohio and Mississippi river. A joint commission was to be set-up to decide damages for both sides would have to pay, but the payments would be directly to individuals as opposed to governments.
After nearly three weeks of negations both delegations signed the treaty and all its provisions were to be enacted within six months of the ratification by both governments. Douglas and Frelinghuysen were disappointed at their numerous failures, but they were negotiating with a nation that had clearly defeated their own and hoped that the numerous referendums would give the nation breathing space and force a weak South to come to its senses. In fact, Stephens and Graham were also disappointed having failed to gain the entirety of the slaveholding South and facing the very real change that debt incurred from both the treaty and war would crush the nation’s economy. There was also the lingering fear that the treaty might be rejected by the Allied Congress because of the loss of land by both Virginia and Texas, two very important states. Frelinghuysen feared that it would cause his own Whig Party to implode and allow Democratic-domination of Congress. Both sides left with much less then they hoped and deep fear for the future of their nations.
--------------------------
(1)From Fillmore’s private letters published as “The Letters of President Milliard Fillmore” ed. Stephen D. Connolly
(2)These overwhelming upper-class late joiners, commonly called the gay-feet, joined either to share in the glory of having “served” or to remove shame that would have been brought on their families from having not. According to Etymology of Political Terms in the Modern World by Adolph Eriksson, this term purportedly comes from a popular Richmond editor, George K. Johnson, who supposedly said “They [these late recruits] are all too gay to run to the army when the war is over.” This quote has never been found in any surviving written source pre-1860 and we can only assume its origins. At this time “gay” often had scandalous or immoral connotations.