If a religious group enjoys the freedom to practice it's faith to any degree, that religious group has no legitimate grounds for sectarian terrorism.And they are anything but widespread.
Period.
If a religious group enjoys the freedom to practice it's faith to any degree, that religious group has no legitimate grounds for sectarian terrorism.And they are anything but widespread.
Given that mormonism is seemingly rejected by many Americans as un-christian and subject to various prejudices, it could get very nasty if you add mormon terrorism.
This is so ant in the 20th century Christian groups are anything but persecuted.
This is so ant in the 20th century Christian groups are anything but persecuted.
They wouldn't be the biggest domestic problem, but I could easily see the splinter fundamentalist Mormon groups going outside of mere Mormon-on-Mormon violence and targeting non-Mormons.
Why?
What does it get them, other than the enmity of Mormons and non-mormons both?
What is their justification for killing people in ublic acts of atrocity?
They do what they do to get attention, garner followers, and or compel obedience, but the problem is that in this case all it wil do is tick EVERYONE off at them.You could ask the same of Islamic extremists. Or Christian ones, for that matter.
You could ask the same of Islamic extremists. Or Christian ones, for that matter.
Why?
What does it get them, other than the enmity of Mormons and non-mormons both?
What is their justification for killing people in ublic acts of atrocity?
How could you get a timeline were the biggest domestic terrorism problem in the US ends up being with mormon fundamentalists?