"What if Lutzow survived Jutland?"
In this case, the Lutzow might be repaired after severe damage and returned to service in 1917, after repairing its severe damage and the severe damage of other German battlecruisers at Jutland. In this case, the Lutzow's survival would add support to the German victory claims at Jutland, the survival of extra crew might have effects further down the line and the Lutzow would be scuttled at Scapa Flow in (June) 1919, assuming its survival and the subsequent lack of German battlecruiser and dreadnought losses wouldn't make the Germans confident enough to engage the Royal Navy's battleships gun-to-gun or even confident enough to avoid unrestricted submarine warfare and WW1 defeat despite no longer engaging the Royal Navy's battleships gun-to-gun.
"What if Von Der Tann, Moltke, Derfflinger or one of the German dreadnoughts was sunk at Jutland?"
What if battlecruiser Seydlitz was sunk at Jutland? Pods are and can be 1. receiving extra shell hits or another torpedo for damage 2. Trying to keep up with Moltke and steam at 20t knots, maybe not even running aground just in time to save it. Maybe, not finishing repairs to the mine damage...
www.alternatehistory.com
Similar consequences to the link about Seydlitz's loss at Jutland, but otherwise, this is a minor ah pod due to overall minimal butterflies.
"What if HMS Invincible, HMS Queen Mary or HMS Indefatigable avoided exploding at Jutland?"
Likely the pod will be minor enough with minimal to 0 butterflies other than crew survival from the ships, the ships' future usage and preservation or disposal and the deflating of German victory at Jutland claims. If the HMS Invincible or the HMS Indefatigable avoided exploding, the exploding of the other battlecruiser and HMS Queen Mary would cause minimal butterflies by exposing weaknesses in all Royal Navy battlecruisers. However, if the Queen Mary avoided exploding, the butterflies, by allowing the Royal Navy to think only the battlecruisers with 6-inches of armour such as HMS Invincible and HMS Indefatigable would be vulnerable to magazine explosions, would allow the Royal Navy to armour HMS Hood with 9-inches of armour instead of 12-inches even if the remaining Admiral-class battlecruisers were cancelled incomplete.
"What if the British lost one more capital ship at Jutland compared to otl?"
The British suffered some near misses from torpedoes at Jutland that could have been quite painful. The POD is that Lady Luck is not so kind to the British and the near misses turn into hits. / List of near-misses for British at Jutland: / 1) Torpedo hit but did not explode on Revenge...
www.alternatehistory.com
en.wikipedia.org
It depends on the capital ship in question. A flagship would be more important in consequences due to its ability to command engagement at Jutland and later, otherwise, HMS Collingwood's loss would be important by eliminating King George VI with an earlier than otl death and losing one more 15 inch-gunned ship, due to the ship's WW2 and WW1 usage, newness as of Jutland and heavier armament, would have more important consequences compared to the minor ah pod and butterflies involving the extra capital ship loss being from the 13.5/ 14 inch- and smaller gunned non-flagship capital ships except for HMS Collingwood as mentioned.
All the consequences also require the side losing the extra capital ships compared to otl at Jutland not to take more or fewer alternate losses other than the single capital ship implied in this post's pods and the other side to not lose more or fewer ships than otl at Jutland for the pods and the pods' minor status with minimal to 0 ah butterflies from the pods to work.