Rather between a conservative monarchy that wanted to support the Germans but was not in a position to do so and a liberal prime minister whose prime constituency was the middle classes/diaspora Greeks. Securing the survival and well being of Ottoman Greeks was not just a matter of policy it was the vested interest of the very political forces that supported the Greek liberals. From the point the Young Turks start ethnic cleansing them in 1914 options varied from a minimum of saving their lives and as much of their capital as possible hence the negotiations for an exchange of populations in mid 1914 to the maximum of Greek control of the Aegean coast of Asia Minor, after the Ottomans most conveniently entered WW1 putting their collapse into the cards.
If there was a coup it was very clearly on the Royalist side when Constantine first dismissed the elected government, then after fresh elections in May 1915 delayed for several months the formation of a new government by the elected majority and then overthrew for a second time the elected government, that had won a massive majority just a few months before. Nevermind conspiring with Bulgarians, Germans and Austrians behind the back of his own government and after 1916 letting the Bulgarians occupy Greek territory (with none too good effects on the inhabitants).
) for her neutrality in the Balkan war/ to join the war directly. Further with the Ottomans winning it very much looks as if it made the right decision.
