So it seems like having Mackensen or Francois instead of Hindenburg probably doesn't change much as far as World War I goes. If we assume roughly the same course - Germany defeated in 1918, end of the monarchy, all that - without Hindenburg, who becomes the right wing candidate for president in 1925?
So it seems like having Mackensen or Francois instead of Hindenburg probably doesn't change much as far as World War I goes. If we assume roughly the same course - Germany defeated in 1918, end of the monarchy, all that - without Hindenburg, who becomes the right wing candidate for president in 1925?
While I agree that a CP loss is still more likely than not I think this simplifies WW1 too much.
Ludendorff's rise through the German Army ranks during WW1 is close to ASB. I think that Hindenburg being dead would probably not allow Ludendorff to become the defacto leader of Germany in 1917 (after Falkenhayn and Bethmann-Hollweg are gone).
And that is a very significant change to OTL if you ask me.
While I agree that a CP loss is still more likely than not I think this simplifies WW1 too much.
Ludendorff's rise through the German Army ranks during WW1 is close to ASB. I think that Hindenburg being dead would probably not allow Ludendorff to become the defacto leader of Germany in 1917 (after Falkenhayn and Bethmann-Hollweg are gone).
And that is a very significant change to OTL if you ask me.
Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz maybe ? He was very a nationalist DNVP politican after his military career. ( Although he dies in 1930 OTL)
Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck , due to his popularity ? I assume, that he is very conservative, too.
,How about Mackensen himself? If he enjoys the same national adulation that Hindenburg did, he should be electable.
One point. Mackensen lived until 1945, so Hitler (if still appointed) would have to co-exist with him a lot longer than with Hindenburg - or else, as I rather fear, arrange a tragic accident.