Persia didn't convert to Islam right after the conquest, with Zoroastrianism having a great-ish number of followers until (at least) the 11th Century. Zoroastrian rebellions took place in Tabaristan, where the Caliph had little control and several Zoroastrian dynasties ruled until the 9th Century (and, AFAIK, their conversion was more political than anything).
So, with the Anarchy at Samarra throwing the Caliphate in disarray, could the Zoroastrian communities in Tabaristan and what today is Turkmenistan reorganize, resist the Muslims and eventually take Persia back? The Zoroastrian population was, AFAIK, still majority in that area, and maybe a large enough uprising could force the Bavandids (who converted to Sunni Islam just 20 years before) to convert back to Zoroastrianism.
So, is this plausible at all?
So, with the Anarchy at Samarra throwing the Caliphate in disarray, could the Zoroastrian communities in Tabaristan and what today is Turkmenistan reorganize, resist the Muslims and eventually take Persia back? The Zoroastrian population was, AFAIK, still majority in that area, and maybe a large enough uprising could force the Bavandids (who converted to Sunni Islam just 20 years before) to convert back to Zoroastrianism.
So, is this plausible at all?