Yes, Prussia is independent. That is a good point, but I think it could work if done the right way.Max Sinister said:Rename the Swabian Union into South German Union. Is Prussia independent on your map? And I doubt the Dutch would like the idea of a federation with the "moffen" so short after the war. Especially since they'd be outnumbered.
Well, they missed Austria then...
I didn't know that plan. It's interesting, thanks.Easy, take the Roosevelt Plan for Germany instead of what happened OTL.
I can't. Belgium is on the winning side too.Expand Luxembourg to have the Luxembourgish speaking parts of Belgium
Agreed. When Dutch and French borders move eastwards it's only natural that Belgium and Luxembourg would match their neighbours' advance.along with easstward to old parts of the Grand Duchy. Have Belgium also move a bit.
Ah! But would the Swiss accept them? In 1919, even though more than 80% of Voralbergers voted to join Switzeraland, their membership was denied thanks to opposition from French- and Italian-speaking Swiss.Have the area surrounded by Switzerland join the Swiss, which they had wanted to.
Sorry for reopening this old thread but I found fascinating the idea that the Allies would try to split Germany in order to create "Austrias" within old Germany. This could kill the concept of a German nationality demoting it to a looser kinship concept similiar to the concept of being Nordic or South Slav. Additionally, each country's local dialect(s) could be promoted alongside - or even instead of - standard German.
Here is an old (somewhat bad quality) map showing my ideas for a German partition. Bavaria returns to being a monarchy, because IIRC the Bavarians wanted the monarchy back post-WW2.
Furthermore the South German Federation is also supposed to contain the Palatine, maybe I missed parts of it out. Also the Saarland might be annexed to France. Otherwise everything should be clear here. North Germany is Finlandized, btw.
If they didn't intend to expel the local population I think there wouldn't be much ethical opposition arising from within Netherlands itself. Would the Allies block it for some reason?I like your Proposal One, but I doubt I'd let the Dutch annex that much of Germany if any of it at all.
Though, there's also no reason I can think of to keep Franconia in Bavaria necessarily.
If they didn't intend to expel the local population I think there wouldn't be much ethical opposition arising from within Netherlands itself. Would the Allies block it for some reason?
I actually was thinking that Franconia might be split three ways, but in retrospect, you're right to leave it Bavarian.I'm hesitant to remove Franconia from Bavaria. You see, I removed the Bavarian Swabia because it had a place to go. Nuremberg has been associated with Bavaria for a while and I don't know what else to do with Franconia.
Yeap, I understood you. Things like that have indeed happened before. After WWI Italy expanded its Lybia at British expense in exchange for not getting a share of the German colonies. I only believe these are rare events.When I mentioned Luxumbourg getting Belgian land earlier, I should have been clear that it was a trade, as most of the popuation of the borderarea spoke Luxembourgish anyways. Plus they had tried to get the British and French to take Cabina or the Zaire province from Portugal after WWI to give to them, despite the being on the same side.
Yeap, I understood you. Things like that have indeed happened before. After WWI Italy expanded its Lybia at British expense in exchange for not getting a share of the German colonies. I only believe these are rare events.
Luxembourgish borders encompassing the whole of the Luxembourgish sprachraum (through Belgium, France and Germany) would be neater though.
On a side note, I'm Portuguese and I never heard about that OTL Belgian proposal you mentioned. Did they have any compensation to Portugal in mind?
Thanks for the feedback, Wendell.
So... after the comments some corrections follow bellow.
Proposition 1: The Dutch get nothing. Now that we're at it, we could see the French Saar either as an outright annexation or as a protectorate as IOTL.
UNfortunately, I got the books involving it from college, and their online catalouge is a bit too large for me to find them from. No, they didn't plan on giving the Portuguese anything, who only got that small triangle of land back. For Luxembourg, they would need to keep the language areas only, as most of their old lands had already been eaten away. Maybe they could also combine with the Mosselle Speaking German areas nearby, where the German speakers who refused to leave Alsace-Lorraine or cooperate with the Nazis/Prussians/Frenchassimilationists could go to keep their colture a bit. Though we should all probably look into the zones of occupation for this, such as having Silesia not be nnexed to Poland but to instead be in the Soviet zone, as they asked. Maybe the island to the south of Sweden could be traded to Denmark so that the Norwegians got their claim to northern Greenland, or to have the island to be used for the Ests fleeing the Soviets. Would even be interesting if there was a "neutral" zone around the border for the various Eastern Europesn who fought against the Soviets(or didn't, the Reds just didn't like minorities or living people of their own ethnicities).
The above East Prussian SSR seems a bit unlikely, but keeping it to a geographical term could be useful.. Danzig would be interesting for the Germans, as would the island near Stettin, though they wouldn't ming Bear Island or Bornholm. Maybe some ASB by having The Sloven March and Burgenland being given to Hungary, and some more Austrian land given to Yugoslavia. And back to zones of occupation for Austria, Italy, and the like. We need to remember how the French got a zone out of the American and British portions, and that the French Zone in Germany was seperated in two, so that America could touch the French border with their zone.
Honestly, I suspect that Saarland would eventually be "reverted" to your Rhenish state anyway, unless the French actively colonized the area. In fact, such a reversion could happen as a result of France convincing the Rhenish state (I'd call it Hesse/Hessia or Greater Hesse myself) to go along with its broader foreign policy goals. Perhaps in this timeline, the drive for a European Coal and Steel Community is always more contained and results in a "Confederation of the Rhine" involving France, the low countries, and this westernmost German state. Such an entity could be based in Saarbrücken.
Honestly, I suspect that Saarland would eventually be "reverted" to your Rhenish state anyway, unless the French actively colonized the area. In fact, such a reversion could happen as a result of France convincing the Rhenish state (I'd call it Hesse/Hessia or Greater Hesse myself) to go along with its broader foreign policy goals. Perhaps in this timeline, the drive for a European Coal and Steel Community is always more contained and results in a "Confederation of the Rhine" involving France, the low countries, and this westernmost German state. Such an entity could be based in Saarbrücken.