That is a mighty big chunk of Ukraine that Putin's gobbled up.
If I might speculate on the map above, based on the fact that "Russian Ukraine" has Kiev and only the most Western Ukrainian regions are not part of the Kiev administration, I am going to guess that rather than Putin gobbling up Ukraine what happened was that Ukraine had a succession of pro-Russian presidents from 2000 onwards (so no Orange Revolution?) moving the nation closer and closer to Moscow until at one point the more nationalist and pro-E.U. Western regions of the country decided to break off and form their own "True Ukraine" or something -- so basically the inverse of the "People's Republic of Donetsk" that some want to see happen OTL. It's an interesting idea, I'll give you that. Lvov/Lviv would be the natural place to have the capital of West Ukraine. Of course, without the industry of the east West Ukraine would be in worse economic shape than OTL Ukraine...
Anyway, this is of course all conjecture on my part.
P.S.: it is also interesting to speculate, based on the fact that Belarus isn't in Russia's sphere, that while Ukraine's Orange Revolution either failed or was butterflied away Belarus' own
Jeans Revolution might have been a success.
It's still crazy that Russia would have Iraq as a de facto member state AND still have friendly relations with Iran, Syria, etc. No way, no how. Russia being allowed to expand south into the Middle East is borderline ASB.
I'm willing to see where the author is going with this. We know that there was no 2003 war but that does not mean that Saddam is still ruling Iraq in 2024 (the year of the map). For all we know someone who is friendly to Iran and Syria is in charge.
Also, China is not going to like Russia meddling with North Korea, that is their backyard and if they think the regime is leaning the other way they will absolutely intervene and set up a more tractable puppet.
You do know that throughout the Cold War North Korea played both Soviets and Chinese of off each other for aid and whatnot, right?