멸공의 횃불 – 박완, 다이나믹듀 is the name of the version of the song with the rap. The original song is called 멸공의 횃불, a national war song for South Korea. Translated, it literally means "The Torch of the firm anti- Communist"
The original song's lyrics basically go through 4 verses. Verse 1 is about the army and how they'll defend the peace and people of South Korea, even if it they get caught in a "sea of fire" and sacrifice their life. Verse 2 is about the navy, and it's similar to the army. Verse 3 is the air force and how they'll protect the blue skies of South Korea and "comrade, I'll defend my country Korea." Verse 4 is basically the entire military, calling for everyone to defend their country against any aggressor (pointed at North Korea). Each verse ends with the phrase "멸공이 횃불아래 목숨을 건다" Which basically means, "Under fire from the Communists, I risk my life."
Hoped that helped
Found a link for you with the translation. Took me a while but I got it:
http://youtu.be/TjiWjbgVzM0
You're awesome Thanks!!!
Putin now knows that Russia installing Kim Sr. back in 1945 was one of the biggest mistakes his country ever made. Now it is the duty of Mother Russia to remove his son once and for all. Go get' em, Vlad!
My prediction for North Korea's future :
Five nuclear powers have been hit with biological and gas attacks.
USA, Britain, France, Russia and China are going to launch reprisals of their own. And it'll almost certainly be a nuclear response. Realistically anything less would mean open season on any nuclear armed state which did not respond in kind to such an attack on their citizens. And it seems politics being as they are, that doesn't seem something the nuclear club can allow.
The situation was already horrifying enough. This is going to get even more ugly. A lot of people are going to die.
Sargon
IMVHO, the US was right to use a nuclear weapon when it did--WMD's are NOT something that can be met with anything but the harshest possible response. They gassed one city, so a nuclear weapon seems like the logical response. I would, however, have thought that hitting a military concentration would be more appropriate as well as more effective. NK isn't going to be making more armies, training more divisions, in the time scale of this war, so vaporizing the city accomplishes far less than vaporizing an army.
Right move, wrong target.
Why Vladivostok?
*snip*
So we have to massive islands in Asia now? Joys.
Indeed, China and Russia will be enraged not only by the attack itself, but the sheer ingratitude. I think the consensus will be, time to put the rabid dog down.
Seattle is especially worrisome.
The Chinese and Russians don't care squat about "political correctness", while the British and French may not nuke Korea - unlikely to be able to do so for at least several days to a week. The USA will retaliate, and I expect the USSR and China will as well. The USA will probably hit some of the main military areas, China and/or Russia will hit Pyon'yang. While nobody will be happy about fallout, using airbursts can minimize this. I can see the ROK folks being unhappy about other Koreans being vaporized, but under the circumstances...
In the future I can see what has happened here to make North Korea a country that fits "I'm not totally uselss I can always serve as a bad example"
It's close to North Korea, and there's a major Russian naval base there. It's the Russian equivalent of say, Norfolk or San Diego.
I wonder, though, does North Korea have the capability to engage in simultaneous strikes on such a large scale? It would mean that sleeper agents with significant amounts of biological and chemical weapons had been previously planted in all these cities.By the end of that day, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Austin, Honolulu, and Las Vegas had been struck by poison gas (Seattle was struck with a deadly smallpox bio weapon). Tokyo, Nagasaki, Pusan, Beijing, Vladivostok, London, and Paris were all struck with biological weapons and poison gas also. The total casualties throughout the world was 100,000 from the attacks, and the number was steadily climbing.
It's close to North Korea, and there's a major Russian naval base there. It's the Russian equivalent of say, Norfolk or San Diego. Also, they probably would not want to hit a more important city like say, St. Petersburg or Moscow, as they don't want to piss off the Russians that much. Needless to say, they will be pissed, though.
Talk about escalation.
I wonder, though, does North Korea have the capability to engage in simultaneous strikes on such a large scale? It would mean that sleeper agents with significant amounts of biological and chemical weapons had been previously planted in all these cities.
Why do France and UK will be unable to do this for at least a week ?The Chinese and Russians don't care squat about "political correctness", while the British and French may not nuke Korea - unlikely to be able to do so for at least several days to a week.