The 617,000 men is as mentioned from the September 1915 mobilization, at which point the Bulgarians had available about 373,000 rifles and 1122 artillery pieces. TTL the Bulgarians have not gained but have neither lost material while they had two more years of peace to continue importing arms. Since I'm not in the mood to go down the Bulgarian army history to see the details and whether loss or gain was higher (damn thing besides needing google translate is also in the wrong alphabet!
) I'd say its reasonable to say they have available as much as they did in OTL 1915.
Not exactly. Around ~100,000 men in ww1 were raised in conquered territories in Bulgarian (formerly Ottoman Northern Thrace) and the Aegean coast.
Did not say it is. By the same token it's likely reasonably close in terms of its order of battle to the one mobilized for WW1... plus the units that were removed from said order of battle during the Balkan wars. Given other commitments but also open sea lanes it should have something in the order of 600,000 men available for operations
600,000 readily available for operations in the balkans yes, with the mobilization of reservists. Around 500,000 men are in the Asian territories (with some 50,000 men in Africa due to mobilization), however the transfer of Asian units will take a lot of time, other than the troops placed in Western Anatolia, which were used in Burgas.
There is a 6 months difference in terms of the Great war. Some notable differences are not unlikely, for example the French by now should have some of the heavy artillery they had on order and probably have their semi-automatic rifle in limited service, both likely nasty surprises to the Germans. By the same token drastic differences in available forces are not very likely for the simple reason there is not enough time.
Not exactly true either. Karl von Bulow as Chief of general staff of Germany, Viktor Dankl as leader of the Austrian Army, French Artillery modernization, Russian depot construction completed, and Smith-Dorrien leading the BEF are all massive changes. The Italians have learned from their failed conquest of Libya as well (which will be expanded in one of the chapters coming up)
This sounds suspiciously like the German fleet supposed to invade Britain in a sea mamal that shall remain unnamed. As for massive increase in production of ships... this actually requires having a shipbuilding industry in the first place. Which in turn needs accompanying heavy industries. All these are not built overnight or in 3 years. Not sayig its impossible but you are not going to make landing on that scale... with tugboats. You need at least a quarter million tons of shipping, likely more, to do landings on this scale.
Unlike the germans and british in ww2, the Bulgarians have no fleet or proper ocean defenses to stop an invasion. Nor a proper air force. The Ottomans
did have a ship building industry though not massive or impressive before the 1910s. Ships were being built for civilian and trading purposes in Constantinople, Mersin, Sinope and Smryna. Combining the requisitioned civilian ships, and merging the aegean and black sea ships temporarily will give the ottomans enough ships, some ~100(in 1914 the ottomans otl had around 30 maritime trading ships in the aegean and single digit ships in the black sea) to transport the troops. Not exactly in a proper or orderly manner, as shown by the fact that even with numerical, aerial and naval superriority, the ottomans struggled to defeat the bulgarian reservists and reinforcements, but enough to cross a small tract of sea.