I mean more the Armenians and Georgians decide to ethnically cleanse the land they want in the region, then the Ottomans are kind of forced of forced to go along as you can't change a horse mid race, sure they they can trial their leaders for war crimes but a war to liberate them means they have chosen a side of Caucasian, which puts them against others like the Azeri's which have had bitter relations since the Armenian–Tatar massacres of 1905–07 and the Georgians with Georgian–Ossetian conflict beginning in 1917 following the the February revolution in the OTL.China has an interesting future ahead
Not really. There's not many the Chinese can do against Britain during this time whilst Britain can bankrupt the Chinese and make their life hell economically
It's a very extreme option yes, and not many are really in favor of it. Independence under Ottoman protection on the other hand is more appealing to many
The Russians did not favor the Christian Georgians and Armenians at all. They were the one of the most worst repressed groups in the Russian Empire.
No not really. The Ottomans are a democracy ittl, and democracies answer to their people. The Ottomans will have to answer to its christian populace around a third of the population if they go conducting ethnic cleansing against the caucasian christians
Partially maybe
the restored portuguese monarchy will have a hard time in front of itself to stabilize thats for sure.
True but still that is a low hanging fruit that i can see politicians use to gain votes and to attack rival who are to lenient toward Russia (even if they are in the same position will do exactly the same but you know it is politic after all). Depend on the situation it maybe a thing that win a vote after all. Nevertheless it will be interesting to see how the government balance this issue out.Neutral is more like it. Like it or not the Russians form a large trading block in the OE. The OE being more economical minded ittl, want them money. So they will keep quiet against Russia as long as the Russians don't do anything against them.
Yes but I'm referring to the Turkish folk hero of around this period.isn't that a tv show?
Prime Minister First Lord of the Treasury Leader of the House of Commons | Austen Chamberlain (Conservative + Liberal Unionist) |
Chancellor of the Exchequer | Stanley Baldwin (Conservative) |
Lord Chancellor | The Viscount Grave (Conservative) |
Lord President of the Council | The Marquess of Salisbury (Conservative) |
Lord Privy Seal | Lord Robert Cecil (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs | Lord Curzon (Conservative) |
Leader of the House of Lords | Lord Curzon (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for Home Department | William Bridgeman. (Conservative) |
First Lord of the Admiralty | Leo Amery (Conservative) |
Civil Lord of the Admiralty | The Marquess of Linlithgow (Conservative) |
Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries | Sir Robert Sanders (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for Air | Sir Samuel Hoare (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for the Colonies | The Duke of Devonshire (Conservative) |
President of the Board of Education | Honorable E. F. L. Wood (Conservative) |
Minister of Health | Neville Chamberlain (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for India | The Viscount Peel (Conservative) |
Minister of Labour | Anderson Barlow (Conservative) |
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster | J.C.C Davidson (Conservative) |
Paymaster-General | Sir William Joynson-Hicks (Conservative) |
Minister of Pensions | George Tryon (Conservative) |
Postmaster General | Sir Laming Worthington-Evans (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for Scotland | The Viscount Novar (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for Ireland | The Earl of Midleton (Liberal Unionist) |
President of the Board of Trade | Sir Philip Lloyd-Greame (Conservative) |
Secretary for Overseas Trade | Albert Buckley (Conservative) |
Secretary for Mines | George Lane-Fox (Conservative) |
Minister for Transport | Sir John Baird (Conservative) |
Secretary of State for War | The Earl of Derby (Conservative) |
Attorney General | Sir Douglas Hogg (Conservative) |
Master of the Horse | The Marquess of Bath (Conservative) |
I suppose that is an appropriate title for the Cabinet that changed the date of the empire.As such the so called Cabinet of the Wondermen continued after the 1918 Ottoman General Elections.”
PartiallyI suppose that is an appropriate title for the Cabinet that changed the date of the empire.
It is partially due to the fact that the CUP and Socialist led Coalition led to the expansion of the suffrage as well as abolition of the Imperial Harem. As the Ottomans industrialized late, they had no qualms about using female labour in their factories, which led to a large pool of female workers in the country. However the Socialists aren't the only ones to gain extra votes. The most benefitted is the CUP, which is a center-right conservative party as you say.A question, since I really don't know anything about this: is that thing about Turkish women breaking to the left historical? If so, why did that happen? My understanding was that in most of the democracies at the time, newly enfranchised women tended to flock to conservative parties.
Jackson has had a very very different career actually. Around the time when we reached the time of 1920, i intend to write short biographies of around 10 politicians of the decade. Jackson will be among them. The political developments of both the Conservatives and Jackson have changed since 1911. For now, that list contains Ali Kemal, Ahmet Riza, Stanley Jackson, Reginald McKenna, John M. Parker, Prince Louis of Lichtenstein. Until then, some 6 or 7 chapters later, as of right now, I cannot give up how Jackson comes to power for plot purposes. Though i do hope i make a good case when the chapter comes out.I'm afraid I just don't buy Jackson becoming leader of the Tories, much less PM. He was only elected to parliament in 1915, and has had absolutely no time to make his way up the ladder- there are literally dozens of senior MPs with established bases in the party and actual experience at the ministerial and cabinet level. I realise you want a Unionist to play with Britain being inspired from the eastern Empires, but that's moving far too fast, far too far.
very trueCollege educated women can move to socialist parties and while many women ,seeing the socialist campaign for women suffrage vote for the left.But I think most women above 45 would vote for Conservatives ,the 40-45 range would be evenly divided among conservatives and liberal while under 40 women would vote for liberals.(there are some exceptions)
they are slowly introducing welfare schemesDo ottoman politicians use welfare schemes in politics ?
it will be interesting no doubt.True but still that is a low hanging fruit that i can see politicians use to gain votes and to attack rival who are to lenient toward Russia (even if they are in the same position will do exactly the same but you know it is politic after all). Depend on the situation it maybe a thing that win a vote after all. Nevertheless it will be interesting to see how the government balance this issue out.
the man will certainly make an appearance.Yes but I'm referring to the Turkish folk hero of around this period.
Hekimoğlu - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
unfortunately no........Franz Ferdinand just can't go out in a car anywhere can he?
Finland by all rights is already devolved. The others, well we'll see...............So is Russia gonna divolve to any more places? Like Finland, Baltic states, Central Asia, etc?
Looking at the tory cabinet list I do wonder what happened to FE SmithPoliticking in the Ottoman Empire and UK, succession in the House of Osman, China reconquers Tibet, and the Italians abolish their monarchy! Thoughts? Predictions?