Alex Richards
Donor
I'd be more inclined to vote for people if they didn't utterly blow up their maps to the point that I need to zoom out 900% in order to see them properly.
The problem is, these sorts of maps tend to be quite dense with stops- I really cannot make mine much smaller without the text getting cramped.
56 votes so far
8 votes - islander, lock
7 votes - CourageousLife, Dr. Nodelescu, Pischinovski
6 votes - Jonathan Edelstein
5 votes - Xibalba
4 votes - Ares96
2 votes - Alex Richards
1 vote - King Alvar I, psephos
Nice to see I've been overtaken for the first time. Anyway, the "upper" half of contestants each have between 10 and 15 per cent of the votes. No matter what kind of criteria a rulebook would set in the future, we see there are lot of contestants that are really neck and neck and that any winner of this round may find a bigger empiric disapproval than any of the losers.
My proposal for cases like this:
That seems both premature and a bit aggressive IMO. At this point in time, we'd have a Map duel between Islander and Lock and 3-7 Honourable mentions depending on whether Krall goes for the 1/3 rule or decides to just all those who were 1 point behind.